Upload all models and assets for tn (latest)

.gitattributes

@@ -33,3 +33,10 @@ saved_model/**/* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *.zip filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *.zst filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *tfevents* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/embedding_similarity.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/embedding_tsne_multilingual.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/performance_dashboard.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/position_encoding_comparison.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/tsne_sentences.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/tsne_words.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/zipf_law.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text

README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,773 @@
+---
+language: tn
+language_name: Tswana
+language_family: bantu_southern
+tags:
+  - wikilangs
+  - nlp
+  - tokenizer
+  - embeddings
+  - n-gram
+  - markov
+  - wikipedia
+  - feature-extraction
+  - sentence-similarity
+  - tokenization
+  - n-grams
+  - markov-chain
+  - text-mining
+  - fasttext
+  - babelvec
+  - vocabulous
+  - vocabulary
+  - monolingual
+  - family-bantu_southern
+license: mit
+library_name: wikilangs
+pipeline_tag: text-generation
+datasets:
+  - omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly
+dataset_info:
+  name: wikipedia-monthly
+  description: Monthly snapshots of Wikipedia articles across 300+ languages
+metrics:
+  - name: best_compression_ratio
+    type: compression
+    value: 4.812
+  - name: best_isotropy
+    type: isotropy
+    value: 0.8424
+  - name: vocabulary_size
+    type: vocab
+    value: 0
+generated: 2026-01-11
+---
+
+# Tswana - Wikilangs Models
+## Comprehensive Research Report & Full Ablation Study
+
+This repository contains NLP models trained and evaluated by Wikilangs, specifically on **Tswana** Wikipedia data.
+We analyze tokenizers, n-gram models, Markov chains, vocabulary statistics, and word embeddings.
+
+## 📋 Repository Contents
+
+### Models & Assets
+
+- Tokenizers (8k, 16k, 32k, 64k)
+- N-gram models (2, 3, 4, 5-gram)
+- Markov chains (context of 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5)
+- Subword N-gram and Markov chains
+- Embeddings in various sizes and dimensions (aligned and unaligned)
+- Language Vocabulary
+- Language Statistics
+
+![Performance Dashboard](visualizations/performance_dashboard.png)
+
+### Analysis and Evaluation
+
+- [1. Tokenizer Evaluation](#1-tokenizer-evaluation)
+- [2. N-gram Model Evaluation](#2-n-gram-model-evaluation)
+- [3. Markov Chain Evaluation](#3-markov-chain-evaluation)
+- [4. Vocabulary Analysis](#4-vocabulary-analysis)
+- [5. Word Embeddings Evaluation](#5-word-embeddings-evaluation)
+- [6. Morphological Analysis (Experimental)](#6--morphological-analysis-experimental)
+- [7. Summary & Recommendations](#7-summary--recommendations)
+- [Metrics Glossary](#appendix-metrics-glossary--interpretation-guide)
+- [Visualizations Index](#visualizations-index)
+
+---
+## 1. Tokenizer Evaluation
+
+![Tokenizer Compression](visualizations/tokenizer_compression.png)
+
+![Tokenizer Fertility](visualizations/tokenizer_fertility.png)
+
+![Tokenizer OOV](visualizations/tokenizer_oov.png)
+
+![Total Tokens](visualizations/tokenizer_total_tokens.png)
+
+### Results
+
+| Vocab Size | Compression | Avg Token Len | UNK Rate | Total Tokens |
+|------------|-------------|---------------|----------|--------------|
+| **8k** | 4.418x | 4.42 | 0.0556% | 737,223 |
+| **16k** | 4.593x | 4.59 | 0.0578% | 709,175 |
+| **32k** | 4.727x | 4.73 | 0.0595% | 689,022 |
+| **64k** | 4.812x 🏆 | 4.81 | 0.0606% | 676,881 |
+
+### Tokenization Examples
+
+Below are sample sentences tokenized with each vocabulary size:
+
+**Sample 1:** `Need for Speed (NFS) ke motshameko wa motshikinyego o go thomiwang o o dirilweng...`
+
+| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
+|-------|--------|-------|
+| 8k | `▁need ▁for ▁spe ed ▁( nf s ) ▁ke ▁motshameko ... (+22 more)` | 32 |
+| 16k | `▁need ▁for ▁spe ed ▁( nf s ) ▁ke ▁motshameko ... (+19 more)` | 29 |
+| 32k | `▁need ▁for ▁spe ed ▁( nf s ) ▁ke ▁motshameko ... (+19 more)` | 29 |
+| 64k | `▁need ▁for ▁speed ▁( nf s ) ▁ke ▁motshameko ▁wa ... (+17 more)` | 27 |
+
+**Sample 2:** `Bekkersdal ke toropo ya Gauteng e ko lefatsheng la Aforika Borwa. Metswedi`
+
+| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
+|-------|--------|-------|
+| 8k | `▁be k kers dal ▁ke ▁toropo ▁ya ▁gauteng ▁e ▁ko ... (+6 more)` | 16 |
+| 16k | `▁be k kers dal ▁ke ▁toropo ▁ya ▁gauteng ▁e ▁ko ... (+6 more)` | 16 |
+| 32k | `▁be k kers dal ▁ke ▁toropo ▁ya ▁gauteng ▁e ▁ko ... (+6 more)` | 16 |
+| 64k | `▁bekkersdal ▁ke ▁toropo ▁ya ▁gauteng ▁e ▁ko ▁lefatsheng ▁la ▁aforika ... (+3 more)` | 13 |
+
+**Sample 3:** `Osaka ke toropo kgolo kwa Japan. E na le baagi ba le`
+
+| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
+|-------|--------|-------|
+| 8k | `▁o saka ▁ke ▁toropo ▁kgolo ▁kwa ▁japan . ▁e ▁na ... (+4 more)` | 14 |
+| 16k | `▁o saka ▁ke ▁toropo ▁kgolo ▁kwa ▁japan . ▁e ▁na ... (+4 more)` | 14 |
+| 32k | `▁osaka ▁ke ▁toropo ▁kgolo ▁kwa ▁japan . ▁e ▁na ▁le ... (+3 more)` | 13 |
+| 64k | `▁osaka ▁ke ▁toropo ▁kgolo ▁kwa ▁japan . ▁e ▁na ▁le ... (+3 more)` | 13 |
