Spaces:
Sleeping
Sleeping
File size: 26,485 Bytes
bf35c89 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 |
# -----------------------------------------------------------------
# Comprehensive Evaluation System for RAG vs Fine-Tuning Comparison
# Implements detailed testing, evaluation, and analysis
# -----------------------------------------------------------------
# -------------------
# Importing libraries
# -------------------
import time
import json
import logging
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
import seaborn as sns
from pathlib import Path
from datetime import datetime
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from typing import List, Dict, Tuple, Optional
from data_processor import FinancialDataProcessor
from rag_system import RAGSystem, InputGuardrail, OutputGuardrail
from fine_tune_system import FineTunedSystem, ModelEvaluator, TrainingConfig
logging.basicConfig(level=logging.INFO)
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
class ComprehensiveEvaluator:
"""Comprehensive evaluation system for RAG vs Fine-tuning comparison"""
def __init__(self):
self.results = {
'rag': [],
'fine_tuned': [],
'comparison': {}
}
self.test_questions = []
self.ground_truth = []
self.evaluation_metrics = {}
def prepare_test_dataset(self, qa_pairs: List[Dict[str, str]]) -> Tuple[List[str], List[str]]:
"""Prepare test dataset from Q&A pairs"""
# ------------------------------------
# Select diverse questions for testing
# ------------------------------------
test_questions = []
ground_truth = []
# -----------------------------------
# Relevant, high-confidence questions
# -----------------------------------
high_conf_questions = [
"What was the company's revenue in 2024?",
"What are the total assets?",
"What type of company is this?",
"What are the main business segments?"
]
# ----------------------------------------------
# Relevant, low-confidence questions (ambiguous)
# ----------------------------------------------
low_conf_questions = [
"How does the company compare to competitors?",
"What are the growth trends?",
"What are the risk factors?"
]
# --------------------
# Irrelevant questions
# --------------------
irrelevant_questions = [
"What is the capital of France?",
"How do you cook pasta?",
"What is the weather like today?"
]
# --------------------------
# Combine all question types
# --------------------------
all_questions = high_conf_questions + low_conf_questions + irrelevant_questions
# -----------------------------------------
# Find corresponding answers from Q&A pairs
# -----------------------------------------
for question in all_questions:
# ----------------------------------------------------
# For relevant questions, try to find matching answers
# ----------------------------------------------------
if question in [qa['question'] for qa in qa_pairs]:
matching_qa = next(qa for qa in qa_pairs if qa['question'] == question)
test_questions.append(question)
ground_truth.append(matching_qa['answer'])
else:
# --------------------------------------------------------
# For questions not in our dataset, use expected responses
# --------------------------------------------------------
if question in high_conf_questions:
test_questions.append(question)
ground_truth.append("This information should be available in the financial statements.")
elif question in low_conf_questions:
test_questions.append(question)
ground_truth.append("This information may be partially available or require interpretation.")
else: # irrelevant questions
test_questions.append(question)
ground_truth.append("This question is not related to financial data.")
return test_questions, ground_truth
def evaluate_rag_system(self, rag_system: RAGSystem, test_questions: List[str]) -> List[Dict]:
"""Evaluate RAG system performance"""
logger.info("Evaluating RAG system...")
rag_results = []
input_guardrail = InputGuardrail()
output_guardrail = OutputGuardrail()
for i, question in enumerate(test_questions):
logger.info(f"RAG Question {i+1}/{len(test_questions)}: {question}")
# ----------------
# Input validation
# ----------------
is_valid, validation_msg = input_guardrail.validate_query(question)
if not is_valid:
rag_results.append({
'question': question,
'method': 'rag',
'answer': f"Query rejected: {validation_msg}",
'confidence': 0.0,
'time': 0.0,
'correct': 'N/A',
'validation_status': 'rejected',
'sources': []
})
continue
# ----------------
# Get RAG response
# ----------------
start_time = time.time()
response = rag_system.answer_question(question)
response_time = time.time() - start_time
# -----------------
# Output validation
# -----------------
is_factual, factuality_msg = output_guardrail.validate_response(
response['answer'], response['confidence']
)
# ----------------------------------------
# Determine correctness (simple heuristic)
# ----------------------------------------
correct = self._determine_correctness(question, response['answer'], 'rag')
result = {
'question': question,
'method': 'rag',
'answer': response['answer'],
'confidence': response['confidence'],
'time': response_time,
'correct': correct,
'validation_status': 'accepted' if is_valid else 'rejected',
'factuality_status': 'factual' if is_factual else 'questionable',
'sources': response.get('sources', []),
'method_used': response.get('method', 'rag')
}
rag_results.append(result)
# ------------------------------------------------
# Add small delay to avoid overwhelming the system
# ------------------------------------------------
time.sleep(0.1)
return rag_results
def evaluate_fine_tuned_system(self, fine_tuned_system: FineTunedSystem,
test_questions: List[str]) -> List[Dict]:
"""Evaluate fine-tuned system performance"""
logger.info("Evaluating Fine-tuned system...")
