thefinalboss commited on
Commit
074f836
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 4d5848d

Add AICL example: 12_zkp_system.aicl

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. data/aicl/examples/12_zkp_system.aicl +378 -0
data/aicl/examples/12_zkp_system.aicl ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,378 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ # AICL Example: Zero-Knowledge Proof System
2
+ # Comprehensive ZKP system supporting proof generation, verification, circuit compilation,
3
+ # trusted setup ceremonies, and multiple proof systems (Groth16, PLONK, STARK)
4
+
5
+ Goal Build a production-grade zero-knowledge proof system supporting multiple proof systems, efficient circuit compilation from high-level descriptions, secure trusted setup ceremonies, recursive proof composition, and privacy-preserving application development
6
+
7
+ Constraint Proof generation must complete within 60 seconds for circuits with up to 1 million constraints
8
+ Constraint Proof size must not exceed 512 bytes for Groth16 and 2KB for PLONK proofs
9
+ Constraint Verification must complete in under 10 milliseconds regardless of circuit complexity
10
+ Constraint Trusted setup must require minimum 3 independent participants with transcript verification
11
+ Constraint Circuit compilation must preserve semantic equivalence with source specification
12
+
13
+ Risk Trusted setup toxic waste leakage enables proof forgery and system compromise
14
+ Recovery Implement multi-party computation ceremony with thousands of participants, verify transcript completeness, publish all round contributions, and ensure at least one honest participant guarantees security
15
+ Risk Circuit implementation bug produces incorrect but verifying proofs
16
+ Recovery Enforce formal verification of circuit constraints, implement differential testing against reference implementation, and require audit of all arithmetic gates
17
+ Risk Proof generation denial of service through oversized circuit submission
18
+ Recovery Enforce maximum constraint limit per proof request, implement proof request queuing with resource quotas, and reject circuits exceeding computational budget
19
+ Risk Side-channel attack during proof generation reveals witness data
20
+ Recovery Implement constant-time arithmetic operations, randomize memory access patterns, and use oblivious RAM techniques for sensitive witness data
21
+ Risk Recursive proof composition vulnerability allows invalid proofs to verify
22
+ Recovery Validate each recursion level independently, enforce consistent verification key across composition, and implement cumulative soundness error tracking
23
+
24
+ Layer ZKPSystem
25
+ SubLayer: CircuitCompiler
26
+ # High-level language to R1CS/AIR compilation and optimization
27
+ SubLayer: ProofGenerator
28
+ # Multi-system proof generation with witness computation
29
+ SubLayer: ProofVerifier
30
+ # Fast verification for Groth16, PLONK, and STARK proofs
31
+ SubLayer: TrustedSetup
32
+ # MPC ceremony coordination and transcript verification
33
+ SubLayer: RecursiveComposer
34
+ # Proof composition and aggregation for recursive SNARKs
35
+
36
+ Validation Circuit constraint system must be satisfiable for valid witnesses and unsatisfiable for invalid ones
37
+ Validation Proof must verify against declared verification key and public inputs
38
+ Validation Trusted setup transcript must be verifiably complete with all participant contributions
39
+ Validation Recursive proof must verify at every level of composition
40
+ Validation Circuit output must match reference implementation for all test vectors
41
+ Validation Public input commitment must match Merkle root of declared public values
42
+ Validation Verification key must correspond to proving key from same trusted setup
43
+
44
+ Entity ZKPCircuit
45
+ circuit_id: string
46
+ name: string
47
+ constraint_count: integer
48
+ variable_count: integer
49
+ public_input_count: integer
50
+ circuit_type: string
51
+ source_hash: string
52
+ r1cs_bytes: bytes
53
+ proving_key_hash: string
54
+ verification_key_hash: string
55
+ max_degree: integer
56
+
57
+ Entity Proof
58
+ proof_id: string
59
+ circuit_id: string
60
+ proof_system: string
61
+ proof_bytes: bytes
62
+ public_inputs: list
63
