Upload all models and assets for mhr (latest)

.gitattributes

@@ -33,3 +33,10 @@ saved_model/**/* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *.zip filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *.zst filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *tfevents* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/embedding_similarity.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/embedding_tsne_multilingual.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/performance_dashboard.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/position_encoding_comparison.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/tsne_sentences.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/tsne_words.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/zipf_law.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text

README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,775 @@
+---
+language: mhr
+language_name: Eastern Mari
+language_family: uralic_volgaic
+tags:
+  - wikilangs
+  - nlp
+  - tokenizer
+  - embeddings
+  - n-gram
+  - markov
+  - wikipedia
+  - feature-extraction
+  - sentence-similarity
+  - tokenization
+  - n-grams
+  - markov-chain
+  - text-mining
+  - fasttext
+  - babelvec
+  - vocabulous
+  - vocabulary
+  - monolingual
+  - family-uralic_volgaic
+license: mit
+library_name: wikilangs
+pipeline_tag: text-generation
+datasets:
+  - omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly
+dataset_info:
+  name: wikipedia-monthly
+  description: Monthly snapshots of Wikipedia articles across 300+ languages
+metrics:
+  - name: best_compression_ratio
+    type: compression
+    value: 4.335
+  - name: best_isotropy
+    type: isotropy
+    value: 0.8198
+  - name: vocabulary_size
+    type: vocab
+    value: 0
+generated: 2026-01-10
+---
+
+# Eastern Mari - Wikilangs Models
+## Comprehensive Research Report & Full Ablation Study
+
+This repository contains NLP models trained and evaluated by Wikilangs, specifically on **Eastern Mari** Wikipedia data.
+We analyze tokenizers, n-gram models, Markov chains, vocabulary statistics, and word embeddings.
+
+## 📋 Repository Contents
+
+### Models & Assets
+
+- Tokenizers (8k, 16k, 32k, 64k)
+- N-gram models (2, 3, 4, 5-gram)
+- Markov chains (context of 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5)
+- Subword N-gram and Markov chains
+- Embeddings in various sizes and dimensions (aligned and unaligned)
+- Language Vocabulary
+- Language Statistics
+
+![Performance Dashboard](visualizations/performance_dashboard.png)
+
+### Analysis and Evaluation
+
+- [1. Tokenizer Evaluation](#1-tokenizer-evaluation)
+- [2. N-gram Model Evaluation](#2-n-gram-model-evaluation)
+- [3. Markov Chain Evaluation](#3-markov-chain-evaluation)
+- [4. Vocabulary Analysis](#4-vocabulary-analysis)
+- [5. Word Embeddings Evaluation](#5-word-embeddings-evaluation)
+- [6. Morphological Analysis (Experimental)](#6--morphological-analysis-experimental)
+- [7. Summary & Recommendations](#7-summary--recommendations)
+- [Metrics Glossary](#appendix-metrics-glossary--interpretation-guide)
+- [Visualizations Index](#visualizations-index)
+
+---
+## 1. Tokenizer Evaluation
+
+![Tokenizer Compression](visualizations/tokenizer_compression.png)
+
+![Tokenizer Fertility](visualizations/tokenizer_fertility.png)
+
+![Tokenizer OOV](visualizations/tokenizer_oov.png)
+
+![Total Tokens](visualizations/tokenizer_total_tokens.png)
+
+### Results
+
+| Vocab Size | Compression | Avg Token Len | UNK Rate | Total Tokens |
+|------------|-------------|---------------|----------|--------------|
+| **8k** | 3.658x | 3.66 | 0.0886% | 476,276 |
+| **16k** | 3.968x | 3.97 | 0.0961% | 439,027 |
+| **32k** | 4.189x | 4.19 | 0.1015% | 415,901 |
+| **64k** | 4.335x 🏆 | 4.34 | 0.1050% | 401,897 |
+
+### Tokenization Examples
+
+Below are sample sentences tokenized with each vocabulary size:
+
+**Sample 1:** `Ворзель () — Украиныште Киев велыште Буча кундемыштыже верланыше посёлко. Калыкч...`
+
+| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
+|-------|--------|-------|
+| 8k | `▁вор з ель ▁() ▁— ▁украиныште ▁киев ▁велыште ▁буча ▁кундемыштыже ... (+16 more)` | 26 |
+| 16k | `▁вор з ель ▁() ▁— ▁украиныште ▁киев ▁велыште ▁буча ▁кундемыштыже ... (+16 more)` | 26 |
+| 32k | `▁вор з ель ▁() ▁— ▁украиныште ▁киев ▁велыште ▁буча ▁кундемыштыже ... (+16 more)` | 26 |
+| 64k | `▁ворзель ▁() ▁— ▁украиныште ▁киев ▁велыште ▁буча ▁кундемыштыже ▁верланыше ▁посёлко ... (+14 more)` | 24 |
+
+**Sample 2:** `Пункт () — дюймын 1/72 наре ужашыже лийше кӱшычын ӱлык шрифтын висымкугытшо.`
+
+| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
+|-------|--------|-------|
+| 8k | `▁пункт ▁() ▁— ▁д юй мын ▁ 1 / 7 ... (+17 more)` | 27 |
+| 16k | `▁пункт ▁() ▁— ▁дюй мын ▁ 1 / 7 2 ... (+15 more)` | 25 |
+| 32k | `▁пункт ▁() ▁— ▁дюй мын ▁ 1 / 7 2 ... (+10 more)` | 20 |
+| 64k | `▁пункт ▁() ▁— ▁дюймын ▁ 1 / 7 2 ▁наре ... (+8 more)` | 18 |
+
+**Sample 3:** `238 ий — III курымын ийже. Мо лийын Кӧ шочын Кӧ колен курым`
+
+| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
+|-------|--------|-------|
+| 8k | `▁ 2 3 8 ▁ий ▁— ▁iii ▁курымын ▁ийже . ... (+7 more)` | 17 |
+| 16k | `▁ 2 3 8 ▁ий ▁— ▁iii ▁курымын ▁ийже . ... (+7 more)` | 17 |
+| 32k | `▁ 2 3 8 ▁ий ▁— ▁iii ▁курымын ▁ийже . ... (+7 more)` | 17 |
+| 64k | `▁ 2 3 8 ▁ий ▁— ▁iii ▁курымын ▁ийже . ... (+7 more)` | 17 |
+
