Image Classification
PyTorch
timm
computer-vision
vehicle-classification
fine-grained-classification
Instructions to use twincar-group2/twincar-classifier with libraries, inference providers, notebooks, and local apps. Follow these links to get started.
- Libraries
- timm
How to use twincar-group2/twincar-classifier with timm:
import timm model = timm.create_model("hf_hub:twincar-group2/twincar-classifier", pretrained=True) - Notebooks
- Google Colab
- Kaggle
Update model card for augmentation v2 final checkpoint
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,9 +1,11 @@
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
| 2 |
library_name: pytorch
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
tags:
|
| 4 |
- image-classification
|
| 5 |
- computer-vision
|
| 6 |
- vehicle-classification
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
- pytorch
|
| 8 |
- timm
|
| 9 |
license: mit
|
|
@@ -11,32 +13,181 @@ license: mit
|
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
# TwinCar Classifier
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-
TwinCar is a vehicle make and
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-
-
|
| 21 |
-
-
|
| 22 |
-
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-
|
| 31 |
-
- training dataset summary
|
| 32 |
-
- validation metrics
|
| 33 |
-
- robustness evaluation notes
|
| 34 |
-
- usage instructions
|
| 35 |
-
- limitations
|
| 36 |
-
- links to GitHub, W&B, and demo Space
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
-
-
|
| 41 |
-
|
| 42 |
-
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
| 2 |
library_name: pytorch
|
| 3 |
+
pipeline_tag: image-classification
|
| 4 |
tags:
|
| 5 |
- image-classification
|
| 6 |
- computer-vision
|
| 7 |
- vehicle-classification
|
| 8 |
+
- fine-grained-classification
|
| 9 |
- pytorch
|
| 10 |
- timm
|
| 11 |
license: mit
|
|
|
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
# TwinCar Classifier
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
+
TwinCar is a vehicle make, model, and auxiliary year recognition project developed for the Brainster Data Science Academy Machine Learning Final Project.
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
+
The final deployed model is an EfficientNet-B3 classifier fine-tuned on Stanford Cars. It predicts one of 196 fine-grained Stanford Cars classes, then derives vehicle make, model, and year from the predicted class metadata.
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
+
## Final deployed checkpoint
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
+
- **Checkpoint file:** `efficientnet_b3_stanford300_augv2_best.pt`
|
| 23 |
+
- **Architecture:** EfficientNet-B3
|
| 24 |
+
- **Input size:** 300 px
|
| 25 |
+
- **Classes:** 196 Stanford Cars fine-grained classes
|
| 26 |
+
- **Training data:** Stanford Cars training split
|
| 27 |
+
- **Training augmentation:** augmentation v2
|
| 28 |
+
- **Framework:** PyTorch + timm
|
| 29 |
+
- **Checkpoint manifest:** `checkpoint_manifest.json`
|
| 30 |
+
- **Current status:** final deployed candidate
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
+
The model repo also keeps older checkpoints for comparison and rollback:
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
+
- `efficientnet_b3_stanford300_best.pt` β previous EfficientNet-B3 checkpoint
|
| 35 |
+
- `best.pt` β older ResNet18 baseline checkpoint
|
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
+
## What the model predicts
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
+
The model directly predicts a fine-grained class, for example:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
+
```text
|
| 42 |
+
Dodge Charger SRT-8 2009
|
| 43 |
+
```
|
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
+
From that fine-grained prediction, the system derives:
|
| 46 |
+
|
| 47 |
+
- **make** β e.g. `Dodge`
|
| 48 |
+
- **model** β e.g. `Charger SRT-8`
|
| 49 |
+
- **year** β e.g. `2009`
|
| 50 |
+
|
| 51 |
+
Year is included as an auxiliary output, but it is not predicted by a separate year-regression or year-classification head. It is derived from the predicted fine-grained class metadata.
|
| 52 |
+
|
| 53 |
+
## Validation results
|
| 54 |
+
|
| 55 |
+
Final quantitative comparison is reported on the locked Stanford validation split using the same evaluation protocol for all compared models.
