Upload all models and assets for vo (latest)

.gitattributes

@@ -33,3 +33,9 @@ saved_model/**/* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *.zip filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *.zst filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *tfevents* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/embedding_similarity.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/embedding_tsne_multilingual.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/performance_dashboard.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/position_encoding_comparison.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/tsne_sentences.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/tsne_words.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text

README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,773 @@
+---
+language: vo
+language_name: Volapük
+language_family: constructed_auxlang
+tags:
+  - wikilangs
+  - nlp
+  - tokenizer
+  - embeddings
+  - n-gram
+  - markov
+  - wikipedia
+  - feature-extraction
+  - sentence-similarity
+  - tokenization
+  - n-grams
+  - markov-chain
+  - text-mining
+  - fasttext
+  - babelvec
+  - vocabulous
+  - vocabulary
+  - monolingual
+  - family-constructed_auxlang
+license: mit
+library_name: wikilangs
+pipeline_tag: text-generation
+datasets:
+  - omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly
+dataset_info:
+  name: wikipedia-monthly
+  description: Monthly snapshots of Wikipedia articles across 300+ languages
+metrics:
+  - name: best_compression_ratio
+    type: compression
+    value: 3.916
+  - name: best_isotropy
+    type: isotropy
+    value: 0.7749
+  - name: vocabulary_size
+    type: vocab
+    value: 0
+generated: 2026-01-11
+---
+
+# Volapük - Wikilangs Models
+## Comprehensive Research Report & Full Ablation Study
+
+This repository contains NLP models trained and evaluated by Wikilangs, specifically on **Volapük** Wikipedia data.
+We analyze tokenizers, n-gram models, Markov chains, vocabulary statistics, and word embeddings.
+
+## 📋 Repository Contents
+
+### Models & Assets
+
+- Tokenizers (8k, 16k, 32k, 64k)
+- N-gram models (2, 3, 4, 5-gram)
+- Markov chains (context of 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5)
+- Subword N-gram and Markov chains
+- Embeddings in various sizes and dimensions (aligned and unaligned)
+- Language Vocabulary
+- Language Statistics
+
+![Performance Dashboard](visualizations/performance_dashboard.png)
+
+### Analysis and Evaluation
+
+- [1. Tokenizer Evaluation](#1-tokenizer-evaluation)
+- [2. N-gram Model Evaluation](#2-n-gram-model-evaluation)
+- [3. Markov Chain Evaluation](#3-markov-chain-evaluation)
+- [4. Vocabulary Analysis](#4-vocabulary-analysis)
+- [5. Word Embeddings Evaluation](#5-word-embeddings-evaluation)
+- [6. Morphological Analysis (Experimental)](#6--morphological-analysis-experimental)
+- [7. Summary & Recommendations](#7-summary--recommendations)
+- [Metrics Glossary](#appendix-metrics-glossary--interpretation-guide)
+- [Visualizations Index](#visualizations-index)
+
+---
+## 1. Tokenizer Evaluation
+
+![Tokenizer Compression](visualizations/tokenizer_compression.png)
+
+![Tokenizer Fertility](visualizations/tokenizer_fertility.png)
+
+![Tokenizer OOV](visualizations/tokenizer_oov.png)
+
+![Total Tokens](visualizations/tokenizer_total_tokens.png)
+
+### Results
+
+| Vocab Size | Compression | Avg Token Len | UNK Rate | Total Tokens |
+|------------|-------------|---------------|----------|--------------|
+| **8k** | 3.197x | 3.20 | 0.5032% | 180,830 |
+| **16k** | 3.471x | 3.48 | 0.5464% | 166,556 |
+| **32k** | 3.716x | 3.72 | 0.5850% | 155,556 |
