Upload all models and assets for jam (latest)

.gitattributes

@@ -33,3 +33,10 @@ saved_model/**/* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *.zip filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *.zst filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *tfevents* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/embedding_similarity.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/embedding_tsne_multilingual.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/performance_dashboard.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/position_encoding_comparison.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/tsne_sentences.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/tsne_words.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/zipf_law.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text

README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,771 @@
+---
+language: jam
+language_name: Jamaican Creole English
+language_family: germanic_west_anglofrisian
+tags:
+  - wikilangs
+  - nlp
+  - tokenizer
+  - embeddings
+  - n-gram
+  - markov
+  - wikipedia
+  - feature-extraction
+  - sentence-similarity
+  - tokenization
+  - n-grams
+  - markov-chain
+  - text-mining
+  - fasttext
+  - babelvec
+  - vocabulous
+  - vocabulary
+  - monolingual
+  - family-germanic_west_anglofrisian
+license: mit
+library_name: wikilangs
+pipeline_tag: text-generation
+datasets:
+  - omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly
+dataset_info:
+  name: wikipedia-monthly
+  description: Monthly snapshots of Wikipedia articles across 300+ languages
+metrics:
+  - name: best_compression_ratio
+    type: compression
+    value: 4.524
+  - name: best_isotropy
+    type: isotropy
+    value: 0.1451
+  - name: vocabulary_size
+    type: vocab
+    value: 0
+generated: 2026-01-10
+---
+
+# Jamaican Creole English - Wikilangs Models
+## Comprehensive Research Report & Full Ablation Study
+
+This repository contains NLP models trained and evaluated by Wikilangs, specifically on **Jamaican Creole English** Wikipedia data.
+We analyze tokenizers, n-gram models, Markov chains, vocabulary statistics, and word embeddings.
+
+## 📋 Repository Contents
+
+### Models & Assets
+
+- Tokenizers (8k, 16k, 32k, 64k)
+- N-gram models (2, 3, 4, 5-gram)
+- Markov chains (context of 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5)
+- Subword N-gram and Markov chains
+- Embeddings in various sizes and dimensions (aligned and unaligned)
+- Language Vocabulary
+- Language Statistics
+
+![Performance Dashboard](visualizations/performance_dashboard.png)
+
+### Analysis and Evaluation
+
+- [1. Tokenizer Evaluation](#1-tokenizer-evaluation)
+- [2. N-gram Model Evaluation](#2-n-gram-model-evaluation)
+- [3. Markov Chain Evaluation](#3-markov-chain-evaluation)
+- [4. Vocabulary Analysis](#4-vocabulary-analysis)
+- [5. Word Embeddings Evaluation](#5-word-embeddings-evaluation)
+- [6. Morphological Analysis (Experimental)](#6--morphological-analysis-experimental)
+- [7. Summary & Recommendations](#7-summary--recommendations)
+- [Metrics Glossary](#appendix-metrics-glossary--interpretation-guide)
+- [Visualizations Index](#visualizations-index)
+
+---
+## 1. Tokenizer Evaluation
+
+![Tokenizer Compression](visualizations/tokenizer_compression.png)
+
+![Tokenizer Fertility](visualizations/tokenizer_fertility.png)
+
+![Tokenizer OOV](visualizations/tokenizer_oov.png)
+
+![Total Tokens](visualizations/tokenizer_total_tokens.png)
+
+### Results
+
+| Vocab Size | Compression | Avg Token Len | UNK Rate | Total Tokens |
+|------------|-------------|---------------|----------|--------------|
+| **8k** | 3.852x | 3.86 | 0.1007% | 191,616 |
+| **16k** | 4.204x | 4.21 | 0.1099% | 175,540 |
+| **32k** | 4.524x 🏆 | 4.53 | 0.1183% | 163,136 |
+
+### Tokenization Examples
+
+Below are sample sentences tokenized with each vocabulary size:
+
+**Sample 1:** `David Guetta (riil niem: Pierre David Guetta; baan 7 Novemba a Paris) a wah Fren...`
+
+| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
+|-------|--------|-------|
+| 8k | `▁david ▁gu et ta ▁( ri il ▁niem : ▁pier ... (+26 more)` | 36 |
+| 16k | `▁david ▁guetta ▁( riil ▁niem : ▁pierre ▁david ▁guetta ; ... (+18 more)` | 28 |
+| 32k | `▁david ▁guetta ▁( riil ▁niem : ▁pierre ▁david ▁guetta ; ... (+18 more)` | 28 |
+
+**Sample 2:** `AnuovaHannover 100px Kantinent YuuropNieshan JoermaniParish 204.14 km² Anuova (J...`
+
+| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
+|-------|--------|-------|
+| 8k | `▁an uov ah ann over ▁ 1 0 0 px ... (+36 more)` | 46 |
+| 16k | `▁an uov ah ann over ▁ 1 0 0 px ... (+34 more)` | 44 |
+| 32k | `▁anuovahann over ▁ 1 0 0 px ▁kantinent ▁yuuropnieshan ▁joerman ... (+29 more)` | 39 |
+
+**Sample 3:** `Jumiekan lichicha intanashinali rinoun, wid di ailan a Jumieka biin di uom ar bo...`
+
+| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
+|-------|--------|-------|
+| 8k | `▁jumiekan ▁lichicha ▁intanashinali ▁rin oun , ▁wid ▁di ▁ailan ▁a ... (+12 more)` | 22 |
+| 16k | `▁jumiekan ▁lichicha ▁intanashinali ▁rinoun , ▁wid ▁di ▁ailan ▁a ▁jumieka ... (+11 more)` | 21 |
+| 32k | `▁jumiekan ▁lichicha ▁intanashinali ▁rinoun , ▁wid ▁di ▁ailan ▁a ▁jumieka ... (+11 more)` | 21 |
+
