Upload all models and assets for to (latest)

.gitattributes

@@ -33,3 +33,10 @@ saved_model/**/* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *.zip filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *.zst filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *tfevents* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/embedding_similarity.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/embedding_tsne_multilingual.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/performance_dashboard.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/position_encoding_comparison.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/tsne_sentences.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/tsne_words.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/zipf_law.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text

README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,771 @@
+---
+language: to
+language_name: Tongan
+language_family: austronesian_polynesian
+tags:
+  - wikilangs
+  - nlp
+  - tokenizer
+  - embeddings
+  - n-gram
+  - markov
+  - wikipedia
+  - feature-extraction
+  - sentence-similarity
+  - tokenization
+  - n-grams
+  - markov-chain
+  - text-mining
+  - fasttext
+  - babelvec
+  - vocabulous
+  - vocabulary
+  - monolingual
+  - family-austronesian_polynesian
+license: mit
+library_name: wikilangs
+pipeline_tag: text-generation
+datasets:
+  - omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly
+dataset_info:
+  name: wikipedia-monthly
+  description: Monthly snapshots of Wikipedia articles across 300+ languages
+metrics:
+  - name: best_compression_ratio
+    type: compression
+    value: 3.497
+  - name: best_isotropy
+    type: isotropy
+    value: 0.1197
+  - name: vocabulary_size
+    type: vocab
+    value: 0
+generated: 2026-01-11
+---
+
+# Tongan - Wikilangs Models
+## Comprehensive Research Report & Full Ablation Study
+
+This repository contains NLP models trained and evaluated by Wikilangs, specifically on **Tongan** Wikipedia data.
+We analyze tokenizers, n-gram models, Markov chains, vocabulary statistics, and word embeddings.
+
+## 📋 Repository Contents
+
+### Models & Assets
+
+- Tokenizers (8k, 16k, 32k, 64k)
+- N-gram models (2, 3, 4, 5-gram)
+- Markov chains (context of 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5)
+- Subword N-gram and Markov chains
+- Embeddings in various sizes and dimensions (aligned and unaligned)
+- Language Vocabulary
+- Language Statistics
+
+![Performance Dashboard](visualizations/performance_dashboard.png)
+
+### Analysis and Evaluation
+
+- [1. Tokenizer Evaluation](#1-tokenizer-evaluation)
+- [2. N-gram Model Evaluation](#2-n-gram-model-evaluation)
+- [3. Markov Chain Evaluation](#3-markov-chain-evaluation)
+- [4. Vocabulary Analysis](#4-vocabulary-analysis)
+- [5. Word Embeddings Evaluation](#5-word-embeddings-evaluation)
+- [6. Morphological Analysis (Experimental)](#6--morphological-analysis-experimental)
+- [7. Summary & Recommendations](#7-summary--recommendations)
+- [Metrics Glossary](#appendix-metrics-glossary--interpretation-guide)
+- [Visualizations Index](#visualizations-index)
+
+---
+## 1. Tokenizer Evaluation
+
+![Tokenizer Compression](visualizations/tokenizer_compression.png)
+
+![Tokenizer Fertility](visualizations/tokenizer_fertility.png)
+
+![Tokenizer OOV](visualizations/tokenizer_oov.png)
+
+![Total Tokens](visualizations/tokenizer_total_tokens.png)
+
+### Results
+
+| Vocab Size | Compression | Avg Token Len | UNK Rate | Total Tokens |
+|------------|-------------|---------------|----------|--------------|
+| **8k** | 3.249x | 3.26 | 0.0193% | 181,040 |
+| **16k** | 3.400x | 3.41 | 0.0202% | 173,006 |
+| **32k** | 3.497x 🏆 | 3.50 | 0.0208% | 168,209 |
+
+### Tokenization Examples
+
+Below are sample sentences tokenized with each vocabulary size:
+
+**Sample 1:** `*E.W. Gifford, Tongan myths and tales, Bernice Pauahi Bishop museum bulletin 8,`
+
+| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
+|-------|--------|-------|
+| 8k | `▁* e . w . ▁gifford , ▁tongan ▁myths ▁and ... (+10 more)` | 20 |
+| 16k | `▁* e . w . ▁gifford , ▁tongan ▁myths ▁and ... (+10 more)` | 20 |
+| 32k | `▁* e . w . ▁gifford , ▁tongan ▁myths ▁and ... (+10 more)` | 20 |
+
+**Sample 2:** `Ko Pulukalia ko ha fonua ia ʻi ʻEulope. ʻi ʻEulope`
+
+| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
+|-------|--------|-------|
+| 8k | `▁ko ▁puluka lia ▁ko ▁ha ▁fonua ▁ia ▁ʻ i ▁ʻ ... (+6 more)` | 16 |
+| 16k | `▁ko ▁pulukalia ▁ko ▁ha ▁fonua ▁ia ▁ʻ i ▁ʻ eulope ... (+5 more)` | 15 |
+| 32k | `▁ko ▁pulukalia ▁ko ▁ha ▁fonua ▁ia ▁ʻ i ▁ʻ eulope ... (+5 more)` | 15 |
+
+**Sample 3:** `*E. Wood-Ellem, Queen Sālote of Tonga, Auckland university press,`
+
+| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
+|-------|--------|-------|
+| 8k | `▁* e . ▁wood - ellem , ▁queen ▁sālote ▁of ... (+6 more)` | 16 |
+| 16k | `▁* e . ▁wood - ellem , ▁queen ▁sālote ▁of ... (+6 more)` | 16 |
+| 32k | `▁* e . ▁wood - ellem , ▁queen ▁sālote ▁of ... (+6 more)` | 16 |
+
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Compression:** 32k achieves 3.497x compression
+- **Lowest UNK Rate:** 8k with 0.0193% unknown tokens
+- **Trade-off:** Larger vocabularies improve compression but increase model size
