Upload all models and assets for csb (20251001)
Browse filesThis view is limited to 50 files because it contains too many changes.
See raw diff
- README.md +307 -132
- models/embeddings/monolingual/csb_128d.bin +2 -2
- models/embeddings/monolingual/csb_128d_metadata.json +5 -3
- models/embeddings/monolingual/csb_32d.bin +2 -2
- models/embeddings/monolingual/csb_32d_metadata.json +5 -3
- models/embeddings/monolingual/csb_64d.bin +2 -2
- models/embeddings/monolingual/csb_64d_metadata.json +5 -3
- models/subword_markov/csb_markov_ctx1_subword.parquet +2 -2
- models/subword_markov/csb_markov_ctx1_subword_metadata.json +2 -2
- models/subword_markov/csb_markov_ctx2_subword.parquet +2 -2
- models/subword_markov/csb_markov_ctx2_subword_metadata.json +2 -2
- models/subword_markov/csb_markov_ctx3_subword.parquet +2 -2
- models/subword_markov/csb_markov_ctx3_subword_metadata.json +2 -2
- models/subword_markov/csb_markov_ctx4_subword.parquet +2 -2
- models/subword_markov/csb_markov_ctx4_subword_metadata.json +2 -2
- models/subword_ngram/csb_2gram_subword.parquet +2 -2
- models/subword_ngram/csb_2gram_subword_metadata.json +2 -2
- models/subword_ngram/csb_3gram_subword.parquet +2 -2
- models/subword_ngram/csb_3gram_subword_metadata.json +2 -2
- models/subword_ngram/csb_4gram_subword.parquet +2 -2
- models/subword_ngram/csb_4gram_subword_metadata.json +2 -2
- models/tokenizer/csb_tokenizer_16k.model +2 -2
- models/tokenizer/csb_tokenizer_16k.vocab +0 -0
- models/tokenizer/csb_tokenizer_32k.model +2 -2
- models/tokenizer/csb_tokenizer_32k.vocab +0 -0
- models/tokenizer/csb_tokenizer_64k.model +2 -2
- models/tokenizer/csb_tokenizer_64k.vocab +0 -0
- models/tokenizer/csb_tokenizer_8k.model +2 -2
- models/tokenizer/csb_tokenizer_8k.vocab +0 -0
- models/vocabulary/csb_vocabulary.parquet +2 -2
- models/vocabulary/csb_vocabulary_metadata.json +10 -9
- models/word_markov/csb_markov_ctx1_word.parquet +2 -2
- models/word_markov/csb_markov_ctx1_word_metadata.json +2 -2
- models/word_markov/csb_markov_ctx2_word.parquet +2 -2
- models/word_markov/csb_markov_ctx2_word_metadata.json +2 -2
- models/word_markov/csb_markov_ctx3_word.parquet +2 -2
- models/word_markov/csb_markov_ctx3_word_metadata.json +2 -2
- models/word_markov/csb_markov_ctx4_word.parquet +2 -2
- models/word_markov/csb_markov_ctx4_word_metadata.json +2 -2
- models/word_ngram/csb_2gram_word.parquet +2 -2
- models/word_ngram/csb_2gram_word_metadata.json +2 -2
- models/word_ngram/csb_3gram_word.parquet +2 -2
- models/word_ngram/csb_3gram_word_metadata.json +2 -2
- models/word_ngram/csb_4gram_word.parquet +2 -2
- models/word_ngram/csb_4gram_word_metadata.json +2 -2
- visualizations/embedding_isotropy.png +0 -0
- visualizations/embedding_norms.png +0 -0
- visualizations/embedding_similarity.png +2 -2
- visualizations/markov_branching.png +0 -0
- visualizations/markov_contexts.png +0 -0
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -23,14 +23,14 @@ dataset_info:
|
|
| 23 |
metrics:
|
| 24 |
- name: best_compression_ratio
|
| 25 |
type: compression
|
| 26 |
-
value:
|
| 27 |
- name: best_isotropy
|
| 28 |
type: isotropy
|
| 29 |
-
value: 0.
|
| 30 |
- name: vocabulary_size
|
| 31 |
type: vocab
|
| 32 |
-
value:
|
| 33 |
-
generated:
|
| 34 |
---
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
# CSB - Wikilangs Models
|
|
@@ -44,12 +44,13 @@ We analyze tokenizers, n-gram models, Markov chains, vocabulary statistics, and
|
|
| 44 |
### Models & Assets
|
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
- Tokenizers (8k, 16k, 32k, 64k)
|
| 47 |
-
- N-gram models (2, 3, 4-gram)
|
| 48 |
-
- Markov chains (context of 1, 2, 3 and
|
| 49 |
- Subword N-gram and Markov chains
|
| 50 |
-
- Embeddings in various sizes and dimensions
|
| 51 |
- Language Vocabulary
|
| 52 |
- Language Statistics
|
|
|
|
| 53 |

|
| 54 |
|
| 55 |
### Analysis and Evaluation
|
|
@@ -59,7 +60,8 @@ We analyze tokenizers, n-gram models, Markov chains, vocabulary statistics, and
|
|
| 59 |
- [3. Markov Chain Evaluation](#3-markov-chain-evaluation)
|
| 60 |
- [4. Vocabulary Analysis](#4-vocabulary-analysis)
|
| 61 |
- [5. Word Embeddings Evaluation](#5-word-embeddings-evaluation)
|
| 62 |
-
- [6.
|
|
|
|
| 63 |
- [Metrics Glossary](#appendix-metrics-glossary--interpretation-guide)
|
| 64 |
- [Visualizations Index](#visualizations-index)
|
| 65 |
|
|
@@ -68,51 +70,57 @@ We analyze tokenizers, n-gram models, Markov chains, vocabulary statistics, and
|
|
| 68 |
|
| 69 |

|
| 70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 71 |
### Results
|
| 72 |
|
| 73 |
| Vocab Size | Compression | Avg Token Len | UNK Rate | Total Tokens |
|
| 74 |
|------------|-------------|---------------|----------|--------------|
|
| 75 |
-
| **8k** | 3.
|
| 76 |
-
| **16k** | 3.
|
| 77 |
-
| **32k** |
|
| 78 |
-
| **64k** |
|
| 79 |
|
| 80 |
### Tokenization Examples
|
| 81 |
|
| 82 |
Below are sample sentences tokenized with each vocabulary size:
|
| 83 |
|
| 84 |
-
**Sample 1:** `
|
| 85 |
|
| 86 |
| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
|
| 87 |
|-------|--------|-------|
|
| 88 |
-
| 8k | `▁
|
| 89 |
-
| 16k | `▁
|
| 90 |
-
| 32k | `▁
|
| 91 |
-
| 64k | `▁
|
| 92 |
|
| 93 |
-
**Sample 2:** `
|
| 94 |
|
| 95 |
| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
|
| 96 |
|-------|--------|-------|
|
| 97 |
-
| 8k | `▁
|
| 98 |
-
| 16k | `▁
|
| 99 |
-
| 32k | `▁
|
| 100 |
-
| 64k | `▁
|
| 101 |
|
| 102 |
-
**Sample 3:**
|
| 103 |
|
| 104 |
| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
|
| 105 |
|-------|--------|-------|
|
| 106 |
-
| 8k | `▁
|
| 107 |
-
| 16k |
|
| 108 |
-
| 32k |
|
| 109 |
-
| 64k |
|
| 110 |
|
| 111 |
|
| 112 |
### Key Findings
|
| 113 |
|
| 114 |
-
- **Best Compression:** 64k achieves
|
| 115 |
-
- **Lowest UNK Rate:** 8k with 0.
|
| 116 |
- **Trade-off:** Larger vocabularies improve compression but increase model size
|
| 117 |
- **Recommendation:** 32k vocabulary provides optimal balance for production use
|
| 118 |
|
|
@@ -121,55 +129,87 @@ Below are sample sentences tokenized with each vocabulary size:
|
|
| 121 |
|
| 122 |

