Upload all models and assets for ff (latest)

.gitattributes

@@ -33,3 +33,10 @@ saved_model/**/* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *.zip filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *.zst filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *tfevents* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/embedding_similarity.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/embedding_tsne_multilingual.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/performance_dashboard.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/position_encoding_comparison.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/tsne_sentences.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/tsne_words.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/zipf_law.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text

README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,754 @@
+---
+language: ff
+language_name: Fula
+language_family: atlantic_other
+tags:
+  - wikilangs
+  - nlp
+  - tokenizer
+  - embeddings
+  - n-gram
+  - markov
+  - wikipedia
+  - feature-extraction
+  - sentence-similarity
+  - tokenization
+  - n-grams
+  - markov-chain
+  - text-mining
+  - fasttext
+  - babelvec
+  - vocabulous
+  - vocabulary
+  - monolingual
+  - family-atlantic_other
+license: mit
+library_name: wikilangs
+pipeline_tag: text-generation
+datasets:
+  - omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly
+dataset_info:
+  name: wikipedia-monthly
+  description: Monthly snapshots of Wikipedia articles across 300+ languages
+metrics:
+  - name: best_compression_ratio
+    type: compression
+    value: 4.156
+  - name: best_isotropy
+    type: isotropy
+    value: 0.8804
+  - name: vocabulary_size
+    type: vocab
+    value: 0
+generated: 2026-01-04
+---
+
+# Fula - Wikilangs Models
+## Comprehensive Research Report & Full Ablation Study
+
+This repository contains NLP models trained and evaluated by Wikilangs, specifically on **Fula** Wikipedia data.
+We analyze tokenizers, n-gram models, Markov chains, vocabulary statistics, and word embeddings.
+
+## 📋 Repository Contents
+
+### Models & Assets
+
+- Tokenizers (8k, 16k, 32k, 64k)
+- N-gram models (2, 3, 4, 5-gram)
+- Markov chains (context of 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5)
+- Subword N-gram and Markov chains
+- Embeddings in various sizes and dimensions (aligned and unaligned)
+- Language Vocabulary
+- Language Statistics
+
+![Performance Dashboard](visualizations/performance_dashboard.png)
+
+### Analysis and Evaluation
+
+- [1. Tokenizer Evaluation](#1-tokenizer-evaluation)
+- [2. N-gram Model Evaluation](#2-n-gram-model-evaluation)
+- [3. Markov Chain Evaluation](#3-markov-chain-evaluation)
+- [4. Vocabulary Analysis](#4-vocabulary-analysis)
+- [5. Word Embeddings Evaluation](#5-word-embeddings-evaluation)
+- [6. Morphological Analysis (Experimental)](#6--morphological-analysis-experimental)
+- [7. Summary & Recommendations](#7-summary--recommendations)
+- [Metrics Glossary](#appendix-metrics-glossary--interpretation-guide)
+- [Visualizations Index](#visualizations-index)
+
+---
+## 1. Tokenizer Evaluation
+
+![Tokenizer Compression](visualizations/tokenizer_compression.png)
+
+![Tokenizer Fertility](visualizations/tokenizer_fertility.png)
+
+![Tokenizer OOV](visualizations/tokenizer_oov.png)
+
+![Total Tokens](visualizations/tokenizer_total_tokens.png)
+
+### Results
+
+| Vocab Size | Compression | Avg Token Len | UNK Rate | Total Tokens |
+|------------|-------------|---------------|----------|--------------|
+| **8k** | 3.290x | 3.29 | 0.2095% | 458,165 |
+| **16k** | 3.629x | 3.63 | 0.2311% | 415,362 |
+| **32k** | 3.915x | 3.92 | 0.2494% | 384,993 |
+| **64k** | 4.156x 🏆 | 4.16 | 0.2647% | 362,620 |
+
+### Tokenization Examples
+
+Below are sample sentences tokenized with each vocabulary size:
+
+**Sample 1:** `Tuobo District is one of 10 districts of River Gee County, Liberia. As of the po...`
+
+| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
+|-------|--------|-------|
+| 8k | `▁tu o bo ▁district ▁is ▁one ▁of ▁ 1 0 ... (+23 more)` | 33 |
+| 16k | `▁tu o bo ▁district ▁is ▁one ▁of ▁ 1 0 ... (+21 more)` | 31 |
+| 32k | `▁tu o bo ▁district ▁is ▁one ▁of ▁ 1 0 ... (+21 more)` | 31 |
+| 64k | `▁tu obo ▁district ▁is ▁one ▁of ▁ 1 0 ▁districts ... (+20 more)` | 30 |
+
+**Sample 2:** `Sapele Latake hukuma pamarun Diiwal Delta lysidi Naajeeriya`
+
+| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
+|-------|--------|-------|
+| 8k | `▁sa pe le ▁lat ake ▁hukuma ▁pamarun ▁diiwal ▁delta ▁ly ... (+2 more)` | 12 |
+| 16k | `▁sa pe le ▁latake ▁hukuma ▁pamarun ▁diiwal ▁delta ▁lysidi ▁naajeeriya` | 10 |
+| 32k | `▁sapele ▁latake ▁hukuma ▁pamarun ▁diiwal ▁delta ▁lysidi ▁naajeeriya` | 8 |
+| 64k | `▁sapele ▁latake ▁hukuma ▁pamarun ▁diiwal ▁delta ▁lysidi ▁naajeeriya` | 8 |
+
+**Sample 3:** `Tienie ko wuro e nder diiwaan Grand Cape Mount, to leydi Liberiya.`
+
+| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
+|-------|--------|-------|
+| 8k | `▁ti en ie ▁ko ▁wuro ▁e ▁nder ▁diiwaan ▁grand ▁cape ... (+7 more)` | 17 |
+| 16k | `▁ti en ie ▁ko ▁wuro ▁e ▁nder ▁diiwaan ▁grand ▁cape ... (+6 more)` | 16 |