+- **Recommendation:** 32k vocabulary provides optimal balance for production use
+
+---
+## 2. N-gram Model Evaluation
+
+![N-gram Perplexity](visualizations/ngram_perplexity.png)
+
+![N-gram Unique](visualizations/ngram_unique.png)
+
+![N-gram Coverage](visualizations/ngram_coverage.png)
+
+### Results
+
+| N-gram | Variant | Perplexity | Entropy | Unique N-grams | Top-100 Coverage | Top-1000 Coverage |
+|--------|---------|------------|---------|----------------|------------------|-------------------|
+| **2-gram** | Word | 948 | 9.89 | 3,349 | 42.1% | 79.1% |
+| **2-gram** | Subword | 208 🏆 | 7.70 | 1,246 | 74.3% | 99.8% |
+| **3-gram** | Word | 2,018 | 10.98 | 5,257 | 30.2% | 67.0% |
+| **3-gram** | Subword | 1,378 | 10.43 | 7,944 | 35.9% | 79.6% |
+| **4-gram** | Word | 2,947 | 11.53 | 8,403 | 28.6% | 57.9% |
+| **4-gram** | Subword | 5,492 | 12.42 | 31,079 | 20.2% | 53.5% |
+| **5-gram** | Word | 1,994 | 10.96 | 5,965 | 34.1% | 63.8% |
+| **5-gram** | Subword | 12,282 | 13.58 | 57,462 | 14.5% | 40.7% |
+
+### Top 5 N-grams by Size
+
+**2-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `ko e` | 4,790 |
+| 2 | `ʻi he` | 2,011 |
+| 3 | `ʻo e` | 1,405 |
+| 4 | `ʻa e` | 1,335 |
+| 5 | `mo e` | 1,134 |
+
+**3-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `ʻi he ngaahi` | 431 |
+| 2 | `ko e fuʻu` | 383 |
+| 3 | `e fuʻu ʻakau` | 375 |
+| 4 | `hingoa ʻi he` | 341 |
+| 5 | `he ngaahi lea` | 336 |
+
+**4-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `ko e fuʻu ʻakau` | 365 |
+| 2 | `ʻi he ngaahi lea` | 335 |
+| 3 | `he ngaahi lea kehe` | 331 |
+| 4 | `hingoa ʻi he ngaahi` | 328 |
+| 5 | `vaʻa fekumi ngoue vainī` | 309 |
+
+**5-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `ʻi he ngaahi lea kehe` | 331 |
+| 2 | `hingoa ʻi he ngaahi lea` | 328 |
+| 3 | `hokohoko ngaahi ʻakau vaʻa fekumi` | 309 |
+| 4 | `ngaahi ʻakau vaʻa fekumi ngoue` | 309 |
+| 5 | `ʻakau vaʻa fekumi ngoue vainī` | 309 |
+
+**2-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `e _` | 28,242 |
+| 2 | `a _` | 24,953 |
+| 3 | `i _` | 22,182 |
+| 4 | `o _` | 19,549 |
+| 5 | `_ ʻ` | 19,509 |
+
+**3-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `_ e _` | 9,332 |
+| 2 | `n g a` | 8,789 |
+| 3 | `k o _` | 7,921 |
+| 4 | `h e _` | 7,566 |
+| 5 | `o _ e` | 7,505 |
+
+**4-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `o _ e _` | 7,450 |
+| 2 | `_ k o _` | 5,828 |
+| 3 | `k o _ e` | 4,823 |
+| 4 | `_ h e _` | 4,523 |
+| 5 | `_ ʻ i _` | 3,803 |
+
+**5-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `k o _ e _` | 4,799 |
+| 2 | `_ k o _ e` | 4,059 |
+| 3 | `i _ h e _` | 3,520 |
+| 4 | `_ f a k a` | 3,147 |
+| 5 | `ʻ o k u _` | 2,999 |
+
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Perplexity:** 2-gram (subword) with 208
+- **Entropy Trend:** Decreases with larger n-grams (more predictable)
+- **Coverage:** Top-1000 patterns cover ~41% of corpus
+- **Recommendation:** 4-gram or 5-gram for best predictive performance
+
+---
+## 3. Markov Chain Evaluation
+
+![Markov Entropy](visualizations/markov_entropy.png)
+
+![Markov Contexts](visualizations/markov_contexts.png)
+
+![Markov Branching](visualizations/markov_branching.png)
+
+### Results
+
+| Context | Variant | Avg Entropy | Perplexity | Branching Factor | Unique Contexts | Predictability |
+|---------|---------|-------------|------------|------------------|-----------------|----------------|
+| **1** | Word | 0.7580 | 1.691 | 4.11 | 15,572 | 24.2% |
+| **1** | Subword | 0.8923 | 1.856 | 6.74 | 432 | 10.8% |
+| **2** | Word | 0.2407 | 1.182 | 1.56 | 63,563 | 75.9% |
+| **2** | Subword | 0.9268 | 1.901 | 5.18 | 2,905 | 7.3% |
+| **3** | Word | 0.1088 | 1.078 | 1.20 | 98,178 | 89.1% |
+| **3** | Subword | 0.7964 | 1.737 | 3.51 | 15,009 | 20.4% |
+| **4** | Word | 0.0474 🏆 | 1.033 | 1.07 | 116,582 | 95.3% |
+| **4** | Subword | 0.5667 | 1.481 | 2.28 | 52,648 | 43.3% |
+
+### Generated Text Samples (Word-based)
+
+Below are text samples generated from each word-based Markov chain model:
+
+**Context Size 1:**
+
+1. `e limufonua ko e ʻakau kālava maʻa e ongo foha ʻo tonga land acts v l`
+2. `ko e vahe hihifo ʻo e meʻa kelekele mo e matalaʻiʻakau kula kuusi ko e lotu`
+3. `he ngaahi lau ʻoku mamaha ʻa ha alaufuli pea ʻoku ui foki ko e pī pea`
+
+**Context Size 2:**
+
+1. `ko e motuʻa feituʻu ʻi he talatupuʻa ʻo ʻahoʻeitu ʻi he taimi ni koeʻuhi ʻenau hiki ki`
+2. `ʻi he ngaahi lea kehe ʻara lea fakakuki kalabuci damu lea fakafisi pūrau lea fakatahisi hutu he`
+3. `ʻo e lea heliaki ko e matapā ʻeni tokua naʻe ʻomi ki tongá ni ʻi tongá ni`
+
+**Context Size 3:**
+
+1. `ʻi he ngaahi lea kehe tōmāti lea fakakuki lea fakatahisi ʻōhiʻa ma ka nahele lea fakahauaiʻi s pimpi...`
+2. `ko e fuʻu ʻakau lahi ia ʻoku tupu ofi ki he haʻamonga ʻa maui pupunga fetuʻu ko e`
+3. `e fuʻu ʻakau siʻi ia mei he ʻatamai ʻo māmani ʻa ia ʻoku hoko ai ʻa e ngaahi`
+
+**Context Size 4:**
+
+1. `ko e fuʻu ʻakau lahi ia mo e ngaahi ngeʻesi ʻelilivao ʻoku ui ko e nati foki ʻoku kulokula`
+2. `ʻi he ngaahi lea kehe mākeke lea fakahauaiʻi masitati kapisi lea fakahaʻamoa kāpati lea fakakuki pīn...`
+3. `he ngaahi lea kehe toua lea fakaniuē malina lea fakahaʻamoa rōpiāni piāni lea fakakuki tataku hokoho...`
+
+
+### Generated Text Samples (Subword-based)