+| **64k** | 3.916x 🏆 | 3.92 | 0.6164% | 147,631 |
+
+### Tokenization Examples
+
+Below are sample sentences tokenized with each vocabulary size:
+
+**Sample 1:** `Hjo (Svedänapük: ) binon zifil in Götaläniän Vesüdik. Hjo labon belödanis 6 203 ...`
+
+| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
+|-------|--------|-------|
+| 8k | `▁h jo ▁( svedänapük : ▁) ▁binon ▁zifil ▁in ▁göt ... (+16 more)` | 26 |
+| 16k | `▁h jo ▁( svedänapük : ▁) ▁binon ▁zifil ▁in ▁götaläniän ... (+14 more)` | 24 |
+| 32k | `▁h jo ▁( svedänapük : ▁) ▁binon ▁zifil ▁in ▁götaläniän ... (+14 more)` | 24 |
+| 64k | `▁hjo ▁( svedänapük : ▁) ▁binon ▁zifil ▁in ▁götaläniän ▁vesüdik ... (+12 more)` | 22 |
+
+**Sample 2:** `Hiel Ishmael Larry "Ish" Smith yulul 5, Charlotte) binom bäsetaglöpädan Lamerikä...`
+
+| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
+|-------|--------|-------|
+| 8k | `▁hiel ▁is h ma el ▁larry ▁" ish " ▁smith ... (+12 more)` | 22 |
+| 16k | `▁hiel ▁is h ma el ▁larry ▁" ish " ▁smith ... (+12 more)` | 22 |
+| 32k | `▁hiel ▁ish ma el ▁larry ▁" ish " ▁smith ▁yulul ... (+11 more)` | 21 |
+| 64k | `▁hiel ▁ish ma el ▁larry ▁" ish " ▁smith ▁yulul ... (+11 more)` | 21 |
+
+**Sample 3:** `Dabinons: Włodzimierz Nowak (* hidramatan Polänik. Włodzimierz Nowak (* higasedi...`
+
+| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
+|-------|--------|-------|
+| 8k | `▁dabinons : ▁włodzimierz ▁nowak ▁(* ▁hidramatan ▁polänik . ▁włodzimierz ▁nowak ... (+7 more)` | 17 |
+| 16k | `▁dabinons : ▁włodzimierz ▁nowak ▁(* ▁hidramatan ▁polänik . ▁włodzimierz ▁nowak ... (+6 more)` | 16 |
+| 32k | `▁dabinons : ▁włodzimierz ▁nowak ▁(* ▁hidramatan ▁polänik . ▁włodzimierz ▁nowak ... (+6 more)` | 16 |
+| 64k | `▁dabinons : ▁włodzimierz ▁nowak ▁(* ▁hidramatan ▁polänik . ▁włodzimierz ▁nowak ... (+4 more)` | 14 |
+
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Compression:** 64k achieves 3.916x compression
+- **Lowest UNK Rate:** 8k with 0.5032% unknown tokens
+- **Trade-off:** Larger vocabularies improve compression but increase model size
+- **Recommendation:** 32k vocabulary provides optimal balance for production use
+
+---
+## 2. N-gram Model Evaluation
+
+![N-gram Perplexity](visualizations/ngram_perplexity.png)
+
+![N-gram Unique](visualizations/ngram_unique.png)
+
+![N-gram Coverage](visualizations/ngram_coverage.png)
+
+### Results
+
+| N-gram | Variant | Perplexity | Entropy | Unique N-grams | Top-100 Coverage | Top-1000 Coverage |
+|--------|---------|------------|---------|----------------|------------------|-------------------|
+| **2-gram** | Word | 3,125 | 11.61 | 37,618 | 29.8% | 66.2% |
+| **2-gram** | Subword | 347 🏆 | 8.44 | 4,542 | 59.6% | 99.0% |
+| **3-gram** | Word | 7,395 | 12.85 | 80,785 | 22.5% | 54.1% |
+| **3-gram** | Subword | 2,243 | 11.13 | 32,775 | 27.3% | 72.0% |
+| **4-gram** | Word | 16,716 | 14.03 | 164,670 | 20.7% | 43.5% |
+| **4-gram** | Subword | 7,575 | 12.89 | 160,036 | 18.5% | 53.4% |
+| **5-gram** | Word | 20,422 | 14.32 | 152,322 | 20.8% | 39.9% |
+| **5-gram** | Subword | 15,916 | 13.96 | 420,224 | 14.7% | 46.0% |
+
+### Top 5 N-grams by Size
+
+**2-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `zif in` | 23,665 |
+| 2 | `yüms plödik` | 20,232 |
+| 3 | `pö el` | 19,080 |
+| 4 | `in linglänapük` | 18,675 |
+| 5 | `äbinon mö` | 17,793 |
+
+**3-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `binon zif in` | 14,995 |
+| 2 | `n e lunetü` | 11,419 |
+| 3 | `65 u plu` | 10,594 |
+| 4 | `u plu 65` | 10,594 |
+| 5 | `äbinon mö us` | 10,519 |
+
+**4-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `65 u plu 65` | 10,594 |
+| 2 | `yüms plödik pö el` | 9,488 |
+| 3 | `18 u läs 18` | 7,047 |
+| 4 | `bäldotü lifayels 18 u` | 7,044 |
