Update app.py
Browse files
app.py
CHANGED
|
@@ -6,7 +6,6 @@ from tavily import TavilyClient
|
|
| 6 |
from pydantic import BaseModel
|
| 7 |
from ollama import chat
|
| 8 |
from dotenv import load_dotenv
|
| 9 |
-
from groq import Groq
|
| 10 |
import instructor
|
| 11 |
import logging
|
| 12 |
from together import Together
|
|
@@ -16,12 +15,26 @@ import json
|
|
| 16 |
logging.basicConfig(level=logging.INFO, format='%(asctime)s - %(levelname)s - %(message)s')
|
| 17 |
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-
|
| 20 |
ELEVEN_LABS_API_KEY = "sk_cc3fea7dcfd81744dcc51673fcd011e7315d4732bab408a7"
|
| 21 |
TAVILY_API_KEY = "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"
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
load_dotenv()
|
| 24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
def fetch_from_web(query):
|
| 27 |
tavily_client = TavilyClient(api_key=TAVILY_API_KEY)
|
|
@@ -42,7 +55,7 @@ class Sentiment(BaseModel):
|
|
| 42 |
sentiment: Literal['positive', 'negative', 'neutral']
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
-
def analyze_sentiment(article
|
| 46 |
sentiment_prompt = f"""
|
| 47 |
Analyze the following news article about a company:
|
| 48 |
|
|
@@ -65,78 +78,30 @@ def analyze_sentiment(article, model_provider = "Groq"):
|
|
| 65 |
"""
|
| 66 |
|
| 67 |
try:
|
| 68 |
-
|
| 69 |
-
response = chat(
|
| 70 |
-
messages=[
|
| 71 |
-
{
|
| 72 |
-
'role': 'user',
|
| 73 |
-
'content': sentiment_prompt
|
| 74 |
-
}
|
| 75 |
-
],
|
| 76 |
-
model='llama3.2:3b',
|
| 77 |
-
format=Sentiment.model_json_schema(),
|
| 78 |
-
)
|
| 79 |
|
| 80 |
-
|
| 81 |
-
|
| 82 |
-
final_dict = {
|
| 83 |
-
"title": article["title"],
|
| 84 |
-
"summary": sentiment_output.summary,
|
| 85 |
-
"reasoning": sentiment_output.reasoning,
|
| 86 |
-
"topics": sentiment_output.topics,
|
| 87 |
-
"sentiment": sentiment_output.sentiment
|
| 88 |
-
}
|
| 89 |
-
elif model_provider == "GROQ":
|
| 90 |
-
llm = Groq(api_key=GROQ_API_KEY)
|
| 91 |
-
llm = instructor.from_groq(llm, mode=instructor.Mode.TOOLS)
|
| 92 |
-
|
| 93 |
-
resp = llm.chat.completions.create(
|
| 94 |
-
model="llama-3.3-70b-versatile",
|
| 95 |
-
messages=[
|
| 96 |
-
{
|
| 97 |
-
"role": "user",
|
| 98 |
-
"content": sentiment_prompt,
|
| 99 |
-
}
|
| 100 |
-
],
|
| 101 |
-
response_model=Sentiment,
|
| 102 |
-
)
|
| 103 |
-
|
| 104 |
-
sentiment_output = resp.model_dump()
|
| 105 |
-
|
| 106 |
-
final_dict = {
|
| 107 |
-
"title": article["title"],
|
| 108 |
-
"summary": sentiment_output.get("summary"),
|
| 109 |
-
"reasoning": sentiment_output.get("reasoning"),
|
| 110 |
-
"topics": sentiment_output.get("topics"),
|
| 111 |
-
"sentiment": sentiment_output.get("sentiment")
|
| 112 |
-
}
|
| 113 |
-
|
| 114 |
-
elif model_provider == "Together":
|
| 115 |
-
|
| 116 |
-
client = Together(api_key = "aa77adf5b5adaefe8fb3e4a5a1e9bb4937ba9d5d362e03de2521631ab9dab07f")
|
| 117 |
-
|
| 118 |
-
extract = client.chat.completions.create(
|
| 119 |
-
messages=[
|
| 120 |
{
|
| 121 |
