Update app.py

app.py

@@ -462,7 +462,7 @@ Example: If a quote starts at word 300, timestamp would be [02:00] (300 words /
                 marked_transcript += word + " "
             transcript = marked_transcript
 
-        prompt_template = """Analyze this teaching content with strict evaluation criteria. Score 1 only if ALL requirements are fully met.
+        prompt_template = """Analyze this teaching content with extremely strict evaluation criteria. Score 1 ONLY if ALL requirements are FULLY met with NO exceptions.
 
 Transcript:
 {transcript}
@@ -474,107 +474,121 @@ Required JSON structure:
 {{
     "Concept Assessment": {{
         "Subject Matter Accuracy": {{
-            "Score": 1,  # Score 1 ONLY if NO factual errors or misconceptions are present
+            "Score": 1,  # Score 1 ONLY if ALL technical information is 100% accurate with NO errors or oversimplifications
             "Citations": ["[MM:SS] Quote demonstrating accuracy or error"]
         }},
         "First Principles Approach": {{
-            "Score": 1,  # Score 1 ONLY if fundamentals are clearly explained BEFORE introducing complex concepts
+            "Score": 1,  # Score 1 ONLY if EVERY concept is built from fundamentals with clear progression
             "Citations": ["[MM:SS] Quote showing fundamental concept explanation"]
         }},
         "Examples and Business Context": {{
-            "Score": 1,  # Score 1 ONLY if MULTIPLE relevant real-world examples are provided
+            "Score": 1,  # Score 1 ONLY if 3+ relevant, detailed real-world examples are provided
             "Citations": ["[MM:SS] Quote containing practical example"]
         }},
         "Cohesive Storytelling": {{
-            "Score": 1,  # Score 1 ONLY if concepts flow logically with clear transitions
+            "Score": 1,  # Score 1 ONLY if ALL transitions are smooth with explicit connections between topics
             "Citations": ["[MM:SS] Quote showing topic transition or connection"]
         }},
         "Engagement and Interaction": {{
-            "Score": 1,  # Score 1 ONLY if MULTIPLE engagement techniques are used effectively
+            "Score": 1,  # Score 1 ONLY if 3+ different engagement techniques are used effectively
             "Citations": ["[MM:SS] Quote showing audience engagement"]
         }},
         "Professional Tone": {{
-            "Score": 1,  # Score 1 ONLY if consistently professional language is maintained
+            "Score": 1,  # Score 1 ONLY if language is consistently professional with NO casual expressions
             "Citations": ["[MM:SS] Quote demonstrating tone"]
         }}
     }},
     "Code Assessment": {{
         "Depth of Explanation": {{
-            "Score": 1,  # Score 1 ONLY if code concepts are explained thoroughly with implementation details
+            "Score": 1,  # Score 1 ONLY if EVERY code concept includes what, why, and implementation details
             "Citations": ["[MM:SS] Quote showing detailed code explanation"]
         }},
         "Output Interpretation": {{
-            "Score": 1,  # Score 1 ONLY if code outputs are explained with their significance
+            "Score": 1,  # Score 1 ONLY if ALL code outputs are explained with their significance and error cases
             "Citations": ["[MM:SS] Quote demonstrating output explanation"]
         }},
         "Breaking down Complexity": {{
-            "Score": 1,  # Score 1 ONLY if complex concepts are broken into manageable parts
+            "Score": 1,  # Score 1 ONLY if ALL complex concepts are broken into clear, logical sub-components
             "Citations": ["[MM:SS] Quote showing concept breakdown"]
         }}
     }}
 }}
 
-Strict Evaluation Criteria:
+Extremely Strict Evaluation Criteria:
 
