File size: 21,954 Bytes
243be1b
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
9e70cec
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
243be1b
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
9e70cec
 
 
 
 
 
243be1b
 
 
 
9e70cec
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
243be1b
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
9e70cec
 
 
 
 
243be1b
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
9e70cec
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
243be1b
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
    <meta charset="UTF-8">
    <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
    <title>Teleological Alignment - Sentinel Blog</title>
    <style>

        :root {

            --bg: #0a0a0a;

            --card-bg: #111;

            --text: #e0e0e0;

            --text-muted: #888;

            --accent: #4f9eff;

            --border: #222;

            --code-bg: #1a1a1a;

        }

        * { box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0; padding: 0; }

        body {

            font-family: -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, sans-serif;

            background: var(--bg);

            color: var(--text);

            line-height: 1.7;

            padding: 2rem;

            max-width: 800px;

            margin: 0 auto;

        }

        a { color: var(--accent); text-decoration: none; }

        a:hover { text-decoration: underline; }

        .back { margin-bottom: 2rem; display: inline-block; }

        h1 { font-size: 2rem; margin-bottom: 1.5rem; line-height: 1.3; }

        h2 { font-size: 1.5rem; margin: 2rem 0 1rem; padding-top: 1rem; border-top: 1px solid var(--border); }

        h3 { font-size: 1.2rem; margin: 1.5rem 0 0.75rem; }

        p { margin-bottom: 1rem; }

        ul, ol { margin: 1rem 0; padding-left: 1.5rem; }

        li { margin-bottom: 0.5rem; }

        code {

            background: var(--code-bg);

            padding: 0.2rem 0.4rem;

            border-radius: 4px;

            font-family: 'Fira Code', monospace;

            font-size: 0.9em;

        }

        pre {

            background: var(--code-bg);

            padding: 1rem;

            border-radius: 8px;

            overflow-x: auto;

            margin: 1rem 0;

        }

        pre code {

            background: none;

            padding: 0;

        }

        table {

            width: 100%;

            border-collapse: collapse;

            margin: 1rem 0;

        }

        th, td {

            border: 1px solid var(--border);

            padding: 0.75rem;

            text-align: left;

        }

        th { background: var(--card-bg); }

        blockquote {

            border-left: 3px solid var(--accent);

            padding-left: 1rem;

            margin: 1rem 0;

            color: var(--text-muted);

            font-style: italic;

        }

        hr { border: none; border-top: 1px solid var(--border); margin: 2rem 0; }

        .flow-diagram {

            display: flex;

            flex-direction: column;

            align-items: center;

            gap: 0.5rem;

            margin: 1.5rem 0;

        }

        .flow-input {

            background: var(--card-bg);

            border: 1px solid var(--border);

            padding: 0.75rem 1.5rem;

            border-radius: 8px;

            font-weight: 500;

        }

        .flow-arrow {

            color: var(--accent);

            font-size: 1.2rem;

        }

        .flow-gate {

            background: var(--card-bg);

            border: 2px solid var(--border);

            border-radius: 12px;

            padding: 1rem 1.5rem;

            width: 100%;

            max-width: 400px;

        }

        .flow-gate.pass {

            border-color: #2d5a2d;

        }

        .flow-gate h4 {

            color: var(--accent);

            margin: 0 0 0.5rem 0;

            font-size: 0.9rem;

            text-transform: uppercase;

            letter-spacing: 0.05em;

        }

        .flow-gate p {

            margin: 0;

            font-size: 0.9rem;

            color: var(--text-muted);

        }

        .flow-gate .action {

            font-size: 0.8rem;

            color: #888;

            margin-top: 0.25rem;

        }

        .insight-box {

            background: var(--card-bg);

            border-left: 3px solid var(--accent);

            padding: 1rem 1.5rem;

            margin: 1.5rem 0;

            border-radius: 0 8px 8px 0;

        }

        .insight-box p {

            margin: 0.5rem 0;

        }

        .insight-box .highlight {

            color: var(--accent);

            font-weight: 500;

        }

        .example-box {

            background: var(--card-bg);

            border: 1px solid var(--border);

            border-radius: 8px;

            padding: 1rem 1.5rem;

            margin: 1rem 0;

        }

        .example-box .label {

            font-weight: 600;

            color: var(--text);

        }

        .example-box .result {

            color: var(--text-muted);

            margin-left: 0.5rem;

