Upload all models and assets for pcd (latest)

.gitattributes

@@ -33,3 +33,10 @@ saved_model/**/* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *.zip filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *.zst filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *tfevents* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/embedding_similarity.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/embedding_tsne_multilingual.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/performance_dashboard.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/position_encoding_comparison.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/tsne_sentences.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/tsne_words.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/zipf_law.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text

README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,775 @@
+---
+language: pcd
+language_name: Picard
+language_family: romance_galloitalic
+tags:
+  - wikilangs
+  - nlp
+  - tokenizer
+  - embeddings
+  - n-gram
+  - markov
+  - wikipedia
+  - feature-extraction
+  - sentence-similarity
+  - tokenization
+  - n-grams
+  - markov-chain
+  - text-mining
+  - fasttext
+  - babelvec
+  - vocabulous
+  - vocabulary
+  - monolingual
+  - family-romance_galloitalic
+license: mit
+library_name: wikilangs
+pipeline_tag: text-generation
+datasets:
+  - omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly
+dataset_info:
+  name: wikipedia-monthly
+  description: Monthly snapshots of Wikipedia articles across 300+ languages
+metrics:
+  - name: best_compression_ratio
+    type: compression
+    value: 3.953
+  - name: best_isotropy
+    type: isotropy
+    value: 0.8716
+  - name: vocabulary_size
+    type: vocab
+    value: 0
+generated: 2026-01-10
+---
+
+# Picard - Wikilangs Models
+## Comprehensive Research Report & Full Ablation Study
+
+This repository contains NLP models trained and evaluated by Wikilangs, specifically on **Picard** Wikipedia data.
+We analyze tokenizers, n-gram models, Markov chains, vocabulary statistics, and word embeddings.
+
+## 📋 Repository Contents
+
+### Models & Assets
+
+- Tokenizers (8k, 16k, 32k, 64k)
+- N-gram models (2, 3, 4, 5-gram)
+- Markov chains (context of 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5)
+- Subword N-gram and Markov chains
+- Embeddings in various sizes and dimensions (aligned and unaligned)
+- Language Vocabulary
+- Language Statistics
+
+![Performance Dashboard](visualizations/performance_dashboard.png)
+
+### Analysis and Evaluation
+
+- [1. Tokenizer Evaluation](#1-tokenizer-evaluation)
+- [2. N-gram Model Evaluation](#2-n-gram-model-evaluation)
+- [3. Markov Chain Evaluation](#3-markov-chain-evaluation)
+- [4. Vocabulary Analysis](#4-vocabulary-analysis)
+- [5. Word Embeddings Evaluation](#5-word-embeddings-evaluation)
+- [6. Morphological Analysis (Experimental)](#6--morphological-analysis-experimental)
+- [7. Summary & Recommendations](#7-summary--recommendations)
+- [Metrics Glossary](#appendix-metrics-glossary--interpretation-guide)
+- [Visualizations Index](#visualizations-index)
+
+---
+## 1. Tokenizer Evaluation
+
+![Tokenizer Compression](visualizations/tokenizer_compression.png)
+
+![Tokenizer Fertility](visualizations/tokenizer_fertility.png)
+
+![Tokenizer OOV](visualizations/tokenizer_oov.png)
+
+![Total Tokens](visualizations/tokenizer_total_tokens.png)
+
+### Results
+
+| Vocab Size | Compression | Avg Token Len | UNK Rate | Total Tokens |
+|------------|-------------|---------------|----------|--------------|
+| **8k** | 3.181x | 3.18 | 0.1032% | 391,604 |
+| **16k** | 3.467x | 3.47 | 0.1124% | 359,330 |
+| **32k** | 3.721x | 3.72 | 0.1207% | 334,772 |
+| **64k** | 3.953x 🏆 | 3.96 | 0.1282% | 315,141 |
+
+### Tokenization Examples
+
+Below are sample sentences tokenized with each vocabulary size:
+
+**Sample 1:** `Mòn·nhioe`d rozhioe , Moénieu des rosieus o Pleupleu, Diåle (Emberiza schoeniclu...`
+
+| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
+|-------|--------|-------|
+| 8k | `▁m òn · n h ioe ` d ▁ro z ... (+36 more)` | 46 |
+| 16k | `▁m òn · nh ioe ` d ▁ro zh ioe ... (+31 more)` | 41 |
+| 32k | `▁m òn · nhioe ` d ▁ro zh ioe ▁, ... (+25 more)` | 35 |
+| 64k | `▁mòn · nhioe ` d ▁rozhioe ▁, ▁moénieu ▁des ▁ros ... (+18 more)` | 28 |
+
+**Sample 2:** `Charles Perthane - ch'est un écrivin picard dé Tournai. Pourménade à kain Référi...`
+
+| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
+|-------|--------|-------|
+| 8k | `▁charles ▁pert h ane ▁- ▁ch ' est ▁un ▁écrivin ... (+24 more)` | 34 |
+| 16k | `▁charles ▁pert h ane ▁- ▁ch ' est ▁un ▁écrivin ... (+23 more)` | 33 |
+| 32k | `▁charles ▁pert hane ▁- ▁ch ' est ▁un ▁écrivin ▁picard ... (+22 more)` | 32 |
+| 64k | `▁charles ▁pert hane ▁- ▁ch ' est ▁un ▁écrivin ▁picard ... (+21 more)` | 31 |
+
+**Sample 3:** `Is pinstte eq l’Église al est otchultèe per l’Église modernisse d’aprés Vatican ...`
+
+| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
+|-------|--------|-------|
+| 8k | `▁is ▁pins tte ▁eq ▁l ’ église ▁al ▁est ▁ot ... (+16 more)` | 26 |
+| 16k | `▁is ▁pins tte ▁eq ▁l ’ église ▁al ▁est ▁ot ... (+15 more)` | 25 |
+| 32k | `▁is ▁pinstte ▁eq ▁l ’ église ▁al ▁est ▁ot chult ... (+13 more)` | 23 |
+| 64k | `▁is ▁pinstte ▁eq ▁l ’ église ▁al ▁est ▁ot chultèe ... (+11 more)` | 21 |