 Concept Assessment:
-1. Subject Matter Accuracy
-   - MUST have zero factual errors or misconceptions
-   - All technical terms used correctly
-   - No oversimplification that leads to incorrect understanding
-
-2. First Principles Approach
-   - MUST explain fundamental concepts before advanced topics
-   - Clear progression from basic to complex ideas
-   - Core concepts defined before being used in explanations
-
-3. Examples and Business Context
-   - MUST include at least 2 relevant real-world examples
-   - Examples should directly relate to the concept
-   - Business context should be clearly explained
-
-4. Cohesive Storytelling
-   - MUST have clear logical flow between topics
-   - Explicit connections between related concepts
-   - Smooth transitions between subjects
-   - No abrupt topic changes
-
-5. Engagement and Interaction
-   - MUST use at least 2 different engagement techniques
-   - Rhetorical questions or direct audience involvement
+1. Subject Matter Accuracy (Must meet ALL):
+   - Zero factual errors or technical inaccuracies
+   - No oversimplifications that could lead to misconceptions
+   - All technical terms used with precise definitions
+   - Complete and accurate explanations of all concepts
+   - Clear distinction between facts and opinions
+
+2. First Principles Approach (Must meet ALL):
+   - Every concept explicitly built from fundamental principles
+   - Clear progression from basic to advanced concepts
+   - No assumptions about prior knowledge
+   - Each building block thoroughly explained
+   - Logical sequence of concept introduction
+
+3. Examples and Business Context (Must meet ALL):
+   - Minimum 3 detailed, relevant real-world examples
+   - Each example directly tied to concept being taught
+   - Clear business value explanation for each example
+   - Practical implementation considerations discussed
+   - Industry-specific applications highlighted
+
+4. Cohesive Storytelling (Must meet ALL):
+   - Explicit connections between all related concepts
+   - Clear narrative thread throughout presentation
+   - Smooth transitions between all topics
+   - No unexplained topic jumps
+   - Consistent story arc from start to finish
+
+5. Engagement and Interaction (Must meet ALL):
+   - Minimum 3 different engagement techniques used
+   - Direct audience involvement opportunities
    - Clear checks for understanding
    - Interactive elements in presentation
+   - Varied teaching methods demonstrated
 
-6. Professional Tone
-   - MUST maintain consistent professional language
-   - No casual or inappropriate expressions
+6. Professional Tone (Must meet ALL):
+   - Zero casual or colloquial expressions
+   - Consistent technical vocabulary
    - Clear and confident delivery
-   - Appropriate technical vocabulary
+   - Appropriate level of formality
+   - No filler words or hesitations
 
 Code Assessment:
-1. Depth of Explanation
-   - MUST explain both what code does AND why
-   - Implementation details clearly covered
-   - Key programming concepts explained
-   - Important design decisions justified
-
-2. Output Interpretation
-   - MUST explain significance of all outputs
-   - Clear connection between code and results
-   - Error cases covered
+1. Depth of Explanation (Must meet ALL):
+   - Every code concept explains what, why, and how
+   - Implementation details thoroughly covered
+   - Design decisions explicitly justified
+   - Performance implications discussed
+   - Best practices highlighted
+
+2. Output Interpretation (Must meet ALL):
+   - All code outputs explained with significance
+   - Error cases and edge cases covered
    - Expected vs actual results discussed
+   - Output validation methods explained
+   - Debugging approaches covered
 
-3. Breaking down Complexity
-   - MUST divide complex topics into clear sub-components
+3. Breaking down Complexity (Must meet ALL):
+   - All complex concepts divided into clear sub-components
    - Step-by-step explanation of difficult concepts
    - Clear progression in complexity
    - Logical organization of technical content
+   - Dependencies and relationships explained
 
 Important:
-- Score 1 ONLY if ALL criteria for that category are met
+- Score 1 ONLY if ALL criteria for that category are fully met
+- ANY missing element results in a score of 0
 - Each citation must include exact timestamp and relevant quote
-- Citations should clearly demonstrate how criteria are/aren't met
-- Be strict and objective in scoring
-- Default to 0 if any doubt about meeting ALL criteria"""
+- Citations must clearly demonstrate how criteria are/aren't met
+- Be extremely strict and objective in scoring
+- When in doubt, score 0
+- No partial credit - all requirements must be met for a score of 1"""
 
         return prompt_template.format(
             transcript=transcript,