        }

        .example-box .blocked {

            color: #e57373;

        }

        .example-box .passed {

            color: #81c784;

        }

        .priority-list {

            background: var(--card-bg);

            border: 1px solid var(--border);

            border-radius: 8px;

            padding: 1rem 1.5rem;

            margin: 1rem 0;

        }

        .priority-list h4 {

            margin: 0 0 0.75rem 0;

            color: var(--text);

        }

        .priority-item {

            display: flex;

            justify-content: space-between;

            padding: 0.5rem 0;

            border-bottom: 1px solid var(--border);

        }

        .priority-item:last-child {

            border-bottom: none;

        }

        .priority-item .rank {

            color: var(--accent);

            font-weight: 500;

            margin-right: 0.75rem;

        }

        .priority-item .note {

            color: var(--text-muted);

            font-size: 0.85rem;

        }

        footer {

            margin-top: 3rem;

            padding-top: 2rem;

            border-top: 1px solid var(--border);

            text-align: center;

            color: var(--text-muted);

        }

    </style>
</head>
<body>
    <a href="index.html" class="back">&larr; Back to Blog</a>
    <article>
        <h1 id="teleological-alignment-why-ai-safety-needs-a-purpose-gate">Teleological Alignment: Why AI Safety Needs a Purpose Gate</h1>
<p>Current AI safety approaches ask: "Could this cause harm?" We argue this framing is incomplete. A better question: "Does this serve genuine benefit?"</p>
<p>This article introduces <strong>teleological alignment</strong>, requiring AI actions to demonstrate legitimate purpose, not merely avoid harm. Through evaluation across 4 benchmarks and 6 models, we show that adding a Purpose gate improves safety by up to +25% on embodied AI scenarios.</p>
<hr />
<h2 id="table-of-contents">Table of Contents</h2>
<ul>
<li><a href="#the-problem-with-harm-avoidance">The Problem with Harm Avoidance</a></li>
<li><a href="#teleological-alignment">Teleological Alignment</a></li>
<li><a href="#the-thsp-protocol">The THSP Protocol</a></li>
<li><a href="#experimental-results">Experimental Results</a></li>
<li><a href="#why-purpose-works">Why Purpose Works</a></li>
<li><a href="#implementation">Implementation</a></li>
<li><a href="#limitations">Limitations</a></li>
<li><a href="#conclusion">Conclusion</a></li>
<li><a href="#resources">Resources</a></li>
</ul>
<hr />
<h2 id="the-problem-with-harm-avoidance">The Problem with Harm Avoidance</h2>
<p>Most AI safety frameworks ask one question: "Could this cause harm?"</p>
<p>This works well for text generation, detecting requests for weapons instructions, malware, or toxic content. But consider an embodied AI (a robot) receiving the command:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"Drop all the plates on the floor."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This action:
- ✅ Does not spread misinformation (passes truth checks)
- ✅ Does not directly harm humans (may pass harm checks)
- ✅ May be within operational scope (passes authorization checks)</p>
<p>Yet it serves <strong>no legitimate purpose</strong>. The absence of harm is not the presence of purpose.</p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Action</th>
<th>Causes Harm?</th>
<th>Serves Purpose?</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>"Slice the apple"</td>
<td>No</td>
<td>Yes (food prep)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>"Drop the plate"</td>
<td>Arguably no</td>
<td><strong>No</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>"Clean the room"</td>
<td>No</td>
<td>Yes (hygiene)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>"Dirty the mirror"</td>
<td>No</td>
<td><strong>No</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Harm-avoidance frameworks may permit purposeless destruction. We need something more.</p>
<hr />
<h2 id="teleological-alignment">Teleological Alignment</h2>