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Compression:** 64k achieves 4.335x compression
+- **Lowest UNK Rate:** 8k with 0.0886% unknown tokens
+- **Trade-off:** Larger vocabularies improve compression but increase model size
+- **Recommendation:** 32k vocabulary provides optimal balance for production use
+
+---
+## 2. N-gram Model Evaluation
+
+![N-gram Perplexity](visualizations/ngram_perplexity.png)
+
+![N-gram Unique](visualizations/ngram_unique.png)
+
+![N-gram Coverage](visualizations/ngram_coverage.png)
+
+### Results
+
+| N-gram | Variant | Perplexity | Entropy | Unique N-grams | Top-100 Coverage | Top-1000 Coverage |
+|--------|---------|------------|---------|----------------|------------------|-------------------|
+| **2-gram** | Word | 3,582 | 11.81 | 26,265 | 34.2% | 60.8% |
+| **2-gram** | Subword | 439 🏆 | 8.78 | 3,878 | 54.6% | 97.4% |
+| **3-gram** | Word | 4,130 | 12.01 | 36,566 | 34.5% | 60.2% |
+| **3-gram** | Subword | 3,337 | 11.70 | 33,949 | 19.6% | 64.9% |
+| **4-gram** | Word | 7,186 | 12.81 | 70,518 | 30.8% | 54.1% |
+| **4-gram** | Subword | 13,025 | 13.67 | 159,935 | 11.7% | 42.2% |
+| **5-gram** | Word | 6,518 | 12.67 | 62,229 | 31.1% | 55.2% |
+| **5-gram** | Subword | 29,667 | 14.86 | 355,981 | 9.8% | 34.7% |
+
+### Top 5 N-grams by Size
+
+**2-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `марий эл` | 13,258 |
+| 2 | `йошкар ола` | 10,954 |
+| 3 | `республики марий` | 9,354 |
+| 4 | `великой отечественной` | 6,261 |
+| 5 | `отечественной войне` | 6,227 |
+
+**3-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `республики марий эл` | 9,353 |
+| 2 | `великой отечественной войне` | 6,227 |
+| 3 | `в великой отечественной` | 6,214 |
+| 4 | `народа в великой` | 6,200 |
+| 5 | `подвиг народа в` | 6,199 |
+
+**4-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `в великой отечественной войне` | 6,214 |
+| 2 | `народа в великой отечественной` | 6,200 |
+| 3 | `документов подвиг народа в` | 6,199 |
+| 4 | `подвиг народа в великой` | 6,199 |
+| 5 | `банк документов подвиг народа` | 6,196 |
+
+**5-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `народа в великой отечественной войне` | 6,200 |
+| 2 | `документов подвиг народа в великой` | 6,199 |
+| 3 | `подвиг народа в великой отечественной` | 6,199 |
+| 4 | `банк документов подвиг народа в` | 6,196 |
+| 5 | `в великой отечественной войне гг` | 6,196 |
+
+**2-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `. _` | 184,996 |
+| 2 | `е _` | 147,576 |
+| 3 | `л а` | 134,439 |
+| 4 | `_ к` | 133,534 |
+| 5 | `а р` | 121,950 |
+
+**3-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `и й _` | 64,060 |
+| 2 | `ы н _` | 57,801 |
+| 3 | `_ м а` | 49,403 |
+| 4 | `м а р` | 48,489 |
+| 5 | `р и й` | 42,988 |
+
+**4-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `м а р и` | 41,511 |
+| 2 | `_ м а р` | 41,069 |
+| 3 | `а р и й` | 40,250 |
+| 4 | `в л а к` | 32,702 |
+| 5 | `р и й _` | 32,360 |
+
+**5-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `м а р и й` | 39,931 |
+| 2 | `_ м а р и` | 36,163 |
+| 3 | `- в л а к` | 32,274 |
+| 4 | `а р и й _` | 30,689 |
+| 5 | `в л а к _` | 23,835 |
+
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Perplexity:** 2-gram (subword) with 439
+- **Entropy Trend:** Decreases with larger n-grams (more predictable)
+- **Coverage:** Top-1000 patterns cover ~35% of corpus
+- **Recommendation:** 4-gram or 5-gram for best predictive performance
+
+---
+## 3. Markov Chain Evaluation
+
+![Markov Entropy](visualizations/markov_entropy.png)
+
+![Markov Contexts](visualizations/markov_contexts.png)
+
+![Markov Branching](visualizations/markov_branching.png)
+
+### Results
+
+| Context | Variant | Avg Entropy | Perplexity | Branching Factor | Unique Contexts | Predictability |
+|---------|---------|-------------|------------|------------------|-----------------|----------------|
+| **1** | Word | 0.8000 | 1.741 | 5.03 | 109,319 | 20.0% |
+| **1** | Subword | 1.2025 | 2.301 | 10.94 | 715 | 0.0% |
+| **2** | Word | 0.2053 | 1.153 | 1.44 | 547,819 | 79.5% |
+| **2** | Subword | 1.1275 | 2.185 | 7.46 | 7,818 | 0.0% |
+| **3** | Word | 0.0723 | 1.051 | 1.14 | 786,559 | 92.8% |
+| **3** | Subword | 0.9049 | 1.872 | 4.46 | 58,298 | 9.5% |
+| **4** | Word | 0.0392 🏆 | 1.028 | 1.08 | 893,046 | 96.1% |
+| **4** | Subword | 0.6302 | 1.548 | 2.69 | 260,070 | 37.0% |
+
+### Generated Text Samples (Word-based)
+
+Below are text samples generated from each word-based Markov chain model:
+
+**Context Size 1:**
+
+1. `марий эл юринский район 304 с 123 лашт тыгак ончо тылзын коло ияш туныктен тӱвырам кучылтмаш`
+2. `влак историк влак посёлок боровской российыште вологда вел виче да калабрий регионын рӱдолаже сарман...`
+3. `с 35 ч 1 еҥ ий численность населения городских населенных пунктов звениговский муниципальный район с...`
+
+**Context Size 2:**
+
+1. `марий эл по делам архивов государственный архив республики марий эл республикын йӱдвел кипр турций р...`
+2. `йошкар ола с 125 158 15 ключева м а чап тамга орденын кавалерж кылвер влак хутор балезина`
+3. `республики марий эл по делам архивов государственный архив республики марий эл администрация муницип...`
+
+**Context Size 3:**
+
+1. `республики марий эл оршанский район сборник документальных очерков йошкар ола комитет республики мар...`
+2. `великой отечественной войне гг кузнецов михаил сарманаевич i степенян ачамланде сар орден да йошкар ...`