+| 32k | `▁ti en ie ▁ko ▁wuro ▁e ▁nder ▁diiwaan ▁grand ▁cape ... (+6 more)` | 16 |
+| 64k | `▁ti enie ▁ko ▁wuro ▁e ▁nder ▁diiwaan ▁grand ▁cape ▁mount ... (+5 more)` | 15 |
+
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Compression:** 64k achieves 4.156x compression
+- **Lowest UNK Rate:** 8k with 0.2095% unknown tokens
+- **Trade-off:** Larger vocabularies improve compression but increase model size
+- **Recommendation:** 32k vocabulary provides optimal balance for production use
+
+---
+## 2. N-gram Model Evaluation
+
+![N-gram Perplexity](visualizations/ngram_perplexity.png)
+
+![N-gram Unique](visualizations/ngram_unique.png)
+
+![N-gram Coverage](visualizations/ngram_coverage.png)
+
+### Results
+
+| N-gram | Variant | Perplexity | Entropy | Unique N-grams | Top-100 Coverage | Top-1000 Coverage |
+|--------|---------|------------|---------|----------------|------------------|-------------------|
+| **2-gram** | Word | 18,162 | 14.15 | 104,236 | 16.2% | 37.3% |
+| **2-gram** | Subword | 296 🏆 | 8.21 | 7,815 | 65.5% | 98.4% |
+| **3-gram** | Word | 53,854 | 15.72 | 187,942 | 10.0% | 24.1% |
+| **3-gram** | Subword | 2,479 | 11.28 | 53,321 | 26.0% | 70.2% |
+| **4-gram** | Word | 183,838 | 17.49 | 408,955 | 5.3% | 14.1% |
+| **4-gram** | Subword | 13,282 | 13.70 | 265,846 | 13.1% | 40.8% |
+| **5-gram** | Word | 193,974 | 17.57 | 342,827 | 4.9% | 12.3% |
+| **5-gram** | Subword | 45,941 | 15.49 | 723,015 | 8.8% | 27.6% |
+
+### Top 5 N-grams by Size
+
+**2-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `e nder` | 61,343 |
+| 2 | `e hitaande` | 32,860 |
+| 3 | `ko e` | 22,642 |
+| 4 | `jaaɓi haaɗtirde` | 19,214 |
+| 5 | `duɗal jaaɓi` | 17,989 |
+
+**3-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `duɗal jaaɓi haaɗtirde` | 17,974 |
+| 2 | `to duɗal jaaɓi` | 10,218 |
+| 3 | `e hitaande o` | 6,335 |
+| 4 | `e nder leydi` | 5,945 |
+| 5 | `e nder diiwaan` | 4,588 |
+
+**4-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `to duɗal jaaɓi haaɗtirde` | 10,215 |
+| 2 | `e asli mum ñalnde` | 3,566 |
+| 3 | `mw parser output reflist` | 3,258 |
+| 4 | `ko ɓuri heewde e` | 1,887 |
+| 5 | `gila e asli mum` | 1,729 |
+
+**5-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `gila e asli mum ñalnde` | 1,726 |
+| 2 | `ko e asli mum ñalnde` | 1,633 |
+| 3 | `mooftaa ko e asli mum` | 1,472 |
+| 4 | `moƴƴinaama gila e asli mum` | 1,404 |
+| 5 | `mw parser output reflist lower` | 1,396 |
+
+**2-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `e _` | 1,192,787 |
+| 2 | `o _` | 697,278 |
+| 3 | `a a` | 631,137 |
+| 4 | `i _` | 590,142 |
+| 5 | `d e` | 589,471 |
+
+**3-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `_ e _` | 366,386 |
+| 2 | `d e _` | 361,065 |
+| 3 | `n d e` | 340,092 |
+| 4 | `k o _` | 191,527 |
+| 5 | `_ k o` | 190,918 |
+
+**4-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `n d e _` | 190,566 |
+| 2 | `_ n d e` | 151,153 |
+| 3 | `_ k o _` | 147,651 |
+| 4 | `n d e r` | 106,570 |
+| 5 | `d e r _` | 101,274 |
+
+**5-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `n d e r _` | 100,326 |
+| 2 | `_ n d e r` | 99,998 |
+| 3 | `e _ n d e` | 89,458 |
+| 4 | `_ e _ n d` | 62,590 |
+| 5 | `_ i n a _` | 61,992 |
+
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Perplexity:** 2-gram (subword) with 296
+- **Entropy Trend:** Decreases with larger n-grams (more predictable)
+- **Coverage:** Top-1000 patterns cover ~28% of corpus
+- **Recommendation:** 4-gram or 5-gram for best predictive performance
+
+---
+## 3. Markov Chain Evaluation
+
+![Markov Entropy](visualizations/markov_entropy.png)
+
+![Markov Contexts](visualizations/markov_contexts.png)
+
+![Markov Branching](visualizations/markov_branching.png)
+
+### Results
+
+| Context | Variant | Avg Entropy | Perplexity | Branching Factor | Unique Contexts | Predictability |
+|---------|---------|-------------|------------|------------------|-----------------|----------------|
+| **1** | Word | 0.8658 | 1.822 | 7.09 | 238,209 | 13.4% |
+| **1** | Subword | 1.0967 | 2.139 | 6.46 | 4,268 | 0.0% |
+| **2** | Word | 0.2953 | 1.227 | 1.86 | 1,682,859 | 70.5% |
+| **2** | Subword | 0.7230 | 1.651 | 4.35 | 27,539 | 27.7% |
+| **3** | Word | 0.1250 | 1.091 | 1.26 | 3,111,793 | 87.5% |
+| **3** | Subword | 0.7226 | 1.650 | 3.82 | 119,629 | 27.7% |
+| **4** | Word | 0.0559 🏆 | 1.040 | 1.10 | 3,909,129 | 94.4% |
+| **4** | Subword | 0.6523 | 1.572 | 3.00 | 457,157 | 34.8% |
+
+### Generated Text Samples (Word-based)
+
+Below are text samples generated from each word-based Markov chain model:
+
+**Context Size 1:**
+
+1. `e fitinaaji gonɗi ɗer daga baro caggal wuro e ganndal paleontologie to tangi tehsil diiwaan lagos`
+2. `ko adii aisha halilu akilu winndi e apc mo anndaa e dow dow huutoreeji e nder`
+3. `nder cuuɗi 3 nde peeñii e doggol laawɗungol 1 mm 0 m abu muhammadu faade e`
+
+**Context Size 2:**
+
+1. `e nder eɓɓoore jaŋde coodguuli o siftorii e hitaande opitaal oo ina rokka kadi batte e peewnugol`
+2. `e hitaande nde martin timmini mbaydi ndii ɗuuɗal ngal heewaani ina maantiniree aksan grave yeru helm...`
+3. `ko e jannginde sosiyoloji 18 4 158 168 issn s2cid politik e jamaanu koloñaal ko adii hitaande`
+
+**Context Size 3:**
+