|
| 123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 124 |

|
| 125 |
|
| 126 |
### Results
|
| 127 |
|
| 128 |
-
| N-gram | Perplexity | Entropy | Unique N-grams | Top-100 Coverage | Top-1000 Coverage |
|
| 129 |
-
|
| 130 |
-
| **2-gram** |
|
| 131 |
-
| **2-gram** |
|
| 132 |
-
| **3-gram** |
|
| 133 |
-
| **3-gram** |
|
| 134 |
-
| **4-gram** |
|
| 135 |
-
| **4-gram** |
|
| 136 |
|
| 137 |
### Top 5 N-grams by Size
|
| 138 |
|
| 139 |
-
**2-grams:**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 140 |
|
| 141 |
| Rank | N-gram | Count |
|
| 142 |
|------|--------|-------|
|
| 143 |
-
| 1 | `
|
| 144 |
-
| 2 | `
|
| 145 |
-
| 3 |
|
| 146 |
-
| 4 |
|
| 147 |
-
| 5 | `
|
| 148 |
|
| 149 |
-
**3-grams:**
|
| 150 |
|
| 151 |
| Rank | N-gram | Count |
|
| 152 |
|------|--------|-------|
|
| 153 |
-
| 1 |
|
| 154 |
-
| 2 |
|
| 155 |
-
| 3 | `
|
| 156 |
-
| 4 |
|
| 157 |
-
| 5 |
|
| 158 |
|
| 159 |
-
**4-grams:**
|
| 160 |
|
| 161 |
| Rank | N-gram | Count |
|
| 162 |
|------|--------|-------|
|
| 163 |
-
| 1 |
|
| 164 |
-
| 2 |
|
| 165 |
-
| 3 | `
|
| 166 |
-
| 4 |
|
| 167 |
-
| 5 | `
|
| 168 |
|
| 169 |
|
| 170 |
### Key Findings
|
| 171 |
|
| 172 |
-
- **Best Perplexity:** 2-gram with
|
| 173 |
- **Entropy Trend:** Decreases with larger n-grams (more predictable)
|
| 174 |
- **Coverage:** Top-1000 patterns cover ~33% of corpus
|
| 175 |
- **Recommendation:** 4-gram or 5-gram for best predictive performance
|
|
@@ -179,55 +219,86 @@ Below are sample sentences tokenized with each vocabulary size:
|
|
| 179 |
|
| 180 |

|
| 181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 182 |

|
| 183 |
|
| 184 |
### Results
|
| 185 |
|
| 186 |
-
| Context | Avg Entropy | Perplexity | Branching Factor | Unique Contexts | Predictability |
|
| 187 |
-
|
| 188 |
-
| **1** | 0.
|
| 189 |
-
| **1** | 1.
|
| 190 |
-
| **2** | 0.
|
| 191 |
-
| **2** |
|
| 192 |
-
| **3** | 0.
|
| 193 |
-
| **3** | 0.
|
| 194 |
-
| **4** | 0.
|
| 195 |
-
| **4** | 0.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 196 |
|
| 197 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 198 |
|
| 199 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 200 |
|
| 201 |
**Context Size 1:**
|
| 202 |
|
| 203 |
-
1.
|
| 204 |
-
2.
|
| 205 |
-
3. `
|
| 206 |
|
| 207 |
**Context Size 2:**
|
| 208 |
|
| 209 |
-
1. `
|
| 210 |
-
2. `
|
| 211 |
-
3.
|
| 212 |
|
| 213 |
**Context Size 3:**
|
| 214 |
|
| 215 |
-
1.
|
| 216 |
-
2.
|
| 217 |
-
3. `
|
| 218 |
|
| 219 |
**Context Size 4:**
|
| 220 |
|
| 221 |
-
1. `
|
| 222 |
-
2.
|
| 223 |
-
3. `
|
| 224 |
|
| 225 |
|
| 226 |
### Key Findings
|
| 227 |
|
| 228 |
-
- **Best Predictability:** Context-4 with
|
| 229 |
- **Branching Factor:** Decreases with context size (more deterministic)
|
| 230 |
-
- **Memory Trade-off:** Larger contexts require more storage (
|
| 231 |
- **Recommendation:** Context-3 or Context-4 for text generation
|
| 232 |
|
| 233 |
---
|
|
@@ -243,64 +314,64 @@ Below are text samples generated from each Markov chain model:
|
|
| 243 |
|
| 244 |
| Metric | Value |
|
| 245 |
|--------|-------|
|
| 246 |
-
| Vocabulary Size |
|
| 247 |
-
| Total Tokens |
|
| 248 |
-
| Mean Frequency |
|
| 249 |
| Median Frequency | 3 |
|
| 250 |
-
| Frequency Std Dev |
|
| 251 |
|
| 252 |
### Most Common Words
|
| 253 |
|
| 254 |
| Rank | Word | Frequency |
|
| 255 |
|------|------|-----------|
|
| 256 |
-
| 1 | w | 17,
|
| 257 |
-
| 2 | je | 7,
|
| 258 |
-
| 3 | i | 6,
|
| 259 |
-
| 4 |
|
| 260 |
-
| 5 |
|
| 261 |
-
| 6 |
|
| 262 |
-
| 7 |
|
| 263 |
-
| 8 |
|
| 264 |
-
| 9 |
|
| 265 |
-
| 10 |
|
| 266 |
|
| 267 |
### Least Common Words (from vocabulary)
|
| 268 |
|
| 269 |
| Rank | Word | Frequency |
|
| 270 |
|------|------|-----------|
|
| 271 |
-
| 1 |
|
| 272 |
-
| 2 |
|
| 273 |
-
| 3 |
|
| 274 |
-
| 4 |
|
| 275 |
-
| 5 |
|
| 276 |
-
| 6 |
|
| 277 |
-
| 7 |
|
| 278 |
-
| 8 |
|
| 279 |
-
| 9 |
|
| 280 |
-
| 10 |
|
| 281 |
|
| 282 |
### Zipf's Law Analysis
|
| 283 |
|
| 284 |
| Metric | Value |
|
| 285 |
|--------|-------|
|
| 286 |
-
| Zipf Coefficient | 0.
|
| 287 |
-
| R² (Goodness of Fit) | 0.
|
| 288 |
| Adherence Quality | **excellent** |
|
| 289 |
|
| 290 |
### Coverage Analysis
|
| 291 |
|
| 292 |
| Top N Words | Coverage |
|
| 293 |
|-------------|----------|
|
| 294 |
-
| Top 100 |
|
| 295 |
-
| Top 1,000 |
|
| 296 |
-
| Top 5,000 | 79.
|
| 297 |
-
| Top 10,000 | 87.
|
| 298 |
|
| 299 |
### Key Findings
|
| 300 |
|
| 301 |
-
- **Zipf Compliance:** R²=0.
|
| 302 |
-
- **High Frequency Dominance:** Top 100 words cover
|
| 303 |
-
- **Long Tail:**
|
| 304 |
|
| 305 |
---
|
| 306 |
## 5. Word Embeddings Evaluation
|
|
@@ -313,24 +384,125 @@ Below are text samples generated from each Markov chain model:
|
|
| 313 |
|
| 314 |

|
| 315 |
|
| 316 |
-
### Model Comparison
|
| 317 |
|
| 318 |
-
|
| 319 |
-
|
| 320 |
-
|
| 321 |
-
|
| 322 |
-
|
| 323 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 324 |
|
| 325 |
### Key Findings
|
| 326 |
|
| 327 |
-
- **Best Isotropy:** mono_32d with 0.
|
| 328 |
-
- **
|
| 329 |
-
- **
|
| 330 |
-
- **Recommendation:**
|
| 331 |
|
| 332 |
---
|
| 333 |
-
## 6.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 334 |
|
| 335 |

|
| 336 |
|
|
@@ -338,11 +510,12 @@ Below are text samples generated from each Markov chain model:
|
|
| 338 |
|
| 339 |
| Component | Recommended | Rationale |
|
| 340 |
|-----------|-------------|-----------|
|
| 341 |
-
| Tokenizer | **
|
| 342 |
-
| N-gram | **
|
| 343 |
-
| Markov | **Context-4** | Highest predictability (
|
| 344 |
| Embeddings | **100d** | Balanced semantic capture and isotropy |
|
| 345 |
|
|
|
|
| 346 |
---
|
| 347 |
## Appendix: Metrics Glossary & Interpretation Guide
|
| 348 |
|
|
@@ -532,7 +705,8 @@ If you use these models in your research, please cite:
|
|
| 532 |
author = {Kamali, Omar},
|
| 533 |
title = {Wikilangs: Open NLP Models for Wikipedia Languages},
|
| 534 |
year = {2025},
|
| 535 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 536 |
url = {https://huggingface.co/wikilangs}
|
| 537 |
institution = {Omneity Labs}
|
| 538 |
}
|
|
@@ -548,7 +722,8 @@ MIT License - Free for academic and commercial use.
|
|
| 548 |
- 🤗 Models: [huggingface.co/wikilangs](https://huggingface.co/wikilangs)
|
| 549 |
- 📊 Data: [wikipedia-monthly](https://huggingface.co/datasets/omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly)
|
| 550 |
- 👤 Author: [Omar Kamali](https://huggingface.co/omarkamali)
|
|
|
|
| 551 |
---
|
| 552 |
*Generated by Wikilangs Models Pipeline*
|
| 553 |
|
| 554 |
-
*Report Date:
|
|
|
|
| 23 |
metrics:
|
| 24 |
- name: best_compression_ratio
|
| 25 |
type: compression
|
| 26 |
+
value: 4.519
|
| 27 |
- name: best_isotropy
|
| 28 |
type: isotropy
|
| 29 |
+
value: 0.7759
|
| 30 |
- name: vocabulary_size
|
| 31 |
type: vocab
|
| 32 |
+
value: 0
|
| 33 |
+
generated: 2026-01-03
|
| 34 |
---
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
# CSB - Wikilangs Models
|
|
|
|
| 44 |
### Models & Assets
|
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
- Tokenizers (8k, 16k, 32k, 64k)
|
| 47 |
+
- N-gram models (2, 3, 4, 5-gram)
|
| 48 |
+
- Markov chains (context of 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5)
|
| 49 |
- Subword N-gram and Markov chains
|
| 50 |
+
- Embeddings in various sizes and dimensions (aligned and unaligned)
|
| 51 |
- Language Vocabulary
|
| 52 |
- Language Statistics
|
| 53 |
+
|
| 54 |