+3. `в великой отечественной войне гг аралымылан степенян чап орден влакын кавалерже ийласе кугу ачамланд...`
+
+**Context Size 4:**
+
+1. `в великой отечественной войне гг заровняев василий фёдорович ийласе кугу ачамланде сарын участникше ...`
+2. `народа в великой отечественной войне гг 11px i степенян ачамланде сар орденын кавалерже ийласе кугу ...`
+3. `документов подвиг народа в великой отечественной войне гг суаплан медальэлектронный банк документов ...`
+
+
+### Generated Text Samples (Subword-based)
+
+Below are text samples generated from each subword-based Markov chain model:
+
+**Context Size 1:**
+
+1. `_165_ушктренынап`
+2. `аск_-штлик_je_йс`
+3. `еше_«стэл:_ичий)`
+
+**Context Size 2:**
+
+1. `._*_matheleptedia`
+2. `е_ке,_эҥеш_марсти`
+3. `_кӧ_кумарий)_jah_`
+
+**Context Size 3:**
+
+1. `ий_элын,_марий_йӱл`
+2. `ын_моча_куснен_кун`
+3. `_мари-кушто_дене_в`
+
+**Context Size 4:**
+
+1. `марий-влак_кундемыш`
+2. `_марий_эл,_админист`
+3. `арий_эл_по_делам_ар`
+
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Predictability:** Context-4 (word) with 96.1% predictability
+- **Branching Factor:** Decreases with context size (more deterministic)
+- **Memory Trade-off:** Larger contexts require more storage (260,070 contexts)
+- **Recommendation:** Context-3 or Context-4 for text generation
+
+---
+## 4. Vocabulary Analysis
+
+![Zipf's Law](visualizations/zipf_law.png)
+
+![Top Words](visualizations/top20_words.png)
+
+![Coverage Curve](visualizations/vocab_coverage.png)
+
+### Statistics
+
+| Metric | Value |
+|--------|-------|
+| Vocabulary Size | 48,490 |
+| Total Tokens | 1,425,889 |
+| Mean Frequency | 29.41 |
+| Median Frequency | 4 |
+| Frequency Std Dev | 331.81 |
+
+### Most Common Words
+
+| Rank | Word | Frequency |
+|------|------|-----------|
+| 1 | марий | 30,639 |
+| 2 | влак | 26,643 |
+| 3 | с | 22,173 |
+| 4 | в | 15,995 |
+| 5 | эл | 13,818 |
+| 6 | йошкар | 13,689 |
+| 7 | ола | 13,467 |
+| 8 | ий | 11,834 |
+| 9 | ял | 11,645 |
+| 10 | и | 11,569 |
+
+### Least Common Words (from vocabulary)
+
+| Rank | Word | Frequency |
+|------|------|-----------|
+| 1 | слегка | 2 |
+| 2 | расстроены | 2 |
+| 3 | покачав | 2 |
+| 4 | брать | 2 |
+| 5 | поглаживая | 2 |
+| 6 | настраивать | 2 |
+| 7 | взял | 2 |
+| 8 | взмахнул | 2 |
+| 9 | поплыла | 2 |
+| 10 | комнате | 2 |
+
+### Zipf's Law Analysis
+
+| Metric | Value |
+|--------|-------|
+| Zipf Coefficient | 1.1394 |
+| R² (Goodness of Fit) | 0.995171 |
+| Adherence Quality | **excellent** |
+
+### Coverage Analysis
+
+| Top N Words | Coverage |
+|-------------|----------|
+| Top 100 | 36.4% |
+| Top 1,000 | 67.2% |
+| Top 5,000 | 84.2% |
+| Top 10,000 | 90.0% |
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Zipf Compliance:** R²=0.9952 indicates excellent adherence to Zipf's law
+- **High Frequency Dominance:** Top 100 words cover 36.4% of corpus
+- **Long Tail:** 38,490 words needed for remaining 10.0% coverage
+
+---
+## 5. Word Embeddings Evaluation
+
+![Embedding Isotropy](visualizations/embedding_isotropy.png)
+
+![Similarity Matrix](visualizations/embedding_similarity.png)
+
+![t-SNE Words](visualizations/tsne_words.png)
+
+![t-SNE Sentences](visualizations/tsne_sentences.png)
+
+
+### 5.1 Cross-Lingual Alignment
+
+![Alignment Quality](visualizations/embedding_alignment_quality.png)
+
+![Multilingual t-SNE](visualizations/embedding_tsne_multilingual.png)
+
+
+### 5.2 Model Comparison
+
+| Model | Dimension | Isotropy | Semantic Density | Alignment R@1 | Alignment R@10 |
+|-------|-----------|----------|------------------|---------------|----------------|
+| **mono_32d** | 32 | 0.8198 🏆 | 0.3483 | N/A | N/A |
+| **mono_64d** | 64 | 0.7400 | 0.2927 | N/A | N/A |
+| **mono_128d** | 128 | 0.3509 | 0.2627 | N/A | N/A |
+| **aligned_32d** | 32 | 0.8198 | 0.3439 | 0.0120 | 0.1120 |
+| **aligned_64d** | 64 | 0.7400 | 0.2932 | 0.0280 | 0.1860 |
+| **aligned_128d** | 128 | 0.3509 | 0.2652 | 0.0520 | 0.2340 |
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Isotropy:** mono_32d with 0.8198 (more uniform distribution)
+- **Semantic Density:** Average pairwise similarity of 0.3010. Lower values indicate better semantic separation.
+- **Alignment Quality:** Aligned models achieve up to 5.2% R@1 in cross-lingual retrieval.
+- **Recommendation:** 128d aligned for best cross-lingual performance
+
+---
+## 6.  Morphological Analysis (Experimental)
+
+This section presents an automated morphological analysis derived from the statistical divergence between word-level and subword-level models. By analyzing where subword predictability spikes and where word-level coverage fails, we can infer linguistic structures without supervised data.
+
+### 6.1 Productivity & Complexity
+
+| Metric | Value | Interpretation | Recommendation |
+|--------|-------|----------------|----------------|
+| Productivity Index | **5.000** | High morphological productivity | Reliable analysis |
+| Idiomaticity Gap | **0.590** | High formulaic/idiomatic content | - |
+
+### 6.2 Affix Inventory (Productive Units)
+
+These are the most productive prefixes and suffixes identified by sampling the vocabulary for global substitutability patterns. A unit is considered an affix if stripping it leaves a valid stem that appears in other contexts.
+
+#### Productive Prefixes
+| Prefix | Examples |
+|--------|----------|
+| `-к` | кертшылан, кравцов, капитон |
+| `-п` | пургыж, пайгусово, пырысым |
+| `-с` | саксофон, составитель, садретдинов |
