Upload all models and assets for fur (latest)

.gitattributes

@@ -33,3 +33,10 @@ saved_model/**/* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *.zip filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *.zst filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *tfevents* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/embedding_similarity.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/embedding_tsne_multilingual.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/performance_dashboard.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/position_encoding_comparison.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/tsne_sentences.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/tsne_words.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/zipf_law.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text

README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,770 @@
+---
+language: fur
+language_name: Friulian
+language_family: romance_galloitalic
+tags:
+  - wikilangs
+  - nlp
+  - tokenizer
+  - embeddings
+  - n-gram
+  - markov
+  - wikipedia
+  - feature-extraction
+  - sentence-similarity
+  - tokenization
+  - n-grams
+  - markov-chain
+  - text-mining
+  - fasttext
+  - babelvec
+  - vocabulous
+  - vocabulary
+  - monolingual
+  - family-romance_galloitalic
+license: mit
+library_name: wikilangs
+pipeline_tag: text-generation
+datasets:
+  - omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly
+dataset_info:
+  name: wikipedia-monthly
+  description: Monthly snapshots of Wikipedia articles across 300+ languages
+metrics:
+  - name: best_compression_ratio
+    type: compression
+    value: 4.179
+  - name: best_isotropy
+    type: isotropy
+    value: 0.8456
+  - name: vocabulary_size
+    type: vocab
+    value: 0
+generated: 2026-01-04
+---
+
+# Friulian - Wikilangs Models
+## Comprehensive Research Report & Full Ablation Study
+
+This repository contains NLP models trained and evaluated by Wikilangs, specifically on **Friulian** Wikipedia data.
+We analyze tokenizers, n-gram models, Markov chains, vocabulary statistics, and word embeddings.
+
+## 📋 Repository Contents
+
+### Models & Assets
+
+- Tokenizers (8k, 16k, 32k, 64k)
+- N-gram models (2, 3, 4, 5-gram)
+- Markov chains (context of 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5)
+- Subword N-gram and Markov chains
+- Embeddings in various sizes and dimensions (aligned and unaligned)
+- Language Vocabulary
+- Language Statistics
+
+![Performance Dashboard](visualizations/performance_dashboard.png)
+
+### Analysis and Evaluation
+
+- [1. Tokenizer Evaluation](#1-tokenizer-evaluation)
+- [2. N-gram Model Evaluation](#2-n-gram-model-evaluation)
+- [3. Markov Chain Evaluation](#3-markov-chain-evaluation)
+- [4. Vocabulary Analysis](#4-vocabulary-analysis)
+- [5. Word Embeddings Evaluation](#5-word-embeddings-evaluation)
+- [6. Morphological Analysis (Experimental)](#6--morphological-analysis-experimental)
+- [7. Summary & Recommendations](#7-summary--recommendations)
+- [Metrics Glossary](#appendix-metrics-glossary--interpretation-guide)
+- [Visualizations Index](#visualizations-index)
+
+---
+## 1. Tokenizer Evaluation
+
+![Tokenizer Compression](visualizations/tokenizer_compression.png)
+
+![Tokenizer Fertility](visualizations/tokenizer_fertility.png)
+
+![Tokenizer OOV](visualizations/tokenizer_oov.png)
+
+![Total Tokens](visualizations/tokenizer_total_tokens.png)
+
+### Results
+
+| Vocab Size | Compression | Avg Token Len | UNK Rate | Total Tokens |
+|------------|-------------|---------------|----------|--------------|
+| **8k** | 3.499x | 3.50 | 0.0442% | 298,836 |
+| **16k** | 3.763x | 3.77 | 0.0475% | 277,903 |
+| **32k** | 4.005x | 4.01 | 0.0506% | 261,078 |
+| **64k** | 4.179x 🏆 | 4.18 | 0.0528% | 250,188 |
+
+### Tokenization Examples
+
+Below are sample sentences tokenized with each vocabulary size:
+
+**Sample 1:** `Angelo Angeli (Tarcint al è stât un chimic furlan. Angeli, Angelo`
+
+| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
+|-------|--------|-------|
+| 8k | `▁angelo ▁ang eli ▁( tar cint ▁al ▁è ▁stât ▁un ... (+7 more)` | 17 |
+| 16k | `▁angelo ▁ang eli ▁( tar cint ▁al ▁è ▁stât ▁un ... (+7 more)` | 17 |
+| 32k | `▁angelo ▁angeli ▁( tarcint ▁al ▁è ▁stât ▁un ▁chimic ▁furlan ... (+4 more)` | 14 |
+| 64k | `▁angelo ▁angeli ▁( tarcint ▁al ▁è ▁stât ▁un ▁chimic ▁furlan ... (+4 more)` | 14 |
+
+**Sample 2:** `Futurama e jè une serie televisive merecane fate di Matt Groening, creadôr dai S...`
+
+| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
+|-------|--------|-------|
+| 8k | `▁fut ura ma ▁e ▁jè ▁une ▁serie ▁televis ive ▁merecane ... (+20 more)` | 30 |
+| 16k | `▁fut ura ma ▁e ▁jè ▁une ▁serie ▁televisive ▁merecane ▁fate ... (+16 more)` | 26 |
+| 32k | `▁fut ura ma ▁e ▁jè ▁une ▁serie ▁televisive ▁merecane ▁fate ... (+15 more)` | 25 |
+| 64k | `▁futurama ▁e ▁jè ▁une ▁serie ▁televisive ▁merecane ▁fate ▁di ▁matt ... (+10 more)` | 20 |
+
+**Sample 3:** `La gjenerazion cidine (Silent Generation par inglês) e je la coort demografiche ...`
+
+| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
+|-------|--------|-------|
+| 8k | `▁la ▁gjenerazion ▁cid ine ▁( s il ent ▁gener ation ... (+16 more)` | 26 |
+| 16k | `▁la ▁gjenerazion ▁cid ine ▁( s il ent ▁gener ation ... (+15 more)` | 25 |