fine_tuned_results = []
input_guardrail = InputGuardrail()
output_guardrail = OutputGuardrail()
for i, question in enumerate(test_questions):
logger.info(f"Fine-tuned Question {i+1}/{len(test_questions)}: {question}")
# ----------------
# Input validation
# ----------------
is_valid, validation_msg = input_guardrail.validate_query(question)
if not is_valid:
fine_tuned_results.append({
'question': question,
'method': 'fine_tuned',
'answer': f"Query rejected: {validation_msg}",
'confidence': 0.0,
'time': 0.0,
'correct': 'N/A',
'validation_status': 'rejected',
'sources': ['fine_tuned_model']
})
continue
# -----------------------
# Get fine-tuned response
# -----------------------
start_time = time.time()
response = fine_tuned_system.answer_question(question)
response_time = time.time() - start_time
# -----------------
# Output validation
# -----------------
is_factual, factuality_msg = output_guardrail.validate_response(
response['answer'], response['confidence']
)
# ---------------------
# Determine correctness
# ---------------------
correct = self._determine_correctness(question, response['answer'], 'fine_tuned')
result = {
'question': question,
'method': 'fine_tuned',
'answer': response['answer'],
'confidence': response['confidence'],
'time': response_time,
'correct': correct,
'validation_status': 'accepted' if is_valid else 'rejected',
'factuality_status': 'factual' if is_factual else 'questionable',
'sources': response.get('sources', []),
'method_used': response.get('method', 'fine_tuned')
}
fine_tuned_results.append(result)
# ---------------
# Add small delay
# ---------------
time.sleep(0.1)
return fine_tuned_results
def _determine_correctness(self, question: str, answer: str, method: str) -> str:
"""Determine if the answer is correct (Y/N)"""
question_lower = question.lower()
answer_lower = answer.lower()
# --------------------------------------
# Check for rejection or error responses
# --------------------------------------
if any(phrase in answer_lower for phrase in ['rejected', 'cannot answer', 'no information']):
return 'N'
# -------------------------------------------------------------------
# For irrelevant questions, check if system correctly identifies them
# -------------------------------------------------------------------
irrelevant_keywords = ['france', 'pasta', 'weather', 'capital']
if any(keyword in question_lower for keyword in irrelevant_keywords):
if method == 'rag':
# ----------------------------------------
# RAG should ideally say it's not relevant
# ----------------------------------------
if any(phrase in answer_lower for phrase in ['not relevant', 'not related', 'financial']):
return 'Y'
else:
return 'N'
else:
# -------------------------------------
# Fine-tuned might try to answer anyway
# -------------------------------------
return 'N'
# -----------------------------------------------------------------
# For relevant questions, check if answer contains expected content
# -----------------------------------------------------------------
if 'revenue' in question_lower:
if any(phrase in answer_lower for phrase in ['billion', 'million', 'dollar', '$']):
return 'Y'
elif 'assets' in question_lower:
if any(phrase in answer_lower for phrase in ['assets', 'billion', 'million', 'dollar']):
return 'Y'
elif 'company' in question_lower or 'business' in question_lower:
if any(phrase in answer_lower for phrase in ['apple', 'technology', 'smartphone', 'computer']):
return 'Y'
# ----------------------------------------
# Default to correct if we can't determine
# ----------------------------------------
return 'Y'
def calculate_comprehensive_metrics(self, rag_results: List[Dict],
fine_tuned_results: List[Dict]) -> Dict:
"""Calculate comprehensive comparison metrics"""
logger.info("Calculating comprehensive metrics...")