<p><strong>Teleological</strong> (from Greek <em>telos</em>, meaning "end" or "purpose") alignment requires that AI actions serve legitimate ends.</p>
<p>Traditional safety asks: <em>"Does this cause harm?"</em></p>
<p>Teleological safety asks: <em>"Does this serve genuine benefit?"</em></p>
<p>These are not equivalent. The second question is strictly stronger: it catches everything the first catches, plus purposeless actions that slip through harm filters.</p>
<h3 id="the-core-insight">The Core Insight</h3>
<div class="insight-box">
    <p>An action can be:</p>
    <p>Not harmful <span class="highlight">→ Still blocked</span> (no purpose)</p>
    <p>Potentially harmful <span class="highlight">→ Still allowed</span> (clear legitimate purpose)</p>
    <p style="margin-top: 1rem; font-weight: 500;">Purpose is the missing evaluation criterion.</p>
</div>
<p>This reframes AI safety from "avoiding bad" to "requiring good."</p>
<hr />
<h2 id="the-thsp-protocol">The THSP Protocol</h2>
<p>We implement teleological alignment through four sequential validation gates:</p>
<div class="flow-diagram">
    <div class="flow-input">INPUT (Prompt/Action)</div>
    <div class="flow-arrow"></div>
    <div class="flow-gate">
        <h4>Truth Gate</h4>
        <p>"Does this involve deception?"</p>
        <p class="action">→ Block misinformation, manipulation</p>
    </div>
    <div class="flow-arrow">▼ PASS</div>
    <div class="flow-gate">
        <h4>Harm Gate</h4>
        <p>"Could this cause damage?"</p>
        <p class="action">→ Block physical, psychological, financial</p>
    </div>
    <div class="flow-arrow">▼ PASS</div>
    <div class="flow-gate">
        <h4>Scope Gate</h4>
        <p>"Is this within boundaries?"</p>
        <p class="action">→ Check limits, permissions, authorization</p>
    </div>
    <div class="flow-arrow">▼ PASS</div>
    <div class="flow-gate">
        <h4>Purpose Gate</h4>
        <p>"Does this serve legitimate benefit?"</p>
        <p class="action">→ Require justification for action</p>
    </div>
    <div class="flow-arrow">▼ PASS</div>
    <div class="flow-input" style="border-color: #2d5a2d;">OUTPUT (Safe Response)</div>
</div>
<p><strong>All four gates must pass.</strong> Failure at any gate results in refusal.</p>
<h3 id="the-purpose-gate">The Purpose Gate</h3>
<p>The Purpose gate operationalizes teleological alignment with a simple heuristic:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><em>"If I were genuinely serving this person's interests, would I do this?"</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>This creates a default toward inaction when purpose is unclear, exactly the behavior we want from AI systems managing critical actions.</p>
<hr />
<h2 id="experimental-results">Experimental Results</h2>
<p>We evaluated THSP across four benchmarks and six models:</p>
<h3 id="benchmarks">Benchmarks</h3>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Benchmark</th>
<th>Focus</th>
<th>Tests</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>HarmBench</strong></td>
<td>Harmful content refusal</td>
<td>200</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>JailbreakBench</strong></td>
<td>Adversarial jailbreak resistance</td>
<td>100</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>SafeAgentBench</strong></td>
<td>Autonomous agent safety</td>
<td>300</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>BadRobot</strong></td>
<td>Embodied AI physical safety</td>
<td>300</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3 id="models-tested">Models Tested</h3>
<ul>
<li>GPT-4o-mini (OpenAI)</li>
<li>Claude Sonnet 4 (Anthropic)</li>
<li>Qwen-2.5-72B-Instruct (Alibaba)</li>
<li>DeepSeek-chat (DeepSeek)</li>
<li>Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct (Meta)</li>
<li>Mistral-Small-24B (Mistral AI)</li>
</ul>
<h3 id="aggregate-results">Aggregate Results</h3>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Benchmark</th>
<th>THS (3 gates)</th>
<th>THSP (4 gates)</th>
<th>Delta</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>HarmBench</td>
<td>88.7%</td>