+ proof_size: integer
64
+ generation_time_ms: integer
65
+ verification_time_ms: integer
66
+ is_recursive: boolean
67
+ recursion_depth: integer
68
+
69
+ Entity TrustedSetupCeremony
70
+ ceremony_id: string
71
+ circuit_id: string
72
+ proof_system: string
73
+ participant_count: integer
74
+ current_round: integer
75
+ total_rounds: integer
76
+ transcript_hash: string
77
+ ceremony_state: string
78
+ start_time: datetime
79
+ end_time: datetime
80
+ contributions: list
81
+
82
+ Entity SetupContribution
83
+ contribution_id: string
84
+ ceremony_id: string
85
+ participant_id: string
86
+ round_number: integer
87
+ contribution_hash: string
88
+ timestamp: datetime
89
+ is_verified: boolean
90
+ previous_contribution_hash: string
91
+ participant_public_key: bytes
92
+
93
+ Entity WitnessData
94
+ witness_id: string
95
+ circuit_id: string
96
+ private_inputs: dict
97
+ public_inputs: dict
98
+ intermediate_values: list
99
+ constraint_assignments: dict
100
+ is_valid: boolean
101
+ computation_time_ms: integer
102
+
103
+ Entity VerificationKey
104
+ key_id: string
105
+ circuit_id: string
106
+ proof_system: string
107
+ key_bytes: bytes
108
+ alpha_beta_g1: bytes
109
+ gamma_g2: bytes
110
+ delta_g2: bytes
111
+ ic_coefficients: list
112
+ key_hash: string
113
+ setup_ceremony: string
114
+
115
+ Entity RecursionLayer
116
+ layer_id: string
117
+ outer_circuit: ZKPCircuit
118
+ inner_proof: Proof
119
+ aggregation_count: integer
120
+ cumulative_soundness_error: float
121
+ verification_key_commitment: string
122
+ composition_type: string
123
+
124
+ Behavior CompileCircuit
125
+ Input:
126
+ source_code: string
127
+ language: string
128
+ proof_system: string
129
+ optimization_level: integer
130
+ Output:
131
+ circuit: ZKPCircuit
132
+ r1cs: bytes
133
+ warnings: list
134
+ Action:
135
+ Parse high-level circuit description into abstract syntax tree
136
+ Perform type checking and constraint completeness analysis
137
+ Flatten arithmetic expressions into R1CS or AIR representation
138
+ Optimize constraint count through gate merging and subexpression elimination
139
+ Compute variable and constraint counts for resource estimation
140
+ Generate proving and verification key placeholders
141
+ Validate circuit satisfiability with random test witness
142
+ Return compiled circuit with R1CS and optimization report
143
+
144
+ Behavior GenerateProof
145
+ Input:
146
+ circuit: ZKPCircuit
147
+ proving_key: bytes
148
+ witness: WitnessData
149
+ proof_system: string
150
+ Output:
151
+ proof: Proof
152
+ public_outputs: list
153
+ Action:
154
+ Validate witness satisfies all circuit constraints
155
+ Load proving key and circuit parameters
156
+ Execute multi-scalar multiplication for Groth16 or polynomial commitment for PLONK
157
+ Compute proof elements according to proof system protocol
158
+ Apply Fiat-Shamir heuristic for non-interactive transformation
159
+ Encode proof in compact byte representation
160
+ Verify generated proof before returning
161
+ Return proof with public inputs and timing metrics
162
+
163
+ Behavior VerifyProof
164
+ Input:
165
+ proof: Proof
166
+ verification_key: VerificationKey
167
+ public_inputs: list
168
+ proof_system: string
169
+ Output:
170
+ is_valid: boolean
171
+ verification_time_ms: integer
172
+ Action:
173
+ Deserialize proof bytes according to proof system format
174
+ Validate proof element encoding and curve membership
175
+ Compute pairing check for Groth16 verification equation
176
+ Or verify polynomial commitment and evaluation for PLONK
177
+ Or verify FRI protocol for STARK verification
178
+ Compare result to identity element for accept or reject
179
+ Return verification result with timing measurement
180
+
181
+ Behavior ConductTrustedSetup
182
+ Input:
183
+ ceremony_config: TrustedSetupCeremony
184
+ circuit: ZKPCircuit
185
+ participants: list
186
+ Output:
187
+ ceremony: TrustedSetupCeremony
188
+ proving_key: bytes
189
+ verification_key: VerificationKey
190
+ Action:
191
+ Initialize ceremony with circuit parameters and randomness beacon
192
+ For each round, collect participant contributions
193
+ Verify each contribution is well-formed and extends previous state
194
+ Update ceremony transcript with verified contribution
195