+| 32k | `▁la ▁gjenerazion ▁cidine ▁( sil ent ▁generation ▁par ▁inglês ) ... (+12 more)` | 22 |
+| 64k | `▁la ▁gjenerazion ▁cidine ▁( silent ▁generation ▁par ▁inglês ) ▁e ... (+11 more)` | 21 |
+
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Compression:** 64k achieves 4.179x compression
+- **Lowest UNK Rate:** 8k with 0.0442% unknown tokens
+- **Trade-off:** Larger vocabularies improve compression but increase model size
+- **Recommendation:** 32k vocabulary provides optimal balance for production use
+
+---
+## 2. N-gram Model Evaluation
+
+![N-gram Perplexity](visualizations/ngram_perplexity.png)
+
+![N-gram Unique](visualizations/ngram_unique.png)
+
+![N-gram Coverage](visualizations/ngram_coverage.png)
+
+### Results
+
+| N-gram | Variant | Perplexity | Entropy | Unique N-grams | Top-100 Coverage | Top-1000 Coverage |
+|--------|---------|------------|---------|----------------|------------------|-------------------|
+| **2-gram** | Word | 6,387 | 12.64 | 19,666 | 20.3% | 46.3% |
+| **2-gram** | Subword | 248 🏆 | 7.96 | 2,671 | 70.2% | 99.2% |
+| **3-gram** | Word | 8,833 | 13.11 | 24,038 | 19.0% | 41.2% |
+| **3-gram** | Subword | 1,960 | 10.94 | 19,755 | 29.1% | 74.5% |
+| **4-gram** | Word | 13,956 | 13.77 | 38,236 | 17.7% | 36.5% |
+| **4-gram** | Subword | 10,511 | 13.36 | 89,752 | 14.0% | 41.5% |
+| **5-gram** | Word | 8,136 | 12.99 | 25,386 | 22.1% | 44.1% |
+| **5-gram** | Subword | 34,761 | 15.09 | 204,100 | 7.7% | 25.8% |
+
+### Top 5 N-grams by Size
+
+**2-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `al è` | 7,101 |
+| 2 | `e je` | 3,936 |
+| 3 | `che al` | 2,795 |
+| 4 | `d c` | 2,492 |
+| 5 | `a son` | 2,477 |
+
+**3-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `p d c` | 2,382 |
+| 2 | `al è un` | 2,096 |
+| 3 | `c p d` | 1,011 |
+| 4 | `d c p` | 1,011 |
+| 5 | `e je la` | 898 |
+
+**4-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `c p d c` | 1,011 |
+| 2 | `d c p d` | 1,011 |
+| 3 | `p d c p` | 1,011 |
+| 4 | `al è un comun` | 793 |
+| 5 | `friûl vie pal mont` | 658 |
+
+**5-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `p d c p d` | 1,011 |
+| 2 | `d c p d c` | 1,011 |
+| 3 | `c p d c p` | 1,002 |
+| 4 | `in friûl vie pal mont` | 653 |
+| 5 | `cjale ancje storie an par` | 623 |
+
+**2-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `e _` | 162,437 |
+| 2 | `_ d` | 109,050 |
+| 3 | `i _` | 91,782 |
+| 4 | `l _` | 85,238 |
+| 5 | `_ c` | 77,432 |
+
+**3-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `a l _` | 50,711 |
+| 2 | `_ d i` | 47,425 |
+| 3 | `d i _` | 41,307 |
+| 4 | `_ e _` | 27,541 |
+| 5 | `_ d a` | 27,491 |
+
+**4-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `_ d i _` | 38,921 |
+| 2 | `_ a l _` | 22,205 |
+| 3 | `_ d a l` | 18,305 |
+| 4 | `d a l _` | 18,054 |
+| 5 | `c h e _` | 17,262 |
+
+**5-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `_ d a l _` | 17,925 |
+| 2 | `_ c h e _` | 11,800 |
+| 3 | `e _ d i _` | 9,488 |
+| 4 | `_ p a r _` | 7,670 |
+| 5 | `a z i o n` | 7,163 |
+
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Perplexity:** 2-gram (subword) with 248
+- **Entropy Trend:** Decreases with larger n-grams (more predictable)
+- **Coverage:** Top-1000 patterns cover ~26% of corpus
+- **Recommendation:** 4-gram or 5-gram for best predictive performance
+
+---
+## 3. Markov Chain Evaluation
+
+![Markov Entropy](visualizations/markov_entropy.png)
+
+![Markov Contexts](visualizations/markov_contexts.png)
+
+![Markov Branching](visualizations/markov_branching.png)
+
+### Results
+
+| Context | Variant | Avg Entropy | Perplexity | Branching Factor | Unique Contexts | Predictability |
+|---------|---------|-------------|------------|------------------|-----------------|----------------|
+| **1** | Word | 0.8172 | 1.762 | 4.95 | 72,772 | 18.3% |
+| **1** | Subword | 1.1868 | 2.277 | 8.98 | 739 | 0.0% |
+| **2** | Word | 0.2892 | 1.222 | 1.68 | 358,823 | 71.1% |
+| **2** | Subword | 0.9716 | 1.961 | 5.88 | 6,634 | 2.8% |
+| **3** | Word | 0.0992 | 1.071 | 1.17 | 599,633 | 90.1% |
+| **3** | Subword | 0.8300 | 1.778 | 3.99 | 38,974 | 17.0% |
+| **4** | Word | 0.0329 🏆 | 1.023 | 1.05 | 698,598 | 96.7% |
+| **4** | Subword | 0.6457 | 1.564 | 2.69 | 155,477 | 35.4% |
+
+### Generated Text Samples (Word-based)
+
+Below are text samples generated from each word-based Markov chain model:
+
+**Context Size 1:**
+
+1. `di març nassût intal vivaldi al continuà il plui famôs il cjampanîl di ferruccio valcareggi dilunc`
+2. `e al è un an par descrivi in lui intal bahrain a cjaval di lôr al`
+3. `al deficit dal stelon l an par latin si c p d c 502 p d`
+
+**Context Size 2:**
+
+1. `al è iessut il 28 chês di chei timps a vevin sielzût in riferiment ae lenghe te`
+2. `e je la ilustrazion de vedue che e je l uniche eruzion tal cjamp des circoscrizions che`
+3. `che al conte 40 670 puescj 31 533 omologâts dal la glesie parochiâl di foresto sparso dedicade`
+
+**Context Size 3:**
+
+1. `p d c 459 p d c 983 p d c 818 p d c al vûl dî`
+2. `al è un an dal secul xvii acjadiments nassûts muarts cjale ancje storie an par an dal friûl`
+3. `c p d c 680 p d c 327 p d c fint al p d c 73`
+
+**Context Size 4:**
+
+1. `p d c p d c p d c p d c p d c p d c p`
+2. `d c p d c p d c p d c p d c p d c p d`
