text_auth_ai / detector /ensemble.py
satyakimitra's picture
UI updated
c79f796
# DEPENDENCIES
import numpy as np
from typing import Any
from typing import List
from typing import Dict
from loguru import logger
from typing import Optional
from dataclasses import dataclass
from config.settings import settings
from config.threshold_config import Domain
from metrics.base_metric import MetricResult
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier
from config.threshold_config import get_threshold_for_domain
from config.threshold_config import get_active_metric_weights
@dataclass
class EnsembleResult:
"""
Result from ensemble classification
"""
final_verdict : str # "AI-Generated", "Human-Written", or "Mixed"
ai_probability : float
human_probability : float
mixed_probability : float
overall_confidence : float
domain : Domain
metric_results : Dict[str, MetricResult]
metric_weights : Dict[str, float]
weighted_scores : Dict[str, float]
reasoning : List[str]
uncertainty_score : float
consensus_level : float
def to_dict(self) -> Dict[str, Any]:
"""
Convert to dictionary for JSON serialization
"""
return {"final_verdict" : self.final_verdict,
"ai_probability" : round(self.ai_probability, 4),
"human_probability" : round(self.human_probability, 4),
"mixed_probability" : round(self.mixed_probability, 4),
"overall_confidence" : round(self.overall_confidence, 4),
"domain" : self.domain.value,
"uncertainty_score" : round(self.uncertainty_score, 4),
"consensus_level" : round(self.consensus_level, 4),
"metric_contributions" : {name: {"weight" : round(self.metric_weights.get(name, 0.0), 4),
"weighted_score" : round(self.weighted_scores.get(name, 0.0), 4),
"ai_prob" : round(result.ai_probability, 4),
"confidence" : round(result.confidence, 4),
}
for name, result in self.metric_results.items()
},
"reasoning" : self.reasoning,
}
class EnsembleClassifier:
"""
Eensemble classifier with multiple aggregation strategies
Features:
- Domain-aware dynamic weighting
- Confidence-calibrated aggregation
- Uncertainty quantification
- Consensus analysis
- Fallback strategies
- Feature-based ML ensemble (optional)
"""
def __init__(self, primary_method: str = "confidence_calibrated", fallback_method: str = "domain_weighted", use_ml_ensemble: bool = False, min_metrics_required: int = 3):
"""
Initialize advanced ensemble classifier
Arguments:
----------
primary_method : Primary aggregation method : "confidence_calibrated", "domain_adaptive", "consensus_based", "ml_ensemble"
fallback_method : Fallback method if primary fails : "domain_weighted", "confidence_weighted", "simple_average"
use_ml_ensemble : Use RandomForest for final aggregation (requires training)
min_metrics_required: Minimum number of valid metrics required
"""
self.primary_method = primary_method
self.fallback_method = fallback_method
self.use_ml_ensemble = use_ml_ensemble
self.min_metrics_required = min_metrics_required
self.ml_model = None
logger.info(f"AdvancedEnsembleClassifier initialized (primary={primary_method}, fallback={fallback_method}, ml_ensemble={use_ml_ensemble})")
def predict(self, metric_results: Dict[str, MetricResult], domain: Domain = Domain.GENERAL) -> EnsembleResult:
"""
Combine metric results using advanced ensemble methods
Arguments:
----------
metric_results { dict } : Dictionary mapping metric names to MetricResult objects
domain { Domain } : Text domain for adaptive thresholding
Returns:
--------
{ EnsembleResult } : EnsembleResult object with final prediction
"""
try:
# Filter and validate metrics
valid_results, validation_info = self._validate_metrics(metric_results)
