Upload all models and assets for uz (latest)

.gitattributes

@@ -33,3 +33,10 @@ saved_model/**/* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *.zip filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *.zst filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *tfevents* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/embedding_similarity.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/embedding_tsne_multilingual.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/performance_dashboard.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/position_encoding_comparison.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/tsne_sentences.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/tsne_words.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/zipf_law.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text

README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,773 @@
+---
+language: uz
+language_name: Uzbek
+language_family: turkic_other
+tags:
+  - wikilangs
+  - nlp
+  - tokenizer
+  - embeddings
+  - n-gram
+  - markov
+  - wikipedia
+  - feature-extraction
+  - sentence-similarity
+  - tokenization
+  - n-grams
+  - markov-chain
+  - text-mining
+  - fasttext
+  - babelvec
+  - vocabulous
+  - vocabulary
+  - monolingual
+  - family-turkic_other
+license: mit
+library_name: wikilangs
+pipeline_tag: text-generation
+datasets:
+  - omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly
+dataset_info:
+  name: wikipedia-monthly
+  description: Monthly snapshots of Wikipedia articles across 300+ languages
+metrics:
+  - name: best_compression_ratio
+    type: compression
+    value: 4.579
+  - name: best_isotropy
+    type: isotropy
+    value: 0.7694
+  - name: vocabulary_size
+    type: vocab
+    value: 0
+generated: 2026-01-11
+---
+
+# Uzbek - Wikilangs Models
+## Comprehensive Research Report & Full Ablation Study
+
+This repository contains NLP models trained and evaluated by Wikilangs, specifically on **Uzbek** Wikipedia data.
+We analyze tokenizers, n-gram models, Markov chains, vocabulary statistics, and word embeddings.
+
+## 📋 Repository Contents
+
+### Models & Assets
+
+- Tokenizers (8k, 16k, 32k, 64k)
+- N-gram models (2, 3, 4, 5-gram)
+- Markov chains (context of 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5)
+- Subword N-gram and Markov chains
+- Embeddings in various sizes and dimensions (aligned and unaligned)
+- Language Vocabulary
+- Language Statistics
+
+![Performance Dashboard](visualizations/performance_dashboard.png)
+
+### Analysis and Evaluation
+
+- [1. Tokenizer Evaluation](#1-tokenizer-evaluation)
+- [2. N-gram Model Evaluation](#2-n-gram-model-evaluation)
+- [3. Markov Chain Evaluation](#3-markov-chain-evaluation)
+- [4. Vocabulary Analysis](#4-vocabulary-analysis)
+- [5. Word Embeddings Evaluation](#5-word-embeddings-evaluation)
+- [6. Morphological Analysis (Experimental)](#6--morphological-analysis-experimental)
+- [7. Summary & Recommendations](#7-summary--recommendations)
+- [Metrics Glossary](#appendix-metrics-glossary--interpretation-guide)
+- [Visualizations Index](#visualizations-index)
+
+---
+## 1. Tokenizer Evaluation
+
+![Tokenizer Compression](visualizations/tokenizer_compression.png)
+
+![Tokenizer Fertility](visualizations/tokenizer_fertility.png)
+
+![Tokenizer OOV](visualizations/tokenizer_oov.png)
+
+![Total Tokens](visualizations/tokenizer_total_tokens.png)
+
+### Results
+
+| Vocab Size | Compression | Avg Token Len | UNK Rate | Total Tokens |
+|------------|-------------|---------------|----------|--------------|
+| **8k** | 3.671x | 3.67 | 0.0852% | 1,947,309 |
+| **16k** | 4.048x | 4.05 | 0.0940% | 1,765,944 |
+| **32k** | 4.351x | 4.35 | 0.1010% | 1,642,973 |
+| **64k** | 4.579x 🏆 | 4.58 | 0.1063% | 1,561,057 |
+
+### Tokenization Examples
+
+Below are sample sentences tokenized with each vocabulary size:
+
+**Sample 1:** `— Braziliyaning Alagoas shtatidagi munisipalitet. Manbalar munitsipalitetlari`
+
+| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
+|-------|--------|-------|
+| 8k | `▁— ▁braziliyaning ▁ala go as ▁shtatidagi ▁munisipalitet . ▁manbalar ▁munitsipalitet ... (+1 more)` | 11 |
+| 16k | `▁— ▁braziliyaning ▁ala go as ▁shtatidagi ▁munisipalitet . ▁manbalar ▁munitsipalitet ... (+1 more)` | 11 |
+| 32k | `▁— ▁braziliyaning ▁ala go as ▁shtatidagi ▁munisipalitet . ▁manbalar ▁munitsipalitet ... (+1 more)` | 11 |
+| 64k | `▁— ▁braziliyaning ▁alagoas ▁shtatidagi ▁munisipalitet . ▁manbalar ▁munitsipalitet lari` | 9 |
+
+**Sample 2:** `Boztarla — Adıyaman viloyatining Kâhta tumanidagi qishloqlardan biri. Manbalar b...`
+
+| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
+|-------|--------|-------|
+| 8k | `▁boz tar la ▁— ▁ad ı y aman ▁viloyatining ▁k ... (+14 more)` | 24 |
+| 16k | `▁boz tar la ▁— ▁adıyaman ▁viloyatining ▁k â h ta ... (+11 more)` | 21 |
+| 32k | `▁boz tar la ▁— ▁adıyaman ▁viloyatining ▁k â hta ▁tumanidagi ... (+10 more)` | 20 |
+| 64k | `▁boz tar la ▁— ▁adıyaman ▁viloyatining ▁kâhta ▁tumanidagi ▁qishloqlardan ▁biri ... (+8 more)` | 18 |
+
+**Sample 3:** `— Braziliyaning Para shtatidagi munitsipalitet. Manbalar munitsipalitetlari`
+
+| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
+|-------|--------|-------|
+| 8k | `▁— ▁braziliyaning ▁para ▁shtatidagi ▁munitsipalitet . ▁manbalar ▁munitsipalitet lari` | 9 |
+| 16k | `▁— ▁braziliyaning ▁para ▁shtatidagi ▁munitsipalitet . ▁manbalar ▁munitsipalitet lari` | 9 |