+
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Compression:** 64k achieves 3.953x compression
+- **Lowest UNK Rate:** 8k with 0.1032% unknown tokens
+- **Trade-off:** Larger vocabularies improve compression but increase model size
+- **Recommendation:** 32k vocabulary provides optimal balance for production use
+
+---
+## 2. N-gram Model Evaluation
+
+![N-gram Perplexity](visualizations/ngram_perplexity.png)
+
+![N-gram Unique](visualizations/ngram_unique.png)
+
+![N-gram Coverage](visualizations/ngram_coverage.png)
+
+### Results
+
+| N-gram | Variant | Perplexity | Entropy | Unique N-grams | Top-100 Coverage | Top-1000 Coverage |
+|--------|---------|------------|---------|----------------|------------------|-------------------|
+| **2-gram** | Word | 5,005 | 12.29 | 19,806 | 28.0% | 50.5% |
+| **2-gram** | Subword | 313 🏆 | 8.29 | 3,246 | 62.8% | 98.9% |
+| **3-gram** | Word | 6,300 | 12.62 | 26,054 | 29.5% | 46.9% |
+| **3-gram** | Subword | 2,718 | 11.41 | 24,544 | 24.3% | 67.8% |
+| **4-gram** | Word | 12,478 | 13.61 | 49,187 | 26.1% | 38.8% |
+| **4-gram** | Subword | 15,376 | 13.91 | 120,683 | 11.7% | 37.2% |
+| **5-gram** | Word | 8,364 | 13.03 | 36,813 | 30.5% | 43.5% |
+| **5-gram** | Subword | 51,133 | 15.64 | 290,118 | 7.4% | 24.2% |
+
+### Top 5 N-grams by Size
+
+**2-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `ch est` | 7,744 |
+| 2 | `et pi` | 4,190 |
+| 3 | `pi référinches` | 3,217 |
+| 4 | `notes pi` | 3,203 |
+| 5 | `dins l` | 3,133 |
+
+**3-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `notes pi référinches` | 3,191 |
+| 2 | `ch est un` | 2,136 |
+| 3 | `pas d caleus` | 2,130 |
+| 4 | `pi référinches loïens` | 1,891 |
+| 5 | `référinches loïens intarnètes` | 1,886 |
+
+**4-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `notes pi référinches loïens` | 1,887 |
+| 2 | `pi référinches loïens intarnètes` | 1,873 |
+| 3 | `dech pas d caleus` | 1,722 |
+| 4 | `pi dins l région` | 1,656 |
+| 5 | `monumints pi lius d` | 938 |
+
+**5-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `notes pi référinches loïens intarnètes` | 1,869 |
+| 2 | `chés monumints pi lius d` | 937 |
+| 3 | `monumints pi lius d mémoére` | 937 |
+| 4 | `d caleus pi dins l` | 864 |
+| 5 | `pas d caleus pi dins` | 864 |
+
+**2-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `e _` | 155,352 |
+| 2 | `s _` | 129,694 |
+| 3 | `i n` | 104,008 |
+| 4 | `_ d` | 100,660 |
+| 5 | `c h` | 91,456 |
+
+**3-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `e s _` | 51,811 |
+| 2 | `_ c h` | 40,114 |
+| 3 | `_ d e` | 31,189 |
+| 4 | `_ p i` | 28,519 |
+| 5 | `i n _` | 27,112 |
+
+**4-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `_ p i _` | 16,853 |
+| 2 | `_ c h '` | 15,871 |
+| 3 | `e s t _` | 13,583 |
+| 4 | `_ i n _` | 12,048 |
+| 5 | `i n s _` | 10,867 |
+
+**5-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `c h é s _` | 9,953 |
+| 2 | `_ c h é s` | 8,355 |
+| 3 | `d i n s _` | 8,136 |
+| 4 | `_ d i n s` | 8,043 |
+| 5 | `_ c h ' _` | 7,242 |
+
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Perplexity:** 2-gram (subword) with 313
+- **Entropy Trend:** Decreases with larger n-grams (more predictable)
+- **Coverage:** Top-1000 patterns cover ~24% of corpus
+- **Recommendation:** 4-gram or 5-gram for best predictive performance
+
+---
+## 3. Markov Chain Evaluation
+
+![Markov Entropy](visualizations/markov_entropy.png)
+
+![Markov Contexts](visualizations/markov_contexts.png)
+
+![Markov Branching](visualizations/markov_branching.png)
+
+### Results
+
+| Context | Variant | Avg Entropy | Perplexity | Branching Factor | Unique Contexts | Predictability |
+|---------|---------|-------------|------------|------------------|-----------------|----------------|
+| **1** | Word | 0.7856 | 1.724 | 4.61 | 96,583 | 21.4% |
+| **1** | Subword | 0.7544 | 1.687 | 5.63 | 1,734 | 24.6% |
+| **2** | Word | 0.2273 | 1.171 | 1.50 | 443,973 | 77.3% |
+| **2** | Subword | 0.8257 | 1.772 | 5.15 | 9,754 | 17.4% |
+| **3** | Word | 0.0801 | 1.057 | 1.13 | 663,556 | 92.0% |
+| **3** | Subword | 0.8058 | 1.748 | 4.07 | 50,194 | 19.4% |
+| **4** | Word | 0.0333 🏆 | 1.023 | 1.05 | 747,772 | 96.7% |
+| **4** | Subword | 0.6621 | 1.582 | 2.81 | 204,083 | 33.8% |
+
+### Generated Text Samples (Word-based)
+
+Below are text samples generated from each word-based Markov chain model:
+
+**Context Size 1:**
+
+1. `d origine pilipin mariés de la contre neutre pi dins no cite intrèe à louis ch`
+2. `l direkcion d mémoére l 15 éd teske ed l région picardie aménistrachon din echl éfant`
+3. `ch dessinateu pi michel hamy emmanuelle poiret amiens mémoires de la rue du nord l aller`
+
+**Context Size 2:**
+
+1. `ch est le romant de la statistique et des environs de béthune sud du soudan dousqu au`
+2. `et pi al o té bérzillée pindint l batale d adville jean luc vigneux présinte el langue`
+3. `notes pi référinches loïens intarnètes catiau l gare pérnes camblin anchiène brasserie malterie dite...`
+
+**Context Size 3:**
+
+1. `notes pi référinches loïens intarnètes hédeuville dseur ch site éd l institut géographique national ...`
+2. `ch est un anchien ju d cartes notes l dimainch j allos au cabaret p pou jwer au`
+3. `pi référinches loïens intarnètes anmérikin`
+
+**Context Size 4:**
+
+1. `notes pi référinches loïens intarnètes rouvroé édseur l site à l institut des textes et manuscrits m...`
