Upload all models and assets for ilo (latest)

.gitattributes

@@ -33,3 +33,10 @@ saved_model/**/* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *.zip filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *.zst filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *tfevents* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/embedding_similarity.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/embedding_tsne_multilingual.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/performance_dashboard.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/position_encoding_comparison.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/tsne_sentences.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/tsne_words.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/zipf_law.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text

README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,773 @@
+---
+language: ilo
+language_name: Iloko
+language_family: austronesian_philippine_northern
+tags:
+  - wikilangs
+  - nlp
+  - tokenizer
+  - embeddings
+  - n-gram
+  - markov
+  - wikipedia
+  - feature-extraction
+  - sentence-similarity
+  - tokenization
+  - n-grams
+  - markov-chain
+  - text-mining
+  - fasttext
+  - babelvec
+  - vocabulous
+  - vocabulary
+  - monolingual
+  - family-austronesian_philippine_northern
+license: mit
+library_name: wikilangs
+pipeline_tag: text-generation
+datasets:
+  - omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly
+dataset_info:
+  name: wikipedia-monthly
+  description: Monthly snapshots of Wikipedia articles across 300+ languages
+metrics:
+  - name: best_compression_ratio
+    type: compression
+    value: 4.543
+  - name: best_isotropy
+    type: isotropy
+    value: 0.8576
+  - name: vocabulary_size
+    type: vocab
+    value: 0
+generated: 2026-01-10
+---
+
+# Iloko - Wikilangs Models
+## Comprehensive Research Report & Full Ablation Study
+
+This repository contains NLP models trained and evaluated by Wikilangs, specifically on **Iloko** Wikipedia data.
+We analyze tokenizers, n-gram models, Markov chains, vocabulary statistics, and word embeddings.
+
+## 📋 Repository Contents
+
+### Models & Assets
+
+- Tokenizers (8k, 16k, 32k, 64k)
+- N-gram models (2, 3, 4, 5-gram)
+- Markov chains (context of 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5)
+- Subword N-gram and Markov chains
+- Embeddings in various sizes and dimensions (aligned and unaligned)
+- Language Vocabulary
+- Language Statistics
+
+![Performance Dashboard](visualizations/performance_dashboard.png)
+
+### Analysis and Evaluation
+
+- [1. Tokenizer Evaluation](#1-tokenizer-evaluation)
+- [2. N-gram Model Evaluation](#2-n-gram-model-evaluation)
+- [3. Markov Chain Evaluation](#3-markov-chain-evaluation)
+- [4. Vocabulary Analysis](#4-vocabulary-analysis)
+- [5. Word Embeddings Evaluation](#5-word-embeddings-evaluation)
+- [6. Morphological Analysis (Experimental)](#6--morphological-analysis-experimental)
+- [7. Summary & Recommendations](#7-summary--recommendations)
+- [Metrics Glossary](#appendix-metrics-glossary--interpretation-guide)
+- [Visualizations Index](#visualizations-index)
+
+---
+## 1. Tokenizer Evaluation
+
+![Tokenizer Compression](visualizations/tokenizer_compression.png)
+
+![Tokenizer Fertility](visualizations/tokenizer_fertility.png)
+
+![Tokenizer OOV](visualizations/tokenizer_oov.png)
+
+![Total Tokens](visualizations/tokenizer_total_tokens.png)
+
+### Results
+
+| Vocab Size | Compression | Avg Token Len | UNK Rate | Total Tokens |
+|------------|-------------|---------------|----------|--------------|
+| **8k** | 3.747x | 3.75 | 0.1290% | 366,711 |
+| **16k** | 4.060x | 4.06 | 0.1397% | 338,491 |
+| **32k** | 4.334x | 4.34 | 0.1492% | 317,024 |
+| **64k** | 4.543x 🏆 | 4.55 | 0.1564% | 302,462 |
+
+### Tokenization Examples
+
+Below are sample sentences tokenized with each vocabulary size:
+
+**Sample 1:** `Ti tawen idi ket kadawyan a tawen a nangrugi iti Martes (iparang ti silpo ti nap...`
+
+| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
+|-------|--------|-------|
+| 8k | `▁ti ▁tawen ▁idi ▁ket ▁kadawyan ▁a ▁tawen ▁a ▁nangrugi ▁iti ... (+19 more)` | 29 |
+| 16k | `▁ti ▁tawen ▁idi ▁ket ▁kadawyan ▁a ▁tawen ▁a ▁nangrugi ▁iti ... (+19 more)` | 29 |
+| 32k | `▁ti ▁tawen ▁idi ▁ket ▁kadawyan ▁a ▁tawen ▁a ▁nangrugi ▁iti ... (+19 more)` | 29 |
+| 64k | `▁ti ▁tawen ▁idi ▁ket ▁kadawyan ▁a ▁tawen ▁a ▁nangrugi ▁iti ... (+19 more)` | 29 |
+
+**Sample 2:** `Ti tawen idi ket kadawyan a tawen a nangrugi iti Domingo (iparang ti silpo ti na...`
+
+| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
+|-------|--------|-------|
+| 8k | `▁ti ▁tawen ▁idi ▁ket ▁kadawyan ▁a ▁tawen ▁a ▁nangrugi ▁iti ... (+19 more)` | 29 |
+| 16k | `▁ti ▁tawen ▁idi ▁ket ▁kadawyan ▁a ▁tawen ▁a ▁nangrugi ▁iti ... (+19 more)` | 29 |
+| 32k | `▁ti ▁tawen ▁idi ▁ket ▁kadawyan ▁a ▁tawen ▁a ▁nangrugi ▁iti ... (+19 more)` | 29 |
+| 64k | `▁ti ▁tawen ▁idi ▁ket ▁kadawyan ▁a ▁tawen ▁a ▁nangrugi ▁iti ... (+19 more)` | 29 |
+
+**Sample 3:** `Ti tawen idi ket kadawyan a tawen a nangrugi iti Domingo (iparang ti silpo ti na...`
+
+| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
+|-------|--------|-------|
+| 8k | `▁ti ▁tawen ▁idi ▁ket ▁kadawyan ▁a ▁tawen ▁a ▁nangrugi ▁iti ... (+19 more)` | 29 |
+| 16k | `▁ti ▁tawen ▁idi ▁ket ▁kadawyan ▁a ▁tawen ▁a ▁nangrugi ▁iti ... (+19 more)` | 29 |