+
+Below are text samples generated from each subword-based Markov chain model:
+
+**Context Size 1:**
+
+1. `_nofo_pue,_kae_b`
+2. `au,_hi_ngaʻau_i_`
+3. `ita_hi_ctowo_ʻot`
+
+**Context Size 2:**
+
+1. `e_ressia_motonga_`
+2. `a_kā_ku_meʻa,_por`
+3. `i_loquene,_va_‘e_`
+
+**Context Size 3:**
+
+1. `_e_pea._ko_e_ngaah`
+2. `ngaahi_aʻu._kolo_ʻ`
+3. `ko_hono_puʻangua_s`
+
+**Context Size 4:**
+
+1. `o_e_hine_taha_micro`
+2. `_ko_e_tuituitaha_ko`
+3. `ko_e_taha_kā_ko_e_h`
+
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Predictability:** Context-4 (word) with 95.3% predictability
+- **Branching Factor:** Decreases with context size (more deterministic)
+- **Memory Trade-off:** Larger contexts require more storage (52,648 contexts)
+- **Recommendation:** Context-3 or Context-4 for text generation
+
+---
+## 4. Vocabulary Analysis
+
+![Zipf's Law](visualizations/zipf_law.png)
+
+![Top Words](visualizations/top20_words.png)
+
+![Coverage Curve](visualizations/vocab_coverage.png)
+
+### Statistics
+
+| Metric | Value |
+|--------|-------|
+| Vocabulary Size | 6,787 |
+| Total Tokens | 149,227 |
+| Mean Frequency | 21.99 |
+| Median Frequency | 3 |
+| Frequency Std Dev | 193.13 |
+
+### Most Common Words
+
+| Rank | Word | Frequency |
+|------|------|-----------|
+| 1 | e | 9,737 |
+| 2 | ko | 7,170 |
+| 3 | he | 4,551 |
+| 4 | ʻi | 3,854 |
+| 5 | ʻo | 3,196 |
+| 6 | ʻoku | 2,983 |
+| 7 | ia | 2,271 |
+| 8 | ngaahi | 2,189 |
+| 9 | ʻa | 2,030 |
+| 10 | mo | 1,983 |
+
+### Least Common Words (from vocabulary)
+
+| Rank | Word | Frequency |
+|------|------|-----------|
+| 1 | fohi | 2 |
+| 2 | tekau | 2 |
+| 3 | fakapā | 2 |
+| 4 | fahaʻi | 2 |
+| 5 | mutumutu | 2 |
+| 6 | koká | 2 |
+| 7 | mahoaʻá | 2 |
+| 8 | kaí | 2 |
+| 9 | lauʻolungá | 2 |
+| 10 | folahi | 2 |
+
+### Zipf's Law Analysis
+
+| Metric | Value |
+|--------|-------|
+| Zipf Coefficient | 1.1311 |
+| R² (Goodness of Fit) | 0.992429 |
+| Adherence Quality | **excellent** |
+
+### Coverage Analysis
+
+| Top N Words | Coverage |
+|-------------|----------|
+| Top 100 | 56.6% |
+| Top 1,000 | 83.9% |
+| Top 5,000 | 97.6% |
+| Top 10,000 | 0.0% |
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Zipf Compliance:** R²=0.9924 indicates excellent adherence to Zipf's law
+- **High Frequency Dominance:** Top 100 words cover 56.6% of corpus
+- **Long Tail:** -3,213 words needed for remaining 100.0% coverage
+
+---
+## 5. Word Embeddings Evaluation
+
+![Embedding Isotropy](visualizations/embedding_isotropy.png)
+
+![Similarity Matrix](visualizations/embedding_similarity.png)
+
+![t-SNE Words](visualizations/tsne_words.png)
+
+![t-SNE Sentences](visualizations/tsne_sentences.png)
+
+
+### 5.1 Cross-Lingual Alignment
+
+![Alignment Quality](visualizations/embedding_alignment_quality.png)
+
+![Multilingual t-SNE](visualizations/embedding_tsne_multilingual.png)
+
+
+### 5.2 Model Comparison
+
+| Model | Dimension | Isotropy | Semantic Density | Alignment R@1 | Alignment R@10 |
+|-------|-----------|----------|------------------|---------------|----------------|
+| **mono_32d** | 32 | 0.1197 🏆 | 0.5003 | N/A | N/A |
+| **mono_64d** | 64 | 0.0193 | 0.5134 | N/A | N/A |
+| **mono_128d** | 128 | 0.0028 | 0.4946 | N/A | N/A |
+| **aligned_32d** | 32 | 0.1197 | 0.4991 | 0.0100 | 0.0900 |
+| **aligned_64d** | 64 | 0.0193 | 0.5081 | 0.0140 | 0.0980 |
+| **aligned_128d** | 128 | 0.0028 | 0.5043 | 0.0140 | 0.0920 |
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Isotropy:** mono_32d with 0.1197 (more uniform distribution)
+- **Semantic Density:** Average pairwise similarity of 0.5033. Lower values indicate better semantic separation.
+- **Alignment Quality:** Aligned models achieve up to 1.4% R@1 in cross-lingual retrieval.
+- **Recommendation:** 128d aligned for best cross-lingual performance
+
+---
+## 6.  Morphological Analysis (Experimental)
+
+This section presents an automated morphological analysis derived from the statistical divergence between word-level and subword-level models. By analyzing where subword predictability spikes and where word-level coverage fails, we can infer linguistic structures without supervised data.
+
+### 6.1 Productivity & Complexity
+
+| Metric | Value | Interpretation | Recommendation |
+|--------|-------|----------------|----------------|
+| Productivity Index | **5.000** | High morphological productivity | Reliable analysis |
+| Idiomaticity Gap | **0.569** | High formulaic/idiomatic content | - |
+
+### 6.2 Affix Inventory (Productive Units)
+
+These are the most productive prefixes and suffixes identified by sampling the vocabulary for global substitutability patterns. A unit is considered an affix if stripping it leaves a valid stem that appears in other contexts.
+
+#### Productive Prefixes
+| Prefix | Examples |
+|--------|----------|
+| `-t` | translation, totokamaka, tooi |
+| `-s` | seen, state, surely |
+| `-m` | mole, maʻamaʻa, menemene |
+| `-p` | parazoa, puna, palm |
+| `-ma` | maʻamaʻa, mamata, masipā |
+| `-f` | foo, fimbristylis, floribunda |
+| `-l` | lafalafa, laufale, longomapu |
+| `-k` | kākā, kelenatā, kakamika |
+
+#### Productive Suffixes
+| Suffix | Examples |
+|--------|----------|
+| `-a` | ʻekea, floribunda, maʻamaʻa |
+| `-i` | hui, tooi, tuki |