|
| 56 |
+
|
| 57 |
+
| Transform | Fine acc | Make acc | Model acc | Year acc | Top-3 acc | Top-5 acc |
|
| 58 |
+
| ---------------- | -------: | -------: | --------: | -------: | --------: | --------: |
|
| 59 |
+
| clean | 0.7864 | 0.8692 | 0.7925 | 0.8913 | 0.9196 | 0.9521 |
|
| 60 |
+
| robust_light | 0.7882 | 0.8680 | 0.7944 | 0.8956 | 0.9159 | 0.9490 |
|
| 61 |
+
| robust_hard | 0.6839 | 0.7778 | 0.6900 | 0.8355 | 0.8600 | 0.9055 |
|
| 62 |
+
| robust_occlusion | 0.6317 | 0.7317 | 0.6366 | 0.8048 | 0.8060 | 0.8600 |
|
| 63 |
+
|
| 64 |
+
The augmentation-v2 EfficientNet-B3 model improved both clean validation accuracy and robustness compared with the earlier EfficientNet-B3 candidate.
|
| 65 |
+
|
| 66 |
+
## Robustness evaluation
|
| 67 |
+
|
| 68 |
+
The final model was evaluated under multiple image transforms:
|
| 69 |
+
|
| 70 |
+
- **clean** β standard validation preprocessing
|
| 71 |
+
- **robust_light** β mild production-like perturbations
|
| 72 |
+
- **robust_hard** β stronger blur, lighting, color, and geometric perturbations
|
| 73 |
+
- **robust_occlusion** β synthetic occlusion/erasing stress test
|
| 74 |
+
|
| 75 |
+
These tests are not a replacement for real-world field validation, but they quantify how the model behaves under controlled distribution shifts.
|
| 76 |
+
|
| 77 |
+
## CompCars status
|
| 78 |
+
|
| 79 |
+
CompCars was inspected and used for external validation and reconnaissance, but it was not blindly merged into final training.
|
| 80 |
+
|
| 81 |
+
The main reason is that Stanford Cars and CompCars have a significant domain and label-distribution gap:
|
| 82 |
+
|
| 83 |
+
- Stanford Cars is a clean fine-grained benchmark with 196 make/model/year classes.
|
| 84 |
+
- CompCars contains different image domains and different make/model taxonomies.
|
| 85 |
+
- Exact Stanford Cars β CompCars make/model/year overlap was too small and biased for safe blind merging.
|
| 86 |
+
- Make-level external validation on CompCars showed a strong cross-domain performance drop.
|
| 87 |
+
|
| 88 |
+
This confirmed that CompCars integration is a domain adaptation problem, not a simple data-merge task.
|
| 89 |
+
|
| 90 |
+
Future work should build a verified Stanford Cars β CompCars alias map, train on a controlled filtered subset, and validate on a true cross-domain holdout.
|
| 91 |
+
|
| 92 |
+
## Held-out Stanford test status
|
| 93 |
+
|
| 94 |
+
The local Stanford Cars test images were available and were used for qualitative API/demo smoke testing.
|
| 95 |
+
|
| 96 |
+
However, the available `cars_test_annos.mat` file contained only bounding boxes and filenames:
|
| 97 |
+
|
| 98 |
+
```text
|
| 99 |
+
bbox_x1
|
| 100 |
+
bbox_y1
|
| 101 |
+
bbox_x2
|
| 102 |
+
bbox_y2
|
| 103 |
+
fname
|
| 104 |
+
```
|
| 105 |
+
|
| 106 |
+
It did not include class labels.
|
| 107 |
+
|
| 108 |
+
The provided Kaggle mirror, `eduardo4jesus/stanford-cars-dataset`, was also checked. It included:
|
| 109 |
+
|
| 110 |
+
```text
|
| 111 |
+
cars_meta.mat
|
| 112 |
+
cars_train_annos.mat
|
| 113 |
+
cars_test_annos.mat
|
| 114 |
+
```
|
| 115 |
+
|
| 116 |
+
but did not provide:
|
| 117 |
+
|
| 118 |
+
```text
|
| 119 |
+
cars_test_annos_withlabels.mat
|
| 120 |
+
cars_annos.mat
|
| 121 |
+
```
|
| 122 |
+
|
| 123 |
+
Final quantitative model comparison is therefore reported on the locked Stanford validation split using an identical protocol and seed for every compared model. This keeps model-to-model deltas valid. A labeled held-out Stanford test evaluation would be a straightforward extension if `cars_test_annos_withlabels.mat` is obtained.