+| 32k | `▁ti ▁tawen ▁idi ▁ket ▁kadawyan ▁a ▁tawen ▁a ▁nangrugi ▁iti ... (+19 more)` | 29 |
+| 64k | `▁ti ▁tawen ▁idi ▁ket ▁kadawyan ▁a ▁tawen ▁a ▁nangrugi ▁iti ... (+19 more)` | 29 |
+
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Compression:** 64k achieves 4.543x compression
+- **Lowest UNK Rate:** 8k with 0.1290% unknown tokens
+- **Trade-off:** Larger vocabularies improve compression but increase model size
+- **Recommendation:** 32k vocabulary provides optimal balance for production use
+
+---
+## 2. N-gram Model Evaluation
+
+![N-gram Perplexity](visualizations/ngram_perplexity.png)
+
+![N-gram Unique](visualizations/ngram_unique.png)
+
+![N-gram Coverage](visualizations/ngram_coverage.png)
+
+### Results
+
+| N-gram | Variant | Perplexity | Entropy | Unique N-grams | Top-100 Coverage | Top-1000 Coverage |
+|--------|---------|------------|---------|----------------|------------------|-------------------|
+| **2-gram** | Word | 9,671 | 13.24 | 49,471 | 18.3% | 45.5% |
+| **2-gram** | Subword | 205 🏆 | 7.68 | 3,758 | 74.6% | 99.5% |
+| **3-gram** | Word | 23,415 | 14.52 | 90,863 | 12.7% | 32.8% |
+| **3-gram** | Subword | 1,534 | 10.58 | 27,777 | 35.7% | 77.2% |
+| **4-gram** | Word | 42,394 | 15.37 | 148,452 | 11.4% | 27.1% |
+| **4-gram** | Subword | 7,324 | 12.84 | 148,845 | 21.9% | 51.1% |
+| **5-gram** | Word | 29,789 | 14.86 | 103,807 | 12.6% | 30.6% |
+| **5-gram** | Subword | 21,347 | 14.38 | 384,749 | 15.0% | 38.4% |
+
+### Top 5 N-grams by Size
+
+**2-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `dagiti nagibasaran` | 11,555 |
+| 2 | `maysa a` | 10,904 |
+| 3 | `ket ti` | 10,192 |
+| 4 | `a kas` | 9,434 |
+| 5 | `daytoy ket` | 8,282 |
+
+**3-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `akinruar a silpo` | 7,499 |
+| 2 | `dagiti akinruar a` | 7,494 |
+| 3 | `dagiti nagibasaran dagiti` | 4,617 |
+| 4 | `nagibasaran dagiti akinruar` | 4,453 |
+| 5 | `ket maysa a` | 3,557 |
+
+**4-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `dagiti akinruar a silpo` | 7,484 |
+| 2 | `nagibasaran dagiti akinruar a` | 4,453 |
+| 3 | `dagiti nagibasaran dagiti akinruar` | 4,434 |
+| 4 | `mula iti pamilia ti` | 2,523 |
+| 5 | `ket ti sebbangan ti` | 2,099 |
+
+**5-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `nagibasaran dagiti akinruar a silpo` | 4,449 |
+| 2 | `dagiti nagibasaran dagiti akinruar a` | 4,434 |
+| 3 | `demograpia dagiti nagibasaran dagiti akinruar` | 1,659 |
+| 4 | `ti mula iti pamilia ti` | 1,601 |
+| 5 | `sebbangan ti mula iti pamilia` | 1,520 |
+
+**2-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `a _` | 526,058 |
+| 2 | `i _` | 499,068 |
+| 3 | `t i` | 477,610 |
+| 4 | `_ a` | 378,705 |
+| 5 | `a n` | 376,214 |
+
+**3-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `t i _` | 426,029 |
+| 2 | `_ a _` | 234,251 |
+| 3 | `_ t i` | 225,448 |
+| 4 | `i t i` | 197,634 |
+| 5 | `a n _` | 128,518 |
+
+**4-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `_ t i _` | 218,539 |
+| 2 | `i t i _` | 190,580 |
+| 3 | `_ i t i` | 103,474 |
+| 4 | `a g i t` | 91,630 |
+| 5 | `d a g i` | 91,219 |
+
+**5-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `_ i t i _` | 102,341 |
+| 2 | `d a g i t` | 90,946 |
+| 3 | `a g i t i` | 87,738 |
+| 4 | `g i t i _` | 87,510 |
+| 5 | `_ k e t _` | 71,576 |
+
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Perplexity:** 2-gram (subword) with 205
+- **Entropy Trend:** Decreases with larger n-grams (more predictable)
+- **Coverage:** Top-1000 patterns cover ~38% of corpus
+- **Recommendation:** 4-gram or 5-gram for best predictive performance
+
+---
+## 3. Markov Chain Evaluation
+
+![Markov Entropy](visualizations/markov_entropy.png)
+
+![Markov Contexts](visualizations/markov_contexts.png)
+
+![Markov Branching](visualizations/markov_branching.png)
+
+### Results
+
+| Context | Variant | Avg Entropy | Perplexity | Branching Factor | Unique Contexts | Predictability |
+|---------|---------|-------------|------------|------------------|-----------------|----------------|
+| **1** | Word | 0.7561 | 1.689 | 4.87 | 138,794 | 24.4% |
+| **1** | Subword | 0.8199 | 1.765 | 5.06 | 2,636 | 18.0% |
+| **2** | Word | 0.3125 | 1.242 | 1.94 | 673,934 | 68.7% |
+| **2** | Subword | 0.7122 | 1.638 | 4.45 | 13,337 | 28.8% |
+| **3** | Word | 0.1495 | 1.109 | 1.34 | 1,305,896 | 85.0% |
+| **3** | Subword | 0.7826 | 1.720 | 4.17 | 59,341 | 21.7% |
+| **4** | Word | 0.0702 🏆 | 1.050 | 1.12 | 1,742,668 | 93.0% |
+| **4** | Subword | 0.7028 | 1.628 | 3.04 | 247,602 | 29.7% |
+
+### Generated Text Samples (Word-based)
+
+Below are text samples generated from each word-based Markov chain model:
+
+**Context Size 1:**
+
+1. `a pagbeddengan ti madang ti gunglo ti limba românăroronrum ron langeveld ti sistema sistema ti punto`
+2. `ti pagsasao a mangiada ti turko nga antenada ken ti habitat dagiti nagibasaran triandra kadawyan iti`
+3. `iti bukel kalapsan ti populasionna maysa kadagiti bukodda nga idi pimmusay otto warburg e daytoy ket`
+
+**Context Size 2:**
+
+1. `dagiti nagibasaran dagiti akinruar a silpo opisial a pagurasan ti nagbanagan daytoy a panagusar iti ...`
+2. `maysa a maika 3 a klase nga ili iti probinsia ti cebu ket isu idi idiay estados`
+3. `ket ti siudad ti tsina bagi ti ioc ti rambakan nga aldaw a kalendario iti kalendario a`
+
+**Context Size 3:**
+
+1. `dagiti akinruar a silpo ili ti quirino ti maddela nagtipunan cabarroguis aglipay ken diffun kaaduan ...`