"role": "user",
|
| 122 |
"content": sentiment_prompt,
|
| 123 |
},
|
| 124 |
],
|
| 125 |
-
model="meta-llama/
|
| 126 |
response_format={
|
| 127 |
"type": "json_object",
|
| 128 |
"schema": Sentiment.model_json_schema(),
|
| 129 |
},
|
| 130 |
)
|
| 131 |
|
| 132 |
-
|
| 133 |
|
| 134 |
-
|
| 135 |
"title": article["title"],
|
| 136 |
-
"summary": output
|
| 137 |
-
"reasoning": output
|
| 138 |
-
"topics": output
|
| 139 |
-
"sentiment": output
|
| 140 |
}
|
| 141 |
|
| 142 |
return final_dict
|
|
@@ -227,146 +192,96 @@ def get_summaries_by_sentiment(articles):
|
|
| 227 |
return pos_sum, neg_sum, neutral_sum
|
| 228 |
|
| 229 |
|
| 230 |
-
def comparative_analysis(pos_sum, neg_sum, neutral_sum
|
| 231 |
prompt = f"""
|
| 232 |
-
Perform a detailed comparative analysis of the sentiment across three categories of articles (Positive, Negative, and Neutral) about a specific company. Address the following aspects:
|
| 233 |
-
|
| 234 |
-
1. **Sentiment Breakdown**: Identify how each category (positive, negative, and neutral) portrays the company. Highlight the language, tone, and emotional cues that shape the sentiment.
|
| 235 |
|
| 236 |
-
|
| 237 |
|
| 238 |
-
|
| 239 |
|
| 240 |
-
|
| 241 |
|
| 242 |
-
|
| 243 |
|
| 244 |
-
|
| 245 |
|
| 246 |
-
|
| 247 |
-
{pos_sum}
|
| 248 |
|
| 249 |
-
###
|
| 250 |
-
{
|
| 251 |
|
| 252 |
-
###
|
| 253 |
-
{
|
| 254 |
-
"""
|
| 255 |
|
| 256 |
-
|
| 257 |
-
|
| 258 |
-
|
| 259 |
-
{
|
| 260 |
-
'role': 'user',
|
| 261 |
-
'content': prompt
|
| 262 |
-
}
|
| 263 |
-
],
|
| 264 |
-
model='llama3.2:3b'
|
| 265 |
-
)
|
| 266 |
-
response = response.message.content
|
| 267 |
-
|
| 268 |
-
else:
|
| 269 |
-
llm = Groq(api_key=GROQ_API_KEY)
|
| 270 |
-
|
| 271 |
-
chat_completion = llm.chat.completions.create(
|
| 272 |
-
messages=[
|
| 273 |
-
{
|
| 274 |
-
"role": "user",
|
| 275 |
-
"content": prompt[:5000],
|
| 276 |
-
}
|
| 277 |
-
],
|
| 278 |
-
model="llama-3.3-70b-versatile",
|
| 279 |
-
)
|
| 280 |
-
response = chat_completion.choices[0].message.content
|
| 281 |
-
|
| 282 |
-
return response
|
| 283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 284 |
|
| 285 |
-
def generate_final_report(pos_sum, neg_sum, neutral_sum, comparative_sentiment
|
| 286 |
final_report_prompt = f"""
|
| 287 |
-
|
| 288 |
-
|
| 289 |
-
### 1. Executive Summary
|
| 290 |
-
- Overview of sentiment distribution: {comparative_sentiment["Sentiment Distribution"]['Positive']} positive, {comparative_sentiment["Sentiment Distribution"]['Negative']} negative, {comparative_sentiment["Sentiment Distribution"]['Neutral']} neutral.
|
| 291 |
-
- Highlight the dominant narrative shaping the company's perception.
|
| 292 |
-
- Summarize key drivers behind positive and negative sentiments.
|
| 293 |
-
|
| 294 |
-
### 2. Media Coverage Analysis
|
| 295 |
-
- Identify major news sources covering the company.
|
| 296 |
-
- Highlight patterns in coverage across platforms (e.g., frequency, timing).
|
| 297 |
-
- Identify whether media sentiment shifts over time.
