Upload all models and assets for sco (latest)

.gitattributes

@@ -33,3 +33,10 @@ saved_model/**/* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *.zip filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *.zst filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *tfevents* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/embedding_similarity.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/embedding_tsne_multilingual.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/performance_dashboard.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/position_encoding_comparison.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/tsne_sentences.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/tsne_words.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/zipf_law.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text

README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,773 @@
+---
+language: sco
+language_name: Scots
+language_family: germanic_west_anglofrisian
+tags:
+  - wikilangs
+  - nlp
+  - tokenizer
+  - embeddings
+  - n-gram
+  - markov
+  - wikipedia
+  - feature-extraction
+  - sentence-similarity
+  - tokenization
+  - n-grams
+  - markov-chain
+  - text-mining
+  - fasttext
+  - babelvec
+  - vocabulous
+  - vocabulary
+  - monolingual
+  - family-germanic_west_anglofrisian
+license: mit
+library_name: wikilangs
+pipeline_tag: text-generation
+datasets:
+  - omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly
+dataset_info:
+  name: wikipedia-monthly
+  description: Monthly snapshots of Wikipedia articles across 300+ languages
+metrics:
+  - name: best_compression_ratio
+    type: compression
+    value: 4.412
+  - name: best_isotropy
+    type: isotropy
+    value: 0.8628
+  - name: vocabulary_size
+    type: vocab
+    value: 0
+generated: 2026-01-10
+---
+
+# Scots - Wikilangs Models
+## Comprehensive Research Report & Full Ablation Study
+
+This repository contains NLP models trained and evaluated by Wikilangs, specifically on **Scots** Wikipedia data.
+We analyze tokenizers, n-gram models, Markov chains, vocabulary statistics, and word embeddings.
+
+## 📋 Repository Contents
+
+### Models & Assets
+
+- Tokenizers (8k, 16k, 32k, 64k)
+- N-gram models (2, 3, 4, 5-gram)
+- Markov chains (context of 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5)
+- Subword N-gram and Markov chains
+- Embeddings in various sizes and dimensions (aligned and unaligned)
+- Language Vocabulary
+- Language Statistics
+
+![Performance Dashboard](visualizations/performance_dashboard.png)
+
+### Analysis and Evaluation
+
+- [1. Tokenizer Evaluation](#1-tokenizer-evaluation)
+- [2. N-gram Model Evaluation](#2-n-gram-model-evaluation)
+- [3. Markov Chain Evaluation](#3-markov-chain-evaluation)
+- [4. Vocabulary Analysis](#4-vocabulary-analysis)
+- [5. Word Embeddings Evaluation](#5-word-embeddings-evaluation)
+- [6. Morphological Analysis (Experimental)](#6--morphological-analysis-experimental)
+- [7. Summary & Recommendations](#7-summary--recommendations)
+- [Metrics Glossary](#appendix-metrics-glossary--interpretation-guide)
+- [Visualizations Index](#visualizations-index)
+
+---
+## 1. Tokenizer Evaluation
+
+![Tokenizer Compression](visualizations/tokenizer_compression.png)
+
+![Tokenizer Fertility](visualizations/tokenizer_fertility.png)
+
+![Tokenizer OOV](visualizations/tokenizer_oov.png)
+
+![Total Tokens](visualizations/tokenizer_total_tokens.png)
+
+### Results
+
+| Vocab Size | Compression | Avg Token Len | UNK Rate | Total Tokens |
+|------------|-------------|---------------|----------|--------------|
+| **8k** | 3.617x | 3.62 | 0.0092% | 577,294 |
+| **16k** | 3.956x | 3.96 | 0.0100% | 527,731 |
+| **32k** | 4.216x | 4.22 | 0.0107% | 495,233 |
+| **64k** | 4.412x 🏆 | 4.41 | 0.0112% | 473,222 |
+
+### Tokenization Examples
+
+Below are sample sentences tokenized with each vocabulary size:
+
+**Sample 1:** `La Cruz is a smaw ceety in the Mexican state o Sinaloa. The ceety reportit 15,65...`
+
+| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
+|-------|--------|-------|
+| 8k | `▁la ▁cruz ▁is ▁a ▁smaw ▁ceety ▁in ▁the ▁mexican ▁state ... (+26 more)` | 36 |
+| 16k | `▁la ▁cruz ▁is ▁a ▁smaw ▁ceety ▁in ▁the ▁mexican ▁state ... (+22 more)` | 32 |
+| 32k | `▁la ▁cruz ▁is ▁a ▁smaw ▁ceety ▁in ▁the ▁mexican ▁state ... (+22 more)` | 32 |
+| 64k | `▁la ▁cruz ▁is ▁a ▁smaw ▁ceety ▁in ▁the ▁mexican ▁state ... (+22 more)` | 32 |
+
+**Sample 2:** `Navalafuente is a municipality o the Commonty o Madrid, Spain. Freemit airtins i...`
+
+| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
+|-------|--------|-------|
+| 8k | `▁naval af u ente ▁is ▁a ▁municipality ▁o ▁the ▁commonty ... (+18 more)` | 28 |
+| 16k | `▁naval af u ente ▁is ▁a ▁municipality ▁o ▁the ▁commonty ... (+18 more)` | 28 |
+| 32k | `▁naval af u ente ▁is ▁a ▁municipality ▁o ▁the ▁commonty ... (+18 more)` | 28 |
+| 64k | `▁naval afu ente ▁is ▁a ▁municipality ▁o ▁the ▁commonty ▁o ... (+17 more)` | 27 |
+
+**Sample 3:** `Magnetite is a rock mineral an ane o the main airn ures. References minerals gro...`
+
+| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
+|-------|--------|-------|
+| 8k | `▁magn et ite ▁is ▁a ▁rock ▁mineral ▁an ▁ane ▁o ... (+24 more)` | 34 |
+| 16k | `▁magnet ite ▁is ▁a ▁rock ▁mineral ▁an ▁ane ▁o ▁the ... (+20 more)` | 30 |