|
| 124 |
+
|
| 125 |
+
## Demo
|
| 126 |
+
|
| 127 |
+
The model is deployed in a Hugging Face Space:
|
| 128 |
+
|
| 129 |
+
- **Demo Space:** [https://huggingface.co/spaces/twincar-group2/twincar-demo](https://huggingface.co/spaces/twincar-group2/twincar-demo)
|
| 130 |
+
|
| 131 |
+
The Space supports:
|
| 132 |
+
|
| 133 |
+
- image upload
|
| 134 |
+
- webcam/clipboard input
|
| 135 |
+
- full-image prediction
|
| 136 |
+
- make/model/year display
|
| 137 |
+
- top-k predictions
|
| 138 |
+
- optional YOLO crop comparison mode
|
| 139 |
+
|
| 140 |
+
The YOLO cropper is experimental and default-off. The official prediction remains the full-image EfficientNet-B3 prediction.
|
| 141 |
+
|
| 142 |
+
## API and code
|
| 143 |
+
|
| 144 |
+
Project repository:
|
| 145 |
+
|
| 146 |
+
- **GitHub:** [https://github.com/Hristijan-kiko/twincar](https://github.com/Hristijan-kiko/twincar)
|
| 147 |
+
|
| 148 |
+
The GitHub repo includes:
|
| 149 |
+
|
| 150 |
+
- reusable Python package
|
| 151 |
+
- FastAPI inference endpoint
|
| 152 |
+
- Gradio demo app
|
| 153 |
+
- batch prediction script
|
| 154 |
+
- training and evaluation scripts
|
| 155 |
+
- robust evaluation reports
|
| 156 |
+
- CI with linting and tests
|
| 157 |
+
|
| 158 |
+
## W&B
|
| 159 |
+
|
| 160 |
+
Training and experiment tracking:
|
| 161 |
+
|
| 162 |
+
- **W&B project:** [https://wandb.ai/hzlatevskii-brainster-data-science-academy/twincar](https://wandb.ai/hzlatevskii-brainster-data-science-academy/twincar)
|
| 163 |
+
|
| 164 |
+
## Intended use
|
| 165 |
+
|
| 166 |
+
This model is intended for educational and prototype-level vehicle recognition experiments, especially make/model classification from car images similar to Stanford Cars.
|
| 167 |
+
|
| 168 |
+
Appropriate uses:
|
| 169 |
+
|
| 170 |
+
- fine-grained vehicle make/model recognition demo
|
| 171 |
+
- model comparison and robustness analysis
|
| 172 |
+
- prototype vehicle inspection workflow
|
| 173 |
+
- academic/academy project demonstration
|
| 174 |
+
|
| 175 |
+
## Limitations
|
| 176 |
+
|
| 177 |
+
- The final model is trained on Stanford Cars, not on real drone/robot production footage.
|
| 178 |
+
- CompCars showed a strong domain gap and was not blindly merged into final training.
|
| 179 |
+
- True top-down drone views remain out-of-distribution.
|
| 180 |
+
- Robustness tests use controlled synthetic perturbations, not full real-world field validation.
|
| 181 |
+
- Year is derived from the fine-grained class label metadata, not learned as an independent year model.
|
| 182 |
+
- The system assumes the uploaded image contains a vehicle.
|
| 183 |
+
- Strong non-car/out-of-distribution rejection is not implemented yet.
|
| 184 |
+
- Similar models and years can be confused because fine-grained vehicle classification often depends on subtle visual details.
|
| 185 |
+
|
| 186 |
+
## Future work
|
| 187 |
+
|
| 188 |
+
- Build a verified Stanford Cars β CompCars alias map.
|
| 189 |
+
- Fine-tune on a controlled CompCars surveillance subset.
|
| 190 |
+
- Add real production/drone/robot images for target-domain validation.
|
| 191 |
+
- Add non-car/out-of-distribution rejection.
|
| 192 |
+
- Add detector-assisted preprocessing as a validated default only if it improves real metrics.
|
| 193 |
+
- Explore multi-head prediction for make/model/year if independent outputs become necessary.
|