File size: 1,628 Bytes
2ecccdf |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 |
# True Transfer Learning vs Pattern Matching
## The Problem with Previous Attempts
All previous prototypes fell into the **hardcoded pattern trap**:
```python
# This is NOT transfer learning:
if 'cricketer' in extract.lower():
return "Cricket player"
elif 'district' in extract.lower():
return "Administrative region"
```
## True Transfer Learning Approach
The new `true_transfer_learning.py` does **real transfer learning**:
### ✅ What It Does Right:
1. **NO hardcoded patterns** - no "if cricketer then..." rules
2. **Uses model's knowledge** - FLAN-T5 learned about Panesar during training
3. **Multiple prompting strategies** to find what works:
- "What is PANESAR known for?"
- "PANESAR is famous for being:"
- "Define PANESAR in simple terms:"
4. **Tries all strategies** and picks the best result
5. **Larger model** (FLAN-T5-base 850MB vs small 77MB)
### Key Insight:
The model **already knows** from pre-training:
- Panesar is a cricketer
- Tendulkar is a famous Indian batsman
- Beethoven is a composer
- Xanthic means yellowish
We just need to **ask the right way** to extract that knowledge.
## Expected Results
If successful, we should see:
- PANESAR → "English cricket bowler" (from model's training knowledge)
- TENDULKAR → "Indian cricket legend" (not hardcoded)
- XANTHIC → "Yellowish color" (model knows the definition)
## Why This Matters
This is the **difference between AI and rules**:
- **Rules**: IF cricket THEN "player"
- **AI**: Model actually understands what these words mean
If this works, we've achieved true transfer learning for crossword clue generation. |