Upload all models and assets for gur (latest)

.gitattributes

@@ -33,3 +33,10 @@ saved_model/**/* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *.zip filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *.zst filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *tfevents* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/embedding_similarity.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/embedding_tsne_multilingual.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/performance_dashboard.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/position_encoding_comparison.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/tsne_sentences.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/tsne_words.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/zipf_law.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text

README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,729 @@
+---
+language: gur
+language_name: Frafra
+language_family: atlantic_gur
+tags:
+  - wikilangs
+  - nlp
+  - tokenizer
+  - embeddings
+  - n-gram
+  - markov
+  - wikipedia
+  - feature-extraction
+  - sentence-similarity
+  - tokenization
+  - n-grams
+  - markov-chain
+  - text-mining
+  - fasttext
+  - babelvec
+  - vocabulous
+  - vocabulary
+  - monolingual
+  - family-atlantic_gur
+license: mit
+library_name: wikilangs
+pipeline_tag: text-generation
+datasets:
+  - omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly
+dataset_info:
+  name: wikipedia-monthly
+  description: Monthly snapshots of Wikipedia articles across 300+ languages
+metrics:
+  - name: best_compression_ratio
+    type: compression
+    value: 4.001
+  - name: best_isotropy
+    type: isotropy
+    value: 0.7704
+  - name: vocabulary_size
+    type: vocab
+    value: 0
+generated: 2026-01-10
+---
+
+# Frafra - Wikilangs Models
+## Comprehensive Research Report & Full Ablation Study
+
+This repository contains NLP models trained and evaluated by Wikilangs, specifically on **Frafra** Wikipedia data.
+We analyze tokenizers, n-gram models, Markov chains, vocabulary statistics, and word embeddings.
+
+## 📋 Repository Contents
+
+### Models & Assets
+
+- Tokenizers (8k, 16k, 32k, 64k)
+- N-gram models (2, 3, 4, 5-gram)
+- Markov chains (context of 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5)
+- Subword N-gram and Markov chains
+- Embeddings in various sizes and dimensions (aligned and unaligned)
+- Language Vocabulary
+- Language Statistics
+
+![Performance Dashboard](visualizations/performance_dashboard.png)
+
+### Analysis and Evaluation
+
+- [1. Tokenizer Evaluation](#1-tokenizer-evaluation)
+- [2. N-gram Model Evaluation](#2-n-gram-model-evaluation)
+- [3. Markov Chain Evaluation](#3-markov-chain-evaluation)
+- [4. Vocabulary Analysis](#4-vocabulary-analysis)
+- [5. Word Embeddings Evaluation](#5-word-embeddings-evaluation)
+- [6. Morphological Analysis (Experimental)](#6--morphological-analysis-experimental)
+- [7. Summary & Recommendations](#7-summary--recommendations)
+- [Metrics Glossary](#appendix-metrics-glossary--interpretation-guide)
+- [Visualizations Index](#visualizations-index)
+
+---
+## 1. Tokenizer Evaluation
+
+![Tokenizer Compression](visualizations/tokenizer_compression.png)
+
+![Tokenizer Fertility](visualizations/tokenizer_fertility.png)
+
+![Tokenizer OOV](visualizations/tokenizer_oov.png)
+
+![Total Tokens](visualizations/tokenizer_total_tokens.png)
+
+### Results
+
+| Vocab Size | Compression | Avg Token Len | UNK Rate | Total Tokens |
+|------------|-------------|---------------|----------|--------------|
+| **8k** | 3.687x | 3.69 | 0.1485% | 403,994 |
+| **16k** | 3.867x | 3.87 | 0.1558% | 385,154 |
+| **32k** | 4.001x 🏆 | 4.00 | 0.1612% | 372,255 |
+
+### Tokenization Examples
+
+Below are sample sentences tokenized with each vocabulary size:
+
+**Sample 1:** `Buɣum Chuɣu de la de'eŋo n boi northern Ghana so'olum. Yelesi'a n bo de'eŋo la p...`
+
+| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
+|-------|--------|-------|
+| 8k | `▁bu ɣ um ▁ch u ɣ u ▁de ▁la ▁de ... (+22 more)` | 32 |
+| 16k | `▁bu ɣ um ▁chu ɣ u ▁de ▁la ▁de ' ... (+21 more)` | 31 |
+| 32k | `▁bu ɣ um ▁chu ɣ u ▁de ▁la ▁de ' ... (+21 more)` | 31 |
+
+**Sample 2:** `David Acquah' de la Gaana boole ŋwɛ'ara Club Tuuma A Solemitiŋa Tuuma A Miŋa Vom`
+
+| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
+|-------|--------|-------|
+| 8k | `▁david ▁acquah ' ▁de ▁la ▁gaana ▁boole ▁ŋwɛ ' ara ... (+8 more)` | 18 |
+| 16k | `▁david ▁acquah ' ▁de ▁la ▁gaana ▁boole ▁ŋwɛ ' ara ... (+8 more)` | 18 |
+| 32k | `▁david ▁acquah ' ▁de ▁la ▁gaana ▁boole ▁ŋwɛ ' ara ... (+8 more)` | 18 |
+
+**Sample 3:** `William Du Bois Yaw Salhi Kumi (May 5, yuure ken dɛla Koo Kumi.`
+
+| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
+|-------|--------|-------|
+| 8k | `▁william ▁du ▁boi s ▁yaw ▁sal hi ▁kumi ▁( may ... (+9 more)` | 19 |