+| 32k | `▁— ▁braziliyaning ▁para ▁shtatidagi ▁munitsipalitet . ▁manbalar ▁munitsipalitet lari` | 9 |
+| 64k | `▁— ▁braziliyaning ▁para ▁shtatidagi ▁munitsipalitet . ▁manbalar ▁munitsipalitet lari` | 9 |
+
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Compression:** 64k achieves 4.579x compression
+- **Lowest UNK Rate:** 8k with 0.0852% unknown tokens
+- **Trade-off:** Larger vocabularies improve compression but increase model size
+- **Recommendation:** 32k vocabulary provides optimal balance for production use
+
+---
+## 2. N-gram Model Evaluation
+
+![N-gram Perplexity](visualizations/ngram_perplexity.png)
+
+![N-gram Unique](visualizations/ngram_unique.png)
+
+![N-gram Coverage](visualizations/ngram_coverage.png)
+
+### Results
+
+| N-gram | Variant | Perplexity | Entropy | Unique N-grams | Top-100 Coverage | Top-1000 Coverage |
+|--------|---------|------------|---------|----------------|------------------|-------------------|
+| **2-gram** | Word | 144,258 | 17.14 | 1,000,611 | 8.6% | 21.5% |
+| **2-gram** | Subword | 306 🏆 | 8.26 | 17,282 | 64.7% | 98.6% |
+| **3-gram** | Word | 209,904 | 17.68 | 1,395,449 | 10.7% | 21.4% |
+| **3-gram** | Subword | 2,739 | 11.42 | 139,644 | 25.4% | 67.7% |
+| **4-gram** | Word | 290,405 | 18.15 | 2,129,240 | 11.2% | 22.1% |
+| **4-gram** | Subword | 15,565 | 13.93 | 811,800 | 12.4% | 38.1% |
+| **5-gram** | Word | 184,509 | 17.49 | 1,485,957 | 12.3% | 25.0% |
+| **5-gram** | Subword | 58,859 | 15.84 | 2,792,057 | 7.1% | 25.1% |
+
+### Top 5 N-grams by Size
+
+**2-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `aholi punktlari` | 133,471 |
+| 2 | `boʻyicha aholi` | 102,687 |
+| 3 | `tarkibiga kiradi` | 71,231 |
+| 4 | `istiqomat qiladi` | 66,979 |
+| 5 | `aholi istiqomat` | 65,487 |
+
+**3-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `boʻyicha aholi punktlari` | 102,646 |
+| 2 | `nafar aholi istiqomat` | 64,709 |
+| 3 | `aholi istiqomat qiladi` | 62,946 |
+| 4 | `aholi punktlari shaharlari` | 55,710 |
+| 5 | `manbalar boʻyicha aholi` | 44,383 |
+
+**4-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `nafar aholi istiqomat qiladi` | 62,574 |
+| 2 | `boʻyicha aholi punktlari shaharlari` | 55,662 |
+| 3 | `manbalar boʻyicha aholi punktlari` | 44,383 |
+| 4 | `yangi umumiy katalog asl` | 32,515 |
+| 5 | `umumiy katalog asl nashrida` | 32,515 |
+
+**5-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `manbalar boʻyicha aholi punktlari shaharlari` | 33,698 |
+| 2 | `yangi umumiy katalog asl nashrida` | 32,515 |
+| 3 | `aholi zichligi har kvadrat kilometrga` | 30,929 |
+| 4 | `nafar aholi istiqomat qiladi aholi` | 30,451 |
+| 5 | `aholi istiqomat qiladi aholi zichligi` | 30,448 |
+
+**2-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `a _` | 8,473,406 |
+| 2 | `i _` | 8,057,286 |
+| 3 | `a r` | 7,652,474 |
+| 4 | `l a` | 7,619,051 |
+| 5 | `a n` | 7,333,858 |
+
+**3-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `l a r` | 4,022,470 |
+| 2 | `a n _` | 2,638,804 |
+| 3 | `d a _` | 2,516,594 |
+| 4 | `i d a` | 2,211,006 |
+| 5 | `g a n` | 2,200,072 |
+
+**4-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `n i n g` | 1,559,456 |
+| 2 | `i n g _` | 1,556,517 |
+| 3 | `l a r i` | 1,513,348 |
+| 4 | `l a r _` | 1,478,041 |
+| 5 | `i d a _` | 1,328,422 |
+
+**5-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `n i n g _` | 1,484,174 |
+| 2 | `l a r i _` | 771,549 |
+| 3 | `g a n . _` | 672,707 |
+| 4 | `d a g i _` | 557,890 |
+| 5 | `a d i . _` | 529,582 |
+
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Perplexity:** 2-gram (subword) with 306
+- **Entropy Trend:** Decreases with larger n-grams (more predictable)
+- **Coverage:** Top-1000 patterns cover ~25% of corpus
+- **Recommendation:** 4-gram or 5-gram for best predictive performance
+
+---
+## 3. Markov Chain Evaluation
+
+![Markov Entropy](visualizations/markov_entropy.png)
+
+![Markov Contexts](visualizations/markov_contexts.png)
+
+![Markov Branching](visualizations/markov_branching.png)
+
+### Results
+
+| Context | Variant | Avg Entropy | Perplexity | Branching Factor | Unique Contexts | Predictability |
+|---------|---------|-------------|------------|------------------|-----------------|----------------|
+| **1** | Word | 0.8649 | 1.821 | 9.91 | 1,734,204 | 13.5% |
+| **1** | Subword | 1.1817 | 2.268 | 7.66 | 9,225 | 0.0% |
+| **2** | Word | 0.3006 | 1.232 | 1.88 | 17,159,887 | 69.9% |
+| **2** | Subword | 0.6573 | 1.577 | 4.58 | 70,636 | 34.3% |
+| **3** | Word | 0.1029 | 1.074 | 1.20 | 32,224,146 | 89.7% |
+| **3** | Subword | 0.7355 | 1.665 | 4.35 | 323,343 | 26.4% |
+| **4** | Word | 0.0379 🏆 | 1.027 | 1.06 | 38,723,206 | 96.2% |
+| **4** | Subword | 0.7076 | 1.633 | 3.60 | 1,405,500 | 29.2% |
+
+### Generated Text Samples (Word-based)
+
+Below are text samples generated from each word-based Markov chain model:
+
+**Context Size 1:**
+
+1. `va pele vafoti muhammad stadioni 1 b neilson denyse julien près de antropología e 5 dan`
+2. `bilan jamoaviy koʻrgazmalarini oʻtkazgan faqat tana aʼzosi boʻlgan juftlik bahslarida chempion boʻlg...`
+3. `u oʻzining isteʼdodlar va viruslar qoʻzgʻatadigan yuqumli dasturlar bbc worldwide goʻzallik iffat qu...`
+
+**Context Size 2:**
+
+1. `boʻyicha aholi punktlari shaharlari shaharlar ipak yoʻli yaqinida joylashgan lawang kidul masjidi us...`
+2. `aholi punktlari shaharlari tashkil etilgan u mexanika boʻyicha mutaxassis avval amerikada keyin ahol...`