+3. `c p d c p d c p d c p d c p d c p d c`
+
+
+### Generated Text Samples (Subword-based)
+
+Below are text samples generated from each subword-based Markov chain model:
+
+**Context Size 1:**
+
+1. `_rda_3871570prtâ`
+2. `icjoba_ili_a_pal`
+3. `entisal_asi_ant_`
+
+**Context Size 2:**
+
+1. `e_e_abitadôr_a_em`
+2. `_diulnunellonobum`
+3. `i_riodellan_de_mi`
+
+**Context Size 3:**
+
+1. `al_riveligjôs_pera`
+2. `_di_un_si_day_28_d`
+3. `di_la_maxister_(†_`
+
+**Context Size 4:**
+
+1. `_di_2-3_fin_a_un_fu`
+2. `_al_à_1.353)_tris_c`
+3. `_dal_mâr_dai_piçule`
+
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Predictability:** Context-4 (word) with 96.7% predictability
+- **Branching Factor:** Decreases with context size (more deterministic)
+- **Memory Trade-off:** Larger contexts require more storage (155,477 contexts)
+- **Recommendation:** Context-3 or Context-4 for text generation
+
+---
+## 4. Vocabulary Analysis
+
+![Zipf's Law](visualizations/zipf_law.png)
+
+![Top Words](visualizations/top20_words.png)
+
+![Coverage Curve](visualizations/vocab_coverage.png)
+
+### Statistics
+
+| Metric | Value |
+|--------|-------|
+| Vocabulary Size | 32,145 |
+| Total Tokens | 790,046 |
+| Mean Frequency | 24.58 |
+| Median Frequency | 4 |
+| Frequency Std Dev | 397.72 |
+
+### Most Common Words
+
+| Rank | Word | Frequency |
+|------|------|-----------|
+| 1 | di | 39,085 |
+| 2 | e | 28,112 |
+| 3 | al | 22,659 |
+| 4 | a | 19,048 |
+| 5 | dal | 18,049 |
+| 6 | la | 17,389 |
+| 7 | il | 14,910 |
+| 8 | de | 12,230 |
+| 9 | che | 12,124 |
+| 10 | in | 9,877 |
+
+### Least Common Words (from vocabulary)
+
+| Rank | Word | Frequency |
+|------|------|-----------|
+| 1 | sorunsuz | 2 |
+| 2 | honorem | 2 |
+| 3 | mariie | 2 |
+| 4 | zeni | 2 |
+| 5 | prestato | 2 |
+| 6 | colomps | 2 |
+| 7 | mariotti | 2 |
+| 8 | acoustic | 2 |
+| 9 | hayreddin | 2 |
+| 10 | mitilen | 2 |
+
+### Zipf's Law Analysis
+
+| Metric | Value |
+|--------|-------|
+| Zipf Coefficient | 1.0527 |
+| R² (Goodness of Fit) | 0.998570 |
+| Adherence Quality | **excellent** |
+
+### Coverage Analysis
+
+| Top N Words | Coverage |
+|-------------|----------|
+| Top 100 | 47.2% |
+| Top 1,000 | 70.1% |
+| Top 5,000 | 85.4% |
+| Top 10,000 | 91.3% |
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Zipf Compliance:** R²=0.9986 indicates excellent adherence to Zipf's law
+- **High Frequency Dominance:** Top 100 words cover 47.2% of corpus
+- **Long Tail:** 22,145 words needed for remaining 8.7% coverage
+
+---
+## 5. Word Embeddings Evaluation
+
+![Embedding Isotropy](visualizations/embedding_isotropy.png)
+
+![Similarity Matrix](visualizations/embedding_similarity.png)
+
+![t-SNE Words](visualizations/tsne_words.png)
+
+![t-SNE Sentences](visualizations/tsne_sentences.png)
+
+
+### 5.1 Cross-Lingual Alignment
+
+![Alignment Quality](visualizations/embedding_alignment_quality.png)
+
+![Multilingual t-SNE](visualizations/embedding_tsne_multilingual.png)
+
+
+### 5.2 Model Comparison
+
+| Model | Dimension | Isotropy | Semantic Density | Alignment R@1 | Alignment R@10 |
+|-------|-----------|----------|------------------|---------------|----------------|
+| **mono_32d** | 32 | 0.8456 🏆 | 0.3453 | N/A | N/A |
+| **mono_64d** | 64 | 0.7362 | 0.2912 | N/A | N/A |
+| **mono_128d** | 128 | 0.3656 | 0.2659 | N/A | N/A |
+| **aligned_32d** | 32 | 0.8456 | 0.3331 | 0.0580 | 0.2960 |
+| **aligned_64d** | 64 | 0.7362 | 0.2849 | 0.1000 | 0.3420 |
+| **aligned_128d** | 128 | 0.3656 | 0.2575 | 0.1500 | 0.4140 |
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Isotropy:** mono_32d with 0.8456 (more uniform distribution)
+- **Semantic Density:** Average pairwise similarity of 0.2963. Lower values indicate better semantic separation.
+- **Alignment Quality:** Aligned models achieve up to 15.0% R@1 in cross-lingual retrieval.
+- **Recommendation:** 128d aligned for best cross-lingual performance
+
+---
+## 6.  Morphological Analysis (Experimental)
+
+This section presents an automated morphological analysis derived from the statistical divergence between word-level and subword-level models. By analyzing where subword predictability spikes and where word-level coverage fails, we can infer linguistic structures without supervised data.
+
+### 6.1 Productivity & Complexity
+
+| Metric | Value | Interpretation | Recommendation |
+|--------|-------|----------------|----------------|
+| Productivity Index | **5.000** | High morphological productivity | Reliable analysis |
+| Idiomaticity Gap | **0.707** | High formulaic/idiomatic content | - |
+
+### 6.2 Affix Inventory (Productive Units)
+
+These are the most productive prefixes and suffixes identified by sampling the vocabulary for global substitutability patterns. A unit is considered an affix if stripping it leaves a valid stem that appears in other contexts.
+
+#### Productive Prefixes
+| Prefix | Examples |
+|--------|----------|
+| `-co` | comme, concentrâts, conventu |
+| `-pr` | programadis, protagoniscj, prestazions |
+| `-in` | insets, inventôrs, interpretazions |
+
+#### Productive Suffixes
+| Suffix | Examples |
+|--------|----------|
+| `-s` | murçalis, programadis, carateristichis |
+| `-e` | que, croniche, vicenze |
+| `-is` | murçalis, programadis, carateristichis |