|
| 298 |
-
|
| 299 |
-
### 3. Sentiment Breakdown
|
| 300 |
-
- **Positive Sentiment:**
|
| 301 |
-
|
| 302 |
-
|
| 303 |
-
- **Negative Sentiment:**
|
| 304 |
-
|
| 305 |
-
|
| 306 |
-
- **Neutral Sentiment:**
|
| 307 |
-
|
| 308 |
-
|
| 309 |
-
|
| 310 |
-
### 4. Narrative Analysis
|
| 311 |
-
- Identify primary storylines about the company.
|
| 312 |
-
- Analyze how the company is positioned (positive, neutral, negative).
|
| 313 |
-
- Detect shifts or emerging narratives over time.
|
| 314 |
-
|
| 315 |
-
### 5. Key Drivers of Sentiment
|
| 316 |
-
- Identify specific events, announcements, or actions driving media sentiment.
|
| 317 |
-
- Evaluate sentiment linked to industry trends vs. company-specific factors.
|
| 318 |
-
- Highlight company strengths and weaknesses based on media portrayal.
|
| 319 |
-
|
| 320 |
-
### 6. Competitive Context
|
| 321 |
-
- Identify competitor comparisons.
|
| 322 |
-
- Analyze how media sentiment about the company compares to industry standards.
|
| 323 |
-
- Highlight competitive advantages or concerns raised by the media.
|
| 324 |
-
|
| 325 |
-
### 7. Stakeholder Perspective
|
| 326 |
-
- Identify how key stakeholders (e.g., investors, customers, regulators) are represented.
|
| 327 |
-
- Analyze stakeholder concerns and reputation risks/opportunities.
|
| 328 |
-
|
| 329 |
-
### 8. Recommendations
|
| 330 |
-
- Suggest strategies to mitigate negative sentiment.
|
| 331 |
-
- Recommend approaches to amplify positive narratives.
|
| 332 |
-
- Provide messaging suggestions for future announcements.
|
| 333 |
-
|
| 334 |
-
### 9. Appendix
|
| 335 |
-
- Full article details (title, publication, date, author, URL).
|
| 336 |
-
- Sentiment scoring methodology.
|
| 337 |
-
- Media monitoring metrics (reach, engagement, etc.).
|
| 338 |
-
"""
|
| 339 |
-
|
| 340 |
-
|
| 341 |
-
final_report = chat(
|
| 342 |
-
messages=[
|
| 343 |
-
{
|
| 344 |
-
'role': 'user',
|
| 345 |
-
'content': final_report_prompt
|
| 346 |
-
}
|
| 347 |
-
],
|
| 348 |
-
model='llama3.2:3b'
|
| 349 |
-
)
|
| 350 |
-
response = final_report.message.content
|
| 351 |
-
|
| 352 |
-
else:
|
| 353 |
-
llm = Groq(api_key=GROQ_API_KEY)
|
| 354 |
-
|
| 355 |
-
chat_completion = llm.chat.completions.create(
|
| 356 |
-
messages=[
|
| 357 |
-
{
|
| 358 |
-
"role": "user",
|
| 359 |
-
"content": final_report_prompt[:5000],
|
| 360 |
-
}
|
| 361 |
-
],
|
| 362 |
-
model="llama-3.3-70b-versatile",
|
| 363 |
-
)
|
| 364 |
-
response = chat_completion.choices[0].message.content
|
| 365 |
|
| 366 |
return response
|
| 367 |
|
| 368 |
|
| 369 |
-
def translate(report
|
| 370 |
translation_prompt = f"""
|
| 371 |
Translate the following corporate sentiment analysis report into Hindi:
|
| 372 |
|
|
@@ -374,33 +289,8 @@ def translate(report, model_provider = "Groq"):
|
|
| 374 |
|
| 375 |
Ensure the translation maintains professional tone and structure while accurately conveying key insights and details.