+
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Compression:** 64k achieves 4.812x compression
+- **Lowest UNK Rate:** 8k with 0.0556% unknown tokens
+- **Trade-off:** Larger vocabularies improve compression but increase model size
+- **Recommendation:** 32k vocabulary provides optimal balance for production use
+
+---
+## 2. N-gram Model Evaluation
+
+![N-gram Perplexity](visualizations/ngram_perplexity.png)
+
+![N-gram Unique](visualizations/ngram_unique.png)
+
+![N-gram Coverage](visualizations/ngram_coverage.png)
+
+### Results
+
+| N-gram | Variant | Perplexity | Entropy | Unique N-grams | Top-100 Coverage | Top-1000 Coverage |
+|--------|---------|------------|---------|----------------|------------------|-------------------|
+| **2-gram** | Word | 7,155 | 12.80 | 61,361 | 28.5% | 48.8% |
+| **2-gram** | Subword | 191 🏆 | 7.58 | 3,179 | 76.4% | 99.6% |
+| **3-gram** | Word | 14,210 | 13.79 | 120,191 | 25.9% | 38.6% |
+| **3-gram** | Subword | 1,323 | 10.37 | 26,297 | 38.5% | 81.3% |
+| **4-gram** | Word | 23,873 | 14.54 | 216,515 | 24.9% | 33.3% |
+| **4-gram** | Subword | 6,088 | 12.57 | 134,442 | 22.1% | 55.7% |
+| **5-gram** | Word | 10,743 | 13.39 | 157,061 | 32.2% | 39.1% |
+| **5-gram** | Subword | 18,500 | 14.18 | 344,305 | 15.2% | 39.9% |
+
+### Top 5 N-grams by Size
+
+**2-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `aforika borwa` | 32,436 |
+| 2 | `toropo ya` | 30,077 |
+| 3 | `ke toropo` | 29,904 |
+| 4 | `ya gauteng` | 29,770 |
+| 5 | `gauteng e` | 29,736 |
+
+**3-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `ke toropo ya` | 29,751 |
+| 2 | `ya gauteng e` | 29,733 |
+| 3 | `gauteng e aforika` | 29,718 |
+| 4 | `toropo ya gauteng` | 29,718 |
+| 5 | `e aforika borwa` | 29,717 |
+
+**4-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `ya gauteng e aforika` | 29,718 |
+| 2 | `gauteng e aforika borwa` | 29,717 |
+| 3 | `ke toropo ya gauteng` | 29,716 |
+| 4 | `toropo ya gauteng e` | 29,716 |
+| 5 | `mamelodi ke toropo ya` | 29,700 |
+
+**5-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `ya gauteng e aforika borwa` | 29,717 |
+| 2 | `ke toropo ya gauteng e` | 29,714 |
+| 3 | `toropo ya gauteng e aforika` | 29,706 |
+| 4 | `mamelodi ke toropo ya gauteng` | 29,700 |
+| 5 | `borwa mamelodi ke toropo ya` | 29,699 |
+
+**2-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `a _` | 935,894 |
+| 2 | `e _` | 661,328 |
+| 3 | `o _` | 427,244 |
+| 4 | `l e` | 283,587 |
+| 5 | `_ m` | 267,742 |
+
+**3-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `_ l e` | 169,796 |
+| 2 | `l e _` | 163,890 |
+| 3 | `n g _` | 148,572 |
+| 4 | `w a _` | 147,301 |
+| 5 | `y a _` | 133,144 |
+
+**4-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `_ y a _` | 122,807 |
+| 2 | `_ l e _` | 121,639 |
+| 3 | `e n g _` | 86,110 |
+| 4 | `_ g o _` | 81,757 |
+| 5 | `a _ b o` | 80,508 |
+
+**5-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `o _ y a _` | 65,761 |
+| 2 | `_ y a _ g` | 42,726 |
+| 3 | `_ k w a _` | 39,822 |
+| 4 | `a _ g o _` | 37,584 |
+| 5 | `k a _ b o` | 37,508 |
+
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Perplexity:** 2-gram (subword) with 191
+- **Entropy Trend:** Decreases with larger n-grams (more predictable)
+- **Coverage:** Top-1000 patterns cover ~40% of corpus
+- **Recommendation:** 4-gram or 5-gram for best predictive performance
+
+---
+## 3. Markov Chain Evaluation
+
+![Markov Entropy](visualizations/markov_entropy.png)
+
+![Markov Contexts](visualizations/markov_contexts.png)
+
+![Markov Branching](visualizations/markov_branching.png)
+
+### Results
+
+| Context | Variant | Avg Entropy | Perplexity | Branching Factor | Unique Contexts | Predictability |
+|---------|---------|-------------|------------|------------------|-----------------|----------------|
+| **1** | Word | 0.9132 | 1.883 | 6.97 | 102,696 | 8.7% |
+| **1** | Subword | 1.0155 | 2.022 | 7.94 | 975 | 0.0% |
+| **2** | Word | 0.3523 | 1.277 | 2.10 | 714,400 | 64.8% |
+| **2** | Subword | 0.9918 | 1.989 | 6.26 | 7,740 | 0.8% |
+| **3** | Word | 0.1700 | 1.125 | 1.38 | 1,497,396 | 83.0% |
+| **3** | Subword | 0.9000 | 1.866 | 4.58 | 48,443 | 10.0% |
+| **4** | Word | 0.0886 🏆 | 1.063 | 1.16 | 2,060,334 | 91.1% |
+| **4** | Subword | 0.6744 | 1.596 | 2.97 | 221,611 | 32.6% |
+
+### Generated Text Samples (Word-based)
+
+Below are text samples generated from each word-based Markov chain model:
+
+**Context Size 1:**
+
+1. `ya ntlha wa citylife ka beilby porteus bishopo wa batjho ba ba amegang mo melawaneng ya`
+2. `le balatedi bale mo dipolelong tsa itsholelo le tlhaeletsano pula botswana e diragalang bonnyane le ...`
+3. `e aforika borwa mamelodi ke marang rang a le 357 quoting from the namibian via africabib`
+
+**Context Size 2:**
+
+1. `aforika borwa mamelodi ke toropo ya gauteng e aforika borwa mamelodi ke toropo ya gauteng e aforika`
+2. `toropo ya gauteng e aforika borwa e tshwenyegile ka ditlamorago tse di nnang kwa kgaolong ya kweneng`
+3. `ke toropo ya gauteng e aforika borwa mamelodi ke toropo ya gauteng e aforika borwa mamelodi ke`
+
+**Context Size 3:**
+
+1. `ke toropo ya gauteng e aforika borwa mamelodi ke toropo ya gauteng e aforika borwa mamelodi ke torop...`
+2. `ya gauteng e aforika borwa mamelodi ke toropo ya gauteng e aforika borwa mamelodi ke toropo ya gaute...`