+2. `akinruar a silpo naenara opisial a portal ti gobierno opisial a sitio ti turismo ti karabakh siudad ...`
+3. `dagiti nagibasaran dagiti akinruar a silpo siudad ti mehiko ciudad de méxico ken ti maika 7 a meridi...`
+
+**Context Size 4:**
+
+1. `dagiti akinruar a silpo directory of current japanese city leaders and outline of system japans evol...`
+2. `nagibasaran dagiti akinruar a silpo website ti siudad ti san pablo siudad ti san pedro population 57...`
+3. `dagiti nagibasaran dagiti akinruar a silpo opisial a website ti andaman ken nicobar grupo ti etniko ...`
+
+
+### Generated Text Samples (Subword-based)
+
+Below are text samples generated from each subword-based Markov chain model:
+
+**Context Size 1:**
+
+1. `a;_mangima_saket`
+2. `_ril,_ng_ka-a_na`
+3. `ikaba_kerapipa_m`
+
+**Context Size 2:**
+
+1. `a_aca_a_mūrīshimb`
+2. `i_ngpo_ket_da_kam`
+3. `ti_a_demics._mawe`
+
+**Context Size 3:**
+
+1. `ti_kaman_zimbahnam`
+2. `_a_heogress:_annak`
+3. `_ti_dagiti_filia_h`
+
+**Context Size 4:**
+
+1. `_ti_dua_nga_engling`
+2. `iti_agarup_a_karaka`
+3. `_iti_karl_edisiesto`
+
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Predictability:** Context-4 (word) with 93.0% predictability
+- **Branching Factor:** Decreases with context size (more deterministic)
+- **Memory Trade-off:** Larger contexts require more storage (247,602 contexts)
+- **Recommendation:** Context-3 or Context-4 for text generation
+
+---
+## 4. Vocabulary Analysis
+
+![Zipf's Law](visualizations/zipf_law.png)
+
+![Top Words](visualizations/top20_words.png)
+
+![Coverage Curve](visualizations/vocab_coverage.png)
+
+### Statistics
+
+| Metric | Value |
+|--------|-------|
+| Vocabulary Size | 60,623 |
+| Total Tokens | 2,400,884 |
+| Mean Frequency | 39.60 |
+| Median Frequency | 4 |
+| Frequency Std Dev | 1521.44 |
+
+### Most Common Words
+
+| Rank | Word | Frequency |
+|------|------|-----------|
+| 1 | a | 237,485 |
+| 2 | ti | 233,421 |
+| 3 | iti | 103,626 |
+| 4 | ket | 71,830 |
+| 5 | dagiti | 62,492 |
+| 6 | nga | 53,917 |
+| 7 | ken | 48,636 |
+| 8 | kadagiti | 24,755 |
+| 9 | idi | 21,971 |
+| 10 | maysa | 16,740 |
+
+### Least Common Words (from vocabulary)
+
+| Rank | Word | Frequency |
+|------|------|-----------|
+| 1 | mainom | 2 |
+| 2 | epektoda | 2 |
+| 3 | medulla | 2 |
+| 4 | nainom | 2 |
+| 5 | pannakarimon | 2 |
+| 6 | kannabinoide | 2 |
+| 7 | agsarsarua | 2 |
+| 8 | alingget | 2 |
+| 9 | emetopilia | 2 |
+| 10 | emetopobia | 2 |
+
+### Zipf's Law Analysis
+
+| Metric | Value |
+|--------|-------|
+| Zipf Coefficient | 1.0920 |
+| R² (Goodness of Fit) | 0.998298 |
+| Adherence Quality | **excellent** |
+
+### Coverage Analysis
+
+| Top N Words | Coverage |
+|-------------|----------|
+| Top 100 | 53.3% |
+| Top 1,000 | 74.1% |
+| Top 5,000 | 86.4% |
+| Top 10,000 | 91.0% |
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Zipf Compliance:** R²=0.9983 indicates excellent adherence to Zipf's law
+- **High Frequency Dominance:** Top 100 words cover 53.3% of corpus
+- **Long Tail:** 50,623 words needed for remaining 9.0% coverage
+
+---
+## 5. Word Embeddings Evaluation
+
+![Embedding Isotropy](visualizations/embedding_isotropy.png)
+
+![Similarity Matrix](visualizations/embedding_similarity.png)
+
+![t-SNE Words](visualizations/tsne_words.png)
+
+![t-SNE Sentences](visualizations/tsne_sentences.png)
+
+
+### 5.1 Cross-Lingual Alignment
+
+![Alignment Quality](visualizations/embedding_alignment_quality.png)
+
+![Multilingual t-SNE](visualizations/embedding_tsne_multilingual.png)
+
+
+### 5.2 Model Comparison
+
+| Model | Dimension | Isotropy | Semantic Density | Alignment R@1 | Alignment R@10 |
+|-------|-----------|----------|------------------|---------------|----------------|
+| **mono_32d** | 32 | 0.8576 🏆 | 0.3336 | N/A | N/A |
+| **mono_64d** | 64 | 0.8049 | 0.2671 | N/A | N/A |
+| **mono_128d** | 128 | 0.6566 | 0.2245 | N/A | N/A |
+| **aligned_32d** | 32 | 0.8576 | 0.3327 | 0.1020 | 0.4140 |
+| **aligned_64d** | 64 | 0.8049 | 0.2687 | 0.1940 | 0.5560 |
+| **aligned_128d** | 128 | 0.6566 | 0.2322 | 0.2440 | 0.6020 |
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Isotropy:** mono_32d with 0.8576 (more uniform distribution)
+- **Semantic Density:** Average pairwise similarity of 0.2765. Lower values indicate better semantic separation.
+- **Alignment Quality:** Aligned models achieve up to 24.4% R@1 in cross-lingual retrieval.
+- **Recommendation:** 128d aligned for best cross-lingual performance
+
+---
+## 6.  Morphological Analysis (Experimental)
+
+This section presents an automated morphological analysis derived from the statistical divergence between word-level and subword-level models. By analyzing where subword predictability spikes and where word-level coverage fails, we can infer linguistic structures without supervised data.
+
+### 6.1 Productivity & Complexity
+
+| Metric | Value | Interpretation | Recommendation |
+|--------|-------|----------------|----------------|
+| Productivity Index | **5.000** | High morphological productivity | Reliable analysis |
+| Idiomaticity Gap | **-0.203** | Low formulaic content | - |
+
+### 6.2 Affix Inventory (Productive Units)
+
+These are the most productive prefixes and suffixes identified by sampling the vocabulary for global substitutability patterns. A unit is considered an affix if stripping it leaves a valid stem that appears in other contexts.