+3. `tarkibiga kiradi aholisi 779 nafarga yetadi o ni qoʻshilishi bilan stansiya ichidan uning sirtiga ch...`
+
+**Context Size 3:**
+
+1. `boʻyicha aholi punktlari shaharlari metropolitan hududlari`
+2. `nafar aholi istiqomat qiladi aholi zichligi har kvadrat kilometrga 20 7 nafar kishi geografiyasi may...`
+3. `aholi istiqomat qiladi aholi zichligi har kvadrat kilometrga 20 8 nafar kishi geografiyasi maydoni 3...`
+
+**Context Size 4:**
+
+1. `nafar aholi istiqomat qiladi geografiyasi hududi ramslaning hududi kmdir dengiz sathidan oʻrtacha m ...`
+2. `manbalar boʻyicha aholi punktlari shaharlari shaharlari shaharlar`
+3. `yangi umumiy katalog asl nashrida ngc 845 yangi umumiy katalog asl nashrida mavjud manbalar havolala...`
+
+
+### Generated Text Samples (Subword-based)
+
+Below are text samples generated from each subword-based Markov chain model:
+
+**Context Size 1:**
+
+1. `_boshatoraskeyid`
+2. `a_miladig‘rir_uc`
+3. `ini_pefartilafr_`
+
+**Context Size 2:**
+
+1. `a_younkty_fausta_`
+2. `i_1-1)_mena_oliga`
+3. `lar_si_jahayratbo`
+
+**Context Size 3:**
+
+1. `lardan,_shundan_sh`
+2. `an_edi._(_)_rivojl`
+3. `da_u_lood_(milgan_`
+
+**Context Size 4:**
+
+1. `ning_oʻrtacha_aholi`
+2. `ing_asosiyon)_stadi`
+3. `lar_va_federn_klubi`
+
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Predictability:** Context-4 (word) with 96.2% predictability
+- **Branching Factor:** Decreases with context size (more deterministic)
+- **Memory Trade-off:** Larger contexts require more storage (1,405,500 contexts)
+- **Recommendation:** Context-3 or Context-4 for text generation
+
+---
+## 4. Vocabulary Analysis
+
+![Zipf's Law](visualizations/zipf_law.png)
+
+![Top Words](visualizations/top20_words.png)
+
+![Coverage Curve](visualizations/vocab_coverage.png)
+
+### Statistics
+
+| Metric | Value |
+|--------|-------|
+| Vocabulary Size | 722,817 |
+| Total Tokens | 48,635,987 |
+| Mean Frequency | 67.29 |
+| Median Frequency | 4 |
+| Frequency Std Dev | 1990.25 |
+
+### Most Common Words
+
+| Rank | Word | Frequency |
+|------|------|-----------|
+| 1 | va | 1,184,048 |
+| 2 | bilan | 369,678 |
+| 3 | u | 280,225 |
+| 4 | manbalar | 272,147 |
+| 5 | aholi | 258,250 |
+| 6 | uchun | 237,429 |
+| 7 | joylashgan | 206,009 |
+| 8 | 1 | 194,151 |
+| 9 | boʻyicha | 181,987 |
+| 10 | boʻlgan | 170,867 |
+
+### Least Common Words (from vocabulary)
+
+| Rank | Word | Frequency |
+|------|------|-----------|
+| 1 | eversleigh | 2 |
+| 2 | bundlening | 2 |
+| 3 | thesigerning | 2 |
+| 4 | haggleton | 2 |
+| 5 | domli | 2 |
+| 6 | xatibani | 2 |
+| 7 | katakumite | 2 |
+| 8 | apistomorpha | 2 |
+| 9 | colucci | 2 |
+| 10 | guerrio | 2 |
+
+### Zipf's Law Analysis
+
+| Metric | Value |
+|--------|-------|
+| Zipf Coefficient | 1.0071 |
+| R² (Goodness of Fit) | 0.991725 |
+| Adherence Quality | **excellent** |
+
+### Coverage Analysis
+
+| Top N Words | Coverage |
+|-------------|----------|
+| Top 100 | 21.2% |
+| Top 1,000 | 48.2% |
+| Top 5,000 | 67.9% |
+| Top 10,000 | 75.6% |
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Zipf Compliance:** R²=0.9917 indicates excellent adherence to Zipf's law
+- **High Frequency Dominance:** Top 100 words cover 21.2% of corpus
+- **Long Tail:** 712,817 words needed for remaining 24.4% coverage
+
+---
+## 5. Word Embeddings Evaluation
+
+![Embedding Isotropy](visualizations/embedding_isotropy.png)
+
+![Similarity Matrix](visualizations/embedding_similarity.png)
+
+![t-SNE Words](visualizations/tsne_words.png)
+
+![t-SNE Sentences](visualizations/tsne_sentences.png)
+
+
+### 5.1 Cross-Lingual Alignment
+
+![Alignment Quality](visualizations/embedding_alignment_quality.png)
+
+![Multilingual t-SNE](visualizations/embedding_tsne_multilingual.png)
+
+
+### 5.2 Model Comparison
+
+| Model | Dimension | Isotropy | Semantic Density | Alignment R@1 | Alignment R@10 |
+|-------|-----------|----------|------------------|---------------|----------------|
+| **mono_32d** | 32 | 0.7694 🏆 | 0.3417 | N/A | N/A |
+| **mono_64d** | 64 | 0.7319 | 0.2924 | N/A | N/A |
+| **mono_128d** | 128 | 0.6469 | 0.2679 | N/A | N/A |
+| **aligned_32d** | 32 | 0.7694 | 0.3486 | 0.2540 | 0.6100 |
+| **aligned_64d** | 64 | 0.7319 | 0.3022 | 0.3600 | 0.7600 |
+| **aligned_128d** | 128 | 0.6469 | 0.2627 | 0.5040 | 0.8100 |
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Isotropy:** mono_32d with 0.7694 (more uniform distribution)
+- **Semantic Density:** Average pairwise similarity of 0.3026. Lower values indicate better semantic separation.
+- **Alignment Quality:** Aligned models achieve up to 50.4% R@1 in cross-lingual retrieval.
+- **Recommendation:** 128d aligned for best cross-lingual performance
+
+---
+## 6.  Morphological Analysis (Experimental)
+
+This section presents an automated morphological analysis derived from the statistical divergence between word-level and subword-level models. By analyzing where subword predictability spikes and where word-level coverage fails, we can infer linguistic structures without supervised data.
+
+### 6.1 Productivity & Complexity
+
+| Metric | Value | Interpretation | Recommendation |
+|--------|-------|----------------|----------------|
+| Productivity Index | **5.000** | High morphological productivity | Reliable analysis |
+| Idiomaticity Gap | **-0.006** | Low formulaic content | - |
+
+### 6.2 Affix Inventory (Productive Units)
+
+These are the most productive prefixes and suffixes identified by sampling the vocabulary for global substitutability patterns. A unit is considered an affix if stripping it leaves a valid stem that appears in other contexts.