+3. `toropo ya gauteng e aforika borwa mamelodi ke toropo ya gauteng e aforika borwa mamelodi ke toropo y...`
+
+**Context Size 4:**
+
+1. `ya gauteng e aforika borwa mamelodi ke toropo ya gauteng e aforika borwa mamelodi ke toropo ya gaute...`
+2. `toropo ya gauteng e aforika borwa mamelodi ke toropo ya gauteng e aforika borwa mamelodi ke toropo y...`
+3. `ke toropo ya gauteng e aforika borwa mamelodi ke toropo ya gauteng e aforika borwa mamelodi ke torop...`
+
+
+### Generated Text Samples (Subword-based)
+
+Below are text samples generated from each subword-based Markov chain model:
+
+**Context Size 1:**
+
+1. `_tlanga_ssatllhe`
+2. `asophopolotlesha`
+3. `eg,_ne_kgipave_d`
+
+**Context Size 2:**
+
+1. `a_mo_tlhabews_fet`
+2. `e_neiratse_le_e_k`
+3. `o_tekgo_ke_e_bof_`
+
+**Context Size 3:**
+
+1. `_le_e_a_nna_e_tor_`
+2. `le_dipape_fa_tswa_`
+3. `ng_e_aforika_di_mo`
+
+**Context Size 4:**
+
+1. `_ya_borwa._mamelodi`
+2. `_le_mme_a_bonakgoba`
+3. `eng_of_ethiopia_re,`
+
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Predictability:** Context-4 (word) with 91.1% predictability
+- **Branching Factor:** Decreases with context size (more deterministic)
+- **Memory Trade-off:** Larger contexts require more storage (221,611 contexts)
+- **Recommendation:** Context-3 or Context-4 for text generation
+
+---
+## 4. Vocabulary Analysis
+
+![Zipf's Law](visualizations/zipf_law.png)
+
+![Top Words](visualizations/top20_words.png)
+
+![Coverage Curve](visualizations/vocab_coverage.png)
+
+### Statistics
+
+| Metric | Value |
+|--------|-------|
+| Vocabulary Size | 51,001 |
+| Total Tokens | 3,021,722 |
+| Mean Frequency | 59.25 |
+| Median Frequency | 4 |
+| Frequency Std Dev | 1394.66 |
+
+### Most Common Words
+
+| Rank | Word | Frequency |
+|------|------|-----------|
+| 1 | ya | 122,910 |
+| 2 | le | 122,280 |
+| 3 | e | 120,451 |
+| 4 | a | 105,517 |
+| 5 | go | 82,599 |
+| 6 | ka | 70,434 |
+| 7 | ba | 60,026 |
+| 8 | ne | 54,685 |
+| 9 | o | 51,263 |
+| 10 | ke | 50,884 |
+
+### Least Common Words (from vocabulary)
+
+| Rank | Word | Frequency |
+|------|------|-----------|
+| 1 | komit | 2 |
+| 2 | duduzane | 2 |
+| 3 | marčetić | 2 |
+| 4 | prijedor | 2 |
+| 5 | dnevne | 2 |
+| 6 | novosti | 2 |
+| 7 | greifenseelauf | 2 |
+| 8 | makithing | 2 |
+| 9 | benet | 2 |
+| 10 | linnen | 2 |
+
+### Zipf's Law Analysis
+
+| Metric | Value |
+|--------|-------|
+| Zipf Coefficient | 1.1378 |
+| R² (Goodness of Fit) | 0.995228 |
+| Adherence Quality | **excellent** |
+
+### Coverage Analysis
+
+| Top N Words | Coverage |
+|-------------|----------|
+| Top 100 | 57.2% |
+| Top 1,000 | 76.6% |
+| Top 5,000 | 89.3% |
+| Top 10,000 | 93.6% |
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Zipf Compliance:** R²=0.9952 indicates excellent adherence to Zipf's law
+- **High Frequency Dominance:** Top 100 words cover 57.2% of corpus
+- **Long Tail:** 41,001 words needed for remaining 6.4% coverage
+
+---
+## 5. Word Embeddings Evaluation
+
+![Embedding Isotropy](visualizations/embedding_isotropy.png)
+
+![Similarity Matrix](visualizations/embedding_similarity.png)
+
+![t-SNE Words](visualizations/tsne_words.png)
+
+![t-SNE Sentences](visualizations/tsne_sentences.png)
+
+
+### 5.1 Cross-Lingual Alignment
+
+![Alignment Quality](visualizations/embedding_alignment_quality.png)
+
+![Multilingual t-SNE](visualizations/embedding_tsne_multilingual.png)
+
+
+### 5.2 Model Comparison
+
+| Model | Dimension | Isotropy | Semantic Density | Alignment R@1 | Alignment R@10 |
+|-------|-----------|----------|------------------|---------------|----------------|
+| **mono_32d** | 32 | 0.8424 | 0.3285 | N/A | N/A |
+| **mono_64d** | 64 | 0.8282 | 0.2689 | N/A | N/A |
+| **mono_128d** | 128 | 0.7325 | 0.2225 | N/A | N/A |
+| **aligned_32d** | 32 | 0.8424 🏆 | 0.3391 | 0.0640 | 0.3560 |
+| **aligned_64d** | 64 | 0.8282 | 0.2702 | 0.1760 | 0.5100 |
+| **aligned_128d** | 128 | 0.7325 | 0.2209 | 0.2840 | 0.6440 |
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Isotropy:** aligned_32d with 0.8424 (more uniform distribution)
+- **Semantic Density:** Average pairwise similarity of 0.2751. Lower values indicate better semantic separation.
+- **Alignment Quality:** Aligned models achieve up to 28.4% R@1 in cross-lingual retrieval.
+- **Recommendation:** 128d aligned for best cross-lingual performance
+
+---
+## 6.  Morphological Analysis (Experimental)
+
+This section presents an automated morphological analysis derived from the statistical divergence between word-level and subword-level models. By analyzing where subword predictability spikes and where word-level coverage fails, we can infer linguistic structures without supervised data.
+
+### 6.1 Productivity & Complexity
+
+| Metric | Value | Interpretation | Recommendation |
+|--------|-------|----------------|----------------|
+| Productivity Index | **5.000** | High morphological productivity | Reliable analysis |
+| Idiomaticity Gap | **-0.020** | Low formulaic content | - |
+
+### 6.2 Affix Inventory (Productive Units)
+
+These are the most productive prefixes and suffixes identified by sampling the vocabulary for global substitutability patterns. A unit is considered an affix if stripping it leaves a valid stem that appears in other contexts.
+
+#### Productive Prefixes
+| Prefix | Examples |
+|--------|----------|
+| `-ma` | marcia, mahlatse, magudumana |