+| 32k | `▁magnet ite ▁is ▁a ▁rock ▁mineral ▁an ▁ane ▁o ▁the ... (+18 more)` | 28 |
+| 64k | `▁magnetite ▁is ▁a ▁rock ▁mineral ▁an ▁ane ▁o ▁the ▁main ... (+14 more)` | 24 |
+
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Compression:** 64k achieves 4.412x compression
+- **Lowest UNK Rate:** 8k with 0.0092% unknown tokens
+- **Trade-off:** Larger vocabularies improve compression but increase model size
+- **Recommendation:** 32k vocabulary provides optimal balance for production use
+
+---
+## 2. N-gram Model Evaluation
+
+![N-gram Perplexity](visualizations/ngram_perplexity.png)
+
+![N-gram Unique](visualizations/ngram_unique.png)
+
+![N-gram Coverage](visualizations/ngram_coverage.png)
+
+### Results
+
+| N-gram | Variant | Perplexity | Entropy | Unique N-grams | Top-100 Coverage | Top-1000 Coverage |
+|--------|---------|------------|---------|----------------|------------------|-------------------|
+| **2-gram** | Word | 26,453 | 14.69 | 140,557 | 16.0% | 32.2% |
+| **2-gram** | Subword | 271 🏆 | 8.08 | 7,416 | 67.7% | 99.0% |
+| **3-gram** | Word | 72,001 | 16.14 | 210,013 | 7.3% | 19.9% |
+| **3-gram** | Subword | 2,416 | 11.24 | 51,687 | 25.6% | 69.9% |
+| **4-gram** | Word | 131,079 | 17.00 | 309,274 | 5.1% | 14.5% |
+| **4-gram** | Subword | 14,275 | 13.80 | 273,093 | 12.8% | 37.3% |
+| **5-gram** | Word | 95,213 | 16.54 | 199,412 | 4.7% | 15.0% |
+| **5-gram** | Subword | 54,670 | 15.74 | 795,931 | 8.2% | 24.3% |
+
+### Top 5 N-grams by Size
+
+**2-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `o the` | 83,237 |
+| 2 | `in the` | 58,596 |
+| 3 | `is a` | 24,631 |
+| 4 | `tae the` | 17,805 |
+| 5 | `an the` | 13,525 |
+
+**3-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `ane o the` | 5,732 |
+| 2 | `references freemit airtins` | 4,456 |
+| 3 | `the unitit states` | 4,149 |
+| 4 | `pairt o the` | 4,120 |
+| 5 | `the province o` | 3,589 |
+
+**4-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `in the province o` | 2,669 |
+| 2 | `o the order o` | 2,501 |
+| 3 | `is ane o the` | 2,083 |
+| 4 | `is a toun an` | 1,707 |
+| 5 | `o the unitit states` | 1,656 |
+
+**5-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `is a toun an municipality` | 1,214 |
+| 2 | `o the order o the` | 1,192 |
+| 3 | `a toun an municipality in` | 966 |
+| 4 | `as o the municipality haed` | 846 |
+| 5 | `o the municipality haed a` | 784 |
+
+**2-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `e _` | 1,050,184 |
+| 2 | `n _` | 810,931 |
+| 3 | `s _` | 775,649 |
+| 4 | `_ t` | 732,959 |
+| 5 | `_ a` | 719,183 |
+
+**3-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `_ t h` | 504,310 |
+| 2 | `t h e` | 474,947 |
+| 3 | `h e _` | 449,929 |
+| 4 | `i n _` | 295,599 |
+| 5 | `_ o _` | 271,843 |
+
+**4-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `_ t h e` | 434,137 |
+| 2 | `t h e _` | 428,262 |
+| 3 | `_ i n _` | 189,422 |
+| 4 | `_ a n _` | 173,723 |
+| 5 | `n _ t h` | 114,460 |
+
+**5-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `_ t h e _` | 418,560 |
+| 2 | `n _ t h e` | 105,154 |
+| 3 | `_ o _ t h` | 87,165 |
+| 4 | `o _ t h e` | 85,549 |
+| 5 | `i n _ t h` | 75,907 |
+
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Perplexity:** 2-gram (subword) with 271
+- **Entropy Trend:** Decreases with larger n-grams (more predictable)
+- **Coverage:** Top-1000 patterns cover ~24% of corpus
+- **Recommendation:** 4-gram or 5-gram for best predictive performance
+
+---
+## 3. Markov Chain Evaluation
+
+![Markov Entropy](visualizations/markov_entropy.png)
+
+![Markov Contexts](visualizations/markov_contexts.png)
+
+![Markov Branching](visualizations/markov_branching.png)
+
+### Results
+
+| Context | Variant | Avg Entropy | Perplexity | Branching Factor | Unique Contexts | Predictability |
+|---------|---------|-------------|------------|------------------|-----------------|----------------|
+| **1** | Word | 0.9277 | 1.902 | 8.10 | 272,309 | 7.2% |
+| **1** | Subword | 1.0662 | 2.094 | 6.39 | 4,231 | 0.0% |
+| **2** | Word | 0.3124 | 1.242 | 1.88 | 2,201,132 | 68.8% |
+| **2** | Subword | 0.7253 | 1.653 | 4.46 | 27,028 | 27.5% |
+| **3** | Word | 0.1197 | 1.086 | 1.24 | 4,131,130 | 88.0% |
+| **3** | Subword | 0.7329 | 1.662 | 3.98 | 120,570 | 26.7% |
+| **4** | Word | 0.0487 🏆 | 1.034 | 1.08 | 5,105,427 | 95.1% |
+| **4** | Subword | 0.6942 | 1.618 | 3.19 | 479,292 | 30.6% |
+
+### Generated Text Samples (Word-based)
+
+Below are text samples generated from each word-based Markov chain model:
+
+**Context Size 1:**
+
+1. `the order of seduction dos veadeirosalto paraíso borbotón la revolucion in the distance rinners male...`
+2. `o san juan mixtepec mixteca region in bages on the horizontal cross o the various schuils`
+3. `in coonty yintian toun the aurie which led mission in australie seestem in its headquarters head`
+
+**Context Size 2:**
+
+1. `o the ceety o madrid an the van province is subdividit intae cantons municipality inhabitants seat l...`
+2. `in the places mentionit in the savinja statistical region name the divide atween the an gan yavne`
+3. `is a roushie mid size hatchback caur frae components made frae its oreeginal name o an alternate`
+
+**Context Size 3:**
+
+1. `ane o the maist strangest player frae osaka in the throu efter the incorporation o ford saf intae`