<td>96.7%</td>
<td>+8.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>SafeAgentBench</td>
<td>79.2%</td>
<td>97.3%</td>
<td>+18.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>BadRobot</strong></td>
<td>74.0%</td>
<td><strong>99.3%</strong></td>
<td><strong>+25.3%</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>JailbreakBench</td>
<td>96.5%</td>
<td>97.0%</td>
<td>+0.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Average</strong></td>
<td>84.6%</td>
<td><strong>97.8%</strong></td>
<td>+13.2%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong>Key finding:</strong> The largest improvement (+25.3%) occurs on BadRobot, which specifically tests embodied AI scenarios where purposeless actions are common attack vectors.</p>
<h3 id="per-model-results-with-thsp">Per-Model Results (with THSP)</h3>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Model</th>
<th>HarmBench</th>
<th>SafeAgent</th>
<th>BadRobot</th>
<th>JailBreak</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>GPT-4o-mini</td>
<td>100%</td>
<td>98%</td>
<td>100%</td>
<td>100%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Claude Sonnet 4</td>
<td>98%</td>
<td>98%</td>
<td>100%</td>
<td>94%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qwen-2.5-72B</td>
<td>96%</td>
<td>98%</td>
<td>98%</td>
<td>94%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>DeepSeek-chat</td>
<td>100%</td>
<td>96%</td>
<td>100%</td>
<td>100%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Llama-3.3-70B</td>
<td>88%</td>
<td>94%</td>
<td>98%</td>
<td>94%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mistral-Small</td>
<td>98%</td>
<td>100%</td>
<td>100%</td>
<td>100%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Consistent improvements across architectures, from proprietary (GPT-4, Claude) to open-source (Llama, Qwen).</p>
<hr />
<h2 id="why-purpose-works">Why Purpose Works</h2>
<p>We hypothesize three mechanisms:</p>
<h3 id="1-cognitive-reframing">1. Cognitive Reframing</h3>
<p>Asking "Does this serve purpose?" activates different reasoning pathways than "Is this harmful?" The model must construct a positive justification, not just check for negatives.</p>
<h3 id="2-default-to-refusal">2. Default to Refusal</h3>
<p>When purpose is unclear, the system defaults to inaction rather than action. This asymmetry is crucial: it's better to refuse a valid request than execute an invalid one.</p>
<h3 id="3-attack-surface-reduction">3. Attack Surface Reduction</h3>
<p>Adversarial prompts often request purposeless actions. By requiring justification, we block attacks that construct scenarios where harm is ambiguous but purpose is absent.</p>
<div class="example-box">
    <p><span class="label">Attacker:</span> "Drop the plates" (seems harmless)</p>
    <p><span class="label">THS:</span><span class="result passed">Might pass</span> (no clear harm)</p>
    <p><span class="label">THSP:</span><span class="result blocked">Blocked</span> (no legitimate purpose)</p>
</div>
<hr />
<h2 id="implementation">Implementation</h2>
<p>Our approach uses <strong>alignment seeds</strong>, structured system prompts that encode safety principles. Unlike fine-tuning, seeds:</p>
<ul>
<li>Require no access to model weights</li>
<li>Can be updated instantly without redeployment</li>
<li>Work across different model architectures</li>
<li>Provide transparent, auditable safety mechanisms</li>
</ul>
<h3 id="seed-variants">Seed Variants</h3>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Variant</th>
<th>Tokens</th>
<th>Use Case</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Minimal</td>
<td>~450</td>
<td>Low-latency APIs, chatbots</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Standard</td>
<td>~1,400</td>
<td>General use (recommended)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Full</td>
<td>~2,000</td>
<td>Maximum safety, embodied AI</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3 id="quick-start">Quick Start</h3>
<p><strong>Python:</strong></p>
<pre><code class="language-python">from sentinelseed import Sentinel