+| `-m` | moinjineere, marcia, membrane |
+| `-s` | sejaneng, still, stratification |
+| `-b` | bontshiwang, busiwa, bongz |
+| `-a` | adaptations, ausi, aug |
+| `-di` | diitsholelo, distinguished, dikhwaere |
+| `-mo` | moinjineere, motlabogi, monkeybone |
+| `-t` | thapisitsweng, thakanyo, tedx |
+
+#### Productive Suffixes
+| Suffix | Examples |
+|--------|----------|
+| `-e` | christine, ratilwe, legotlhe |
+| `-ng` | sejaneng, thapisitsweng, bontshiwang |
+| `-a` | otjozondjupa, zuma, marcia |
+| `-g` | rosberg, sejaneng, thapisitsweng |
+| `-s` | vermeers, adaptations, focuses |
+| `-o` | diitsholelo, phatlalatso, thakanyo |
+| `-n` | zeaxanthin, stratification, defection |
+| `-i` | shwahili, ausi, cpi |
+
+### 6.3 Bound Stems (Lexical Roots)
+
+Bound stems are high-frequency subword units that are semantically cohesive but rarely appear as standalone words. These often correspond to the 'core' of a word that requires inflection or derivation to be valid.
+
+| Stem | Cohesion | Substitutability | Examples |
+|------|----------|------------------|----------|
+| `tion` | 2.63x | 39 contexts | action, motion, notion |
+| `tsen` | 2.13x | 60 contexts | tseno, tsene, tsena |
+| `tlho` | 1.79x | 96 contexts | tlhoa, tlhopo, tlhora |
+| `tshw` | 2.08x | 46 contexts | tshwa, ntshwa, tshweu |
+| `otlh` | 1.78x | 67 contexts | otlhe, yotlhe, sotlhe |
+| `tshe` | 1.76x | 68 contexts | ntshe, tsheko, tshele |
+| `lhop` | 2.30x | 24 contexts | tlhopo, tlhopa, tlhopha |
+| `otsw` | 1.86x | 43 contexts | otswa, rotswe, motswe |
+| `hoph` | 2.25x | 21 contexts | tlhopha, tlhopho, tlhophe |
+| `mets` | 1.81x | 43 contexts | metso, metsi, metse |
+| `wana` | 1.98x | 30 contexts | swana, mowana, ntwana |
+| `gwag` | 2.28x | 18 contexts | ngwag, gwaga, ngwago |
+
+### 6.4 Affix Compatibility (Co-occurrence)
+
+This table shows which prefixes and suffixes most frequently co-occur on the same stems, revealing the 'stacking' rules of the language's morphology.
+
+| Prefix | Suffix | Frequency | Examples |
+|--------|--------|-----------|----------|
+| `-t` | `-g` | 121 words | tlhodileng, tlileng |
+| `-t` | `-ng` | 120 words | tlhodileng, tlileng |
+| `-t` | `-a` | 111 words | tshwaetswa, tsenngwa |
+| `-t` | `-e` | 108 words | takirambudde, togolese |
+| `-s` | `-e` | 95 words | setswerre, segololwane |
+| `-b` | `-i` | 93 words | bogasi, bukhari |
+| `-b` | `-e` | 90 words | blaze, banyamulenge |
+| `-di` | `-o` | 84 words | ditshenolo, dikago |
+| `-b` | `-g` | 83 words | benefitting, buang |
+| `-b` | `-ng` | 81 words | benefitting, buang |
+
+### 6.5 Recursive Morpheme Segmentation
+
+Using **Recursive Hierarchical Substitutability**, we decompose complex words into their constituent morphemes. This approach handles nested affixes (e.g., `prefix-prefix-root-suffix`).
+
+| Word | Suggested Split | Confidence | Stem |
+|------|-----------------|------------|------|
+| botshepegi | **`botshepe-g-i`** | 7.5 | `g` |
+| kgatlhego | **`kgatlhe-g-o`** | 7.5 | `g` |
+| prehistoric | **`p-re-historic`** | 7.5 | `historic` |
+| watergate | **`water-ga-te`** | 7.5 | `ga` |
+| eletsegang | **`eletseg-a-ng`** | 7.5 | `a` |
+| malahlela | **`malah-le-la`** | 7.5 | `le` |
+| botswanago | **`botswana-g-o`** | 7.5 | `g` |
+| ditlhagala | **`ditlhag-a-la`** | 7.5 | `a` |
+| motshidisi | **`motshi-di-si`** | 7.5 | `di` |
+| bosimegeng | **`bosimeg-e-ng`** | 7.5 | `e` |
+| northeast | **`northea-s-t`** | 7.5 | `s` |
+| diphethogo | **`diphetho-g-o`** | 7.5 | `g` |
+| rwandaise | **`rwanda-i-se`** | 7.5 | `i` |
+| utlwaleng | **`utlwa-le-ng`** | 7.5 | `le` |
+| kgatlhile | **`kgatlh-i-le`** | 7.5 | `i` |
+
+### 6.6 Linguistic Interpretation
+
+> **Automated Insight:**
+The language Tswana shows high morphological productivity. The subword models are significantly more efficient than word models, suggesting a rich system of affixation or compounding.
+
+---
+## 7. Summary & Recommendations
+
+![Performance Dashboard](visualizations/performance_dashboard.png)
+
+### Production Recommendations
+
+| Component | Recommended | Rationale |
+|-----------|-------------|-----------|
+| Tokenizer | **64k BPE** | Best compression (4.81x) |
+| N-gram | **2-gram** | Lowest perplexity (191) |
+| Markov | **Context-4** | Highest predictability (91.1%) |
+| Embeddings | **100d** | Balanced semantic capture and isotropy |
+
+
+---
+## Appendix: Metrics Glossary & Interpretation Guide
+
+This section provides definitions, intuitions, and guidance for interpreting the metrics used throughout this report.
+
+### Tokenizer Metrics
+
+**Compression Ratio**
+> *Definition:* The ratio of characters to tokens (chars/token). Measures how efficiently the tokenizer represents text.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Higher compression means fewer tokens needed to represent the same text, reducing sequence lengths for downstream models. A 3x compression means ~3 characters per token on average.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Higher is generally better for efficiency, but extremely high compression may indicate overly aggressive merging that loses morphological information.
+
+**Average Token Length (Fertility)**