|
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
### Analysis and Evaluation
|
|
|
|
| 60 |
- [3. Markov Chain Evaluation](#3-markov-chain-evaluation)
|
| 61 |
- [4. Vocabulary Analysis](#4-vocabulary-analysis)
|
| 62 |
- [5. Word Embeddings Evaluation](#5-word-embeddings-evaluation)
|
| 63 |
+
- [6. Morphological Analysis (Experimental)](#6-morphological-analysis)
|
| 64 |
+
- [7. Summary & Recommendations](#7-summary--recommendations)
|
| 65 |
- [Metrics Glossary](#appendix-metrics-glossary--interpretation-guide)
|
| 66 |
- [Visualizations Index](#visualizations-index)
|
| 67 |
|
|
|
|
| 70 |
|
| 71 |

|
| 72 |
|
| 73 |
+

|
| 74 |
+
|
| 75 |
+

|
| 76 |
+
|
| 77 |
+

|
| 78 |
+
|
| 79 |
### Results
|
| 80 |
|
| 81 |
| Vocab Size | Compression | Avg Token Len | UNK Rate | Total Tokens |
|
| 82 |
|------------|-------------|---------------|----------|--------------|
|
| 83 |
+
| **8k** | 3.573x | 3.58 | 0.1681% | 180,853 |
|
| 84 |
+
| **16k** | 3.908x | 3.91 | 0.1839% | 165,322 |
|
| 85 |
+
| **32k** | 4.227x | 4.23 | 0.1989% | 152,876 |
|
| 86 |
+
| **64k** | 4.519x 🏆 | 4.53 | 0.2126% | 142,981 |
|
| 87 |
|
| 88 |
### Tokenization Examples
|
| 89 |
|
| 90 |
Below are sample sentences tokenized with each vocabulary size:
|
| 91 |
|
| 92 |
+
**Sample 1:** `Nowô Zelandzkô - je państwã na òstrowach Spòkójnégò Òceanu. w Aùstralëji i Ocean...`
|
| 93 |
|
| 94 |
| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
|
| 95 |
|-------|--------|-------|
|
| 96 |
+
| 8k | `▁nowô ▁zel an dzkô ▁- ▁je ▁państwã ▁na ▁òst rowa ... (+14 more)` | 24 |
|
| 97 |
+
| 16k | `▁nowô ▁zelan dzkô ▁- ▁je ▁państwã ▁na ▁òstrowach ▁spòkójnégò ▁òceanu ... (+6 more)` | 16 |
|
| 98 |
+
| 32k | `▁nowô ▁zelan dzkô ▁- ▁je ▁państwã ▁na ▁òstrowach ▁spòkójnégò ▁òceanu ... (+5 more)` | 15 |
|
| 99 |
+
| 64k | `▁nowô ▁zelandzkô ▁- ▁je ▁państwã ▁na ▁òstrowach ▁spòkójnégò ▁òceanu . ... (+4 more)` | 14 |
|
| 100 |
|
| 101 |
+
**Sample 2:** `802 / DCCCII 800 « 801 « 802 » 803 » 804 Wëdarzenia Ùrodzëlë sã Ùmarlë`
|
| 102 |
|
| 103 |
| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
|
| 104 |
|-------|--------|-------|
|
| 105 |
+
| 8k | `▁ 8 0 2 ▁/ ▁dccc ii ▁ 8 0 ... (+25 more)` | 35 |
|
| 106 |
+
| 16k | `▁ 8 0 2 ▁/ ▁dccc ii ▁ 8 0 ... (+25 more)` | 35 |
|
| 107 |
+
| 32k | `▁ 8 0 2 ▁/ ▁dccc ii ▁ 8 0 ... (+25 more)` | 35 |
|
| 108 |
+
| 64k | `▁ 8 0 2 ▁/ ▁dccc ii ▁ 8 0 ... (+25 more)` | 35 |
|
| 109 |
|
| 110 |
+
**Sample 3:** `Smierdzący bòcónk (Geranium robertianum L.) – to je jednorocznô abò dwalatnô ros...`
|
| 111 |
|
| 112 |
| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
|
| 113 |
|-------|--------|-------|
|
| 114 |
+
| 8k | `▁smier dzą cy ▁bòc ónk ▁( ge ra nium ▁robert ... (+26 more)` | 36 |
|
| 115 |
+
| 16k | `▁smier dzący ▁bòc ónk ▁( gera nium ▁robert ian um ... (+24 more)` | 34 |
|
| 116 |
+
| 32k | `▁smier dzący ▁bòc ónk ▁( gera nium ▁robert ian um ... (+23 more)` | 33 |
|
| 117 |
+
| 64k | `▁smier dzący ▁bòcónk ▁( geranium ▁robert ian um ▁l .) ... (+21 more)` | 31 |
|
| 118 |
|
| 119 |
|
| 120 |
### Key Findings
|
| 121 |
|
| 122 |
+
- **Best Compression:** 64k achieves 4.519x compression
|
| 123 |
+
- **Lowest UNK Rate:** 8k with 0.1681% unknown tokens
|
| 124 |
- **Trade-off:** Larger vocabularies improve compression but increase model size
|
| 125 |
- **Recommendation:** 32k vocabulary provides optimal balance for production use
|
| 126 |
|
|
|
|
| 129 |
|
| 130 |