+| 16k | `▁william ▁du ▁boi s ▁yaw ▁sal hi ▁kumi ▁( may ... (+9 more)` | 19 |
+| 32k | `▁william ▁du ▁bois ▁yaw ▁salhi ▁kumi ▁( may ▁ 5 ... (+7 more)` | 17 |
+
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Compression:** 32k achieves 4.001x compression
+- **Lowest UNK Rate:** 8k with 0.1485% unknown tokens
+- **Trade-off:** Larger vocabularies improve compression but increase model size
+- **Recommendation:** 32k vocabulary provides optimal balance for production use
+
+---
+## 2. N-gram Model Evaluation
+
+![N-gram Perplexity](visualizations/ngram_perplexity.png)
+
+![N-gram Unique](visualizations/ngram_unique.png)
+
+![N-gram Coverage](visualizations/ngram_coverage.png)
+
+### Results
+
+| N-gram | Variant | Perplexity | Entropy | Unique N-grams | Top-100 Coverage | Top-1000 Coverage |
+|--------|---------|------------|---------|----------------|------------------|-------------------|
+| **2-gram** | Word | 2,984 | 11.54 | 12,149 | 29.4% | 60.4% |
+| **2-gram** | Subword | 241 🏆 | 7.92 | 2,090 | 68.4% | 99.3% |
+| **3-gram** | Word | 9,118 | 13.15 | 23,058 | 15.5% | 40.4% |
+| **3-gram** | Subword | 1,660 | 10.70 | 15,739 | 33.3% | 76.7% |
+| **4-gram** | Word | 22,484 | 14.46 | 43,960 | 9.9% | 26.4% |
+| **4-gram** | Subword | 7,120 | 12.80 | 67,011 | 19.0% | 50.9% |
+| **5-gram** | Word | 20,312 | 14.31 | 34,263 | 9.1% | 25.3% |
+| **5-gram** | Subword | 18,752 | 14.19 | 135,527 | 13.4% | 36.8% |
+
+### Top 5 N-grams by Size
+
+**2-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `la puan` | 6,048 |
+| 2 | `de la` | 5,275 |
+| 3 | `ti ba` | 4,735 |
+| 4 | `n de` | 3,480 |
+| 5 | `yuunɛ la` | 3,371 |
+
+**3-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `yuunɛ la puan` | 2,827 |
+| 2 | `e zo e` | 1,083 |
+| 3 | `zo e zo` | 1,080 |
+| 4 | `la puan a` | 938 |
+| 5 | `ba yi ira` | 814 |
+
+**4-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `zo e zo e` | 1,079 |
+| 2 | `ti ba yi ira` | 779 |
+| 3 | `yuunɛ la puan a` | 641 |
+| 4 | `of the 4th republic` | 580 |
+| 5 | `parliament of the 4th` | 573 |
+
+**5-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `parliament of the 4th republic` | 573 |
+| 2 | `ti ba yi ira ti` | 369 |
+| 3 | `nɛreba parliament of the 4th` | 297 |
+| 4 | `nalɛgeriba nɛreba parliament of the` | 292 |
+| 5 | `lɔgerɔ nalɛgeriba nɛreba parliament of` | 266 |
+
+**2-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `a _` | 167,038 |
+| 2 | `l a` | 58,490 |
+| 3 | `_ l` | 56,125 |
+| 4 | `e _` | 52,651 |
+| 5 | `i _` | 52,108 |
+
+**3-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `l a _` | 48,700 |
+| 2 | `_ l a` | 47,930 |
+| 3 | `_ t i` | 22,894 |
+| 4 | `t i _` | 21,274 |
+| 5 | `n a _` | 19,826 |
+
+**4-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `_ l a _` | 42,166 |
+| 2 | `_ y u u` | 16,124 |
+| 3 | `_ t i _` | 15,515 |
+| 4 | `a _ l a` | 12,811 |
+| 5 | `_ p u a` | 11,224 |
+
+**5-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `_ p u a n` | 11,191 |
+| 2 | `a _ l a _` | 10,944 |
+| 3 | `e _ l a _` | 8,770 |
+| 4 | `a _ p u a` | 8,569 |
+| 5 | `_ y u u m` | 8,354 |
+
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Perplexity:** 2-gram (subword) with 241
+- **Entropy Trend:** Decreases with larger n-grams (more predictable)
+- **Coverage:** Top-1000 patterns cover ~37% of corpus
+- **Recommendation:** 4-gram or 5-gram for best predictive performance
+
+---
+## 3. Markov Chain Evaluation
+
+![Markov Entropy](visualizations/markov_entropy.png)
+
+![Markov Contexts](visualizations/markov_contexts.png)
+
+![Markov Branching](visualizations/markov_branching.png)
+
+### Results
+
+| Context | Variant | Avg Entropy | Perplexity | Branching Factor | Unique Contexts | Predictability |
+|---------|---------|-------------|------------|------------------|-----------------|----------------|
+| **1** | Word | 0.7873 | 1.726 | 5.18 | 34,791 | 21.3% |
+| **1** | Subword | 0.8475 | 1.799 | 6.78 | 735 | 15.3% |
+| **2** | Word | 0.2846 | 1.218 | 1.80 | 180,038 | 71.5% |
+| **2** | Subword | 0.9784 | 1.970 | 5.94 | 4,984 | 2.2% |
+| **3** | Word | 0.1408 | 1.102 | 1.29 | 323,151 | 85.9% |
+| **3** | Subword | 0.8530 | 1.806 | 3.93 | 29,621 | 14.7% |
+| **4** | Word | 0.0663 🏆 | 1.047 | 1.11 | 415,146 | 93.4% |
+| **4** | Subword | 0.5923 | 1.508 | 2.47 | 116,449 | 40.8% |
+
+### Generated Text Samples (Word-based)
+
+Below are text samples generated from each word-based Markov chain model:
+
+**Context Size 1:**
+
+1. `la kolesov gee malum dugelegɔ lɔgerɔ ba yi a gce o loe e la za a`
+2. `a characteristically thick dough covered by yaba badoe about alex segbefia 16 years 2 form world`
+3. `ti fu san bɔna tiŋsuka se sɛba iŋa n me bɔ ɔra roads and former swansea`
+
+**Context Size 2:**
+
+1. `la puan indihiang tiŋa tasikmalaya tiŋa la puan la a yuuma la wa tiŋa a kiŋɛ a`
+2. `de la se em n yuum de la são francisco xavier ti ŋwana wa yuum pa ase`
