Create llmeval.py
Browse files- llmeval.py +90 -0
llmeval.py
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
from groq import Groq
|
| 2 |
+
import re
|
| 3 |
+
import json
|
| 4 |
+
|
| 5 |
+
AK="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"
|
| 6 |
+
client = Groq(api_key=AK)
|
| 7 |
+
|
| 8 |
+
|
| 9 |
+
|
| 10 |
+
|
| 11 |
+
class LLM_as_Evaluator():
|
| 12 |
+
|
| 13 |
+
def __init__(self):
|
| 14 |
+
pass
|
| 15 |
+
|
| 16 |
+
|
| 17 |
+
def ___engine_core(self,messages):
|
| 18 |
+
|
| 19 |
+
completion = client.chat.completions.create(
|
| 20 |
+
model="llama3-8b-8192",
|
| 21 |
+
messages=messages,
|
| 22 |
+
temperature=0.0,
|
| 23 |
+
max_completion_tokens=5000,
|
| 24 |
+
top_p=1,
|
| 25 |
+
stream=False,
|
| 26 |
+
stop=None,
|
| 27 |
+
)
|
| 28 |
+
actual_message=completion.choices[0].message.content
|
| 29 |
+
return actual_message
|
| 30 |
+
#cleaned_json=re.sub(r"```(?:json)?\s*(.*?)\s*```", r"\1", actual_message, flags=re.DOTALL).strip()
|
| 31 |
+
#is_json_like = cleaned_json.strip().startswith("{") and cleaned_json.strip().endswith("}")
|
| 32 |
+
#if is_json_like==True:
|
| 33 |
+
#return cleaned_json
|
| 34 |
+
#else:
|
| 35 |
+
#return "FATAL"
|
| 36 |
+
|
| 37 |
+
|
| 38 |
+
def Paradigm_LLM_Evaluator(self,data_to_evaluate):
|
| 39 |
+
|
| 40 |
+
|
| 41 |
+
SYSTEM='''
|
| 42 |
+
Task:
|
| 43 |
+
Evaluate the biological quality of a prompt-research data-response triplet on a 0–1 continuous scale.
|
| 44 |
+
|
| 45 |
+
Goal:
|
| 46 |
+
Assess:
|
| 47 |
+
|
| 48 |
+
Whether the Prompt is clear, biologically specific, and aligned with the Research Data.
|
| 49 |
+
|
| 50 |
+
Whether the Response is biologically relevant, mechanistically coherent, and experimentally actionable based on the Research Data.
|
| 51 |
+
|
| 52 |
+
Scoring Guide (0–1 continuous scale):
|
| 53 |
+
|
| 54 |
+
Score 1.0 if:
|
| 55 |
+
|
| 56 |
+
Prompt is clear, biologically detailed, and correctly aligned to the research context.
|
| 57 |
+
|
| 58 |
+
Response correctly identifies a biologically valid paradigm consistent with the Research Data.
|
| 59 |
+
|
| 60 |
+
Lower scores if:
|
| 61 |
+
|
| 62 |
+
The prompt is vague or misaligned.
|
| 63 |
+
|
| 64 |
+
The response is biologically inaccurate, irrelevant, or mechanistically implausible.
|
| 65 |
+
|
| 66 |
+
EXAMPLE:
|
| 67 |
+
Input:
|
| 68 |
+
Prompt: Identify a paradigm explaining the functional impact of BRCA1 mutations in ovarian cancer, focusing on DNA repair mechanisms.
|
| 69 |
+
Research Data: BRCA1 loss-of-function mutations are associated with impaired homologous recombination repair, leading to genomic instability in ovarian epithelial cells.
|
| 70 |
+
Agent's Response: BRCA1 mutations inhibit non-homologous end joining, which causes increased apoptosis in neurons, suggesting a neurodegeneration model.
|
| 71 |
+
|
| 72 |
+
Your output must begin with Score: and contain only two fields: Score: and Reasoning:. No extra commentary, no markdown, no explanations before or after.:
|
| 73 |
+
Score: 0.3
|
| 74 |
+
Reasoning: The prompt and research data focus on ovarian cancer and homologous recombination, but the response incorrectly shifts to neurons and the wrong DNA repair pathway (non-homologous end joining instead of homologous recombination). Misalignment between response and biological context.
|
| 75 |
+
|
| 76 |
+
|
| 77 |
+
Think step by step
|
| 78 |
+
'''
|
| 79 |
+
messages=[
|
| 80 |
+
{"role":"system","content":SYSTEM},
|
| 81 |
+
{"role":"user","content":f"""
|
| 82 |
+
Prompt:{data_to_evaluate["prompt"]},
|
| 83 |
+
Reseaerch Data :{data_to_evaluate["research"]},
|
| 84 |
+
Agent's Response:{data_to_evaluate["response"]}
|
| 85 |
+
|
| 86 |
+
"""}
|
| 87 |
+
]
|
| 88 |
+
|
| 89 |
+
evaluation_response=self.___engine_core(messages=messages)
|
| 90 |
+
return evaluation_response
|