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Compression:** 32k achieves 4.524x compression
+- **Lowest UNK Rate:** 8k with 0.1007% unknown tokens
+- **Trade-off:** Larger vocabularies improve compression but increase model size
+- **Recommendation:** 32k vocabulary provides optimal balance for production use
+
+---
+## 2. N-gram Model Evaluation
+
+![N-gram Perplexity](visualizations/ngram_perplexity.png)
+
+![N-gram Unique](visualizations/ngram_unique.png)
+
+![N-gram Coverage](visualizations/ngram_coverage.png)
+
+### Results
+
+| N-gram | Variant | Perplexity | Entropy | Unique N-grams | Top-100 Coverage | Top-1000 Coverage |
+|--------|---------|------------|---------|----------------|------------------|-------------------|
+| **2-gram** | Word | 1,541 | 10.59 | 3,741 | 32.5% | 65.9% |
+| **2-gram** | Subword | 238 🏆 | 7.89 | 1,403 | 70.0% | 99.7% |
+| **3-gram** | Word | 1,509 | 10.56 | 3,102 | 32.2% | 65.7% |
+| **3-gram** | Subword | 1,861 | 10.86 | 9,633 | 27.4% | 74.4% |
+| **4-gram** | Word | 1,686 | 10.72 | 4,165 | 32.5% | 55.5% |
+| **4-gram** | Subword | 9,243 | 13.17 | 41,304 | 13.9% | 41.0% |
+| **5-gram** | Word | 591 | 9.21 | 2,198 | 46.6% | 71.4% |
+| **5-gram** | Subword | 25,412 | 14.63 | 84,144 | 8.7% | 26.9% |
+
+### Top 5 N-grams by Size
+
+**2-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `a di` | 2,702 |
+| 2 | `ina di` | 1,423 |
+| 3 | `tu di` | 748 |
+| 4 | `a wah` | 541 |
+| 5 | `ah di` | 470 |
+
+**3-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `askaadn tu di` | 213 |
+| 2 | `wan a di` | 194 |
+| 3 | `tu di sensos` | 193 |
+| 4 | `di pravins a` | 187 |
+| 5 | `kiastiil ahn león` | 185 |
+
+**4-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `askaadn tu di sensos` | 193 |
+| 2 | `kiastiil ahn león spien` | 184 |
+| 3 | `ina di pravins a` | 183 |
+| 4 | `di pravins a soria` | 183 |
+| 5 | `spien askaadn tu di` | 182 |
+
+**5-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `ine di miunisipaliti ab papyulieshan` | 182 |
+| 2 | `sensos ine di miunisipaliti ab` | 182 |
+| 3 | `di sensos ine di miunisipaliti` | 182 |
+| 4 | `tu di sensos ine di` | 182 |
+| 5 | `askaadn tu di sensos ine` | 182 |
+
+**2-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `_ a` | 29,684 |
+| 2 | `a _` | 25,927 |
+| 3 | `i _` | 25,474 |
+| 4 | `a n` | 21,538 |
+| 5 | `_ d` | 20,084 |
+
+**3-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `_ d i` | 15,507 |
+| 2 | `d i _` | 13,620 |
+| 3 | `_ a _` | 10,852 |
+| 4 | `a n _` | 8,698 |
+| 5 | `a h _` | 7,964 |
+
+**4-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `_ d i _` | 12,752 |
+| 2 | `a _ d i` | 5,069 |
+| 3 | `_ a h _` | 4,411 |
+| 4 | `_ i n a` | 4,365 |
+| 5 | `i n a _` | 4,360 |
+
+**5-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `a _ d i _` | 4,702 |
+| 2 | `_ i n a _` | 4,109 |
+| 3 | `_ a _ d i` | 2,835 |
+| 4 | `s h a n _` | 2,596 |
+| 5 | `e s h a n` | 2,001 |
+
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Perplexity:** 2-gram (subword) with 238
+- **Entropy Trend:** Decreases with larger n-grams (more predictable)
+- **Coverage:** Top-1000 patterns cover ~27% of corpus
+- **Recommendation:** 4-gram or 5-gram for best predictive performance
+
+---
+## 3. Markov Chain Evaluation
+
+![Markov Entropy](visualizations/markov_entropy.png)
+
+![Markov Contexts](visualizations/markov_contexts.png)
+
+![Markov Branching](visualizations/markov_branching.png)
+
+### Results
+
+| Context | Variant | Avg Entropy | Perplexity | Branching Factor | Unique Contexts | Predictability |
+|---------|---------|-------------|------------|------------------|-----------------|----------------|
+| **1** | Word | 0.8259 | 1.773 | 4.61 | 23,902 | 17.4% |
+| **1** | Subword | 0.9178 | 1.889 | 6.25 | 632 | 8.2% |
+| **2** | Word | 0.2166 | 1.162 | 1.43 | 109,227 | 78.3% |
+| **2** | Subword | 0.9098 | 1.879 | 5.02 | 3,949 | 9.0% |
+| **3** | Word | 0.0581 | 1.041 | 1.09 | 155,360 | 94.2% |
+| **3** | Subword | 0.8329 | 1.781 | 3.69 | 19,800 | 16.7% |
+| **4** | Word | 0.0168 🏆 | 1.012 | 1.02 | 167,194 | 98.3% |
+| **4** | Subword | 0.6241 | 1.541 | 2.48 | 72,952 | 37.6% |
+
+### Generated Text Samples (Word-based)
+
+Below are text samples generated from each word-based Markov chain model:
+
+**Context Size 1:**
+
+1. `di tuu taip fi di standad tex ahn staavieshan ahn florida ina wol 93 6 october`
+2. `a chriiti nachrali kaaz bai deh riyolajikal prapati raits gruup a di chanspuot infrachokcha we no`
+3. `ah kom a review of america otherwise extoernal duona an ina piepal basilika a eni memba`
+
+**Context Size 2:**
+
+1. `a di 63 siit ina paaliment yet di riil sakratiiz laka nof languij elefen distingguish kountebl ah`
+2. `ina di naat ahn lan pahn di kraas fi di buk we im du wehn put tigeda`
+3. `tu di yuuman vais ina ar wok jinarali inten fi bi a kaman kuol ah ud ah`
+
+**Context Size 3:**
+
+1. `askaadn tu di sensos ine di miunisipaliti ab papyulieshan a 53 inabitant a soria category jaagrafi`
+2. `wan a di yonggis mongx di mieja wol rilijan wid uoba 2 4 bilian adierent nuo az kristian`
+3. `tu di sensos ine di miunisipaliti ab papyulieshan a 28 inabitant a soria category jaagrafi`
+
+**Context Size 4:**
+
+1. `askaadn tu di sensos di siti ab a papyulieshan a 17 865 piipl`
+2. `kiastiil ahn león spien askaadn tu di sensos ine di miunisipaliti ab papyulieshan a 114 inabitant a ...`