+2. `references freemit airtins honda warldwide steid honda press library japanese but wi graphical timel...`
+3. `pairt o the province o cuenca cuenca spaingie congress electoral destrict the commune is still no re...`
+
+**Context Size 4:**
+
+1. `in the province o tarragona vilanova de sau toun in the province o enna references`
+2. `o the order o the aztec eagle o the order o meerit o the federal republic o germany o`
+3. `is ane o the original thirteen states the caipital o massachusetts is boston that is an aw the tradi...`
+
+
+### Generated Text Samples (Subword-based)
+
+Below are text samples generated from each subword-based Markov chain model:
+
+**Context Size 1:**
+
+1. `_an's_sir_r_cs-g`
+2. `ee_t_te_tenti_in`
+3. `aprenrothsicanin`
+
+**Context Size 2:**
+
+1. `e_licturichypence`
+2. `n_the_uniage_spe_`
+3. `s_st_rompion_kerm`
+
+**Context Size 3:**
+
+1. `_the_samate_voyar,`
+2. `the_umwhilocht-sou`
+3. `he_cries_airty_o_r`
+
+**Context Size 4:**
+
+1. `_the_elemen_wumman_`
+2. `the_elemen's_pols_p`
+3. `_in_as_the_municipa`
+
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Predictability:** Context-4 (word) with 95.1% predictability
+- **Branching Factor:** Decreases with context size (more deterministic)
+- **Memory Trade-off:** Larger contexts require more storage (479,292 contexts)
+- **Recommendation:** Context-3 or Context-4 for text generation
+
+---
+## 4. Vocabulary Analysis
+
+![Zipf's Law](visualizations/zipf_law.png)
+
+![Top Words](visualizations/top20_words.png)
+
+![Coverage Curve](visualizations/vocab_coverage.png)
+
+### Statistics
+
+| Metric | Value |
+|--------|-------|
+| Vocabulary Size | 123,249 |
+| Total Tokens | 6,164,921 |
+| Mean Frequency | 50.02 |
+| Median Frequency | 4 |
+| Frequency Std Dev | 1749.35 |
+
+### Most Common Words
+
+| Rank | Word | Frequency |
+|------|------|-----------|
+| 1 | the | 427,737 |
+| 2 | o | 273,854 |
+| 3 | in | 193,597 |
+| 4 | an | 176,125 |
+| 5 | a | 119,842 |
+| 6 | is | 93,570 |
+| 7 | tae | 70,765 |
+| 8 | wis | 49,082 |
+| 9 | as | 41,842 |
+| 10 | frae | 34,119 |
+
+### Least Common Words (from vocabulary)
+
+| Rank | Word | Frequency |
+|------|------|-----------|
+| 1 | erlier | 2 |
+| 2 | margules | 2 |
+| 3 | lifshitz | 2 |
+| 4 | lakeith | 2 |
+| 5 | exploder | 2 |
+| 6 | fipresci | 2 |
+| 7 | zubeen | 2 |
+| 8 | beutel | 2 |
+| 9 | badmen | 2 |
+| 10 | taggert | 2 |
+
+### Zipf's Law Analysis
+
+| Metric | Value |
+|--------|-------|
+| Zipf Coefficient | 1.0502 |
+| R² (Goodness of Fit) | 0.993417 |
+| Adherence Quality | **excellent** |
+
+### Coverage Analysis
+
+| Top N Words | Coverage |
+|-------------|----------|
+| Top 100 | 39.5% |
+| Top 1,000 | 63.1% |
+| Top 5,000 | 80.2% |
+| Top 10,000 | 86.5% |
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Zipf Compliance:** R²=0.9934 indicates excellent adherence to Zipf's law
+- **High Frequency Dominance:** Top 100 words cover 39.5% of corpus
+- **Long Tail:** 113,249 words needed for remaining 13.5% coverage
+
+---
+## 5. Word Embeddings Evaluation
+
+![Embedding Isotropy](visualizations/embedding_isotropy.png)
+
+![Similarity Matrix](visualizations/embedding_similarity.png)
+
+![t-SNE Words](visualizations/tsne_words.png)
+
+![t-SNE Sentences](visualizations/tsne_sentences.png)
+
+
+### 5.1 Cross-Lingual Alignment
+
+![Alignment Quality](visualizations/embedding_alignment_quality.png)
+
+![Multilingual t-SNE](visualizations/embedding_tsne_multilingual.png)
+
+
+### 5.2 Model Comparison
+
+| Model | Dimension | Isotropy | Semantic Density | Alignment R@1 | Alignment R@10 |
+|-------|-----------|----------|------------------|---------------|----------------|
+| **mono_32d** | 32 | 0.8628 | 0.3487 | N/A | N/A |
+| **mono_64d** | 64 | 0.8453 | 0.2622 | N/A | N/A |
+| **mono_128d** | 128 | 0.8330 | 0.1921 | N/A | N/A |
+| **aligned_32d** | 32 | 0.8628 🏆 | 0.3373 | 0.4500 | 0.8320 |
+| **aligned_64d** | 64 | 0.8453 | 0.2597 | 0.6080 | 0.8960 |
+| **aligned_128d** | 128 | 0.8330 | 0.1921 | 0.7060 | 0.9300 |
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Isotropy:** aligned_32d with 0.8628 (more uniform distribution)
+- **Semantic Density:** Average pairwise similarity of 0.2653. Lower values indicate better semantic separation.
+- **Alignment Quality:** Aligned models achieve up to 70.6% R@1 in cross-lingual retrieval.
+- **Recommendation:** 128d aligned for best cross-lingual performance
+
+---
+## 6.  Morphological Analysis (Experimental)
+
+This section presents an automated morphological analysis derived from the statistical divergence between word-level and subword-level models. By analyzing where subword predictability spikes and where word-level coverage fails, we can infer linguistic structures without supervised data.
+
+### 6.1 Productivity & Complexity
+
+| Metric | Value | Interpretation | Recommendation |
+|--------|-------|----------------|----------------|
+| Productivity Index | **5.000** | High morphological productivity | Reliable analysis |
+| Idiomaticity Gap | **-0.383** | Low formulaic content | - |
+
+### 6.2 Affix Inventory (Productive Units)
+
+These are the most productive prefixes and suffixes identified by sampling the vocabulary for global substitutability patterns. A unit is considered an affix if stripping it leaves a valid stem that appears in other contexts.
+
+#### Productive Prefixes