|
| 131 |
|
| 132 |
+

|
| 133 |
+
|
| 134 |

|
| 135 |
|
| 136 |
### Results
|
| 137 |
|
| 138 |
+
| N-gram | Variant | Perplexity | Entropy | Unique N-grams | Top-100 Coverage | Top-1000 Coverage |
|
| 139 |
+
|--------|---------|------------|---------|----------------|------------------|-------------------|
|
| 140 |
+
| **2-gram** | Word | 1,973 | 10.95 | 6,252 | 31.3% | 68.4% |
|
| 141 |
+
| **2-gram** | Subword | 459 🏆 | 8.84 | 2,759 | 53.4% | 98.1% |
|
| 142 |
+
| **3-gram** | Word | 2,109 | 11.04 | 7,761 | 31.4% | 68.9% |
|
| 143 |
+
| **3-gram** | Subword | 3,977 | 11.96 | 22,668 | 18.9% | 58.0% |
|
| 144 |
+
| **4-gram** | Word | 3,756 | 11.88 | 15,387 | 27.9% | 59.4% |
|
| 145 |
+
| **4-gram** | Subword | 19,041 | 14.22 | 103,678 | 9.9% | 32.9% |
|
| 146 |
|
| 147 |
### Top 5 N-grams by Size
|
| 148 |
|
| 149 |
+
**2-grams (Word):**
|
| 150 |
+
|
| 151 |
+
| Rank | N-gram | Count |
|
| 152 |
+
|------|--------|-------|
|
| 153 |
+
| 1 | `to je` | 2,509 |
|
| 154 |
+
| 2 | `bùtnowé lënczi` | 1,441 |
|
| 155 |
+
| 3 | `ùrodzëlë sã` | 991 |
|
| 156 |
+
| 4 | `w gminie` | 982 |
|
| 157 |
+
| 5 | `m jin` | 873 |
|
| 158 |
+
|
| 159 |
+
**3-grams (Word):**
|
| 160 |
+
|
| 161 |
+
| Rank | N-gram | Count |
|
| 162 |
+
|------|--------|-------|
|
| 163 |
+
| 1 | `wëdarzenia ùrodzëlë sã` | 849 |
|
| 164 |
+
| 2 | `ùrodzëlë sã ùmarlë` | 814 |
|
| 165 |
+
| 3 | `w pòmòrsczim wòjewództwie` | 642 |
|
| 166 |
+
| 4 | `p p p` | 601 |
|
| 167 |
+
| 5 | `pòmòrsczim wòjewództwie w` | 543 |
|
| 168 |
+
|
| 169 |
+
**4-grams (Word):**
|
| 170 |
+
|
| 171 |
+
| Rank | N-gram | Count |
|
| 172 |
+
|------|--------|-------|
|
| 173 |
+
| 1 | `wëdarzenia ùrodzëlë sã ùmarlë` | 753 |
|
| 174 |
+
| 2 | `p p p p` | 566 |
|
| 175 |
+
| 3 | `w pòmòrsczim wòjewództwie w` | 537 |
|
| 176 |
+
| 4 | `królestwa i jinëch słowiańsczich` | 489 |
|
| 177 |
+
| 5 | `i jinëch słowiańsczich krajów` | 489 |
|
| 178 |
+
|
| 179 |
+
**2-grams (Subword):**
|
| 180 |
|
| 181 |
| Rank | N-gram | Count |
|
| 182 |
|------|--------|-------|
|
| 183 |
+
| 1 | `c z` | 39,994 |
|
| 184 |
+
| 2 | `a _` | 39,475 |
|
| 185 |
+
| 3 | `_ w` | 38,361 |
|
| 186 |
+
| 4 | `. _` | 33,310 |
|
| 187 |
+
| 5 | `_ p` | 33,120 |
|
| 188 |
|
| 189 |
+
**3-grams (Subword):**
|
| 190 |
|
| 191 |
| Rank | N-gram | Count |
|
| 192 |
|------|--------|-------|
|
| 193 |
+
| 1 | `c z i` | 17,651 |
|
| 194 |
+
| 2 | `_ w _` | 16,987 |
|
| 195 |
+
| 3 | `s c z` | 14,602 |
|
| 196 |
+
| 4 | `_ p ò` | 12,455 |
|
| 197 |
+
| 5 | `n a _` | 11,117 |
|
| 198 |
|
| 199 |
+
**4-grams (Subword):**
|
| 200 |
|
| 201 |
| Rank | N-gram | Count |
|
| 202 |
|------|--------|-------|
|
| 203 |
+
| 1 | `s c z i` | 9,987 |
|
| 204 |
+
| 2 | `c z i _` | 8,529 |
|
| 205 |
+
| 3 | `_ j e _` | 7,782 |
|
| 206 |
+
| 4 | `é g ò _` | 7,756 |
|
| 207 |
+
| 5 | `_ n a _` | 6,415 |
|
| 208 |
|
| 209 |
|
| 210 |
### Key Findings
|
| 211 |
|
| 212 |
+
- **Best Perplexity:** 2-gram (subword) with 459
|
| 213 |
- **Entropy Trend:** Decreases with larger n-grams (more predictable)
|
| 214 |
- **Coverage:** Top-1000 patterns cover ~33% of corpus
|
| 215 |
- **Recommendation:** 4-gram or 5-gram for best predictive performance
|
|
|
|
| 219 |
|
| 220 |

|
| 221 |
|
| 222 |
+

|
| 223 |
+
|
| 224 |

|
| 225 |
|
| 226 |
### Results
|
| 227 |
|
| 228 |
+
| Context | Variant | Avg Entropy | Perplexity | Branching Factor | Unique Contexts | Predictability |
|
| 229 |
+
|---------|---------|-------------|------------|------------------|-----------------|----------------|
|
| 230 |
+
| **1** | Word | 0.5452 | 1.459 | 2.98 | 81,304 | 45.5% |
|
| 231 |
+
| **1** | Subword | 1.0127 | 2.018 | 7.32 | 978 | 0.0% |
|
| 232 |
+
| **2** | Word | 0.1324 | 1.096 | 1.26 | 240,607 | 86.8% |
|
| 233 |
+
| **2** | Subword | 0.9831 | 1.977 | 6.04 | 7,148 | 1.7% |
|
| 234 |
+
| **3** | Word | 0.0409 | 1.029 | 1.07 | 299,264 | 95.9% |
|
| 235 |
+
| **3** | Subword | 0.8865 | 1.849 | 4.14 | 43,078 | 11.4% |
|
| 236 |
+
| **4** | Word | 0.0201 🏆 | 1.014 | 1.03 | 315,962 | 98.0% |
|
| 237 |
+
| **4** | Subword | 0.6527 | 1.572 | 2.59 | 178,117 | 34.7% |
|
| 238 |
+
|
| 239 |
+
### Generated Text Samples (Word-based)
|
| 240 |
+
|
| 241 |
+
Below are text samples generated from each word-based Markov chain model:
|
| 242 |
|
| 243 |
+
**Context Size 1:**
|
| 244 |
+
|
| 245 |
+
1. `w gminie wickò w nocë dlô biédnëch robòta jakno dzél wsë czelińskô hëta to béł pòlsczi`
|
| 246 |
+
2. `je rëba z rodzëznë lycosidae òna rosce m jin na zôczątkù leno w pò ùpôdkù kòmùnizmù`
|
| 247 |
+
