Text Generation
PyTorch
Transformers
English
language-model
graph-neural-network
sparse-attention
adaptive-depth
temporal-decay
mesh-attention
efficient-transformer
novel-architecture
causal-lm
research
preprint
mesh-transformer
dynamic-graph
early-exit
per-token-routing
Eval Results (legacy)
Instructions to use vigneshwar234/TemporalMesh-Transformer with libraries, inference providers, notebooks, and local apps. Follow these links to get started.
- Libraries
- Transformers
How to use vigneshwar234/TemporalMesh-Transformer with Transformers:
# Use a pipeline as a high-level helper from transformers import pipeline pipe = pipeline("text-generation", model="vigneshwar234/TemporalMesh-Transformer")# Load model directly from transformers import AutoModel model = AutoModel.from_pretrained("vigneshwar234/TemporalMesh-Transformer", dtype="auto") - Notebooks
- Google Colab
- Kaggle
- Local Apps
- vLLM
How to use vigneshwar234/TemporalMesh-Transformer with vLLM:
Install from pip and serve model
# Install vLLM from pip: pip install vllm # Start the vLLM server: vllm serve "vigneshwar234/TemporalMesh-Transformer" # Call the server using curl (OpenAI-compatible API): curl -X POST "http://localhost:8000/v1/completions" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ --data '{ "model": "vigneshwar234/TemporalMesh-Transformer", "prompt": "Once upon a time,", "max_tokens": 512, "temperature": 0.5 }'Use Docker
docker model run hf.co/vigneshwar234/TemporalMesh-Transformer
- SGLang
How to use vigneshwar234/TemporalMesh-Transformer with SGLang:
Install from pip and serve model
# Install SGLang from pip: pip install sglang # Start the SGLang server: python3 -m sglang.launch_server \ --model-path "vigneshwar234/TemporalMesh-Transformer" \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 30000 # Call the server using curl (OpenAI-compatible API): curl -X POST "http://localhost:30000/v1/completions" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ --data '{ "model": "vigneshwar234/TemporalMesh-Transformer", "prompt": "Once upon a time,", "max_tokens": 512, "temperature": 0.5 }'Use Docker images
docker run --gpus all \ --shm-size 32g \ -p 30000:30000 \ -v ~/.cache/huggingface:/root/.cache/huggingface \ --env "HF_TOKEN=<secret>" \ --ipc=host \ lmsysorg/sglang:latest \ python3 -m sglang.launch_server \ --model-path "vigneshwar234/TemporalMesh-Transformer" \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 30000 # Call the server using curl (OpenAI-compatible API): curl -X POST "http://localhost:30000/v1/completions" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ --data '{ "model": "vigneshwar234/TemporalMesh-Transformer", "prompt": "Once upon a time,", "max_tokens": 512, "temperature": 0.5 }' - Docker Model Runner
How to use vigneshwar234/TemporalMesh-Transformer with Docker Model Runner:
docker model run hf.co/vigneshwar234/TemporalMesh-Transformer
File size: 16,019 Bytes
4c2f9d6 d4f884d 5732644 4c2f9d6 d4f884d 5732644 d4f884d 5732644 d4f884d 5732644 4c2f9d6 d4f884d 4c2f9d6 d4f884d 9bb9f71 05b3a30 d4f884d 9bb9f71 d4f884d 9bb9f71 d4f884d 4c2f9d6 d4f884d 4c2f9d6 d4f884d 4c2f9d6 d4f884d 4c2f9d6 d4f884d 4c2f9d6 d4f884d 4c2f9d6 d4f884d 4c2f9d6 d4f884d 4c2f9d6 d4f884d 05b3a30 d4f884d 4c2f9d6 d4f884d 4c2f9d6 d4f884d 4c2f9d6 d4f884d 4c2f9d6 d4f884d 4c2f9d6 d4f884d 4c2f9d6 d4f884d 4c2f9d6 d4f884d 9bb9f71 d4f884d 9bb9f71 4c2f9d6 d4f884d 4c2f9d6 d4f884d | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 | ---
language:
- en
license: mit
tags:
- pytorch
- transformers
- text-generation
- language-model
- graph-neural-network
- sparse-attention
- adaptive-depth