+> *Definition:* Mean number of characters per token produced by the tokenizer.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Reflects the granularity of tokenization. Longer tokens capture more context but may struggle with rare words; shorter tokens are more flexible but increase sequence length.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Balance between 2-5 characters for most languages. Arabic/morphologically-rich languages may benefit from slightly longer tokens.
+
+**Unknown Token Rate (OOV Rate)**
+> *Definition:* Percentage of tokens that map to the unknown/UNK token, indicating words the tokenizer cannot represent.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Lower OOV means better vocabulary coverage. High OOV indicates the tokenizer encounters many unseen character sequences.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Below 1% is excellent; below 5% is acceptable. BPE tokenizers typically achieve very low OOV due to subword fallback.
+
+### N-gram Model Metrics
+
+**Perplexity**
+> *Definition:* Measures how "surprised" the model is by test data. Mathematically: 2^(cross-entropy). Lower values indicate better prediction.
+>
+> *Intuition:* If perplexity is 100, the model is as uncertain as if choosing uniformly among 100 options at each step. A perplexity of 10 means effectively choosing among 10 equally likely options.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Lower is better. Perplexity decreases with larger n-grams (more context). Values vary widely by language and corpus size.
+
+**Entropy**
+> *Definition:* Average information content (in bits) needed to encode the next token given the context. Related to perplexity: perplexity = 2^entropy.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High entropy means high uncertainty/randomness; low entropy means predictable patterns. Natural language typically has entropy between 1-4 bits per character.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Lower entropy indicates more predictable text patterns. Entropy should decrease as n-gram size increases.
+
+**Coverage (Top-K)**
+> *Definition:* Percentage of corpus occurrences explained by the top K most frequent n-grams.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High coverage with few patterns indicates repetitive/formulaic text; low coverage suggests diverse vocabulary usage.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Depends on use case. For language modeling, moderate coverage (40-60% with top-1000) is typical for natural text.
+
+### Markov Chain Metrics
+
+**Average Entropy**
+> *Definition:* Mean entropy across all contexts, measuring average uncertainty in next-word prediction.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Lower entropy means the model is more confident about what comes next. Context-1 has high entropy (many possible next words); Context-4 has low entropy (few likely continuations).
+>
+> *What to seek:* Decreasing entropy with larger context sizes. Very low entropy (<0.1) indicates highly deterministic transitions.
+
+**Branching Factor**
+> *Definition:* Average number of unique next tokens observed for each context.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High branching = many possible continuations (flexible but uncertain); low branching = few options (predictable but potentially repetitive).
+>
+> *What to seek:* Branching factor should decrease with context size. Values near 1.0 indicate nearly deterministic chains.
+
+**Predictability**
+> *Definition:* Derived metric: (1 - normalized_entropy) × 100%. Indicates how deterministic the model's predictions are.
+>
+> *Intuition:* 100% predictability means the next word is always certain; 0% means completely random. Real text falls between these extremes.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Higher predictability for text generation quality, but too high (>98%) may produce repetitive output.
+
+### Vocabulary & Zipf's Law Metrics
+
+**Zipf's Coefficient**
+> *Definition:* The slope of the log-log plot of word frequency vs. rank. Zipf's law predicts this should be approximately -1.
+>
+> *Intuition:* A coefficient near -1 indicates the corpus follows natural language patterns where a few words are very common and most words are rare.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Values between -0.8 and -1.2 indicate healthy natural language distribution. Deviations may suggest domain-specific or artificial text.
+
+**R² (Coefficient of Determination)**
+> *Definition:* Measures how well the linear fit explains the frequency-rank relationship. Ranges from 0 to 1.
+>
+> *Intuition:* R² near 1.0 means the data closely follows Zipf's law; lower values indicate deviation from expected word frequency patterns.
+>
+> *What to seek:* R² > 0.95 is excellent; > 0.99 indicates near-perfect Zipf adherence typical of large natural corpora.
+
+**Vocabulary Coverage**
+> *Definition:* Cumulative percentage of corpus tokens accounted for by the top N words.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Shows how concentrated word usage is. If top-100 words cover 50% of text, the corpus relies heavily on common words.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Top-100 covering 30-50% is typical. Higher coverage indicates more repetitive text; lower suggests richer vocabulary.
+
+### Word Embedding Metrics
+
+**Isotropy**