3. `i białków zgòrzałégò zgòrzôłczi pòl jeziora potęgowskie to tak samò rok znoszą od średniowiecza do c...`
|
| 248 |
+
|
| 249 |
+
**Context Size 2:**
|
| 250 |
+
|
| 251 |
+
1. `to je dzél gardu grëdządza nad wisłą we zdrojach nova berlyn berlyn nigenberlin berlin berlinichen b...`
|
| 252 |
+
2. `bùtnowé lënczi tadzino w geògraficznym słowôrzu pòlsczégò królestwa i jinëch słowiańsczich krajów pù...`
|
| 253 |
+
3. `ùrodzëlë sã ùmarlë stolaté`
|
| 254 |
+
|
| 255 |
+
**Context Size 3:**
|
| 256 |
+
|
| 257 |
+
1. `wëdarzenia ùrodzëlë sã ùmarlë lesser giełdziński kòlekcjonéra dokôzów kùńsztu lesser giełdziński gaz...`
|
| 258 |
+
2. `ùrodzëlë sã ùmarlë kalãdôrz na hewòtny rok juliańsczi 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923`
|
| 259 |
+
3. `w pòmòrsczim wòjewództwie w kartësczim krézu w gminie pòtãgòwò w stołpsczim krézu w gminie przedkòwò...`
|
| 260 |
+
|
| 261 |
+
**Context Size 4:**
|
| 262 |
|
| 263 |
+
1. `wëdarzenia ùrodzëlë sã ùmarlë kalãdôrz na hewòtny rok juliańsczi 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956...`
|
| 264 |
+
2. `p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p p`
|
| 265 |
+
3. `w pòmòrsczim wòjewództwie w kartësczim krézu w òbéńdze gminë somònino tu w szkòle dzece ùczą sã kasz...`
|
| 266 |
+
|
| 267 |
+
|
| 268 |
+
### Generated Text Samples (Subword-based)
|
| 269 |
+
|
| 270 |
+
Below are text samples generated from each subword-based Markov chain model:
|
| 271 |
|
| 272 |
**Context Size 1:**
|
| 273 |
|
| 274 |
+
1. `_kaństrdk_gô_òdz`
|
| 275 |
+
2. `arstk:_todł_dnch`
|
| 276 |
+
3. `icze_zegòriczëni`
|
| 277 |
|
| 278 |
**Context Size 2:**
|
| 279 |
|
| 280 |
+
1. `cziwónégò._maińst`
|
| 281 |
+
2. `a_spòl.)_terticho`
|
| 282 |
+
3. `_w_rowimòriart_ka`
|
| 283 |
|
| 284 |
**Context Size 3:**
|
| 285 |
|
| 286 |
+
1. `czi,_„roxy_dobis_z`
|
| 287 |
+
2. `_w_chtërnym_są_z_d`
|
| 288 |
+
3. `sczé_czajny),_mie_`
|
| 289 |
|
| 290 |
**Context Size 4:**
|
| 291 |
|
| 292 |
+
1. `sczi_egipsczégò_pòc`
|
| 293 |
+
2. `czi_rôtësz_bëc_kòle`
|
| 294 |
+
3. `_je_człowiańsczi_kò`
|
| 295 |
|
| 296 |
|
| 297 |
### Key Findings
|
| 298 |
|
| 299 |
+
- **Best Predictability:** Context-4 (word) with 98.0% predictability
|
| 300 |
- **Branching Factor:** Decreases with context size (more deterministic)
|
| 301 |
+
- **Memory Trade-off:** Larger contexts require more storage (178,117 contexts)
|
| 302 |
- **Recommendation:** Context-3 or Context-4 for text generation
|
| 303 |
|
| 304 |
---
|
|
|
|
| 314 |
|
| 315 |
| Metric | Value |
|
| 316 |
|--------|-------|
|
| 317 |
+
| Vocabulary Size | 28,754 |
|
| 318 |
+
| Total Tokens | 367,683 |
|
| 319 |
+
| Mean Frequency | 12.79 |
|
| 320 |
| Median Frequency | 3 |
|
| 321 |
+
| Frequency Std Dev | 148.11 |
|
| 322 |
|
| 323 |
### Most Common Words
|
| 324 |
|
| 325 |
| Rank | Word | Frequency |
|
| 326 |
|------|------|-----------|
|
| 327 |
+
| 1 | w | 17,439 |
|
| 328 |
+
| 2 | je | 7,833 |
|
| 329 |
+
| 3 | i | 6,889 |
|
| 330 |
+
| 4 | na | 6,729 |
|
| 331 |
+
| 5 | z | 5,037 |
|
| 332 |
+
| 6 | to | 4,739 |
|
| 333 |
+
| 7 | sã | 3,695 |
|
| 334 |
+
| 8 | do | 3,401 |
|
| 335 |
+
| 9 | rok | 3,185 |
|
| 336 |
+
| 10 | a | 2,487 |
|
| 337 |
|
| 338 |
### Least Common Words (from vocabulary)
|
| 339 |
|
| 340 |
| Rank | Word | Frequency |
|
| 341 |
|------|------|-----------|
|
| 342 |
+
| 1 | szahada | 2 |
|
| 343 |
+
| 2 | allaha | 2 |
|
| 344 |
+
| 3 | الله | 2 |
|
| 345 |
+
| 4 | llāh | 2 |
|
| 346 |
+
| 5 | tatarzy | 2 |
|
| 347 |
+
| 6 | chtërzy | 2 |
|
| 348 |
+
| 7 | prevost | 2 |
|
| 349 |
+
| 8 | gwiôzdozbiór | 2 |
|
| 350 |
+
| 9 | discover | 2 |
|
| 351 |
+
| 10 | krakowska | 2 |
|
| 352 |
|
| 353 |
### Zipf's Law Analysis
|
| 354 |
|
| 355 |
| Metric | Value |
|
| 356 |
|--------|-------|
|
| 357 |
+
| Zipf Coefficient | 0.9905 |
|
| 358 |
+
| R² (Goodness of Fit) | 0.995948 |
|
| 359 |
| Adherence Quality | **excellent** |
|
| 360 |
|
| 361 |
### Coverage Analysis
|
| 362 |
|
| 363 |
| Top N Words | Coverage |
|
| 364 |
|-------------|----------|
|
| 365 |
+
| Top 100 | 36.0% |
|
| 366 |
+
| Top 1,000 | 63.2% |
|
| 367 |
+
| Top 5,000 | 79.8% |
|
| 368 |
+
| Top 10,000 | 87.4% |
|
| 369 |
|
| 370 |
### Key Findings
|
| 371 |
|
| 372 |
+
- **Zipf Compliance:** R²=0.9959 indicates excellent adherence to Zipf's law
|
| 373 |
+
- **High Frequency Dominance:** Top 100 words cover 36.0% of corpus
|
| 374 |
+
- **Long Tail:** 18,754 words needed for remaining 12.6% coverage
|
| 375 |
|
| 376 |
---
|
| 377 |
## 5. Word Embeddings Evaluation
|
|
|
|
| 384 |
|
| 385 |

