File size: 10,701 Bytes
9636971 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 |
---
language:
- en
tags:
- text-classification
- code-comment-classification
- transformers
- codebert
- python
- software-engineering
- multi-label
license: mit
datasets:
- NLBSE/nlbse26-code-comment-classification
metrics:
- f1
- precision
- recall
- subset_accuracy
- runtime
- gflops
pipeline_tag: text-classification
library_name: transformers
inference: false
base_model: microsoft/codebert-base
model-index:
- name: CodeBERT Transformer for Python Code Comment Classification
results:
- task:
type: text-classification
name: Multi-label Text Classification
dataset:
name: NLBSE Code Comment Classification Dataset (Python)
type: NLBSE/nlbse26-code-comment-classification
split: test
metrics:
- type: f1
name: Macro F1
value: 0.6385
- type: f1
name: Micro F1
value: 0.6781
- type: precision
name: Macro Precision
value: 0.5900
- type: recall
name: Macro Recall
value: 0.7061
- type: accuracy
name: Subset Accuracy
value: 0.5690
---
# Transformer Model (CodeBERT) for Python Code Comment Classification
## Model Details
- **Model Type:** Transformer-based multi-label classifier (sequence classification head)
- **Base Model:** [`microsoft/codebert-base`](https://huggingface.co/microsoft/codebert-base)
- **Language:** Python (code comments in English)
- **License:** MIT
- **Developed by:** TheClouds
- **Model Date:** November 2025
- **Model Version:** 1.0
### Description
This model fine-tunes **CodeBERT** on the **Python** subset of the **NLBSE Code Comment Classification Dataset** for **multi-label** classification. Each Python code comment sentence is mapped to one or more semantic categories describing the role and intent of the comment.
The classifier operates on the project’s `combo` field (concatenation of the comment sentence with a compact context string) and produces a 5-dimensional binary label vector.
### Label Set
For Python, the model predicts the following 5 categories (fixed order in the classifier head):
1. `Usage`
2. `Parameters`
3. `DevelopmentNotes`
4. `Expand`
5. `Summary`
Each prediction is a length-5 vector of 0/1 decisions, obtained by applying a sigmoid activation to the logits and thresholding at 0.5 by default.
---
## Intended Use
The model is intended for:
- research on **code comment classification** in Python projects,
- mining and analysis of Python documentation comments,
- tooling that needs semantic tags for comments (e.g., documentation quality inspection, comment recommendation, navigation support).
It is designed for **Python code comments** in English or English-like technical language.
### Out-of-Scope Uses
- Generic natural language classification outside software engineering.
- Non-English comments without additional fine-tuning or adaptation.
- Use in safety- or life-critical decision making.
---
## Data
### Training Data
- **Dataset:** NLBSE Code Comment Classification Dataset – Python train split
- **Size (train):** ~1.4k original training examples (with optional supersampled expansion to ~2k examples, depending on the configuration)
- **Label Space:** 5 multi-label categories (`Usage`, `Parameters`, `DevelopmentNotes`, `Expand`, `Summary`)
- **Preprocessing:**
- Comments extracted from open-source Python projects.
- Each instance represented via the `combo` field: `"<comment_sentence> | <class_context>"`.
- The project’s preprocessing pipeline can generate balanced training CSVs (via supersampling) under `data/processed/transformer`. The metrics reported here correspond to the current transformer configuration logged in MLflow for Python.
### Evaluation Data
- **Dataset:** NLBSE Code Comment Classification Dataset – Python test split
- **Size (test):** ~300 comment sentences
- **Evaluation Protocol:** multi-label classification with micro and macro metrics, plus subset accuracy (exact match).
---
## Metrics
### Core Evaluation Metrics (Python, test split)
From the training/evaluation run logged in MLflow:
| lan | cat | precision | recall | f1 |
|--------|-----------------|-----------|---------|---------|
| python | Usage | 0.80 | 0.76| 0.78|
| python | Parameters | 0.74 | 0.86| 0.79|
| python | DevelopmentNotes| 0.41 | 0.50| 0.45|
| python | Expand | 0.49 | 0.67| 0.57|
| python | Summary | 0.63 | 0.82| 0.71|
- **Micro F1:** 0.6781
- **Macro F1:** 0.6385
- **Micro Precision:** 0.6230
- **Micro Recall:** 0.7438
- **Macro Precision:** 0.5900
- **Macro Recall:** 0.7061
- **Subset Accuracy (exact match):** 0.5690
- **Micro Accuracy (per-label):** 0.8441
- **Eval Loss (BCE with logits):** 0.6727
- **Train Loss (final epoch):** 0.2937
### Benchmarking Metrics
Average performance for the Python transformer benchmark:
- **Average Macro F1:** 0.6385
- **Average Precision (macro):** 0.5900
- **Average Recall (macro):** 0.7061
- **Average Runtime:** ~0.94 seconds (benchmark configuration)
- **Average GFLOPs:** ~1823.25
These results indicate that the transformer captures useful patterns across all five Python comment categories, with stronger performance on frequent labels and reasonable performance on less frequent ones.