+| 5 | `in linglänapük pö el` | 6,055 |
+
+**5-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `pö el imdb in linglänapük` | 3,910 |
+| 2 | `lödanef timü pöpinumam yela mens` | 3,571 |
+| 3 | `ma el u s census` | 3,565 |
+| 4 | `el u s census bureau` | 3,565 |
+| 5 | `s census bureau pöpinumamabür lamerikänik` | 3,565 |
+
+**2-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `n _` | 464,689 |
+| 2 | `i n` | 404,578 |
+| 3 | `s _` | 337,545 |
+| 4 | `_ l` | 283,077 |
+| 5 | `a n` | 277,466 |
+
+**3-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `i n _` | 179,997 |
+| 2 | `_ i n` | 147,153 |
+| 3 | `b i n` | 130,072 |
+| 4 | `i n o` | 118,929 |
+| 5 | `n s _` | 112,426 |
+
+**4-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `_ i n _` | 143,998 |
+| 2 | `b i n o` | 114,754 |
+| 3 | `ä n i k` | 86,347 |
+| 4 | `i n o n` | 80,373 |
+| 5 | `ä b i n` | 61,595 |
+
+**5-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `b i n o n` | 80,174 |
+| 2 | `_ ä b i n` | 61,576 |
+| 3 | `i n o n _` | 55,167 |
+| 4 | `ä b i n o` | 50,901 |
+| 5 | `_ b i n o` | 46,130 |
+
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Perplexity:** 2-gram (subword) with 347
+- **Entropy Trend:** Decreases with larger n-grams (more predictable)
+- **Coverage:** Top-1000 patterns cover ~46% of corpus
+- **Recommendation:** 4-gram or 5-gram for best predictive performance
+
+---
+## 3. Markov Chain Evaluation
+
+![Markov Entropy](visualizations/markov_entropy.png)
+
+![Markov Contexts](visualizations/markov_contexts.png)
+
+![Markov Branching](visualizations/markov_branching.png)
+
+### Results
+
+| Context | Variant | Avg Entropy | Perplexity | Branching Factor | Unique Contexts | Predictability |
+|---------|---------|-------------|------------|------------------|-----------------|----------------|
+| **1** | Word | 0.8517 | 1.805 | 4.90 | 117,661 | 14.8% |
+| **1** | Subword | 0.8843 | 1.846 | 6.38 | 1,924 | 11.6% |
+| **2** | Word | 0.2726 | 1.208 | 1.74 | 575,135 | 72.7% |
+| **2** | Subword | 0.8560 | 1.810 | 5.21 | 12,269 | 14.4% |
+| **3** | Word | 0.1218 | 1.088 | 1.32 | 997,030 | 87.8% |
+| **3** | Subword | 0.7807 | 1.718 | 4.00 | 63,875 | 21.9% |
+| **4** | Word | 0.0717 🏆 | 1.051 | 1.19 | 1,309,197 | 92.8% |
+| **4** | Subword | 0.6693 | 1.590 | 2.90 | 255,568 | 33.1% |
+
+### Generated Text Samples (Word-based)
+
+Below are text samples generated from each word-based Markov chain model:
+
+**Context Size 1:**
+
+1. `in tallinn äbinom spotavabistiran suomiyänik yüms plödik pö el biographical directory of canada in d...`
+2. `e blägans 27 4 s konlets far out life a b dönu päpübon ün as wally`
+3. `ün ün el firstcycling in vesüda siyop fed ela são paulo in komot berkshire in deutänapük`
+
+**Context Size 2:**
+
+1. `zif in tat north carolina binof kanitan lindäna seänuänik pm ün zäladels 2`
+2. `yüms plödik calan resodatoped szalánta google maps in macarän sürfat ela simaxis binon mö 19 89 km`
+3. `pö el internet broadway database in linglänapük pö el imdb in linglänapük pö el tnb in rumänapük`
+
+**Context Size 3:**
+
+1. `binon zif in komot scotts bluff in tat nebraska in lamerikän nüns taledavik riverside topon videtü 3...`
+2. `n e lunetü 9 43 l sürfat ela terzigno binon mö 23 18 km loria labon belödanis 8`
+3. `65 u plu 65 ädabinons zänedo pösods 2 29 a lomanef e pösods 2 95 a famül demü`
+
+**Context Size 4:**
+
+1. `65 u plu 65 ädabinons zänedo pösods 2 87 a famül demü bäldot 19 2 lödanas ela weirton älabons`
+2. `yüms plödik pö el olympedia in linglänapük pö el filmportal de in deutänapük ün deutänik deutänik de...`
+3. `18 u läs 18 in lödöp älödölis 71 3 äbinons matans äkobolödöl 8 7 pädugons fa vom nen himatan`
+
+