|
| 386 |
|
|
|
|
| 387 |
|
| 388 |
+
### 5.1 Cross-Lingual Alignment
|
| 389 |
+
|
| 390 |
+
> *Note: Multilingual alignment visualization not available for this language.*
|
| 391 |
+
|
| 392 |
+
|
| 393 |
+
### 5.2 Model Comparison
|
| 394 |
+
|
| 395 |
+
| Model | Dimension | Isotropy | Semantic Density | Alignment R@1 | Alignment R@10 |
|
| 396 |
+
|-------|-----------|----------|------------------|---------------|----------------|
|
| 397 |
+
| **mono_32d** | 32 | 0.7759 🏆 | 0.3628 | N/A | N/A |
|
| 398 |
+
| **mono_64d** | 64 | 0.4956 | 0.3193 | N/A | N/A |
|
| 399 |
+
| **mono_128d** | 128 | 0.1441 | 0.3257 | N/A | N/A |
|
| 400 |
|
| 401 |
### Key Findings
|
| 402 |
|
| 403 |
+
- **Best Isotropy:** mono_32d with 0.7759 (more uniform distribution)
|
| 404 |
+
- **Semantic Density:** Average pairwise similarity of 0.3359. Lower values indicate better semantic separation.
|
| 405 |
+
- **Alignment Quality:** No aligned models evaluated in this run.
|
| 406 |
+
- **Recommendation:** 128d aligned for best cross-lingual performance
|
| 407 |
|
| 408 |
---
|
| 409 |
+
## 6. Morphological Analysis (Experimental)
|
| 410 |
+
|
| 411 |
+
> ⚠️ **Warning:** This language shows low morphological productivity. The statistical signals used for this analysis may be noisy or less reliable than for morphologically rich languages.
|
| 412 |
+
|
| 413 |
+
This section presents an automated morphological analysis derived from the statistical divergence between word-level and subword-level models. By analyzing where subword predictability spikes and where word-level coverage fails, we can infer linguistic structures without supervised data.
|
| 414 |
+
|
| 415 |
+
### 6.1 Productivity & Complexity
|
| 416 |
+
|
| 417 |
+
| Metric | Value | Interpretation | Recommendation |
|
| 418 |
+
|--------|-------|----------------|----------------|
|
| 419 |
+
| Productivity Index | **0.000** | Low morphological productivity | ⚠️ Likely unreliable |
|
| 420 |
+
| Idiomaticity Gap | **-1.000** | Low formulaic content | - |
|
| 421 |
+
|
| 422 |
+
### 6.2 Affix Inventory (Productive Units)
|
| 423 |
+
|
| 424 |
+
These are the most productive prefixes and suffixes identified by sampling the vocabulary for global substitutability patterns. A unit is considered an affix if stripping it leaves a valid stem that appears in other contexts.
|
| 425 |
+
|
| 426 |
+
#### Productive Prefixes
|
| 427 |
+
| Prefix | Examples |
|
| 428 |
+
|--------|----------|
|
| 429 |
+
| `-pr` | prozã, przerôbianié, prostonórta |
|
| 430 |
+
| `-pò` | pòmòcë, pòtémù, pòmòcnégò |
|
| 431 |
+
|
| 432 |
+
#### Productive Suffixes
|
| 433 |
+
| Suffix | Examples |
|
| 434 |
+
|--------|----------|
|
| 435 |
+
| `-a` | plëszka, svôta, jóna |
|
| 436 |
+
| `-ch` | chtërnich, artisticznëch, tarnowsczich |
|
| 437 |
+
| `-ów` | kònkùrsów, splecënków, piesniów |
|
| 438 |
+
| `-zi` | marokańsczi, hélsczi, esteticzi |
|
| 439 |
+
| `-czi` | marokańsczi, hélsczi, esteticzi |
|
| 440 |
+
|
| 441 |
+
### 6.3 Bound Stems (Lexical Roots)
|
| 442 |
+
|
| 443 |
+
Bound stems are high-frequency subword units that are semantically cohesive but rarely appear as standalone words. These often correspond to the 'core' of a word that requires inflection or derivation to be valid.
|
| 444 |
+
|
| 445 |
+
| Stem | Cohesion | Substitutability | Examples |
|
| 446 |
+
|------|----------|------------------|----------|
|
| 447 |
+
| `tërn` | 2.01x | 29 contexts | chtërną, chtërna, chtërnã |
|
| 448 |
+
| `htër` | 2.05x | 23 contexts | chtërô, chtërë, chtëre |
|
| 449 |
+
| `chtë` | 1.91x | 27 contexts | chtërô, chtërë, chtëre |
|
| 450 |
+
| `szëb` | 1.99x | 22 contexts | kaszëb, kaszëbi, kaszëba |
|
| 451 |
+
| `zeni` | 1.64x | 32 contexts | zenice, ùczenié, ùczeniô |
|
| 452 |
+
| `odzë` | 1.79x | 22 contexts | rodzëc, rodzënë, godzëną |
|
| 453 |
+
| `stol` | 1.78x | 20 contexts | stole, stolp, stolpe |
|
| 454 |
+
| `rodz` | 1.40x | 44 contexts | rodzy, rodze, rodzą |
|
| 455 |
+
| `aszë` | 1.91x | 14 contexts | kaszëb, kaszëbi, kaszëba |
|
| 456 |
+
| `sczé` | 1.41x | 30 contexts | rusczé, wąsczé, nisczé |
|
| 457 |
+
| `zëzn` | 1.40x | 29 contexts | rodzëzna, rodzëznë, żëdzëzna |
|
| 458 |
+
| `zëbs` | 2.04x | 9 contexts | kaszëbskô, kaszëbskù, kaszëbskò |
|
| 459 |
+
|
| 460 |
+
### 6.4 Affix Compatibility (Co-occurrence)
|
| 461 |
+
|
| 462 |
+
This table shows which prefixes and suffixes most frequently co-occur on the same stems, revealing the 'stacking' rules of the language's morphology.
|
| 463 |
+
|
| 464 |
+
| Prefix | Suffix | Frequency | Examples |
|
| 465 |
+
|--------|--------|-----------|----------|
|
| 466 |
+
| `-pr` | `-a` | 36 words | prałata, prawidła |
|
| 467 |
+
| `-pò` | `-a` | 22 words | pòéta, pòetka |
|
| 468 |
+
| `-pr` | `-ów` | 19 words | procëmników, przezeblôkańców |
|
| 469 |
+
| `-pò` | `-ch` | 15 words | pòlsczich, pòswiãconëch |
|
| 470 |
+
| `-pò` | `-zi` | 12 words | pòrénszi, pòwieczi |
|
| 471 |
+
| `-pò` | `-ów` | 12 words | pòétów, pòkôzków |
|
| 472 |
+
| `-pr` | `-ch` | 10 words | przédnich, prësach |
|
| 473 |
+
| `-pò` | `-czi` | 10 words | pòwieczi, pòprôwczi |
|
| 474 |
+
| `-pr` | `-zi` | 4 words | prëczkòwsczi, prekmùrsczi |
|
| 475 |
+
| `-pr` | `-czi` | 4 words | prëczkòwsczi, prekmùrsczi |
|
| 476 |
+
|
| 477 |
+
### 6.5 Recursive Morpheme Segmentation
|
| 478 |
+
|
| 479 |
+
Using **Recursive Hierarchical Substitutability**, we decompose complex words into their constituent morphemes. This approach handles nested affixes (e.g., `prefix-prefix-root-suffix`).
|
| 480 |
+
|
| 481 |
+
| Word | Suggested Split | Confidence | Stem |
|
| 482 |
+
|------|-----------------|------------|------|
|
| 483 |
+
| francesczi | **`frances-czi`** | 4.5 | `frances` |
|
| 484 |
+
| przebendowsczich | **`pr-zebendows-czi-ch`** | 4.5 | `zebendows` |
|
| 485 |
+
| rozmajitéch | **`rozmajité-ch`** | 4.5 | `rozmajité` |
|
| 486 |
+
| misyjnych | **`misyjny-ch`** | 4.5 | `misyjny` |
|
| 487 |
+
| kòloniach | **`kòlonia-ch`** | 4.5 | `kòlonia` |
|
| 488 |
+
| instrumentów | **`instrument-ów`** | 4.5 | `instrument` |
|
| 489 |
+
| òpòwiesców | **`òpòwiesc-ów`** | 4.5 | `òpòwiesc` |
|
| 490 |
+
| rockòwich | **`rockòwi-ch`** | 4.5 | `rockòwi` |
|
| 491 |
+
| nôrodnych | **`nôrodny-ch`** | 4.5 | `nôrodny` |
|
| 492 |
+
| kòntinentów | **`kòntinent-ów`** | 4.5 | `kòntinent` |
|
| 493 |
+
| chtërnich | **`chtërni-ch`** | 4.5 | `chtërni` |
|
| 494 |
+
| pierszëch | **`pierszë-ch`** | 4.5 | `pierszë` |
|
| 495 |
+
| napùlsczich | **`napùls-czi-ch`** | 3.0 | `napùls` |
|
| 496 |
+
| pòwijôczowatëch | **`pò-wijôczowatë-ch`** | 3.0 | `wijôczowatë` |
|
| 497 |
+
| profesorów | **`pr-ofesor-ów`** | 3.0 | `ofesor` |
|
| 498 |
+
|
| 499 |
+
### 6.6 Linguistic Interpretation
|
| 500 |
+
|
| 501 |
+
> **Automated Insight:**
|
| 502 |
+
The language CSB appears to be more isolating or has a highly fixed vocabulary. Word-level models perform nearly as well as subword models, indicating fewer productive morphological processes.
|
| 503 |
+
|
| 504 |
+
---
|
| 505 |
+
## 7. Summary & Recommendations
|
| 506 |
|
| 507 |

