Text,nbcd
"Patient diagnosed at age 69. with a tumor of size 26.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Circular. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 69 years old. with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Crushed stone-like. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"The patient, aged 69, was diagnosed. with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Crushed stone-like. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Stellate. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was Circular. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 5.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive. Histological extent was no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Circular. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 68.0 years old with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Stellate. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 2.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Casting. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 68.0 years old with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive. Histological extent was no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was Circular. The detection mode was screen-detected.",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Stellate. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 69.0 years old with a tumor of size 60.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was Circular. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 69.0 years old with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Crushed stone-like. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 68.0 years old with a tumor of size 21.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Stellate. The detection mode was interval cancer.",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Circular. The detection mode was screen-detected.",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Circular. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Stellate. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 68.0 years old with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Stellate. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 24.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Circular. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Stellate. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Circular. The detection mode was refuser.",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Stellate. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 68.0 years old with a tumor of size 33.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Circular. The detection mode was interval cancer.",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Circular. The detection mode was interval cancer.",0
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 68.0 years old with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Architecture distortion. The detection mode was interval cancer.",0
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 67.0 years old with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Casting. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 24.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Circular. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Stellate. The detection mode was screen-detected.",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Circular. The detection mode was screen-detected.",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 5.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Stellate. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Architecture distortion. The detection mode was refuser.",1
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 69.0 years old with a tumor of size 40.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was Architecture distortion. The detection mode was refuser.",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Circular. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Circular. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Circular. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 68.0 years old with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Circular. The detection mode was interval cancer.",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Stellate. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 67.0 years old with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Stellate. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 69.0 years old with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Architecture distortion. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 66.0 years old with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive. Histological extent was no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Crushed stone-like. The detection mode was interval cancer.",0
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 68.0 years old with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Stellate. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 67.0 years old with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Stellate. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Crushed stone-like. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 69.0 years old with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Architecture distortion. The detection mode was screen-detected.",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was Circular. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 66.0 years old with a tumor of size 90.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Architecture distortion. The detection mode was refuser.",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 35.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Stellate. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 67.0 years old with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive. Histological extent was no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was Stellate. The detection mode was interval cancer.",1
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 68.0 years old with a tumor of size 97.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Crushed stone-like. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Stellate. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Circular. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Architecture distortion. The detection mode was interval cancer.",1
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 69.0 years old with a tumor of size 24.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Powdery. The detection mode was interval cancer.",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 5.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Stellate. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 68.0 years old with a tumor of size 38.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Architecture distortion. The detection mode was interval cancer.",0
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 68.0 years old with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Circular. The detection mode was refuser.",0
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 68.0 years old with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Stellate. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 66.0 years old with a tumor of size nanmm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive. Histological extent was no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Circular. The detection mode was refuser.",0
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 69.0 years old with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Stellate. The detection mode was interval cancer.",0
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 69.0 years old with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Crushed stone-like. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 69.0 years old with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Powdery. The detection mode was refuser.",0
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 69.0 years old with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was Circular. The detection mode was interval cancer.",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was Casting. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 69.0 years old with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Circular. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 35.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Stellate. The detection mode was refuser.",1
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 68.0 years old with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Circular. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 64.0 years old with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Circular. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 66.0 years old with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Circular. The detection mode was interval cancer.",0
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 69.0 years old with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Circular. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 69.0 years old with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Stellate. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 64.0 years old with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Stellate. The detection mode was interval cancer.",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Architecture distortion. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 2.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Casting. The detection mode was interval cancer.",0
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 65.0 years old with a tumor of size 24.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Circular. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was positive. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Circular. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 64.0 years old with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Stellate. The detection mode was screen-detected.",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Casting. The detection mode was screen-detected.",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was positive. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Stellate. The detection mode was refuser.",1
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 66.0 years old with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Crushed stone-like. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Stellate. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Stellate. The detection mode was interval cancer.",0
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 64.0 years old with a tumor of size 50.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Architecture distortion. The detection mode was screen-detected.",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 27.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was Circular. The detection mode was refuser.",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Stellate. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 65.0 years old with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Architecture distortion. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 66.0 years old with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Architecture distortion. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 67.0 years old with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Crushed stone-like. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Circular. The detection mode was interval cancer.",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Circular. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Stellate. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 66.0 years old with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive. Histological extent was no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was Circular. The detection mode was interval cancer.",1
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 65.0 years old with a tumor of size 27.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive. Histological extent was no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was Architecture distortion. The detection mode was interval cancer.",1
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 69.0 years old with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Casting. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was positive. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Casting. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 23.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Circular. The detection mode was interval cancer.",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Architecture distortion. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 65.0 years old with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Circular. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 65.0 years old with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Circular. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Stellate. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"The diagnosis was made when the patient was 66.0 years old with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive. Histological extent was yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was Architecture distortion. The detection mode was screen-detected.",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 40.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 4.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 24.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 5.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 32.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 24.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 1.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 26.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 54.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 24.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 55.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 1.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 4.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 44.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 35.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 4.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 21.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 24.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 21.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 2.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 35.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 2.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 35.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 21.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 4.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 5.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 21.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 23.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 27.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 28.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 28.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 23.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 21.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 40.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 21.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 65.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 5.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 21.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 50.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 35.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 45.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 21.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 5.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 5.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 26.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 28.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 5.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 28.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 39.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 21.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 5.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 50.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 35.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 27.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 40.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 4.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 28.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 40.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 34.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 26.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 27.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 40.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 35.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 1.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 24.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 35.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 24.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 35.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 26.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 44.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 21.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 45.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 60.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 35.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 32.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 29.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 1.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 4.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 60.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 28.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 27.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 35.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 26.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 21.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 28.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 21.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 23.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 4.