+
+#### Productive Prefixes
+| Prefix | Examples |
+|--------|----------|
+| `-ma` | magnificent, matapos, mackinven |
+| `-a` | abc, annonaceae, agtengtenggel |
+| `-s` | saklawen, segregate, sinaugoro |
+| `-na` | naipagpagarup, naipabaro, na2o |
+| `-pa` | pagsasaoe, pait, pannakamatmati |
+| `-b` | basle, bisitaen, begawan |
+| `-ka` | katres, kalidasa, kababa |
+| `-p` | pisinniflora, pagsasaoe, puesto |
+
+#### Productive Suffixes
+| Suffix | Examples |
+|--------|----------|
+| `-a` | curia, pisinniflora, daremdemda |
+| `-n` | saklawen, positron, tatalan |
+| `-o` | kodigo, naipabaro, puesto |
+| `-s` | katres, matapos, oxus |
+| `-an` | tatalan, begawan, tinwtawagan |
+| `-na` | lehitimadona, pinarmekna, arrubayanna |
+| `-e` | me, rourke, pagsasaoe |
+| `-g` | temburong, dulong, aliping |
+
+### 6.3 Bound Stems (Lexical Roots)
+
+Bound stems are high-frequency subword units that are semantically cohesive but rarely appear as standalone words. These often correspond to the 'core' of a word that requires inflection or derivation to be valid.
+
+| Stem | Cohesion | Substitutability | Examples |
+|------|----------|------------------|----------|
+| `angi` | 1.91x | 71 contexts | angin, mangi, sangi |
+| `dayt` | 2.60x | 17 contexts | dayty, dayta, dayto |
+| `sion` | 1.93x | 43 contexts | pasion, bision, sesion |
+| `asao` | 2.34x | 20 contexts | masao, sasao, wasao |
+| `adag` | 2.23x | 21 contexts | nadag, adaga, kadagit |
+| `ngga` | 1.78x | 42 contexts | ingga, anggal, rongga |
+| `agsa` | 1.61x | 53 contexts | agsao, agsapa, bagsak |
+| `aipa` | 1.65x | 41 contexts | naipa, maipa, taipa |
+| `aika` | 1.76x | 29 contexts | maika, baikal, taikat |
+| `abag` | 1.76x | 27 contexts | tabag, abaga, kabag |
+| `abae` | 1.92x | 20 contexts | babae, babaen, ababaen |
+| `silp` | 2.05x | 16 contexts | silpo, isilpo, insilpo |
+
+### 6.4 Affix Compatibility (Co-occurrence)
+
+This table shows which prefixes and suffixes most frequently co-occur on the same stems, revealing the 'stacking' rules of the language's morphology.
+
+| Prefix | Suffix | Frequency | Examples |
+|--------|--------|-----------|----------|
+| `-na` | `-n` | 142 words | naminduan, nailawlawagan |
+| `-pa` | `-n` | 123 words | pasuruan, patubuan |
+| `-pa` | `-a` | 122 words | pannakakita, pagsinaenna |
+| `-a` | `-a` | 117 words | agrepresenta, agdumaduma |
+| `-na` | `-a` | 108 words | naipatulodda, nailata |
+| `-na` | `-an` | 105 words | naminduan, nailawlawagan |
+| `-s` | `-a` | 98 words | sinasina, sanana |
+| `-pa` | `-an` | 97 words | pasuruan, patubuan |
+| `-b` | `-a` | 85 words | biskleta, bella |
+| `-ma` | `-a` | 83 words | malabarica, maipanunotanda |
+
+### 6.5 Recursive Morpheme Segmentation
+
+Using **Recursive Hierarchical Substitutability**, we decompose complex words into their constituent morphemes. This approach handles nested affixes (e.g., `prefix-prefix-root-suffix`).
+
+| Word | Suggested Split | Confidence | Stem |
+|------|-----------------|------------|------|
+| kalatakanna | **`kalatak-an-na`** | 7.5 | `an` |
+| manggandat | **`manggan-da-t`** | 7.5 | `da` |
+| matarigagay | **`matariga-g-ay`** | 7.5 | `g` |
+| cavacoana | **`cavaco-an-a`** | 7.5 | `an` |
+| nagunggunaan | **`nagunggu-na-an`** | 7.5 | `na` |
+| gungunana | **`gungun-an-a`** | 7.5 | `an` |
+| khoonmengiana | **`khoonmengi-an-a`** | 7.5 | `an` |
+| kutubuano | **`kutubu-an-o`** | 7.5 | `an` |
+| resultana | **`result-an-a`** | 7.5 | `an` |
+| pransiskano | **`pransisk-an-o`** | 7.5 | `an` |
+| stephanus | **`steph-an-us`** | 7.5 | `an` |
+| tanghalan | **`tangh-al-an`** | 7.5 | `al` |
+| mabaeoides | **`mabaeoi-d-es`** | 7.5 | `d` |
+| kabasalan | **`kabas-al-an`** | 7.5 | `al` |
+| binukbukodanna | **`binukbukod-an-na`** | 7.5 | `an` |
+
+### 6.6 Linguistic Interpretation
+
+> **Automated Insight:**
+The language Iloko shows high morphological productivity. The subword models are significantly more efficient than word models, suggesting a rich system of affixation or compounding.
+
+---
+## 7. Summary & Recommendations
+
+![Performance Dashboard](visualizations/performance_dashboard.png)
+
+### Production Recommendations
+
+| Component | Recommended | Rationale |
+|-----------|-------------|-----------|
+| Tokenizer | **64k BPE** | Best compression (4.54x) |
+| N-gram | **2-gram** | Lowest perplexity (205) |
+| Markov | **Context-4** | Highest predictability (93.0%) |
+| Embeddings | **100d** | Balanced semantic capture and isotropy |
+
+
+---
+## Appendix: Metrics Glossary & Interpretation Guide
+
+This section provides definitions, intuitions, and guidance for interpreting the metrics used throughout this report.
+
+### Tokenizer Metrics
+
+**Compression Ratio**
+> *Definition:* The ratio of characters to tokens (chars/token). Measures how efficiently the tokenizer represents text.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Higher compression means fewer tokens needed to represent the same text, reducing sequence lengths for downstream models. A 3x compression means ~3 characters per token on average.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Higher is generally better for efficiency, but extremely high compression may indicate overly aggressive merging that loses morphological information.
+
+**Average Token Length (Fertility)**