+2. `pi référinches loïens intarnètes dech pas d caleus pi dins l région picardie aménistrachon démografi...`
+3. `pi dins l région nord pas d caleus aménistrachon nombe ed gins héraldique parti au premier de gueule...`
+
+
+### Generated Text Samples (Subword-based)
+
+Below are text samples generated from each subword-based Markov chain model:
+
+**Context Size 1:**
+
+1. `_ss_14_e-lité-do`
+2. `e_s_so_lotêtoét_`
+3. `ileshutotr_ccoom`
+
+**Context Size 2:**
+
+1. `e_:_l'be_=_thés_l`
+2. `s_aux_800_0000_mu`
+3. `ins_à_cou,_et_une`
+
+**Context Size 3:**
+
+1. `es_l'in_depuis_var`
+2. `_ch'_eune_rome_cho`
+3. `_del_solisainsch_j`
+
+**Context Size 4:**
+
+1. `_pi_mérachon_diteus`
+2. `_ch'_berg,_imprimin`
+3. `est_eune_parsonnage`
+
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Predictability:** Context-4 (word) with 96.7% predictability
+- **Branching Factor:** Decreases with context size (more deterministic)
+- **Memory Trade-off:** Larger contexts require more storage (204,083 contexts)
+- **Recommendation:** Context-3 or Context-4 for text generation
+
+---
+## 4. Vocabulary Analysis
+
+![Zipf's Law](visualizations/zipf_law.png)
+
+![Top Words](visualizations/top20_words.png)
+
+![Coverage Curve](visualizations/vocab_coverage.png)
+
+### Statistics
+
+| Metric | Value |
+|--------|-------|
+| Vocabulary Size | 42,676 |
+| Total Tokens | 874,727 |
+| Mean Frequency | 20.50 |
+| Median Frequency | 3 |
+| Frequency Std Dev | 309.45 |
+
+### Most Common Words
+
+| Rank | Word | Frequency |
+|------|------|-----------|
+| 1 | d | 30,264 |
+| 2 | l | 24,902 |
+| 3 | ch | 19,929 |
+| 4 | pi | 16,980 |
+| 5 | à | 15,562 |
+| 6 | in | 14,862 |
+| 7 | est | 13,362 |
+| 8 | de | 11,091 |
+| 9 | chés | 9,886 |
+| 10 | et | 9,764 |
+
+### Least Common Words (from vocabulary)
+
+| Rank | Word | Frequency |
+|------|------|-----------|
+| 1 | bondes | 2 |
+| 2 | benezit | 2 |
+| 3 | kukës | 2 |
+| 4 | tortuses | 2 |
+| 5 | tchière | 2 |
+| 6 | commindeu | 2 |
+| 7 | sènes | 2 |
+| 8 | armonista | 2 |
+| 9 | sellerio | 2 |
+| 10 | palerme | 2 |
+
+### Zipf's Law Analysis
+
+| Metric | Value |
+|--------|-------|
+| Zipf Coefficient | 1.0173 |
+| R² (Goodness of Fit) | 0.999106 |
+| Adherence Quality | **excellent** |
+
+### Coverage Analysis
+
+| Top N Words | Coverage |
+|-------------|----------|
+| Top 100 | 44.2% |
+| Top 1,000 | 65.9% |
+| Top 5,000 | 81.3% |
+| Top 10,000 | 87.7% |
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Zipf Compliance:** R²=0.9991 indicates excellent adherence to Zipf's law
+- **High Frequency Dominance:** Top 100 words cover 44.2% of corpus
+- **Long Tail:** 32,676 words needed for remaining 12.3% coverage
+
+---
+## 5. Word Embeddings Evaluation
+
+![Embedding Isotropy](visualizations/embedding_isotropy.png)
+
+![Similarity Matrix](visualizations/embedding_similarity.png)
+
+![t-SNE Words](visualizations/tsne_words.png)
+
+![t-SNE Sentences](visualizations/tsne_sentences.png)
+
+
+### 5.1 Cross-Lingual Alignment
+
+![Alignment Quality](visualizations/embedding_alignment_quality.png)
+
+![Multilingual t-SNE](visualizations/embedding_tsne_multilingual.png)
+
+
+### 5.2 Model Comparison
+
+| Model | Dimension | Isotropy | Semantic Density | Alignment R@1 | Alignment R@10 |
+|-------|-----------|----------|------------------|---------------|----------------|
+| **mono_32d** | 32 | 0.8716 | 0.3203 | N/A | N/A |
+| **mono_64d** | 64 | 0.6802 | 0.2753 | N/A | N/A |
+| **mono_128d** | 128 | 0.2264 | 0.2645 | N/A | N/A |
+| **aligned_32d** | 32 | 0.8716 🏆 | 0.3221 | 0.0520 | 0.2580 |
+| **aligned_64d** | 64 | 0.6802 | 0.2726 | 0.0720 | 0.3580 |
+| **aligned_128d** | 128 | 0.2264 | 0.2727 | 0.1360 | 0.4200 |
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Isotropy:** aligned_32d with 0.8716 (more uniform distribution)
+- **Semantic Density:** Average pairwise similarity of 0.2879. Lower values indicate better semantic separation.
+- **Alignment Quality:** Aligned models achieve up to 13.6% R@1 in cross-lingual retrieval.
+- **Recommendation:** 128d aligned for best cross-lingual performance
+
+---
+## 6.  Morphological Analysis (Experimental)
+
+This section presents an automated morphological analysis derived from the statistical divergence between word-level and subword-level models. By analyzing where subword predictability spikes and where word-level coverage fails, we can infer linguistic structures without supervised data.
+
+### 6.1 Productivity & Complexity
+
+| Metric | Value | Interpretation | Recommendation |
+|--------|-------|----------------|----------------|
+| Productivity Index | **5.000** | High morphological productivity | Reliable analysis |
+| Idiomaticity Gap | **0.802** | High formulaic/idiomatic content | - |
+
+### 6.2 Affix Inventory (Productive Units)
+
+These are the most productive prefixes and suffixes identified by sampling the vocabulary for global substitutability patterns. A unit is considered an affix if stripping it leaves a valid stem that appears in other contexts.
+
+#### Productive Prefixes
+| Prefix | Examples |
+|--------|----------|
+| `-a` | arcs, atestè, abistoké |
+| `-c` | cro, camanéter, català |
+| `-s` | symbolisses, sorrus, shahmukhi |
+| `-b` | bonduelle, brochant, bourgache |
+| `-p` | partitchulier, poteries, pintatonikes |