+1. `duɗal jaaɓi haaɗtirde makerere mooftaa ko e asli mum ñalnde 13 lewru abriil o arti e galle makko`
+2. `to duɗal jaaɓi haaɗtirde wharton to duɗal jaaɓi haaɗtirde madrasa islamia buxi bazar to leydi kuttak...`
+3. `e hitaande o joofni e 7 056 woote afolami suɓiima heddaade e celibateer e nder tikkere e ko`
+
+**Context Size 4:**
+
+1. `to duɗal jaaɓi haaɗtirde williams college e hitaande o heɓi ba e jaŋde ƴellitaare kuuɓtidinnde e jaŋ...`
+2. `e asli mum ñalnde keɓtinaa ko jaaynde duɗal jaaɓi haaɗtirde columbia to duɗal jaaɓi haaɗtirde bagdaa...`
+3. `mw parser output reflist reflist columns ol margin top 0 mw parser output reflist lower greek list s...`
+
+
+### Generated Text Samples (Subword-based)
+
+Below are text samples generated from each subword-based Markov chain model:
+
+**Context Size 1:**
+
+1. `_mpabileɓe_mwor_`
+2. `a_lita,_ошкараки`
+3. `edimeye_fo_wi_kk`
+
+**Context Size 2:**
+
+1. `e_ng_"gelloyɗe_e_`
+2. `o_wuuɓɓe_ɗaaweddi`
+3. `aayya._dogina_mu_`
+
+**Context Size 3:**
+
+1. `_e_kosa_tuugii_haa`
+2. `de_17_famɗam_huun,`
+3. `nde_8_oktooɓe_ype:`
+
+**Context Size 4:**
+
+1. `nde_dingirde_batte_`
+2. `_nde_23_lewru_ut_ha`
+3. `_ko_ñawɓe_22_mars_k`
+
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Predictability:** Context-4 (word) with 94.4% predictability
+- **Branching Factor:** Decreases with context size (more deterministic)
+- **Memory Trade-off:** Larger contexts require more storage (457,157 contexts)
+- **Recommendation:** Context-3 or Context-4 for text generation
+
+---
+## 4. Vocabulary Analysis
+
+![Zipf's Law](visualizations/zipf_law.png)
+
+![Top Words](visualizations/top20_words.png)
+
+![Coverage Curve](visualizations/vocab_coverage.png)
+
+### Statistics
+
+| Metric | Value |
+|--------|-------|
+| Vocabulary Size | 109,082 |
+| Total Tokens | 4,968,136 |
+| Mean Frequency | 45.54 |
+| Median Frequency | 4 |
+| Frequency Std Dev | 1398.20 |
+
+### Most Common Words
+
+| Rank | Word | Frequency |
+|------|------|-----------|
+| 1 | e | 374,881 |
+| 2 | ko | 151,825 |
+| 3 | nder | 99,826 |
+| 4 | o | 93,579 |
+| 5 | to | 65,456 |
+| 6 | ina | 62,692 |
+| 7 | hitaande | 48,933 |
+| 8 | ngam | 37,608 |
+| 9 | leydi | 35,673 |
+| 10 | nde | 31,552 |
+
+### Least Common Words (from vocabulary)
+
+| Rank | Word | Frequency |
+|------|------|-----------|
+| 1 | delee | 2 |
+| 2 | trokanter | 2 |
+| 3 | casteeji | 2 |
+| 4 | hoffa | 2 |
+| 5 | hallux | 2 |
+| 6 | falannde | 2 |
+| 7 | calthorpe | 2 |
+| 8 | stopes | 2 |
+| 9 | trokleer | 2 |
+| 10 | mortons | 2 |
+
+### Zipf's Law Analysis
+
+| Metric | Value |
+|--------|-------|
+| Zipf Coefficient | 1.1660 |
+| R² (Goodness of Fit) | 0.992989 |
+| Adherence Quality | **excellent** |
+
+### Coverage Analysis
+
+| Top N Words | Coverage |
+|-------------|----------|
+| Top 100 | 39.8% |
+| Top 1,000 | 67.8% |
+| Top 5,000 | 83.4% |
+| Top 10,000 | 88.4% |
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Zipf Compliance:** R²=0.9930 indicates excellent adherence to Zipf's law
+- **High Frequency Dominance:** Top 100 words cover 39.8% of corpus
+- **Long Tail:** 99,082 words needed for remaining 11.6% coverage
+
+---
+## 5. Word Embeddings Evaluation
+
+![Embedding Isotropy](visualizations/embedding_isotropy.png)
+
+![Similarity Matrix](visualizations/embedding_similarity.png)
+
+![t-SNE Words](visualizations/tsne_words.png)
+
+![t-SNE Sentences](visualizations/tsne_sentences.png)
+
+
+### 5.1 Cross-Lingual Alignment
+
+![Alignment Quality](visualizations/embedding_alignment_quality.png)
+
+![Multilingual t-SNE](visualizations/embedding_tsne_multilingual.png)
+
+
+### 5.2 Model Comparison
+
+| Model | Dimension | Isotropy | Semantic Density | Alignment R@1 | Alignment R@10 |
+|-------|-----------|----------|------------------|---------------|----------------|
+| **mono_32d** | 32 | 0.8735 | 0.3675 | N/A | N/A |
+| **mono_64d** | 64 | 0.8804 🏆 | 0.2760 | N/A | N/A |
+| **mono_128d** | 128 | 0.8690 | 0.2101 | N/A | N/A |
+| **aligned_32d** | 32 | 0.8735 | 0.3540 | 0.1020 | 0.3900 |
+| **aligned_64d** | 64 | 0.8804 | 0.2806 | 0.1860 | 0.5660 |
+| **aligned_128d** | 128 | 0.8690 | 0.2018 | 0.2480 | 0.6620 |
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Isotropy:** mono_64d with 0.8804 (more uniform distribution)
+- **Semantic Density:** Average pairwise similarity of 0.2817. Lower values indicate better semantic separation.
+- **Alignment Quality:** Aligned models achieve up to 24.8% R@1 in cross-lingual retrieval.
+- **Recommendation:** 128d aligned for best cross-lingual performance
+
+---
+## 6.  Morphological Analysis (Experimental)
+
+This section presents an automated morphological analysis derived from the statistical divergence between word-level and subword-level models. By analyzing where subword predictability spikes and where word-level coverage fails, we can infer linguistic structures without supervised data.
+
+### 6.1 Productivity & Complexity
+
+| Metric | Value | Interpretation | Recommendation |
+|--------|-------|----------------|----------------|
+| Productivity Index | **5.000** | High morphological productivity | Reliable analysis |
+| Idiomaticity Gap | **-0.556** | Low formulaic content | - |
+
+### 6.2 Affix Inventory (Productive Units)