|
| 376 |
"""
|
| 377 |
-
|
| 378 |
-
|
| 379 |
-
messages=[
|
| 380 |
-
{
|
| 381 |
-
'role': 'user',
|
| 382 |
-
'content': translation_prompt
|
| 383 |
-
}
|
| 384 |
-
],
|
| 385 |
-
model='llama3.2:3b'
|
| 386 |
-
)
|
| 387 |
-
response = translation.message.content
|
| 388 |
-
|
| 389 |
-
else:
|
| 390 |
-
translation_llm = Groq(api_key=GROQ_API_KEY)
|
| 391 |
-
|
| 392 |
-
chat_completion = translation_llm.chat.completions.create(
|
| 393 |
-
messages=[
|
| 394 |
-
{
|
| 395 |
-
"role": "user",
|
| 396 |
-
"content": translation_prompt[:5000],
|
| 397 |
-
}
|
| 398 |
-
],
|
| 399 |
-
model="llama-3.3-70b-versatile",
|
| 400 |
-
)
|
| 401 |
-
response = chat_completion.choices[0].message.content
|
| 402 |
-
|
| 403 |
-
return response
|
| 404 |
|
| 405 |
|
| 406 |
def text_to_speech(text):
|
|
@@ -447,9 +337,10 @@ if st.button("Fetch Sentiment Data"):
|
|
| 447 |
st.error("No sources found.")
|
| 448 |
else:
|
| 449 |
sentiment_output = [
|
| 450 |
-
analyze_sentiment(article
|
| 451 |
for article in web_results["sources"][:5]
|
| 452 |
]
|
|
|
|
| 453 |
logger.info(f"Generating comparative sentiment")
|
| 454 |
comparative_sentiment = generate_comparative_sentiment(sentiment_output)
|
| 455 |
|
|
@@ -463,15 +354,13 @@ if st.button("Fetch Sentiment Data"):
|
|
| 463 |
positive_summary,
|
| 464 |
negative_summary,
|
| 465 |
neutral_summary,
|
| 466 |
-
comparative_sentiment
|
| 467 |
-
model_provider = "Groq"
|
| 468 |
-
|
| 469 |
)
|
| 470 |
|
| 471 |
logger.info(f"Translating Report")
|
| 472 |
-
hindi_translation = translate(final_report
|
| 473 |
|
| 474 |
-
logger.info(f"Generating Speech from Text")
|
| 475 |
#audio_data = text_to_speech(hindi_translation)
|
| 476 |
|
| 477 |
output_dict = {
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
from pydantic import BaseModel
|
| 7 |
from ollama import chat
|
| 8 |
from dotenv import load_dotenv
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
import instructor
|
| 10 |
import logging
|
| 11 |
from together import Together
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
logging.basicConfig(level=logging.INFO, format='%(asctime)s - %(levelname)s - %(message)s')
|
| 16 |
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
+
|
| 19 |
ELEVEN_LABS_API_KEY = "sk_cc3fea7dcfd81744dcc51673fcd011e7315d4732bab408a7"
|
| 20 |
TAVILY_API_KEY = "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"
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
load_dotenv()
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
+
def call_llm(prompt):
|
| 25 |
+
client = Together(api_key = "aa77adf5b5adaefe8fb3e4a5a1e9bb4937ba9d5d362e03de2521631ab9dab07f")
|
| 26 |
+
response = client.chat.completions.create(
|
| 27 |
+
model="meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct-Turbo",
|
| 28 |
+
messages=[
|
| 29 |
+
{
|
| 30 |
+
"role": "user",
|
| 31 |
+
"content": prompt
|
| 32 |
+
}
|
| 33 |
+
]
|
| 34 |
+
)
|
| 35 |
+
response = response.choices[0].message.content
|
| 36 |
+
|
| 37 |
+
return response
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
def fetch_from_web(query):
|
| 40 |
tavily_client = TavilyClient(api_key=TAVILY_API_KEY)
|
|
|
|
| 55 |
sentiment: Literal['positive', 'negative', 'neutral']
|
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
|
| 58 |
+
def analyze_sentiment(article):
|
| 59 |
sentiment_prompt = f"""
|
| 60 |
Analyze the following news article about a company:
|
| 61 |
|
|
|
|
| 78 |
"""
|
| 79 |
|
| 80 |
try:
|
| 81 |
+
client = Together(api_key = "aa77adf5b5adaefe8fb3e4a5a1e9bb4937ba9d5d362e03de2521631ab9dab07f")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 82 |
|
| 83 |
+
extract = client.chat.completions.create(
|
| 84 |
+
messages=[