|
| 508 |
|
|
|
|
| 510 |
|
| 511 |
| Component | Recommended | Rationale |
|
| 512 |
|-----------|-------------|-----------|
|
| 513 |
+
| Tokenizer | **64k BPE** | Best compression (4.52x) |
|
| 514 |
+
| N-gram | **2-gram** | Lowest perplexity (459) |
|
| 515 |
+
| Markov | **Context-4** | Highest predictability (98.0%) |
|
| 516 |
| Embeddings | **100d** | Balanced semantic capture and isotropy |
|
| 517 |
|
| 518 |
+
|
| 519 |
---
|
| 520 |
## Appendix: Metrics Glossary & Interpretation Guide
|
| 521 |
|
|
|
|
| 705 |
author = {Kamali, Omar},
|
| 706 |
title = {Wikilangs: Open NLP Models for Wikipedia Languages},
|
| 707 |
year = {2025},
|
| 708 |
+
doi = {10.5281/zenodo.18073153},
|
| 709 |
+
publisher = {Zenodo},
|
| 710 |
url = {https://huggingface.co/wikilangs}
|
| 711 |
institution = {Omneity Labs}
|
| 712 |
}
|
|
|
|
| 722 |
- 🤗 Models: [huggingface.co/wikilangs](https://huggingface.co/wikilangs)
|
| 723 |
- 📊 Data: [wikipedia-monthly](https://huggingface.co/datasets/omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly)
|
| 724 |
- 👤 Author: [Omar Kamali](https://huggingface.co/omarkamali)
|
| 725 |
+
- 🤝 Sponsor: [Featherless AI](https://featherless.ai)
|
| 726 |
---
|
| 727 |
*Generated by Wikilangs Models Pipeline*
|
| 728 |
|
| 729 |
+
*Report Date: 2026-01-03 10:37:34*
|
models/embeddings/monolingual/csb_128d.bin
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
-
oid sha256:
|
| 3 |
-
size
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:41e6f20527f7bdf6b8fa87b31ba74d5a6f79ab296290f0dc98660613cb8a2fe1
|
| 3 |
+
size 1032826887
|
models/embeddings/monolingual/csb_128d_metadata.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -3,11 +3,13 @@
|
|
| 3 |
"dimension": 128,
|
| 4 |
"version": "monolingual",
|
| 5 |
"training_params": {
|
| 6 |
-
"
|
| 7 |
"min_count": 5,
|
| 8 |
"window": 5,
|
| 9 |
"negative": 5,
|
| 10 |
-
"epochs": 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
},
|
| 12 |
-
"vocab_size":
|
| 13 |
}
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
"dimension": 128,
|
| 4 |
"version": "monolingual",
|
| 5 |
"training_params": {
|
| 6 |
+
"algorithm": "skipgram",
|
| 7 |
"min_count": 5,
|
| 8 |
"window": 5,
|
| 9 |
"negative": 5,
|
| 10 |
+
"epochs": 5,
|
| 11 |
+
"encoding_method": "rope",
|
| 12 |
+
"dim": 128
|
| 13 |
},
|
| 14 |
+
"vocab_size": 8475
|
| 15 |
}
|
models/embeddings/monolingual/csb_32d.bin
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
-
oid sha256:
|
| 3 |
-
size
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:5cbc494ad59e671d08ac1ee2324782674a0601691c025b52f61a1dc262c55a50
|
| 3 |
+
size 258318087
|
models/embeddings/monolingual/csb_32d_metadata.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -3,11 +3,13 @@
|
|
| 3 |
"dimension": 32,
|
| 4 |
"version": "monolingual",
|
| 5 |
"training_params": {
|
| 6 |
-
"
|
| 7 |
"min_count": 5,
|
| 8 |
"window": 5,
|
| 9 |
"negative": 5,
|
| 10 |
-
"epochs": 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
},
|
| 12 |
-
"vocab_size":
|
| 13 |
}
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
"dimension": 32,
|
| 4 |
"version": "monolingual",
|
| 5 |
"training_params": {
|
| 6 |
+
"algorithm": "skipgram",
|
| 7 |
"min_count": 5,
|
| 8 |
"window": 5,
|
| 9 |
"negative": 5,
|
| 10 |
+
"epochs": 5,
|
| 11 |
+
"encoding_method": "rope",
|
| 12 |
+
"dim": 32
|
| 13 |
},
|
| 14 |
+
"vocab_size": 8475
|
| 15 |
}
|
models/embeddings/monolingual/csb_64d.bin
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
-
oid sha256:
|
| 3 |
-
size
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:bf5715a3cae0ee5b9bb8ac08a4ce47911ac64ce20e714c3910d2bc8b96c6e509
|
| 3 |
+
size 516487687
|
models/embeddings/monolingual/csb_64d_metadata.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -3,11 +3,13 @@
|
|
| 3 |
"dimension": 64,
|
| 4 |
"version": "monolingual",
|
| 5 |
"training_params": {
|
| 6 |
-
"
|
| 7 |
"min_count": 5,
|
| 8 |
"window": 5,
|
| 9 |
"negative": 5,
|
| 10 |
-
"epochs": 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
},
|
| 12 |
-
"vocab_size":
|
| 13 |
}
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
"dimension": 64,
|
| 4 |
"version": "monolingual",
|
| 5 |
"training_params": {
|
| 6 |
+
"algorithm": "skipgram",
|
| 7 |
"min_count": 5,
|
| 8 |
"window": 5,
|
| 9 |
"negative": 5,
|
| 10 |
+
"epochs": 5,
|
| 11 |
+
"encoding_method": "rope",
|
| 12 |
+
"dim": 64
|
| 13 |
},
|
| 14 |
+
"vocab_size": 8475
|
| 15 |
}
|
models/subword_markov/csb_markov_ctx1_subword.parquet
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
-
oid sha256:
|
| 3 |
-
size
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:3e05a853044730e6b38caaa21dbd01cd8c459c5c597d8ef1f2b019b62bd3a09b
|
| 3 |
+
size 59753
|
models/subword_markov/csb_markov_ctx1_subword_metadata.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -2,6 +2,6 @@
|
|
| 2 |
"context_size": 1,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "subword",
|
| 4 |
"language": "csb",
|
| 5 |
-
"unique_contexts":
|
| 6 |
-
"total_transitions":
|
| 7 |
}
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
"context_size": 1,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "subword",
|
| 4 |
"language": "csb",
|
| 5 |
+
"unique_contexts": 978,
|
| 6 |
+
"total_transitions": 2901533
|
| 7 |
}
|
models/subword_markov/csb_markov_ctx2_subword.parquet
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
-
oid sha256:
|
| 3 |
-
size
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:9c40dba7c966b35d871440a303053f29b981727b16a9711bc7f3b928ef397d93
|
| 3 |
+
size 348349
|
models/subword_markov/csb_markov_ctx2_subword_metadata.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -2,6 +2,6 @@
|
|
| 2 |
"context_size": 2,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "subword",
|
| 4 |
"language": "csb",
|
| 5 |
-
"unique_contexts":
|
| 6 |
-
"total_transitions":
|
| 7 |
}
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
"context_size": 2,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "subword",
|
| 4 |
"language": "csb",
|
| 5 |
+
"unique_contexts": 7148,
|
| 6 |
+
"total_transitions": 2896074
|
| 7 |
}
|
models/subword_markov/csb_markov_ctx3_subword.parquet
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
-
oid sha256:
|
| 3 |
-
size
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:baf3ffd5d454791b7f04ed0e159954822bec5bc7bb1ca316a99d9ff1110cb21b
|
| 3 |
+
size 1286038
|
models/subword_markov/csb_markov_ctx3_subword_metadata.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -2,6 +2,6 @@
|
|
| 2 |
"context_size": 3,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "subword",
|
| 4 |
"language": "csb",
|
| 5 |
-
"unique_contexts":
|
| 6 |
-
"total_transitions":
|
| 7 |
}
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
"context_size": 3,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "subword",
|
| 4 |
"language": "csb",
|
| 5 |
+
"unique_contexts": 43078,
|
| 6 |
+
"total_transitions": 2890615
|
| 7 |
}
|
models/subword_markov/csb_markov_ctx4_subword.parquet
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
-
oid sha256:
|
| 3 |
-
size
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:4c7319c1902c4efc845966ed77f3e54a04e733309dd3f842ad88f03e692305da
|
| 3 |
+
size 3560727
|
models/subword_markov/csb_markov_ctx4_subword_metadata.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -2,6 +2,6 @@
|
|
| 2 |
"context_size": 4,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "subword",
|
| 4 |
"language": "csb",
|
| 5 |
-
"unique_contexts":
|
| 6 |
-
"total_transitions":
|
| 7 |
}
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
"context_size": 4,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "subword",
|
| 4 |
"language": "csb",
|
| 5 |
+
"unique_contexts": 178117,
|
| 6 |
+
"total_transitions": 2885156
|
| 7 |
}
|
models/subword_ngram/csb_2gram_subword.parquet
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
-
oid sha256:
|
| 3 |
-
size
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:cd44ffe8316f9e70b216abc0f7350ace6965b2fb8ca598790d222616a87aa285
|
| 3 |
+
size 39483
|
models/subword_ngram/csb_2gram_subword_metadata.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -2,6 +2,6 @@
|
|
| 2 |
"n": 2,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "subword",
|
| 4 |
"language": "csb",
|
| 5 |
-
"unique_ngrams":
|
| 6 |
-
"total_ngrams":
|
| 7 |
}
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
"n": 2,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "subword",
|
| 4 |
"language": "csb",
|
| 5 |
+
"unique_ngrams": 2759,
|
| 6 |
+
"total_ngrams": 2901533
|
| 7 |
}
|
models/subword_ngram/csb_3gram_subword.parquet
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
-
oid sha256:
|
| 3 |
-
size
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:ae511b1aec2b3de495c0e9773d3546aa9f63c0161f1fd07bc6a21de62ebbc168
|
| 3 |
+
size 284170
|
models/subword_ngram/csb_3gram_subword_metadata.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -2,6 +2,6 @@
|
|
| 2 |
"n": 3,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "subword",
|
| 4 |
"language": "csb",
|
| 5 |
-
"unique_ngrams":
|
| 6 |
-
"total_ngrams":
|
| 7 |
}
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
"n": 3,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "subword",
|
| 4 |
"language": "csb",
|
| 5 |
+
"unique_ngrams": 22668,
|
| 6 |
+
"total_ngrams": 2896074
|
| 7 |
}
|
models/subword_ngram/csb_4gram_subword.parquet
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