+| `-ts` | insets, falâts, possidents |
+| `-on` | perfezion, chiampon, ambientazion |
+| `-ât` | bonât, popolaritât, staticitât |
+| `-de` | alimentade, liende, einöde |
+| `-in` | rabin, montafin, bandonin |
+
+### 6.3 Bound Stems (Lexical Roots)
+
+Bound stems are high-frequency subword units that are semantically cohesive but rarely appear as standalone words. These often correspond to the 'core' of a word that requires inflection or derivation to be valid.
+
+| Stem | Cohesion | Substitutability | Examples |
+|------|----------|------------------|----------|
+| `azio` | 2.07x | 55 contexts | lazio, azion, spazio |
+| `uart` | 1.84x | 71 contexts | fuart, puart, muart |
+| `razi` | 2.17x | 30 contexts | razis, orazi, grazie |
+| `iche` | 1.93x | 44 contexts | piche, laiche, criche |
+| `entr` | 1.81x | 43 contexts | centr, entre, entri |
+| `lian` | 1.92x | 34 contexts | zelian, zulian, talian |
+| `itât` | 1.95x | 30 contexts | citât, mitât, zitât |
+| `imen` | 1.95x | 27 contexts | imens, timent, ciment |
+| `ions` | 2.24x | 16 contexts | lions, zions, grions |
+| `omun` | 2.07x | 18 contexts | comun, comune, comuni |
+| `isti` | 1.48x | 52 contexts | esisti, listis, istint |
+| `ntri` | 1.85x | 20 contexts | entri, cintri, contri |
+
+### 6.4 Affix Compatibility (Co-occurrence)
+
+This table shows which prefixes and suffixes most frequently co-occur on the same stems, revealing the 'stacking' rules of the language's morphology.
+
+| Prefix | Suffix | Frequency | Examples |
+|--------|--------|-----------|----------|
+| `-co` | `-s` | 88 words | comunâls, comics |
+| `-co` | `-e` | 64 words | couture, completade |
+| `-pr` | `-e` | 50 words | predicjave, protagoniste |
+| `-pr` | `-s` | 48 words | principinonpais, provocatoris |
+| `-in` | `-s` | 46 words | invetivis, industriis |
+| `-in` | `-e` | 38 words | invistidure, incirche |
+| `-co` | `-is` | 34 words | contraris, convicinis |
+| `-co` | `-on` | 31 words | concession, cosson |
+| `-co` | `-in` | 24 words | costin, condividevin |
+| `-co` | `-nt` | 21 words | costituint, corispondent |
+
+### 6.5 Recursive Morpheme Segmentation
+
+Using **Recursive Hierarchical Substitutability**, we decompose complex words into their constituent morphemes. This approach handles nested affixes (e.g., `prefix-prefix-root-suffix`).
+
+| Word | Suggested Split | Confidence | Stem |
+|------|-----------------|------------|------|
+| studentis | **`stude-nt-is`** | 6.0 | `stude` |
+| costantin | **`co-stant-in`** | 6.0 | `stant` |
+| incontaminât | **`in-co-ntam-in-ât`** | 6.0 | `ntam` |
+| friulinis | **`friul-in-is`** | 6.0 | `friul` |
+| indreçâts | **`in-dreçâ-ts`** | 6.0 | `dreçâ` |
+| filipinis | **`filip-in-is`** | 6.0 | `filip` |
+| grandonis | **`grand-on-is`** | 6.0 | `grand` |
+| venetopontinis | **`venetopo-nt-in-is`** | 4.5 | `venetopo` |
+| bandonâts | **`bandonâ-ts`** | 4.5 | `bandonâ` |
+| favorevulis | **`favorevul-is`** | 4.5 | `favorevul` |
+| indagjinis | **`in-dagj-in-is`** | 4.5 | `dagj` |
+| segretariât | **`segretari-ât`** | 4.5 | `segretari` |
+| designâts | **`designâ-ts`** | 4.5 | `designâ` |
+| associâts | **`associâ-ts`** | 4.5 | `associâ` |
+| cuviertis | **`cuviert-is`** | 4.5 | `cuviert` |
+
+### 6.6 Linguistic Interpretation
+
+> **Automated Insight:**
+The language Friulian shows high morphological productivity. The subword models are significantly more efficient than word models, suggesting a rich system of affixation or compounding.
+
+> **Note on Idiomaticity:** The high Idiomaticity Gap suggests a large number of frequent multi-word expressions or formulaic sequences that are statistically distinct from their component parts.
+
+---
+## 7. Summary & Recommendations
+
+![Performance Dashboard](visualizations/performance_dashboard.png)
+
+### Production Recommendations
+
+| Component | Recommended | Rationale |
+|-----------|-------------|-----------|
+| Tokenizer | **64k BPE** | Best compression (4.18x) |
+| N-gram | **2-gram** | Lowest perplexity (248) |
+| Markov | **Context-4** | Highest predictability (96.7%) |
+| Embeddings | **100d** | Balanced semantic capture and isotropy |
+
+
+---
+## Appendix: Metrics Glossary & Interpretation Guide
+
+This section provides definitions, intuitions, and guidance for interpreting the metrics used throughout this report.
+
+### Tokenizer Metrics
+
+**Compression Ratio**
+> *Definition:* The ratio of characters to tokens (chars/token). Measures how efficiently the tokenizer represents text.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Higher compression means fewer tokens needed to represent the same text, reducing sequence lengths for downstream models. A 3x compression means ~3 characters per token on average.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Higher is generally better for efficiency, but extremely high compression may indicate overly aggressive merging that loses morphological information.
+
+**Average Token Length (Fertility)**
+> *Definition:* Mean number of characters per token produced by the tokenizer.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Reflects the granularity of tokenization. Longer tokens capture more context but may struggle with rare words; shorter tokens are more flexible but increase sequence length.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Balance between 2-5 characters for most languages. Arabic/morphologically-rich languages may benefit from slightly longer tokens.