if (len(valid_results) < self.min_metrics_required):
logger.warning(f"Insufficient valid metrics: {len(valid_results)}/{self.min_metrics_required}")
return self._create_fallback_result(domain, metric_results, "insufficient_metrics")
# Get domain-specific base weights
enabled_metrics = {name: True for name in valid_results.keys()}
base_weights = get_active_metric_weights(domain, enabled_metrics)
# Try primary aggregation method : Initialize in case all methods fail unexpectedly
calculated_weights = dict()
aggregated = {"ai_probability" : 0.5,
"human_probability" : 0.5,
"mixed_probability" : 0.0,
}
try:
if (self.primary_method == "confidence_calibrated"):
aggregated, calculated_weights = self._confidence_calibrated_aggregation(results = valid_results,
base_weights = base_weights,
domain = domain,
)
elif (self.primary_method == "domain_adaptive"):
aggregated, calculated_weights = self._domain_adaptive_aggregation(results = valid_results,
base_weights = base_weights,
domain = domain,
)
elif (self.primary_method == "consensus_based"):
aggregated, calculated_weights = self._consensus_based_aggregation(results = valid_results,
base_weights = base_weights,
domain = domain,
)
elif ((self.primary_method == "ml_ensemble") and self.use_ml_ensemble):
aggregated, calculated_weights = self._ml_ensemble_aggregation(results = valid_results,
base_weights = base_weights,
domain = domain,
)
else:
# Fallback to domain weighted
aggregated, calculated_weights = self._domain_weighted_aggregation(results = valid_results,
base_weights = base_weights,
domain = domain,
)
except Exception as e:
logger.warning(f"Primary aggregation failed: {e}, using fallback")
aggregated, calculated_weights = self._apply_fallback_aggregation(results = valid_results,
base_weights = base_weights,
)
# Start with the calculated weights (from valid_results)
final_metric_weights = calculated_weights.copy()
# Iterate through the *original* metric_results input to the ensemble
for original_metric_name in metric_results.keys():
# If a metric from the original input wasn't included in calculated_weights :assign it a weight of 0.0.
if original_metric_name not in final_metric_weights:
final_metric_weights[original_metric_name] = 0.0
# Calculate advanced metrics using the CALCULATED weights (from valid_results), not the final ones
overall_confidence = self._calculate_advanced_confidence(results = valid_results,
weights = calculated_weights,
aggregated = aggregated,
)
uncertainty_score = self._calculate_uncertainty(results = valid_results,
weights = calculated_weights,
aggregated = aggregated,
)
consensus_level = self._calculate_consensus_level(results = valid_results)
# Apply domain-specific threshold with uncertainty consideration
domain_thresholds = get_threshold_for_domain(domain = domain)
final_verdict = self._apply_adaptive_threshold(aggregated = aggregated,
base_threshold = domain_thresholds.ensemble_threshold,
uncertainty = uncertainty_score,
)
# Generate detailed reasoning using the CALCULATED weights
reasoning = self._generate_detailed_reasoning(results = valid_results,
weights = calculated_weights,
aggregated = aggregated,
verdict = final_verdict,
uncertainty = uncertainty_score,
consensus = consensus_level,
)
# Calculate weighted scores based on the CALCULATED weights (from valid_results)
weighted_scores = {name: result.ai_probability * calculated_weights.get(name, 0.0) for name, result in valid_results.items()}
return EnsembleResult(final_verdict = final_verdict,
ai_probability = aggregated["ai_probability"],