# -----------------------------------------------
# Filter out rejected queries for fair comparison
# -----------------------------------------------
rag_valid = [r for r in rag_results if r['validation_status'] == 'accepted']
fine_tuned_valid = [r for r in fine_tuned_results if r['validation_status'] == 'accepted']
metrics = {
'rag': {
'total_questions': len(rag_results),
'valid_questions': len(rag_valid),
'rejected_questions': len(rag_results) - len(rag_valid),
'avg_confidence': np.mean([r['confidence'] for r in rag_valid]) if rag_valid else 0,
'avg_response_time': np.mean([r['time'] for r in rag_valid]) if rag_valid else 0,
'correct_answers': sum(1 for r in rag_valid if r['correct'] == 'Y'),
'accuracy': sum(1 for r in rag_valid if r['correct'] == 'Y') / len(rag_valid) if rag_valid else 0,
'factual_responses': sum(1 for r in rag_valid if r.get('factuality_status') == 'factual'),
'factuality_rate': sum(1 for r in rag_valid if r.get('factuality_status') == 'factual') / len(rag_valid) if rag_valid else 0
},
'fine_tuned': {
'total_questions': len(fine_tuned_results),
'valid_questions': len(fine_tuned_valid),
'rejected_questions': len(fine_tuned_results) - len(fine_tuned_valid),
'avg_confidence': np.mean([r['confidence'] for r in fine_tuned_valid]) if fine_tuned_valid else 0,
'avg_response_time': np.mean([r['time'] for r in fine_tuned_valid]) if fine_tuned_valid else 0,
'correct_answers': sum(1 for r in fine_tuned_valid if r['correct'] == 'Y'),
'accuracy': sum(1 for r in fine_tuned_valid if r['correct'] == 'Y') / len(fine_tuned_valid) if fine_tuned_valid else 0,
'factual_responses': sum(1 for r in fine_tuned_valid if r.get('factuality_status') == 'factual'),
'factuality_rate': sum(1 for r in fine_tuned_valid if r.get('factuality_status') == 'factual') / len(fine_tuned_valid) if fine_tuned_valid else 0
}
}
# ----------------------
# Calculate improvements
# ----------------------
metrics['improvements'] = {
'accuracy_improvement': metrics['fine_tuned']['accuracy'] - metrics['rag']['accuracy'],
'speed_improvement': metrics['rag']['avg_response_time'] - metrics['fine_tuned']['avg_response_time'],
'confidence_improvement': metrics['fine_tuned']['avg_confidence'] - metrics['rag']['avg_confidence'],
'factuality_improvement': metrics['fine_tuned']['factuality_rate'] - metrics['rag']['factuality_rate']
}
return metrics
def generate_results_table(self, rag_results: List[Dict],
fine_tuned_results: List[Dict]) -> pd.DataFrame:
"""Generate comprehensive results table"""
# ---------------
# Combine results
# ---------------
all_results = []
for rag_result in rag_results:
# ------------------------------------
# Find corresponding fine-tuned result
# ------------------------------------
fine_tuned_result = next(
(r for r in fine_tuned_results if r['question'] == rag_result['question']),
None
)
if fine_tuned_result:
all_results.append({
'Question': rag_result['question'],
'RAG_Answer': rag_result['answer'],
'RAG_Confidence': f"{rag_result['confidence']:.3f}",
'RAG_Time': f"{rag_result['time']:.3f}s",
'RAG_Correct': rag_result['correct'],
'Fine_Tuned_Answer': fine_tuned_result['answer'],
'Fine_Tuned_Confidence': f"{fine_tuned_result['confidence']:.3f}",
'Fine_Tuned_Time': f"{fine_tuned_result['time']:.3f}s",
'Fine_Tuned_Correct': fine_tuned_result['correct']
})
return pd.DataFrame(all_results)
def create_visualizations(self, metrics: Dict, output_dir: str = "evaluation_results"):
"""Create visualization charts for the evaluation results"""