---
## Quantitative Analysis
The model is evaluated in a multi-label setting:
- **Micro metrics** emphasize the overall correctness across all label decisions.
- **Macro metrics** treat all labels equally, highlighting the behaviour on minority classes (e.g., `DevelopmentNotes`).
Per-class metrics (precision/recall/F1) can be inspected in the detailed classification report logged as an artifact in MLflow for the Python transformer run. In general, the model performs better on high-frequency labels such as `Usage` and `Summary`, while performance on rarer labels is more variable.
---
## Training Details
### Objective and Architecture
- **Base model:** `microsoft/codebert-base`
- **Head:** linear classification head with `num_labels = 5`
- **Problem type:** `multi_label_classification`
- **Loss function:** `BCEWithLogitsLoss` with per-label **positive class weights** computed from training label frequencies.
- **Sampling:** `WeightedRandomSampler` over training examples to reduce the impact of label imbalance.
### Hyperparameters
- **Max sequence length:** 128
- **Batch size:** 16
- **Learning rate:** 2e-5
- **Optimizer:** AdamW
- **Scheduler:** Linear warmup and decay
- **Warmup ratio:** 0.1
- **Number of epochs:** 5
- **Threshold for prediction:** 0.5 (per-label on sigmoid probabilities)
### Preprocessing and Balancing
- Training uses the **Python** split prepared by the project’s preprocessing pipeline.
- Optional supersampling (oversampling of underrepresented labels with a cap at the maximum label frequency) is available and can be enabled to improve macro performance.
- The test split remains unchanged and corresponds to the original NLBSE Python test partition.
### Hardware / Runtime
The reported runtime and GFLOPs are based on the project’s benchmarking setup (single GPU, standard research workstation). Actual latency and throughput depend on hardware and batch size.
---
## How to Use
Install `transformers` and `torch`:
```bash
pip install transformers torch
```
Then load the model and tokenizer (replace the model ID with your repository name):
```python
import torch
from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForSequenceClassification
MODEL_ID = "se4ai2526-uniba/python-transformer" # replace with actual ID
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(MODEL_ID)
model = AutoModelForSequenceClassification.from_pretrained(MODEL_ID)
model.eval()
LABELS = [
"Usage",
"Parameters",
"DevelopmentNotes",
"Expand",
"Summary",
]
def predict_labels(texts, threshold: float = 0.5):
if isinstance(texts, str):
texts = [texts]
inputs = tokenizer(
texts,
padding=True,
truncation=True,
max_length=128,
return_tensors="pt",
)
with torch.no_grad():
logits = model(**inputs).logits
probs = torch.sigmoid(logits)
preds = (probs > threshold).int().cpu().numpy()
results = []
for row in preds:
labels = [LABELS[i] for i, v in enumerate(row) if v == 1]
results.append(labels)
return results
# Example
comments = [
"# Usage: call this function with a file path | module.py",
]
print(predict_labels(comments))
```
For full reproducibility consistent with the project, use the `ModelPredictor` wrapper and the same preprocessing used during training.
---
## Limitations and Biases
* **Domain-limited:** Trained only on Python code comments from open-source repositories.
* **Imbalanced labels:** Some categories are relatively underrepresented; performance on these labels can lag behind frequent ones.
* **Robustness:** Behavioral tests show that the current model:
* is deterministic and stable on duplicate inputs,
* aligns with several curated golden examples,
* remains sensitive to some benign text changes (extra whitespace, case changes, typos) unless additional normalization/augmentation is introduced.
---
## Ethical Considerations
* The model reflects the style and biases of the open-source Python projects it was trained on.
* It does not filter offensive or inappropriate content in comments; it only predicts semantic categories.
* Outputs should be treated as assistive signals, not as authoritative judgements.
---
## Citation
If you use this model in academic work or derived systems, please cite:
> TheClouds Team. "NLBSE'26 Code Comment Classification – Python Model." 2025.
BibTeX:
```bibtex
@misc{theclouds_nlbse26_code_comment_classification_python,
title = {NLBSE'26 Code Comment Classification: Python Model},
author = {TheClouds Team},
year = {2025},
note = {Model available on Hugging Face},
howpublished = {\url{To be published}}
}
```
Contact:
For questions, feedback, or collaboration requests related to this model, please contact:
> Giacomo Signorile: g.signorile14@studenti.uniba.it
> Davide Pio Posa: d.posa3@studenti.uniba.it
> Marco Lillo: m.lillo21@studenti.uniba.it
> Rebecca Margiotta: m.margiotta5@studenti.uniba.it
> Adriano Gentile: a.gentile97@studenti.uniba.com
Issue tracker: https://github.com/se4ai2526-uniba/TheClouds
```
## Acknowledgements
This model was developed as part of research on **Natural Language-Based Software Engineering (NLBSE)** and the **Code Comment Classification** task, building on the NLBSE’26 competition data and earlier SetFit and Random Forest baselines.
|