+3. `ti ba yi ira b a economic la pɔlitisi nanana wa a kiŋɛ a sukuu katɛ de`
+
+**Context Size 3:**
+
+1. `yuunɛ la puan bawumia yuum niɛ la dr matthew opoku prempeh ba yuun dugɛ e la yuunɛ la`
+2. `zo e zo e n de sorts of amulets tigera wa n de mina a wan ta am`
+3. `e zo e n nyaa boi ti nɛrawoo yuun mina ti a dena se em la dɔla de`
+
+**Context Size 4:**
+
+1. `zo e zo e daa ka tari tuuma nya daa eŋɛ ba puti ira ti koloni zuoduma la daa`
+2. `ti ba yi ira ti tyre fitting la cold calling la tuuma bɔna ford dagenham a kelum yuum tum`
+3. `yuunɛ la puan a le to e sɛtifiketi bɔna koosego la ligeri yɛla washington yunivɛsiti of world bank m`
+
+
+### Generated Text Samples (Subword-based)
+
+Below are text samples generated from each subword-based Markov chain model:
+
+**Context Size 1:**
+
+1. `_a_iela_b_talena`
+2. `arseryɛra_laa_d_`
+3. `era_n_hrɛ_ss"_n,`
+
+**Context Size 2:**
+
+1. `a_yuum_._ti_sɛ_we`
+2. `la_zo'ela_buum_la`
+3. `_lɔgembese’eloobi`
+
+**Context Size 3:**
+
+1. `la_a_yuum_toni_la,`
+2. `_la_la_pa'am_tiŋa_`
+3. `_til_of_ghama_at_t`
+
+**Context Size 4:**
+
+1. `_la_puan,_ba_kɔm_ba`
+2. `_yuuni_yuum_ta_paat`
+3. `_ti_ba_gee_"efua_tu`
+
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Predictability:** Context-4 (word) with 93.4% predictability
+- **Branching Factor:** Decreases with context size (more deterministic)
+- **Memory Trade-off:** Larger contexts require more storage (116,449 contexts)
+- **Recommendation:** Context-3 or Context-4 for text generation
+
+---
+## 4. Vocabulary Analysis
+
+![Zipf's Law](visualizations/zipf_law.png)
+
+![Top Words](visualizations/top20_words.png)
+
+![Coverage Curve](visualizations/vocab_coverage.png)
+
+### Statistics
+
+| Metric | Value |
+|--------|-------|
+| Vocabulary Size | 15,750 |
+| Total Tokens | 531,469 |
+| Mean Frequency | 33.74 |
+| Median Frequency | 4 |
+| Frequency Std Dev | 489.14 |
+
+### Most Common Words
+
+| Rank | Word | Frequency |
+|------|------|-----------|
+| 1 | la | 45,893 |
+| 2 | a | 16,970 |
+| 3 | ti | 15,755 |
+| 4 | n | 14,415 |
+| 5 | ba | 12,540 |
+| 6 | de | 11,579 |
+| 7 | puan | 11,117 |
+| 8 | yuum | 7,135 |
+| 9 | e | 6,343 |
+| 10 | wa | 5,603 |
+
+### Least Common Words (from vocabulary)
+
+| Rank | Word | Frequency |
+|------|------|-----------|
+| 1 | jurgen | 2 |
+| 2 | martini | 2 |
+| 3 | mcmullan | 2 |
+| 4 | penina | 2 |
+| 5 | mlama | 2 |
+| 6 | richards | 2 |
+| 7 | amowi | 2 |
+| 8 | rotimi | 2 |
+| 9 | watts | 2 |
+| 10 | windley | 2 |
+
+### Zipf's Law Analysis
+
+| Metric | Value |
+|--------|-------|
+| Zipf Coefficient | 1.2037 |
+| R² (Goodness of Fit) | 0.996962 |
+| Adherence Quality | **excellent** |
+
+### Coverage Analysis
+
+| Top N Words | Coverage |
+|-------------|----------|
+| Top 100 | 57.7% |
+| Top 1,000 | 82.5% |
+| Top 5,000 | 93.9% |
+| Top 10,000 | 97.7% |
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Zipf Compliance:** R²=0.9970 indicates excellent adherence to Zipf's law
+- **High Frequency Dominance:** Top 100 words cover 57.7% of corpus
+- **Long Tail:** 5,750 words needed for remaining 2.3% coverage
+
+---
+## 5. Word Embeddings Evaluation
+
+![Embedding Isotropy](visualizations/embedding_isotropy.png)
+
+![Similarity Matrix](visualizations/embedding_similarity.png)
+
+![t-SNE Words](visualizations/tsne_words.png)
+
+![t-SNE Sentences](visualizations/tsne_sentences.png)
+
+
+### 5.1 Cross-Lingual Alignment
+
+![Alignment Quality](visualizations/embedding_alignment_quality.png)
+
+![Multilingual t-SNE](visualizations/embedding_tsne_multilingual.png)
+
+
+### 5.2 Model Comparison
+
+| Model | Dimension | Isotropy | Semantic Density | Alignment R@1 | Alignment R@10 |
+|-------|-----------|----------|------------------|---------------|----------------|
+| **mono_32d** | 32 | 0.7704 🏆 | 0.3622 | N/A | N/A |
+| **mono_64d** | 64 | 0.5062 | 0.3302 | N/A | N/A |
+| **mono_128d** | 128 | 0.1445 | 0.3114 | N/A | N/A |
+| **aligned_32d** | 32 | 0.7704 | 0.3520 | 0.0340 | 0.1900 |
+| **aligned_64d** | 64 | 0.5062 | 0.3219 | 0.0640 | 0.3020 |
+| **aligned_128d** | 128 | 0.1445 | 0.3190 | 0.1120 | 0.3520 |
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Isotropy:** mono_32d with 0.7704 (more uniform distribution)
+- **Semantic Density:** Average pairwise similarity of 0.3328. Lower values indicate better semantic separation.
+- **Alignment Quality:** Aligned models achieve up to 11.2% R@1 in cross-lingual retrieval.
+- **Recommendation:** 128d aligned for best cross-lingual performance
+
+---
+## 6.  Morphological Analysis (Experimental)
+
+This section presents an automated morphological analysis derived from the statistical divergence between word-level and subword-level models. By analyzing where subword predictability spikes and where word-level coverage fails, we can infer linguistic structures without supervised data.
+
+### 6.1 Productivity & Complexity
+
+| Metric | Value | Interpretation | Recommendation |