+
+These are the most productive prefixes and suffixes identified by sampling the vocabulary for global substitutability patterns. A unit is considered an affix if stripping it leaves a valid stem that appears in other contexts.
+
+#### Productive Prefixes
+| Prefix | Examples |
+|--------|----------|
+| `-ma` | mallihemre, madaaw, mariam |
+
+#### Productive Suffixes
+| Suffix | Examples |
+|--------|----------|
+| `-e` | mallihemre, olive, 9ice |
+| `-ji` | notifikaaji, cedeeji, reenngooji |
+| `-de` | koɗorde, wiyde, nuunɗude |
+
+### 6.3 Bound Stems (Lexical Roots)
+
+Bound stems are high-frequency subword units that are semantically cohesive but rarely appear as standalone words. These often correspond to the 'core' of a word that requires inflection or derivation to be valid.
+
+| Stem | Cohesion | Substitutability | Examples |
+|------|----------|------------------|----------|
+| `anng` | 1.65x | 80 contexts | anngu, manngu, mannga |
+| `annd` | 1.37x | 157 contexts | annde, anndi, annda |
+| `innd` | 1.61x | 67 contexts | inndo, innde, inndi |
+| `ooji` | 1.58x | 72 contexts | sooji, jooji, booji |
+| `ande` | 1.39x | 126 contexts | ɓande, andes, wande |
+| `riya` | 1.51x | 75 contexts | riyaz, oriya, uriya |
+| `nnde` | 1.48x | 76 contexts | annde, innde, wonnde |
+| `goll` | 1.88x | 27 contexts | gollo, gollu, golla |
+| `hita` | 1.91x | 21 contexts | chita, shita, ichita |
+| `itaa` | 1.40x | 62 contexts | kitaa, gitaar, kitaab |
+| `aand` | 1.30x | 65 contexts | aande, aandi, naande |
+| `lnde` | 1.58x | 25 contexts | nalnde, jolnde, falnde |
+
+### 6.4 Affix Compatibility (Co-occurrence)
+
+This table shows which prefixes and suffixes most frequently co-occur on the same stems, revealing the 'stacking' rules of the language's morphology.
+
+| Prefix | Suffix | Frequency | Examples |
+|--------|--------|-----------|----------|
+| `-ma` | `-e` | 24 words | marylise, mahde |
+| `-ma` | `-de` | 7 words | mahde, mahaande |
+| `-ma` | `-ji` | 3 words | mabboji, mahngooji |
+
+### 6.5 Recursive Morpheme Segmentation
+
+Using **Recursive Hierarchical Substitutability**, we decompose complex words into their constituent morphemes. This approach handles nested affixes (e.g., `prefix-prefix-root-suffix`).
+
+| Word | Suggested Split | Confidence | Stem |
+|------|-----------------|------------|------|
+| jottoriide | **`jottorii-de`** | 4.5 | `jottorii` |
+| afrikaaji | **`afrikaa-ji`** | 4.5 | `afrikaa` |
+| hawtaagoji | **`hawtaago-ji`** | 4.5 | `hawtaago` |
+| jaaynooji | **`jaaynoo-ji`** | 4.5 | `jaaynoo` |
+| ajiboyede | **`ajiboye-de`** | 4.5 | `ajiboye` |
+| sungullaji | **`sungulla-ji`** | 4.5 | `sungulla` |
+| maagiyaŋkooji | **`ma-agiyaŋkoo-ji`** | 3.0 | `agiyaŋkoo` |
+| matsumoridate | **`ma-tsumoridate`** | 1.5 | `tsumoridate` |
+| makambako | **`ma-kambako`** | 1.5 | `kambako` |
+| temperaaji | **`temperaa-ji`** | 1.5 | `temperaa` |
+| telefoŋaaji | **`telefoŋaa-ji`** | 1.5 | `telefoŋaa` |
+| hangaruuji | **`hangaruu-ji`** | 1.5 | `hangaruu` |
+| mangeshkar | **`ma-ngeshkar`** | 1.5 | `ngeshkar` |
+| maldivian | **`ma-ldivian`** | 1.5 | `ldivian` |
+| datadowlaaji | **`datadowlaa-ji`** | 1.5 | `datadowlaa` |
+
+### 6.6 Linguistic Interpretation
+
+> **Automated Insight:**
+The language Fula shows high morphological productivity. The subword models are significantly more efficient than word models, suggesting a rich system of affixation or compounding.
+
+---
+## 7. Summary & Recommendations
+
+![Performance Dashboard](visualizations/performance_dashboard.png)
+
+### Production Recommendations
+
+| Component | Recommended | Rationale |
+|-----------|-------------|-----------|
+| Tokenizer | **64k BPE** | Best compression (4.16x) |
+| N-gram | **2-gram** | Lowest perplexity (296) |
+| Markov | **Context-4** | Highest predictability (94.4%) |
+| Embeddings | **100d** | Balanced semantic capture and isotropy |
+
+
+---
+## Appendix: Metrics Glossary & Interpretation Guide
+
+This section provides definitions, intuitions, and guidance for interpreting the metrics used throughout this report.
+
+### Tokenizer Metrics
+
+**Compression Ratio**
+> *Definition:* The ratio of characters to tokens (chars/token). Measures how efficiently the tokenizer represents text.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Higher compression means fewer tokens needed to represent the same text, reducing sequence lengths for downstream models. A 3x compression means ~3 characters per token on average.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Higher is generally better for efficiency, but extremely high compression may indicate overly aggressive merging that loses morphological information.
+
+**Average Token Length (Fertility)**
+> *Definition:* Mean number of characters per token produced by the tokenizer.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Reflects the granularity of tokenization. Longer tokens capture more context but may struggle with rare words; shorter tokens are more flexible but increase sequence length.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Balance between 2-5 characters for most languages. Arabic/morphologically-rich languages may benefit from slightly longer tokens.