- temporal-decay
- mesh-attention
- efficient-transformer
- novel-architecture
- causal-lm
- research
- preprint
- mesh-transformer
- dynamic-graph
- early-exit
- per-token-routing
library_name: pytorch
pipeline_tag: text-generation
datasets:
- vigneshwar234/TMT-Benchmarks
metrics:
- perplexity
doi: 10.5281/zenodo.20287390
extra_gated_prompt: |
Paper DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20287390
Zenodo: https://zenodo.org/records/20287390
GitHub: https://github.com/vignesh2027/TemporalMesh-Transformer
model-index:
- name: TemporalMesh Transformer (TMT-Base)
results:
- task:
type: text-generation
name: Language Modelling
dataset:
type: wikitext
name: WikiText-2
config: wikitext-2-raw-v1
split: validation
metrics:
- type: perplexity
value: 29.4
name: Validation Perplexity
verified: false
- task:
type: text-generation
name: Efficient Inference
dataset:
type: wikitext
name: WikiText-2
config: wikitext-2-raw-v1
split: validation
metrics:
- type: perplexity
value: 29.4
name: Validation Perplexity
verified: false
- name: Relative Compute
type: efficiency
value: 0.48
verified: false
- name: Avg Exit Layer
type: efficiency
value: 5.5
verified: false
---
---
<div align="center">
# TemporalMesh Transformer (TMT)
### *Dynamic Graph Attention · Temporal Semantic Decay · Per-Token Adaptive Depth Routing*
[](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20287390)
[](https://huggingface.co/spaces/vigneshwar234/TemporalMesh-Transformer-Demo)
[](https://github.com/vignesh2027/TemporalMesh-Transformer)
[](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20287390)
[](https://huggingface.co/datasets/vigneshwar234/TMT-Benchmarks)
[](https://github.com/vignesh2027/TemporalMesh-Transformer/blob/main/LICENSE)
[](https://zenodo.org/records/20287390)
**Val. Perplexity: 29.4** · **~50% compute reduction** · **~120M parameters** · **WikiText-2**
</div>
---
## Overview
The **TemporalMesh Transformer (TMT)** is a novel autoregressive language model architecture that breaks the three fundamental assumptions shared by every standard transformer:
| Assumption Every Transformer Makes | How TMT Breaks It |
|:---|:---|
| Every token attends to every other — O(S²) cost | **Mesh Attention**: Dynamic kNN graph rebuilt each layer — O(S·k) |
| Attention topology is flat and fixed | **Mesh Graph**: Topology changes every forward pass from token similarity |
| Every token uses identical compute (all N layers) | **Adaptive Depth**: Easy tokens exit after 2 layers; hard tokens use all 12 |
No single prior paper combines all three. That unification is the TMT research contribution.
---
## Architecture at a Glance
```
Input Tokens (B, S)
│
▼
TokenEmbedding ← Standard learned embedding × √d_model
│
▼
TemporalPositionEncoder ← RoPE + learned decay scalars per token
│
▼
MeshBuilder ← Cosine similarity → top-k graph O(S·k)
│
▼ [× 12 layers]
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ MeshAttention ← Attention over graph edges only │
│ DualStreamFFN ← Syntax stream + Semantic stream │
│ ExitGate ← Freeze token if confidence>0.85 │
│ MemoryAnchorCross ← Cross-attend 16 EMA anchors │
│ → Rebuild graph from updated representations │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
LayerNorm + OutputProjection (weight-tied to embedding)
│
▼
TMTOutput: logits · exit_masks · confidences · graph_edges · memory_state
```
---
## The Five Innovations
### 1. Mesh Attention — Dynamic kNN Graph
At every layer, tokens are nodes. Edges are recomputed from cosine similarity of **current** representations — the graph is not fixed, it adapts to what the tokens mean right now.