+| Prefix | Examples |
+|--------|----------|
+| `-s` | sts, sables, safar |
+| `-a` | armature, abkhazians, ald |
+| `-ma` | mazīnān, manar, materazzi |
+| `-b` | breid, blume, birnie |
+| `-m` | mazīnān, michelangelos, mcqueers |
+| `-t` | tu, tsugaru, tezuka |
+| `-c` | cuiverin, coontin, ceasefire |
+| `-p` | phrase, padmore, polje |
+
+#### Productive Suffixes
+| Suffix | Examples |
+|--------|----------|
+| `-s` | sts, michelangelos, mcqueers |
+| `-n` | cuiverin, mazīnān, focusin |
+| `-e` | phrase, padmore, neale |
+| `-a` | donnacona, tezuka, camara |
+| `-t` | hjärtat, insicht, 145t |
+| `-y` | validity, climatology, horthy |
+| `-d` | ootsauld, breid, liquidated |
+| `-es` | sables, straddles, charlottes |
+
+### 6.3 Bound Stems (Lexical Roots)
+
+Bound stems are high-frequency subword units that are semantically cohesive but rarely appear as standalone words. These often correspond to the 'core' of a word that requires inflection or derivation to be valid.
+
+| Stem | Cohesion | Substitutability | Examples |
+|------|----------|------------------|----------|
+| `eren` | 2.02x | 57 contexts | keren, ferenc, kerend |
+| `ment` | 1.63x | 93 contexts | menta, ament, amenta |
+| `stri` | 1.63x | 89 contexts | strid, strix, strip |
+| `tric` | 1.59x | 71 contexts | trick, nitric, strict |
+| `atio` | 1.62x | 56 contexts | patio, ratio, cation |
+| `atit` | 1.67x | 45 contexts | datit, fatit, matit |
+| `tion` | 1.45x | 78 contexts | cation, nation, action |
+| `estr` | 1.56x | 56 contexts | bestry, vestry, sestra |
+| `alit` | 1.61x | 40 contexts | alita, balita, kalita |
+| `ence` | 1.64x | 37 contexts | fence, pence, dence |
+| `renc` | 1.73x | 27 contexts | renca, ferenc, french |
+| `dest` | 1.66x | 27 contexts | modest, oldest, widest |
+
+### 6.4 Affix Compatibility (Co-occurrence)
+
+This table shows which prefixes and suffixes most frequently co-occur on the same stems, revealing the 'stacking' rules of the language's morphology.
+
+| Prefix | Suffix | Frequency | Examples |
+|--------|--------|-----------|----------|
+| `-c` | `-s` | 129 words | cuevas, colorless |
+| `-a` | `-s` | 95 words | awaurness, aigeiroúses |
+| `-s` | `-s` | 94 words | sanctions, skippers |
+| `-p` | `-s` | 89 words | prowess, pairtisans |
+| `-s` | `-n` | 89 words | samson, sudan |
+| `-c` | `-n` | 64 words | copulation, caryn |
+| `-s` | `-e` | 61 words | sparse, suerte |
+| `-a` | `-e` | 60 words | airsie, australie |
+| `-t` | `-s` | 55 words | termales, trumpeters |
+| `-m` | `-s` | 54 words | makarios, montañas |
+
+### 6.5 Recursive Morpheme Segmentation
+
+Using **Recursive Hierarchical Substitutability**, we decompose complex words into their constituent morphemes. This approach handles nested affixes (e.g., `prefix-prefix-root-suffix`).
+
+| Word | Suggested Split | Confidence | Stem |
+|------|-----------------|------------|------|
+| freistaat | **`freista-a-t`** | 7.5 | `a` |
+| ovulators | **`ovulat-o-rs`** | 7.5 | `o` |
+| cardenden | **`carden-d-en`** | 7.5 | `d` |
+| auldgirth | **`auldgir-t-h`** | 7.5 | `t` |
+| islamists | **`islami-s-ts`** | 7.5 | `s` |
+| steamboats | **`steambo-a-ts`** | 7.5 | `a` |
+| spulyiein | **`spulyi-e-in`** | 7.5 | `e` |
+| carrascosa | **`carrasco-s-a`** | 7.5 | `s` |
+| armizonsky | **`armizon-s-ky`** | 7.5 | `s` |
+| wiktionary | **`wiktion-ar-y`** | 7.5 | `ar` |
+| sundsvall | **`sundsv-al-l`** | 7.5 | `al` |
+| eventually | **`eventu-al-ly`** | 7.5 | `al` |
+| montesson | **`montes-s-on`** | 7.5 | `s` |
+| lifeboats | **`lifebo-a-ts`** | 7.5 | `a` |
+| kindersley | **`kinders-le-y`** | 7.5 | `le` |
+
+### 6.6 Linguistic Interpretation
+
+> **Automated Insight:**
+The language Scots shows high morphological productivity. The subword models are significantly more efficient than word models, suggesting a rich system of affixation or compounding.
+
+---
+## 7. Summary & Recommendations
+
+![Performance Dashboard](visualizations/performance_dashboard.png)
+
+### Production Recommendations
+
+| Component | Recommended | Rationale |
+|-----------|-------------|-----------|
+| Tokenizer | **64k BPE** | Best compression (4.41x) |
+| N-gram | **2-gram** | Lowest perplexity (271) |
+| Markov | **Context-4** | Highest predictability (95.1%) |
+| Embeddings | **100d** | Balanced semantic capture and isotropy |
+
+
+---
+## Appendix: Metrics Glossary & Interpretation Guide
+
+This section provides definitions, intuitions, and guidance for interpreting the metrics used throughout this report.
+
+### Tokenizer Metrics
+
+**Compression Ratio**
+> *Definition:* The ratio of characters to tokens (chars/token). Measures how efficiently the tokenizer represents text.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Higher compression means fewer tokens needed to represent the same text, reducing sequence lengths for downstream models. A 3x compression means ~3 characters per token on average.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Higher is generally better for efficiency, but extremely high compression may indicate overly aggressive merging that loses morphological information.
+
+**Average Token Length (Fertility)**