+### Generated Text Samples (Subword-based)
+
+Below are text samples generated from each subword-based Markov chain model:
+
+**Context Size 1:**
+
+1. `_l_ülu_ü_ik,_yen`
+2. `nonamü_erarnob:_`
+3. `a_he_läleauls_0,`
+
+**Context Size 2:**
+
+1. `n_fik_hiel_44,_in`
+2. `in_denbureizeb_sü`
+3. `s_äsoetü_18_eatan`
+
+**Context Size 3:**
+
+1. `in_labons_talevila`
+2. `_in_lega._de_8,1_k`
+3. `binom_el_komondöta`
+
+**Context Size 4:**
+
+1. `_in_grand_(pemotöl_`
+2. `binon_valmil_jöltum`
+3. `inons_fa_rosaurus_j`
+
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Predictability:** Context-4 (word) with 92.8% predictability
+- **Branching Factor:** Decreases with context size (more deterministic)
+- **Memory Trade-off:** Larger contexts require more storage (255,568 contexts)
+- **Recommendation:** Context-3 or Context-4 for text generation
+
+---
+## 4. Vocabulary Analysis
+
+![Zipf's Law](visualizations/zipf_law.png)
+
+![Top Words](visualizations/top20_words.png)
+
+![Coverage Curve](visualizations/vocab_coverage.png)
+
+### Statistics
+
+| Metric | Value |
+|--------|-------|
+| Vocabulary Size | 61,202 |
+| Total Tokens | 3,072,694 |
+| Mean Frequency | 50.21 |
+| Median Frequency | 4 |
+| Frequency Std Dev | 1018.66 |
+
+### Most Common Words
+
+| Rank | Word | Frequency |
+|------|------|-----------|
+| 1 | in | 173,526 |
+| 2 | e | 60,678 |
+| 3 | ün | 55,000 |
+| 4 | mö | 43,386 |
+| 5 | hiel | 37,203 |
+| 6 | binon | 36,034 |
+| 7 | 18 | 33,056 |
+| 8 | tü | 32,923 |
+| 9 | a | 28,195 |
+| 10 | km | 27,461 |
+
+### Least Common Words (from vocabulary)
+
+| Rank | Word | Frequency |
+|------|------|-----------|
+| 1 | birenbaum | 2 |
+| 2 | pringalle | 2 |
+| 3 | séranvillers | 2 |
+| 4 | walford | 2 |
+| 5 | gotszalk | 2 |
+| 6 | halder | 2 |
+| 7 | khetib | 2 |
+| 8 | allroggen | 2 |
+| 9 | cogeval | 2 |
+| 10 | penfentenyo | 2 |
+
+### Zipf's Law Analysis
+
+| Metric | Value |
+|--------|-------|
+| Zipf Coefficient | 1.2808 |
+| R² (Goodness of Fit) | 0.989525 |
+| Adherence Quality | **excellent** |
+
+### Coverage Analysis
+
+| Top N Words | Coverage |
+|-------------|----------|
+| Top 100 | 53.4% |
+| Top 1,000 | 83.1% |
+| Top 5,000 | 91.0% |
+| Top 10,000 | 93.6% |
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Zipf Compliance:** R²=0.9895 indicates excellent adherence to Zipf's law
+- **High Frequency Dominance:** Top 100 words cover 53.4% of corpus
+- **Long Tail:** 51,202 words needed for remaining 6.4% coverage
+
+---
+## 5. Word Embeddings Evaluation
+
+![Embedding Isotropy](visualizations/embedding_isotropy.png)
+
+![Similarity Matrix](visualizations/embedding_similarity.png)
+
+![t-SNE Words](visualizations/tsne_words.png)
+
+![t-SNE Sentences](visualizations/tsne_sentences.png)
+
+
+### 5.1 Cross-Lingual Alignment
+
+![Alignment Quality](visualizations/embedding_alignment_quality.png)
+
+![Multilingual t-SNE](visualizations/embedding_tsne_multilingual.png)
+
+
+### 5.2 Model Comparison
+
+| Model | Dimension | Isotropy | Semantic Density | Alignment R@1 | Alignment R@10 |
+|-------|-----------|----------|------------------|---------------|----------------|
+| **mono_32d** | 32 | 0.7749 | 0.3465 | N/A | N/A |
+| **mono_64d** | 64 | 0.6105 | 0.3114 | N/A | N/A |
+| **mono_128d** | 128 | 0.2495 | 0.2943 | N/A | N/A |
+| **aligned_32d** | 32 | 0.7749 🏆 | 0.3426 | 0.0780 | 0.3540 |
+| **aligned_64d** | 64 | 0.6105 | 0.3007 | 0.1300 | 0.4620 |
+| **aligned_128d** | 128 | 0.2495 | 0.2972 | 0.1540 | 0.5380 |
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Isotropy:** aligned_32d with 0.7749 (more uniform distribution)
+- **Semantic Density:** Average pairwise similarity of 0.3154. Lower values indicate better semantic separation.