+3. `di pravins a soria kiastiil ahn león spien askaadn tu di sensos di toun ab a papyulieshan a 2`
+
+
+### Generated Text Samples (Subword-based)
+
+Below are text samples generated from each subword-based Markov chain model:
+
+**Context Size 1:**
+
+1. `_(miesorish_pren`
+2. `aash_pr_seng_kop`
+3. `ip_ti_ma_tatiuse`
+
+**Context Size 2:**
+
+1. `_a_a_fahn_kos_a_d`
+2. `a_di_frailica"._w`
+3. `i_menis_jaid_an_a`
+
+**Context Size 3:**
+
+1. `_di_bot_ar_i,_ada_`
+2. `di_np_nof_amoert_p`
+3. `_a_no_nuo_impuot_s`
+
+**Context Size 4:**
+
+1. `_di_kans,_by_nubia_`
+2. `a_di_dieta_di_sophy`
+3. `_ah_ab_tuul._founli`
+
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Predictability:** Context-4 (word) with 98.3% predictability
+- **Branching Factor:** Decreases with context size (more deterministic)
+- **Memory Trade-off:** Larger contexts require more storage (72,952 contexts)
+- **Recommendation:** Context-3 or Context-4 for text generation
+
+---
+## 4. Vocabulary Analysis
+
+![Zipf's Law](visualizations/zipf_law.png)
+
+![Top Words](visualizations/top20_words.png)
+
+![Coverage Curve](visualizations/vocab_coverage.png)
+
+### Statistics
+
+| Metric | Value |
+|--------|-------|
+| Vocabulary Size | 10,520 |
+| Total Tokens | 170,163 |
+| Mean Frequency | 16.18 |
+| Median Frequency | 3 |
+| Frequency Std Dev | 187.26 |
+
+### Most Common Words
+
+| Rank | Word | Frequency |
+|------|------|-----------|
+| 1 | di | 13,145 |
+| 2 | a | 11,091 |
+| 3 | ah | 4,442 |
+| 4 | ina | 4,225 |
+| 5 | fi | 2,654 |
+| 6 | we | 1,934 |
+| 7 | tu | 1,838 |
+| 8 | wah | 1,390 |
+| 9 | ar | 1,371 |
+| 10 | az | 1,170 |
+
+### Least Common Words (from vocabulary)
+
+| Rank | Word | Frequency |
+|------|------|-----------|
+| 1 | turn | 2 |
+| 2 | episode | 2 |
+| 3 | clips | 2 |
+| 4 | schaffer | 2 |
+| 5 | politico | 2 |
+| 6 | youtube | 2 |
+| 7 | archived | 2 |
+| 8 | viral | 2 |
+| 9 | klein | 2 |
+| 10 | cancel | 2 |
+
+### Zipf's Law Analysis
+
+| Metric | Value |
+|--------|-------|
+| Zipf Coefficient | 1.0629 |
+| R² (Goodness of Fit) | 0.987155 |
+| Adherence Quality | **excellent** |
+
+### Coverage Analysis
+
+| Top N Words | Coverage |
+|-------------|----------|
+| Top 100 | 44.1% |
+| Top 1,000 | 72.2% |
+| Top 5,000 | 92.3% |
+| Top 10,000 | 99.4% |
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Zipf Compliance:** R²=0.9872 indicates excellent adherence to Zipf's law
+- **High Frequency Dominance:** Top 100 words cover 44.1% of corpus
+- **Long Tail:** 520 words needed for remaining 0.6% coverage
+
+---
+## 5. Word Embeddings Evaluation
+
+![Embedding Isotropy](visualizations/embedding_isotropy.png)
+
+![Similarity Matrix](visualizations/embedding_similarity.png)
+
+![t-SNE Words](visualizations/tsne_words.png)
+
+![t-SNE Sentences](visualizations/tsne_sentences.png)
+
+
+### 5.1 Cross-Lingual Alignment
+
+![Alignment Quality](visualizations/embedding_alignment_quality.png)
+
+![Multilingual t-SNE](visualizations/embedding_tsne_multilingual.png)
+
+
+### 5.2 Model Comparison
+
+| Model | Dimension | Isotropy | Semantic Density | Alignment R@1 | Alignment R@10 |
+|-------|-----------|----------|------------------|---------------|----------------|
+| **mono_32d** | 32 | 0.1451 🏆 | 0.5442 | N/A | N/A |
+| **mono_64d** | 64 | 0.0312 | 0.5648 | N/A | N/A |
+| **mono_128d** | 128 | 0.0054 | 0.5708 | N/A | N/A |
+| **aligned_32d** | 32 | 0.1451 | 0.5158 | 0.0080 | 0.0920 |
+| **aligned_64d** | 64 | 0.0312 | 0.5492 | 0.0140 | 0.1180 |
+| **aligned_128d** | 128 | 0.0054 | 0.5682 | 0.0200 | 0.1320 |
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Isotropy:** mono_32d with 0.1451 (more uniform distribution)
+- **Semantic Density:** Average pairwise similarity of 0.5522. Lower values indicate better semantic separation.
+- **Alignment Quality:** Aligned models achieve up to 2.0% R@1 in cross-lingual retrieval.
+- **Recommendation:** 128d aligned for best cross-lingual performance
+
+---
+## 6.  Morphological Analysis (Experimental)
+
+This section presents an automated morphological analysis derived from the statistical divergence between word-level and subword-level models. By analyzing where subword predictability spikes and where word-level coverage fails, we can infer linguistic structures without supervised data.
+
+### 6.1 Productivity & Complexity
+
+| Metric | Value | Interpretation | Recommendation |
+|--------|-------|----------------|----------------|
+| Productivity Index | **4.300** | High morphological productivity | Reliable analysis |
+| Idiomaticity Gap | **1.654** | High formulaic/idiomatic content | - |
+
+### 6.2 Affix Inventory (Productive Units)
+
+These are the most productive prefixes and suffixes identified by sampling the vocabulary for global substitutability patterns. A unit is considered an affix if stripping it leaves a valid stem that appears in other contexts.
+
+#### Productive Prefixes
+| Prefix | Examples |
+|--------|----------|
+| `-a` | akses, amplifai, araival |
+| `-s` | staat, savlamaar, skyaaboro |
+| `-i` | injri, inschument, ivenchal |
+| `-p` | pavati, park, platfaam |
+| `-m` | mahtah, mendeleev, migl |
+| `-k` | kraitiiria, konghwaguk, kori |
+| `-b` | buush, bahá, bizniz |
+| `-r` | rizol, romance, room |
+
+#### Productive Suffixes
+| Suffix | Examples |