-
oid sha256:
|
| 3 |
-
size
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:12babc3b06e25fb857cc7fd5e7bd597cfa74946c127a0e861d2126235b75b740
|
| 3 |
+
size 1210992
|
models/subword_ngram/csb_4gram_subword_metadata.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -2,6 +2,6 @@
|
|
| 2 |
"n": 4,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "subword",
|
| 4 |
"language": "csb",
|
| 5 |
-
"unique_ngrams":
|
| 6 |
-
"total_ngrams":
|
| 7 |
}
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
"n": 4,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "subword",
|
| 4 |
"language": "csb",
|
| 5 |
+
"unique_ngrams": 103678,
|
| 6 |
+
"total_ngrams": 2890615
|
| 7 |
}
|
models/tokenizer/csb_tokenizer_16k.model
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
-
oid sha256:
|
| 3 |
-
size
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:c396d5d00fa2d75c975c56bc121841f40ca7c7c22b9020fd8d1cada0062c2b40
|
| 3 |
+
size 512151
|
models/tokenizer/csb_tokenizer_16k.vocab
CHANGED
|
The diff for this file is too large to render.
See raw diff
|
|
|
models/tokenizer/csb_tokenizer_32k.model
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
-
oid sha256:
|
| 3 |
-
size
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:a45eb87760776eef205d9de1e20ab9be70fab5b15ea858044a82e52b6e3c863a
|
| 3 |
+
size 794869
|
models/tokenizer/csb_tokenizer_32k.vocab
CHANGED
|
The diff for this file is too large to render.
See raw diff
|
|
|
models/tokenizer/csb_tokenizer_64k.model
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
-
oid sha256:
|
| 3 |
-
size
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:7f9ecb06a069b33f750a0a07c327a2ef366efe2b86633a89f1e83698fc9f3c0b
|
| 3 |
+
size 1419438
|
models/tokenizer/csb_tokenizer_64k.vocab
CHANGED
|
The diff for this file is too large to render.
See raw diff
|
|
|
models/tokenizer/csb_tokenizer_8k.model
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
-
oid sha256:
|
| 3 |
-
size
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:a6e6f3cf7f11f412d56e5d102ff3e025a5475742bdbb3e47358ced7e86ca13cf
|
| 3 |
+
size 374756
|
models/tokenizer/csb_tokenizer_8k.vocab
CHANGED
|
The diff for this file is too large to render.
See raw diff
|
|
|
models/vocabulary/csb_vocabulary.parquet
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
-
oid sha256:
|
| 3 |
-
size
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:d4ec8917a796775c330b809302d26f7ef684e595a22733614a196066a8dc7d30
|
| 3 |
+
size 496629
|
models/vocabulary/csb_vocabulary_metadata.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,16 +1,17 @@
|
|
| 1 |
{
|
| 2 |
"language": "csb",
|
| 3 |
-
"vocabulary_size":
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
"statistics": {
|
| 5 |
-
"type_token_ratio": 0.
|
| 6 |
"coverage": {
|
| 7 |
-
"top_100": 0.
|
| 8 |
-
"top_1000": 0.
|
| 9 |
-
"top_5000": 0.
|
| 10 |
-
"top_10000": 0.
|
| 11 |
},
|
| 12 |
-
"hapax_count":
|
| 13 |
-
"hapax_ratio": 0.
|
| 14 |
-
"total_documents":
|
| 15 |
}
|
| 16 |
}
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
{
|
| 2 |
"language": "csb",
|
| 3 |
+
"vocabulary_size": 28754,
|
| 4 |
+
"variant": "full",
|
| 5 |
"statistics": {
|
| 6 |
+
"type_token_ratio": 0.19407197802851062,
|
| 7 |
"coverage": {
|
| 8 |
+
"top_100": 0.31498650560582103,
|
| 9 |
+
"top_1000": 0.5524925988895362,
|
| 10 |
+
"top_5000": 0.6979419562710293,
|
| 11 |
+
"top_10000": 0.7645555172454791
|
| 12 |
},
|
| 13 |
+
"hapax_count": 52862,
|
| 14 |
+
"hapax_ratio": 0.6476916290923348,
|
| 15 |
+
"total_documents": 5459
|
| 16 |
}
|
| 17 |
}
|
models/word_markov/csb_markov_ctx1_word.parquet
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
-
oid sha256:
|
| 3 |
-
size
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:e732ca9b72afa9a30e582ebd48d54d02ff69454bc3acb08680e67d5bbf2db206
|
| 3 |
+
size 2573619
|
models/word_markov/csb_markov_ctx1_word_metadata.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -2,6 +2,6 @@
|
|
| 2 |
"context_size": 1,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "word",
|
| 4 |
"language": "csb",
|
| 5 |
-
"unique_contexts":
|
| 6 |
-
"total_transitions":
|
| 7 |
}
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
"context_size": 1,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "word",
|
| 4 |
"language": "csb",
|
| 5 |
+
"unique_contexts": 81304,
|
| 6 |
+
"total_transitions": 415086
|
| 7 |
}
|
models/word_markov/csb_markov_ctx2_word.parquet
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
-
oid sha256:
|
| 3 |
-
size
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:2660c524e5ebffcf9e518ae94f1ef886c064dab42f134947c976da478ff1da2f
|
| 3 |
+
size 4877767
|
models/word_markov/csb_markov_ctx2_word_metadata.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -2,6 +2,6 @@
|
|
| 2 |
"context_size": 2,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "word",
|
| 4 |
"language": "csb",
|
| 5 |
-
"unique_contexts":
|
| 6 |
-
"total_transitions":
|
| 7 |
}
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
"context_size": 2,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "word",
|
| 4 |
"language": "csb",
|
| 5 |
+
"unique_contexts": 240607,
|
| 6 |
+
"total_transitions": 409627
|
| 7 |
}
|
models/word_markov/csb_markov_ctx3_word.parquet
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
-
oid sha256:
|
| 3 |
-
size
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:7cdd39ad4b22a2d46c4dd86b7ba493cfc9aa00961c4a78695d6c28451dc5014e
|
| 3 |
+
size 6113660
|
models/word_markov/csb_markov_ctx3_word_metadata.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -2,6 +2,6 @@
|
|
| 2 |
"context_size": 3,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "word",
|
| 4 |
"language": "csb",
|
| 5 |
-
"unique_contexts":
|
| 6 |
-
"total_transitions":
|
| 7 |
}
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
"context_size": 3,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "word",
|
| 4 |
"language": "csb",
|
| 5 |
+
"unique_contexts": 299264,
|
| 6 |
+
"total_transitions": 404168
|
| 7 |
}
|
models/word_markov/csb_markov_ctx4_word.parquet
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
-
oid sha256:
|
| 3 |
-
size
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:e4a131b7f2fd965fe3e9196ca03945933afddb0bd97b2b446cd73e589008419b
|
| 3 |
+
size 6859442
|
models/word_markov/csb_markov_ctx4_word_metadata.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -2,6 +2,6 @@
|
|
| 2 |
"context_size": 4,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "word",
|
| 4 |
"language": "csb",
|
| 5 |
-
"unique_contexts":
|
| 6 |
-
"total_transitions":
|
| 7 |
}
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
"context_size": 4,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "word",
|
| 4 |
"language": "csb",
|
| 5 |
+
"unique_contexts": 315962,
|
| 6 |
+
"total_transitions": 398709
|
| 7 |
}
|
models/word_ngram/csb_2gram_word.parquet
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
-
oid sha256:
|
| 3 |
-
size
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:375047bb84e33afd42996a82cbcef6a1015c6cbc7389fcb1b320d097c29be0a9
|
| 3 |
+
size 103421
|
models/word_ngram/csb_2gram_word_metadata.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -2,6 +2,6 @@
|
|
| 2 |
"n": 2,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "word",
|
| 4 |
"language": "csb",
|
| 5 |
-
"unique_ngrams":
|
| 6 |
-
"total_ngrams":
|
| 7 |
}
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
"n": 2,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "word",
|
| 4 |
"language": "csb",
|
| 5 |
+
"unique_ngrams": 6252,
|
| 6 |
+
"total_ngrams": 415086
|
| 7 |
}
|
models/word_ngram/csb_3gram_word.parquet
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
-
oid sha256:
|
| 3 |
-
size
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:e6983ae00497186207918a96454e42f53f8e079ce77c5077f14745b9d7388067
|
| 3 |
+
size 149464
|
models/word_ngram/csb_3gram_word_metadata.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -2,6 +2,6 @@
|
|
| 2 |
"n": 3,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "word",
|
| 4 |
"language": "csb",
|
| 5 |
-
"unique_ngrams":
|
| 6 |
-
"total_ngrams":
|
| 7 |
}
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
"n": 3,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "word",
|
| 4 |
"language": "csb",
|
| 5 |
+
"unique_ngrams": 7761,
|
| 6 |
+
"total_ngrams": 409627
|
| 7 |
}
|
models/word_ngram/csb_4gram_word.parquet
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
-
oid sha256:
|
| 3 |
-
size
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
|
| 2 |
+
oid sha256:cb8edf85039fc6a2284c7729e68323478ba49b2ad62cdb31a7d7ede73e764b9a
|
| 3 |
+
size 324365
|
models/word_ngram/csb_4gram_word_metadata.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -2,6 +2,6 @@
|
|
| 2 |
"n": 4,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "word",
|
| 4 |
"language": "csb",
|
| 5 |
-
"unique_ngrams":
|
| 6 |
-
"total_ngrams":
|
| 7 |
}
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
"n": 4,
|
| 3 |
"variant": "word",
|
| 4 |
"language": "csb",
|
| 5 |
+
"unique_ngrams": 15387,
|
| 6 |
+
"total_ngrams": 404168
|
| 7 |
}
|
visualizations/embedding_isotropy.png
CHANGED
|
|
visualizations/embedding_norms.png
CHANGED
|
|
visualizations/embedding_similarity.png
CHANGED
|
Git LFS Details
|
|
Git LFS Details
|
visualizations/markov_branching.png
CHANGED
|
|
visualizations/markov_contexts.png
CHANGED
|
|