human_probability = aggregated["human_probability"],
mixed_probability = aggregated["mixed_probability"],
overall_confidence = overall_confidence,
domain = domain,
metric_results = metric_results,
metric_weights = final_metric_weights,
weighted_scores = weighted_scores,
reasoning = reasoning,
uncertainty_score = uncertainty_score,
consensus_level = consensus_level,
)
except Exception as e:
logger.error(f"Error in advanced ensemble prediction: {e}")
return self._create_fallback_result(domain, metric_results, str(e))
def _validate_metrics(self, results: Dict[str, MetricResult]) -> tuple:
"""
Validate metrics and return quality information
"""
valid_results = dict()
validation_info = {'failed_metrics' : [],
'low_confidence_metrics' : [],
'high_confidence_metrics' : [],
}
for name, result in results.items():
if result.error is not None:
validation_info['failed_metrics'].append(name)
continue
if (result.confidence < 0.3):
validation_info['low_confidence_metrics'].append(name)
# Still include but with lower weight consideration
valid_results[name] = result
elif (result.confidence > 0.7):
validation_info['high_confidence_metrics'].append(name)
valid_results[name] = result
else:
valid_results[name] = result
return valid_results, validation_info
def _confidence_calibrated_aggregation(self, results: Dict[str, MetricResult], base_weights: Dict[str, float], domain: Domain) -> tuple:
"""
Confidence-calibrated aggregation with domain adaptation
"""
# Calculate confidence-adjusted weights
confidence_weights = dict()
for name, result in results.items():
base_weight = base_weights.get(name, 0.0)
# Confidence-based adjustment with non-linear scaling
confidence_factor = self._sigmoid_confidence_adjustment(confidence = result.confidence)
confidence_weights[name] = base_weight * confidence_factor
# Normalize weights
total_weight = sum(confidence_weights.values())
if (total_weight > 0):
confidence_weights = {name: w / total_weight for name, w in confidence_weights.items()}
# Domain-specific calibration
domain_calibration = self._get_domain_calibration(domain = domain)
calibrated_results = self._calibrate_probabilities(results = results,
calibration = domain_calibration,
)
# Weighted aggregation
return self._weighted_aggregation(calibrated_results, confidence_weights), confidence_weights
def _domain_adaptive_aggregation(self, results: Dict[str, MetricResult], base_weights: Dict[str, float], domain: Domain) -> tuple:
"""
Domain-adaptive aggregation considering metric performance per domain
"""
# Get domain-specific performance weights
domain_weights = self._get_domain_performance_weights(domain, list(results.keys()))
# Combine with base weights
combined_weights = dict()
for name in results.keys():
domain_weight = domain_weights.get(name, 1.0)
base_weight = base_weights.get(name, 0.0)
combined_weights[name] = base_weight * domain_weight
# Normalize
total_weight = sum(combined_weights.values())
if (total_weight > 0):
combined_weights = {name: w / total_weight for name, w in combined_weights.items()}
return self._weighted_aggregation(results, combined_weights), combined_weights
def _consensus_based_aggregation(self, results: Dict[str, MetricResult], base_weights: Dict[str, float]) -> tuple:
"""
Consensus-based aggregation that rewards metric agreement
"""
# Calculate consensus scores
consensus_weights = self._calculate_consensus_weights(results, base_weights)
aggregations = self._weighted_aggregation(results = results,
weights = consensus_weights,
)
return aggregations, consensus_weights
def _ml_ensemble_aggregation(self, results: Dict[str, MetricResult], base_weights: Dict[str, float]) -> tuple:
"""
Machine learning-based ensemble aggregation
"""
if self.ml_model is None:
logger.warning("ML model not available, falling back to weighted average")
return self._weighted_aggregation(results, base_weights), base_weights
try:
# Extract features from metric results
features = self._extract_ml_features(results = results)
# Predict using ML model
prediction = self.ml_model.predict_proba([features])[0]
# For now, assume binary classification [human_prob, ai_prob]
if (len(prediction) == 2):
ai_prob, human_prob = prediction[1], prediction[0]
mixed_prob = 0.0
else:
# Multi-class - adjust accordingly
ai_prob, human_prob, mixed_prob = prediction
aggregated = {"ai_probability" : ai_prob,
"human_probability" : human_prob,
"mixed_probability" : mixed_prob,
}
return aggregated, base_weights
except Exception as e:
logger.warning(f"ML ensemble failed: {e}, using fallback")
return self._weighted_aggregation(results, base_weights), base_weights
def _domain_weighted_aggregation(self, results: Dict[str, MetricResult], base_weights: Dict[str, float]) -> tuple:
"""
Simple domain-weighted aggregation (fallback method)
"""
return self._weighted_aggregation(results, base_weights), base_weights
def _apply_fallback_aggregation(self, results: Dict[str, MetricResult], base_weights: Dict[str, float]) -> tuple:
"""
Apply fallback aggregation method
"""
if (self.fallback_method == "confidence_weighted"):
return self._confidence_weighted_aggregation(results), base_weights
elif (self.fallback_method == "simple_average"):
return self._simple_average_aggregation(results), base_weights
else:
return self._domain_weighted_aggregation(results, base_weights), base_weights
def _weighted_aggregation(self, results: Dict[str, MetricResult], weights: Dict[str, float]) -> Dict[str, float]:
"""
Core weighted aggregation logic
"""
ai_scores = list()
human_scores = list()
mixed_scores = list()
total_weight = 0.0
for name, result in results.items():
weight = weights.get(name, 0.0)
if (weight > 0):
ai_scores.append(result.ai_probability * weight)
human_scores.append(result.human_probability * weight)
mixed_scores.append(result.mixed_probability * weight)
total_weight += weight
if (total_weight == 0):
return {"ai_probability" : 0.5,
"human_probability" : 0.5,
"mixed_probability" : 0.0,
}
# Calculate weighted averages
ai_prob = sum(ai_scores) / total_weight
human_prob = sum(human_scores) / total_weight
mixed_prob = sum(mixed_scores) / total_weight
# Normalize
total = ai_prob + human_prob + mixed_prob
if (total > 0):
ai_prob /= total
human_prob /= total
mixed_prob /= total
return {"ai_probability" : ai_prob,
"human_probability" : human_prob,
"mixed_probability" : mixed_prob,
}
def _confidence_weighted_aggregation(self, results: Dict[str, MetricResult]) -> Dict[str, float]:
"""
Confidence-weighted aggregation
"""
return self._weighted_aggregation(results, {name: result.confidence for name, result in results.items()})
def _simple_average_aggregation(self, results: Dict[str, MetricResult]) -> Dict[str, float]:
"""
Simple average aggregation
"""
return self._weighted_aggregation(results, {name: 1.0 for name in results.keys()})
def _sigmoid_confidence_adjustment(self, confidence: float) -> float:
"""
Non-linear confidence adjustment using sigmoid
"""
# Sigmoid that emphasizes differences around 0.5 confidence
return 1.0 / (1.0 + np.exp(-10.0 * (confidence - 0.5)))
def _get_domain_calibration(self, domain: Domain) -> Dict[str, float]:
"""
Get domain-specific calibration factors
"""