+
+**Unknown Token Rate (OOV Rate)**
+> *Definition:* Percentage of tokens that map to the unknown/UNK token, indicating words the tokenizer cannot represent.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Lower OOV means better vocabulary coverage. High OOV indicates the tokenizer encounters many unseen character sequences.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Below 1% is excellent; below 5% is acceptable. BPE tokenizers typically achieve very low OOV due to subword fallback.
+
+### N-gram Model Metrics
+
+**Perplexity**
+> *Definition:* Measures how "surprised" the model is by test data. Mathematically: 2^(cross-entropy). Lower values indicate better prediction.
+>
+> *Intuition:* If perplexity is 100, the model is as uncertain as if choosing uniformly among 100 options at each step. A perplexity of 10 means effectively choosing among 10 equally likely options.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Lower is better. Perplexity decreases with larger n-grams (more context). Values vary widely by language and corpus size.
+
+**Entropy**
+> *Definition:* Average information content (in bits) needed to encode the next token given the context. Related to perplexity: perplexity = 2^entropy.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High entropy means high uncertainty/randomness; low entropy means predictable patterns. Natural language typically has entropy between 1-4 bits per character.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Lower entropy indicates more predictable text patterns. Entropy should decrease as n-gram size increases.
+
+**Coverage (Top-K)**
+> *Definition:* Percentage of corpus occurrences explained by the top K most frequent n-grams.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High coverage with few patterns indicates repetitive/formulaic text; low coverage suggests diverse vocabulary usage.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Depends on use case. For language modeling, moderate coverage (40-60% with top-1000) is typical for natural text.
+
+### Markov Chain Metrics
+
+**Average Entropy**
+> *Definition:* Mean entropy across all contexts, measuring average uncertainty in next-word prediction.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Lower entropy means the model is more confident about what comes next. Context-1 has high entropy (many possible next words); Context-4 has low entropy (few likely continuations).
+>
+> *What to seek:* Decreasing entropy with larger context sizes. Very low entropy (<0.1) indicates highly deterministic transitions.
+
+**Branching Factor**
+> *Definition:* Average number of unique next tokens observed for each context.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High branching = many possible continuations (flexible but uncertain); low branching = few options (predictable but potentially repetitive).
+>
+> *What to seek:* Branching factor should decrease with context size. Values near 1.0 indicate nearly deterministic chains.
+
+**Predictability**
+> *Definition:* Derived metric: (1 - normalized_entropy) × 100%. Indicates how deterministic the model's predictions are.
+>
+> *Intuition:* 100% predictability means the next word is always certain; 0% means completely random. Real text falls between these extremes.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Higher predictability for text generation quality, but too high (>98%) may produce repetitive output.
+
+### Vocabulary & Zipf's Law Metrics
+
+**Zipf's Coefficient**
+> *Definition:* The slope of the log-log plot of word frequency vs. rank. Zipf's law predicts this should be approximately -1.
+>
+> *Intuition:* A coefficient near -1 indicates the corpus follows natural language patterns where a few words are very common and most words are rare.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Values between -0.8 and -1.2 indicate healthy natural language distribution. Deviations may suggest domain-specific or artificial text.
+
+**R² (Coefficient of Determination)**
+> *Definition:* Measures how well the linear fit explains the frequency-rank relationship. Ranges from 0 to 1.
+>
+> *Intuition:* R² near 1.0 means the data closely follows Zipf's law; lower values indicate deviation from expected word frequency patterns.
+>
+> *What to seek:* R² > 0.95 is excellent; > 0.99 indicates near-perfect Zipf adherence typical of large natural corpora.
+
+**Vocabulary Coverage**
+> *Definition:* Cumulative percentage of corpus tokens accounted for by the top N words.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Shows how concentrated word usage is. If top-100 words cover 50% of text, the corpus relies heavily on common words.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Top-100 covering 30-50% is typical. Higher coverage indicates more repetitive text; lower suggests richer vocabulary.
+
+### Word Embedding Metrics
+
+**Isotropy**