+| `-e` | mole, because, menemene |
+| `-u` | tatafu, longomapu, tāupoʻou |
+| `-s` | fimbristylis, berenices, occidentalis |
+| `-o` | foo, epikopo, sio |
+| `-ia` | pilitania, ʻaositelēlia, terminalia |
+| `-ga` | moʻunga, hengehenga, taunga |
+
+### 6.3 Bound Stems (Lexical Roots)
+
+Bound stems are high-frequency subword units that are semantically cohesive but rarely appear as standalone words. These often correspond to the 'core' of a word that requires inflection or derivation to be valid.
+
+| Stem | Cohesion | Substitutability | Examples |
+|------|----------|------------------|----------|
+| `akat` | 1.59x | 25 contexts | kakato, fakatu, fakatū |
+| `onga` | 1.41x | 25 contexts | konga, tonga, nonga |
+| `ngat` | 1.64x | 15 contexts | ngata, ngatú, ngatu |
+| `ʻang` | 1.66x | 12 contexts | ʻanga, paʻanga, hūʻanga |
+| `kata` | 1.53x | 15 contexts | katafa, fakatau, akataha |
+| `kala` | 1.38x | 19 contexts | kalae, kalasi, kakala |
+| `hing` | 1.53x | 13 contexts | thing, hinga, ahinga |
+| `ʻaka` | 1.71x | 8 contexts | ʻakau, ʻakaú, ʻakana |
+| `akah` | 1.56x | 10 contexts | fakahū, fakaha, fakahā |
+| `tata` | 1.49x | 11 contexts | tatau, tatafu, tatala |
+| `akal` | 1.48x | 11 contexts | kakala, fakalao, fakalau |
+| `ahin` | 1.48x | 10 contexts | vahine, ahinga, mahino |
+
+### 6.4 Affix Compatibility (Co-occurrence)
+
+This table shows which prefixes and suffixes most frequently co-occur on the same stems, revealing the 'stacking' rules of the language's morphology.
+
+| Prefix | Suffix | Frequency | Examples |
+|--------|--------|-----------|----------|
+| `-f` | `-a` | 152 words | floribunda, fukofuka |
+| `-t` | `-a` | 143 words | totokamaka, taunga |
+| `-f` | `-i` | 123 words | fakafefiofi, falevai |
+| `-m` | `-a` | 122 words | maʻamaʻa, moʻunga |
+| `-ʻ` | `-a` | 77 words | ʻekea, ʻalava |
+| `-t` | `-u` | 74 words | tatafu, tāupoʻou |
+| `-t` | `-i` | 70 words | tooi, tuki |
+| `-p` | `-a` | 66 words | parazoa, puna |
+| `-l` | `-a` | 64 words | lafalafa, laveʻimoa |
+| `-k` | `-a` | 52 words | kakamika, kulukona |
+
+### 6.5 Recursive Morpheme Segmentation
+
+Using **Recursive Hierarchical Substitutability**, we decompose complex words into their constituent morphemes. This approach handles nested affixes (e.g., `prefix-prefix-root-suffix`).
+
+| Word | Suggested Split | Confidence | Stem |
+|------|-----------------|------------|------|
+| ʻafilikani | **`ʻafilik-a-ni`** | 7.5 | `a` |
+| fetuʻutaki | **`fetuʻut-a-ki`** | 7.5 | `a` |
+| talafoʻou | **`ta-la-foʻou`** | 7.5 | `foʻou` |
+| fakataimi | **`fa-ka-taimi`** | 7.5 | `taimi` |
+| fehokotaki | **`fehokot-a-ki`** | 7.5 | `a` |
+| polotonga | **`po-lo-tonga`** | 7.5 | `tonga` |
+| sterninae | **`sternin-a-e`** | 7.5 | `a` |
+| christian | **`christi-a-n`** | 7.5 | `a` |
+| lauraceae | **`laurace-a-e`** | 7.5 | `a` |
+| siulolovao | **`siulolov-a-o`** | 7.5 | `a` |
+| vavalangi | **`va-va-langi`** | 7.5 | `langi` |
+| grossulariaceae | **`grossulariace-a-e`** | 7.5 | `a` |
+| fakakakai | **`fakakak-a-i`** | 7.5 | `a` |
+| matafanga | **`ma-ta-fanga`** | 7.5 | `fanga` |
+| afuhaʻapai | **`afuhaʻap-a-i`** | 7.5 | `a` |
+
+### 6.6 Linguistic Interpretation
+
+> **Automated Insight:**
+The language Tongan shows high morphological productivity. The subword models are significantly more efficient than word models, suggesting a rich system of affixation or compounding.
+
+> **Note on Idiomaticity:** The high Idiomaticity Gap suggests a large number of frequent multi-word expressions or formulaic sequences that are statistically distinct from their component parts.
+
+---
+## 7. Summary & Recommendations
+
+![Performance Dashboard](visualizations/performance_dashboard.png)
+
+### Production Recommendations
+
+| Component | Recommended | Rationale |
+|-----------|-------------|-----------|
+| Tokenizer | **32k BPE** | Best compression (3.50x) |
+| N-gram | **2-gram** | Lowest perplexity (208) |
+| Markov | **Context-4** | Highest predictability (95.3%) |
+| Embeddings | **100d** | Balanced semantic capture and isotropy |
+
+
+---
+## Appendix: Metrics Glossary & Interpretation Guide
+
+This section provides definitions, intuitions, and guidance for interpreting the metrics used throughout this report.
+
+### Tokenizer Metrics
+
+**Compression Ratio**
+> *Definition:* The ratio of characters to tokens (chars/token). Measures how efficiently the tokenizer represents text.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Higher compression means fewer tokens needed to represent the same text, reducing sequence lengths for downstream models. A 3x compression means ~3 characters per token on average.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Higher is generally better for efficiency, but extremely high compression may indicate overly aggressive merging that loses morphological information.
+
+**Average Token Length (Fertility)**
+> *Definition:* Mean number of characters per token produced by the tokenizer.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Reflects the granularity of tokenization. Longer tokens capture more context but may struggle with rare words; shorter tokens are more flexible but increase sequence length.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Balance between 2-5 characters for most languages. Arabic/morphologically-rich languages may benefit from slightly longer tokens.
