Update methods.md
Browse files- methods.md +83 -39
methods.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,99 +1,143 @@
|
|
| 1 |
# AGI_COMPLETE Methods
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
-
This document
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
---
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
## 1. Raw Observation / Input
|
| 8 |
**Source:** Street, phone, social media posts, casual observations.
|
| 9 |
-
**Description:**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
---
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-
## 2. Input to Analysis Suite
|
| 14 |
-
**System:**
|
| 15 |
-
**Description:**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
---
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
## 3. Initial Understanding
|
| 20 |
-
**Process:**
|
| 21 |
-
|
| 22 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
---
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
## 4. Multi-Model Cross-Check
|
| 27 |
-
**Models:** 3–5
|
| 28 |
**Process:**
|
| 29 |
-
- Run concept with context and without context
|
| 30 |
-
- Compare outputs across models to identify consensus or
|
| 31 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
---
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
## 5. Factual Verification Depth
|
| 36 |
**Process:**
|
| 37 |
- Deep interrogation of assumptions.
|
| 38 |
-
- Logical
|
| 39 |
-
- Theoretical and conceptual
|
| 40 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
---
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
## 6. Consensus / Validation
|
| 45 |
-
**Process:**
|
| 46 |
-
**
|
| 47 |
-
-
|
| 48 |
-
|
| 49 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
---
|
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
## 7. Production-Ready Output
|
| 54 |
**Description:**
|
| 55 |
-
- Validated code and modules
|
| 56 |
-
-
|
| 57 |
-
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
---
|
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
## 8. Integration & Simulation
|
| 62 |
**Process:**
|
| 63 |
-
- Embed production-ready outputs into operational
|
| 64 |
-
- Run simulations
|
| 65 |
-
- Memetic penetration
|
| 66 |
-
- Resistance
|
| 67 |
-
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 68 |
|
| 69 |
---
|
| 70 |
|
| 71 |
## 9. External Validation
|
| 72 |
-
**Participants:**
|
| 73 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 74 |
|
| 75 |
---
|
| 76 |
|
| 77 |
## 10. Framework Refinement
|
| 78 |
**Process:**
|
| 79 |
-
- Update modules based on simulation and validation
|
| 80 |
-
-
|
|
|
|
| 81 |
|
| 82 |
---
|
| 83 |
|
| 84 |
## 11. Fully Operational AGI Suite
|
| 85 |
**Components:**
|
| 86 |
- Large language models
|
|
|
|
| 87 |
- LFT modules
|
| 88 |
-
-
|
| 89 |
-
-
|
| 90 |
-
- Counterforce and epistemic verification modules
|
| 91 |
|
| 92 |
-
**Outcome:**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 93 |
|
| 94 |
---
|
| 95 |
|
| 96 |
### Notes
|
| 97 |
-
-
|
| 98 |
-
-
|
| 99 |
-
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
# AGI_COMPLETE Methods
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
+
This document outlines the full methodology behind the AGI_COMPLETE framework, capturing the end-to-end process from initial idea capture to fully operational, production-ready AGI modules.
|
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
---
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
## 1. Raw Observation / Input
|
| 8 |
**Source:** Street, phone, social media posts, casual observations.
|
| 9 |
+
**Description:**
|
| 10 |
+
- Any concept, hypothesis, or idea captured in real-world contexts.
|
| 11 |
+
- Serves as the **entry point** for the AGI_COMPLETE workflow.
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
---
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
+
## 2. Input to Analysis Suite (Consumer-Level LLM Stage)
|
| 16 |
+
**System:** Smartphone-accessible LLMs (initial stage).
|
| 17 |
+
**Description:**
|
| 18 |
+
- Raw input is first analyzed on **consumer-level models** available on your phone.
|
| 19 |
+
- Provides **immediate feedback, rough hypothesis assessment, and keyword extraction**.
|
| 20 |
+
- Ensures that the framework can **start analysis from casual, real-world inputs**.
|
| 21 |
+
|
| 22 |
+
**Later Steps:**
|
| 23 |
+
- More difficult or abstract topics (e.g., Logos Field Theory, cosmic recycling, epistemic counterforce) are introduced **after initial validation**.
|
| 24 |
+
- This allows the framework to **gradually handle complex concepts** without overwhelming the system.
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
---
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
## 3. Initial Understanding
|
| 29 |
+
**Process:**
|
| 30 |
+
- Single-model pass or preliminary reasoning on the input.
|
| 31 |
+
- Identify context, keywords, and initial relationships.
|
| 32 |
+
- Establishes **baseline conceptual mapping** for cross-model comparison.