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 85 |
{
|
| 86 |
"role": "user",
|
| 87 |
"content": sentiment_prompt,
|
| 88 |
},
|
| 89 |
],
|
| 90 |
+
model="meta-llama/Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct-Turbo",
|
| 91 |
response_format={
|
| 92 |
"type": "json_object",
|
| 93 |
"schema": Sentiment.model_json_schema(),
|
| 94 |
},
|
| 95 |
)
|
| 96 |
|
| 97 |
+
output = json.loads(extract.choices[0].message.content)
|
| 98 |
|
| 99 |
+
final_dict = {
|
| 100 |
"title": article["title"],
|
| 101 |
+
"summary": output.get("summary"),
|
| 102 |
+
"reasoning": output.get("reasoning"),
|
| 103 |
+
"topics": output.get("topics"),
|
| 104 |
+
"sentiment": output.get("sentiment")
|
| 105 |
}
|
| 106 |
|
| 107 |
return final_dict
|
|
|
|
| 192 |
return pos_sum, neg_sum, neutral_sum
|
| 193 |
|
| 194 |
|
| 195 |
+
def comparative_analysis(pos_sum, neg_sum, neutral_sum):
|
| 196 |
prompt = f"""
|
| 197 |
+
Perform a detailed comparative analysis of the sentiment across three categories of articles (Positive, Negative, and Neutral) about a specific company. Address the following aspects:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 198 |
|
| 199 |
+
1. **Sentiment Breakdown**: Identify how each category (positive, negative, and neutral) portrays the company. Highlight the language, tone, and emotional cues that shape the sentiment.
|
| 200 |
|
| 201 |
+
2. **Key Themes and Topics**: Compare the primary themes and narratives within each sentiment group. What aspects of the company's operations, performance, or reputation does each category focus on?
|
| 202 |
|
| 203 |
+
3. **Perceived Company Image**: Analyze how each sentiment type influences public perception of the company. What impression is created by positive vs. negative vs. neutral coverage?
|
| 204 |
|
| 205 |
+
4. **Bias and Framing**: Evaluate whether any of the articles reflect explicit biases or specific agendas regarding the company. Are there patterns in how the company is framed across different sentiments?
|
| 206 |
|
| 207 |
+
5. **Market or Stakeholder Impact**: Discuss potential effects on stakeholders (e.g., investors, customers, regulators) based on the sentiment of each article type.
|
| 208 |
|
| 209 |
+
6. **Comparative Insights**: Provide a concise summary of the major differences and commonalities between the three sentiment groups. What overall narrative emerges about the company?
|
|
|
|
| 210 |
|
| 211 |
+
### Positive Articles:
|
| 212 |
+
{pos_sum}
|
| 213 |
|
| 214 |
+
### Negative Articles:
|
| 215 |
+
{neg_sum}
|
|
|
|
| 216 |
|
| 217 |
+
### Neutral Articles:
|
| 218 |
+
{neutral_sum}
|
| 219 |
+
"""
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 220 |
|
| 221 |
+
output = call_llm(prompt)
|
| 222 |
+
return output
|
| 223 |
|
| 224 |
+
def generate_final_report(pos_sum, neg_sum, neutral_sum, comparative_sentiment):
|
| 225 |
final_report_prompt = f"""
|
| 226 |
+
Corporate News Sentiment Analysis Report:
|
| 227 |
+
|
| 228 |
+
### 1. Executive Summary
|
| 229 |
+
- Overview of sentiment distribution: {comparative_sentiment["Sentiment Distribution"]['Positive']} positive, {comparative_sentiment["Sentiment Distribution"]['Negative']} negative, {comparative_sentiment["Sentiment Distribution"]['Neutral']} neutral.
|
| 230 |
+
- Highlight the dominant narrative shaping the company's perception.
|
| 231 |
+
- Summarize key drivers behind positive and negative sentiments.
|
| 232 |
+
|
| 233 |
+
### 2. Media Coverage Analysis
|
| 234 |
+
- Identify major news sources covering the company.
|
| 235 |
+
- Highlight patterns in coverage across platforms (e.g., frequency, timing).
|
| 236 |
+
- Identify whether media sentiment shifts over time.