+- **Alignment Quality:** Aligned models achieve up to 15.4% R@1 in cross-lingual retrieval.
+- **Recommendation:** 128d aligned for best cross-lingual performance
+
+---
+## 6.  Morphological Analysis (Experimental)
+
+This section presents an automated morphological analysis derived from the statistical divergence between word-level and subword-level models. By analyzing where subword predictability spikes and where word-level coverage fails, we can infer linguistic structures without supervised data.
+
+### 6.1 Productivity & Complexity
+
+| Metric | Value | Interpretation | Recommendation |
+|--------|-------|----------------|----------------|
+| Productivity Index | **5.000** | High morphological productivity | Reliable analysis |
+| Idiomaticity Gap | **-0.132** | Low formulaic content | - |
+
+### 6.2 Affix Inventory (Productive Units)
+
+These are the most productive prefixes and suffixes identified by sampling the vocabulary for global substitutability patterns. A unit is considered an affix if stripping it leaves a valid stem that appears in other contexts.
+
+#### Productive Prefixes
+| Prefix | Examples |
+|--------|----------|
+| `-s` | schiertz, solaize, sandwich |
+| `-b` | büchern, bottrop, buttigliera |
+| `-p` | plunumi, przeworsk, puiseaux |
+| `-a` | arsenic, antunes, anggun |
+| `-m` | matri, mira, mergentheim |
+| `-l` | logoti, laaland, lapa |
+| `-ma` | matri, mancha, maierato |
+| `-k` | kalka, kods, kupcewicz |
+
+#### Productive Suffixes
+| Suffix | Examples |
+|--------|----------|
+| `-n` | büchern, anggun, ayşen |
+| `-s` | előszállás, dykes, wars |
+| `-a` | kalka, mira, izabella |
+| `-e` | herserange, jeanette, ercole |
+| `-o` | maierato, ngo, franceinfo |
+| `-k` | frikopapük, romakatulik, przeworsk |
+| `-i` | matri, romagnosi, logoti |
+| `-r` | ever, singulier, scheler |
+
+### 6.3 Bound Stems (Lexical Roots)
+
+Bound stems are high-frequency subword units that are semantically cohesive but rarely appear as standalone words. These often correspond to the 'core' of a word that requires inflection or derivation to be valid.
+
+| Stem | Cohesion | Substitutability | Examples |
+|------|----------|------------------|----------|
+| `apük` | 2.09x | 37 contexts | tatapük, völapük, pöpapük |
+| `ödik` | 2.25x | 27 contexts | vödik, pödik, mödik |
+| `edik` | 1.91x | 39 contexts | gedik, tedik, fedik |
+| `änik` | 1.94x | 30 contexts | länik, dänik, zänik |
+| `dons` | 1.98x | 22 contexts | lödons, vedons, fidons |
+| `nons` | 2.03x | 20 contexts | binons, kanons, jinons |
+| `inon` | 1.71x | 29 contexts | ninon, vinon, binon |
+| `dabi` | 1.74x | 27 contexts | dabin, dabija, dabini |
+| `abin` | 1.59x | 32 contexts | sabin, dabin, fabin |
+| `ösod` | 2.08x | 10 contexts | pösod, pösoda, pösodi |
+| `pöso` | 2.08x | 9 contexts | pösod, pösoda, pösodi |
+| `doti` | 1.89x | 10 contexts | dotis, dotik, mödoti |
+
+### 6.4 Affix Compatibility (Co-occurrence)
+
+This table shows which prefixes and suffixes most frequently co-occur on the same stems, revealing the 'stacking' rules of the language's morphology.