+| `-d` | devenir, description, délibérer |
+| `-m` | moyin, monastique, mêle |
+| `-co` | coin, commintateu, coup |
+
+#### Productive Suffixes
+| Suffix | Examples |
+|--------|----------|
+| `-e` | monastique, linotte, bonduelle |
+| `-s` | poteries, pintatonikes, symbolisses |
+| `-es` | poteries, pintatonikes, symbolisses |
+| `-t` | ressortit, brochant, walincourt |
+| `-n` | moyin, description, heineken |
+| `-r` | devenir, partitchulier, délibérer |
+| `-on` | description, ptilostemon, manillon |
+| `-le` | bonduelle, trémoille, mêle |
+
+### 6.3 Bound Stems (Lexical Roots)
+
+Bound stems are high-frequency subword units that are semantically cohesive but rarely appear as standalone words. These often correspond to the 'core' of a word that requires inflection or derivation to be valid.
+
+| Stem | Cohesion | Substitutability | Examples |
+|------|----------|------------------|----------|
+| `ette` | 1.79x | 114 contexts | bette, vette, mette |
+| `ques` | 1.90x | 74 contexts | aques, quest, vaques |
+| `ranc` | 2.08x | 42 contexts | rance, ranch, franc |
+| `ique` | 1.79x | 75 contexts | mique, pique, niquet |
+| `nche` | 1.71x | 81 contexts | anche, lanche, panche |
+| `anch` | 1.58x | 85 contexts | ranch, anche, lanche |
+| `cion` | 1.97x | 31 contexts | nacion, akcion, accion |
+| `tion` | 1.84x | 29 contexts | action, option, nation |
+| `icar` | 2.13x | 16 contexts | wicar, ricard, picard |
+| `ogra` | 1.67x | 26 contexts | beograd, biografe, ortograf |
+| `rinc` | 1.59x | 28 contexts | prince, frinco, frincs |
+| `cart` | 1.60x | 27 contexts | écart, carta, carte |
+
+### 6.4 Affix Compatibility (Co-occurrence)
+
+This table shows which prefixes and suffixes most frequently co-occur on the same stems, revealing the 'stacking' rules of the language's morphology.
+
+| Prefix | Suffix | Frequency | Examples |
+|--------|--------|-----------|----------|
+| `-c` | `-e` | 205 words | comminde, crozète |
+| `-c` | `-s` | 177 words | camps, cros |
+| `-p` | `-e` | 153 words | pake, prostituèe |
+| `-a` | `-e` | 147 words | academie, amiabe |
+| `-p` | `-s` | 116 words | picus, porions |
+| `-m` | `-e` | 115 words | médiatèke, malade |
+| `-d` | `-e` | 105 words | delgorgue, delepine |
+| `-s` | `-e` | 97 words | sangiovese, solèye |
+| `-m` | `-s` | 95 words | matématikes, mardis |
+| `-a` | `-s` | 93 words | ardennes, anthiusses |
+
+### 6.5 Recursive Morpheme Segmentation
+
+Using **Recursive Hierarchical Substitutability**, we decompose complex words into their constituent morphemes. This approach handles nested affixes (e.g., `prefix-prefix-root-suffix`).
+
+| Word | Suggested Split | Confidence | Stem |
+|------|-----------------|------------|------|
+| essayisse | **`essayis-s-e`** | 7.5 | `s` |
+| alexandrins | **`alexandr-in-s`** | 7.5 | `in` |
+| carcahutes | **`carcahu-t-es`** | 7.5 | `t` |
+| bilderbogen | **`bilderbog-e-n`** | 7.5 | `e` |
+| comminchent | **`comminch-e-nt`** | 7.5 | `e` |
+| conmunnes | **`conmun-n-es`** | 7.5 | `n` |
+| anciennement | **`anciennem-e-nt`** | 7.5 | `e` |
+| kilomètres | **`kilomèt-re-s`** | 7.5 | `re` |
+| lituanien | **`lituani-e-n`** | 7.5 | `e` |
+| albertville | **`albertvi-l-le`** | 7.5 | `l` |
+| stevenson | **`steven-s-on`** | 7.5 | `s` |
+| vanwelkenhuyzen | **`vanwelkenhuyz-e-n`** | 7.5 | `e` |
+| management | **`managem-e-nt`** | 7.5 | `e` |
+| pikardien | **`pikardi-e-n`** | 7.5 | `e` |
+| richesses | **`riches-s-es`** | 7.5 | `s` |
+
+### 6.6 Linguistic Interpretation
+
+> **Automated Insight:**
+The language Picard shows high morphological productivity. The subword models are significantly more efficient than word models, suggesting a rich system of affixation or compounding.
+
+> **Note on Idiomaticity:** The high Idiomaticity Gap suggests a large number of frequent multi-word expressions or formulaic sequences that are statistically distinct from their component parts.
+
+---
+## 7. Summary & Recommendations
+
+![Performance Dashboard](visualizations/performance_dashboard.png)
+
+### Production Recommendations
+
+| Component | Recommended | Rationale |
+|-----------|-------------|-----------|
+| Tokenizer | **64k BPE** | Best compression (3.95x) |
+| N-gram | **2-gram** | Lowest perplexity (313) |
+| Markov | **Context-4** | Highest predictability (96.7%) |
+| Embeddings | **100d** | Balanced semantic capture and isotropy |
+
+
+---
+## Appendix: Metrics Glossary & Interpretation Guide
+
+This section provides definitions, intuitions, and guidance for interpreting the metrics used throughout this report.
+
+### Tokenizer Metrics
+
+**Compression Ratio**
+> *Definition:* The ratio of characters to tokens (chars/token). Measures how efficiently the tokenizer represents text.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Higher compression means fewer tokens needed to represent the same text, reducing sequence lengths for downstream models. A 3x compression means ~3 characters per token on average.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Higher is generally better for efficiency, but extremely high compression may indicate overly aggressive merging that loses morphological information.
+
+**Average Token Length (Fertility)**