+
+**Unknown Token Rate (OOV Rate)**
+> *Definition:* Percentage of tokens that map to the unknown/UNK token, indicating words the tokenizer cannot represent.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Lower OOV means better vocabulary coverage. High OOV indicates the tokenizer encounters many unseen character sequences.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Below 1% is excellent; below 5% is acceptable. BPE tokenizers typically achieve very low OOV due to subword fallback.
+
+### N-gram Model Metrics
+
+**Perplexity**
+> *Definition:* Measures how "surprised" the model is by test data. Mathematically: 2^(cross-entropy). Lower values indicate better prediction.
+>
+> *Intuition:* If perplexity is 100, the model is as uncertain as if choosing uniformly among 100 options at each step. A perplexity of 10 means effectively choosing among 10 equally likely options.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Lower is better. Perplexity decreases with larger n-grams (more context). Values vary widely by language and corpus size.
+
+**Entropy**
+> *Definition:* Average information content (in bits) needed to encode the next token given the context. Related to perplexity: perplexity = 2^entropy.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High entropy means high uncertainty/randomness; low entropy means predictable patterns. Natural language typically has entropy between 1-4 bits per character.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Lower entropy indicates more predictable text patterns. Entropy should decrease as n-gram size increases.
+
+**Coverage (Top-K)**
+> *Definition:* Percentage of corpus occurrences explained by the top K most frequent n-grams.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High coverage with few patterns indicates repetitive/formulaic text; low coverage suggests diverse vocabulary usage.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Depends on use case. For language modeling, moderate coverage (40-60% with top-1000) is typical for natural text.
+
+### Markov Chain Metrics
+
+**Average Entropy**
+> *Definition:* Mean entropy across all contexts, measuring average uncertainty in next-word prediction.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Lower entropy means the model is more confident about what comes next. Context-1 has high entropy (many possible next words); Context-4 has low entropy (few likely continuations).
+>
+> *What to seek:* Decreasing entropy with larger context sizes. Very low entropy (<0.1) indicates highly deterministic transitions.
+
+**Branching Factor**
+> *Definition:* Average number of unique next tokens observed for each context.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High branching = many possible continuations (flexible but uncertain); low branching = few options (predictable but potentially repetitive).
+>
+> *What to seek:* Branching factor should decrease with context size. Values near 1.0 indicate nearly deterministic chains.
+
+**Predictability**
+> *Definition:* Derived metric: (1 - normalized_entropy) × 100%. Indicates how deterministic the model's predictions are.
+>
+> *Intuition:* 100% predictability means the next word is always certain; 0% means completely random. Real text falls between these extremes.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Higher predictability for text generation quality, but too high (>98%) may produce repetitive output.
+
+### Vocabulary & Zipf's Law Metrics
+
+**Zipf's Coefficient**
+> *Definition:* The slope of the log-log plot of word frequency vs. rank. Zipf's law predicts this should be approximately -1.
+>
+> *Intuition:* A coefficient near -1 indicates the corpus follows natural language patterns where a few words are very common and most words are rare.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Values between -0.8 and -1.2 indicate healthy natural language distribution. Deviations may suggest domain-specific or artificial text.
+
+**R² (Coefficient of Determination)**
+> *Definition:* Measures how well the linear fit explains the frequency-rank relationship. Ranges from 0 to 1.
+>
+> *Intuition:* R² near 1.0 means the data closely follows Zipf's law; lower values indicate deviation from expected word frequency patterns.
+>
+> *What to seek:* R² > 0.95 is excellent; > 0.99 indicates near-perfect Zipf adherence typical of large natural corpora.
+
+**Vocabulary Coverage**
+> *Definition:* Cumulative percentage of corpus tokens accounted for by the top N words.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Shows how concentrated word usage is. If top-100 words cover 50% of text, the corpus relies heavily on common words.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Top-100 covering 30-50% is typical. Higher coverage indicates more repetitive text; lower suggests richer vocabulary.
+
+### Word Embedding Metrics
+
+**Isotropy**