+
+#### Productive Prefixes
+| Prefix | Examples |
+|--------|----------|
+| `-a` | aminofenollar, alimkul, ashtarxoniylardan |
+| `-s` | stolyarov, signalnaya, sovutish |
+| `-ma` | macewan, matodir, majduddin |
+| `-m` | munosabatlaridir, macewan, matodir |
+| `-k` | konseysao, kuzatuvdagi, kello |
+| `-b` | boqiya, boatengning, bacsinszky |
+| `-t` | triangulorum, tarantelloyoʻlboshlovchi, totning |
+| `-ba` | bacsinszky, barbaraʼ, baholangan |
+
+#### Productive Suffixes
+| Suffix | Examples |
+|--------|----------|
+| `-a` | signalnaya, uncda, boqiya |
+| `-i` | ruhiyati, oʻrtogʻini, semizligi |
+| `-ng` | sashaning, boatengning, garmonning |
+| `-g` | sashaning, boatengning, garmonning |
+| `-n` | gʻishtin, zararsizlantiriladigan, macewan |
+| `-an` | zararsizlantiriladigan, macewan, lushan |
+| `-ni` | oʻrtogʻini, shlezvigni, hitini |
+| `-ga` | umidga, diskiga, yupiterga |
+
+### 6.3 Bound Stems (Lexical Roots)
+
+Bound stems are high-frequency subword units that are semantically cohesive but rarely appear as standalone words. These often correspond to the 'core' of a word that requires inflection or derivation to be valid.
+
+| Stem | Cohesion | Substitutability | Examples |
+|------|----------|------------------|----------|
+| `rnin` | 2.47x | 350 contexts | rnini, rning, barnin |
+| `inin` | 2.05x | 623 contexts | minin, inini, zinin |
+| `anin` | 1.72x | 759 contexts | ganin, yanin, manin |
+| `oʻlg` | 2.47x | 58 contexts | koʻlga, qoʻlga, oʻlgan |
+| `ʻlga` | 2.36x | 68 contexts | koʻlga, qoʻlga, oʻlgan |
+| `idag` | 1.82x | 211 contexts | idagi, idaga, ridagi |
+| `hlar` | 1.64x | 291 contexts | shlar, ihlar, shlari |
+| `manb` | 2.30x | 44 contexts | manba, manbam, 3manba |
+| `hgan` | 1.83x | 113 contexts | shgan, chgan, shgani |
+| `nbal` | 2.39x | 35 contexts | inbal, manbal, nbalar |
+| `ilad` | 1.59x | 198 contexts | gilad, iladi, bilad |
+| `oyla` | 1.80x | 101 contexts | joyla, oylar, koyla |
+
+### 6.4 Affix Compatibility (Co-occurrence)
+
+This table shows which prefixes and suffixes most frequently co-occur on the same stems, revealing the 'stacking' rules of the language's morphology.
+
+| Prefix | Suffix | Frequency | Examples |
+|--------|--------|-----------|----------|
+| `-s` | `-a` | 145 words | semiusta, sammitlarda |
+| `-t` | `-a` | 115 words | tritonda, torgovlya |
+| `-k` | `-a` | 105 words | konka, kalva |
+| `-b` | `-a` | 100 words | beldumgʻaza, ballantiophora |
+| `-s` | `-i` | 100 words | samkni, stantsiyalaridagi |
+| `-k` | `-i` | 97 words | karetkasi, kriminalistikasi |
+| `-a` | `-a` | 97 words | akvabogʻda, ahvazga |
+| `-t` | `-i` | 96 words | tayinlandiyangi, tayinlamadi |
+| `-s` | `-n` | 85 words | shohmuroddan, slain |
+| `-b` | `-i` | 84 words | bukowski, butasi |
+
+### 6.5 Recursive Morpheme Segmentation
+
+Using **Recursive Hierarchical Substitutability**, we decompose complex words into their constituent morphemes. This approach handles nested affixes (e.g., `prefix-prefix-root-suffix`).
+
+| Word | Suggested Split | Confidence | Stem |
+|------|-----------------|------------|------|
+| spidometriga | **`spidometr-i-ga`** | 7.5 | `i` |
+| synesthesia | **`synesthes-i-a`** | 7.5 | `i` |
+| kavaleriyada | **`kavaleriy-a-da`** | 7.5 | `a` |
+| tesaliyadagi | **`tesaliya-da-gi`** | 7.5 | `da` |
+| dogʻistondagi | **`dogʻiston-da-gi`** | 7.5 | `da` |
+| oilalarda | **`oilal-ar-da`** | 7.5 | `ar` |
+| kamroqdir | **`kamroqd-i-r`** | 7.5 | `i` |
+| anguilladagi | **`anguilla-da-gi`** | 7.5 | `da` |
+| qashgʻariya | **`qashgʻar-i-ya`** | 7.5 | `i` |
+| aggressiv | **`aggress-i-v`** | 7.5 | `i` |
+| oshirishlariga | **`oshirishlar-i-ga`** | 7.5 | `i` |
+| hempcrete | **`hempcre-t-e`** | 7.5 | `t` |
+| misolidir | **`misolid-i-r`** | 7.5 | `i` |
+| oʻzgarishlarini | **`oʻzgarishlar-i-ni`** | 7.5 | `i` |
+| raqobatchini | **`raqobatch-i-ni`** | 7.5 | `i` |
+
+### 6.6 Linguistic Interpretation
+
+> **Automated Insight:**
+The language Uzbek shows high morphological productivity. The subword models are significantly more efficient than word models, suggesting a rich system of affixation or compounding.
+
+---
+## 7. Summary & Recommendations
+
+![Performance Dashboard](visualizations/performance_dashboard.png)
+
+### Production Recommendations
+
+| Component | Recommended | Rationale |
+|-----------|-------------|-----------|
+| Tokenizer | **64k BPE** | Best compression (4.58x) |
+| N-gram | **2-gram** | Lowest perplexity (306) |
+| Markov | **Context-4** | Highest predictability (96.2%) |
+| Embeddings | **100d** | Balanced semantic capture and isotropy |
+
+
+---
+## Appendix: Metrics Glossary & Interpretation Guide
+
+This section provides definitions, intuitions, and guidance for interpreting the metrics used throughout this report.
+
+### Tokenizer Metrics
+
+**Compression Ratio**
+> *Definition:* The ratio of characters to tokens (chars/token). Measures how efficiently the tokenizer represents text.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Higher compression means fewer tokens needed to represent the same text, reducing sequence lengths for downstream models. A 3x compression means ~3 characters per token on average.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Higher is generally better for efficiency, but extremely high compression may indicate overly aggressive merging that loses morphological information.
+