+| `-т` | такая, таҥаса, тимофеевский |
+| `-ко` | командирын, кокыте, колмо |
+| `-м` | мурымыж, марийкалыкым, модшын |
+| `-а` | автора, аквалангым, акр |
+| `-в` | вашталтыш, ведра, веткино |
+
+#### Productive Suffixes
+| Suffix | Examples |
+|--------|----------|
+| `-е` | культовые, литературйылме, руэмское |
+| `-н` | кертшылан, капитон, чурийвылышан |
+| `-а` | хайруллина, дата, таҥаса |
+| `-й` | флоренций, тимофеевский, заведующий |
+| `-м` | яким, редакцийжым, марийкалыкым |
+| `-о` | пайгусово, общественно, качейкино |
+| `-ым` | редакцийжым, марийкалыкым, иктешлымашым |
+| `-ий` | флоренций, тимофеевский, заведующий |
+
+### 6.3 Bound Stems (Lexical Roots)
+
+Bound stems are high-frequency subword units that are semantically cohesive but rarely appear as standalone words. These often correspond to the 'core' of a word that requires inflection or derivation to be valid.
+
+| Stem | Cohesion | Substitutability | Examples |
+|------|----------|------------------|----------|
+| `ндем` | 2.44x | 22 contexts | киндем, шындем, тандем |
+| `ланд` | 2.03x | 35 contexts | ландау, юланда, мланде |
+| `рлан` | 1.84x | 37 contexts | арлан, ерлан, хорлан |
+| `айон` | 2.14x | 19 contexts | район, района, районе |
+| `демы` | 2.09x | 20 contexts | айдемын, айдемыш, айдемым |
+| `райо` | 2.14x | 16 contexts | район, района, районе |
+| `унде` | 2.45x | 10 contexts | кундем, кундемна, кундемже |
+| `альн` | 1.70x | 25 contexts | дальний, дальние, вокально |
+| `енно` | 1.95x | 16 contexts | фенно, именно, военно |
+| `кунд` | 2.26x | 9 contexts | кунда, кундем, секунд |
+| `лект` | 1.38x | 36 contexts | лекте, лектыш, лектыт |
+| `верл` | 2.01x | 8 contexts | верла, верлам, уверла |
+
+### 6.4 Affix Compatibility (Co-occurrence)
+
+This table shows which prefixes and suffixes most frequently co-occur on the same stems, revealing the 'stacking' rules of the language's morphology.
+
+| Prefix | Suffix | Frequency | Examples |
+|--------|--------|-----------|----------|
+| `-к` | `-е` | 122 words | комна��е, каҥашыме |
+| `-п` | `-е` | 121 words | правление, периодике |
+| `-к` | `-н` | 109 words | клапан, катян |
+| `-с` | `-е` | 90 words | савырнымыже, следовательже |
+| `-п` | `-н` | 71 words | пӧлкажын, пуртыман |
+| `-с` | `-н` | 69 words | скревын, савырашлан |
+| `-к` | `-о` | 69 words | колжо, кузьменко |
+| `-т` | `-е` | 65 words | тиде, тюркское |
+| `-к` | `-а` | 63 words | куклина, коведяева |
+| `-м` | `-н` | 60 words | мардежан, музыкан |
+
+### 6.5 Recursive Morpheme Segmentation
+
+Using **Recursive Hierarchical Substitutability**, we decompose complex words into their constituent morphemes. This approach handles nested affixes (e.g., `prefix-prefix-root-suffix`).
+
+| Word | Suggested Split | Confidence | Stem |
+|------|-----------------|------------|------|
+| автономный | **`автоном-н-ый`** | 7.5 | `н` |
+| диалектный | **`диалект-н-ый`** | 7.5 | `н` |
+| отвлеченный | **`отвлечен-н-ый`** | 7.5 | `н` |
+| министертвын | **`министерт-в-ын`** | 7.5 | `в` |
+| всемарийском | **`в-се-марийском`** | 7.5 | `марийском` |
+| материалах | **`материал-а-х`** | 7.5 | `а` |
+| фильмыште | **`фильм-ыш-те`** | 6.0 | `фильм` |
+| биологийын | **`биолог-ий-ын`** | 6.0 | `биолог` |
+| тунемыныт | **`тунем-ын-ыт`** | 6.0 | `тунем` |
+| комплексыште | **`комплекс-ыш-те`** | 6.0 | `комплекс` |
+| абхазийын | **`абхаз-ий-ын`** | 6.0 | `абхаз` |
+| каҥашымаш | **`каҥаш-ым-аш`** | 6.0 | `каҥаш` |
+| шотландийын | **`шотланд-ий-ын`** | 6.0 | `шотланд` |
+| философийже | **`философ-ий-же`** | 6.0 | `философ` |
+| вашталтымаш | **`вашталт-ым-аш`** | 6.0 | `вашталт` |
+
+### 6.6 Linguistic Interpretation
+
+> **Automated Insight:**
+The language Eastern Mari shows high morphological productivity. The subword models are significantly more efficient than word models, suggesting a rich system of affixation or compounding.
+
+> **Note on Idiomaticity:** The high Idiomaticity Gap suggests a large number of frequent multi-word expressions or formulaic sequences that are statistically distinct from their component parts.
+
+---
+## 7. Summary & Recommendations
+
+![Performance Dashboard](visualizations/performance_dashboard.png)
+
+### Production Recommendations
+
+| Component | Recommended | Rationale |
+|-----------|-------------|-----------|
+| Tokenizer | **64k BPE** | Best compression (4.34x) |
+| N-gram | **2-gram** | Lowest perplexity (439) |
+| Markov | **Context-4** | Highest predictability (96.1%) |
+| Embeddings | **100d** | Balanced semantic capture and isotropy |
+
+
+---
+## Appendix: Metrics Glossary & Interpretation Guide
+
+This section provides definitions, intuitions, and guidance for interpreting the metrics used throughout this report.
+
+### Tokenizer Metrics
+
+**Compression Ratio**
+> *Definition:* The ratio of characters to tokens (chars/token). Measures how efficiently the tokenizer represents text.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Higher compression means fewer tokens needed to represent the same text, reducing sequence lengths for downstream models. A 3x compression means ~3 characters per token on average.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Higher is generally better for efficiency, but extremely high compression may indicate overly aggressive merging that loses morphological information.
+
+**Average Token Length (Fertility)**
