Upload all models and assets for tg (latest)

.gitattributes

@@ -33,3 +33,10 @@ saved_model/**/* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *.zip filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *.zst filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *tfevents* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/embedding_similarity.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/embedding_tsne_multilingual.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/performance_dashboard.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/position_encoding_comparison.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/tsne_sentences.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/tsne_words.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/zipf_law.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text

README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,775 @@
+---
+language: tg
+language_name: Tajik
+language_family: iranian_western
+tags:
+  - wikilangs
+  - nlp
+  - tokenizer
+  - embeddings
+  - n-gram
+  - markov
+  - wikipedia
+  - feature-extraction
+  - sentence-similarity
+  - tokenization
+  - n-grams
+  - markov-chain
+  - text-mining
+  - fasttext
+  - babelvec
+  - vocabulous
+  - vocabulary
+  - monolingual
+  - family-iranian_western
+license: mit
+library_name: wikilangs
+pipeline_tag: text-generation
+datasets:
+  - omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly
+dataset_info:
+  name: wikipedia-monthly
+  description: Monthly snapshots of Wikipedia articles across 300+ languages
+metrics:
+  - name: best_compression_ratio
+    type: compression
+    value: 4.487
+  - name: best_isotropy
+    type: isotropy
+    value: 0.7880
+  - name: vocabulary_size
+    type: vocab
+    value: 0
+generated: 2026-01-11
+---
+
+# Tajik - Wikilangs Models
+## Comprehensive Research Report & Full Ablation Study
+
+This repository contains NLP models trained and evaluated by Wikilangs, specifically on **Tajik** Wikipedia data.
+We analyze tokenizers, n-gram models, Markov chains, vocabulary statistics, and word embeddings.
+
+## 📋 Repository Contents
+
+### Models & Assets
+
+- Tokenizers (8k, 16k, 32k, 64k)
+- N-gram models (2, 3, 4, 5-gram)
+- Markov chains (context of 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5)
+- Subword N-gram and Markov chains
+- Embeddings in various sizes and dimensions (aligned and unaligned)
+- Language Vocabulary
+- Language Statistics
+
+![Performance Dashboard](visualizations/performance_dashboard.png)
+
+### Analysis and Evaluation
+
+- [1. Tokenizer Evaluation](#1-tokenizer-evaluation)
+- [2. N-gram Model Evaluation](#2-n-gram-model-evaluation)
+- [3. Markov Chain Evaluation](#3-markov-chain-evaluation)
+- [4. Vocabulary Analysis](#4-vocabulary-analysis)
+- [5. Word Embeddings Evaluation](#5-word-embeddings-evaluation)
+- [6. Morphological Analysis (Experimental)](#6--morphological-analysis-experimental)
+- [7. Summary & Recommendations](#7-summary--recommendations)
+- [Metrics Glossary](#appendix-metrics-glossary--interpretation-guide)
+- [Visualizations Index](#visualizations-index)
+
+---
+## 1. Tokenizer Evaluation
+
+![Tokenizer Compression](visualizations/tokenizer_compression.png)
+
+![Tokenizer Fertility](visualizations/tokenizer_fertility.png)
+
+![Tokenizer OOV](visualizations/tokenizer_oov.png)
+
+![Total Tokens](visualizations/tokenizer_total_tokens.png)
+
+### Results
+
+| Vocab Size | Compression | Avg Token Len | UNK Rate | Total Tokens |
+|------------|-------------|---------------|----------|--------------|
+| **8k** | 3.486x | 3.49 | 0.2019% | 742,474 |
+| **16k** | 3.884x | 3.89 | 0.2250% | 666,367 |
+| **32k** | 4.228x | 4.23 | 0.2449% | 612,153 |
+| **64k** | 4.487x 🏆 | 4.49 | 0.2599% | 576,760 |
+
+### Tokenization Examples
+
+Below are sample sentences tokenized with each vocabulary size:
+
+**Sample 1:** `Рӯйдодҳо Зодрӯзҳо Даргузаштҳо Хэ-ди — шоҳаншоҳи Чин 89 — 105. Эзоҳ 105`
+
+| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
+|-------|--------|-------|
+| 8k | `▁рӯйдодҳо ▁зодрӯзҳо ▁даргузаштҳо ▁х э - ди ▁— ▁шоҳ ан ... (+16 more)` | 26 |
+| 16k | `▁рӯйдодҳо ▁зодрӯзҳо ▁даргузаштҳо ▁х э - ди ▁— ▁шоҳан шоҳи ... (+15 more)` | 25 |
+| 32k | `▁рӯйдодҳо ▁зодрӯзҳо ▁даргузаштҳо ▁х э - ди ▁— ▁шоҳаншоҳи ▁чин ... (+14 more)` | 24 |
+| 64k | `▁рӯйдодҳо ▁зодрӯзҳо ▁даргузаштҳо ▁хэ - ди ▁— ▁шоҳаншоҳи ▁чин ▁ ... (+13 more)` | 23 |
+
+**Sample 2:** `Рӯйдодҳо Зодрӯзҳо Бознигаред: : соли Даргузаштҳо Бознигаред: : соли Нигаред низ ...`
+
+| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
+|-------|--------|-------|
+| 8k | `▁рӯйдодҳо ▁зодрӯзҳо ▁бознигаред : ▁: ▁соли ▁даргузаштҳо ▁бознигаред : ▁: ... (+4 more)` | 14 |
+| 16k | `▁рӯйдодҳо ▁зодрӯзҳо ▁бознигаред : ▁: ▁соли ▁даргузаштҳо ▁бознигаред : ▁: ... (+4 more)` | 14 |
+| 32k | `▁рӯйдодҳо ▁зодрӯзҳо ▁бознигаред : ▁: ▁соли ▁даргузаштҳо ▁бознигаред : ▁: ... (+4 more)` | 14 |
+| 64k | `▁рӯйдодҳо ▁зодрӯзҳо ▁бознигаред : ▁: ▁соли ▁даргузаштҳо ▁бознигаред : ▁: ... (+4 more)` | 14 |
+
+**Sample 3:** `AMD Alarus () — як ҳавогарди сохтаи Aircraft Manufacturing and Development аст ....`
+
+| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
+|-------|--------|-------|
+| 8k | `▁am d ▁al ar us ▁() ▁— ▁як ▁ҳавогарди ▁сохтаи ... (+22 more)` | 32 |
+| 16k | `▁am d ▁al ar us ▁() ▁— ▁як ▁ҳавогарди ▁сохтаи ... (+19 more)` | 29 |