+> *Definition:* Mean number of characters per token produced by the tokenizer.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Reflects the granularity of tokenization. Longer tokens capture more context but may struggle with rare words; shorter tokens are more flexible but increase sequence length.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Balance between 2-5 characters for most languages. Arabic/morphologically-rich languages may benefit from slightly longer tokens.
+
+**Unknown Token Rate (OOV Rate)**
+> *Definition:* Percentage of tokens that map to the unknown/UNK token, indicating words the tokenizer cannot represent.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Lower OOV means better vocabulary coverage. High OOV indicates the tokenizer encounters many unseen character sequences.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Below 1% is excellent; below 5% is acceptable. BPE tokenizers typically achieve very low OOV due to subword fallback.
+
+### N-gram Model Metrics
+
+**Perplexity**
+> *Definition:* Measures how "surprised" the model is by test data. Mathematically: 2^(cross-entropy). Lower values indicate better prediction.
+>
+> *Intuition:* If perplexity is 100, the model is as uncertain as if choosing uniformly among 100 options at each step. A perplexity of 10 means effectively choosing among 10 equally likely options.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Lower is better. Perplexity decreases with larger n-grams (more context). Values vary widely by language and corpus size.
+
+**Entropy**
+> *Definition:* Average information content (in bits) needed to encode the next token given the context. Related to perplexity: perplexity = 2^entropy.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High entropy means high uncertainty/randomness; low entropy means predictable patterns. Natural language typically has entropy between 1-4 bits per character.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Lower entropy indicates more predictable text patterns. Entropy should decrease as n-gram size increases.
+
+**Coverage (Top-K)**
+> *Definition:* Percentage of corpus occurrences explained by the top K most frequent n-grams.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High coverage with few patterns indicates repetitive/formulaic text; low coverage suggests diverse vocabulary usage.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Depends on use case. For language modeling, moderate coverage (40-60% with top-1000) is typical for natural text.
+
+### Markov Chain Metrics
+
+**Average Entropy**
+> *Definition:* Mean entropy across all contexts, measuring average uncertainty in next-word prediction.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Lower entropy means the model is more confident about what comes next. Context-1 has high entropy (many possible next words); Context-4 has low entropy (few likely continuations).
+>
+> *What to seek:* Decreasing entropy with larger context sizes. Very low entropy (<0.1) indicates highly deterministic transitions.
+
+**Branching Factor**
+> *Definition:* Average number of unique next tokens observed for each context.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High branching = many possible continuations (flexible but uncertain); low branching = few options (predictable but potentially repetitive).
+>
+> *What to seek:* Branching factor should decrease with context size. Values near 1.0 indicate nearly deterministic chains.
+
+**Predictability**
+> *Definition:* Derived metric: (1 - normalized_entropy) × 100%. Indicates how deterministic the model's predictions are.
+>
+> *Intuition:* 100% predictability means the next word is always certain; 0% means completely random. Real text falls between these extremes.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Higher predictability for text generation quality, but too high (>98%) may produce repetitive output.
+
+### Vocabulary & Zipf's Law Metrics
+
+**Zipf's Coefficient**
+> *Definition:* The slope of the log-log plot of word frequency vs. rank. Zipf's law predicts this should be approximately -1.
+>
+> *Intuition:* A coefficient near -1 indicates the corpus follows natural language patterns where a few words are very common and most words are rare.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Values between -0.8 and -1.2 indicate healthy natural language distribution. Deviations may suggest domain-specific or artificial text.
+
+**R² (Coefficient of Determination)**
+> *Definition:* Measures how well the linear fit explains the frequency-rank relationship. Ranges from 0 to 1.
+>
+> *Intuition:* R² near 1.0 means the data closely follows Zipf's law; lower values indicate deviation from expected word frequency patterns.
+>
+> *What to seek:* R² > 0.95 is excellent; > 0.99 indicates near-perfect Zipf adherence typical of large natural corpora.
+
+**Vocabulary Coverage**
+> *Definition:* Cumulative percentage of corpus tokens accounted for by the top N words.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Shows how concentrated word usage is. If top-100 words cover 50% of text, the corpus relies heavily on common words.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Top-100 covering 30-50% is typical. Higher coverage indicates more repetitive text; lower suggests richer vocabulary.
+
+### Word Embedding Metrics
+
+**Isotropy**