+|--------|-------|----------------|----------------|
+| Productivity Index | **5.000** | High morphological productivity | Reliable analysis |
+| Idiomaticity Gap | **-0.314** | Low formulaic content | - |
+
+### 6.2 Affix Inventory (Productive Units)
+
+These are the most productive prefixes and suffixes identified by sampling the vocabulary for global substitutability patterns. A unit is considered an affix if stripping it leaves a valid stem that appears in other contexts.
+
+#### Productive Prefixes
+| Prefix | Examples |
+|--------|----------|
+
+#### Productive Suffixes
+| Suffix | Examples |
+|--------|----------|
+| `-a` | solemitiŋa, nangooma, bawadua |
+
+### 6.3 Bound Stems (Lexical Roots)
+
+Bound stems are high-frequency subword units that are semantically cohesive but rarely appear as standalone words. These often correspond to the 'core' of a word that requires inflection or derivation to be valid.
+
+| Stem | Cohesion | Substitutability | Examples |
+|------|----------|------------------|----------|
+| `gera` | 1.96x | 37 contexts | ɛgera, ãgera, ugera |
+| `ɔger` | 1.60x | 30 contexts | bɔgerɛ, tɔgera, yɔgera |
+| `iger` | 1.64x | 25 contexts | niger, digeri, tigera |
+| `atio` | 1.94x | 14 contexts | nation, nations, station |
+| `rega` | 1.64x | 22 contexts | ɛrega, ãarega, tɛrega |
+| `elum` | 1.81x | 15 contexts | belum, celum, kelum |
+| `tion` | 1.85x | 13 contexts | action, option, nation |
+| `segɔ` | 1.67x | 16 contexts | osegɔ, isegɔ, ɔsegɔ |
+| `reba` | 1.62x | 17 contexts | ireba, ɛreba, areba |
+| `gerɔ` | 2.03x | 9 contexts | sɔgerɔ, logerɔ, pɔgerɔ |
+| `ɛger` | 1.54x | 17 contexts | ɛgera, pɛgerɛ, sɛgerɛ |
+| `aana` | 1.73x | 12 contexts | gaana, paana, baana |
+
+### 6.4 Affix Compatibility (Co-occurrence)
+
+This table shows which prefixes and suffixes most frequently co-occur on the same stems, revealing the 'stacking' rules of the language's morphology.
+
+*No significant affix co-occurrences detected.*
+
+
+### 6.5 Recursive Morpheme Segmentation
+
+Using **Recursive Hierarchical Substitutability**, we decompose complex words into their constituent morphemes. This approach handles nested affixes (e.g., `prefix-prefix-root-suffix`).
+
+*Insufficient data for recursive segmentation.*
+
+
+### 6.6 Linguistic Interpretation
+
+> **Automated Insight:**
+The language Frafra shows high morphological productivity. The subword models are significantly more efficient than word models, suggesting a rich system of affixation or compounding.
+
+---
+## 7. Summary & Recommendations
+
+![Performance Dashboard](visualizations/performance_dashboard.png)
+
+### Production Recommendations
+
+| Component | Recommended | Rationale |
+|-----------|-------------|-----------|
+| Tokenizer | **32k BPE** | Best compression (4.00x) |
+| N-gram | **2-gram** | Lowest perplexity (241) |
+| Markov | **Context-4** | Highest predictability (93.4%) |
+| Embeddings | **100d** | Balanced semantic capture and isotropy |
+
+
+---
+## Appendix: Metrics Glossary & Interpretation Guide
+
+This section provides definitions, intuitions, and guidance for interpreting the metrics used throughout this report.
+
+### Tokenizer Metrics
+
+**Compression Ratio**
+> *Definition:* The ratio of characters to tokens (chars/token). Measures how efficiently the tokenizer represents text.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Higher compression means fewer tokens needed to represent the same text, reducing sequence lengths for downstream models. A 3x compression means ~3 characters per token on average.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Higher is generally better for efficiency, but extremely high compression may indicate overly aggressive merging that loses morphological information.
+
+**Average Token Length (Fertility)**
+> *Definition:* Mean number of characters per token produced by the tokenizer.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Reflects the granularity of tokenization. Longer tokens capture more context but may struggle with rare words; shorter tokens are more flexible but increase sequence length.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Balance between 2-5 characters for most languages. Arabic/morphologically-rich languages may benefit from slightly longer tokens.
+
+**Unknown Token Rate (OOV Rate)**
+> *Definition:* Percentage of tokens that map to the unknown/UNK token, indicating words the tokenizer cannot represent.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Lower OOV means better vocabulary coverage. High OOV indicates the tokenizer encounters many unseen character sequences.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Below 1% is excellent; below 5% is acceptable. BPE tokenizers typically achieve very low OOV due to subword fallback.
+
+### N-gram Model Metrics
+
+**Perplexity**