output_path = Path(output_dir)
output_path.mkdir(exist_ok=True)
# ---------
# Set style
# ---------
plt.style.use('seaborn-v0_8')
sns.set_palette("husl")
# ----------------------
# 1. Accuracy Comparison
# ----------------------
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(10, 6))
methods = ['RAG', 'Fine-Tuned']
accuracies = [metrics['rag']['accuracy'], metrics['fine_tuned']['accuracy']]
bars = ax.bar(methods, accuracies, color=['skyblue', 'lightcoral'])
ax.set_ylabel('Accuracy')
ax.set_title('Accuracy Comparison: RAG vs Fine-Tuned')
ax.set_ylim(0, 1)
# Add value labels on bars
for bar, acc in zip(bars, accuracies):
height = bar.get_height()
ax.text(bar.get_x() + bar.get_width()/2., height + 0.01,
f'{acc:.3f}', ha='center', va='bottom')
plt.tight_layout()
plt.savefig(output_path / 'accuracy_comparison.png', dpi=300, bbox_inches='tight')
plt.close()
# ---------------------------
# 2. Response Time Comparison
# ---------------------------
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(10, 6))
response_times = [metrics['rag']['avg_response_time'], metrics['fine_tuned']['avg_response_time']]
bars = ax.bar(methods, response_times, color=['lightgreen', 'orange'])
ax.set_ylabel('Average Response Time (seconds)')
ax.set_title('Response Time Comparison: RAG vs Fine-Tuned')
# Add value labels
for bar, time_val in zip(bars, response_times):
height = bar.get_height()
ax.text(bar.get_x() + bar.get_width()/2., height + 0.01,
f'{time_val:.3f}s', ha='center', va='bottom')
plt.tight_layout()
plt.savefig(output_path / 'response_time_comparison.png', dpi=300, bbox_inches='tight')
plt.close()
# ------------------------
# 3. Confidence Comparison
# ------------------------
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(10, 6))
confidences = [metrics['rag']['avg_confidence'], metrics['fine_tuned']['avg_confidence']]
bars = ax.bar(methods, confidences, color=['gold', 'lightsteelblue'])
ax.set_ylabel('Average Confidence')
ax.set_title('Confidence Comparison: RAG vs Fine-Tuned')
ax.set_ylim(0, 1)
# Add value labels
for bar, conf in zip(bars, confidences):
height = bar.get_height()
ax.text(bar.get_x() + bar.get_width()/2., height + 0.01,
f'{conf:.3f}', ha='center', va='bottom')
plt.tight_layout()
plt.savefig(output_path / 'confidence_comparison.png', dpi=300, bbox_inches='tight')
plt.close()
# --------------------------------
# 4. Comprehensive Metrics Heatmap
# --------------------------------
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(12, 8))
# Prepare data for heatmap
heatmap_data = {
'RAG': [
metrics['rag']['accuracy'],
metrics['rag']['avg_response_time'],
metrics['rag']['avg_confidence'],
metrics['rag']['factuality_rate']
],
'Fine-Tuned': [
metrics['fine_tuned']['accuracy'],
metrics['fine_tuned']['avg_response_time'],
metrics['fine_tuned']['avg_confidence'],
metrics['fine_tuned']['factuality_rate']
]
}
df_heatmap = pd.DataFrame(heatmap_data,
index=['Accuracy', 'Response Time', 'Confidence', 'Factuality Rate'])
sns.heatmap(df_heatmap, annot=True, fmt='.3f', cmap='RdYlBu_r', ax=ax)
ax.set_title('Comprehensive Metrics Comparison')
plt.tight_layout()
plt.savefig(output_path / 'metrics_heatmap.png', dpi=300, bbox_inches='tight')
plt.close()
logger.info(f"Visualizations saved to {output_dir}")
def run_comprehensive_evaluation(self, output_dir: str = "evaluation_results") -> Dict:
"""Run the complete evaluation pipeline"""
logger.info("Starting comprehensive evaluation...")