# This would typically come from validation data
# For now, return neutral calibration : FUTURE WQORK
return {}
def _calibrate_probabilities(self, results: Dict[str, MetricResult], calibration: Dict[str, float]) -> Dict[str, MetricResult]:
"""
Calibrate probabilities based on domain performance
"""
calibrated = dict()
for name, result in results.items():
cal_factor = calibration.get(name, 1.0)
# Simple calibration - could be more sophisticated
new_ai_prob = min(1.0, max(0.0, result.ai_probability * cal_factor))
calibrated[name] = MetricResult(metric_name = result.metric_name,
ai_probability = new_ai_prob,
human_probability = 1.0 - new_ai_prob, # Simplified
mixed_probability = result.mixed_probability,
confidence = result.confidence,
details = result.details
)
return calibrated
def _get_domain_performance_weights(self, domain: Domain, metric_names: List[str]) -> Dict[str, float]:
"""
Get domain-specific performance weights (would come from validation data)
"""
# Placeholder - in practice, this would be based on historical performance per domain : FUTURE WORK
performance_weights = {'structural' : 1.0,
'entropy' : 1.0,
'semantic_analysis' : 1.0,
'linguistic' : 1.0,
'perplexity' : 1.0,
'multi_perturbation_stability' : 1.0,
}
# Domain-specific adjustments for all 16 domains
domain_adjustments = {Domain.GENERAL : {'structural' : 1.0,
'perplexity' : 1.0,
'entropy' : 1.0,
'semantic_analysis' : 1.0,
'linguistic' : 1.0,
'multi_perturbation_stability' : 1.0,
},
Domain.ACADEMIC : {'structural' : 1.2,
'perplexity' : 1.3,
'entropy' : 0.9,
'semantic_analysis' : 1.1,
'linguistic' : 1.3,
'multi_perturbation_stability' : 0.8,
},
Domain.CREATIVE : {'structural' : 0.9,
'perplexity' : 1.1,
'entropy' : 1.2,
'semantic_analysis' : 1.0,
'linguistic' : 1.1,
'multi_perturbation_stability' : 0.9,
},
Domain.AI_ML : {'structural' : 1.2,
'perplexity' : 1.3,
'entropy' : 0.9,
'semantic_analysis' : 1.1,
'linguistic' : 1.2,
'multi_perturbation_stability' : 0.8,
},
Domain.SOFTWARE_DEV : {'structural' : 1.2,
'perplexity' : 1.3,
'entropy' : 0.9,
'semantic_analysis' : 1.1,
'linguistic' : 1.2,
'multi_perturbation_stability' : 0.8,
},
Domain.TECHNICAL_DOC : {'structural' : 1.3,
'perplexity' : 1.3,
'entropy' : 0.9,
'semantic_analysis' : 1.2,
'linguistic' : 1.2,
'multi_perturbation_stability' : 0.8,
},
Domain.ENGINEERING : {'structural' : 1.2,
'perplexity' : 1.3,
'entropy' : 0.9,
'semantic_analysis' : 1.1,
'linguistic' : 1.2,
'multi_perturbation_stability' : 0.8,
},
Domain.SCIENCE : {'structural' : 1.2,
'perplexity' : 1.3,
'entropy' : 0.9,
'semantic_analysis' : 1.1,
'linguistic' : 1.2,
'multi_perturbation_stability' : 0.8,
},
Domain.BUSINESS : {'structural' : 1.1,
'perplexity' : 1.2,
'entropy' : 1.0,
'semantic_analysis' : 1.1,
'linguistic' : 1.1,
'multi_perturbation_stability' : 0.9,
},
Domain.LEGAL : {'structural' : 1.3,
'perplexity' : 1.3,
'entropy' : 0.9,
'semantic_analysis' : 1.2,
'linguistic' : 1.3,
'multi_perturbation_stability' : 0.8,
},
Domain.MEDICAL : {'structural' : 1.2,
'perplexity' : 1.3,
'entropy' : 0.9,
'semantic_analysis' : 1.2,
'linguistic' : 1.2,
'multi_perturbation_stability' : 0.8,
},
Domain.JOURNALISM : {'structural' : 1.1,
'perplexity' : 1.2,
'entropy' : 1.0,
'semantic_analysis' : 1.1,
'linguistic' : 1.1,
'multi_perturbation_stability' : 0.8,
},
Domain.MARKETING : {'structural' : 1.0,
'perplexity' : 1.1,
'entropy' : 1.1,
'semantic_analysis' : 1.0,
'linguistic' : 1.2,
'multi_perturbation_stability' : 0.8,
},
Domain.SOCIAL_MEDIA : {'structural' : 0.8,
'perplexity' : 1.0,
'entropy' : 1.3,
'semantic_analysis' : 0.9,
'linguistic' : 0.7,
'multi_perturbation_stability' : 0.9,
},