+> *Definition:* Measures how "surprised" the model is by test data. Mathematically: 2^(cross-entropy). Lower values indicate better prediction.
+>
+> *Intuition:* If perplexity is 100, the model is as uncertain as if choosing uniformly among 100 options at each step. A perplexity of 10 means effectively choosing among 10 equally likely options.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Lower is better. Perplexity decreases with larger n-grams (more context). Values vary widely by language and corpus size.
+
+**Entropy**
+> *Definition:* Average information content (in bits) needed to encode the next token given the context. Related to perplexity: perplexity = 2^entropy.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High entropy means high uncertainty/randomness; low entropy means predictable patterns. Natural language typically has entropy between 1-4 bits per character.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Lower entropy indicates more predictable text patterns. Entropy should decrease as n-gram size increases.
+
+**Coverage (Top-K)**
+> *Definition:* Percentage of corpus occurrences explained by the top K most frequent n-grams.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High coverage with few patterns indicates repetitive/formulaic text; low coverage suggests diverse vocabulary usage.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Depends on use case. For language modeling, moderate coverage (40-60% with top-1000) is typical for natural text.
+
+### Markov Chain Metrics
+
+**Average Entropy**
+> *Definition:* Mean entropy across all contexts, measuring average uncertainty in next-word prediction.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Lower entropy means the model is more confident about what comes next. Context-1 has high entropy (many possible next words); Context-4 has low entropy (few likely continuations).
+>
+> *What to seek:* Decreasing entropy with larger context sizes. Very low entropy (<0.1) indicates highly deterministic transitions.
+
+**Branching Factor**
+> *Definition:* Average number of unique next tokens observed for each context.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High branching = many possible continuations (flexible but uncertain); low branching = few options (predictable but potentially repetitive).
+>
+> *What to seek:* Branching factor should decrease with context size. Values near 1.0 indicate nearly deterministic chains.
+
+**Predictability**
+> *Definition:* Derived metric: (1 - normalized_entropy) × 100%. Indicates how deterministic the model's predictions are.
+>
+> *Intuition:* 100% predictability means the next word is always certain; 0% means completely random. Real text falls between these extremes.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Higher predictability for text generation quality, but too high (>98%) may produce repetitive output.
+
+### Vocabulary & Zipf's Law Metrics
+
+**Zipf's Coefficient**
+> *Definition:* The slope of the log-log plot of word frequency vs. rank. Zipf's law predicts this should be approximately -1.
+>
+> *Intuition:* A coefficient near -1 indicates the corpus follows natural language patterns where a few words are very common and most words are rare.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Values between -0.8 and -1.2 indicate healthy natural language distribution. Deviations may suggest domain-specific or artificial text.
+
+**R² (Coefficient of Determination)**
+> *Definition:* Measures how well the linear fit explains the frequency-rank relationship. Ranges from 0 to 1.
+>
+> *Intuition:* R² near 1.0 means the data closely follows Zipf's law; lower values indicate deviation from expected word frequency patterns.
+>
+> *What to seek:* R² > 0.95 is excellent; > 0.99 indicates near-perfect Zipf adherence typical of large natural corpora.
+
+**Vocabulary Coverage**
+> *Definition:* Cumulative percentage of corpus tokens accounted for by the top N words.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Shows how concentrated word usage is. If top-100 words cover 50% of text, the corpus relies heavily on common words.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Top-100 covering 30-50% is typical. Higher coverage indicates more repetitive text; lower suggests richer vocabulary.
+
+### Word Embedding Metrics
+
+**Isotropy**
+> *Definition:* Measures how uniformly distributed vectors are in the embedding space. Computed as the ratio of minimum to maximum singular values.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High isotropy (near 1.0) means vectors spread evenly in all directions; low isotropy means vectors cluster in certain directions, reducing expressiveness.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Higher isotropy generally indicates better-quality embeddings. Values > 0.1 are reasonable; > 0.3 is good. Lower-dimensional embeddings tend to have higher isotropy.
+
+**Average Norm**