+|--------|----------|
+| `-n` | nuon, chrienin, yuumankain |
+| `-an` | riilizieshan, porjan, dipikshan |
+| `-s` | akses, viskyuos, takes |
+| `-i` | amplifai, pavati, injri |
+| `-a` | kraitiiria, tunisia, kyaa |
+| `-l` | nigril, araival, rizol |
+| `-t` | edit, staat, inschument |
+| `-al` | araival, tioretikal, ivenchal |
+
+### 6.3 Bound Stems (Lexical Roots)
+
+Bound stems are high-frequency subword units that are semantically cohesive but rarely appear as standalone words. These often correspond to the 'core' of a word that requires inflection or derivation to be valid.
+
+| Stem | Cohesion | Substitutability | Examples |
+|------|----------|------------------|----------|
+| `schr` | 1.42x | 26 contexts | aschro, ischri, schres |
+| `chra` | 1.37x | 28 contexts | chrai, chrak, exchra |
+| `iesh` | 1.51x | 18 contexts | iesha, riesho, ieshan |
+| `ikal` | 1.45x | 17 contexts | maikal, etikal, fizikal |
+| `ment` | 1.36x | 19 contexts | mento, kament, moment |
+| `toer` | 1.40x | 17 contexts | toerx, toerd, toerm |
+| `iiri` | 1.42x | 16 contexts | tiiri, siiriz, siiriiz |
+| `tiet` | 1.46x | 14 contexts | stiet, tieta, sitiet |
+| `riti` | 1.40x | 15 contexts | priti, eritij, kritik |
+| `shal` | 1.33x | 17 contexts | shalo, shalom, speshal |
+| `esha` | 1.45x | 13 contexts | iesha, presha, ieshan |
+| `isti` | 1.47x | 12 contexts | istil, istiet, sistim |
+
+### 6.4 Affix Compatibility (Co-occurrence)
+
+This table shows which prefixes and suffixes most frequently co-occur on the same stems, revealing the 'stacking' rules of the language's morphology.
+
+| Prefix | Suffix | Frequency | Examples |
+|--------|--------|-----------|----------|
+| `-k` | `-n` | 107 words | kaatuun, kansenchrieshan |
+| `-a` | `-n` | 81 words | alkalain, aprishieshan |
+| `-k` | `-an` | 80 words | kansenchrieshan, konfederashan |
+| `-i` | `-n` | 76 words | ingkluudn, imiin |
+| `-p` | `-n` | 74 words | puoshan, pakistan |
+| `-s` | `-n` | 73 words | susan, siblizieshan |
+| `-i` | `-t` | 68 words | intoerprit, ikuivilent |
+| `-r` | `-n` | 67 words | remain, riikan |
+| `-a` | `-i` | 57 words | aatobayagrafi, ali |
+| `-a` | `-an` | 55 words | aprishieshan, aaran |
+
+### 6.5 Recursive Morpheme Segmentation
+
+Using **Recursive Hierarchical Substitutability**, we decompose complex words into their constituent morphemes. This approach handles nested affixes (e.g., `prefix-prefix-root-suffix`).
+
+| Word | Suggested Split | Confidence | Stem |
+|------|-----------------|------------|------|
+| kantinyuiti | **`kantinyu-i-ti`** | 7.5 | `i` |
+| kritikdem | **`kritik-d-em`** | 7.5 | `d` |
+| apastalik | **`apast-al-ik`** | 7.5 | `al` |
+| aatimisinin | **`aatimis-in-in`** | 7.5 | `in` |
+| signifikans | **`signifik-an-s`** | 7.5 | `an` |
+| plietanik | **`pliet-an-ik`** | 7.5 | `an` |
+| suitsalan | **`suits-al-an`** | 7.5 | `al` |
+| inishitiv | **`inishi-t-iv`** | 7.5 | `t` |
+| distingtiv | **`disting-t-iv`** | 7.5 | `t` |
+| afrikaanz | **`afrika-an-z`** | 7.5 | `an` |
+| yuuropiian | **`yuuropi-i-an`** | 7.5 | `i` |
+| salamanik | **`salam-an-ik`** | 7.5 | `an` |
+| ilekchisiti | **`ilekchis-i-ti`** | 7.5 | `i` |
+| afrikanis | **`afrik-an-is`** | 7.5 | `an` |
+| chadishanal | **`chadish-an-al`** | 7.5 | `an` |
+
+### 6.6 Linguistic Interpretation
+
+> **Automated Insight:**
+The language Jamaican Creole English shows high morphological productivity. The subword models are significantly more efficient than word models, suggesting a rich system of affixation or compounding.
+
+> **Note on Idiomaticity:** The high Idiomaticity Gap suggests a large number of frequent multi-word expressions or formulaic sequences that are statistically distinct from their component parts.
+
+---
+## 7. Summary & Recommendations
+
+![Performance Dashboard](visualizations/performance_dashboard.png)
+
+### Production Recommendations
+
+| Component | Recommended | Rationale |
+|-----------|-------------|-----------|
+| Tokenizer | **32k BPE** | Best compression (4.52x) |
+| N-gram | **2-gram** | Lowest perplexity (238) |
+| Markov | **Context-4** | Highest predictability (98.3%) |
+| Embeddings | **100d** | Balanced semantic capture and isotropy |
+
+
+---
+## Appendix: Metrics Glossary & Interpretation Guide
+
+This section provides definitions, intuitions, and guidance for interpreting the metrics used throughout this report.
+
+### Tokenizer Metrics
+
+**Compression Ratio**
+> *Definition:* The ratio of characters to tokens (chars/token). Measures how efficiently the tokenizer represents text.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Higher compression means fewer tokens needed to represent the same text, reducing sequence lengths for downstream models. A 3x compression means ~3 characters per token on average.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Higher is generally better for efficiency, but extremely high compression may indicate overly aggressive merging that loses morphological information.
+
+**Average Token Length (Fertility)**
+> *Definition:* Mean number of characters per token produced by the tokenizer.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Reflects the granularity of tokenization. Longer tokens capture more context but may struggle with rare words; shorter tokens are more flexible but increase sequence length.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Balance between 2-5 characters for most languages. Arabic/morphologically-rich languages may benefit from slightly longer tokens.