+**Average Token Length (Fertility)**
+> *Definition:* Mean number of characters per token produced by the tokenizer.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Reflects the granularity of tokenization. Longer tokens capture more context but may struggle with rare words; shorter tokens are more flexible but increase sequence length.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Balance between 2-5 characters for most languages. Arabic/morphologically-rich languages may benefit from slightly longer tokens.
+
+**Unknown Token Rate (OOV Rate)**
+> *Definition:* Percentage of tokens that map to the unknown/UNK token, indicating words the tokenizer cannot represent.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Lower OOV means better vocabulary coverage. High OOV indicates the tokenizer encounters many unseen character sequences.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Below 1% is excellent; below 5% is acceptable. BPE tokenizers typically achieve very low OOV due to subword fallback.
+
+### N-gram Model Metrics
+
+**Perplexity**
+> *Definition:* Measures how "surprised" the model is by test data. Mathematically: 2^(cross-entropy). Lower values indicate better prediction.
+>
+> *Intuition:* If perplexity is 100, the model is as uncertain as if choosing uniformly among 100 options at each step. A perplexity of 10 means effectively choosing among 10 equally likely options.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Lower is better. Perplexity decreases with larger n-grams (more context). Values vary widely by language and corpus size.
+
+**Entropy**
+> *Definition:* Average information content (in bits) needed to encode the next token given the context. Related to perplexity: perplexity = 2^entropy.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High entropy means high uncertainty/randomness; low entropy means predictable patterns. Natural language typically has entropy between 1-4 bits per character.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Lower entropy indicates more predictable text patterns. Entropy should decrease as n-gram size increases.
+
+**Coverage (Top-K)**
+> *Definition:* Percentage of corpus occurrences explained by the top K most frequent n-grams.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High coverage with few patterns indicates repetitive/formulaic text; low coverage suggests diverse vocabulary usage.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Depends on use case. For language modeling, moderate coverage (40-60% with top-1000) is typical for natural text.
+
+### Markov Chain Metrics
+
+**Average Entropy**
+> *Definition:* Mean entropy across all contexts, measuring average uncertainty in next-word prediction.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Lower entropy means the model is more confident about what comes next. Context-1 has high entropy (many possible next words); Context-4 has low entropy (few likely continuations).
+>
+> *What to seek:* Decreasing entropy with larger context sizes. Very low entropy (<0.1) indicates highly deterministic transitions.
+
+**Branching Factor**
+> *Definition:* Average number of unique next tokens observed for each context.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High branching = many possible continuations (flexible but uncertain); low branching = few options (predictable but potentially repetitive).
+>
+> *What to seek:* Branching factor should decrease with context size. Values near 1.0 indicate nearly deterministic chains.
+
+**Predictability**
+> *Definition:* Derived metric: (1 - normalized_entropy) × 100%. Indicates how deterministic the model's predictions are.
+>
+> *Intuition:* 100% predictability means the next word is always certain; 0% means completely random. Real text falls between these extremes.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Higher predictability for text generation quality, but too high (>98%) may produce repetitive output.
+
+### Vocabulary & Zipf's Law Metrics
+
+**Zipf's Coefficient**
+> *Definition:* The slope of the log-log plot of word frequency vs. rank. Zipf's law predicts this should be approximately -1.
+>
+> *Intuition:* A coefficient near -1 indicates the corpus follows natural language patterns where a few words are very common and most words are rare.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Values between -0.8 and -1.2 indicate healthy natural language distribution. Deviations may suggest domain-specific or artificial text.
+
+**R² (Coefficient of Determination)**
+> *Definition:* Measures how well the linear fit explains the frequency-rank relationship. Ranges from 0 to 1.
+>
+> *Intuition:* R² near 1.0 means the data closely follows Zipf's law; lower values indicate deviation from expected word frequency patterns.
+>
+> *What to seek:* R² > 0.95 is excellent; > 0.99 indicates near-perfect Zipf adherence typical of large natural corpora.
+
+**Vocabulary Coverage**
+> *Definition:* Cumulative percentage of corpus tokens accounted for by the top N words.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Shows how concentrated word usage is. If top-100 words cover 50% of text, the corpus relies heavily on common words.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Top-100 covering 30-50% is typical. Higher coverage indicates more repetitive text; lower suggests richer vocabulary.
+
+### Word Embedding Metrics
+
+**Isotropy**