+> *Definition:* Measures how uniformly distributed vectors are in the embedding space. Computed as the ratio of minimum to maximum singular values.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High isotropy (near 1.0) means vectors spread evenly in all directions; low isotropy means vectors cluster in certain directions, reducing expressiveness.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Higher isotropy generally indicates better-quality embeddings. Values > 0.1 are reasonable; > 0.3 is good. Lower-dimensional embeddings tend to have higher isotropy.
+
+**Average Norm**
+> *Definition:* Mean magnitude (L2 norm) of word vectors in the embedding space.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Indicates the typical "length" of vectors. Consistent norms suggest stable training; high variance may indicate some words are undertrained.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Relatively consistent norms across models. The absolute value matters less than consistency (low std deviation).
+
+**Cosine Similarity**
+> *Definition:* Measures angular similarity between vectors, ranging from -1 (opposite) to 1 (identical direction).
+>
+> *Intuition:* Words with similar meanings should have high cosine similarity. This is the standard metric for semantic relatedness in embeddings.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Semantically related words should score > 0.5; unrelated words should be near 0. Synonyms often score > 0.7.
+
+**t-SNE Visualization**
+> *Definition:* t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding - a dimensionality reduction technique that preserves local structure for visualization.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Clusters in t-SNE plots indicate groups of semantically related words. Spread indicates vocabulary diversity; tight clusters suggest semantic coherence.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Meaningful clusters (e.g., numbers together, verbs together). Avoid over-interpreting distances - t-SNE preserves local, not global, structure.
+
+### General Interpretation Guidelines
+
+1. **Compare within model families:** Metrics are most meaningful when comparing models of the same type (e.g., 8k vs 64k tokenizer).
+2. **Consider trade-offs:** Better performance on one metric often comes at the cost of another (e.g., compression vs. OOV rate).
+3. **Context matters:** Optimal values depend on downstream tasks. Text generation may prioritize different metrics than classification.
+4. **Corpus influence:** All metrics are influenced by corpus characteristics. Wikipedia text differs from social media or literature.
+5. **Language-specific patterns:** Morphologically rich languages (like Arabic) may show different optimal ranges than analytic languages.
+
+
+### Visualizations Index
+
+| Visualization | Description |
+|---------------|-------------|
+| Tokenizer Compression | Compression ratios by vocabulary size |
+| Tokenizer Fertility | Average token length by vocabulary |
+| Tokenizer OOV | Unknown token rates |
+| Tokenizer Total Tokens | Total tokens by vocabulary |
+| N-gram Perplexity | Perplexity by n-gram size |
+| N-gram Entropy | Entropy by n-gram size |
+| N-gram Coverage | Top pattern coverage |
+| N-gram Unique | Unique n-gram counts |
+| Markov Entropy | Entropy by context size |
+| Markov Branching | Branching factor by context |
+| Markov Contexts | Unique context counts |
+| Zipf's Law | Frequency-rank distribution with fit |
+| Vocab Frequency | Word frequency distribution |
+| Top 20 Words | Most frequent words |
+| Vocab Coverage | Cumulative coverage curve |
+| Embedding Isotropy | Vector space uniformity |
+| Embedding Norms | Vector magnitude distribution |
+| Embedding Similarity | Word similarity heatmap |
+| Nearest Neighbors | Similar words for key terms |
+| t-SNE Words | 2D word embedding visualization |
+| t-SNE Sentences | 2D sentence embedding visualization |
+| Position Encoding | Encoding method comparison |
+| Model Sizes | Storage requirements |
+| Performance Dashboard | Comprehensive performance overview |
+
+---
+## About This Project
+
+### Data Source
+
+Models trained on [wikipedia-monthly](https://huggingface.co/datasets/omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly) - a monthly snapshot of Wikipedia articles across 300+ languages.
+
+### Project
+
+A project by **[Wikilangs](https://wikilangs.org)** - Open-source NLP models for every Wikipedia language.
+
+### Maintainer
+
+[Omar Kamali](https://omarkamali.com) - [Omneity Labs](https://omneitylabs.com)
+
+### Citation
+
+If you use these models in your research, please cite:
+
+```bibtex
+@misc{wikilangs2025,
+  author = {Kamali, Omar},
+  title = {Wikilangs: Open NLP Models for Wikipedia Languages},
+  year = {2025},
+  doi = {10.5281/zenodo.18073153},
+  publisher = {Zenodo},
+  url = {https://huggingface.co/wikilangs}
+  institution = {Omneity Labs}
+}
+```
+
+### License
+
+MIT License - Free for academic and commercial use.
+
+### Links
+
+- 🌐 Website: [wikilangs.org](https://wikilangs.org)
+- 🤗 Models: [huggingface.co/wikilangs](https://huggingface.co/wikilangs)
+- 📊 Data: [wikipedia-monthly](https://huggingface.co/datasets/omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly)
+- 👤 Author: [Omar Kamali](https://huggingface.co/omarkamali)
+- 🤝 Sponsor: [Featherless AI](https://featherless.ai)
+---
+*Generated by Wikilangs Models Pipeline*
+
+*Report Date: 2026-01-10 20:17:20*