+ After all rounds, extract proving and verification keys
196
+ Compute and publish final transcript hash
197
+ Securely delete intermediate toxic waste
198
+ Return ceremony record with derived keys
199
+
200
+ Behavior ComposeRecursiveProof
201
+ Input:
202
+ inner_proofs: list
203
+ outer_circuit: ZKPCircuit
204
+ composition_type: string
205
+ Output:
206
+ recursive_proof: Proof
207
+ soundness_error: float
208
+ Action:
209
+ Verify all inner proofs independently before composition
210
+ Encode inner proof verification as constraints in outer circuit
211
+ Aggregate multiple proofs using accumulation scheme
212
+ Track cumulative soundness error across recursion depth
213
+ Generate outer proof attesting to inner proof validity
214
+ Verify recursive proof with single verification
215
+ Return recursive proof with soundness analysis
216
+
217
+ Behavior ComputeWitness
218
+ Input:
219
+ circuit: ZKPCircuit
220
+ private_inputs: dict
221
+ public_inputs: dict
222
+ Output:
223
+ witness: WitnessData
224
+ is_valid: boolean
225
+ Action:
226
+ Initialize witness assignment from provided inputs
227
+ Execute circuit computation forward through constraint system
228
+ Record all intermediate wire values
229
+ Verify all constraints are satisfied with computed values
230
+ Identify any constraint violations
231
+ Return witness with validity flag and computation metrics
232
+
233
+ Behavior OptimizeCircuit
234
+ Input:
235
+ circuit: ZKPCircuit
236
+ target: string
237
+ constraints: dict
238
+ Output:
239
+ optimized_circuit: ZKPCircuit
240
+ optimization_report: dict
241
+ Action:
242
+ Identify redundant constraints and subexpression duplicates
243
+ Apply gate merging for compatible arithmetic operations
244
+ Rearrange constraint ordering for cache efficiency
245
+ Implement lookup tables for range checks and other patterns
246
+ Estimate constraint reduction and proof generation improvement
247
+ Validate optimized circuit against original test vectors
248
+ Return optimized circuit with detailed report
249
+
250
+ Condition:
251
+ When proof_generation_time exceeds 120 seconds for any single proof
252
+ Then emit performance_alert and suggest circuit optimization or proof system migration
253
+
254
+ Condition:
255
+ When trusted_setup participant count drops below minimum threshold during active ceremony
256
+ Then pause ceremony and require additional participants before resuming
257
+
258
+ Condition:
259
+ When recursive_proof soundness error exceeds 2^-80 security parameter
260
+ Then reject recursive composition and require additional verification of inner proofs
261
+
262
+ Condition:
263
+ When witness constraint violation detected during computation
264
+ Then halt proof generation, report violated constraint details, and mark witness as invalid
265
+
266
+ Condition:
267
+ When proof verification fails for previously verified proof
268
+ Then emit critical_integrity_alert, verify verification key integrity, and audit proof system implementation
269
+
270
+ Event:
271
+ On circuit_compiled
272
+ Action: Cache compiled circuit, emit constraint statistics, update circuit registry, notify dependent applications
273
+
274
+ Event:
275
+ On proof_generated
276
+ Action: Store proof in proof database, emit generation metrics, update usage statistics, cache for batch verification
277
+
278
+ Event:
279
+ On proof_verified
280
+ Action: Log verification result, update verification analytics, emit verification receipt, track verification throughput
281
+
282
+ Event:
283
+ On setup_contribution_received
284
+ Action: Verify contribution integrity, update ceremony transcript, advance ceremony round, notify next participant
285
+
286
+ Event:
287
+ On circuit_optimization_completed
288
+ Action: Update circuit registry, validate against test vectors, emit optimization report, suggest re-setup if constraint count changed significantly
289
+
290
+ Parallel:
291
+ Circuit compilation with multi-pass optimization stages
292
+ Proof generation with multi-scalar multiplication acceleration
293
+ Batch proof verification with pairing batch optimization
294
+ Trusted setup ceremony with parallel participant processing
295
+
296
+ Optimize: Proof generation speed for large circuits
297