|
| 237 |
+
|
| 238 |
+
### 3. Sentiment Breakdown
|
| 239 |
+
- **Positive Sentiment:**
|
| 240 |
+
* Titles and sources: {pos_sum}
|
| 241 |
+
* Key themes, notable quotes, and focal areas (e.g., product, leadership).
|
| 242 |
+
- **Negative Sentiment:**
|
| 243 |
+
* Titles and sources: {neg_sum}
|
| 244 |
+
* Key themes, notable quotes, and areas of concern.
|
| 245 |
+
- **Neutral Sentiment:**
|
| 246 |
+
* Titles and sources: {neutral_sum}
|
| 247 |
+
* Key themes and neutral narratives.
|
| 248 |
+
|
| 249 |
+
### 4. Narrative Analysis
|
| 250 |
+
- Identify primary storylines about the company.
|
| 251 |
+
- Analyze how the company is positioned (positive, neutral, negative).
|
| 252 |
+
- Detect shifts or emerging narratives over time.
|
| 253 |
+
|
| 254 |
+
### 5. Key Drivers of Sentiment
|
| 255 |
+
- Identify specific events, announcements, or actions driving media sentiment.
|
| 256 |
+
- Evaluate sentiment linked to industry trends vs. company-specific factors.
|
| 257 |
+
- Highlight company strengths and weaknesses based on media portrayal.
|
| 258 |
+
|
| 259 |
+
### 6. Competitive Context
|
| 260 |
+
- Identify competitor comparisons.
|
| 261 |
+
- Analyze how media sentiment about the company compares to industry standards.
|
| 262 |
+
- Highlight competitive advantages or concerns raised by the media.
|
| 263 |
+
|
| 264 |
+
### 7. Stakeholder Perspective
|
| 265 |
+
- Identify how key stakeholders (e.g., investors, customers, regulators) are represented.
|
| 266 |
+
- Analyze stakeholder concerns and reputation risks/opportunities.
|
| 267 |
+
|
| 268 |
+
### 8. Recommendations
|
| 269 |
+
- Suggest strategies to mitigate negative sentiment.
|
| 270 |
+
- Recommend approaches to amplify positive narratives.
|
| 271 |
+
- Provide messaging suggestions for future announcements.
|
| 272 |
+
|
| 273 |
+
### 9. Appendix
|
| 274 |
+
- Full article details (title, publication, date, author, URL).
|
| 275 |
+
- Sentiment scoring methodology.
|
| 276 |
+
- Media monitoring metrics (reach, engagement, etc.).
|
| 277 |
+
"""
|
| 278 |
+
|
| 279 |
+
response = call_llm(final_report_prompt)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 280 |
|
| 281 |
return response
|
| 282 |
|
| 283 |
|
| 284 |
+
def translate(report):
|
| 285 |
translation_prompt = f"""
|
| 286 |
Translate the following corporate sentiment analysis report into Hindi:
|
| 287 |
|
|
|
|
| 289 |
|
| 290 |
Ensure the translation maintains professional tone and structure while accurately conveying key insights and details.
|
| 291 |
"""
|
| 292 |
+
translation = call_llm(translation_prompt)
|
| 293 |
+
return translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 294 |
|
| 295 |
|
| 296 |
def text_to_speech(text):
|
|
|
|
| 337 |
st.error("No sources found.")
|
| 338 |
else:
|
| 339 |
sentiment_output = [
|
| 340 |
+
analyze_sentiment(article)
|
| 341 |
for article in web_results["sources"][:5]
|
| 342 |
]
|
| 343 |
+
sentiment_output = [s for s in sentiment_output if s is not None]
|
| 344 |
logger.info(f"Generating comparative sentiment")
|
| 345 |
comparative_sentiment = generate_comparative_sentiment(sentiment_output)
|
| 346 |
|
|
|
|
| 354 |
positive_summary,
|
| 355 |
negative_summary,
|
| 356 |
neutral_summary,
|
| 357 |
+
comparative_sentiment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 358 |
)
|
| 359 |
|
| 360 |
logger.info(f"Translating Report")
|
| 361 |
+
hindi_translation = translate(final_report)
|
| 362 |
|
| 363 |
+
#logger.info(f"Generating Speech from Text")
|
| 364 |
#audio_data = text_to_speech(hindi_translation)
|
| 365 |
|
| 366 |
output_dict = {
|