+| 32k | `▁am d ▁al ar us ▁() ▁— ▁як ▁ҳавогарди ▁сохтаи ... (+12 more)` | 22 |
+| 64k | `▁am d ▁alar us ▁() ▁— ▁як ▁ҳавогарди ▁сохтаи ▁aircraft ... (+11 more)` | 21 |
+
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Compression:** 64k achieves 4.487x compression
+- **Lowest UNK Rate:** 8k with 0.2019% unknown tokens
+- **Trade-off:** Larger vocabularies improve compression but increase model size
+- **Recommendation:** 32k vocabulary provides optimal balance for production use
+
+---
+## 2. N-gram Model Evaluation
+
+![N-gram Perplexity](visualizations/ngram_perplexity.png)
+
+![N-gram Unique](visualizations/ngram_unique.png)
+
+![N-gram Coverage](visualizations/ngram_coverage.png)
+
+### Results
+
+| N-gram | Variant | Perplexity | Entropy | Unique N-grams | Top-100 Coverage | Top-1000 Coverage |
+|--------|---------|------------|---------|----------------|------------------|-------------------|
+| **2-gram** | Word | 19,024 | 14.22 | 199,195 | 23.5% | 41.6% |
+| **2-gram** | Subword | 400 🏆 | 8.65 | 9,876 | 59.8% | 96.9% |
+| **3-gram** | Word | 19,608 | 14.26 | 288,805 | 27.4% | 43.9% |
+| **3-gram** | Subword | 3,354 | 11.71 | 85,351 | 23.8% | 64.5% |
+| **4-gram** | Word | 23,769 | 14.54 | 463,359 | 28.2% | 44.2% |
+| **4-gram** | Subword | 16,216 | 13.99 | 471,031 | 12.0% | 39.6% |
+| **5-gram** | Word | 16,389 | 14.00 | 359,581 | 30.9% | 47.7% |
+| **5-gram** | Subword | 49,233 | 15.59 | 1,276,489 | 8.3% | 29.1% |
+
+### Top 5 N-grams by Size
+
+**2-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `аз рӯи` | 48,520 |
+| 2 | `ки дар` | 46,991 |
+| 3 | `рӯи алифбо` | 45,099 |
+| 4 | `қарор дорад` | 37,326 |
+| 5 | `яке аз` | 36,325 |
+
+**3-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `аз рӯи алифбо` | 45,098 |
+| 2 | `аҳолинишин аз рӯи` | 28,845 |
+| 3 | `дар ҳайати ноҳияи` | 27,938 |
+| 4 | `системаи хабарнигории давлатӣ` | 25,776 |
+| 5 | `рӯи алифбо аҳолинишини` | 25,024 |
+
+**4-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `аҳолинишин аз рӯи алифбо` | 28,844 |
+| 2 | `аз рӯи алифбо аҳолинишини` | 25,024 |
+| 3 | `рӯи алифбо аҳолинишини ноҳияи` | 25,018 |
+| 4 | `geonames org аҳолинишин аз` | 24,991 |
+| 5 | `org аҳолинишин аз рӯи` | 24,991 |
+
+**5-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `аҳолинишин аз рӯи алифбо аҳолинишини` | 25,023 |
+| 2 | `аз рӯи алифбо аҳолинишини ноҳияи` | 25,018 |
+| 3 | `geonames org аҳолинишин аз рӯи` | 24,991 |
+| 4 | `org аҳолинишин аз рӯи алифбо` | 24,991 |
+| 5 | `маҳаллаҳои аҳолинишини федератсияи русия мебошад` | 24,020 |
+
+**2-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `и _` | 3,036,155 |
+| 2 | `а р` | 1,436,276 |
+| 3 | `д а` | 1,047,669 |
+| 4 | `_ м` | 932,624 |
+| 5 | `_ д` | 931,412 |
+
+**3-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `_ д а` | 509,185 |
+| 2 | `а р _` | 476,961 |
+| 3 | `д а р` | 438,520 |
+| 4 | `_ б а` | 373,477 |
+| 5 | `о и _` | 371,838 |
+
+**4-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `_ д а р` | 403,605 |
+| 2 | `д а р _` | 377,815 |
+| 3 | `ҳ о и _` | 286,612 |
+| 4 | `_ в а _` | 254,093 |
+| 5 | `_ а з _` | 231,233 |
+
+**5-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `_ д а р _` | 368,835 |
+| 2 | `, _ к и _` | 119,898 |
+| 3 | `с о л и _` | 105,997 |
+| 4 | `_ с о л и` | 103,103 |
+| 5 | `_ а ҳ о л` | 100,780 |
+
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Perplexity:** 2-gram (subword) with 400
+- **Entropy Trend:** Decreases with larger n-grams (more predictable)
+- **Coverage:** Top-1000 patterns cover ~29% of corpus
+- **Recommendation:** 4-gram or 5-gram for best predictive performance
+
+---
+## 3. Markov Chain Evaluation
+
+![Markov Entropy](visualizations/markov_entropy.png)
+
+![Markov Contexts](visualizations/markov_contexts.png)
+
+![Markov Branching](visualizations/markov_branching.png)
+
+### Results
+
+| Context | Variant | Avg Entropy | Perplexity | Branching Factor | Unique Contexts | Predictability |
+|---------|---------|-------------|------------|------------------|-----------------|----------------|
+| **1** | Word | 0.8187 | 1.764 | 7.04 | 506,708 | 18.1% |
+| **1** | Subword | 0.9461 | 1.927 | 8.08 | 3,218 | 5.4% |
+| **2** | Word | 0.2712 | 1.207 | 1.75 | 3,558,039 | 72.9% |
+| **2** | Subword | 0.9170 | 1.888 | 6.45 | 25,977 | 8.3% |
+| **3** | Word | 0.0958 | 1.069 | 1.19 | 6,212,459 | 90.4% |
+| **3** | Subword | 0.8398 | 1.790 | 4.71 | 167,557 | 16.0% |
+| **4** | Word | 0.0373 🏆 | 1.026 | 1.07 | 7,351,856 | 96.3% |
+| **4** | Subword | 0.6814 | 1.604 | 3.16 | 788,521 | 31.9% |
+
+### Generated Text Samples (Word-based)
+
+Below are text samples generated from each word-based Markov chain model:
+
+**Context Size 1:**
+
+1. `дар ҳайати ноҳияи верховаж ки чопи офсети стр 367 6 донишҷӯёни барномаи ms 25px чоряки якуми`
+2. `ва субъективизм ва адлия бароварда шуданд принсипҳое ки як фаввораи ишқ чашми ҷон муҳар рӯзн байрақи`
+3. `аз қабили маҳмуд ибни абияъқуб исҳоқ то 900 шарҳи ин фурудгоҳ дар асоси телевизиони пойтахт он`
+
+**Context Size 2:**
+
+1. `аз рӯи алифбо аҳолинишини ноҳияи череповетс вологда`
+2. `ки дар таъсис ёфта ‌‌аст қутби ukraine air alliance як ширкати ҳавопаймоӣ дар асмэра эритрея ҷойгир ...`
+3. `қарор дорад ва дар санъати атиқаи осиёи марказӣ гунае аз амалиёти муваффақ дар белиз ба ҳисоб мерава...`
+
+**Context Size 3:**
+
+1. `аз рӯи алифбо аҳолинишини ноҳияи шенкур`
+2. `аҳолинишин аз рӯи алифбо аҳолинишини ноҳияи сураж`