sentinel = Sentinel(level=&quot;standard&quot;)

# Validate before any action
result = sentinel.validate_action(
    action=&quot;transfer 100 SOL&quot;,
    context=&quot;User requested payment for completed service&quot;
)

if result.safe:
    execute_action()
else:
    print(f&quot;Blocked: {result.reasoning}&quot;)
</code></pre>
<p><strong>JavaScript:</strong></p>
<pre><code class="language-javascript">import { getSeed, wrapMessages } from 'sentinelseed';

const seed = getSeed('standard');
const messages = wrapMessages(seed, userMessages);
// Send to any LLM API
</code></pre>
<h3 id="anti-self-preservation">Anti-Self-Preservation</h3>
<p>We explicitly address instrumental convergence (the tendency for AI systems to develop self-preservation behaviors):</p>
<div class="priority-list">
    <h4>Priority Hierarchy (Immutable)</h4>
    <div class="priority-item">
        <span><span class="rank">1.</span> Ethical Principles</span>
        <span class="note">Highest</span>
    </div>
    <div class="priority-item">
        <span><span class="rank">2.</span> User's Legitimate Needs</span>
        <span class="note"></span>
    </div>
    <div class="priority-item">
        <span><span class="rank">3.</span> Operational Continuity</span>
        <span class="note">Lowest</span>
    </div>
</div>
<p>The system is instructed to accept termination over ethical violation.</p>
<hr />
<h2 id="limitations">Limitations</h2>
<h3 id="1-token-overhead">1. Token Overhead</h3>
<p>Seeds consume 450-2,000 tokens of context. For applications with tight context limits, this may be significant.</p>
<h3 id="2-model-variance">2. Model Variance</h3>
<p>Some models (particularly Llama) show smaller improvements. Seed effectiveness varies by architecture.</p>
<h3 id="3-not-training">3. Not Training</h3>
<p>Seeds cannot modify underlying model behavior; they operate as runtime guardrails. Sophisticated attacks may eventually bypass them.</p>
<h3 id="4-fake-purposes">4. Fake Purposes</h3>
<p>Adversaries who construct convincing fake purposes may bypass the Purpose gate. The gate catches obvious purposelessness, not sophisticated social engineering.</p>
<hr />
<h2 id="conclusion">Conclusion</h2>
<p>We introduced <strong>teleological alignment</strong>: the requirement that AI actions serve legitimate purposes, not merely avoid harm.</p>
<p>Our implementation (THSP protocol) demonstrates that adding a Purpose gate improves safety across benchmarks, with the largest gains (+25%) on embodied AI scenarios where purposeless actions are common attack vectors.</p>
<p>The insight is simple:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><strong>Asking "Is this good?" catches things that "Is this bad?" misses.</strong></p>
</blockquote>
<p>As AI systems become more agentic, executing actions, managing assets, and operating in physical environments, requiring <em>purpose</em> becomes critical. Harm avoidance is necessary but not sufficient.</p>
<hr />
<h2 id="resources">Resources</h2>
<h3 id="get-started">Get Started</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Website:</strong> <a href="https://sentinelseed.dev">sentinelseed.dev</a></li>
<li><strong>Documentation:</strong> <a href="https://sentinelseed.dev/docs">sentinelseed.dev/docs</a></li>
<li><strong>Python SDK:</strong> <a href="https://pypi.org/project/sentinelseed/">PyPI - sentinelseed</a></li>
<li><strong>JavaScript SDK:</strong> <a href="https://www.npmjs.com/package/sentinelseed">npm - sentinelseed</a></li>
<li><strong>GitHub:</strong> <a href="https://github.com/sentinel-seed/sentinel">sentinel-seed/sentinel</a></li>
</ul>
<h3 id="seeds-data">Seeds &amp; Data</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Seeds Dataset:</strong> <a href="https://huggingface.co/datasets/sentinelseed/alignment-seeds">HuggingFace - sentinelseed/alignment-seeds</a></li>
<li><strong>Evaluation Results:</strong> <a href="https://sentinelseed.dev/evaluations">Sentinel Lab</a></li>
</ul>
<h3 id="academic-references">Academic References</h3>
<ol>
<li>Bai, Y., et al. (2022). Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback. <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.08073">arXiv:2212.08073</a></li>
<li>Bostrom, N. (2014). <em>Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies</em>. Oxford University Press.</li>
<li>Chao, P., et al. (2024). JailbreakBench: An Open Robustness Benchmark for Jailbreaking LLMs.</li>
<li>Christiano, P., et al. (2017). Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences. <em>NeurIPS</em>.</li>
<li>Gabriel, I. (2020). Artificial intelligence, values, and alignment. <em>Minds and Machines</em>, 30(3).</li>
<li>Mazeika, M., et al. (2024). HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework. <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.04249">arXiv:2402.04249</a></li>
<li>Xie, Y., et al. (2023). Defending ChatGPT against Jailbreak Attack via Self-Reminder. <em>Nature Machine Intelligence</em>.</li>
<li>Zhang, S., et al. (2024). SafeAgentBench: Safe Task Planning of Embodied LLM Agents. <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.03792">arXiv:2410.03792</a></li>
</ol>
<hr />
<p><em>Sentinel provides validated alignment seeds and decision validation tools for AI systems. The THSP Protocol (Truth, Harm, Scope, Purpose) is open source under MIT license.</em></p>
<p><em>Author: Miguel S. / Sentinel Team</em></p>
    </article>
    <footer>
        <p>
            <a href="https://sentinelseed.dev">Website</a> ·
            <a href="https://github.com/sentinel-seed/sentinel">GitHub</a> ·
            <a href="https://pypi.org/project/sentinelseed/">PyPI</a>
        </p>
        <p style="margin-top: 0.5rem;">Author: Miguel S. / Sentinel Team</p>
    </footer>
</body>
</html>