{ "schema_version": 1, "title": "Reproduction: Global Convergence of Adaptive Sensing for Principal Eigenvector Estimation", "emoji": "🔬", "space_id": "snaykey/repro-adaptive-sensing-eigenvector", "paper": { "openreview_id": "XXYhEGXPPF", "arxiv_id": "2505.10882" }, "tags": [ "icml2026-repro", "paper-XXYhEGXPPF" ], "updated_at": "2026-07-22T18:00:00Z", "root": { "slug": "index", "title": "Reproduction: Global Convergence of Adaptive Sensing for Principal Eigenvector Estimation", "file": "pages/index.md", "children": [ { "slug": "executive-summary", "title": "Executive summary", "file": "pages/executive-summary/page.md", "children": [] }, { "slug": "claim-1-theorem-1-convergence", "title": "Theorem 1 (informal) shows the adaptive sensing algorithm reaches constant-level alignment with the true eigenvector after O(λ₁λ₂d²/Δ²) iterations, after which the sine-squared alignment error decays as O(λ₁λ₂d²/(Δ²t)) (Theorem 1).", "file": "pages/claim-1-theorem-1-convergence/page.md", "children": [] }, { "slug": "claim-2-theorem-2-warmup", "title": "Theorem 2 (formal) specifies a warmup phase of t₀ = (4S+1)log(d/2) iterations after which the expected squared sine alignment satisfies E[1-(ūᵀu_{t₀})²] ≤ 0.5, followed by a distinct local convergence phase (Theorem 2).", "file": "pages/claim-2-theorem-2-warmup/page.md", "children": [] }, { "slug": "claim-3-minimax-rate", "title": "The paper's rate matches the minimax lower bound Ω(λ₁λ₂/Δ² · d/t) from Li et al. (2018) up to an extra factor of d, which is attributed to the cost of compressive (two-measurement) sampling (Section 3, Theorem 2).", "file": "pages/claim-3-minimax-rate/page.md", "children": [] }, { "slug": "claim-4-tracking-step-size", "title": "Section 5.1 ('Tracking a Moving Eigenvector') derives a closed-form optimal step size η̂ = √(V/S) and fixed point x* = V + √(VS) for the non-stationary tracking setting (Section 5.1).", "file": "pages/claim-4-tracking-step-size/page.md", "children": [] }, { "slug": "claim-5-figure-1-empirical", "title": "Figure 1 empirically validates the theoretical convergence rate of Algorithm 1 using d=10, Δ=1 across 20 trials, reporting 20th/80th percentile error bars (Figure 1).", "file": "pages/claim-5-figure-1-empirical/page.md", "children": [] }, { "slug": "conclusion", "title": "Conclusion", "file": "pages/conclusion/page.md", "children": [] } ] } }