+> *Definition:* Mean magnitude (L2 norm) of word vectors in the embedding space.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Indicates the typical "length" of vectors. Consistent norms suggest stable training; high variance may indicate some words are undertrained.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Relatively consistent norms across models. The absolute value matters less than consistency (low std deviation).
+
+**Cosine Similarity**
+> *Definition:* Measures angular similarity between vectors, ranging from -1 (opposite) to 1 (identical direction).
+>
+> *Intuition:* Words with similar meanings should have high cosine similarity. This is the standard metric for semantic relatedness in embeddings.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Semantically related words should score > 0.5; unrelated words should be near 0. Synonyms often score > 0.7.
+
+**t-SNE Visualization**
+> *Definition:* t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding - a dimensionality reduction technique that preserves local structure for visualization.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Clusters in t-SNE plots indicate groups of semantically related words. Spread indicates vocabulary diversity; tight clusters suggest semantic coherence.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Meaningful clusters (e.g., numbers together, verbs together). Avoid over-interpreting distances - t-SNE preserves local, not global, structure.
+
+### General Interpretation Guidelines
+
+1. **Compare within model families:** Metrics are most meaningful when comparing models of the same type (e.g., 8k vs 64k tokenizer).
+2. **Consider trade-offs:** Better performance on one metric often comes at the cost of another (e.g., compression vs. OOV rate).
+3. **Context matters:** Optimal values depend on downstream tasks. Text generation may prioritize different metrics than classification.
+4. **Corpus influence:** All metrics are influenced by corpus characteristics. Wikipedia text differs from social media or literature.
+5. **Language-specific patterns:** Morphologically rich languages (like Arabic) may show different optimal ranges than analytic languages.
+
+
+### Visualizations Index
+
+| Visualization | Description |
+|---------------|-------------|
+| Tokenizer Compression | Compression ratios by vocabulary size |
+| Tokenizer Fertility | Average token length by vocabulary |
+| Tokenizer OOV | Unknown token rates |
+| Tokenizer Total Tokens | Total tokens by vocabulary |
+| N-gram Perplexity | Perplexity by n-gram size |
+| N-gram Entropy | Entropy by n-gram size |
+| N-gram Coverage | Top pattern coverage |
+| N-gram Unique | Unique n-gram counts |
+| Markov Entropy | Entropy by context size |
+| Markov Branching | Branching factor by context |
+| Markov Contexts | Unique context counts |
+| Zipf's Law | Frequency-rank distribution with fit |
+| Vocab Frequency | Word frequency distribution |
+| Top 20 Words | Most frequent words |
+| Vocab Coverage | Cumulative coverage curve |
+| Embedding Isotropy | Vector space uniformity |
+| Embedding Norms | Vector magnitude distribution |
+| Embedding Similarity | Word similarity heatmap |
+| Nearest Neighbors | Similar words for key terms |
+| t-SNE Words | 2D word embedding visualization |
+| t-SNE Sentences | 2D sentence embedding visualization |
+| Position Encoding | Encoding method comparison |
+| Model Sizes | Storage requirements |
+| Performance Dashboard | Comprehensive performance overview |
+
+---
+## About This Project
+
+### Data Source
+
+Models trained on [wikipedia-monthly](https://huggingface.co/datasets/omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly) - a monthly snapshot of Wikipedia articles across 300+ languages.
+
+### Project
+
+A project by **[Wikilangs](https://wikilangs.org)** - Open-source NLP models for every Wikipedia language.
+
+### Maintainer
+
+[Omar Kamali](https://omarkamali.com) - [Omneity Labs](https://omneitylabs.com)
+
+### Citation
+
+If you use these models in your research, please cite:
+
+```bibtex
+@misc{wikilangs2025,
+  author = {Kamali, Omar},
+  title = {Wikilangs: Open NLP Models for Wikipedia Languages},
+  year = {2025},
+  doi = {10.5281/zenodo.18073153},
+  publisher = {Zenodo},
+  url = {https://huggingface.co/wikilangs}
+  institution = {Omneity Labs}
+}
+```
+
+### License
+
+MIT License - Free for academic and commercial use.
+
+### Links
+
+- 🌐 Website: [wikilangs.org](https://wikilangs.org)
+- 🤗 Models: [huggingface.co/wikilangs](https://huggingface.co/wikilangs)
+- 📊 Data: [wikipedia-monthly](https://huggingface.co/datasets/omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly)
+- 👤 Author: [Omar Kamali](https://huggingface.co/omarkamali)
+- 🤝 Sponsor: [Featherless AI](https://featherless.ai)
+---
+*Generated by Wikilangs Models Pipeline*
+
+*Report Date: 2026-01-10 00:37:19*