+> *Definition:* Measures how uniformly distributed vectors are in the embedding space. Computed as the ratio of minimum to maximum singular values.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High isotropy (near 1.0) means vectors spread evenly in all directions; low isotropy means vectors cluster in certain directions, reducing expressiveness.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Higher isotropy generally indicates better-quality embeddings. Values > 0.1 are reasonable; > 0.3 is good. Lower-dimensional embeddings tend to have higher isotropy.
+
+**Average Norm**
+> *Definition:* Mean magnitude (L2 norm) of word vectors in the embedding space.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Indicates the typical "length" of vectors. Consistent norms suggest stable training; high variance may indicate some words are undertrained.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Relatively consistent norms across models. The absolute value matters less than consistency (low std deviation).
+
+**Cosine Similarity**
+> *Definition:* Measures angular similarity between vectors, ranging from -1 (opposite) to 1 (identical direction).
+>
+> *Intuition:* Words with similar meanings should have high cosine similarity. This is the standard metric for semantic relatedness in embeddings.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Semantically related words should score > 0.5; unrelated words should be near 0. Synonyms often score > 0.7.
+
+**t-SNE Visualization**
+> *Definition:* t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding - a dimensionality reduction technique that preserves local structure for visualization.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Clusters in t-SNE plots indicate groups of semantically related words. Spread indicates vocabulary diversity; tight clusters suggest semantic coherence.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Meaningful clusters (e.g., numbers together, verbs together). Avoid over-interpreting distances - t-SNE preserves local, not global, structure.
+
+### General Interpretation Guidelines
+
+1. **Compare within model families:** Metrics are most meaningful when comparing models of the same type (e.g., 8k vs 64k tokenizer).
+2. **Consider trade-offs:** Better performance on one metric often comes at the cost of another (e.g., compression vs. OOV rate).
+3. **Context matters:** Optimal values depend on downstream tasks. Text generation may prioritize different metrics than classification.
+4. **Corpus influence:** All metrics are influenced by corpus characteristics. Wikipedia text differs from social media or literature.
+5. **Language-specific patterns:** Morphologically rich languages (like Arabic) may show different optimal ranges than analytic languages.
+
+
+### Visualizations Index
+
+| Visualization | Description |
+|---------------|-------------|
+| Tokenizer Compression | Compression ratios by vocabulary size |
+| Tokenizer Fertility | Average token length by vocabulary |
+| Tokenizer OOV | Unknown token rates |
+| Tokenizer Total Tokens | Total tokens by vocabulary |
+| N-gram Perplexity | Perplexity by n-gram size |
+| N-gram Entropy | Entropy by n-gram size |
+| N-gram Coverage | Top pattern coverage |
+| N-gram Unique | Unique n-gram counts |
+| Markov Entropy | Entropy by context size |
+| Markov Branching | Branching factor by context |
+| Markov Contexts | Unique context counts |
+| Zipf's Law | Frequency-rank distribution with fit |
+| Vocab Frequency | Word frequency distribution |
+| Top 20 Words | Most frequent words |
+| Vocab Coverage | Cumulative coverage curve |
+| Embedding Isotropy | Vector space uniformity |
+| Embedding Norms | Vector magnitude distribution |
+| Embedding Similarity | Word similarity heatmap |
+| Nearest Neighbors | Similar words for key terms |
+| t-SNE Words | 2D word embedding visualization |
+| t-SNE Sentences | 2D sentence embedding visualization |
+| Position Encoding | Encoding method comparison |
+| Model Sizes | Storage requirements |
+| Performance Dashboard | Comprehensive performance overview |
+
+---
+## About This Project
+
+### Data Source
+
+Models trained on [wikipedia-monthly](https://huggingface.co/datasets/omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly) - a monthly snapshot of Wikipedia articles across 300+ languages.
+
+### Project
+
+A project by **[Wikilangs](https://wikilangs.org)** - Open-source NLP models for every Wikipedia language.
+
+### Maintainer
+
+[Omar Kamali](https://omarkamali.com) - [Omneity Labs](https://omneitylabs.com)
+
+### Citation
+
+If you use these models in your research, please cite:
+
+```bibtex
+@misc{wikilangs2025,
+  author = {Kamali, Omar},
+  title = {Wikilangs: Open NLP Models for Wikipedia Languages},
+  year = {2025},
+  doi = {10.5281/zenodo.18073153},
+  publisher = {Zenodo},
+  url = {https://huggingface.co/wikilangs}
+  institution = {Omneity Labs}
+}
+```
+
+### License
+
+MIT License - Free for academic and commercial use.
+
+### Links
+
+- 🌐 Website: [wikilangs.org](https://wikilangs.org)
+- 🤗 Models: [huggingface.co/wikilangs](https://huggingface.co/wikilangs)
+- 📊 Data: [wikipedia-monthly](https://huggingface.co/datasets/omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly)
+- 👤 Author: [Omar Kamali](https://huggingface.co/omarkamali)
+- 🤝 Sponsor: [Featherless AI](https://featherless.ai)
+---
+*Generated by Wikilangs Models Pipeline*
+
+*Report Date: 2026-01-04 14:49:50*