+
+**Unknown Token Rate (OOV Rate)**
+> *Definition:* Percentage of tokens that map to the unknown/UNK token, indicating words the tokenizer cannot represent.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Lower OOV means better vocabulary coverage. High OOV indicates the tokenizer encounters many unseen character sequences.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Below 1% is excellent; below 5% is acceptable. BPE tokenizers typically achieve very low OOV due to subword fallback.
+
+### N-gram Model Metrics
+
+**Perplexity**
+> *Definition:* Measures how "surprised" the model is by test data. Mathematically: 2^(cross-entropy). Lower values indicate better prediction.
+>
+> *Intuition:* If perplexity is 100, the model is as uncertain as if choosing uniformly among 100 options at each step. A perplexity of 10 means effectively choosing among 10 equally likely options.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Lower is better. Perplexity decreases with larger n-grams (more context). Values vary widely by language and corpus size.
+
+**Entropy**
+> *Definition:* Average information content (in bits) needed to encode the next token given the context. Related to perplexity: perplexity = 2^entropy.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High entropy means high uncertainty/randomness; low entropy means predictable patterns. Natural language typically has entropy between 1-4 bits per character.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Lower entropy indicates more predictable text patterns. Entropy should decrease as n-gram size increases.
+
+**Coverage (Top-K)**
+> *Definition:* Percentage of corpus occurrences explained by the top K most frequent n-grams.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High coverage with few patterns indicates repetitive/formulaic text; low coverage suggests diverse vocabulary usage.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Depends on use case. For language modeling, moderate coverage (40-60% with top-1000) is typical for natural text.
+
+### Markov Chain Metrics
+
+**Average Entropy**
+> *Definition:* Mean entropy across all contexts, measuring average uncertainty in next-word prediction.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Lower entropy means the model is more confident about what comes next. Context-1 has high entropy (many possible next words); Context-4 has low entropy (few likely continuations).
+>
+> *What to seek:* Decreasing entropy with larger context sizes. Very low entropy (<0.1) indicates highly deterministic transitions.
+
+**Branching Factor**
+> *Definition:* Average number of unique next tokens observed for each context.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High branching = many possible continuations (flexible but uncertain); low branching = few options (predictable but potentially repetitive).
+>
+> *What to seek:* Branching factor should decrease with context size. Values near 1.0 indicate nearly deterministic chains.
+
+**Predictability**
+> *Definition:* Derived metric: (1 - normalized_entropy) × 100%. Indicates how deterministic the model's predictions are.
+>
+> *Intuition:* 100% predictability means the next word is always certain; 0% means completely random. Real text falls between these extremes.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Higher predictability for text generation quality, but too high (>98%) may produce repetitive output.
+
+### Vocabulary & Zipf's Law Metrics
+
+**Zipf's Coefficient**
+> *Definition:* The slope of the log-log plot of word frequency vs. rank. Zipf's law predicts this should be approximately -1.
+>
+> *Intuition:* A coefficient near -1 indicates the corpus follows natural language patterns where a few words are very common and most words are rare.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Values between -0.8 and -1.2 indicate healthy natural language distribution. Deviations may suggest domain-specific or artificial text.
+
+**R² (Coefficient of Determination)**
+> *Definition:* Measures how well the linear fit explains the frequency-rank relationship. Ranges from 0 to 1.
+>
+> *Intuition:* R² near 1.0 means the data closely follows Zipf's law; lower values indicate deviation from expected word frequency patterns.
+>
+> *What to seek:* R² > 0.95 is excellent; > 0.99 indicates near-perfect Zipf adherence typical of large natural corpora.
+
+**Vocabulary Coverage**
+> *Definition:* Cumulative percentage of corpus tokens accounted for by the top N words.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Shows how concentrated word usage is. If top-100 words cover 50% of text, the corpus relies heavily on common words.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Top-100 covering 30-50% is typical. Higher coverage indicates more repetitive text; lower suggests richer vocabulary.
+
+### Word Embedding Metrics
+
+**Isotropy**