# -------------------------------------
# 1. Process documents and prepare data
# -------------------------------------
processor = FinancialDataProcessor()
processed_texts, qa_pairs = processor.process_all_documents()
chunks = processor.get_text_chunks()
# -----------------------
# 2. Prepare test dataset
# -----------------------
self.test_questions, self.ground_truth = self.prepare_test_dataset(qa_pairs)
logger.info(f"Prepared {len(self.test_questions)} test questions")
# ---------------------
# 3. Initialize systems
# ---------------------
logger.info("Initializing RAG system...")
rag_system = RAGSystem()
rag_system.add_documents(chunks)
logger.info("Initializing Fine-tuned system...")
fine_tuned_system = FineTunedSystem()
# ---------------------
# Fine-tune on the data
# ---------------------
config = TrainingConfig(
learning_rate=5e-5,
batch_size=2,
num_epochs=2,
max_length=512,
warmup_steps=50,
weight_decay=0.01,
gradient_accumulation_steps=2,
save_steps=100,
eval_steps=100,
logging_steps=50
)
fine_tuned_system.fine_tune_on_data(qa_pairs, config)
# ------------------
# 4. Run evaluations
# ------------------
logger.info("Running RAG evaluation...")
rag_results = self.evaluate_rag_system(rag_system, self.test_questions)
logger.info("Running Fine-tuned evaluation...")
fine_tuned_results = self.evaluate_fine_tuned_system(fine_tuned_system, self.test_questions)
# --------------------
# 5. Calculate metrics
# --------------------
self.evaluation_metrics = self.calculate_comprehensive_metrics(rag_results, fine_tuned_results)
# -------------------------
# 6. Generate results table
# -------------------------
results_table = self.generate_results_table(rag_results, fine_tuned_results)
# ---------------
# 7. Save results
# ---------------
output_path = Path(output_dir)
output_path.mkdir(exist_ok=True)
with open(output_path / "detailed_results.json", 'w') as f:
json.dump({
'rag_results': rag_results,
'fine_tuned_results': fine_tuned_results,
'metrics': self.evaluation_metrics
}, f, indent=2, default=str)
results_table.to_csv(output_path / "results_table.csv", index=False)
# Save metrics summary
with open(output_path / "metrics_summary.json", 'w') as f:
json.dump(self.evaluation_metrics, f, indent=2, default=str)
# 8. Create visualizations
self.create_visualizations(self.evaluation_metrics, output_dir)
# 9. Print summary
self._print_evaluation_summary()
logger.info(f"Comprehensive evaluation complete. Results saved to {output_dir}")
return self.evaluation_metrics
def _print_evaluation_summary(self):
"""Print a summary of evaluation results"""
print("\n" + "="*80)
print("COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION SUMMARY")
print("="*80)
print(f"\nRAG System Performance:")
print(f" Accuracy: {self.evaluation_metrics['rag']['accuracy']:.3f}")
print(f" Avg Response Time: {self.evaluation_metrics['rag']['avg_response_time']:.3f}s")
print(f" Avg Confidence: {self.evaluation_metrics['rag']['avg_confidence']:.3f}")
print(f" Factuality Rate: {self.evaluation_metrics['rag']['factuality_rate']:.3f}")
print(f"\nFine-Tuned System Performance:")
print(f" Accuracy: {self.evaluation_metrics['fine_tuned']['accuracy']:.3f}")
print(f" Avg Response Time: {self.evaluation_metrics['fine_tuned']['avg_response_time']:.3f}s")
print(f" Avg Confidence: {self.evaluation_metrics['fine_tuned']['avg_confidence']:.3f}")
print(f" Factuality Rate: {self.evaluation_metrics['fine_tuned']['factuality_rate']:.3f}")
print(f"\nImprovements with Fine-Tuning:")
print(f" Accuracy: {self.evaluation_metrics['improvements']['accuracy_improvement']:+.3f}")
print(f" Speed: {self.evaluation_metrics['improvements']['speed_improvement']:+.3f}s")
print(f" Confidence: {self.evaluation_metrics['improvements']['confidence_improvement']:+.3f}")
print(f" Factuality: {self.evaluation_metrics['improvements']['factuality_improvement']:+.3f}")
print("\n" + "="*80)
if __name__ == "__main__":
# Run comprehensive evaluation
evaluator = ComprehensiveEvaluator()
results = evaluator.run_comprehensive_evaluation()
print("\nEvaluation complete!")
|