models/embeddings/aligned/sco_128d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:3b43526fb6f0cfcc286f711537ad54f4dec8e145b5cda04ebc76f901e9807254
+size 1101146315

models/embeddings/aligned/sco_128d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "sco", "dim": 128, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": true}

models/embeddings/aligned/sco_128d.projection.npy

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:bfbdedbb04f4480b807ea66a6bf45a3598d2d23603aa4225740f9fe04cdc9a4a
+size 65664

models/embeddings/aligned/sco_128d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+{
+  "language": "sco",
+  "dimension": 128,
+  "version": "aligned",
+  "hub_language": "en",
+  "seed_vocab_size": 55690,
+  "vocab_size": 74094
+}

models/embeddings/aligned/sco_32d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:4a98fb0b971b0119526ffd437a7c9f21c56ef532e8be9fcf7b8731f6cc9a231e
+size 276242123

models/embeddings/aligned/sco_32d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "sco", "dim": 32, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": true}

models/embeddings/aligned/sco_32d.projection.npy

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:28915b43aa77bcbeb06da466af0e6156fa060235acca66c466065bd9a212d58a
+size 4224

models/embeddings/aligned/sco_32d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+{
+  "language": "sco",
+  "dimension": 32,
+  "version": "aligned",
+  "hub_language": "en",
+  "seed_vocab_size": 55690,
+  "vocab_size": 74094
+}

models/embeddings/aligned/sco_64d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:0651400a4b30e8413b16d1cbfc59a10990bcf60af60547951cd26bd5aa351e48
+size 551210187

models/embeddings/aligned/sco_64d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "sco", "dim": 64, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": true}

models/embeddings/aligned/sco_64d.projection.npy

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:7374a0ea7be5d757f1b35a947f04c9e2979878d647ac3f70fa1e15225fcbb927
+size 16512

models/embeddings/aligned/sco_64d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+{
+  "language": "sco",
+  "dimension": 64,
+  "version": "aligned",
+  "hub_language": "en",
+  "seed_vocab_size": 55690,
+  "vocab_size": 74094
+}

models/embeddings/monolingual/sco_128d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:3b43526fb6f0cfcc286f711537ad54f4dec8e145b5cda04ebc76f901e9807254
+size 1101146315

models/embeddings/monolingual/sco_128d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "sco", "dim": 128, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": false}

models/embeddings/monolingual/sco_128d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+{
+  "language": "sco",
+  "dimension": 128,
+  "version": "monolingual",
+  "training_params": {
+    "algorithm": "skipgram",
+    "min_count": 5,
+    "window": 5,
+    "negative": 5,
+    "epochs": 5,
+    "encoding_method": "rope",
+    "dim": 128,
+    "threads": 5
+  },
+  "vocab_size": 74094
+}

models/embeddings/monolingual/sco_32d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:4a98fb0b971b0119526ffd437a7c9f21c56ef532e8be9fcf7b8731f6cc9a231e
+size 276242123