+> *Definition:* Mean number of characters per token produced by the tokenizer.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Reflects the granularity of tokenization. Longer tokens capture more context but may struggle with rare words; shorter tokens are more flexible but increase sequence length.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Balance between 2-5 characters for most languages. Arabic/morphologically-rich languages may benefit from slightly longer tokens.
+
+**Unknown Token Rate (OOV Rate)**
+> *Definition:* Percentage of tokens that map to the unknown/UNK token, indicating words the tokenizer cannot represent.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Lower OOV means better vocabulary coverage. High OOV indicates the tokenizer encounters many unseen character sequences.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Below 1% is excellent; below 5% is acceptable. BPE tokenizers typically achieve very low OOV due to subword fallback.
+
+### N-gram Model Metrics
+
+**Perplexity**
+> *Definition:* Measures how "surprised" the model is by test data. Mathematically: 2^(cross-entropy). Lower values indicate better prediction.
+>
+> *Intuition:* If perplexity is 100, the model is as uncertain as if choosing uniformly among 100 options at each step. A perplexity of 10 means effectively choosing among 10 equally likely options.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Lower is better. Perplexity decreases with larger n-grams (more context). Values vary widely by language and corpus size.
+
+**Entropy**
+> *Definition:* Average information content (in bits) needed to encode the next token given the context. Related to perplexity: perplexity = 2^entropy.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High entropy means high uncertainty/randomness; low entropy means predictable patterns. Natural language typically has entropy between 1-4 bits per character.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Lower entropy indicates more predictable text patterns. Entropy should decrease as n-gram size increases.
+
+**Coverage (Top-K)**
+> *Definition:* Percentage of corpus occurrences explained by the top K most frequent n-grams.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High coverage with few patterns indicates repetitive/formulaic text; low coverage suggests diverse vocabulary usage.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Depends on use case. For language modeling, moderate coverage (40-60% with top-1000) is typical for natural text.
+
+### Markov Chain Metrics
+
+**Average Entropy**
+> *Definition:* Mean entropy across all contexts, measuring average uncertainty in next-word prediction.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Lower entropy means the model is more confident about what comes next. Context-1 has high entropy (many possible next words); Context-4 has low entropy (few likely continuations).
+>
+> *What to seek:* Decreasing entropy with larger context sizes. Very low entropy (<0.1) indicates highly deterministic transitions.
+
+**Branching Factor**
+> *Definition:* Average number of unique next tokens observed for each context.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High branching = many possible continuations (flexible but uncertain); low branching = few options (predictable but potentially repetitive).
+>
+> *What to seek:* Branching factor should decrease with context size. Values near 1.0 indicate nearly deterministic chains.
+
+**Predictability**
+> *Definition:* Derived metric: (1 - normalized_entropy) × 100%. Indicates how deterministic the model's predictions are.
+>
+> *Intuition:* 100% predictability means the next word is always certain; 0% means completely random. Real text falls between these extremes.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Higher predictability for text generation quality, but too high (>98%) may produce repetitive output.
+
+### Vocabulary & Zipf's Law Metrics
+
+**Zipf's Coefficient**
+> *Definition:* The slope of the log-log plot of word frequency vs. rank. Zipf's law predicts this should be approximately -1.
+>
+> *Intuition:* A coefficient near -1 indicates the corpus follows natural language patterns where a few words are very common and most words are rare.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Values between -0.8 and -1.2 indicate healthy natural language distribution. Deviations may suggest domain-specific or artificial text.
+
+**R² (Coefficient of Determination)**
+> *Definition:* Measures how well the linear fit explains the frequency-rank relationship. Ranges from 0 to 1.
+>
+> *Intuition:* R² near 1.0 means the data closely follows Zipf's law; lower values indicate deviation from expected word frequency patterns.
+>
+> *What to seek:* R² > 0.95 is excellent; > 0.99 indicates near-perfect Zipf adherence typical of large natural corpora.
+
+**Vocabulary Coverage**
+> *Definition:* Cumulative percentage of corpus tokens accounted for by the top N words.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Shows how concentrated word usage is. If top-100 words cover 50% of text, the corpus relies heavily on common words.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Top-100 covering 30-50% is typical. Higher coverage indicates more repetitive text; lower suggests richer vocabulary.
+
+### Word Embedding Metrics
+
+**Isotropy**