+> *Definition:* Mean number of characters per token produced by the tokenizer.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Reflects the granularity of tokenization. Longer tokens capture more context but may struggle with rare words; shorter tokens are more flexible but increase sequence length.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Balance between 2-5 characters for most languages. Arabic/morphologically-rich languages may benefit from slightly longer tokens.
+
+**Unknown Token Rate (OOV Rate)**
+> *Definition:* Percentage of tokens that map to the unknown/UNK token, indicating words the tokenizer cannot represent.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Lower OOV means better vocabulary coverage. High OOV indicates the tokenizer encounters many unseen character sequences.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Below 1% is excellent; below 5% is acceptable. BPE tokenizers typically achieve very low OOV due to subword fallback.
+
+### N-gram Model Metrics
+
+**Perplexity**
+> *Definition:* Measures how "surprised" the model is by test data. Mathematically: 2^(cross-entropy). Lower values indicate better prediction.
+>
+> *Intuition:* If perplexity is 100, the model is as uncertain as if choosing uniformly among 100 options at each step. A perplexity of 10 means effectively choosing among 10 equally likely options.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Lower is better. Perplexity decreases with larger n-grams (more context). Values vary widely by language and corpus size.
+
+**Entropy**
+> *Definition:* Average information content (in bits) needed to encode the next token given the context. Related to perplexity: perplexity = 2^entropy.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High entropy means high uncertainty/randomness; low entropy means predictable patterns. Natural language typically has entropy between 1-4 bits per character.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Lower entropy indicates more predictable text patterns. Entropy should decrease as n-gram size increases.
+
+**Coverage (Top-K)**
+> *Definition:* Percentage of corpus occurrences explained by the top K most frequent n-grams.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High coverage with few patterns indicates repetitive/formulaic text; low coverage suggests diverse vocabulary usage.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Depends on use case. For language modeling, moderate coverage (40-60% with top-1000) is typical for natural text.
+
+### Markov Chain Metrics
+
+**Average Entropy**
+> *Definition:* Mean entropy across all contexts, measuring average uncertainty in next-word prediction.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Lower entropy means the model is more confident about what comes next. Context-1 has high entropy (many possible next words); Context-4 has low entropy (few likely continuations).
+>
+> *What to seek:* Decreasing entropy with larger context sizes. Very low entropy (<0.1) indicates highly deterministic transitions.
+
+**Branching Factor**
+> *Definition:* Average number of unique next tokens observed for each context.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High branching = many possible continuations (flexible but uncertain); low branching = few options (predictable but potentially repetitive).
+>
+> *What to seek:* Branching factor should decrease with context size. Values near 1.0 indicate nearly deterministic chains.
+
+**Predictability**
+> *Definition:* Derived metric: (1 - normalized_entropy) × 100%. Indicates how deterministic the model's predictions are.
+>
+> *Intuition:* 100% predictability means the next word is always certain; 0% means completely random. Real text falls between these extremes.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Higher predictability for text generation quality, but too high (>98%) may produce repetitive output.
+
+### Vocabulary & Zipf's Law Metrics
+
+**Zipf's Coefficient**
+> *Definition:* The slope of the log-log plot of word frequency vs. rank. Zipf's law predicts this should be approximately -1.
+>
+> *Intuition:* A coefficient near -1 indicates the corpus follows natural language patterns where a few words are very common and most words are rare.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Values between -0.8 and -1.2 indicate healthy natural language distribution. Deviations may suggest domain-specific or artificial text.
+
+**R² (Coefficient of Determination)**
+> *Definition:* Measures how well the linear fit explains the frequency-rank relationship. Ranges from 0 to 1.
+>
+> *Intuition:* R² near 1.0 means the data closely follows Zipf's law; lower values indicate deviation from expected word frequency patterns.
+>
+> *What to seek:* R² > 0.95 is excellent; > 0.99 indicates near-perfect Zipf adherence typical of large natural corpora.
+
+**Vocabulary Coverage**
+> *Definition:* Cumulative percentage of corpus tokens accounted for by the top N words.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Shows how concentrated word usage is. If top-100 words cover 50% of text, the corpus relies heavily on common words.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Top-100 covering 30-50% is typical. Higher coverage indicates more repetitive text; lower suggests richer vocabulary.
+
+### Word Embedding Metrics
+
+**Isotropy**
