snaykey commited on
Commit
82a33db
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 47bec8c

logbook.json (verbatim titles)

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. logbook.json +63 -0
logbook.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "schema_version": 1,
3
+ "title": "Repro: The (Marginal) Value of a Search Ad — Repeated Second-price Auctions",
4
+ "emoji": "chart",
5
+ "space_id": "snaykey/repro-spa-binary-feedback",
6
+ "paper": {
7
+ "openreview_id": "UflglraWRa"
8
+ },
9
+ "tags": [
10
+ "icml2026-repro",
11
+ "paper-UflglraWRa"
12
+ ],
13
+ "updated_at": "2026-07-25T22:40:00+00:00",
14
+ "root": {
15
+ "slug": "index",
16
+ "title": "Repro: The (Marginal) Value of a Search Ad — Repeated Second-price Auctions",
17
+ "file": "pages/index.md",
18
+ "children": [
19
+ {
20
+ "slug": "executive-summary",
21
+ "title": "Executive summary",
22
+ "file": "pages/executive-summary/page.md",
23
+ "children": []
24
+ },
25
+ {
26
+ "slug": "claim-1-thm1-spa-binary-regret",
27
+ "title": "Under binary feedback, the proposed algorithm for repeated second-price auctions achieves regret O(√(dT) log³T + d log⁵T), where d is the feature dimension and T the horizon (Theorem 1).",
28
+ "file": "pages/claim-1-thm1-spa-binary-regret/page.md",
29
+ "children": []
30
+ },
31
+ {
32
+ "slug": "claim-2-thm2-lower-bound",
33
+ "title": "A matching minimax lower bound of Ω(√(dT)) holds for T ≥ d², even when the bidder has perfect knowledge of the competing-bid CDF (Theorem 2).",
34
+ "file": "pages/claim-2-thm2-lower-bound/page.md",
35
+ "children": []
36
+ },
37
+ {
38
+ "slug": "claim-3-spa-vs-fpa-binary",
39
+ "title": "Under binary feedback, second-price auctions admit Õ(√(dT)) regret while first-price auctions are limited to Õ(T^(2/3)) regret, showing the payment rule strictly improves achievable regret (Section on regret comparison).",
40
+ "file": "pages/claim-3-spa-vs-fpa-binary/page.md",
41
+ "children": []
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "slug": "claim-4-full-info-both-sqrt",
45
+ "title": "Under full-information feedback, both second-price and first-price auctions achieve the same Õ(√(dT)) regret rate, so the SPA advantage is specific to the binary-feedback setting (Section on regret comparison).",
46
+ "file": "pages/claim-4-full-info-both-sqrt/page.md",
47
+ "children": []
48
+ },
49
+ {
50
+ "slug": "claim-5-interval-splitting-hob",
51
+ "title": "Section 3 introduces an interval-splitting technique to estimate the highest-other-bid (HOB) directly from the observed payment in a won second-price auction (Section 3).",
52
+ "file": "pages/claim-5-interval-splitting-hob/page.md",
53
+ "children": []
54
+ },
55
+ {
56
+ "slug": "conclusion",
57
+ "title": "Conclusion",
58
+ "file": "pages/conclusion/page.md",
59
+ "children": []
60
+ }
61
+ ]
62
+ }
63
+ }