+> *Definition:* Measures how uniformly distributed vectors are in the embedding space. Computed as the ratio of minimum to maximum singular values.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High isotropy (near 1.0) means vectors spread evenly in all directions; low isotropy means vectors cluster in certain directions, reducing expressiveness.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Higher isotropy generally indicates better-quality embeddings. Values > 0.1 are reasonable; > 0.3 is good. Lower-dimensional embeddings tend to have higher isotropy.
+
+**Average Norm**
+> *Definition:* Mean magnitude (L2 norm) of word vectors in the embedding space.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Indicates the typical "length" of vectors. Consistent norms suggest stable training; high variance may indicate some words are undertrained.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Relatively consistent norms across models. The absolute value matters less than consistency (low std deviation).
+
+**Cosine Similarity**
+> *Definition:* Measures angular similarity between vectors, ranging from -1 (opposite) to 1 (identical direction).
+>
+> *Intuition:* Words with similar meanings should have high cosine similarity. This is the standard metric for semantic relatedness in embeddings.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Semantically related words should score > 0.5; unrelated words should be near 0. Synonyms often score > 0.7.
+
+**t-SNE Visualization**
+> *Definition:* t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding - a dimensionality reduction technique that preserves local structure for visualization.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Clusters in t-SNE plots indicate groups of semantically related words. Spread indicates vocabulary diversity; tight clusters suggest semantic coherence.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Meaningful clusters (e.g., numbers together, verbs together). Avoid over-interpreting distances - t-SNE preserves local, not global, structure.
+
+### General Interpretation Guidelines
+
+1. **Compare within model families:** Metrics are most meaningful when comparing models of the same type (e.g., 8k vs 64k tokenizer).
+2. **Consider trade-offs:** Better performance on one metric often comes at the cost of another (e.g., compression vs. OOV rate).
+3. **Context matters:** Optimal values depend on downstream tasks. Text generation may prioritize different metrics than classification.
+4. **Corpus influence:** All metrics are influenced by corpus characteristics. Wikipedia text differs from social media or literature.
+5. **Language-specific patterns:** Morphologically rich languages (like Arabic) may show different optimal ranges than analytic languages.
+
+
+### Visualizations Index
+
+| Visualization | Description |
+|---------------|-------------|
+| Tokenizer Compression | Compression ratios by vocabulary size |
+| Tokenizer Fertility | Average token length by vocabulary |
+| Tokenizer OOV | Unknown token rates |
+| Tokenizer Total Tokens | Total tokens by vocabulary |
+| N-gram Perplexity | Perplexity by n-gram size |
+| N-gram Entropy | Entropy by n-gram size |
+| N-gram Coverage | Top pattern coverage |
+| N-gram Unique | Unique n-gram counts |
+| Markov Entropy | Entropy by context size |
+| Markov Branching | Branching factor by context |
+| Markov Contexts | Unique context counts |
+| Zipf's Law | Frequency-rank distribution with fit |
+| Vocab Frequency | Word frequency distribution |
+| Top 20 Words | Most frequent words |
+| Vocab Coverage | Cumulative coverage curve |
+| Embedding Isotropy | Vector space uniformity |
+| Embedding Norms | Vector magnitude distribution |
+| Embedding Similarity | Word similarity heatmap |
+| Nearest Neighbors | Similar words for key terms |
+| t-SNE Words | 2D word embedding visualization |
+| t-SNE Sentences | 2D sentence embedding visualization |
+| Position Encoding | Encoding method comparison |
+| Model Sizes | Storage requirements |
+| Performance Dashboard | Comprehensive performance overview |
+
+---
+## About This Project
+
+### Data Source
+
+Models trained on [wikipedia-monthly](https://huggingface.co/datasets/omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly) - a monthly snapshot of Wikipedia articles across 300+ languages.
+
+### Project
+
+A project by **[Wikilangs](https://wikilangs.org)** - Open-source NLP models for every Wikipedia language.
+
+### Maintainer
+
+[Omar Kamali](https://omarkamali.com) - [Omneity Labs](https://omneitylabs.com)
+
+### Citation
+
+If you use these models in your research, please cite:
+
+```bibtex
+@misc{wikilangs2025,
+  author = {Kamali, Omar},
+  title = {Wikilangs: Open NLP Models for Wikipedia Languages},
+  year = {2025},
+  doi = {10.5281/zenodo.18073153},
+  publisher = {Zenodo},
+  url = {https://huggingface.co/wikilangs}
+  institution = {Omneity Labs}
+}
+```
+
+### License
+
+MIT License - Free for academic and commercial use.
+
+### Links
+
+- 🌐 Website: [wikilangs.org](https://wikilangs.org)
+- 🤗 Models: [huggingface.co/wikilangs](https://huggingface.co/wikilangs)
+- 📊 Data: [wikipedia-monthly](https://huggingface.co/datasets/omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly)
+- 👤 Author: [Omar Kamali](https://huggingface.co/omarkamali)
+- 🤝 Sponsor: [Featherless AI](https://featherless.ai)
+---
+*Generated by Wikilangs Models Pipeline*
+
+*Report Date: 2026-01-11 01:22:30*