+> *Definition:* Mean number of characters per token produced by the tokenizer.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Reflects the granularity of tokenization. Longer tokens capture more context but may struggle with rare words; shorter tokens are more flexible but increase sequence length.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Balance between 2-5 characters for most languages. Arabic/morphologically-rich languages may benefit from slightly longer tokens.
+
+**Unknown Token Rate (OOV Rate)**
+> *Definition:* Percentage of tokens that map to the unknown/UNK token, indicating words the tokenizer cannot represent.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Lower OOV means better vocabulary coverage. High OOV indicates the tokenizer encounters many unseen character sequences.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Below 1% is excellent; below 5% is acceptable. BPE tokenizers typically achieve very low OOV due to subword fallback.
+
+### N-gram Model Metrics
+
+**Perplexity**
+> *Definition:* Measures how "surprised" the model is by test data. Mathematically: 2^(cross-entropy). Lower values indicate better prediction.
+>
+> *Intuition:* If perplexity is 100, the model is as uncertain as if choosing uniformly among 100 options at each step. A perplexity of 10 means effectively choosing among 10 equally likely options.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Lower is better. Perplexity decreases with larger n-grams (more context). Values vary widely by language and corpus size.
+
+**Entropy**
+> *Definition:* Average information content (in bits) needed to encode the next token given the context. Related to perplexity: perplexity = 2^entropy.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High entropy means high uncertainty/randomness; low entropy means predictable patterns. Natural language typically has entropy between 1-4 bits per character.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Lower entropy indicates more predictable text patterns. Entropy should decrease as n-gram size increases.
+
+**Coverage (Top-K)**
+> *Definition:* Percentage of corpus occurrences explained by the top K most frequent n-grams.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High coverage with few patterns indicates repetitive/formulaic text; low coverage suggests diverse vocabulary usage.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Depends on use case. For language modeling, moderate coverage (40-60% with top-1000) is typical for natural text.
+
+### Markov Chain Metrics
+
+**Average Entropy**
+> *Definition:* Mean entropy across all contexts, measuring average uncertainty in next-word prediction.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Lower entropy means the model is more confident about what comes next. Context-1 has high entropy (many possible next words); Context-4 has low entropy (few likely continuations).
+>
+> *What to seek:* Decreasing entropy with larger context sizes. Very low entropy (<0.1) indicates highly deterministic transitions.
+
+**Branching Factor**
+> *Definition:* Average number of unique next tokens observed for each context.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High branching = many possible continuations (flexible but uncertain); low branching = few options (predictable but potentially repetitive).
+>
+> *What to seek:* Branching factor should decrease with context size. Values near 1.0 indicate nearly deterministic chains.
+
+**Predictability**
+> *Definition:* Derived metric: (1 - normalized_entropy) × 100%. Indicates how deterministic the model's predictions are.
+>
+> *Intuition:* 100% predictability means the next word is always certain; 0% means completely random. Real text falls between these extremes.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Higher predictability for text generation quality, but too high (>98%) may produce repetitive output.
+
+### Vocabulary & Zipf's Law Metrics
+
+**Zipf's Coefficient**
+> *Definition:* The slope of the log-log plot of word frequency vs. rank. Zipf's law predicts this should be approximately -1.
+>
+> *Intuition:* A coefficient near -1 indicates the corpus follows natural language patterns where a few words are very common and most words are rare.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Values between -0.8 and -1.2 indicate healthy natural language distribution. Deviations may suggest domain-specific or artificial text.
+
+**R² (Coefficient of Determination)**
+> *Definition:* Measures how well the linear fit explains the frequency-rank relationship. Ranges from 0 to 1.
+>
+> *Intuition:* R² near 1.0 means the data closely follows Zipf's law; lower values indicate deviation from expected word frequency patterns.
+>
+> *What to seek:* R² > 0.95 is excellent; > 0.99 indicates near-perfect Zipf adherence typical of large natural corpora.
+
+**Vocabulary Coverage**
+> *Definition:* Cumulative percentage of corpus tokens accounted for by the top N words.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Shows how concentrated word usage is. If top-100 words cover 50% of text, the corpus relies heavily on common words.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Top-100 covering 30-50% is typical. Higher coverage indicates more repetitive text; lower suggests richer vocabulary.
+
+### Word Embedding Metrics
+
+**Isotropy**