models/embeddings/aligned/fur_128d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:3bd754070f656cf0568ced45f83985bb70edbf290d1305aad3a3f55f12dedf8d
+size 1038779862

models/embeddings/aligned/fur_128d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "fur", "dim": 128, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": true}

models/embeddings/aligned/fur_128d.projection.npy

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:449ab221e6732830837170e2741b43bbfa8731d291539ef43234dd8d063e51e9
+size 65664

models/embeddings/aligned/fur_128d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+{
+  "language": "fur",
+  "dimension": 128,
+  "version": "aligned",
+  "hub_language": "en",
+  "seed_vocab_size": 4364,
+  "vocab_size": 14201
+}

models/embeddings/aligned/fur_32d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:10cf51a0616f06d35ffd476a47a3bd25236edd530453f49cfa87e1aa40285671
+size 259873494

models/embeddings/aligned/fur_32d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "fur", "dim": 32, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": true}

models/embeddings/aligned/fur_32d.projection.npy

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:210e88611abfb93769235899af8416285e87dace4eaa483c6bb6a966e3c43d46
+size 4224

models/embeddings/aligned/fur_32d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+{
+  "language": "fur",
+  "dimension": 32,
+  "version": "aligned",
+  "hub_language": "en",
+  "seed_vocab_size": 4364,
+  "vocab_size": 14201
+}

models/embeddings/aligned/fur_64d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:4210022c8ed44f164c3ddf53a2ee8eaebd7926506f2946b208fd5c0fdc162854
+size 519508950

models/embeddings/aligned/fur_64d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "fur", "dim": 64, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": true}

models/embeddings/aligned/fur_64d.projection.npy

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:7c7e73c2b6b265455b0afd054208785b8fade8cd3a1ca688a2fc709dbbe3a579
+size 16512

models/embeddings/aligned/fur_64d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+{
+  "language": "fur",
+  "dimension": 64,
+  "version": "aligned",
+  "hub_language": "en",
+  "seed_vocab_size": 4364,
+  "vocab_size": 14201
+}

models/embeddings/monolingual/fur_128d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:3bd754070f656cf0568ced45f83985bb70edbf290d1305aad3a3f55f12dedf8d
+size 1038779862

models/embeddings/monolingual/fur_128d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "fur", "dim": 128, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": false}

models/embeddings/monolingual/fur_128d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+{
+  "language": "fur",
+  "dimension": 128,
+  "version": "monolingual",
+  "training_params": {
+    "algorithm": "skipgram",
+    "min_count": 5,
+    "window": 5,
+    "negative": 5,
+    "epochs": 5,
+    "encoding_method": "rope",
+    "dim": 128
+  },
+  "vocab_size": 14201
+}

models/embeddings/monolingual/fur_32d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:10cf51a0616f06d35ffd476a47a3bd25236edd530453f49cfa87e1aa40285671
+size 259873494