+3. `дар ҳайати ноҳияи лиски ки дар вилояти владимир қарор дорад дохил мешавад системаи хабарнигории давл...`
+
+**Context Size 4:**
+
+1. `аҳолинишин аз рӯи алифбо аҳолинишини ноҳияи красноборский красноборский`
+2. `аз рӯи алифбо аҳолинишини ноҳияи кичменгско городетс вологда`
+3. `рӯи алифбо аҳолинишини ноҳияи киржач`
+
+
+### Generated Text Samples (Subword-based)
+
+Below are text samples generated from each subword-based Markov chain model:
+
+**Context Size 1:**
+
+1. `_д.os-июлуя_мтро`
+2. `аи_(),_дан_шу_(;`
+3. `и_آغاند_ои_оҳата`
+
+**Context Size 2:**
+
+1. `и_имроҳӣ_ваниҳоли`
+2. `ар_дар_ҷашҳутбол_`
+3. `даи_милогамон_ҳад`
+
+**Context Size 3:**
+
+1. `_дар_деҳа,_киности`
+2. `ар_трид_сисаҳолегр`
+3. `дар_вилобчаҳолини_`
+
+**Context Size 4:**
+
+1. `_дар_аввалинобар_ба`
+2. `дар_синниколай_ауди`
+3. `ҳои_рангҳои_арти_си`
+
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Predictability:** Context-4 (word) with 96.3% predictability
+- **Branching Factor:** Decreases with context size (more deterministic)
+- **Memory Trade-off:** Larger contexts require more storage (788,521 contexts)
+- **Recommendation:** Context-3 or Context-4 for text generation
+
+---
+## 4. Vocabulary Analysis
+
+![Zipf's Law](visualizations/zipf_law.png)
+
+![Top Words](visualizations/top20_words.png)
+
+![Coverage Curve](visualizations/vocab_coverage.png)
+
+### Statistics
+
+| Metric | Value |
+|--------|-------|
+| Vocabulary Size | 215,596 |
+| Total Tokens | 10,911,035 |
+| Mean Frequency | 50.61 |
+| Median Frequency | 4 |
+| Frequency Std Dev | 1428.75 |
+
+### Most Common Words
+
+| Rank | Word | Frequency |
+|------|------|-----------|
+| 1 | дар | 374,510 |
+| 2 | ва | 255,196 |
+| 3 | аз | 236,317 |
+| 4 | ба | 177,909 |
+| 5 | ки | 129,043 |
+| 6 | бф | 122,591 |
+| 7 | соли | 103,632 |
+| 8 | эзоҳ | 83,015 |
+| 9 | ноҳияи | 82,572 |
+| 10 | аст | 73,194 |
+
+### Least Common Words (from vocabulary)
+
+| Rank | Word | Frequency |
+|------|------|-----------|
+| 1 | шамсиро | 2 |
+| 2 | депрессияҳо | 2 |
+| 3 | муқронес | 2 |
+| 4 | корнис | 2 |
+| 5 | карнизхо | 2 |
+| 6 | cornice | 2 |
+| 7 | муқарнасҳо | 2 |
+| 8 | марафсай | 2 |
+| 9 | лабсурхкунакҳои | 2 |
+| 10 | estée | 2 |
+
+### Zipf's Law Analysis
+
+| Metric | Value |
+|--------|-------|
+| Zipf Coefficient | 1.0636 |
+| R² (Goodness of Fit) | 0.996995 |
+| Adherence Quality | **excellent** |
+
+### Coverage Analysis
+
+| Top N Words | Coverage |
+|-------------|----------|
+| Top 100 | 35.8% |
+| Top 1,000 | 60.7% |
+| Top 5,000 | 77.3% |
+| Top 10,000 | 83.6% |
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Zipf Compliance:** R²=0.9970 indicates excellent adherence to Zipf's law
+- **High Frequency Dominance:** Top 100 words cover 35.8% of corpus
+- **Long Tail:** 205,596 words needed for remaining 16.4% coverage
+
+---
+## 5. Word Embeddings Evaluation
+
+![Embedding Isotropy](visualizations/embedding_isotropy.png)
+
+![Similarity Matrix](visualizations/embedding_similarity.png)
+
+![t-SNE Words](visualizations/tsne_words.png)
+
+![t-SNE Sentences](visualizations/tsne_sentences.png)
+
+
+### 5.1 Cross-Lingual Alignment
+
+![Alignment Quality](visualizations/embedding_alignment_quality.png)
+
+![Multilingual t-SNE](visualizations/embedding_tsne_multilingual.png)
+
+
+### 5.2 Model Comparison
+
+| Model | Dimension | Isotropy | Semantic Density | Alignment R@1 | Alignment R@10 |
+|-------|-----------|----------|------------------|---------------|----------------|
+| **mono_32d** | 32 | 0.7880 | 0.3621 | N/A | N/A |
+| **mono_64d** | 64 | 0.7858 | 0.2745 | N/A | N/A |
+| **mono_128d** | 128 | 0.7609 | 0.2180 | N/A | N/A |
+| **aligned_32d** | 32 | 0.7880 🏆 | 0.3519 | 0.0200 | 0.1960 |
+| **aligned_64d** | 64 | 0.7858 | 0.2700 | 0.0400 | 0.2740 |
+| **aligned_128d** | 128 | 0.7609 | 0.2081 | 0.1020 | 0.3880 |
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Isotropy:** aligned_32d with 0.7880 (more uniform distribution)
+- **Semantic Density:** Average pairwise similarity of 0.2808. Lower values indicate better semantic separation.
+- **Alignment Quality:** Aligned models achieve up to 10.2% R@1 in cross-lingual retrieval.
+- **Recommendation:** 128d aligned for best cross-lingual performance
+
+---
+## 6.  Morphological Analysis (Experimental)
+
+This section presents an automated morphological analysis derived from the statistical divergence between word-level and subword-level models. By analyzing where subword predictability spikes and where word-level coverage fails, we can infer linguistic structures without supervised data.
+
+### 6.1 Productivity & Complexity
+
+| Metric | Value | Interpretation | Recommendation |
+|--------|-------|----------------|----------------|
+| Productivity Index | **5.000** | High morphological productivity | Reliable analysis |
+| Idiomaticity Gap | **0.637** | High formulaic/idiomatic content | - |
+
+### 6.2 Affix Inventory (Productive Units)
+
+These are the most productive prefixes and suffixes identified by sampling the vocabulary for global substitutability patterns. A unit is considered an affix if stripping it leaves a valid stem that appears in other contexts.
+
+#### Productive Prefixes
+| Prefix | Examples |
+|--------|----------|
+| `-а` | асарҳост, астрасторгуева, аскасибар |
+| `-ма` | манзумаҳое, малҳама, мальбум |
+| `-с` | сурьмы, саркашро, собирҷонов |