+> *Definition:* Measures how uniformly distributed vectors are in the embedding space. Computed as the ratio of minimum to maximum singular values.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High isotropy (near 1.0) means vectors spread evenly in all directions; low isotropy means vectors cluster in certain directions, reducing expressiveness.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Higher isotropy generally indicates better-quality embeddings. Values > 0.1 are reasonable; > 0.3 is good. Lower-dimensional embeddings tend to have higher isotropy.
+
+**Average Norm**
+> *Definition:* Mean magnitude (L2 norm) of word vectors in the embedding space.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Indicates the typical "length" of vectors. Consistent norms suggest stable training; high variance may indicate some words are undertrained.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Relatively consistent norms across models. The absolute value matters less than consistency (low std deviation).
+
+**Cosine Similarity**
+> *Definition:* Measures angular similarity between vectors, ranging from -1 (opposite) to 1 (identical direction).
+>
+> *Intuition:* Words with similar meanings should have high cosine similarity. This is the standard metric for semantic relatedness in embeddings.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Semantically related words should score > 0.5; unrelated words should be near 0. Synonyms often score > 0.7.
+
+**t-SNE Visualization**
+> *Definition:* t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding - a dimensionality reduction technique that preserves local structure for visualization.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Clusters in t-SNE plots indicate groups of semantically related words. Spread indicates vocabulary diversity; tight clusters suggest semantic coherence.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Meaningful clusters (e.g., numbers together, verbs together). Avoid over-interpreting distances - t-SNE preserves local, not global, structure.
+
+### General Interpretation Guidelines
+
+1. **Compare within model families:** Metrics are most meaningful when comparing models of the same type (e.g., 8k vs 64k tokenizer).
+2. **Consider trade-offs:** Better performance on one metric often comes at the cost of another (e.g., compression vs. OOV rate).
+3. **Context matters:** Optimal values depend on downstream tasks. Text generation may prioritize different metrics than classification.
+4. **Corpus influence:** All metrics are influenced by corpus characteristics. Wikipedia text differs from social media or literature.
+5. **Language-specific patterns:** Morphologically rich languages (like Arabic) may show different optimal ranges than analytic languages.
+
+
+### Visualizations Index
+
+| Visualization | Description |
+|---------------|-------------|
+| Tokenizer Compression | Compression ratios by vocabulary size |
+| Tokenizer Fertility | Average token length by vocabulary |
+| Tokenizer OOV | Unknown token rates |
+| Tokenizer Total Tokens | Total tokens by vocabulary |
+| N-gram Perplexity | Perplexity by n-gram size |
+| N-gram Entropy | Entropy by n-gram size |
+| N-gram Coverage | Top pattern coverage |
+| N-gram Unique | Unique n-gram counts |
+| Markov Entropy | Entropy by context size |
+| Markov Branching | Branching factor by context |
+| Markov Contexts | Unique context counts |
+| Zipf's Law | Frequency-rank distribution with fit |
+| Vocab Frequency | Word frequency distribution |
+| Top 20 Words | Most frequent words |
+| Vocab Coverage | Cumulative coverage curve |
+| Embedding Isotropy | Vector space uniformity |
+| Embedding Norms | Vector magnitude distribution |
+| Embedding Similarity | Word similarity heatmap |
+| Nearest Neighbors | Similar words for key terms |
+| t-SNE Words | 2D word embedding visualization |
+| t-SNE Sentences | 2D sentence embedding visualization |
+| Position Encoding | Encoding method comparison |
+| Model Sizes | Storage requirements |
+| Performance Dashboard | Comprehensive performance overview |
+
+---
+## About This Project
+
+### Data Source
+
+Models trained on [wikipedia-monthly](https://huggingface.co/datasets/omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly) - a monthly snapshot of Wikipedia articles across 300+ languages.
+
+### Project
+
+A project by **[Wikilangs](https://wikilangs.org)** - Open-source NLP models for every Wikipedia language.
+
+### Maintainer
+
+[Omar Kamali](https://omarkamali.com) - [Omneity Labs](https://omneitylabs.com)
+
+### Citation
+
+If you use these models in your research, please cite:
+
+```bibtex
+@misc{wikilangs2025,
+  author = {Kamali, Omar},
+  title = {Wikilangs: Open NLP Models for Wikipedia Languages},
+  year = {2025},
+  doi = {10.5281/zenodo.18073153},
+  publisher = {Zenodo},
+  url = {https://huggingface.co/wikilangs}
+  institution = {Omneity Labs}
+}
+```
+
+### License
+
+MIT License - Free for academic and commercial use.
+
+### Links
+
+- 🌐 Website: [wikilangs.org](https://wikilangs.org)
+- 🤗 Models: [huggingface.co/wikilangs](https://huggingface.co/wikilangs)
+- 📊 Data: [wikipedia-monthly](https://huggingface.co/datasets/omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly)
+- 👤 Author: [Omar Kamali](https://huggingface.co/omarkamali)
+- 🤝 Sponsor: [Featherless AI](https://featherless.ai)
+---
+*Generated by Wikilangs Models Pipeline*
+
+*Report Date: 2026-01-04 15:09:43*