+> *Definition:* Measures how uniformly distributed vectors are in the embedding space. Computed as the ratio of minimum to maximum singular values.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High isotropy (near 1.0) means vectors spread evenly in all directions; low isotropy means vectors cluster in certain directions, reducing expressiveness.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Higher isotropy generally indicates better-quality embeddings. Values > 0.1 are reasonable; > 0.3 is good. Lower-dimensional embeddings tend to have higher isotropy.
+
+**Average Norm**
+> *Definition:* Mean magnitude (L2 norm) of word vectors in the embedding space.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Indicates the typical "length" of vectors. Consistent norms suggest stable training; high variance may indicate some words are undertrained.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Relatively consistent norms across models. The absolute value matters less than consistency (low std deviation).
+
+**Cosine Similarity**
+> *Definition:* Measures angular similarity between vectors, ranging from -1 (opposite) to 1 (identical direction).
+>
+> *Intuition:* Words with similar meanings should have high cosine similarity. This is the standard metric for semantic relatedness in embeddings.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Semantically related words should score > 0.5; unrelated words should be near 0. Synonyms often score > 0.7.
+
+**t-SNE Visualization**
+> *Definition:* t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding - a dimensionality reduction technique that preserves local structure for visualization.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Clusters in t-SNE plots indicate groups of semantically related words. Spread indicates vocabulary diversity; tight clusters suggest semantic coherence.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Meaningful clusters (e.g., numbers together, verbs together). Avoid over-interpreting distances - t-SNE preserves local, not global, structure.
+
+### General Interpretation Guidelines
+
+1. **Compare within model families:** Metrics are most meaningful when comparing models of the same type (e.g., 8k vs 64k tokenizer).
+2. **Consider trade-offs:** Better performance on one metric often comes at the cost of another (e.g., compression vs. OOV rate).
+3. **Context matters:** Optimal values depend on downstream tasks. Text generation may prioritize different metrics than classification.
+4. **Corpus influence:** All metrics are influenced by corpus characteristics. Wikipedia text differs from social media or literature.
+5. **Language-specific patterns:** Morphologically rich languages (like Arabic) may show different optimal ranges than analytic languages.
+
+
+### Visualizations Index
+
+| Visualization | Description |
+|---------------|-------------|
+| Tokenizer Compression | Compression ratios by vocabulary size |
+| Tokenizer Fertility | Average token length by vocabulary |
+| Tokenizer OOV | Unknown token rates |
+| Tokenizer Total Tokens | Total tokens by vocabulary |
+| N-gram Perplexity | Perplexity by n-gram size |
+| N-gram Entropy | Entropy by n-gram size |
+| N-gram Coverage | Top pattern coverage |
+| N-gram Unique | Unique n-gram counts |
+| Markov Entropy | Entropy by context size |
+| Markov Branching | Branching factor by context |
+| Markov Contexts | Unique context counts |
+| Zipf's Law | Frequency-rank distribution with fit |
+| Vocab Frequency | Word frequency distribution |
+| Top 20 Words | Most frequent words |
+| Vocab Coverage | Cumulative coverage curve |
+| Embedding Isotropy | Vector space uniformity |
+| Embedding Norms | Vector magnitude distribution |
+| Embedding Similarity | Word similarity heatmap |
+| Nearest Neighbors | Similar words for key terms |
+| t-SNE Words | 2D word embedding visualization |
+| t-SNE Sentences | 2D sentence embedding visualization |
+| Position Encoding | Encoding method comparison |
+| Model Sizes | Storage requirements |
+| Performance Dashboard | Comprehensive performance overview |
+
+---
+## About This Project
+
+### Data Source
+
+Models trained on [wikipedia-monthly](https://huggingface.co/datasets/omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly) - a monthly snapshot of Wikipedia articles across 300+ languages.
+
+### Project
+
+A project by **[Wikilangs](https://wikilangs.org)** - Open-source NLP models for every Wikipedia language.
+
+### Maintainer
+
+[Omar Kamali](https://omarkamali.com) - [Omneity Labs](https://omneitylabs.com)
+
+### Citation
+
+If you use these models in your research, please cite:
+
+```bibtex
+@misc{wikilangs2025,
+  author = {Kamali, Omar},
+  title = {Wikilangs: Open NLP Models for Wikipedia Languages},
+  year = {2025},
+  doi = {10.5281/zenodo.18073153},
+  publisher = {Zenodo},
+  url = {https://huggingface.co/wikilangs}
+  institution = {Omneity Labs}
+}
+```
+
+### License
+
+MIT License - Free for academic and commercial use.
+
+### Links
+
+- 🌐 Website: [wikilangs.org](https://wikilangs.org)
+- 🤗 Models: [huggingface.co/wikilangs](https://huggingface.co/wikilangs)
+- 📊 Data: [wikipedia-monthly](https://huggingface.co/datasets/omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly)
+- 👤 Author: [Omar Kamali](https://huggingface.co/omarkamali)
+- 🤝 Sponsor: [Featherless AI](https://featherless.ai)
+---
+*Generated by Wikilangs Models Pipeline*
+
+*Report Date: 2026-01-10 17:37:03*

