--- license: other library_name: pytorch tags: - biology - bioinformatics - biosynthetic-gene-clusters - retrieval - protein-language-models - pfam - pytorch pipeline_tag: feature-extraction --- # BGC SetNet and Weighted Pfam Retrieval Models This repository contains the final five-seed model artifacts for the manuscript **"Sequence-Derived Representations versus Pfam-Domain Content for Biosynthetic Gene Cluster Retrieval"**. The release includes two model families: - **Pfam-augmented BGC-SetNet** (`pfam_setnet`): a Set Transformer encoder over frozen ESM-2 gene embeddings, relative gene positions, padding masks, and a BGC-level Pfam inventory embedding. - **Weighted Pfam Jaccard** (`weighted_pfam_jaccard`): learned non-negative Pfam-domain weights used in a weighted set-Jaccard retrieval baseline. The manuscript's main result is conservative: Pfam-domain content remains the strongest signal for this silver-label retrieval benchmark, while the ESM + BGC-SetNet + Pfam ensemble gives small, statistically unsupported gains on some secondary metrics. ## Repository Contents ```text checkpoints/ setnet/seed-20260810..20260814/ model.safetensors # verified model_state checkpoint config.json pfam_vocab.json phase2_history.json weighted_pfam/seed-20260810..20260814/ model.safetensors config.json pfam_vocab.json phase2_history.json evaluation/ # per-seed metadata, summaries, group/query outputs, alpha searches results/dgx_final/ # aggregate manuscript result tables source/ # source snapshot used for training/evaluation/provenance provenance/checkpoint_manifest.json ``` ## Evaluation Summary Family means over five optimization seeds and 16 held-out MIBiG-reference groups: | Method | Recall@50 | MRR | MAP | nDCG@50 | |---|---:|---:|---:|---:| | Raw ESM mean | 0.7946 | 0.2550 | 0.7251 | 0.8078 | | BGC-SetNet + Pfam | 0.8472 | 0.2786 | 0.7771 | 0.8502 | | Pfam Jaccard | 0.8788 | 0.3071 | 0.8480 | 0.9042 | | ESM + BGC-SetNet + Pfam | 0.8769 | 0.3096 | 0.8503 | 0.9058 | | Weighted Pfam Jaccard | 0.8789 | 0.3069 | 0.8477 | 0.9040 | The weighted Pfam Recall@50 advantage over unweighted Pfam is numerically tiny (+0.00003) and should not be interpreted as a meaningful improvement. ## Checkpoint Verification All ten source checkpoints were verified by SHA-256 before conversion to clean `model.safetensors` files. The split file hash used by the final run is: ```text dc26fae17e54fd2ad41a9e10353b3da3e0aacf3144b64f6ee62e8341b4360555 ``` See `provenance/checkpoint_manifest.json` for per-seed original checkpoint hashes, safetensors hashes, parameter counts, selected validation ensemble alpha, model config hashes, and split hashes. ## Minimal Loading Example ```python import json import torch from safetensors.torch import load_file from source.src.bgc_retrieval.model import ModelConfig, build_model seed_dir = "checkpoints/setnet/seed-20260810" config = json.load(open(f"{seed_dir}/config.json"))["model"] model = build_model(ModelConfig.from_dict(config)) state = load_file(f"{seed_dir}/model.safetensors") model.load_state_dict(state) model.eval() ``` For `pfam_setnet`, inference expects: - `gene_embeddings`: `[batch, genes, 1280]` frozen ESM-2 gene embeddings - `relative_positions`: `[batch, genes]` normalized gene positions - `padding_mask`: `[batch, genes]` boolean padding mask - `pfam_tokens`: `[batch, domains]` Pfam IDs encoded with `pfam_vocab.json` (`0` = padding, `1` = unknown) For `weighted_pfam_jaccard`, inference expects only `pfam_tokens` and returns learned domain weights; pairwise retrieval scores are computed with the model's `pairwise_jaccard` method. ## Intended Use These models are research artifacts for reproducing and auditing BGC retrieval experiments from the associated manuscript. They are not validated for clinical, diagnostic, regulatory, or production biological decision-making. ## Limitations - The benchmark labels are silver labels derived from shared MIBiG references, not a manually curated gold retrieval set. - The split is group-disjoint by MIBiG-reference group, but it is not a complete sequence-homology separation benchmark. - The strongest primary-metric methods are Pfam-based; learned sequence-derived representations did not show statistically supported superiority in this study. - The large input atlas, frozen ESM-2 embeddings, and raw gene annotation tables are not bundled in this model repository. - License terms are pending; contact the authors before reuse beyond inspection and reproducibility work. ## Citation Citation metadata will be updated after the preprint is posted. For now, cite the manuscript title above and this Hugging Face repository.