+> *Definition:* Measures how uniformly distributed vectors are in the embedding space. Computed as the ratio of minimum to maximum singular values.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High isotropy (near 1.0) means vectors spread evenly in all directions; low isotropy means vectors cluster in certain directions, reducing expressiveness.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Higher isotropy generally indicates better-quality embeddings. Values > 0.1 are reasonable; > 0.3 is good. Lower-dimensional embeddings tend to have higher isotropy.
+
+**Average Norm**
+> *Definition:* Mean magnitude (L2 norm) of word vectors in the embedding space.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Indicates the typical "length" of vectors. Consistent norms suggest stable training; high variance may indicate some words are undertrained.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Relatively consistent norms across models. The absolute value matters less than consistency (low std deviation).
+
+**Cosine Similarity**
+> *Definition:* Measures angular similarity between vectors, ranging from -1 (opposite) to 1 (identical direction).
+>
+> *Intuition:* Words with similar meanings should have high cosine similarity. This is the standard metric for semantic relatedness in embeddings.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Semantically related words should score > 0.5; unrelated words should be near 0. Synonyms often score > 0.7.
+
+**t-SNE Visualization**
+> *Definition:* t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding - a dimensionality reduction technique that preserves local structure for visualization.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Clusters in t-SNE plots indicate groups of semantically related words. Spread indicates vocabulary diversity; tight clusters suggest semantic coherence.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Meaningful clusters (e.g., numbers together, verbs together). Avoid over-interpreting distances - t-SNE preserves local, not global, structure.
+
+### General Interpretation Guidelines
+
+1. **Compare within model families:** Metrics are most meaningful when comparing models of the same type (e.g., 8k vs 64k tokenizer).
+2. **Consider trade-offs:** Better performance on one metric often comes at the cost of another (e.g., compression vs. OOV rate).
+3. **Context matters:** Optimal values depend on downstream tasks. Text generation may prioritize different metrics than classification.
+4. **Corpus influence:** All metrics are influenced by corpus characteristics. Wikipedia text differs from social media or literature.
+5. **Language-specific patterns:** Morphologically rich languages (like Arabic) may show different optimal ranges than analytic languages.
+
+
+### Visualizations Index
+
+| Visualization | Description |
+|---------------|-------------|
+| Tokenizer Compression | Compression ratios by vocabulary size |
+| Tokenizer Fertility | Average token length by vocabulary |
+| Tokenizer OOV | Unknown token rates |
+| Tokenizer Total Tokens | Total tokens by vocabulary |
+| N-gram Perplexity | Perplexity by n-gram size |
+| N-gram Entropy | Entropy by n-gram size |
+| N-gram Coverage | Top pattern coverage |
+| N-gram Unique | Unique n-gram counts |
+| Markov Entropy | Entropy by context size |
+| Markov Branching | Branching factor by context |
+| Markov Contexts | Unique context counts |
+| Zipf's Law | Frequency-rank distribution with fit |
+| Vocab Frequency | Word frequency distribution |
+| Top 20 Words | Most frequent words |
+| Vocab Coverage | Cumulative coverage curve |
+| Embedding Isotropy | Vector space uniformity |
+| Embedding Norms | Vector magnitude distribution |
+| Embedding Similarity | Word similarity heatmap |
+| Nearest Neighbors | Similar words for key terms |
+| t-SNE Words | 2D word embedding visualization |
+| t-SNE Sentences | 2D sentence embedding visualization |
+| Position Encoding | Encoding method comparison |
+| Model Sizes | Storage requirements |
+| Performance Dashboard | Comprehensive performance overview |
+
+---
+## About This Project
+
+### Data Source
+
+Models trained on [wikipedia-monthly](https://huggingface.co/datasets/omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly) - a monthly snapshot of Wikipedia articles across 300+ languages.
+
+### Project
+
+A project by **[Wikilangs](https://wikilangs.org)** - Open-source NLP models for every Wikipedia language.
+
+### Maintainer
+
+[Omar Kamali](https://omarkamali.com) - [Omneity Labs](https://omneitylabs.com)
+
+### Citation
+
+If you use these models in your research, please cite:
+
+```bibtex
+@misc{wikilangs2025,
+  author = {Kamali, Omar},
+  title = {Wikilangs: Open NLP Models for Wikipedia Languages},
+  year = {2025},
+  doi = {10.5281/zenodo.18073153},
+  publisher = {Zenodo},
+  url = {https://huggingface.co/wikilangs}
+  institution = {Omneity Labs}
+}
+```
+
+### License
+
+MIT License - Free for academic and commercial use.
+
+### Links
+
+- 🌐 Website: [wikilangs.org](https://wikilangs.org)
+- 🤗 Models: [huggingface.co/wikilangs](https://huggingface.co/wikilangs)
+- 📊 Data: [wikipedia-monthly](https://huggingface.co/datasets/omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly)
+- 👤 Author: [Omar Kamali](https://huggingface.co/omarkamali)
+- 🤝 Sponsor: [Featherless AI](https://featherless.ai)
+---
+*Generated by Wikilangs Models Pipeline*
+
+*Report Date: 2026-01-11 01:22:47*