models/embeddings/aligned/ff_128d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:93977a1a433835244686b02841fb3636775a37d6615edeacfa3332338f398717
+size 1084377329

models/embeddings/aligned/ff_128d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "ff", "dim": 128, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": true}

models/embeddings/aligned/ff_128d.projection.npy

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:858e4ab257f67051f17a06af7e683d00786b51bd88cbcdf0623f9ffd7a822ea5
+size 65664

models/embeddings/aligned/ff_128d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+{
+  "language": "ff",
+  "dimension": 128,
+  "version": "aligned",
+  "hub_language": "en",
+  "seed_vocab_size": 24014,
+  "vocab_size": 57974
+}

models/embeddings/aligned/ff_32d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:01a8ce9dd6963b625aec8b358b6e88f36be99c7bffeac9cb3ce38f4c3c57047a
+size 271853297

models/embeddings/aligned/ff_32d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "ff", "dim": 32, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": true}

models/embeddings/aligned/ff_32d.projection.npy

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:94c034f4ab1b3a682aa1fd7c1b097bd2fb859811f82a90b29e86f7f8a8b951b2
+size 4224

models/embeddings/aligned/ff_32d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+{
+  "language": "ff",
+  "dimension": 32,
+  "version": "aligned",
+  "hub_language": "en",
+  "seed_vocab_size": 24014,
+  "vocab_size": 57974
+}

models/embeddings/aligned/ff_64d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:aca24076692e88659d4851a757b5f7dbda7345e25c28997a595d3b8ea4cb2b2e
+size 542694641

models/embeddings/aligned/ff_64d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "ff", "dim": 64, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": true}

models/embeddings/aligned/ff_64d.projection.npy

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:ef834f000613ce88df68ec9863bf061d15da7075b1b498bc5331ff0dbccaff36
+size 16512

models/embeddings/aligned/ff_64d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+{
+  "language": "ff",
+  "dimension": 64,
+  "version": "aligned",
+  "hub_language": "en",
+  "seed_vocab_size": 24014,
+  "vocab_size": 57974
+}

models/embeddings/monolingual/ff_128d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:93977a1a433835244686b02841fb3636775a37d6615edeacfa3332338f398717
+size 1084377329

models/embeddings/monolingual/ff_128d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "ff", "dim": 128, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": false}

models/embeddings/monolingual/ff_128d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+{
+  "language": "ff",
+  "dimension": 128,
+  "version": "monolingual",
+  "training_params": {
+    "algorithm": "skipgram",
+    "min_count": 5,
+    "window": 5,
+    "negative": 5,
+    "epochs": 5,
+    "encoding_method": "rope",
+    "dim": 128
+  },
+  "vocab_size": 57974
+}

models/embeddings/monolingual/ff_32d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:01a8ce9dd6963b625aec8b358b6e88f36be99c7bffeac9cb3ce38f4c3c57047a
+size 271853297

