Spaces:
Running
Running
| { | |
| "schema_version": 1, | |
| "title": "Reproduction: Corruption-Tolerant Asynchronous Q-Learning with Near-Optimal Rates", | |
| "emoji": "🛡️", | |
| "space_id": "snaykey/repro-async-q-learning", | |
| "paper": { | |
| "openreview_id": "L5ZJv73k7x" | |
| }, | |
| "tags": [ | |
| "icml2026-repro", | |
| "paper-L5ZJv73k7x" | |
| ], | |
| "updated_at": "2026-07-30T16:28:22+00:00", | |
| "root": { | |
| "slug": "index", | |
| "title": "Reproduction: Corruption-Tolerant Asynchronous Q-Learning with Near-Optimal Rates", | |
| "file": "pages/index.md", | |
| "children": [ | |
| { | |
| "slug": "claim-1-theorem-2-rate", | |
| "title": "Theorem 2 shows Robust Async-Q achieves a finite-time convergence rate of O(1/√T), matching classical asynchronous Q-learning, plus an additive O(√ε) term where ε∈[0,1/2) is the fraction of adversarially corrupted rewards (Section 3.1).", | |
| "file": "pages/claim-1-theorem-2-rate/page.md", | |
| "children": [] | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| "slug": "claim-2-theorem-3-lower-bound", | |
| "title": "Theorem 3 gives an information-theoretic lower bound of Ω(√ε), proving the additive corruption term in the upper bound is unavoidable (Section 4).", | |
| "file": "pages/claim-2-theorem-3-lower-bound/page.md", | |
| "children": [] | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| "slug": "claim-3-theorem-4-reward-agnostic", | |
| "title": "Theorem 4 extends the guarantee to a reward-agnostic setting where the algorithm needs no prior knowledge of the reward distribution's bounds (Section 5.1).", | |
| "file": "pages/claim-3-theorem-4-reward-agnostic/page.md", | |
| "children": [] | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| "slug": "claim-4-theorem-6-markovian", | |
| "title": "Theorem 6 extends the near-optimal finite-time rate to single-trajectory Markovian sampling with time-correlated data, with the bound inflated by the chain's mixing time (Section 6).", | |
| "file": "pages/claim-4-theorem-6-markovian/page.md", | |
| "children": [] | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| "slug": "claim-5-algorithm-1", | |
| "title": "Algorithm 1 (Robust Async-Q) combines a trimmed-mean reward estimator with an adaptive threshold G_t to filter corrupted rewards before the standard Q-learning update, requiring only knowledge of the corruption fraction ε and minimum state-action visitation probability λ_min (Algorithm 1, Assumption 1).", | |
| "file": "pages/claim-5-algorithm-1/page.md", | |
| "children": [] | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| "slug": "executive-summary", | |
| "title": "executive-summary", | |
| "file": "pages/executive-summary/page.md", | |
| "children": [] | |
| }, | |
| { | |
| "slug": "conclusion", | |
| "title": "conclusion", | |
| "file": "pages/conclusion/page.md", | |
| "children": [] | |
| } | |
| ] | |
| } | |
| } |