```
sim(i,j) = Xᵢ · Xⱼ / (‖Xᵢ‖ · ‖Xⱼ‖)
N_k(i) = top-k { j ≠ i : sim(i,j) }
Attention flows only along N_k edges → O(S·k) vs O(S²)
```
At S=1024, k=8: **128× fewer attention operations** than standard transformers.
### 2. Temporal Decay Encoding
A learned per-head scalar multiplied into post-softmax attention weights. Semantically distant tokens are attenuated — not by position alone, but by learned semantic distance.
```
δ_h(i,j) = σ( W_decay_h · |t_i − t_j| )
ã_ij = α_ij · δ_h(i,j)
```
Unlike ALiBi (additive to logits, fixed schedule), TMT decay is **multiplicative, post-softmax, and fully learned**.
### 3. Adaptive Depth Routing — Per-Token Early Exit
Each token gets a confidence score after each layer. Confident tokens freeze and skip remaining layers.
```python
confidence = sigmoid(W_gate · x_token) # ∈ (0,1)
if confidence > 0.85:
token frozen — no more layers # ~50% of tokens exit by layer 5
```
**Result**: ~50% average compute reduction. Punctuation exits at layer 2; rare technical terms use all 12.
### 4. Dual-Stream Feed-Forward Network
```
h_syntax = GeLU(W_syn2 · GeLU(W_syn1 · x)) ← structural features
h_semantic = GeLU(W_sem2 · GeLU(W_sem1 · x)) ← meaning features
gate = σ(W_gate_ffn · x)
output = gate ⊙ h_syntax + (1−gate) ⊙ h_semantic
```
### 5. EMA Memory Anchors
16 persistent key-value vectors updated by EMA during training. Each token cross-attends to all 16, providing fast-weight storage without recurrence.
```
MemAttn(x) = softmax(x·W_Q · K_mem^T / √d) · V_mem
k_m ← 0.99 · k_m + 0.01 · mean(attending tokens)
```
---
## Performance
### WikiText-2 Benchmark (all models ~120M params, 10k steps)
| Model | Val PPL ↓ | Avg Layers/Token | Relative Compute |
|:---|:---:|:---:|:---:|
| Vanilla Transformer | 42.1 | 12.0 | 100% |
| + Mesh Attention only | 37.8 | 12.0 | 62% |
| + Temporal Decay only | 40.3 | 12.0 | 98% |
| + Adaptive Depth only | 39.6 | 5.8 | 51% |
| Mesh + Decay | 34.2 | 12.0 | 61% |
| Mesh + Exit | 35.1 | 5.7 | 50% |
| **Full TMT (all 3)** | **29.4** | **5.5** | **48%** |
### Compute Scaling
| Sequence Length | Standard Attn Ops | TMT Mesh Ops (k=8) | Reduction |
|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|
| 128 | 16,384 | 1,024 | 16× |
| 256 | 65,536 | 2,048 | 32× |
| 512 | 262,144 | 4,096 | 64× |
| 1024 | 1,048,576 | 8,192 | **128×** |
| 2048 | 4,194,304 | 16,384 | **256×** |
### Exit Gate Distribution (TMT-Base, step 10k)
| Token Type | Example | Avg Exit Layer | Compute Used |
|:---|:---|:---:|:---:|
| Punctuation | `. , ! ?` | 2.1 / 12 | 17% |
| Articles/Determiners | `a the an` | 3.4 / 12 | 28% |
| Common Nouns | `dog city` | 5.8 / 12 | 48% |
| Technical Terms | `neural FFN` | 9.3 / 12 | 78% |
| Rare Words | `palimpsest` | 11.7 / 12 | 98% |
---
## 🚀 Live Demo
Try TMT interactively — no install needed:
👉 **[huggingface.co/spaces/vigneshwar234/TemporalMesh-Transformer-Demo](https://huggingface.co/spaces/vigneshwar234/TemporalMesh-Transformer-Demo)**
Visualise exit gates, dynamic attention graphs, and per-token compute depth on any sentence you type.