+> *Definition:* Measures how uniformly distributed vectors are in the embedding space. Computed as the ratio of minimum to maximum singular values.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High isotropy (near 1.0) means vectors spread evenly in all directions; low isotropy means vectors cluster in certain directions, reducing expressiveness.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Higher isotropy generally indicates better-quality embeddings. Values > 0.1 are reasonable; > 0.3 is good. Lower-dimensional embeddings tend to have higher isotropy.
+
+**Average Norm**
+> *Definition:* Mean magnitude (L2 norm) of word vectors in the embedding space.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Indicates the typical "length" of vectors. Consistent norms suggest stable training; high variance may indicate some words are undertrained.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Relatively consistent norms across models. The absolute value matters less than consistency (low std deviation).
+
+**Cosine Similarity**
+> *Definition:* Measures angular similarity between vectors, ranging from -1 (opposite) to 1 (identical direction).
+>
+> *Intuition:* Words with similar meanings should have high cosine similarity. This is the standard metric for semantic relatedness in embeddings.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Semantically related words should score > 0.5; unrelated words should be near 0. Synonyms often score > 0.7.
+
+**t-SNE Visualization**
+> *Definition:* t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding - a dimensionality reduction technique that preserves local structure for visualization.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Clusters in t-SNE plots indicate groups of semantically related words. Spread indicates vocabulary diversity; tight clusters suggest semantic coherence.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Meaningful clusters (e.g., numbers together, verbs together). Avoid over-interpreting distances - t-SNE preserves local, not global, structure.
+
+### General Interpretation Guidelines
+
+1. **Compare within model families:** Metrics are most meaningful when comparing models of the same type (e.g., 8k vs 64k tokenizer).
+2. **Consider trade-offs:** Better performance on one metric often comes at the cost of another (e.g., compression vs. OOV rate).
+3. **Context matters:** Optimal values depend on downstream tasks. Text generation may prioritize different metrics than classification.
+4. **Corpus influence:** All metrics are influenced by corpus characteristics. Wikipedia text differs from social media or literature.
+5. **Language-specific patterns:** Morphologically rich languages (like Arabic) may show different optimal ranges than analytic languages.
+
+
+### Visualizations Index
+
+| Visualization | Description |
+|---------------|-------------|
+| Tokenizer Compression | Compression ratios by vocabulary size |
+| Tokenizer Fertility | Average token length by vocabulary |
+| Tokenizer OOV | Unknown token rates |
+| Tokenizer Total Tokens | Total tokens by vocabulary |
+| N-gram Perplexity | Perplexity by n-gram size |
+| N-gram Entropy | Entropy by n-gram size |
+| N-gram Coverage | Top pattern coverage |
+| N-gram Unique | Unique n-gram counts |
+| Markov Entropy | Entropy by context size |
+| Markov Branching | Branching factor by context |
+| Markov Contexts | Unique context counts |
+| Zipf's Law | Frequency-rank distribution with fit |
+| Vocab Frequency | Word frequency distribution |
+| Top 20 Words | Most frequent words |
+| Vocab Coverage | Cumulative coverage curve |
+| Embedding Isotropy | Vector space uniformity |
+| Embedding Norms | Vector magnitude distribution |
+| Embedding Similarity | Word similarity heatmap |
+| Nearest Neighbors | Similar words for key terms |
+| t-SNE Words | 2D word embedding visualization |
+| t-SNE Sentences | 2D sentence embedding visualization |
+| Position Encoding | Encoding method comparison |
+| Model Sizes | Storage requirements |
+| Performance Dashboard | Comprehensive performance overview |
+
+---
+## About This Project
+
+### Data Source
+
+Models trained on [wikipedia-monthly](https://huggingface.co/datasets/omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly) - a monthly snapshot of Wikipedia articles across 300+ languages.
+
+### Project
+
+A project by **[Wikilangs](https://wikilangs.org)** - Open-source NLP models for every Wikipedia language.
+
+### Maintainer
+
+[Omar Kamali](https://omarkamali.com) - [Omneity Labs](https://omneitylabs.com)
+
+### Citation
+
+If you use these models in your research, please cite:
+
+```bibtex
+@misc{wikilangs2025,
+  author = {Kamali, Omar},
+  title = {Wikilangs: Open NLP Models for Wikipedia Languages},
+  year = {2025},
+  doi = {10.5281/zenodo.18073153},
+  publisher = {Zenodo},
+  url = {https://huggingface.co/wikilangs}
+  institution = {Omneity Labs}
+}
+```
+
+### License
+
+MIT License - Free for academic and commercial use.
+
+### Links
+
+- 🌐 Website: [wikilangs.org](https://wikilangs.org)
+- 🤗 Models: [huggingface.co/wikilangs](https://huggingface.co/wikilangs)
+- 📊 Data: [wikipedia-monthly](https://huggingface.co/datasets/omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly)
+- 👤 Author: [Omar Kamali](https://huggingface.co/omarkamali)
+- 🤝 Sponsor: [Featherless AI](https://featherless.ai)
+---
+*Generated by Wikilangs Models Pipeline*
+
+*Report Date: 2026-01-10 11:49:08*