models/embeddings/aligned/pcd_128d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:3ad5f59aa14ed940b1243326ece6535cf43a29155ae785afc9b8a1b93ce02134
+size 1041877433

models/embeddings/aligned/pcd_128d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "pcd", "dim": 128, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": true}

models/embeddings/aligned/pcd_128d.projection.npy

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:b31a54015f2c5a2e3cd9bd70cb085c841c2fddd54f6576c7fe1a1cf6aebd775f
+size 65664

models/embeddings/aligned/pcd_128d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+{
+  "language": "pcd",
+  "dimension": 128,
+  "version": "aligned",
+  "hub_language": "en",
+  "seed_vocab_size": 8257,
+  "vocab_size": 17173
+}

models/embeddings/aligned/pcd_32d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:f92e110203662a07546b66a19e6b5b2fab1443021bbdb4043e7f776c91f195c3
+size 260688569

models/embeddings/aligned/pcd_32d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "pcd", "dim": 32, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": true}

models/embeddings/aligned/pcd_32d.projection.npy

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:f54215b943037a7e5703f7a6af47b60451409c7a191a36020151d39993f10fb9
+size 4224

models/embeddings/aligned/pcd_32d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+{
+  "language": "pcd",
+  "dimension": 32,
+  "version": "aligned",
+  "hub_language": "en",
+  "seed_vocab_size": 8257,
+  "vocab_size": 17173
+}

models/embeddings/aligned/pcd_64d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:d2decfa1da1d0e2fe22614e33d142a934c0cbdf8d156551e62a2f042f38c2bf4
+size 521084857

models/embeddings/aligned/pcd_64d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "pcd", "dim": 64, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": true}

models/embeddings/aligned/pcd_64d.projection.npy

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:246bc59a6be053656de3a3d73ee0fb1992262ea603fd12ee609bd044bc854e50
+size 16512

models/embeddings/aligned/pcd_64d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+{
+  "language": "pcd",
+  "dimension": 64,
+  "version": "aligned",
+  "hub_language": "en",
+  "seed_vocab_size": 8257,
+  "vocab_size": 17173
+}

models/embeddings/monolingual/pcd_128d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:3ad5f59aa14ed940b1243326ece6535cf43a29155ae785afc9b8a1b93ce02134
+size 1041877433

models/embeddings/monolingual/pcd_128d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "pcd", "dim": 128, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": false}

models/embeddings/monolingual/pcd_128d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+{
+  "language": "pcd",
+  "dimension": 128,
+  "version": "monolingual",
+  "training_params": {
+    "algorithm": "skipgram",
+    "min_count": 5,
+    "window": 5,
+    "negative": 5,
+    "epochs": 5,
+    "encoding_method": "rope",
+    "dim": 128,
+    "threads": 5
+  },
+  "vocab_size": 17173
+}

models/embeddings/monolingual/pcd_32d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:f92e110203662a07546b66a19e6b5b2fab1443021bbdb4043e7f776c91f195c3
+size 260688569

models/embeddings/monolingual/pcd_32d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "pcd", "dim": 32, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": false}