+
+**Unknown Token Rate (OOV Rate)**
+> *Definition:* Percentage of tokens that map to the unknown/UNK token, indicating words the tokenizer cannot represent.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Lower OOV means better vocabulary coverage. High OOV indicates the tokenizer encounters many unseen character sequences.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Below 1% is excellent; below 5% is acceptable. BPE tokenizers typically achieve very low OOV due to subword fallback.
+
+### N-gram Model Metrics
+
+**Perplexity**
+> *Definition:* Measures how "surprised" the model is by test data. Mathematically: 2^(cross-entropy). Lower values indicate better prediction.
+>
+> *Intuition:* If perplexity is 100, the model is as uncertain as if choosing uniformly among 100 options at each step. A perplexity of 10 means effectively choosing among 10 equally likely options.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Lower is better. Perplexity decreases with larger n-grams (more context). Values vary widely by language and corpus size.
+
+**Entropy**
+> *Definition:* Average information content (in bits) needed to encode the next token given the context. Related to perplexity: perplexity = 2^entropy.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High entropy means high uncertainty/randomness; low entropy means predictable patterns. Natural language typically has entropy between 1-4 bits per character.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Lower entropy indicates more predictable text patterns. Entropy should decrease as n-gram size increases.
+
+**Coverage (Top-K)**
+> *Definition:* Percentage of corpus occurrences explained by the top K most frequent n-grams.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High coverage with few patterns indicates repetitive/formulaic text; low coverage suggests diverse vocabulary usage.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Depends on use case. For language modeling, moderate coverage (40-60% with top-1000) is typical for natural text.
+
+### Markov Chain Metrics
+
+**Average Entropy**
+> *Definition:* Mean entropy across all contexts, measuring average uncertainty in next-word prediction.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Lower entropy means the model is more confident about what comes next. Context-1 has high entropy (many possible next words); Context-4 has low entropy (few likely continuations).
+>
+> *What to seek:* Decreasing entropy with larger context sizes. Very low entropy (<0.1) indicates highly deterministic transitions.
+
+**Branching Factor**
+> *Definition:* Average number of unique next tokens observed for each context.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High branching = many possible continuations (flexible but uncertain); low branching = few options (predictable but potentially repetitive).
+>
+> *What to seek:* Branching factor should decrease with context size. Values near 1.0 indicate nearly deterministic chains.
+
+**Predictability**
+> *Definition:* Derived metric: (1 - normalized_entropy) × 100%. Indicates how deterministic the model's predictions are.
+>
+> *Intuition:* 100% predictability means the next word is always certain; 0% means completely random. Real text falls between these extremes.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Higher predictability for text generation quality, but too high (>98%) may produce repetitive output.
+
+### Vocabulary & Zipf's Law Metrics
+
+**Zipf's Coefficient**
+> *Definition:* The slope of the log-log plot of word frequency vs. rank. Zipf's law predicts this should be approximately -1.
+>
+> *Intuition:* A coefficient near -1 indicates the corpus follows natural language patterns where a few words are very common and most words are rare.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Values between -0.8 and -1.2 indicate healthy natural language distribution. Deviations may suggest domain-specific or artificial text.
+
+**R² (Coefficient of Determination)**
+> *Definition:* Measures how well the linear fit explains the frequency-rank relationship. Ranges from 0 to 1.
+>
+> *Intuition:* R² near 1.0 means the data closely follows Zipf's law; lower values indicate deviation from expected word frequency patterns.
+>
+> *What to seek:* R² > 0.95 is excellent; > 0.99 indicates near-perfect Zipf adherence typical of large natural corpora.
+
+**Vocabulary Coverage**
+> *Definition:* Cumulative percentage of corpus tokens accounted for by the top N words.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Shows how concentrated word usage is. If top-100 words cover 50% of text, the corpus relies heavily on common words.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Top-100 covering 30-50% is typical. Higher coverage indicates more repetitive text; lower suggests richer vocabulary.
+
+### Word Embedding Metrics
+
+**Isotropy**