models/embeddings/monolingual/ff_32d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "ff", "dim": 32, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": false}

models/embeddings/monolingual/ff_32d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+{
+  "language": "ff",
+  "dimension": 32,
+  "version": "monolingual",
+  "training_params": {
+    "algorithm": "skipgram",
+    "min_count": 5,
+    "window": 5,
+    "negative": 5,
+    "epochs": 5,
+    "encoding_method": "rope",
+    "dim": 32
+  },
+  "vocab_size": 57974
+}

models/embeddings/monolingual/ff_64d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:aca24076692e88659d4851a757b5f7dbda7345e25c28997a595d3b8ea4cb2b2e
+size 542694641

models/embeddings/monolingual/ff_64d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "ff", "dim": 64, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": false}

models/embeddings/monolingual/ff_64d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+{
+  "language": "ff",
+  "dimension": 64,
+  "version": "monolingual",
+  "training_params": {
+    "algorithm": "skipgram",
+    "min_count": 5,
+    "window": 5,
+    "negative": 5,
+    "epochs": 5,
+    "encoding_method": "rope",
+    "dim": 64
+  },
+  "vocab_size": 57974
+}

models/subword_markov/ff_markov_ctx1_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:b6e6f666ca54545b1ba29742fcc07ea37d6a3c4c2216abfacee101043f4afece
+size 216394

models/subword_markov/ff_markov_ctx1_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 1,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "ff",
+  "unique_contexts": 4268,
+  "total_transitions": 31387941
+}

models/subword_markov/ff_markov_ctx2_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:10d869ba85322821e24db88fccdd17f1f2acc3975e29720730995e0afc0a48f8
+size 1038754

models/subword_markov/ff_markov_ctx2_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 2,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "ff",
+  "unique_contexts": 27539,
+  "total_transitions": 31364201
+}

models/subword_markov/ff_markov_ctx3_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:afb47caa8cceb87ef57dcc71010f3ca775a2753f952fd6af0edb9b399e318dbc
+size 3747734

models/subword_markov/ff_markov_ctx3_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 3,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "ff",
+  "unique_contexts": 119629,
+  "total_transitions": 31340461
+}

models/subword_markov/ff_markov_ctx4_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:f44a28f651b339849539fa483222ecb1ef7d995d3cab53c739b4f480dfca0b28
+size 11187022

models/subword_markov/ff_markov_ctx4_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 4,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "ff",
+  "unique_contexts": 457157,
+  "total_transitions": 31316721
+}

models/subword_ngram/ff_2gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:2ba2e247ba55a288240cffa86d2871409251cb2b7b5a9f318cb61805a008aff5
+size 104542

models/subword_ngram/ff_2gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 2,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "ff",
+  "unique_ngrams": 7815,
+  "total_ngrams": 31387941
+}

models/subword_ngram/ff_3gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:7fd7863a34b8af2bb1e5364f761ad777d72d2b9d439743986234f2d8bff28784
+size 688088

models/subword_ngram/ff_3gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 3,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "ff",
+  "unique_ngrams": 53321,
+  "total_ngrams": 31364201
+}

models/subword_ngram/ff_4gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:9fc73cba613175eee02112785abd63d7ce613cc175a6581959d627910b9aeff9
+size 3122888

models/subword_ngram/ff_4gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 4,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "ff",
+  "unique_ngrams": 265846,
+  "total_ngrams": 31340461
+}

models/subword_ngram/ff_5gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:81151347cddc968ed4dafb61b150e5364451a0ed159be7b158f4f3068948bf5d
+size 8543420

models/subword_ngram/ff_5gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 5,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "ff",
+  "unique_ngrams": 723015,
+  "total_ngrams": 31316721
+}

models/tokenizer/ff_tokenizer_16k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:323040dcb64623bfd5af464e0f7b0281f2b20a4c80f0fe0b82de53537bc615ee
+size 504872

models/tokenizer/ff_tokenizer_32k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:ceb9910a89d8b3b1e31f88420455c570089fb37d95e8f8856d8954d3cb533568
+size 773725

models/tokenizer/ff_tokenizer_64k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:d145fb4ca35752d3ecdc174ec96d0108ee077447d4d9415d9761b99faa003842
+size 1327639

models/tokenizer/ff_tokenizer_8k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:c08e4e164596d8a83964ef13187cf0d22d912c7f8b15e52a794e850d4253883f
+size 371858

models/vocabulary/ff_vocabulary.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:9192df7ef49137881f5c5ae5d947fe93722928bafc80ba3d7f60d071b20c2399
+size 1890069

models/vocabulary/ff_vocabulary_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+{
+  "language": "ff",
+  "vocabulary_size": 109082,
+  "variant": "full",
+  "statistics": {
+    "type_token_ratio": 0.046823607831613524,
+    "coverage": {
+      "top_100": 0.38784471342155136,
+      "top_1000": 0.660967811479145,
+      "top_5000": 0.81277638424332,
+      "top_10000": 0.8611159552971321
+    },
+    "hapax_count": 129613,
+    "hapax_ratio": 0.5430067659565554,
+    "total_documents": 23740
+  }
+}

models/word_markov/ff_markov_ctx1_word.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:a4d08ca6c99e62383d302f593089eaf60af252c263d4c5455620fb60fa9a8aba
+size 14379843