models/embeddings/aligned/gur_128d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:0547780df961ba0cad5fdfd6064d4d5a86e9433a04bd6c28873ff55d8939686f
+size 1031491553

models/embeddings/aligned/gur_128d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "gur", "dim": 128, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": true}

models/embeddings/aligned/gur_128d.projection.npy

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:49eb1282eebecf1e2f3e07f0e8118185c69c71ba148c4300cd72b36f9a0ef5bc
+size 65664

models/embeddings/aligned/gur_128d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+{
+  "language": "gur",
+  "dimension": 128,
+  "version": "aligned",
+  "hub_language": "en",
+  "seed_vocab_size": 3303,
+  "vocab_size": 7202
+}

models/embeddings/aligned/gur_32d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:252c1efd4d91c72ccbe4fd0ca1ae92269f030cfeedd1a4ec82f3e80e2dcbd207
+size 257960417

models/embeddings/aligned/gur_32d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "gur", "dim": 32, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": true}

models/embeddings/aligned/gur_32d.projection.npy

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:7da28bb2bf0d4f8c001c7fcec7233e6a644a04f1891d8d47fbde4877e8db59a0
+size 4224

models/embeddings/aligned/gur_32d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+{
+  "language": "gur",
+  "dimension": 32,
+  "version": "aligned",
+  "hub_language": "en",
+  "seed_vocab_size": 3303,
+  "vocab_size": 7202
+}

models/embeddings/aligned/gur_64d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:86c6d4681570655babb737a314ca1ad16d9efeec2bdb393ad65cd4dfe0550d01
+size 515804129

models/embeddings/aligned/gur_64d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "gur", "dim": 64, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": true}

models/embeddings/aligned/gur_64d.projection.npy

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:4782bf2f11db2bff4cd914b76444106fe33a8f6dcf6f3ab01eff5da8056cc7bf
+size 16512

models/embeddings/aligned/gur_64d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+{
+  "language": "gur",
+  "dimension": 64,
+  "version": "aligned",
+  "hub_language": "en",
+  "seed_vocab_size": 3303,
+  "vocab_size": 7202
+}

models/embeddings/monolingual/gur_128d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:0547780df961ba0cad5fdfd6064d4d5a86e9433a04bd6c28873ff55d8939686f
+size 1031491553

models/embeddings/monolingual/gur_128d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "gur", "dim": 128, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": false}

models/embeddings/monolingual/gur_128d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+{
+  "language": "gur",
+  "dimension": 128,
+  "version": "monolingual",
+  "training_params": {
+    "algorithm": "skipgram",
+    "min_count": 5,
+    "window": 5,
+    "negative": 5,
+    "epochs": 5,
+    "encoding_method": "rope",
+    "dim": 128
+  },
+  "vocab_size": 7202
+}

models/embeddings/monolingual/gur_32d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:252c1efd4d91c72ccbe4fd0ca1ae92269f030cfeedd1a4ec82f3e80e2dcbd207
+size 257960417

models/embeddings/monolingual/gur_32d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "gur", "dim": 32, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": false}

models/embeddings/monolingual/gur_32d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+{
+  "language": "gur",
+  "dimension": 32,
+  "version": "monolingual",
+  "training_params": {
+    "algorithm": "skipgram",
+    "min_count": 5,
+    "window": 5,
+    "negative": 5,
+    "epochs": 5,
+    "encoding_method": "rope",
+    "dim": 32
+  },
+  "vocab_size": 7202
+}