+> *Definition:* Measures how uniformly distributed vectors are in the embedding space. Computed as the ratio of minimum to maximum singular values.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High isotropy (near 1.0) means vectors spread evenly in all directions; low isotropy means vectors cluster in certain directions, reducing expressiveness.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Higher isotropy generally indicates better-quality embeddings. Values > 0.1 are reasonable; > 0.3 is good. Lower-dimensional embeddings tend to have higher isotropy.
+
+**Average Norm**
+> *Definition:* Mean magnitude (L2 norm) of word vectors in the embedding space.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Indicates the typical "length" of vectors. Consistent norms suggest stable training; high variance may indicate some words are undertrained.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Relatively consistent norms across models. The absolute value matters less than consistency (low std deviation).
+
+**Cosine Similarity**
+> *Definition:* Measures angular similarity between vectors, ranging from -1 (opposite) to 1 (identical direction).
+>
+> *Intuition:* Words with similar meanings should have high cosine similarity. This is the standard metric for semantic relatedness in embeddings.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Semantically related words should score > 0.5; unrelated words should be near 0. Synonyms often score > 0.7.
+
+**t-SNE Visualization**
+> *Definition:* t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding - a dimensionality reduction technique that preserves local structure for visualization.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Clusters in t-SNE plots indicate groups of semantically related words. Spread indicates vocabulary diversity; tight clusters suggest semantic coherence.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Meaningful clusters (e.g., numbers together, verbs together). Avoid over-interpreting distances - t-SNE preserves local, not global, structure.
+
+### General Interpretation Guidelines
+
+1. **Compare within model families:** Metrics are most meaningful when comparing models of the same type (e.g., 8k vs 64k tokenizer).
+2. **Consider trade-offs:** Better performance on one metric often comes at the cost of another (e.g., compression vs. OOV rate).
+3. **Context matters:** Optimal values depend on downstream tasks. Text generation may prioritize different metrics than classification.
+4. **Corpus influence:** All metrics are influenced by corpus characteristics. Wikipedia text differs from social media or literature.
+5. **Language-specific patterns:** Morphologically rich languages (like Arabic) may show different optimal ranges than analytic languages.
+
+
+### Visualizations Index
+
+| Visualization | Description |
+|---------------|-------------|
+| Tokenizer Compression | Compression ratios by vocabulary size |
+| Tokenizer Fertility | Average token length by vocabulary |
+| Tokenizer OOV | Unknown token rates |
+| Tokenizer Total Tokens | Total tokens by vocabulary |
+| N-gram Perplexity | Perplexity by n-gram size |
+| N-gram Entropy | Entropy by n-gram size |
+| N-gram Coverage | Top pattern coverage |
+| N-gram Unique | Unique n-gram counts |
+| Markov Entropy | Entropy by context size |
+| Markov Branching | Branching factor by context |
+| Markov Contexts | Unique context counts |
+| Zipf's Law | Frequency-rank distribution with fit |
+| Vocab Frequency | Word frequency distribution |
+| Top 20 Words | Most frequent words |
+| Vocab Coverage | Cumulative coverage curve |
+| Embedding Isotropy | Vector space uniformity |
+| Embedding Norms | Vector magnitude distribution |
+| Embedding Similarity | Word similarity heatmap |
+| Nearest Neighbors | Similar words for key terms |
+| t-SNE Words | 2D word embedding visualization |
+| t-SNE Sentences | 2D sentence embedding visualization |
+| Position Encoding | Encoding method comparison |
+| Model Sizes | Storage requirements |
+| Performance Dashboard | Comprehensive performance overview |
+
+---
+## About This Project
+
+### Data Source
+
+Models trained on [wikipedia-monthly](https://huggingface.co/datasets/omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly) - a monthly snapshot of Wikipedia articles across 300+ languages.
+
+### Project
+
+A project by **[Wikilangs](https://wikilangs.org)** - Open-source NLP models for every Wikipedia language.
+
+### Maintainer
+
+[Omar Kamali](https://omarkamali.com) - [Omneity Labs](https://omneitylabs.com)
+
+### Citation
+
+If you use these models in your research, please cite:
+
+```bibtex
+@misc{wikilangs2025,
+  author = {Kamali, Omar},
+  title = {Wikilangs: Open NLP Models for Wikipedia Languages},
+  year = {2025},
+  doi = {10.5281/zenodo.18073153},
+  publisher = {Zenodo},
+  url = {https://huggingface.co/wikilangs}
+  institution = {Omneity Labs}
+}
+```
+
+### License
+
+MIT License - Free for academic and commercial use.
+
+### Links
+
+- 🌐 Website: [wikilangs.org](https://wikilangs.org)
+- 🤗 Models: [huggingface.co/wikilangs](https://huggingface.co/wikilangs)
+- 📊 Data: [wikipedia-monthly](https://huggingface.co/datasets/omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly)
+- 👤 Author: [Omar Kamali](https://huggingface.co/omarkamali)
+- 🤝 Sponsor: [Featherless AI](https://featherless.ai)
+---
+*Generated by Wikilangs Models Pipeline*
+
+*Report Date: 2026-01-11 07:14:31*