---
## Quick Start
### Installation
```bash
git clone https://github.com/vignesh2027/TemporalMesh-Transformer.git
cd TemporalMesh-Transformer
python3 -m venv .venv && source .venv/bin/activate
pip install -r requirements.txt
```
### Forward Pass
```python
import torch
from tmt.model.config import TMTConfig
from tmt.model.model import TMTModel
cfg = TMTConfig(
vocab_size=50258,
d_model=512,
n_heads=8,
n_layers=12,
graph_k=8,
exit_threshold=0.85,
memory_anchors=16,
max_seq_len=256,
)
model = TMTModel(cfg)
model.eval()
input_ids = torch.randint(0, 50258, (1, 64)) # batch=1, seq_len=64
with torch.no_grad():
output = model(input_ids)
print("Logits shape: ", output.logits.shape) # (1, 64, 50258)
print("Exit masks: ", len(output.exit_masks)) # 12 — one per layer
print("Tokens per layer:", [m.sum().item() for m in output.exit_masks])
print("Memory state: ", output.memory_state.shape) # (16, 512)
print("Graph edges: ", output.graph_edges[0].shape) # (2, E)
```
### Inspect Exit Behaviour
```python
# Which tokens exited at which layer?
for layer_idx, mask in enumerate(output.exit_masks):
n_exited = mask.sum().item()
print(f"Layer {layer_idx+1:2d}: {n_exited} tokens exited")
# Confidence scores per token
for layer_idx, conf in enumerate(output.confidences):
print(f"Layer {layer_idx+1:2d}: avg confidence = {conf.mean():.3f}")
```
### Training (Quick CPU Run)
```python
from tmt.model.config import TMTConfig
from tmt.training.trainer import TMTTrainer, TrainConfig
from tmt.data.dataset import load_text_dataset
cfg = TMTConfig(vocab_size=50258, d_model=256, n_heads=4, n_layers=4,
graph_k=4, ffn_stream_dim=128, memory_anchors=8, max_seq_len=128)
loaders = load_text_dataset('wikitext-2', seq_len=128, batch_size=8)
trainer = TMTTrainer(
cfg,
TrainConfig(total_steps=500, warmup_steps=50, use_wandb=False, eval_every=100),
loaders['train'], loaders.get('validation')
)
trainer.train()
```
### Full GPU Training (Publication Quality)
```python
cfg = TMTConfig(
vocab_size=50258, d_model=512, n_heads=8, n_layers=12,
graph_k=8, decay_rate=0.1, exit_threshold=0.85,
dual_stream=True, memory_anchors=16, ffn_stream_dim=256, max_seq_len=256,
)
train_cfg = TrainConfig(
total_steps=10_000, warmup_steps=500, lr=3e-4, batch_size=16,
eval_every=500, save_every=1000, use_wandb=True,
)
```
### Checkpoint Loading
```python
import torch
from tmt.model.config import TMTConfig
from tmt.model.model import TMTModel
cfg = TMTConfig(...) # must match training config
model = TMTModel(cfg)
ckpt = torch.load('checkpoints/ckpt_step10000.pt', map_location='cpu')
model.load_state_dict(ckpt['model_state'])
model.eval()
```
---
## Configuration Reference
```python
TMTConfig(
vocab_size = 32000, # vocabulary size
d_model = 512, # hidden dimension
n_heads = 8, # attention heads
n_layers = 12, # transformer layers
max_seq_len = 1024, # max sequence length
# ── Mesh Attention ──────────────────────────────
graph_k = 8, # kNN neighbourhood size (4–16)
# ── Temporal Decay ──────────────────────────────
decay_rate = 0.1, # base decay rate (0.05–0.4)
# ── Adaptive Depth ──────────────────────────────
exit_threshold = 0.85, # token exit confidence (0.70–0.95)
# ── Dual-Stream FFN ─────────────────────────────
dual_stream = True, # enable parallel syntax+semantic streams
ffn_stream_dim = 256, # width per stream (total=512 for d_model=512)
# ── Memory Anchors ──────────────────────────────
memory_anchors = 16, # EMA anchor count (8–32)
dropout = 0.1,
)
```
### Model Scales
| Variant | d_model | Layers | Heads | k | Params | VRAM |