models/embeddings/monolingual/gur_64d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:86c6d4681570655babb737a314ca1ad16d9efeec2bdb393ad65cd4dfe0550d01
+size 515804129

models/embeddings/monolingual/gur_64d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "gur", "dim": 64, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": false}

models/embeddings/monolingual/gur_64d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+{
+  "language": "gur",
+  "dimension": 64,
+  "version": "monolingual",
+  "training_params": {
+    "algorithm": "skipgram",
+    "min_count": 5,
+    "window": 5,
+    "negative": 5,
+    "epochs": 5,
+    "encoding_method": "rope",
+    "dim": 64
+  },
+  "vocab_size": 7202
+}

models/subword_markov/gur_markov_ctx1_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:5e321732e4504d7a223bce3659cb376643efdd877a17fb718603fbae81874446
+size 44993

models/subword_markov/gur_markov_ctx1_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 1,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "gur",
+  "unique_contexts": 735,
+  "total_transitions": 2763422
+}

models/subword_markov/gur_markov_ctx2_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:9fefe4d10221a37fca68d5282c2cd87f50b0ab4d982a876ce1440d1be9b8d7f4
+size 240910

models/subword_markov/gur_markov_ctx2_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 2,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "gur",
+  "unique_contexts": 4984,
+  "total_transitions": 2761818
+}

models/subword_markov/gur_markov_ctx3_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:de2f8317ef0c0a45893bf73140baa25ea369486d088931b9c5492f6189655550
+size 891988

models/subword_markov/gur_markov_ctx3_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 3,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "gur",
+  "unique_contexts": 29621,
+  "total_transitions": 2760214
+}

models/subword_markov/gur_markov_ctx4_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:d33c631f7a1cd0329a449a89ff2e2065044a31aa7985b86d80c7c604c7486d00
+size 2274530

models/subword_markov/gur_markov_ctx4_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 4,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "gur",
+  "unique_contexts": 116449,
+  "total_transitions": 2758610
+}

models/subword_ngram/gur_2gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:46e56529c1d904863ee583489cdf75ab23d02f34addff9ec227541bda72a6d30
+size 28479

models/subword_ngram/gur_2gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 2,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "gur",
+  "unique_ngrams": 2090,
+  "total_ngrams": 2763422
+}

models/subword_ngram/gur_3gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:986506f22692de44f0b7195049f9d6078a0d9bfec56a50dd4240b41ccca2393a
+size 184497

models/subword_ngram/gur_3gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 3,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "gur",
+  "unique_ngrams": 15739,
+  "total_ngrams": 2761818
+}

models/subword_ngram/gur_4gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:24ac5f09d2eac7b72928988899881a08fc6a2665718dc533755249c87969d47d
+size 790430

models/subword_ngram/gur_4gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 4,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "gur",
+  "unique_ngrams": 67011,
+  "total_ngrams": 2760214
+}

models/subword_ngram/gur_5gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:d71fa13c851f232ecd2fcb88b78f90344167dd4e2d0a469c414aedc03a1b1df6
+size 1560470

models/subword_ngram/gur_5gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 5,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "gur",
+  "unique_ngrams": 135527,
+  "total_ngrams": 2758610
+}

models/tokenizer/gur_tokenizer_16k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:31de1c588823f068f85ed64c3891c795762777e705a7b16cae9e501bc25091af
+size 504726

models/tokenizer/gur_tokenizer_32k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:3d290032d91350372e2caab62799069dea9a9f3e611ae6dcefd3034d2ebf8045
+size 787878

models/tokenizer/gur_tokenizer_8k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:170f02b71753450e0d183646625d39db1010a82bef4406ccc165f4e49060fd01
+size 372547

models/vocabulary/gur_vocabulary.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:a983e9ef6adc976c788327d510017bba4947666aaf278934e8c0cecc443ff481
+size 259482

models/vocabulary/gur_vocabulary_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+{
+  "language": "gur",
+  "vocabulary_size": 15750,
+  "variant": "full",
+  "statistics": {
+    "type_token_ratio": 0.0632743322647147,
+    "coverage": {
+      "top_100": 0.5566383013504554,
+      "top_1000": 0.7960439919717376,
+      "top_5000": 0.9064998047424871,
+      "top_10000": 0.9433989338031623
+    },
+    "hapax_count": 19086,
+    "hapax_ratio": 0.5478815018945918,
+    "total_documents": 1604
+  }
+}

models/word_markov/gur_markov_ctx1_word.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:383005e70b6c03577044e26aa4fdae283aa7e864ba52dde84a1d268edb006430
+size 1310920

models/word_markov/gur_markov_ctx1_word_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 1,
+  "variant": "word",
+  "language": "gur",
+  "unique_contexts": 34791,
+  "total_transitions": 548951
+}

models/word_markov/gur_markov_ctx2_word.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:2d76e589f7da98c44caac7814142f5d9937916198a691ec79ac78ea8c832e016
+size 3276055