+> *Definition:* Measures how uniformly distributed vectors are in the embedding space. Computed as the ratio of minimum to maximum singular values.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High isotropy (near 1.0) means vectors spread evenly in all directions; low isotropy means vectors cluster in certain directions, reducing expressiveness.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Higher isotropy generally indicates better-quality embeddings. Values > 0.1 are reasonable; > 0.3 is good. Lower-dimensional embeddings tend to have higher isotropy.
+
+**Average Norm**
+> *Definition:* Mean magnitude (L2 norm) of word vectors in the embedding space.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Indicates the typical "length" of vectors. Consistent norms suggest stable training; high variance may indicate some words are undertrained.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Relatively consistent norms across models. The absolute value matters less than consistency (low std deviation).
+
+**Cosine Similarity**
+> *Definition:* Measures angular similarity between vectors, ranging from -1 (opposite) to 1 (identical direction).
+>
+> *Intuition:* Words with similar meanings should have high cosine similarity. This is the standard metric for semantic relatedness in embeddings.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Semantically related words should score > 0.5; unrelated words should be near 0. Synonyms often score > 0.7.
+
+**t-SNE Visualization**
+> *Definition:* t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding - a dimensionality reduction technique that preserves local structure for visualization.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Clusters in t-SNE plots indicate groups of semantically related words. Spread indicates vocabulary diversity; tight clusters suggest semantic coherence.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Meaningful clusters (e.g., numbers together, verbs together). Avoid over-interpreting distances - t-SNE preserves local, not global, structure.
+
+### General Interpretation Guidelines
+
+1. **Compare within model families:** Metrics are most meaningful when comparing models of the same type (e.g., 8k vs 64k tokenizer).
+2. **Consider trade-offs:** Better performance on one metric often comes at the cost of another (e.g., compression vs. OOV rate).
+3. **Context matters:** Optimal values depend on downstream tasks. Text generation may prioritize different metrics than classification.
+4. **Corpus influence:** All metrics are influenced by corpus characteristics. Wikipedia text differs from social media or literature.
+5. **Language-specific patterns:** Morphologically rich languages (like Arabic) may show different optimal ranges than analytic languages.
+
+
+### Visualizations Index
+
+| Visualization | Description |
+|---------------|-------------|
+| Tokenizer Compression | Compression ratios by vocabulary size |
+| Tokenizer Fertility | Average token length by vocabulary |
+| Tokenizer OOV | Unknown token rates |
+| Tokenizer Total Tokens | Total tokens by vocabulary |
+| N-gram Perplexity | Perplexity by n-gram size |
+| N-gram Entropy | Entropy by n-gram size |
+| N-gram Coverage | Top pattern coverage |
+| N-gram Unique | Unique n-gram counts |
+| Markov Entropy | Entropy by context size |
+| Markov Branching | Branching factor by context |
+| Markov Contexts | Unique context counts |
+| Zipf's Law | Frequency-rank distribution with fit |
+| Vocab Frequency | Word frequency distribution |
+| Top 20 Words | Most frequent words |
+| Vocab Coverage | Cumulative coverage curve |
+| Embedding Isotropy | Vector space uniformity |
+| Embedding Norms | Vector magnitude distribution |
+| Embedding Similarity | Word similarity heatmap |
+| Nearest Neighbors | Similar words for key terms |
+| t-SNE Words | 2D word embedding visualization |
+| t-SNE Sentences | 2D sentence embedding visualization |
+| Position Encoding | Encoding method comparison |
+| Model Sizes | Storage requirements |
+| Performance Dashboard | Comprehensive performance overview |
+
+---
+## About This Project
+
+### Data Source
+
+Models trained on [wikipedia-monthly](https://huggingface.co/datasets/omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly) - a monthly snapshot of Wikipedia articles across 300+ languages.
+
+### Project
+
+A project by **[Wikilangs](https://wikilangs.org)** - Open-source NLP models for every Wikipedia language.
+
+### Maintainer
+
+[Omar Kamali](https://omarkamali.com) - [Omneity Labs](https://omneitylabs.com)
+
+### Citation
+
+If you use these models in your research, please cite:
+
+```bibtex
+@misc{wikilangs2025,
+  author = {Kamali, Omar},
+  title = {Wikilangs: Open NLP Models for Wikipedia Languages},
+  year = {2025},
+  doi = {10.5281/zenodo.18073153},
+  publisher = {Zenodo},
+  url = {https://huggingface.co/wikilangs}
+  institution = {Omneity Labs}
+}
+```
+
+### License
+
+MIT License - Free for academic and commercial use.
+
+### Links
+
+- 🌐 Website: [wikilangs.org](https://wikilangs.org)
+- 🤗 Models: [huggingface.co/wikilangs](https://huggingface.co/wikilangs)
+- 📊 Data: [wikipedia-monthly](https://huggingface.co/datasets/omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly)
+- 👤 Author: [Omar Kamali](https://huggingface.co/omarkamali)
+- 🤝 Sponsor: [Featherless AI](https://featherless.ai)
+---
+*Generated by Wikilangs Models Pipeline*
+
+*Report Date: 2026-01-10 04:17:29*