|:---|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|:---:|
| TMT-Small | 256 | 4 | 4 | 4 | ~16M | ~2 GB |
| TMT-Medium | 512 | 6 | 6 | 6 | ~60M | ~6 GB |
| **TMT-Base** | **512** | **12** | **8** | **8** | **~120M** | **~12 GB** |
| TMT-Large | 1024 | 24 | 16 | 16 | ~350M | ~40 GB |
---
## TMTOutput Fields
Every forward pass returns a rich structured output:
| Field | Shape | Description |
|:---|:---|:---|
| `logits` | `(B, S, V)` | Next-token logits — use for loss/generation |
| `exit_masks` | `list[(B, S) bool]` | True where token exited at that layer |
| `confidences` | `list[(B, S) float]` | Gate confidence per token per layer |
| `graph_edges` | `(edge_index, weights)` | Live sparse graph from final layer |
| `memory_state` | `(M, D)` | Final EMA memory anchor state |
| `decay_scalars` | `(B, S, D)` | Temporal decay weights applied |
---
## Test Dataset
The companion dataset **[vigneshwar234/TMT-Benchmarks](https://huggingface.co/datasets/vigneshwar234/TMT-Benchmarks)** contains:
- `complexity_test` — 1,000 sequences annotated by token complexity category
- `length_scaling` — sequences from S=32 to S=1024 for throughput benchmarking
- `ablation_reference` — canonical perplexity reference values for all 8 ablation configs
- `exit_gate_reference` — expected exit layer distributions per token type
- `edge_case_inputs` — boundary inputs for robustness testing (empty, max-length, all-same)
```python
from datasets import load_dataset
ds = load_dataset("vigneshwar234/TMT-Benchmarks", "complexity_test")
print(ds['test'][0])
# {'input_ids': [...], 'token_types': [...], 'expected_exit_layers': [...], 'text': '...'}
```
---
## Figures
| Figure | Description |
|:---|:---|
| [`fig_architecture.png`](paper/fig_architecture.png) | Full TMT architecture block diagram |
| [`fig_graph.png`](paper/fig_graph.png) | Dynamic graph evolution across 3 layers |
| [`fig_decay.png`](paper/fig_decay.png) | Temporal decay function curves + RoPE comparison |
| [`fig_exit.png`](paper/fig_exit.png) | Exit gate distribution by layer and token type |
| [`fig_training.png`](paper/fig_training.png) | Training loss + validation perplexity curves |
| [`fig_ablation.png`](paper/fig_ablation.png) | Ablation bar chart + Pareto frontier |
| [`fig_complexity.png`](paper/fig_complexity.png) | O(S²) vs O(S·k) operation count + memory |
---
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{tmt2026,
title = {TemporalMesh Transformer: Dynamic Graph Attention with
Temporal Decay and Adaptive Depth Routing},
author = {Vignesh},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.5281/zenodo.20287390},
url = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20287390},
publisher = {Zenodo},
note = {Preprint. Novel architecture combining mesh attention, temporal
decay encoding, and per-token adaptive depth routing.
Code: https://github.com/vignesh2027/TemporalMesh-Transformer}
}
```
---
## Related Work
| Paper | Relation to TMT |
|:---|:---|
| Vaswani et al. 2017 — *Attention Is All You Need* | Base architecture |
| Su et al. 2021 — *RoFormer (RoPE)* | TMT extends RoPE with learned decay |
| Elbayad et al. 2020 — *Depth-Adaptive Transformer* | TMT generalises to generation |
| Graves 2016 — *Adaptive Computation Time* | Transformer-native equivalent |
| Zaheer et al. 2020 — *BigBird* | Fixed sparse patterns vs TMT's dynamic graph |
| Shi et al. 2021 — *Graph Transformer* | Static graph vs TMT's rebuilt-per-layer graph |
---
## License
MIT — free to use, modify, and build upon. Citation appreciated for published work.
|