models/embeddings/aligned/uz_128d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:80c201c4d3e79367d0e17bd27d8938508fb8d771b1782291ce7eeee9cc67f508
+size 1480837528

models/embeddings/aligned/uz_128d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "uz", "dim": 128, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": true}

models/embeddings/aligned/uz_128d.projection.npy

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:de8acf5d6f385fd6089f63d1036464bcab4d9780d5f946b47db8f497800c1813
+size 65664

models/embeddings/aligned/uz_128d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+{
+  "language": "uz",
+  "dimension": 128,
+  "version": "aligned",
+  "hub_language": "en",
+  "seed_vocab_size": 97563,
+  "vocab_size": 438093
+}

models/embeddings/aligned/uz_32d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:2cfdf39b4c5114810b084936f3da23fa61cc11f34969a0d5f35e318ca24d77c3
+size 376382104

models/embeddings/aligned/uz_32d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "uz", "dim": 32, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": true}

models/embeddings/aligned/uz_32d.projection.npy

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:d028aa78ba196ae0698342c94f8a61f44cb4211e23bd85205a8056f860596283
+size 4224

models/embeddings/aligned/uz_32d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+{
+  "language": "uz",
+  "dimension": 32,
+  "version": "aligned",
+  "hub_language": "en",
+  "seed_vocab_size": 97563,
+  "vocab_size": 438093
+}

models/embeddings/aligned/uz_64d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:996f780b2dfc86fae71b2801fcfb4a7a2a16dff846f96363ffd2dfbafee860aa
+size 744533912

models/embeddings/aligned/uz_64d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "uz", "dim": 64, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": true}

models/embeddings/aligned/uz_64d.projection.npy

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:9bba55a54101d5764627056dc38de50a2f2c039cba173fca61be90b9a3aca444
+size 16512

models/embeddings/aligned/uz_64d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+{
+  "language": "uz",
+  "dimension": 64,
+  "version": "aligned",
+  "hub_language": "en",
+  "seed_vocab_size": 97563,
+  "vocab_size": 438093
+}

models/embeddings/monolingual/uz_128d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:80c201c4d3e79367d0e17bd27d8938508fb8d771b1782291ce7eeee9cc67f508
+size 1480837528

models/embeddings/monolingual/uz_128d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "uz", "dim": 128, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": false}

models/embeddings/monolingual/uz_128d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+{
+  "language": "uz",
+  "dimension": 128,
+  "version": "monolingual",
+  "training_params": {
+    "algorithm": "skipgram",
+    "min_count": 5,
+    "window": 5,
+    "negative": 5,
+    "epochs": 5,
+    "encoding_method": "rope",
+    "dim": 128,
+    "threads": 5
+  },
+  "vocab_size": 438093
+}