+> *Definition:* Measures how uniformly distributed vectors are in the embedding space. Computed as the ratio of minimum to maximum singular values.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High isotropy (near 1.0) means vectors spread evenly in all directions; low isotropy means vectors cluster in certain directions, reducing expressiveness.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Higher isotropy generally indicates better-quality embeddings. Values > 0.1 are reasonable; > 0.3 is good. Lower-dimensional embeddings tend to have higher isotropy.
+
+**Average Norm**
+> *Definition:* Mean magnitude (L2 norm) of word vectors in the embedding space.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Indicates the typical "length" of vectors. Consistent norms suggest stable training; high variance may indicate some words are undertrained.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Relatively consistent norms across models. The absolute value matters less than consistency (low std deviation).
+
+**Cosine Similarity**
+> *Definition:* Measures angular similarity between vectors, ranging from -1 (opposite) to 1 (identical direction).
+>
+> *Intuition:* Words with similar meanings should have high cosine similarity. This is the standard metric for semantic relatedness in embeddings.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Semantically related words should score > 0.5; unrelated words should be near 0. Synonyms often score > 0.7.
+
+**t-SNE Visualization**
+> *Definition:* t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding - a dimensionality reduction technique that preserves local structure for visualization.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Clusters in t-SNE plots indicate groups of semantically related words. Spread indicates vocabulary diversity; tight clusters suggest semantic coherence.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Meaningful clusters (e.g., numbers together, verbs together). Avoid over-interpreting distances - t-SNE preserves local, not global, structure.
+
+### General Interpretation Guidelines
+
+1. **Compare within model families:** Metrics are most meaningful when comparing models of the same type (e.g., 8k vs 64k tokenizer).
+2. **Consider trade-offs:** Better performance on one metric often comes at the cost of another (e.g., compression vs. OOV rate).
+3. **Context matters:** Optimal values depend on downstream tasks. Text generation may prioritize different metrics than classification.
+4. **Corpus influence:** All metrics are influenced by corpus characteristics. Wikipedia text differs from social media or literature.
+5. **Language-specific patterns:** Morphologically rich languages (like Arabic) may show different optimal ranges than analytic languages.
+
+
+### Visualizations Index
+
+| Visualization | Description |
+|---------------|-------------|
+| Tokenizer Compression | Compression ratios by vocabulary size |
+| Tokenizer Fertility | Average token length by vocabulary |
+| Tokenizer OOV | Unknown token rates |
+| Tokenizer Total Tokens | Total tokens by vocabulary |
+| N-gram Perplexity | Perplexity by n-gram size |
+| N-gram Entropy | Entropy by n-gram size |
+| N-gram Coverage | Top pattern coverage |
+| N-gram Unique | Unique n-gram counts |
+| Markov Entropy | Entropy by context size |
+| Markov Branching | Branching factor by context |
+| Markov Contexts | Unique context counts |
+| Zipf's Law | Frequency-rank distribution with fit |
+| Vocab Frequency | Word frequency distribution |
+| Top 20 Words | Most frequent words |
+| Vocab Coverage | Cumulative coverage curve |
+| Embedding Isotropy | Vector space uniformity |
+| Embedding Norms | Vector magnitude distribution |
+| Embedding Similarity | Word similarity heatmap |
+| Nearest Neighbors | Similar words for key terms |
+| t-SNE Words | 2D word embedding visualization |
+| t-SNE Sentences | 2D sentence embedding visualization |
+| Position Encoding | Encoding method comparison |
+| Model Sizes | Storage requirements |
+| Performance Dashboard | Comprehensive performance overview |
+
+---
+## About This Project
+
+### Data Source
+
+Models trained on [wikipedia-monthly](https://huggingface.co/datasets/omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly) - a monthly snapshot of Wikipedia articles across 300+ languages.
+
+### Project
+
+A project by **[Wikilangs](https://wikilangs.org)** - Open-source NLP models for every Wikipedia language.
+
+### Maintainer
+
+[Omar Kamali](https://omarkamali.com) - [Omneity Labs](https://omneitylabs.com)
+
+### Citation
+
+If you use these models in your research, please cite:
+
+```bibtex
+@misc{wikilangs2025,
+  author = {Kamali, Omar},
+  title = {Wikilangs: Open NLP Models for Wikipedia Languages},
+  year = {2025},
+  doi = {10.5281/zenodo.18073153},
+  publisher = {Zenodo},
+  url = {https://huggingface.co/wikilangs}
+  institution = {Omneity Labs}
+}
+```
+
+### License
+
+MIT License - Free for academic and commercial use.
+
+### Links
+
+- 🌐 Website: [wikilangs.org](https://wikilangs.org)
+- 🤗 Models: [huggingface.co/wikilangs](https://huggingface.co/wikilangs)
+- 📊 Data: [wikipedia-monthly](https://huggingface.co/datasets/omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly)
+- 👤 Author: [Omar Kamali](https://huggingface.co/omarkamali)
+- 🤝 Sponsor: [Featherless AI](https://featherless.ai)
+---
+*Generated by Wikilangs Models Pipeline*
+
+*Report Date: 2026-01-10 05:49:27*