models/embeddings/monolingual/pcd_32d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+{
+  "language": "pcd",
+  "dimension": 32,
+  "version": "monolingual",
+  "training_params": {
+    "algorithm": "skipgram",
+    "min_count": 5,
+    "window": 5,
+    "negative": 5,
+    "epochs": 5,
+    "encoding_method": "rope",
+    "dim": 32,
+    "threads": 5
+  },
+  "vocab_size": 17173
+}

models/embeddings/monolingual/pcd_64d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:d2decfa1da1d0e2fe22614e33d142a934c0cbdf8d156551e62a2f042f38c2bf4
+size 521084857

models/embeddings/monolingual/pcd_64d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "pcd", "dim": 64, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": false}

models/embeddings/monolingual/pcd_64d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+{
+  "language": "pcd",
+  "dimension": 64,
+  "version": "monolingual",
+  "training_params": {
+    "algorithm": "skipgram",
+    "min_count": 5,
+    "window": 5,
+    "negative": 5,
+    "epochs": 5,
+    "encoding_method": "rope",
+    "dim": 64,
+    "threads": 5
+  },
+  "vocab_size": 17173
+}

models/subword_markov/pcd_markov_ctx1_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:8741d8ddc8974ca530301077bdb9440feea0acdb679c42eca1065c4152bdc34c
+size 80839

models/subword_markov/pcd_markov_ctx1_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 1,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "pcd",
+  "unique_contexts": 1734,
+  "total_transitions": 5575363
+}

models/subword_markov/pcd_markov_ctx2_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:672c9dca34abb963ad5b86b70edf5d67b84eb75104b1fdfb7bb590866db14827
+size 410163

models/subword_markov/pcd_markov_ctx2_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 2,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "pcd",
+  "unique_contexts": 9754,
+  "total_transitions": 5569389
+}

models/subword_markov/pcd_markov_ctx3_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:141f49991ef8a9af61c1832cad0d0854ddd0051f26b8baa96b09796e0731f1cc
+size 1552017

models/subword_markov/pcd_markov_ctx3_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 3,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "pcd",
+  "unique_contexts": 50194,
+  "total_transitions": 5563415
+}

models/subword_markov/pcd_markov_ctx4_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:26aa10c083d67bfd1794c3d44e5f531f141ad0682954347141c42cd8ba4099c4
+size 4402113

models/subword_markov/pcd_markov_ctx4_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 4,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "pcd",
+  "unique_contexts": 204083,
+  "total_transitions": 5557441
+}

models/subword_ngram/pcd_2gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:fd4f48c809e4b7a72e69b1643d94a241fc10f5016ea4bdb44c48795fef037fc6
+size 43359

models/subword_ngram/pcd_2gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 2,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "pcd",
+  "unique_ngrams": 3246,
+  "total_ngrams": 5575363
+}

models/subword_ngram/pcd_3gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:d1c11d67039f2abb23da8bdae40b41ae9b2ec5b8843c00b6cfaf9c47efd67343
+size 300679

models/subword_ngram/pcd_3gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 3,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "pcd",
+  "unique_ngrams": 24544,
+  "total_ngrams": 5569389
+}

models/subword_ngram/pcd_4gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:ba2c500155ea8be6423aefd9f32a41ee623d8046422db7730aa0b4c2e5f5dd0b
+size 1360387

models/subword_ngram/pcd_4gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 4,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "pcd",
+  "unique_ngrams": 120683,
+  "total_ngrams": 5563415
+}

models/subword_ngram/pcd_5gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:fb524a51444879670718b0d4b7a1dd095c1f06e955d143ed3064db820875f76f
+size 3330529

models/subword_ngram/pcd_5gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 5,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "pcd",
+  "unique_ngrams": 290118,
+  "total_ngrams": 5557441
+}

models/tokenizer/pcd_tokenizer_16k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:200b46656dade570f102df1dda7a0c46aeacc2340b6875f9bd887911aae944eb
+size 504575

models/tokenizer/pcd_tokenizer_32k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:7df230c4e61d1516b40025c1328bd8561319a8b1079fa5b9a0efc2d8d608bc7e
+size 774048

models/tokenizer/pcd_tokenizer_64k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:c87482d4cb6eecfa2dca8f8e19da3d31fb80be6e2b6dde6f2a26cd8de51abdfc
+size 1357049

models/tokenizer/pcd_tokenizer_8k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:8a2d4f39009aed6f4144b36d9a50b834d9f0eba7de2f12e748753188cb12ea9c
+size 370094

models/vocabulary/pcd_vocabulary.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:42fde07e7c58cfded5db478191e53e570d58263d3a6f1ad3533d1aff5aaf1ad2
+size 723226

models/vocabulary/pcd_vocabulary_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+{
+  "language": "pcd",
+  "vocabulary_size": 42676,
+  "variant": "full",
+  "statistics": {
+    "type_token_ratio": 0.10420223978777785,
+    "coverage": {
+      "top_100": 0.4159089098421899,
+      "top_1000": 0.6202717804396461,
+      "top_5000": 0.7653229088387856,
+      "top_10000": 0.8256929626048891
+    },
+    "hapax_count": 54111,
+    "hapax_ratio": 0.5590730160042154,
+    "total_documents": 5974
+  }
+}

models/word_markov/pcd_markov_ctx1_word.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:d36944cbd72ffe587383d7284da6e75b636f2f33b4e0a00a5cfb14f9ddc2fc7c
+size 3602111