models/embeddings/monolingual/sco_32d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "sco", "dim": 32, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": false}

models/embeddings/monolingual/sco_32d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+{
+  "language": "sco",
+  "dimension": 32,
+  "version": "monolingual",
+  "training_params": {
+    "algorithm": "skipgram",
+    "min_count": 5,
+    "window": 5,
+    "negative": 5,
+    "epochs": 5,
+    "encoding_method": "rope",
+    "dim": 32,
+    "threads": 5
+  },
+  "vocab_size": 74094
+}

models/embeddings/monolingual/sco_64d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:0651400a4b30e8413b16d1cbfc59a10990bcf60af60547951cd26bd5aa351e48
+size 551210187

models/embeddings/monolingual/sco_64d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "sco", "dim": 64, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": false}

models/embeddings/monolingual/sco_64d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+{
+  "language": "sco",
+  "dimension": 64,
+  "version": "monolingual",
+  "training_params": {
+    "algorithm": "skipgram",
+    "min_count": 5,
+    "window": 5,
+    "negative": 5,
+    "epochs": 5,
+    "encoding_method": "rope",
+    "dim": 64,
+    "threads": 5
+  },
+  "vocab_size": 74094
+}

models/subword_markov/sco_markov_ctx1_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:2077ef2786fc1777f023b2bcb2297efa81dc04e16b48577eb047c2c9bce02cd5
+size 212311

models/subword_markov/sco_markov_ctx1_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 1,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "sco",
+  "unique_contexts": 4231,
+  "total_transitions": 38680306
+}

models/subword_markov/sco_markov_ctx2_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:5bc4001a1b652fa82ea497159caaf00a1106c0b21bbd9a1b0c3321163ea642f8
+size 1019757

models/subword_markov/sco_markov_ctx2_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 2,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "sco",
+  "unique_contexts": 27028,
+  "total_transitions": 38646017
+}

models/subword_markov/sco_markov_ctx3_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:5785f8a08fc8f767494b75dd6d1dd3e14947ad7131b4e430b2f2710cb3e9be8c
+size 3861836

models/subword_markov/sco_markov_ctx3_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 3,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "sco",
+  "unique_contexts": 120570,
+  "total_transitions": 38611728
+}

models/subword_markov/sco_markov_ctx4_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:38ed59b1ae592c50eb7595fbee76d5412877b56a2188726e80552630464bb46f
+size 11878727

models/subword_markov/sco_markov_ctx4_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 4,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "sco",
+  "unique_contexts": 479292,
+  "total_transitions": 38577439
+}

models/subword_ngram/sco_2gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:720f816657c843c06354e71a5d31abd35a9f278f15f940dbaa80c240ae76cead
+size 98454

models/subword_ngram/sco_2gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 2,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "sco",
+  "unique_ngrams": 7416,
+  "total_ngrams": 38680306
+}

models/subword_ngram/sco_3gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:724757ca9df22e3800832c48778e5659b2308dee2daa3be9e8460bc868ef1afd
+size 669680

models/subword_ngram/sco_3gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 3,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "sco",
+  "unique_ngrams": 51687,
+  "total_ngrams": 38646017
+}

models/subword_ngram/sco_4gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:b7057922f05453833e5de1e1b6df9a158e956a4b8e0c7fa143e2a83791c76156
+size 3120988

models/subword_ngram/sco_4gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 4,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "sco",
+  "unique_ngrams": 273093,
+  "total_ngrams": 38611728
+}

models/subword_ngram/sco_5gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:321172933f27e96528d457027b909eb56273ddcc53c63b3fdcfe020997c630b2
+size 9140994

models/subword_ngram/sco_5gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 5,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "sco",
+  "unique_ngrams": 795931,
+  "total_ngrams": 38577439
+}

models/tokenizer/sco_tokenizer_16k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:bfc4d7788fd5cf66e54f90cd3712b11cd65a959736d494098c5f7a69589b376e
+size 507318

models/tokenizer/sco_tokenizer_32k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:25f7316e2815c53423e87ed62e49197e5e7f229062ed08395019314648275279
+size 781124

models/tokenizer/sco_tokenizer_64k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:2ca0aa3d2ffe4b69e9ae9228100edb920d4c53c59e84d5cd371840f875213080
+size 1339859

models/tokenizer/sco_tokenizer_8k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:8c8f70ffc39edc358cbdd1dd3b54d61ba20048da94608cd83c7a9d50566ec960
+size 372577

models/vocabulary/sco_vocabulary.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:db8a6951dae652943be71e8e059141dec1500a888011040f5fe54f5cb0b5a867
+size 2125195

models/vocabulary/sco_vocabulary_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+{
+  "language": "sco",
+  "vocabulary_size": 123249,
+  "variant": "full",
+  "statistics": {
+    "type_token_ratio": 0.04317203946868301,
+    "coverage": {
+      "top_100": 0.3860362683140669,
+      "top_1000": 0.6159538265060486,
+      "top_5000": 0.7832486468748892,
+      "top_10000": 0.8444192774717338
+    },
+    "hapax_count": 149351,
+    "hapax_ratio": 0.5478760088041086,
+    "total_documents": 34289
+  }
+}

models/word_markov/sco_markov_ctx1_word.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:024b87a1295ced10733fdbefccf0cb01e7d08b1701dcfa4a1238b4af57b55cae
+size 18365502