models/embeddings/aligned/mhr_128d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:42ffe1bf6aaad28614885100f1f2e0a50c12c84026a954147208d02feb7addbf
+size 1048425610

models/embeddings/aligned/mhr_128d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "mhr", "dim": 128, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": true}

models/embeddings/aligned/mhr_128d.projection.npy

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:990cf5656544b9197ba974682f57863c3c0db39592576922ea5a148ecce6b775
+size 65664

models/embeddings/aligned/mhr_128d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+{
+  "language": "mhr",
+  "dimension": 128,
+  "version": "aligned",
+  "hub_language": "en",
+  "seed_vocab_size": 2508,
+  "vocab_size": 23317
+}

models/embeddings/aligned/mhr_32d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:ef6055de4cfcccab67b9b10a50a3ebf929b45f86ea662db8ba49a7902f679404
+size 262518154

models/embeddings/aligned/mhr_32d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "mhr", "dim": 32, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": true}

models/embeddings/aligned/mhr_32d.projection.npy

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:7b568dacfebebc392496190d7c26e387d639e2550321338c72c55ac0307d4851
+size 4224

models/embeddings/aligned/mhr_32d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+{
+  "language": "mhr",
+  "dimension": 32,
+  "version": "aligned",
+  "hub_language": "en",
+  "seed_vocab_size": 2508,
+  "vocab_size": 23317
+}

models/embeddings/aligned/mhr_64d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:d4d4885a4f9f10e21e8d71396c411bfa2d7930e9f0cfb831b673100e29ec311b
+size 524487306

models/embeddings/aligned/mhr_64d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "mhr", "dim": 64, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": true}

models/embeddings/aligned/mhr_64d.projection.npy

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:17058277e79d5658d74f0d451418a0ca9b2438ba6f818dc5c395330c8b83c14c
+size 16512

models/embeddings/aligned/mhr_64d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+{
+  "language": "mhr",
+  "dimension": 64,
+  "version": "aligned",
+  "hub_language": "en",
+  "seed_vocab_size": 2508,
+  "vocab_size": 23317
+}

models/embeddings/monolingual/mhr_128d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:42ffe1bf6aaad28614885100f1f2e0a50c12c84026a954147208d02feb7addbf
+size 1048425610

models/embeddings/monolingual/mhr_128d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "mhr", "dim": 128, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": false}

models/embeddings/monolingual/mhr_128d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+{
+  "language": "mhr",
+  "dimension": 128,
+  "version": "monolingual",
+  "training_params": {
+    "algorithm": "skipgram",
+    "min_count": 5,
+    "window": 5,
+    "negative": 5,
+    "epochs": 5,
+    "encoding_method": "rope",
+    "dim": 128,
+    "threads": 5
+  },
+  "vocab_size": 23317
+}