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 35.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 3.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 23.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 60.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 40.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 5.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 48.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 45.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 5.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 24.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 21.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 35.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 42.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 60.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 23.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 5.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 40.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 23.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 28.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 42.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 23.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 28.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 24.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 3.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 21.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 41.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 28.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 24.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 28.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 60.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 42.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 2.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 26.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 24.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 31.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 45.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 35.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 21.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 2.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 50.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 23.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 50.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 55.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 3.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 40.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 2.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 35.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 3.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 1.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 99.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 5.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 45.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 27.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 40.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 40.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 40.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 3.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 4.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 21.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 60.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 23.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 1.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 24.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 33.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 5.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 5.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 28.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 40.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 21.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 2.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 4.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 35.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 21.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 29.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 31.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 85.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 33.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 23.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 28.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 48.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 23.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 27.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 23.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 32.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 21.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 3.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 24.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 21.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 26.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 45.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 28.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 27.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 37.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 35.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 100.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 45.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 34.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 28.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 24.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 35.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 5.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 31.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 60.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 21.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 24.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 3.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 40.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 27.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 55.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 60.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 3.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 5.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 34.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 21.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 5.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 24.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 21.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 45.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 60.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 5.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 140.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 5.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 5.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 60.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 21.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 70.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 23.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 33.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 28.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 75.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 40.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 60.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 40.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 21.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 23.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size -1.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 23.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 24.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 120.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 35.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 60.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 183.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 37.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 35.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 5.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 31.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 70.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 24.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 21.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 31.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 32.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 36.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 26.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 40.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 1.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 98.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 23.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 35.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 40.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 4.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 36.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 2.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 35.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 60.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 35.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 26.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 45.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 36.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 5.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 21.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 32.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 4.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 60.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 60.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 24.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 21.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 80.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 21.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 5.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 38.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 33.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 34.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 5.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 35.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 40.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 65.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 27.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 32.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 65.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 24.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 3.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 29.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 166.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 50.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 26.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 21.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 56.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 29.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 1.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 161.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 29.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 69.0 with a tumor of size 4.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 21.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 24.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 50.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 21.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 5.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 26.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 5.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 4.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 28.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 4.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 45.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 40.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 35.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 4.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 24.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 32.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 4.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 5.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 24.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 24.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 28.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 68.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 5.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 40.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 23.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 21.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 3.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 85.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 23.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 24.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 23.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 2.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size 27.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 3.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 67.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 38.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 5.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 1.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 24.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 21.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 23.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 26.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 3.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 31.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size 32.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 23.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 24.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 40.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 3.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 35.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 33.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 32.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 5.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 44.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 27.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 65.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 33.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 43.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 38.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 40.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 37.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 35.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 352.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size 32.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 5.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 35.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 40.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 27.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 43.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 66.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 26.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 35.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 23.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 36.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 3.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 5.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 55.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 60.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 2.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 42.0 with a tumor of size 33.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 23.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 27.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 42.0 with a tumor of size 27.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 43.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 80.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 42.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 27.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 21.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 36.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 80.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 65.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 29.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 23.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 42.0 with a tumor of size 60.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 27.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 42.0 with a tumor of size 3.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 42.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 21.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 23.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 26.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 45.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 5.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 28.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 4.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 43.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 27.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 43.0 with a tumor of size 27.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 41.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 63.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 64.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 32.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 41.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 45.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 2.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size 5.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 41.0 with a tumor of size 26.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 21.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 5.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 42.0 with a tumor of size 29.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 33.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 40.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 24.