models/embeddings/monolingual/uz_32d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:2cfdf39b4c5114810b084936f3da23fa61cc11f34969a0d5f35e318ca24d77c3
+size 376382104

models/embeddings/monolingual/uz_32d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "uz", "dim": 32, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": false}

models/embeddings/monolingual/uz_32d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+{
+  "language": "uz",
+  "dimension": 32,
+  "version": "monolingual",
+  "training_params": {
+    "algorithm": "skipgram",
+    "min_count": 5,
+    "window": 5,
+    "negative": 5,
+    "epochs": 5,
+    "encoding_method": "rope",
+    "dim": 32,
+    "threads": 5
+  },
+  "vocab_size": 438093
+}

models/embeddings/monolingual/uz_64d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:996f780b2dfc86fae71b2801fcfb4a7a2a16dff846f96363ffd2dfbafee860aa
+size 744533912

models/embeddings/monolingual/uz_64d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "uz", "dim": 64, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": false}

models/embeddings/monolingual/uz_64d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+{
+  "language": "uz",
+  "dimension": 64,
+  "version": "monolingual",
+  "training_params": {
+    "algorithm": "skipgram",
+    "min_count": 5,
+    "window": 5,
+    "negative": 5,
+    "epochs": 5,
+    "encoding_method": "rope",
+    "dim": 64,
+    "threads": 5
+  },
+  "vocab_size": 438093
+}

models/subword_markov/uz_markov_ctx1_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:924de6bc45b91609957e9ce0c59867aa66bb18787c6211073c11cd523b2d3e2b
+size 495042

models/subword_markov/uz_markov_ctx1_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 1,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "uz",
+  "unique_contexts": 9225,
+  "total_transitions": 386222080
+}

models/subword_markov/uz_markov_ctx2_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:9dcdc14af5bd744e2ac78b75f6bb8a29bb4f2fce4b14d915ca80a277d257b3a3
+size 2725325

models/subword_markov/uz_markov_ctx2_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 2,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "uz",
+  "unique_contexts": 70636,
+  "total_transitions": 385905804
+}

models/subword_markov/uz_markov_ctx3_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:9604f6cc6d6f0768bb27404a775b2f4b6cce35a0384552a5958d891b0623e306
+size 11715957

models/subword_markov/uz_markov_ctx3_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 3,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "uz",
+  "unique_contexts": 323343,
+  "total_transitions": 385589528
+}

models/subword_markov/uz_markov_ctx4_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:013eb61e873a8d399bd821bf4586da24645abb7abf9bc4b3cb6deb01ef5d1bca
+size 40923702

models/subword_markov/uz_markov_ctx4_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 4,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "uz",
+  "unique_contexts": 1405500,
+  "total_transitions": 385273252
+}

models/subword_ngram/uz_2gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:da8289aafbf16e6f77dbc9be0b4471b69802cff0ee7dcf0840f6420647a80ac0
+size 240233

models/subword_ngram/uz_2gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 2,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "uz",
+  "unique_ngrams": 17282,
+  "total_ngrams": 386222080
+}

models/subword_ngram/uz_3gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:3d980acd3d8d74c495369ada69035f988d95cc506f811a09145b1812231cf34f
+size 1735626

models/subword_ngram/uz_3gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 3,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "uz",
+  "unique_ngrams": 139644,
+  "total_ngrams": 385905804
+}

models/subword_ngram/uz_4gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:a0f71513029ce74190316321a1be102f1fd2ba315d39d23dc3826470cd4f67ff
+size 9696350

models/subword_ngram/uz_4gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 4,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "uz",
+  "unique_ngrams": 811800,
+  "total_ngrams": 385589528
+}

models/subword_ngram/uz_5gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:3bc73f9f93bba49e5ac3fe7bcf3dfcd773ba07a4fad0c6b3971e754aafc21922
+size 33898410

models/subword_ngram/uz_5gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 5,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "uz",
+  "unique_ngrams": 2792057,
+  "total_ngrams": 385273252
+}

models/tokenizer/uz_tokenizer_16k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:313477f7bcf9a1f9bf47c8f09241a84aba8f2e0127554ce9ab06502d76950417
+size 511070

models/tokenizer/uz_tokenizer_32k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:47444d8e667dfd73cebb5d7b53a1f104de2313bec157ad11e61256986df8a7d2
+size 793353

models/tokenizer/uz_tokenizer_64k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:5881e26501227f0a581b549a22b3cc2e0740f5e506dc512f520c397fea2ad2b1
+size 1370864

models/tokenizer/uz_tokenizer_8k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:657105b415d9bc819fc2ed5c893031e88ef06c2607a4cfaef06238c18961d5d7
+size 373870

models/vocabulary/uz_vocabulary.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:7e331b8ff393a28dc7cae668f92204e9b35940de0bc91985f22cd82e98e2cb41
+size 10823120

models/vocabulary/uz_vocabulary_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+{
+  "language": "uz",
+  "vocabulary_size": 722817,
+  "variant": "full",
+  "statistics": {
+    "type_token_ratio": 0.03494362608741173,
+    "coverage": {
+      "top_100": 0.20809780798453467,
+      "top_1000": 0.4722172891653979,
+      "top_5000": 0.665287478644933,
+      "top_10000": 0.7407095299386665
+    },
+    "hapax_count": 1012066,
+    "hapax_ratio": 0.5833626820944121,
+    "total_documents": 316276
+  }
+}

models/word_markov/uz_markov_ctx1_word.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:d0fa9408db9e3266ab06ea4a7f2e4e792ccacde29e39d8d1293525e378de9425
+size 157990120