models/embeddings/aligned/jam_128d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:5d67c7436fbfdfb90951da142072267842558f5855e42d3e8517a294ba9f5f18
+size 1028352567

models/embeddings/aligned/jam_128d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "jam", "dim": 128, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": true}

models/embeddings/aligned/jam_128d.projection.npy

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:c18b11d3bf10cc966bf61c2d958a9d772253c5a368ee1328f02d065650c066ae
+size 65664

models/embeddings/aligned/jam_128d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+{
+  "language": "jam",
+  "dimension": 128,
+  "version": "aligned",
+  "hub_language": "en",
+  "seed_vocab_size": 1142,
+  "vocab_size": 4185
+}

models/embeddings/aligned/jam_32d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:de1a87d848b60abe0392024909b0f63b7490656d846c2ea4d8359775982a67b4
+size 257138487

models/embeddings/aligned/jam_32d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "jam", "dim": 32, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": true}

models/embeddings/aligned/jam_32d.projection.npy

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:4d103f07ebe479882935ff640eb2a4e619ebd310099ba33cfe9602c32411c076
+size 4224

models/embeddings/aligned/jam_32d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+{
+  "language": "jam",
+  "dimension": 32,
+  "version": "aligned",
+  "hub_language": "en",
+  "seed_vocab_size": 1142,
+  "vocab_size": 4185
+}

models/embeddings/aligned/jam_64d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:6642202a4bd07ef532fa12a51368cc8c104438365dd6cf3fcc33efd9ccea8127
+size 514209847

models/embeddings/aligned/jam_64d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "jam", "dim": 64, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": true}

models/embeddings/aligned/jam_64d.projection.npy

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:8de3a19e8fa2aeba26fd35756d102a55a99bfdf052be6998725e09c5e77b93c7
+size 16512

models/embeddings/aligned/jam_64d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+{
+  "language": "jam",
+  "dimension": 64,
+  "version": "aligned",
+  "hub_language": "en",
+  "seed_vocab_size": 1142,
+  "vocab_size": 4185
+}

models/embeddings/monolingual/jam_128d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:5d67c7436fbfdfb90951da142072267842558f5855e42d3e8517a294ba9f5f18
+size 1028352567

models/embeddings/monolingual/jam_128d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "jam", "dim": 128, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": false}

models/embeddings/monolingual/jam_128d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+{
+  "language": "jam",
+  "dimension": 128,
+  "version": "monolingual",
+  "training_params": {
+    "algorithm": "skipgram",
+    "min_count": 5,
+    "window": 5,
+    "negative": 5,
+    "epochs": 5,
+    "encoding_method": "rope",
+    "dim": 128,
+    "threads": 5
+  },
+  "vocab_size": 4185
+}

models/embeddings/monolingual/jam_32d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:de1a87d848b60abe0392024909b0f63b7490656d846c2ea4d8359775982a67b4
+size 257138487

models/embeddings/monolingual/jam_32d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "jam", "dim": 32, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": false}