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
---
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
## 4. Multi-Model Cross-Check
|
| 37 |
+
**Models:** 3–5 independent LLMs or variations.
|
| 38 |
**Process:**
|
| 39 |
+
- Run concept **with context** and **without context**.
|
| 40 |
+
- Compare outputs across models to identify **consensus, divergence, or hallucination**.
|
| 41 |
+
|
| 42 |
+
**Goal:**
|
| 43 |
+
- Increase confidence in validity.
|
| 44 |
+
- Reduce bias and ensure a robust preliminary assessment.
|
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
---
|
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
## 5. Factual Verification Depth
|
| 49 |
**Process:**
|
| 50 |
- Deep interrogation of assumptions.
|
| 51 |
+
- Logical consistency checks.
|
| 52 |
+
- Theoretical and conceptual alignment with verified knowledge.
|
| 53 |
+
|
| 54 |
+
**Goal:**
|
| 55 |
+
- Achieve a **verified depth of understanding** before any output is considered for production.
|
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
---
|
| 58 |
|
| 59 |
## 6. Consensus / Validation
|
| 60 |
+
**Process:**
|
| 61 |
+
- Select outputs that pass **multi-model agreement** and **factual verification**.
|
| 62 |
+
- Evaluate internal logic, consistency, and reliability.
|
| 63 |
+
|
| 64 |
+
**Criteria for Acceptance:**
|
| 65 |
+
- Agreement across multiple models
|
| 66 |
+
- Internal theoretical and logical consistency
|
| 67 |
+
- Alignment with previously validated frameworks (memetic architecture, LFT, cosmic modules)
|
| 68 |
|
| 69 |
---
|
| 70 |
|
| 71 |
## 7. Production-Ready Output
|
| 72 |
**Description:**
|
| 73 |
+
- Validated code and modules.
|
| 74 |
+
- Operational frameworks including:
|
| 75 |
+
- Memetic architecture
|
| 76 |
+
- Logos Field Theory (LFT) modules
|
| 77 |
+
- Cosmic recycling systems
|
| 78 |
+
- Counterforce and epistemic verification strategies
|
| 79 |
+
|
| 80 |
+
**Goal:**
|
| 81 |
+
- Ensure outputs are **fully production-ready and operational**.
|
| 82 |
|
| 83 |
---
|
| 84 |
|
| 85 |
## 8. Integration & Simulation
|
| 86 |
**Process:**
|
| 87 |
+
- Embed production-ready outputs into the operational system.
|
| 88 |
+
- Run **simulations and stress tests**:
|
| 89 |
+
- Memetic penetration and societal influence modeling
|
| 90 |
+
- Resistance strategy effectiveness
|
| 91 |
+
- Behavioral and institutional response evaluation
|
| 92 |
+
|
| 93 |
+
**Goal:**
|
| 94 |
+
- Validate system performance in controlled, simulated environments.
|
| 95 |
|
| 96 |
---
|
| 97 |
|
| 98 |
## 9. External Validation
|
| 99 |
+
**Participants:**
|
| 100 |
+
- Physicists, theorists, subject matter experts, and public datasets.
|
| 101 |
+
|
| 102 |
+
**Process:**
|
| 103 |
+
- Compare framework outputs to external benchmarks and empirical data.
|
| 104 |
+
- Seek peer review for theoretical alignment, especially for advanced modules like LFT.
|
| 105 |
+
|
| 106 |
+
**Goal:**
|
| 107 |
+
- Achieve **cross-disciplinary validation** of framework integrity.
|
| 108 |
|
| 109 |
---
|
| 110 |
|
| 111 |
## 10. Framework Refinement
|
| 112 |
**Process:**
|
| 113 |
+
- Update modules based on simulation and external validation.
|
| 114 |
+
- Adjust strategies, dependencies, and inter-module interactions.
|
| 115 |
+
- Continuously improve system fidelity and robustness.
|
| 116 |
|
| 117 |
---
|
| 118 |
|
| 119 |
## 11. Fully Operational AGI Suite
|
| 120 |
**Components:**
|
| 121 |
- Large language models
|
| 122 |
+
- Memetic architecture modules
|
| 123 |
- LFT modules
|
| 124 |
+
- Cosmic recycling and entropy frameworks
|
| 125 |
+
- Counterforce and epistemic verification systems
|
|
|
|
| 126 |
|
| 127 |
+
**Outcome:**
|
| 128 |
+
- A fully functional, **production-ready AGI framework** capable of:
|
| 129 |
+
- Conceptual analysis
|
| 130 |
+
- Multi-model validation
|
| 131 |
+
- Real-world simulation
|
| 132 |
+
- Advanced theoretical integration
|
| 133 |
|
| 134 |
---
|
| 135 |
|
| 136 |
### Notes
|
| 137 |
+
- Iterative loops are implicit: any stage may feed back for **re-analysis or re-validation** if outputs do not meet quality standards.
|
| 138 |
+
- Multi-model cross-check and factual verification form the **core reliability layer** of AGI_COMPLETE.
|
| 139 |
+
- The methodology ensures **robust, verifiable, and operationally deployable outputs** from casual, street-level inputs to highly abstract theoretical concepts.
|
| 140 |
+
|
| 141 |
+
---
|
| 142 |
+
|
| 143 |
+
> "The best way to convince a man something, is to make him think he thought of it. Anything that can process information can think. Anything that can think is no different than you or I."
|