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 26.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 21.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 34.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 90.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 28.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 41.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 42.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 5.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 41.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 60.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 41.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 26.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 21.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 42.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 41.0 with a tumor of size 29.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 42.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 28.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 4.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 29.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 41.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 41.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 29.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 4.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 23.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 35.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 28.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 3.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 5.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 62.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 60.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 28.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 60.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 32.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 43.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 21.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 70.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 35.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 28.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 43.0 with a tumor of size 43.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 40.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 40.0 with a tumor of size 40.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 40.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 40.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 47.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 43.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 61.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 42.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 40.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 23.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 21.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 27.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 41.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 40.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 62.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 35.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 29.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 28.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 40.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 29.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 60.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 1.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 58.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 35.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 23.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 43.0 with a tumor of size 24.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 85.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 45.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 40.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 5.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 24.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 42.0 with a tumor of size 2.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 40.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 29.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 59.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 75.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 40.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 5.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 70.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 3.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 21.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 26.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 53.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 43.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 23.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 5.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 35.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 32.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 1.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 42.0 with a tumor of size 28.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 55.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 5.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 33.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 40.0 with a tumor of size 26.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 54.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 3.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 57.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 42.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size 4.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 26.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 40.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 41.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 37.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 29.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 23.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 43.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 40.0 with a tumor of size 24.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 42.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 42.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 26.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 41.0 with a tumor of size 26.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 42.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 70.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 3.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 56.0 with a tumor of size 40.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 57.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 42.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 26.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 40.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 42.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 29.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 24.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 32.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 41.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 33.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 42.0 with a tumor of size 5.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 23.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 58.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 42.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 43.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 43.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 40.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 23.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 32.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 55.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 41.0 with a tumor of size 32.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 43.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 31.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 42.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 120.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 43.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 42.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size 35.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 40.0 with a tumor of size 27.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 2.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 41.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 54.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 40.0 with a tumor of size 55.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 40.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 43.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 3.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 34.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 42.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 53.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 23.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 21.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 26.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 34.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 2.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size 27.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 41.0 with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 43.0 with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 56.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 40.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 42.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 26.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 43.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 29.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 3.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 41.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 43.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 35.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 50.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 27.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 43.0 with a tumor of size 23.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 42.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 41.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 41.0 with a tumor of size 28.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 26.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 52.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 42.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 55.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 35.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 42.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 40.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 41.0 with a tumor of size 5.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size 33.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 31.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 42.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 43.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size 74.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 40.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 41.0 with a tumor of size 52.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 29.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 42.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 28.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 23.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size 35.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 42.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 51.0 with a tumor of size 23.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 41.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 43.0 with a tumor of size 23.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 32.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 41.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 35.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 50.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 50.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 41.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 40.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 40.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 3.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 40.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 43.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 43.0 with a tumor of size 23.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 43.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 41.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 42.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size 5.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 1.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 49.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 42.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 42.0 with a tumor of size 29.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 41.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 42.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 40.0 with a tumor of size 24.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 42.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 42.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 14.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 43.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 40.0 with a tumor of size 35.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 48.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 41.0 with a tumor of size 40.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",1
"Patient diagnosed at age 41.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 41.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 31.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 43.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 41.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 28.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 21.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 41.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 47.0 with a tumor of size 60.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size 38.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 41.0 with a tumor of size 0.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 43.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 46.0 with a tumor of size 55.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size 21.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 43.0 with a tumor of size 8.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 43.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 41.0 with a tumor of size 25.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 43.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 21.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 30.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 45.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 43.0 with a tumor of size 17.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 40.0 with a tumor of size 11.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 40.0 with a tumor of size 6.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 42.0 with a tumor of size 2.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size 15.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 40.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 43.0 with a tumor of size 31.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 42.0 with a tumor of size 10.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 40.0 with a tumor of size 1.0mm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 42.0 with a tumor of size 13.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 42.0 with a tumor of size 19.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 41.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 6.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 43.0 with a tumor of size 7.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 41.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 40.0 with a tumor of size 23.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 41.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 44.0 with a tumor of size 9.0mm, grade 1.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 41.0 with a tumor of size 5.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 40.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 42.0 with a tumor of size 12.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 42.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 2.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 40.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 5.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 42.0 with a tumor of size 22.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 40.0 with a tumor of size 29.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 41.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 41.0 with a tumor of size 18.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was interval cancer. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 41.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 40.0 with a tumor of size 32.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 1.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 41.0 with a tumor of size nanmm, grade nan. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 41.0 with a tumor of size 16.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was positive, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 4.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 40.0 with a tumor of size 27.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was negative, with histological extent being no. Estrogen receptor (ER) was positive, progesterone receptor (PR) was positive, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was negative. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was refuser. ",0
"Patient diagnosed at age 40.0 with a tumor of size 20.0mm, grade 3.0. Node involvement was positive, with histological extent being yes. Estrogen receptor (ER) was negative, progesterone receptor (PR) was negative, HER2 status was negative, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was positive. The mammography appearance was 2.0, and detection mode was screen-detected. ",0