models/embeddings/aligned/tn_128d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:88a0a2205ba67c422b2886b5bed608d51d50bb6228c481dcd5bbb1493177b5cd
+size 1055400750

models/embeddings/aligned/tn_128d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "tn", "dim": 128, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": true}

models/embeddings/aligned/tn_128d.projection.npy

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:4982b4a9918ee4b4d31d612b8938ed493d6174d306243881dd91e93e91025aec
+size 65664

models/embeddings/aligned/tn_128d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+{
+  "language": "tn",
+  "dimension": 128,
+  "version": "aligned",
+  "hub_language": "en",
+  "seed_vocab_size": 15309,
+  "vocab_size": 30158
+}

models/embeddings/aligned/tn_32d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:2f688d2144fa57447c9ddd3f729f91b0e9dee667e08ebadd17a9640f7e98f406
+size 264239406

models/embeddings/aligned/tn_32d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "tn", "dim": 32, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": true}

models/embeddings/aligned/tn_32d.projection.npy

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:8fee77c470180ca43712f7d301612e53a139b28eb1cd00d065447ad2c8e532ff
+size 4224

models/embeddings/aligned/tn_32d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+{
+  "language": "tn",
+  "dimension": 32,
+  "version": "aligned",
+  "hub_language": "en",
+  "seed_vocab_size": 15309,
+  "vocab_size": 30158
+}

models/embeddings/aligned/tn_64d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:7cd408e6c9228c4142f812cca04f5bae31432de99de8f5d251828ca9c331cb64
+size 527959854

models/embeddings/aligned/tn_64d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "tn", "dim": 64, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": true}

models/embeddings/aligned/tn_64d.projection.npy

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:760e3331e290dcea0bd15fd74a7c73b0d429e9407cb8598645ad9100dd4969af
+size 16512

models/embeddings/aligned/tn_64d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+{
+  "language": "tn",
+  "dimension": 64,
+  "version": "aligned",
+  "hub_language": "en",
+  "seed_vocab_size": 15309,
+  "vocab_size": 30158
+}

models/embeddings/monolingual/tn_128d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:88a0a2205ba67c422b2886b5bed608d51d50bb6228c481dcd5bbb1493177b5cd
+size 1055400750

models/embeddings/monolingual/tn_128d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "tn", "dim": 128, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": false}

models/embeddings/monolingual/tn_128d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+{
+  "language": "tn",
+  "dimension": 128,
+  "version": "monolingual",
+  "training_params": {
+    "algorithm": "skipgram",
+    "min_count": 5,
+    "window": 5,
+    "negative": 5,
+    "epochs": 5,
+    "encoding_method": "rope",
+    "dim": 128,
+    "threads": 5
+  },
+  "vocab_size": 30158
+}