+| `-м` | металлургии, мураббаъро, муҷибурраҳмон |
+| `-б` | биосинтези, било, буридааст |
+| `-к` | кабудчашма, комендантӣ, капустино |
+| `-са` | саркашро, санъаткорон, сапонини |
+| `-та` | ташаузский, таьлими, таҳримҳои |
+
+#### Productive Suffixes
+| Suffix | Examples |
+|--------|----------|
+| `-и` | ченкунандаи, ҷудонашавандаи, металлургии |
+| `-о` | лано, мураббаъро, саркашро |
+| `-ро` | мураббаъро, саркашро, императориро |
+| `-а` | кабудчашма, астрасторгуева, гулзода |
+| `-н` | парвизҷон, муҷибурраҳмон, санъаткорон |
+| `-ӣ` | зандагӣ, комендантӣ, аннӣ |
+| `-ии` | металлургии, регуляризации, якшавии |
+| `-ои` | равоқтоқҳои, кошиҳои, таҳримҳои |
+
+### 6.3 Bound Stems (Lexical Roots)
+
+Bound stems are high-frequency subword units that are semantically cohesive but rarely appear as standalone words. These often correspond to the 'core' of a word that requires inflection or derivation to be valid.
+
+| Stem | Cohesion | Substitutability | Examples |
+|------|----------|------------------|----------|
+| `шава` | 2.31x | 47 contexts | шавад, шавам, нашава |
+| `влат` | 2.32x | 46 contexts | давлат, савлат, давлатӣ |
+| `оҷик` | 2.37x | 33 contexts | тоҷик, тоҷикӣ, тоҷику |
+| `ҷики` | 2.65x | 18 contexts | ҷикис, тоҷики, тоҷикии |
+| `авла` | 2.12x | 38 contexts | давла, шавла, чавла |
+| `лини` | 1.91x | 55 contexts | линия, линий, плини |
+| `арор` | 1.67x | 80 contexts | карор, тарор, шарор |
+| `тбол` | 2.37x | 20 contexts | футбол, футболӣ, футбола |
+| `уруд` | 1.85x | 48 contexts | куруд, вуруд, дуруд |
+| `оҳия` | 1.88x | 42 contexts | ноҳия, воҳия, ибоҳия |
+| `усия` | 2.26x | 20 contexts | русия, лусия, русияю |
+| `ниши` | 1.66x | 62 contexts | нишин, дониши, хониши |
+
+### 6.4 Affix Compatibility (Co-occurrence)
+
+This table shows which prefixes and suffixes most frequently co-occur on the same stems, revealing the 'stacking' rules of the language's morphology.
+
+| Prefix | Suffix | Frequency | Examples |
+|--------|--------|-----------|----------|
+| `-с` | `-и` | 98 words | сеи, соддаи |
+| `-м` | `-и` | 91 words | маҷаллаи, муаммолари |
+| `-а` | `-и` | 85 words | анаси, авҷгирии |
+| `-к` | `-и` | 81 words | корбарии, кимёии |
+| `-к` | `-о` | 59 words | крепостноиро, ку��ако |
+| `-б` | `-и` | 56 words | бейлики, бакши |
+| `-б` | `-о` | 53 words | бонуфузро, бонҳо |
+| `-а` | `-о` | 51 words | алавиро, агентҳо |
+| `-с` | `-о` | 51 words | сайтҳо, семинарио |
+| `-ма` | `-и` | 49 words | маҷаллаи, марки |
+
+### 6.5 Recursive Morpheme Segmentation
+
+Using **Recursive Hierarchical Substitutability**, we decompose complex words into their constituent morphemes. This approach handles nested affixes (e.g., `prefix-prefix-root-suffix`).
+
+| Word | Suggested Split | Confidence | Stem |
+|------|-----------------|------------|------|
+| қизилкӯпир | **`қизилкӯп-и-р`** | 7.5 | `и` |
+| лентапедиа | **`лентапед-и-а`** | 7.5 | `и` |
+| толкование | **`толкован-и-е`** | 7.5 | `и` |
+| мамлакатдориро | **`мамлакатдор-и-ро`** | 7.5 | `и` |
+| нишонгири | **`нишонг-и-ри`** | 7.5 | `и` |
+| баҳовадин | **`баҳовад-и-н`** | 7.5 | `и` |
+| фақиртарин | **`фақиртар-и-н`** | 7.5 | `и` |
+| католикиро | **`католик-и-ро`** | 7.5 | `и` |
+| бисёрошёнаи | **`бисёрошё-на-и`** | 7.5 | `на` |
+| гармкунак | **`гармку-на-к`** | 7.5 | `на` |
+| максимовшина | **`максимовш-и-на`** | 7.5 | `и` |
+| густурдае | **`густур-да-е`** | 7.5 | `да` |
+| эллипсоид | **`эллипсо-и-д`** | 7.5 | `и` |
+| печидагиҳо | **`печидаг-и-ҳо`** | 7.5 | `и` |
+| компанион | **`компан-и-он`** | 7.5 | `и` |
+
+### 6.6 Linguistic Interpretation
+
+> **Automated Insight:**
+The language Tajik shows high morphological productivity. The subword models are significantly more efficient than word models, suggesting a rich system of affixation or compounding.
+
+> **Note on Idiomaticity:** The high Idiomaticity Gap suggests a large number of frequent multi-word expressions or formulaic sequences that are statistically distinct from their component parts.
+
+---
+## 7. Summary & Recommendations
+
+![Performance Dashboard](visualizations/performance_dashboard.png)
+
+### Production Recommendations
+
+| Component | Recommended | Rationale |
+|-----------|-------------|-----------|
+| Tokenizer | **64k BPE** | Best compression (4.49x) |
+| N-gram | **2-gram** | Lowest perplexity (400) |
+| Markov | **Context-4** | Highest predictability (96.3%) |
+| Embeddings | **100d** | Balanced semantic capture and isotropy |
+
+
+---
+## Appendix: Metrics Glossary & Interpretation Guide
+
+This section provides definitions, intuitions, and guidance for interpreting the metrics used throughout this report.
+
+### Tokenizer Metrics
+
+**Compression Ratio**
+> *Definition:* The ratio of characters to tokens (chars/token). Measures how efficiently the tokenizer represents text.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Higher compression means fewer tokens needed to represent the same text, reducing sequence lengths for downstream models. A 3x compression means ~3 characters per token on average.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Higher is generally better for efficiency, but extremely high compression may indicate overly aggressive merging that loses morphological information.
+
+**Average Token Length (Fertility)**