models/embeddings/aligned/ilo_128d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:301aa2651c169f06eb4e928c79a3d3d6771f3a091083094ecac2e48b7813c233
+size 1054703922

models/embeddings/aligned/ilo_128d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "ilo", "dim": 128, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": true}

models/embeddings/aligned/ilo_128d.projection.npy

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:c0f9a9424aceb5eba24276bad593d6405ca08a336c86139030481c985ef573ce
+size 65664

models/embeddings/aligned/ilo_128d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+{
+  "language": "ilo",
+  "dimension": 128,
+  "version": "aligned",
+  "hub_language": "en",
+  "seed_vocab_size": 13566,
+  "vocab_size": 29484
+}

models/embeddings/aligned/ilo_32d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:2a7a55a10a9f07d84d534c92d0fbc3098dee487326ac1aad7f4dc05441aeb50a
+size 264060210

models/embeddings/aligned/ilo_32d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "ilo", "dim": 32, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": true}

models/embeddings/aligned/ilo_32d.projection.npy

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:702ac4a96f454816c98dba3be2af856acea12871554bb79bde91974e4934679a
+size 4224

models/embeddings/aligned/ilo_32d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+{
+  "language": "ilo",
+  "dimension": 32,
+  "version": "aligned",
+  "hub_language": "en",
+  "seed_vocab_size": 13566,
+  "vocab_size": 29484
+}

models/embeddings/aligned/ilo_64d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:a6c24f610f93518cdc92bc3cc325a01ba17bce8971f223f6bdea4cee26c14f58
+size 527608114

models/embeddings/aligned/ilo_64d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "ilo", "dim": 64, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": true}

models/embeddings/aligned/ilo_64d.projection.npy

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:379a9f5b504ae872ebbe11d652feb0c6a6062508759243ce39ed5e80846ef55d
+size 16512

models/embeddings/aligned/ilo_64d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+{
+  "language": "ilo",
+  "dimension": 64,
+  "version": "aligned",
+  "hub_language": "en",
+  "seed_vocab_size": 13566,
+  "vocab_size": 29484
+}

models/embeddings/monolingual/ilo_128d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:301aa2651c169f06eb4e928c79a3d3d6771f3a091083094ecac2e48b7813c233
+size 1054703922

models/embeddings/monolingual/ilo_128d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "ilo", "dim": 128, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": false}

models/embeddings/monolingual/ilo_128d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+{
+  "language": "ilo",
+  "dimension": 128,
+  "version": "monolingual",
+  "training_params": {
+    "algorithm": "skipgram",
+    "min_count": 5,
+    "window": 5,
+    "negative": 5,
+    "epochs": 5,
+    "encoding_method": "rope",
+    "dim": 128,
+    "threads": 5
+  },
+  "vocab_size": 29484
+}