models/embeddings/aligned/to_128d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:c2ecf0f3f8b16419ef8e9a1205e63781807279102fbcd961b44b58131973bdcd
+size 1026907452

models/embeddings/aligned/to_128d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "to", "dim": 128, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": true}

models/embeddings/aligned/to_128d.projection.npy

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:a48fd33df547ad51f734e1c1f56be3a8e827dbb63621f2d9a934594a70da5aa7
+size 65664

models/embeddings/aligned/to_128d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+{
+  "language": "to",
+  "dimension": 128,
+  "version": "aligned",
+  "hub_language": "en",
+  "seed_vocab_size": 1100,
+  "vocab_size": 2795
+}

models/embeddings/aligned/to_32d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:f9320faa0a72efacc32b0a7e3a850ff2c3ba718c347851de3c81818b0a9a2d01
+size 256760892

models/embeddings/aligned/to_32d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "to", "dim": 32, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": true}

models/embeddings/aligned/to_32d.projection.npy

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:a58ab2b29fa93f811b0f0f67702e19869497f087358cf42dd3aa36ba87046999
+size 4224

models/embeddings/aligned/to_32d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+{
+  "language": "to",
+  "dimension": 32,
+  "version": "aligned",
+  "hub_language": "en",
+  "seed_vocab_size": 1100,
+  "vocab_size": 2795
+}

models/embeddings/aligned/to_64d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:bfde4285ba245ed3b624a52406f6d75caec071410325640ea4ba6a53bb9bace2
+size 513476412

models/embeddings/aligned/to_64d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "to", "dim": 64, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": true}

models/embeddings/aligned/to_64d.projection.npy

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:571075f71efd05ece4c7764c9cd362f74a860048e2963b5a2b8b2eeaace0d265
+size 16512

models/embeddings/aligned/to_64d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+{
+  "language": "to",
+  "dimension": 64,
+  "version": "aligned",
+  "hub_language": "en",
+  "seed_vocab_size": 1100,
+  "vocab_size": 2795
+}

models/embeddings/monolingual/to_128d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:c2ecf0f3f8b16419ef8e9a1205e63781807279102fbcd961b44b58131973bdcd
+size 1026907452

models/embeddings/monolingual/to_128d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "to", "dim": 128, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": false}

models/embeddings/monolingual/to_128d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+{
+  "language": "to",
+  "dimension": 128,
+  "version": "monolingual",
+  "training_params": {
+    "algorithm": "skipgram",
+    "min_count": 5,
+    "window": 5,
+    "negative": 5,
+    "epochs": 5,
+    "encoding_method": "rope",
+    "dim": 128,
+    "threads": 5
+  },
+  "vocab_size": 2795
+}

models/embeddings/monolingual/to_32d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:f9320faa0a72efacc32b0a7e3a850ff2c3ba718c347851de3c81818b0a9a2d01
+size 256760892