+> *Definition:* Mean number of characters per token produced by the tokenizer.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Reflects the granularity of tokenization. Longer tokens capture more context but may struggle with rare words; shorter tokens are more flexible but increase sequence length.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Balance between 2-5 characters for most languages. Arabic/morphologically-rich languages may benefit from slightly longer tokens.
+
+**Unknown Token Rate (OOV Rate)**
+> *Definition:* Percentage of tokens that map to the unknown/UNK token, indicating words the tokenizer cannot represent.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Lower OOV means better vocabulary coverage. High OOV indicates the tokenizer encounters many unseen character sequences.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Below 1% is excellent; below 5% is acceptable. BPE tokenizers typically achieve very low OOV due to subword fallback.
+
+### N-gram Model Metrics
+
+**Perplexity**
+> *Definition:* Measures how "surprised" the model is by test data. Mathematically: 2^(cross-entropy). Lower values indicate better prediction.
+>
+> *Intuition:* If perplexity is 100, the model is as uncertain as if choosing uniformly among 100 options at each step. A perplexity of 10 means effectively choosing among 10 equally likely options.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Lower is better. Perplexity decreases with larger n-grams (more context). Values vary widely by language and corpus size.
+
+**Entropy**
+> *Definition:* Average information content (in bits) needed to encode the next token given the context. Related to perplexity: perplexity = 2^entropy.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High entropy means high uncertainty/randomness; low entropy means predictable patterns. Natural language typically has entropy between 1-4 bits per character.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Lower entropy indicates more predictable text patterns. Entropy should decrease as n-gram size increases.
+
+**Coverage (Top-K)**
+> *Definition:* Percentage of corpus occurrences explained by the top K most frequent n-grams.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High coverage with few patterns indicates repetitive/formulaic text; low coverage suggests diverse vocabulary usage.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Depends on use case. For language modeling, moderate coverage (40-60% with top-1000) is typical for natural text.
+
+### Markov Chain Metrics
+
+**Average Entropy**
+> *Definition:* Mean entropy across all contexts, measuring average uncertainty in next-word prediction.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Lower entropy means the model is more confident about what comes next. Context-1 has high entropy (many possible next words); Context-4 has low entropy (few likely continuations).
+>
+> *What to seek:* Decreasing entropy with larger context sizes. Very low entropy (<0.1) indicates highly deterministic transitions.
+
+**Branching Factor**
+> *Definition:* Average number of unique next tokens observed for each context.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High branching = many possible continuations (flexible but uncertain); low branching = few options (predictable but potentially repetitive).
+>
+> *What to seek:* Branching factor should decrease with context size. Values near 1.0 indicate nearly deterministic chains.
+
+**Predictability**
+> *Definition:* Derived metric: (1 - normalized_entropy) × 100%. Indicates how deterministic the model's predictions are.
+>
+> *Intuition:* 100% predictability means the next word is always certain; 0% means completely random. Real text falls between these extremes.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Higher predictability for text generation quality, but too high (>98%) may produce repetitive output.
+
+### Vocabulary & Zipf's Law Metrics
+
+**Zipf's Coefficient**
+> *Definition:* The slope of the log-log plot of word frequency vs. rank. Zipf's law predicts this should be approximately -1.
+>
+> *Intuition:* A coefficient near -1 indicates the corpus follows natural language patterns where a few words are very common and most words are rare.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Values between -0.8 and -1.2 indicate healthy natural language distribution. Deviations may suggest domain-specific or artificial text.
+
+**R² (Coefficient of Determination)**
+> *Definition:* Measures how well the linear fit explains the frequency-rank relationship. Ranges from 0 to 1.
+>
+> *Intuition:* R² near 1.0 means the data closely follows Zipf's law; lower values indicate deviation from expected word frequency patterns.
+>
+> *What to seek:* R² > 0.95 is excellent; > 0.99 indicates near-perfect Zipf adherence typical of large natural corpora.
+
+**Vocabulary Coverage**
+> *Definition:* Cumulative percentage of corpus tokens accounted for by the top N words.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Shows how concentrated word usage is. If top-100 words cover 50% of text, the corpus relies heavily on common words.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Top-100 covering 30-50% is typical. Higher coverage indicates more repetitive text; lower suggests richer vocabulary.
+
+### Word Embedding Metrics
+
+**Isotropy**