models/embeddings/monolingual/ilo_32d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:2a7a55a10a9f07d84d534c92d0fbc3098dee487326ac1aad7f4dc05441aeb50a
+size 264060210

models/embeddings/monolingual/ilo_32d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "ilo", "dim": 32, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": false}

models/embeddings/monolingual/ilo_32d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+{
+  "language": "ilo",
+  "dimension": 32,
+  "version": "monolingual",
+  "training_params": {
+    "algorithm": "skipgram",
+    "min_count": 5,
+    "window": 5,
+    "negative": 5,
+    "epochs": 5,
+    "encoding_method": "rope",
+    "dim": 32,
+    "threads": 5
+  },
+  "vocab_size": 29484
+}

models/embeddings/monolingual/ilo_64d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:a6c24f610f93518cdc92bc3cc325a01ba17bce8971f223f6bdea4cee26c14f58
+size 527608114

models/embeddings/monolingual/ilo_64d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "ilo", "dim": 64, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": false}

models/embeddings/monolingual/ilo_64d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+{
+  "language": "ilo",
+  "dimension": 64,
+  "version": "monolingual",
+  "training_params": {
+    "algorithm": "skipgram",
+    "min_count": 5,
+    "window": 5,
+    "negative": 5,
+    "epochs": 5,
+    "encoding_method": "rope",
+    "dim": 64,
+    "threads": 5
+  },
+  "vocab_size": 29484
+}

models/subword_markov/ilo_markov_ctx1_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:2e5901e088c0fcde62593e9779e10f1097586bb09362f1cef84c0d0f7d30015d
+size 111759

models/subword_markov/ilo_markov_ctx1_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 1,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "ilo",
+  "unique_contexts": 2636,
+  "total_transitions": 15252215
+}

models/subword_markov/ilo_markov_ctx2_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:120b4dbc0ed3a176da548a7120a92d819806ce2287cd9791341c2c7e7da8c388
+size 539751

models/subword_markov/ilo_markov_ctx2_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 2,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "ilo",
+  "unique_contexts": 13337,
+  "total_transitions": 15236834
+}

models/subword_markov/ilo_markov_ctx3_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:133d8c4e5c3120ace1a97c2251ca100debeb63ad355dc3e4a87a45b0f36878e8
+size 1905503

models/subword_markov/ilo_markov_ctx3_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 3,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "ilo",
+  "unique_contexts": 59341,
+  "total_transitions": 15221453
+}

models/subword_markov/ilo_markov_ctx4_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:0112f1378eaed32883e1b9bd43cc57061b9f22168d4c07eefbb7195ab814a46f
+size 5527370

models/subword_markov/ilo_markov_ctx4_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 4,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "ilo",
+  "unique_contexts": 247602,
+  "total_transitions": 15206072
+}

models/subword_ngram/ilo_2gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:49748896b8103fbd58bad76eacbcfa179840f6e91094adbe773a3f20845b5ac6
+size 51171

models/subword_ngram/ilo_2gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 2,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "ilo",
+  "unique_ngrams": 3758,
+  "total_ngrams": 15252215
+}

models/subword_ngram/ilo_3gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:8a4a19c2fae7cacd7105faeac9029446b59f17228d0be933af4a1682f6b1feb3
+size 347156

models/subword_ngram/ilo_3gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 3,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "ilo",
+  "unique_ngrams": 27777,
+  "total_ngrams": 15236834
+}

models/subword_ngram/ilo_4gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:e56d9bd678802d3d06700751dbe8c9ebf9c6a3ec37d5b6b3b58dda40dc0a68ef
+size 1656110

models/subword_ngram/ilo_4gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 4,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "ilo",
+  "unique_ngrams": 148845,
+  "total_ngrams": 15221453
+}

models/subword_ngram/ilo_5gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:38003ae4dcc3979a4fd0972b1d893ba3df7ae106d8376bde42326f557b5b277b
+size 4337115

models/subword_ngram/ilo_5gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 5,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "ilo",
+  "unique_ngrams": 384749,
+  "total_ngrams": 15206072
+}

models/tokenizer/ilo_tokenizer_16k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:b4be7137f1025d315e29a14f15b85c3f084bfee375f62461cd44e0dbe5735215
+size 508161

models/tokenizer/ilo_tokenizer_32k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:20a03dc254595747743a4f8cdc3702c372b29a424481455b4e9584857f15e816
+size 783079

models/tokenizer/ilo_tokenizer_64k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:44d5b38c6b5543a4165ca04e6d510d4207901fb0a820efcb10e0d26da79c8c78
+size 1342952

models/tokenizer/ilo_tokenizer_8k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:16229b6a33c746d84bcd21eb8ff2a936ea82a43962fa03cb11638f9d62d6a21b
+size 373260

models/vocabulary/ilo_vocabulary.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:cf2f118e48859a7f74401049c1e98409e41815fcb145b43900ce2f7a2c9b9ad5
+size 1068316

models/vocabulary/ilo_vocabulary_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+{
+  "language": "ilo",
+  "vocabulary_size": 60623,
+  "variant": "full",
+  "statistics": {
+    "type_token_ratio": 0.056009884168389056,
+    "coverage": {
+      "top_100": 0.5164679668075234,
+      "top_1000": 0.7176416916352442,
+      "top_5000": 0.8366671829797395,
+      "top_10000": 0.8814682330314515
+    },
+    "hapax_count": 78232,
+    "hapax_ratio": 0.5634078715206511,
+    "total_documents": 15381
+  }
+}