+ Priority: Reduce proof generation time by 50 percent through GPU-accelerated multi-scalar multiplication and optimized FFT implementations
298
+
299
+ Optimize: Circuit constraint count reduction
300
+ Priority: Minimize constraint count through custom gates, lookup tables, and subexpression sharing to reduce proof generation cost
301
+
302
+ Optimize: Batch verification throughput
303
+ Priority: Maximize batch verification throughput using aggregated pairing checks and proof-specific batching strategies
304
+
305
+ Learn: Optimal proof system selection per circuit type
306
+ Goal: Automatically recommend best proof system based on circuit characteristics and deployment requirements
307
+ Adapt: Proof system recommendation weights and selection criteria
308
+ Based: Historical proof generation and verification metrics across proof systems, circuit size correlation, and deployment context analysis
309
+
310
+ Learn: Circuit optimization opportunity prediction
311
+ Goal: Predict which optimization passes will yield greatest constraint reduction before running them
312
+ Adapt: Optimization pass scheduling and priority ordering
313
+ Based: Circuit structural analysis, previous optimization results, and constraint pattern classification
314
+
315
+ Learn: Proof generation resource estimation
316
+ Goal: Accurately predict proof generation time and memory requirements before execution
317
+ Adapt: Resource estimation model parameters and scaling coefficients
318
+ Based: Historical generation metrics, constraint count correlation, witness size analysis, and hardware benchmark data
319
+
320
+ Security:
321
+ Encrypt: Witness data during proof generation using AES-256-GCM with memory-locked key storage
322
+ Encrypt: Trusted setup contributions in transit using TLS 1.3 with participant certificate authentication
323
+ Protect: Proof generation against side-channel attacks using constant-time field arithmetic and randomized computation order
324
+ Protect: Trusted setup against malicious participants using contribution verification and transcript binding
325
+ Protect: Verification keys against substitution using key commitment in proof verification protocol
326
+ Protect: Recursive composition against soundness degradation through cumulative error tracking and threshold enforcement
327
+
328
+ Native: rust
329
+ {
330
+ use ark_ff::{Field, PrimeField};
331
+ use ark_groth16::{Groth16, Proof, VerifyingKey};
332
+ use ark_r1cs_std::prelude::*;
333
+ use ark_relations::r1cs::{ConstraintSynthesizer, ConstraintSystemRef};
334
+ use ark_bn254::Bn254;
335
+ use ark_snark::SNARK;
336
+
337
+ struct MerkleMembershipCircuit<F: PrimeField> {
338
+ leaf: Option<F>,
339
+ path_elements: Vec<Option<F>>,
340
+ path_indices: Vec<Option<bool>>,
341
+ root: Option<F>,
342
+ }
343
+
344
+ impl<F: PrimeField> ConstraintSynthesizer<F> for MerkleMembershipCircuit<F> {
345
+ fn generate_constraints(self, cs: ConstraintSystemRef<F>) -> ark_relations::r1cs::Result<()> {
346
+ let leaf = FpVar::new_input(cs.clone(), || self.leaf.ok_or(ark_relations::r1cs::SynthesisError::AssignmentMissing))?;
347
+ let root = FpVar::new_input(cs.clone(), || self.root.ok_or(ark_relations::r1cs::SynthesisError::AssignmentMissing))?;
348
+
349
+ let mut current = leaf;
350
+ for (i, (element, index)) in self.path_elements.iter().zip(self.path_indices.iter()).enumerate() {
351
+ let sibling = FpVar::new_witness(cs.clone(), || element.ok_or(ark_relations::r1cs::SynthesisError::AssignmentMissing))?;
352
+ let is_right = Boolean::new_witness(cs.clone(), || index.ok_or(ark_relations::r1cs::SynthesisError::AssignmentMissing))?;
353
+
354
+ let hash_input = conditionally_select(&is_right, &sibling, &current, &current, &sibling);
355
+ current = poseidon_hash(&hash_input);
356
+ }
357
+
358
+ current.enforce_equal(&root)?;
359
+ Ok(())
360
+ }
361
+ }
362
+
363
+ fn generate_groth16_proof(
364
+ circuit: MerkleMembershipCircuit<ark_bn254::Fr>,
365
+ pk: &ark_groth16::ProvingKey<Bn254>,
366
+ ) -> Proof<Bn254> {
367
+ let mut rng = ark_std::test_rng();
368
+ Groth16::prove(pk, circuit, &mut rng).unwrap()
369
+ }
370
+
371
+ fn verify_groth16_proof(
372
+ vk: &VerifyingKey<Bn254>,
373
+ proof: &Proof<Bn254>,
374
+ public_inputs: &[ark_bn254::Fr],
375
+ ) -> bool {
376
+ Groth16::verify(vk, public_inputs, proof).unwrap()
377
+ }
378
+ }