+> *Definition:* Measures how uniformly distributed vectors are in the embedding space. Computed as the ratio of minimum to maximum singular values.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High isotropy (near 1.0) means vectors spread evenly in all directions; low isotropy means vectors cluster in certain directions, reducing expressiveness.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Higher isotropy generally indicates better-quality embeddings. Values > 0.1 are reasonable; > 0.3 is good. Lower-dimensional embeddings tend to have higher isotropy.
+
+**Average Norm**
+> *Definition:* Mean magnitude (L2 norm) of word vectors in the embedding space.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Indicates the typical "length" of vectors. Consistent norms suggest stable training; high variance may indicate some words are undertrained.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Relatively consistent norms across models. The absolute value matters less than consistency (low std deviation).
+
+**Cosine Similarity**
+> *Definition:* Measures angular similarity between vectors, ranging from -1 (opposite) to 1 (identical direction).
+>
+> *Intuition:* Words with similar meanings should have high cosine similarity. This is the standard metric for semantic relatedness in embeddings.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Semantically related words should score > 0.5; unrelated words should be near 0. Synonyms often score > 0.7.
+
+**t-SNE Visualization**
+> *Definition:* t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding - a dimensionality reduction technique that preserves local structure for visualization.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Clusters in t-SNE plots indicate groups of semantically related words. Spread indicates vocabulary diversity; tight clusters suggest semantic coherence.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Meaningful clusters (e.g., numbers together, verbs together). Avoid over-interpreting distances - t-SNE preserves local, not global, structure.
+
+### General Interpretation Guidelines
+
+1. **Compare within model families:** Metrics are most meaningful when comparing models of the same type (e.g., 8k vs 64k tokenizer).
+2. **Consider trade-offs:** Better performance on one metric often comes at the cost of another (e.g., compression vs. OOV rate).
+3. **Context matters:** Optimal values depend on downstream tasks. Text generation may prioritize different metrics than classification.
+4. **Corpus influence:** All metrics are influenced by corpus characteristics. Wikipedia text differs from social media or literature.
+5. **Language-specific patterns:** Morphologically rich languages (like Arabic) may show different optimal ranges than analytic languages.
+
+
+### Visualizations Index
+
+| Visualization | Description |
+|---------------|-------------|
+| Tokenizer Compression | Compression ratios by vocabulary size |
+| Tokenizer Fertility | Average token length by vocabulary |
+| Tokenizer OOV | Unknown token rates |
+| Tokenizer Total Tokens | Total tokens by vocabulary |
+| N-gram Perplexity | Perplexity by n-gram size |
+| N-gram Entropy | Entropy by n-gram size |
+| N-gram Coverage | Top pattern coverage |
+| N-gram Unique | Unique n-gram counts |
+| Markov Entropy | Entropy by context size |
+| Markov Branching | Branching factor by context |
+| Markov Contexts | Unique context counts |
+| Zipf's Law | Frequency-rank distribution with fit |
+| Vocab Frequency | Word frequency distribution |
+| Top 20 Words | Most frequent words |
+| Vocab Coverage | Cumulative coverage curve |
+| Embedding Isotropy | Vector space uniformity |
+| Embedding Norms | Vector magnitude distribution |
+| Embedding Similarity | Word similarity heatmap |
+| Nearest Neighbors | Similar words for key terms |
+| t-SNE Words | 2D word embedding visualization |
+| t-SNE Sentences | 2D sentence embedding visualization |
+| Position Encoding | Encoding method comparison |
+| Model Sizes | Storage requirements |
+| Performance Dashboard | Comprehensive performance overview |
+
+---
+## About This Project
+
+### Data Source
+
+Models trained on [wikipedia-monthly](https://huggingface.co/datasets/omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly) - a monthly snapshot of Wikipedia articles across 300+ languages.
+
+### Project
+
+A project by **[Wikilangs](https://wikilangs.org)** - Open-source NLP models for every Wikipedia language.
+
+### Maintainer
+
+[Omar Kamali](https://omarkamali.com) - [Omneity Labs](https://omneitylabs.com)
+
+### Citation
+
+If you use these models in your research, please cite:
+
+```bibtex
+@misc{wikilangs2025,
+  author = {Kamali, Omar},
+  title = {Wikilangs: Open NLP Models for Wikipedia Languages},
+  year = {2025},
+  doi = {10.5281/zenodo.18073153},
+  publisher = {Zenodo},
+  url = {https://huggingface.co/wikilangs}
+  institution = {Omneity Labs}
+}
+```
+
+### License
+
+MIT License - Free for academic and commercial use.
+
+### Links
+
+- 🌐 Website: [wikilangs.org](https://wikilangs.org)
+- 🤗 Models: [huggingface.co/wikilangs](https://huggingface.co/wikilangs)
+- 📊 Data: [wikipedia-monthly](https://huggingface.co/datasets/omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly)
+- 👤 Author: [Omar Kamali](https://huggingface.co/omarkamali)
+- 🤝 Sponsor: [Featherless AI](https://featherless.ai)
+---
+*Generated by Wikilangs Models Pipeline*
+
+*Report Date: 2026-01-11 01:38:18*