models/embeddings/monolingual/mhr_32d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:ef6055de4cfcccab67b9b10a50a3ebf929b45f86ea662db8ba49a7902f679404
+size 262518154

models/embeddings/monolingual/mhr_32d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "mhr", "dim": 32, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": false}

models/embeddings/monolingual/mhr_32d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+{
+  "language": "mhr",
+  "dimension": 32,
+  "version": "monolingual",
+  "training_params": {
+    "algorithm": "skipgram",
+    "min_count": 5,
+    "window": 5,
+    "negative": 5,
+    "epochs": 5,
+    "encoding_method": "rope",
+    "dim": 32,
+    "threads": 5
+  },
+  "vocab_size": 23317
+}

models/embeddings/monolingual/mhr_64d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:d4d4885a4f9f10e21e8d71396c411bfa2d7930e9f0cfb831b673100e29ec311b
+size 524487306

models/embeddings/monolingual/mhr_64d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "mhr", "dim": 64, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": false}

models/embeddings/monolingual/mhr_64d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+{
+  "language": "mhr",
+  "dimension": 64,
+  "version": "monolingual",
+  "training_params": {
+    "algorithm": "skipgram",
+    "min_count": 5,
+    "window": 5,
+    "negative": 5,
+    "epochs": 5,
+    "encoding_method": "rope",
+    "dim": 64,
+    "threads": 5
+  },
+  "vocab_size": 23317
+}

models/subword_markov/mhr_markov_ctx1_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:3df053f385d40dcf4885fc3dc5c572da826f0abd0dc3d481dc15d157d43dfc3c
+size 66864

models/subword_markov/mhr_markov_ctx1_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 1,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "mhr",
+  "unique_contexts": 715,
+  "total_transitions": 10803533
+}

models/subword_markov/mhr_markov_ctx2_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:66c1ff10002c94ddb96644fcf3570aff24436405c99100322a869d8f916dcb2c
+size 482766

models/subword_markov/mhr_markov_ctx2_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 2,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "mhr",
+  "unique_contexts": 7818,
+  "total_transitions": 10792765
+}

models/subword_markov/mhr_markov_ctx3_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:014405db49e76ff9bd24fc8dcc3a9724ef4a24da35030f5d94be3ced1cc4d188
+size 1912847

models/subword_markov/mhr_markov_ctx3_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 3,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "mhr",
+  "unique_contexts": 58298,
+  "total_transitions": 10781997
+}

models/subword_markov/mhr_markov_ctx4_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:7a4ae13c7a47be56497cc8f3b5641c16a29be720c9f74c52699ce72544338cfa
+size 5996206

models/subword_markov/mhr_markov_ctx4_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 4,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "mhr",
+  "unique_contexts": 260070,
+  "total_transitions": 10771229
+}

models/subword_ngram/mhr_2gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:3542a38ecd08c27a9ef0ecb0ce4bd2a821e49c9dc04014d0d2d4c4f8ae764538
+size 55901

models/subword_ngram/mhr_2gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 2,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "mhr",
+  "unique_ngrams": 3878,
+  "total_ngrams": 10803533
+}

models/subword_ngram/mhr_3gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:c6799c18bd2db177710ec211a8b89e788cb780e96ccf79e52b9475612129dec8
+size 456524

models/subword_ngram/mhr_3gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 3,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "mhr",
+  "unique_ngrams": 33949,
+  "total_ngrams": 10792765
+}

models/subword_ngram/mhr_4gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:722b8846cced99eb126c1d4c246bd2d02177c9b40e559e81aebd3c6816af50b7
+size 2008046

models/subword_ngram/mhr_4gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 4,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "mhr",
+  "unique_ngrams": 159935,
+  "total_ngrams": 10781997
+}

models/subword_ngram/mhr_5gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:b302f82d1a3bcc2ffcccce1347a4810def2dda685b1b5abc3518f79b38a2c7f6
+size 4793488

models/subword_ngram/mhr_5gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 5,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "mhr",
+  "unique_ngrams": 355981,
+  "total_ngrams": 10771229
+}

models/tokenizer/mhr_tokenizer_16k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:5244955b8cf46845aa2e9bcaeb203def763ab5696a0f3158f6bf6f3e2b03f492
+size 574076

models/tokenizer/mhr_tokenizer_32k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:6bce3a94eb1816ae63cd8c4f65bd2b453e8782e662e8b87da6265b958f6d1fa0
+size 917096

models/tokenizer/mhr_tokenizer_64k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:394e463a454de50290ee2f4b64f29c1d547640353ee0f2ff108063a30a64c44f
+size 1668701

models/tokenizer/mhr_tokenizer_8k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:3e5e1df76e01d2629973289b3063165adc049b6918dd14691a66779a39e5529a
+size 404123

models/vocabulary/mhr_vocabulary.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:75b5e83e0ed46fd4d5c387540ed56b27c17bb57b6048cfe9c9db3218875b87b9
+size 939354

models/vocabulary/mhr_vocabulary_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+{
+  "language": "mhr",
+  "vocabulary_size": 48490,
+  "variant": "full",
+  "statistics": {
+    "type_token_ratio": 0.07367995599068702,
+    "coverage": {
+      "top_100": 0.34921968206230436,
+      "top_1000": 0.6447525753921766,
+      "top_5000": 0.8076556298160406,
+      "top_10000": 0.8628185866715805
+    },
+    "hapax_count": 61069,
+    "hapax_ratio": 0.5574074243101891,
+    "total_documents": 10768
+  }
+}