Domain.BLOG_PERSONAL : {'structural' : 0.9,
'perplexity' : 1.1,
'entropy' : 1.2,
'semantic_analysis' : 1.0,
'linguistic' : 1.0,
'multi_perturbation_stability' : 0.8,
},
Domain.TUTORIAL : {'structural' : 1.1,
'perplexity' : 1.2,
'entropy' : 1.0,
'semantic_analysis' : 1.1,
'linguistic' : 1.1,
'multi_perturbation_stability' : 0.8,
},
}
adjustments = domain_adjustments.get(domain, {})
return {name: performance_weights.get(name, 1.0) * adjustments.get(name, 1.0) for name in metric_names}
def _calculate_consensus_weights(self, results: Dict[str, MetricResult], base_weights: Dict[str, float]) -> Dict[str, float]:
"""
Calculate weights based on metric consensus
"""
# Calculate average AI probability
avg_ai_prob = np.mean([r.ai_probability for r in results.values()])
consensus_weights = dict()
for name, result in results.items():
base_weight = base_weights.get(name, 0.0)
# Reward metrics that agree with consensus
agreement = 1.0 - abs(result.ai_probability - avg_ai_prob)
consensus_weights[name] = base_weight * (0.5 + 0.5 * agreement) # 0.5-1.0 range
# Normalize
total_weight = sum(consensus_weights.values())
if (total_weight > 0):
consensus_weights = {name: w / total_weight for name, w in consensus_weights.items()}
return consensus_weights
def _extract_ml_features(self, results: Dict[str, MetricResult]) -> List[float]:
"""
Extract features for ML ensemble
"""
features = list()
for name in sorted(results.keys()): # Ensure consistent order
result = results[name]
features.extend([result.ai_probability,
result.human_probability,
result.mixed_probability,
result.confidence
])
return features
def _calculate_advanced_confidence(self, results: Dict[str, MetricResult], weights: Dict[str, float], aggregated: Dict[str, float]) -> float:
"""
Calculate advanced confidence considering multiple factors
"""
# Base confidence from metric confidences
base_confidence = sum(result.confidence * weights.get(name, 0.0) for name, result in results.items())
# Agreement factor
ai_probs = [r.ai_probability for r in results.values()]
agreement = 1.0 - min(1.0, np.std(ai_probs) * 2.0) # 0-1 scale
# Certainty factor (how far from 0.5)
certainty = 1.0 - 2.0 * abs(aggregated["ai_probability"] - 0.5)
# Metric quality factor
high_confidence_metrics = sum(1 for r in results.values() if r.confidence > 0.7)
quality_factor = high_confidence_metrics / len(results) if results else 0.0
# Combined confidence
confidence = (base_confidence * 0.4 + agreement * 0.3 + certainty * 0.2 + quality_factor * 0.1)
return max(0.0, min(1.0, confidence))
def _calculate_uncertainty(self, results: Dict[str, MetricResult], weights: Dict[str, float], aggregated: Dict[str, float]) -> float:
"""
Calculate uncertainty score
"""
# Variance in predictions
ai_probs = [r.ai_probability for r in results.values()]
variance_uncertainty = np.var(ai_probs) if len(ai_probs) > 1 else 0.0
# Confidence uncertainty
avg_confidence = np.mean([r.confidence for r in results.values()])
confidence_uncertainty = 1.0 - avg_confidence
# Decision uncertainty (how close to 0.5)
decision_uncertainty = 1.0 - 2.0 * abs(aggregated["ai_probability"] - 0.5)
# Combined uncertainty
uncertainty = (variance_uncertainty * 0.4 + confidence_uncertainty * 0.3 + decision_uncertainty * 0.3)
return max(0.0, min(1.0, uncertainty))
def _calculate_consensus_level(self, results: Dict[str, MetricResult]) -> float:
"""
Calculate consensus level among metrics
"""
if (len(results) < 2):
# Perfect consensus with only one metric
return 1.0
ai_probs = [r.ai_probability for r in results.values()]
std_dev = np.std(ai_probs)