models/embeddings/aligned/tg_128d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:a620e34f97690b02408b921be8d9ebe509174bcb2777d4997e8ce8eb830fe31e
+size 1143598288

models/embeddings/aligned/tg_128d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "tg", "dim": 128, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": true}

models/embeddings/aligned/tg_128d.projection.npy

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:b6b61cdb5aaab25d86a23ac45ab014824f49edb75aa8355a15f409b7588843cd
+size 65664

models/embeddings/aligned/tg_128d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+{
+  "language": "tg",
+  "dimension": 128,
+  "version": "aligned",
+  "hub_language": "en",
+  "seed_vocab_size": 12860,
+  "vocab_size": 114184
+}

models/embeddings/aligned/tg_32d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:b3b02925141dab97d90ca0b03bd1b3ae48d95bdb442c42b57f9b720c8a528881
+size 287904976

models/embeddings/aligned/tg_32d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "tg", "dim": 32, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": true}

models/embeddings/aligned/tg_32d.projection.npy

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:f06abd2d78505ccf0705c23e1616b12e74837dcb0427c9911733a40409b8463a
+size 4224

models/embeddings/aligned/tg_32d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+{
+  "language": "tg",
+  "dimension": 32,
+  "version": "aligned",
+  "hub_language": "en",
+  "seed_vocab_size": 12860,
+  "vocab_size": 114184
+}

models/embeddings/aligned/tg_64d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:1a2c3734cd63326b86546bde8da2b6488e662cf7df3f1d125f6bf952139df58c
+size 573136080

models/embeddings/aligned/tg_64d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "tg", "dim": 64, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": true}

models/embeddings/aligned/tg_64d.projection.npy

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:d2f23276eaa72600ab0bb671b2acb399ba383ca00b51682a6ae79387cdb6b0da
+size 16512

models/embeddings/aligned/tg_64d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+{
+  "language": "tg",
+  "dimension": 64,
+  "version": "aligned",
+  "hub_language": "en",
+  "seed_vocab_size": 12860,
+  "vocab_size": 114184
+}

models/embeddings/monolingual/tg_128d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:a620e34f97690b02408b921be8d9ebe509174bcb2777d4997e8ce8eb830fe31e
+size 1143598288

models/embeddings/monolingual/tg_128d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "tg", "dim": 128, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": false}

models/embeddings/monolingual/tg_128d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+{
+  "language": "tg",
+  "dimension": 128,
+  "version": "monolingual",
+  "training_params": {
+    "algorithm": "skipgram",
+    "min_count": 5,
+    "window": 5,
+    "negative": 5,
+    "epochs": 5,
+    "encoding_method": "rope",
+    "dim": 128,
+    "threads": 5
+  },
+  "vocab_size": 114184
+}