models/embeddings/monolingual/to_32d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "to", "dim": 32, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": false}

models/embeddings/monolingual/to_32d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+{
+  "language": "to",
+  "dimension": 32,
+  "version": "monolingual",
+  "training_params": {
+    "algorithm": "skipgram",
+    "min_count": 5,
+    "window": 5,
+    "negative": 5,
+    "epochs": 5,
+    "encoding_method": "rope",
+    "dim": 32,
+    "threads": 5
+  },
+  "vocab_size": 2795
+}

models/embeddings/monolingual/to_64d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:bfde4285ba245ed3b624a52406f6d75caec071410325640ea4ba6a53bb9bace2
+size 513476412

models/embeddings/monolingual/to_64d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "to", "dim": 64, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": false}

models/embeddings/monolingual/to_64d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+{
+  "language": "to",
+  "dimension": 64,
+  "version": "monolingual",
+  "training_params": {
+    "algorithm": "skipgram",
+    "min_count": 5,
+    "window": 5,
+    "negative": 5,
+    "epochs": 5,
+    "encoding_method": "rope",
+    "dim": 64,
+    "threads": 5
+  },
+  "vocab_size": 2795
+}

models/subword_markov/to_markov_ctx1_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:abccbe7526d8e4c0dde21e092fcbed80446d94e92c7c7ef2ea60805ae526d775
+size 27651

models/subword_markov/to_markov_ctx1_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 1,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "to",
+  "unique_contexts": 432,
+  "total_transitions": 871491
+}

models/subword_markov/to_markov_ctx2_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:c80461d35d2111972e1a7a6805fb2eccd4eea526c557869b6d9b849617c4a993
+size 129722

models/subword_markov/to_markov_ctx2_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 2,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "to",
+  "unique_contexts": 2905,
+  "total_transitions": 869814
+}

models/subword_markov/to_markov_ctx3_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:bb642d324ec8f2765554fd647b0bb3107291c96056a216530f4a0a7080b839fc
+size 405997

models/subword_markov/to_markov_ctx3_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 3,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "to",
+  "unique_contexts": 15009,
+  "total_transitions": 868137
+}

models/subword_markov/to_markov_ctx4_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:df1599c1f7e2082f7d77749b807a1e249c636c4d76a1911ddad41b49845316e1
+size 987759

models/subword_markov/to_markov_ctx4_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 4,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "to",
+  "unique_contexts": 52648,
+  "total_transitions": 866460
+}

models/subword_ngram/to_2gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:00a7118b3b123ab19067e255f211f84e86c78d1c9cf6674d0ee34c2608741a2e
+size 18275

models/subword_ngram/to_2gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 2,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "to",
+  "unique_ngrams": 1246,
+  "total_ngrams": 871491
+}

models/subword_ngram/to_3gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:dd2de5dcc3dd47d7098fbb708eb78b22800c347eace14aef79e79a988c39e456
+size 92876

models/subword_ngram/to_3gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 3,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "to",
+  "unique_ngrams": 7944,
+  "total_ngrams": 869814
+}

models/subword_ngram/to_4gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:6eb96ab1d51291565867bc9c754c9b47d8692aaaadb57a5156057141068e5234
+size 377484

models/subword_ngram/to_4gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 4,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "to",
+  "unique_ngrams": 31079,
+  "total_ngrams": 868137
+}

models/subword_ngram/to_5gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:4c345a8f31fafea899466141ba51e19f034f979fb2ecdd09e0b0b8778d888dca
+size 697216

models/subword_ngram/to_5gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 5,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "to",
+  "unique_ngrams": 57462,
+  "total_ngrams": 866460
+}

models/tokenizer/to_tokenizer_16k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:bed6356b2e74188f4edc8dfd6d7ce370dbbf38eafde4630a1551353520d08034
+size 510693

models/tokenizer/to_tokenizer_32k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:d9c8c6dd6d922da68249a65d26a454b7d27b726c632b4be62928b639eb569a1a
+size 766721

models/tokenizer/to_tokenizer_8k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:db95dc4bbf8810c68918d40f76cc677e11998151ed68b5093c6a6e083e2a9d48
+size 372791

models/vocabulary/to_vocabulary.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:d0180288b8721074f3bea1d8c84c1ac6ffc8dfa2f0ebffacc8b96ac1b8cac617
+size 110958

models/vocabulary/to_vocabulary_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+{
+  "language": "to",
+  "vocabulary_size": 6787,
+  "variant": "full",
+  "statistics": {
+    "type_token_ratio": 0.09895434676720458,
+    "coverage": {
+      "top_100": 0.5343711847573743,
+      "top_1000": 0.7916474257194006,
+      "top_5000": 0.9213704193366775,
+      "top_10000": 0.9643035620528456
+    },
+    "hapax_count": 8856,
+    "hapax_ratio": 0.5661318161477977,
+    "total_documents": 1677
+  }
+}

models/word_markov/to_markov_ctx1_word.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:0a15619563927a0c69409566a68bd56619f9e36715bc59995bcc0a9e979d1e66
+size 512547

models/word_markov/to_markov_ctx1_word_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 1,
+  "variant": "word",
+  "language": "to",
+  "unique_contexts": 15572,
+  "total_transitions": 156406
+}

models/word_markov/to_markov_ctx2_word.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:bcc22f9feed34b9b9564b085c1e2a1e5ba9cbc0bab61d609b8c08356a6796191
+size 1149022