# Convert to consensus level (1.0 = perfect consensus, 0.0 = no consensus)
consensus = 1.0 - min(1.0, std_dev * 2.0)
return consensus
def _apply_adaptive_threshold(self, aggregated: Dict[str, float], base_threshold: float, uncertainty: float) -> str:
"""
Apply adaptive threshold considering uncertainty
"""
ai_prob = aggregated.get("ai_probability", 0.5)
mixed_prob = aggregated.get("mixed_probability", 0.0)
# Adjust threshold based on uncertainty : Higher uncertainty requires more confidence
adjusted_threshold = base_threshold + (uncertainty * 0.1)
# Check for mixed content
if ((mixed_prob > 0.25) or ((uncertainty > 0.6) and (0.3 < ai_prob < 0.7))):
return "Mixed (AI + Human)"
# Apply adjusted threshold
if (ai_prob >= adjusted_threshold):
return "AI-Generated"
elif (ai_prob <= (1.0 - adjusted_threshold)):
return "Human-Written"
else:
return "Uncertain"
def _generate_detailed_reasoning(self, results: Dict[str, MetricResult], weights: Dict[str, float], aggregated: Dict[str, float],
verdict: str, uncertainty: float, consensus: float) -> List[str]:
"""
Generate detailed reasoning for the prediction
"""
reasoning = list()
# Overall assessment
ai_prob = aggregated.get("ai_probability", 0.5)
mixed_prob = aggregated.get("mixed_probability", 0.0)
reasoning.append(f"## Ensemble Analysis Result")
reasoning.append(f"**Final Verdict**: {verdict}")
reasoning.append(f"**AI Probability**: {ai_prob:.1%}")
reasoning.append(f"**Confidence Level**: {self._get_confidence_label(ai_prob)}")
reasoning.append(f"**Uncertainty**: {uncertainty:.1%}")
reasoning.append(f"**Consensus**: {consensus:.1%}")
# Metric analysis
reasoning.append(f"\n## Metric Analysis")
sorted_metrics = sorted(results.items(), key=lambda x: weights.get(x[0], 0.0), reverse=True)
for name, result in sorted_metrics:
weight = weights.get(name, 0.0)
contribution = "High" if (weight > 0.15) else "Medium" if (weight > 0.08) else "Low"
reasoning.append(f"**{name}**: {result.ai_probability:.1%} AI "
f"(Confidence: {result.confidence:.1%}, "
f"Contribution: {contribution})")
# Key factors
reasoning.append(f"\n## Key Decision Factors")
if (uncertainty > 0.7):
reasoning.append("⚠ **High uncertainty** - Metrics show significant disagreement")
elif (consensus > 0.8):
reasoning.append("βœ“ **Strong consensus** - All metrics agree on classification")
top_metric = sorted_metrics[0] if sorted_metrics else None
if (top_metric and (weights.get(top_metric[0], 0.0) > 0.2)):
reasoning.append(f"🎯 **Dominant metric** - {top_metric[0]} had strongest influence")
if (mixed_prob > 0.2):
reasoning.append("πŸ”€ **Mixed signals** - Content shows characteristics of both AI and human writing")
return reasoning
def _get_confidence_label(self, ai_prob: float) -> str:
"""
Get human-readable confidence label
"""
if ((ai_prob > 0.9) or (ai_prob < 0.1)):
return "Very High"
elif ((ai_prob > 0.8) or (ai_prob < 0.2)):
return "High"
elif ((ai_prob > 0.7) or (ai_prob < 0.3)):
return "Moderate"
else:
return "Low"
def _create_fallback_result(self, domain: Domain, metric_results: Dict[str, MetricResult], error: str) -> EnsembleResult:
"""
Create fallback result when ensemble cannot make a confident decision
"""
return EnsembleResult(final_verdict = "Uncertain",
ai_probability = 0.5,
human_probability = 0.5,
mixed_probability = 0.0,
overall_confidence = 0.0,
domain = domain,
metric_results = metric_results,
metric_weights = {},
weighted_scores = {},
reasoning = [f"Ensemble analysis inconclusive", f"Reason: {error}"],
uncertainty_score = 1.0,
consensus_level = 0.0,
)
# Export
__all__ = ["EnsembleResult",
"EnsembleClassifier",
]