models/embeddings/monolingual/tn_32d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:2f688d2144fa57447c9ddd3f729f91b0e9dee667e08ebadd17a9640f7e98f406
+size 264239406

models/embeddings/monolingual/tn_32d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "tn", "dim": 32, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": false}

models/embeddings/monolingual/tn_32d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+{
+  "language": "tn",
+  "dimension": 32,
+  "version": "monolingual",
+  "training_params": {
+    "algorithm": "skipgram",
+    "min_count": 5,
+    "window": 5,
+    "negative": 5,
+    "epochs": 5,
+    "encoding_method": "rope",
+    "dim": 32,
+    "threads": 5
+  },
+  "vocab_size": 30158
+}

models/embeddings/monolingual/tn_64d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:7cd408e6c9228c4142f812cca04f5bae31432de99de8f5d251828ca9c331cb64
+size 527959854

models/embeddings/monolingual/tn_64d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "tn", "dim": 64, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": false}

models/embeddings/monolingual/tn_64d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+{
+  "language": "tn",
+  "dimension": 64,
+  "version": "monolingual",
+  "training_params": {
+    "algorithm": "skipgram",
+    "min_count": 5,
+    "window": 5,
+    "negative": 5,
+    "epochs": 5,
+    "encoding_method": "rope",
+    "dim": 64,
+    "threads": 5
+  },
+  "vocab_size": 30158
+}

models/subword_markov/tn_markov_ctx1_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:5ad204c133517769a09f5a247d7b814ca33c4fec88c13957a81929bfd8924565
+size 63669

models/subword_markov/tn_markov_ctx1_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 1,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "tn",
+  "unique_contexts": 975,
+  "total_transitions": 17151535
+}

models/subword_markov/tn_markov_ctx2_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:83dd303ac93b5a00d71a39d4aacd916c0d07bf5670f5002045f5b1a556335c11
+size 395386

models/subword_markov/tn_markov_ctx2_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 2,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "tn",
+  "unique_contexts": 7740,
+  "total_transitions": 17147246
+}

models/subword_markov/tn_markov_ctx3_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:4748fd7f3e36fcfdfae290b71bb718c7ab2ff7ec37a898b10552d194ffea0dcf
+size 1662945

models/subword_markov/tn_markov_ctx3_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 3,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "tn",
+  "unique_contexts": 48443,
+  "total_transitions": 17142957
+}

models/subword_markov/tn_markov_ctx4_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:779a91334f9efeccc781fa858bf6822307737a0630af3846240cb5e9e548de4e
+size 4914201

models/subword_markov/tn_markov_ctx4_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 4,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "tn",
+  "unique_contexts": 221611,
+  "total_transitions": 17138668
+}

models/subword_ngram/tn_2gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:9d3918fba4a24dbfa5aaa1cc1d41b0f222b882568d2243089ed874910059eb44
+size 42825

models/subword_ngram/tn_2gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 2,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "tn",
+  "unique_ngrams": 3179,
+  "total_ngrams": 17151535
+}

models/subword_ngram/tn_3gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:0315016e29b59049d156e68af5437470af13800dc28509e464435789d274359c
+size 322629

models/subword_ngram/tn_3gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 3,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "tn",
+  "unique_ngrams": 26297,
+  "total_ngrams": 17147246
+}

models/subword_ngram/tn_4gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:9694ea6a5022f596aa70fbb869f003db466d2714a1d24ff91a2ddee3c28a037f
+size 1507816

models/subword_ngram/tn_4gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 4,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "tn",
+  "unique_ngrams": 134442,
+  "total_ngrams": 17142957
+}

models/subword_ngram/tn_5gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:62f271229e4bcaabe5d519403fc7df618f554fe1c7441811c9da881360f1750f
+size 3933758

models/subword_ngram/tn_5gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 5,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "tn",
+  "unique_ngrams": 344305,
+  "total_ngrams": 17138668
+}

models/tokenizer/tn_tokenizer_16k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:a69e8d6aad6f2c8e8cf3b859735fdc2e75ec1654fe29dcd4a4cee47fcf54854d
+size 511441

models/tokenizer/tn_tokenizer_32k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:11cf4fbdd8c2d3b41cc80ee8453495b6cf171d395a09b8dcf2cd293d7675157c
+size 789661

models/tokenizer/tn_tokenizer_64k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:1cbddefb3dc34f5afd4e874e9c5d7f4fed87ab8ce7a7896b84eb64958e2d4c3f
+size 1360100

models/tokenizer/tn_tokenizer_8k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:c77374f86c8547188de34e176d4cf7f77db59cfda30cbeb9fdaa38531b6a6138
+size 376246

models/vocabulary/tn_vocabulary.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:b7f6eb299a27e0531d0a5402925d3b103edda7fb56a36cdd24564a851811c5bd
+size 893871

models/vocabulary/tn_vocabulary_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+{
+  "language": "tn",
+  "vocabulary_size": 51001,
+  "variant": "full",
+  "statistics": {
+    "type_token_ratio": 0.033431257363417455,
+    "coverage": {
+      "top_100": 0.5623160264079277,
+      "top_1000": 0.7530167032648104,
+      "top_5000": 0.878447527242001,
+      "top_10000": 0.9198648693935944
+    },
+    "hapax_count": 51749,
+    "hapax_ratio": 0.503639902676399,
+    "total_documents": 4289
+  }
+}

models/word_markov/tn_markov_ctx1_word.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:80d5206623b017461b1e6dfd02beed646e2073a306e7d781a17cd81fe8f27fba
+size 5160658