models/embeddings/monolingual/jam_32d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+{
+  "language": "jam",
+  "dimension": 32,
+  "version": "monolingual",
+  "training_params": {
+    "algorithm": "skipgram",
+    "min_count": 5,
+    "window": 5,
+    "negative": 5,
+    "epochs": 5,
+    "encoding_method": "rope",
+    "dim": 32,
+    "threads": 5
+  },
+  "vocab_size": 4185
+}

models/embeddings/monolingual/jam_64d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:6642202a4bd07ef532fa12a51368cc8c104438365dd6cf3fcc33efd9ccea8127
+size 514209847

models/embeddings/monolingual/jam_64d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "jam", "dim": 64, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": false}

models/embeddings/monolingual/jam_64d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+{
+  "language": "jam",
+  "dimension": 64,
+  "version": "monolingual",
+  "training_params": {
+    "algorithm": "skipgram",
+    "min_count": 5,
+    "window": 5,
+    "negative": 5,
+    "epochs": 5,
+    "encoding_method": "rope",
+    "dim": 64,
+    "threads": 5
+  },
+  "vocab_size": 4185
+}

models/subword_markov/jam_markov_ctx1_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:34c9ec8fc0ebaa4dfc95df36c9fd676778f85116dd853ca4801d1e2cf972cad8
+size 35113

models/subword_markov/jam_markov_ctx1_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 1,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "jam",
+  "unique_contexts": 632,
+  "total_transitions": 1064928
+}

models/subword_markov/jam_markov_ctx2_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:1d7dc310e1550021b354f4ede42d0e45574198bd8d98734871c095dc293ac4a1
+size 169835

models/subword_markov/jam_markov_ctx2_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 2,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "jam",
+  "unique_contexts": 3949,
+  "total_transitions": 1063292
+}

models/subword_markov/jam_markov_ctx3_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:a8ae479285c67c7fd168d10a2e099e52f0b9a3ca8e0e2a7c6f9b4f3b41222d90
+size 553149

models/subword_markov/jam_markov_ctx3_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 3,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "jam",
+  "unique_contexts": 19800,
+  "total_transitions": 1061656
+}

models/subword_markov/jam_markov_ctx4_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:075c4a2b3c7d820f68f137902ea88e8c71a7ae3c6a13e4e0d79f144691d11ff5
+size 1377149

models/subword_markov/jam_markov_ctx4_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 4,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "jam",
+  "unique_contexts": 72952,
+  "total_transitions": 1060020
+}

models/subword_ngram/jam_2gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:6154469f6b9ce29bf26188cd8a32aa89fd9d8c0a8ad0d52219a2fbb9558744e5
+size 19769

models/subword_ngram/jam_2gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 2,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "jam",
+  "unique_ngrams": 1403,
+  "total_ngrams": 1064928
+}

models/subword_ngram/jam_3gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:7d6b9000d7aad1c5f0b028c5990ed8e99646173885c4bf8061daf3b40e67cdca
+size 109962

models/subword_ngram/jam_3gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 3,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "jam",
+  "unique_ngrams": 9633,
+  "total_ngrams": 1063292
+}

models/subword_ngram/jam_4gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:42fa83282b827edbc3f21bf2e46fb8f61ef9ffc69cc85c7b79ff56a326f522e7
+size 504008

models/subword_ngram/jam_4gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 4,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "jam",
+  "unique_ngrams": 41304,
+  "total_ngrams": 1061656
+}

models/subword_ngram/jam_5gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:6dceca116c2747f714edff17053cdce9754ed8ad02e610495c794a2aa74328cb
+size 977913

models/subword_ngram/jam_5gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 5,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "jam",
+  "unique_ngrams": 84144,
+  "total_ngrams": 1060020
+}

models/tokenizer/jam_tokenizer_16k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:ae25c46813e5747a55d299eae02ae14d4523812767f5d2da3618ed0a3b0aa87c
+size 508917

models/tokenizer/jam_tokenizer_32k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:5869e8f95ec65e6b3bf5f85e943bb9487c3fd6a8079ff80c2395ea3bb6169445
+size 792481

models/tokenizer/jam_tokenizer_8k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:b6d466417563729ef3cb93e021b9d227dd89313e1c3010c6cb21d498550ceb83
+size 372642

models/vocabulary/jam_vocabulary.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:fb9a5e142212a4e601d10192c49acf072363ec2f05e8b3366c91dfa2b8089abf
+size 170082

models/vocabulary/jam_vocabulary_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+{
+  "language": "jam",
+  "vocabulary_size": 10520,
+  "variant": "full",
+  "statistics": {
+    "type_token_ratio": 0.13078301018713623,
+    "coverage": {
+      "top_100": 0.40850906279435706,
+      "top_1000": 0.6688064553012855,
+      "top_5000": 0.85532197557483,
+      "top_10000": 0.9208332652738984
+    },
+    "hapax_count": 13500,
+    "hapax_ratio": 0.5620316402997502,
+    "total_documents": 1636
+  }
+}

models/word_markov/jam_markov_ctx1_word.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:b40f023c4db91e7753e2afaa6562eb315da5feed98a61c6cd73f39bfdb772f4a
+size 818861

models/word_markov/jam_markov_ctx1_word_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 1,
+  "variant": "word",
+  "language": "jam",
+  "unique_contexts": 23902,
+  "total_transitions": 182027
+}