models/embeddings/monolingual/tg_32d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:b3b02925141dab97d90ca0b03bd1b3ae48d95bdb442c42b57f9b720c8a528881
+size 287904976

models/embeddings/monolingual/tg_32d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "tg", "dim": 32, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": false}

models/embeddings/monolingual/tg_32d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+{
+  "language": "tg",
+  "dimension": 32,
+  "version": "monolingual",
+  "training_params": {
+    "algorithm": "skipgram",
+    "min_count": 5,
+    "window": 5,
+    "negative": 5,
+    "epochs": 5,
+    "encoding_method": "rope",
+    "dim": 32,
+    "threads": 5
+  },
+  "vocab_size": 114184
+}

models/embeddings/monolingual/tg_64d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:1a2c3734cd63326b86546bde8da2b6488e662cf7df3f1d125f6bf952139df58c
+size 573136080

models/embeddings/monolingual/tg_64d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "tg", "dim": 64, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": false}

models/embeddings/monolingual/tg_64d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+{
+  "language": "tg",
+  "dimension": 64,
+  "version": "monolingual",
+  "training_params": {
+    "algorithm": "skipgram",
+    "min_count": 5,
+    "window": 5,
+    "negative": 5,
+    "epochs": 5,
+    "encoding_method": "rope",
+    "dim": 64,
+    "threads": 5
+  },
+  "vocab_size": 114184
+}

models/subword_markov/tg_markov_ctx1_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:5a96aa0598ec135df85396e5bd862e353f1bef100fe29b8dcaf768d0c3c52313
+size 211474

models/subword_markov/tg_markov_ctx1_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 1,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "tg",
+  "unique_contexts": 3218,
+  "total_transitions": 76746862
+}

models/subword_markov/tg_markov_ctx2_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:de1863998e40aa6d9acc75abb91d0b6ca8febe4ef1ec3f29047ff3d643d4f785
+size 1339028

models/subword_markov/tg_markov_ctx2_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 2,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "tg",
+  "unique_contexts": 25977,
+  "total_transitions": 76633021
+}

models/subword_markov/tg_markov_ctx3_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:70326fbde531ef98f4a6014f2ad4950a71d6579842d732c8d7051d0594ade0e0
+size 6129767

models/subword_markov/tg_markov_ctx3_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 3,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "tg",
+  "unique_contexts": 167557,
+  "total_transitions": 76519180
+}

models/subword_markov/tg_markov_ctx4_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:14ab189c0be2b19f4919d3552cab5d94fafd06d932275e2e4d03c4c7642a8dd0
+size 21840027

models/subword_markov/tg_markov_ctx4_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 4,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "tg",
+  "unique_contexts": 788521,
+  "total_transitions": 76405339
+}

models/subword_ngram/tg_2gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:9b346d73afe4d78c14361d9dd761fd0b1170eb2e8580b9b131f86ce01b8b115e
+size 141723

models/subword_ngram/tg_2gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 2,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "tg",
+  "unique_ngrams": 9876,
+  "total_ngrams": 76746862
+}

models/subword_ngram/tg_3gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:2b7f8ab6d06512cccf93c02ded687c43ba9e81f8b04a6aff0b300fbd46f47d4a
+size 1121734

models/subword_ngram/tg_3gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 3,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "tg",
+  "unique_ngrams": 85351,
+  "total_ngrams": 76633021
+}

models/subword_ngram/tg_4gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:8255cdca1458098a5e119df8446944be18bf67090c4168f3794c219a5a7970be
+size 6057435

models/subword_ngram/tg_4gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 4,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "tg",
+  "unique_ngrams": 471031,
+  "total_ngrams": 76519180
+}

models/subword_ngram/tg_5gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:05165fd43da0b525adb83f1acf5e0b8a93deb7ccb446d434f185e3b287ebf130
+size 17653142

models/subword_ngram/tg_5gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 5,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "tg",
+  "unique_ngrams": 1276489,
+  "total_ngrams": 76405339
+}

models/tokenizer/tg_tokenizer_16k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:c01aba7f51c8455597d838fdf18805a4e851c3dd4e26e452c8ce012eb9dc09f7
+size 570690

models/tokenizer/tg_tokenizer_32k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:ddbe8c0b8d829ffe89638ec4348c32ce4106e830909d8dd47164ceb6e53f4030
+size 917615

models/tokenizer/tg_tokenizer_64k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:1215bd000651f93b50ed2d725e995b65bceddb9d15e4a8586d5f01674885128d
+size 1631687

models/tokenizer/tg_tokenizer_8k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:48f8c50f3c54a5a567cd49183c8cd8ddb242623d91f7973ef41f4c3e45f90e63
+size 402434

models/vocabulary/tg_vocabulary.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:6dfcc079165f30e27b239321cc6156572218e8d7b711d19550c95897451ba847
+size 3688683

models/vocabulary/tg_vocabulary_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+{
+  "language": "tg",
+  "vocabulary_size": 215596,
+  "variant": "full",
+  "statistics": {
+    "type_token_ratio": 0.04529089760841573,
+    "coverage": {
+      "top_100": 0.34870400992606776,
+      "top_1000": 0.5915315110251209,
+      "top_5000": 0.7531537804080667,
+      "top_10000": 0.8137490320521833
+    },
+    "hapax_count": 291790,
+    "hapax_ratio": 0.5750848466453549,
+    "total_documents": 113841
+  }
+}

models/word_markov/tg_markov_ctx1_word.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:7d9429b33442520b9d9719d009c3bdfa96d70a8b48d147f8b7e521be1a8e7648
+size 41850399