models/embeddings/monolingual/fur_32d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "fur", "dim": 32, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": false}

models/embeddings/monolingual/fur_32d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+{
+  "language": "fur",
+  "dimension": 32,
+  "version": "monolingual",
+  "training_params": {
+    "algorithm": "skipgram",
+    "min_count": 5,
+    "window": 5,
+    "negative": 5,
+    "epochs": 5,
+    "encoding_method": "rope",
+    "dim": 32
+  },
+  "vocab_size": 14201
+}

models/embeddings/monolingual/fur_64d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:4210022c8ed44f164c3ddf53a2ee8eaebd7926506f2946b208fd5c0fdc162854
+size 519508950

models/embeddings/monolingual/fur_64d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "fur", "dim": 64, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": false}

models/embeddings/monolingual/fur_64d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+{
+  "language": "fur",
+  "dimension": 64,
+  "version": "monolingual",
+  "training_params": {
+    "algorithm": "skipgram",
+    "min_count": 5,
+    "window": 5,
+    "negative": 5,
+    "epochs": 5,
+    "encoding_method": "rope",
+    "dim": 64
+  },
+  "vocab_size": 14201
+}

models/subword_markov/fur_markov_ctx1_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:6b242fa6ea9c11140fe9c87acf2ce9ec766b13f032edad68a77f0ee3187e0756
+size 53730

models/subword_markov/fur_markov_ctx1_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 1,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "fur",
+  "unique_contexts": 739,
+  "total_transitions": 4661841
+}

models/subword_markov/fur_markov_ctx2_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:64d86b022fbd7302cad8acac5c85a2d8090ea358f974ffbe9899246043480223
+size 310979

models/subword_markov/fur_markov_ctx2_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 2,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "fur",
+  "unique_contexts": 6634,
+  "total_transitions": 4656853
+}

models/subword_markov/fur_markov_ctx3_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:5184cd335af7a6bdaa5796bbfd953405700df038c2fc83d2150526e39b7b79eb
+size 1167229

models/subword_markov/fur_markov_ctx3_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 3,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "fur",
+  "unique_contexts": 38974,
+  "total_transitions": 4651865
+}

models/subword_markov/fur_markov_ctx4_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:06e62411296d48d06c36192fe6a162b0a4fd1321f35d3bb2dc6b0fe2bcf5ccad
+size 3232561

models/subword_markov/fur_markov_ctx4_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 4,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "fur",
+  "unique_contexts": 155477,
+  "total_transitions": 4646877
+}

models/subword_ngram/fur_2gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:85282934533987b7a2b762f8b6b37f1743a149ef77b47a2aba1642661cfd7f3f
+size 36065

models/subword_ngram/fur_2gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 2,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "fur",
+  "unique_ngrams": 2671,
+  "total_ngrams": 4661841
+}

models/subword_ngram/fur_3gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:30242096d15f610f47b5c652f54c4133a9950e6e97f6a71a1adf3e7cc0000404
+size 240858

models/subword_ngram/fur_3gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 3,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "fur",
+  "unique_ngrams": 19755,
+  "total_ngrams": 4656853
+}

models/subword_ngram/fur_4gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:d8fca177552757bc4d970ec7b96cd9bdff88dd2f785fd74b5e20f4cd593b11c9
+size 1031007

models/subword_ngram/fur_4gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 4,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "fur",
+  "unique_ngrams": 89752,
+  "total_ngrams": 4651865
+}

models/subword_ngram/fur_5gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:eadf83e51313a7159a33666d4dbe11b21a26b1245c5ab39583f565b81a8ea037
+size 2352553

models/subword_ngram/fur_5gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 5,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "fur",
+  "unique_ngrams": 204100,
+  "total_ngrams": 4646877
+}

models/tokenizer/fur_tokenizer_16k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:c82f34540c76c37f8b6247dea287d8e08f014bce25a9a96571a6de5b5b1db095
+size 510064

models/tokenizer/fur_tokenizer_32k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:238fdf75dd5b7ca74f10d98df3f2f39305f10c8f7041ebe600bd274e8239f377
+size 783899

models/tokenizer/fur_tokenizer_64k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:05439ffde3e261a830121c66e05e83f6aa7480ce7db0e5f755c1098e6d2329a9
+size 1375208

models/tokenizer/fur_tokenizer_8k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:1da2cc48b4fa4a90e847255351226a6eb7c550c1b592b5fe6e3ff82226cdd874
+size 375086

models/vocabulary/fur_vocabulary.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:10031283454c4a768b3758ecb0cfd651cc2ac00ff322fa5caa5fc3c4f7037e1c
+size 537539

models/vocabulary/fur_vocabulary_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+{
+  "language": "fur",
+  "vocabulary_size": 32145,
+  "variant": "full",
+  "statistics": {
+    "type_token_ratio": 0.08781032642120985,
+    "coverage": {
+      "top_100": 0.44923386519252967,
+      "top_1000": 0.666736473938418,
+      "top_5000": 0.8116070235743971,
+      "top_10000": 0.8681870209024636
+    },
+    "hapax_count": 40813,
+    "hapax_ratio": 0.5594040406809397,
+    "total_documents": 4988
+  }
+}

models/word_markov/fur_markov_ctx1_word.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:5a4de3940f026199bd86c87cbc9e98be07b41c3ccff8273faa96954e75bd1c5a
+size 2693096