+
+| Prefix | Suffix | Frequency | Examples |
+|--------|--------|-----------|----------|
+| `-p` | `-s` | 82 words | páginas, petradutöls |
+| `-c` | `-o` | 70 words | comelico, carpineto |
+| `-s` | `-n` | 70 words | saujon, sigurbjörnsson |
+| `-c` | `-a` | 66 words | chea, calera |
+| `-s` | `-s` | 65 words | seichamps, suemodas |
+| `-m` | `-s` | 62 words | mouchamps, medeiros |
+| `-c` | `-s` | 60 words | coulaines, caparrós |
+| `-s` | `-a` | 59 words | shea, santana |
+| `-m` | `-a` | 57 words | meda, madariaga |
+| `-p` | `-n` | 57 words | poldan, petershagen |
+
+### 6.5 Recursive Morpheme Segmentation
+
+Using **Recursive Hierarchical Substitutability**, we decompose complex words into their constituent morphemes. This approach handles nested affixes (e.g., `prefix-prefix-root-suffix`).
+
+| Word | Suggested Split | Confidence | Stem |
+|------|-----------------|------------|------|
+| woodville | **`woodvi-l-le`** | 7.5 | `l` |
+| childrens | **`child-re-ns`** | 7.5 | `re` |
+| coleridge | **`co-le-ridge`** | 7.5 | `ridge` |
+| vergessen | **`verges-s-en`** | 7.5 | `s` |
+| gradignan | **`gradig-n-an`** | 7.5 | `n` |
+| knesselare | **`knessel-a-re`** | 7.5 | `a` |
+| jiufotang | **`jiufot-a-ng`** | 7.5 | `a` |
+| latlanteana | **`latlante-a-na`** | 7.5 | `a` |
+| baragiano | **`baragi-a-no`** | 7.5 | `a` |
+| fotografot | **`fotograf-o-t`** | 7.5 | `o` |
+| michalska | **`michal-s-ka`** | 7.5 | `s` |
+| fransänans | **`fransän-an-s`** | 6.0 | `fransän` |
+| padadilädon | **`pa-dadiläd-on`** | 6.0 | `dadiläd` |
+| gibraltarik | **`gibraltar-ik`** | 4.5 | `gibraltar` |
+| pedakipöls | **`pedakipöl-s`** | 4.5 | `pedakipöl` |
+
+### 6.6 Linguistic Interpretation
+
+> **Automated Insight:**
+The language Volapük shows high morphological productivity. The subword models are significantly more efficient than word models, suggesting a rich system of affixation or compounding.
+
+---
+## 7. Summary & Recommendations
+
+![Performance Dashboard](visualizations/performance_dashboard.png)
+
+### Production Recommendations
+
+| Component | Recommended | Rationale |
+|-----------|-------------|-----------|
+| Tokenizer | **64k BPE** | Best compression (3.92x) |
+| N-gram | **2-gram** | Lowest perplexity (347) |
+| Markov | **Context-4** | Highest predictability (92.8%) |
+| Embeddings | **100d** | Balanced semantic capture and isotropy |
+
+
+---
+## Appendix: Metrics Glossary & Interpretation Guide
+
+This section provides definitions, intuitions, and guidance for interpreting the metrics used throughout this report.
+
+### Tokenizer Metrics
+
+**Compression Ratio**
+> *Definition:* The ratio of characters to tokens (chars/token). Measures how efficiently the tokenizer represents text.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Higher compression means fewer tokens needed to represent the same text, reducing sequence lengths for downstream models. A 3x compression means ~3 characters per token on average.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Higher is generally better for efficiency, but extremely high compression may indicate overly aggressive merging that loses morphological information.
+
+**Average Token Length (Fertility)**
+> *Definition:* Mean number of characters per token produced by the tokenizer.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Reflects the granularity of tokenization. Longer tokens capture more context but may struggle with rare words; shorter tokens are more flexible but increase sequence length.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Balance between 2-5 characters for most languages. Arabic/morphologically-rich languages may benefit from slightly longer tokens.
+
+**Unknown Token Rate (OOV Rate)**
+> *Definition:* Percentage of tokens that map to the unknown/UNK token, indicating words the tokenizer cannot represent.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Lower OOV means better vocabulary coverage. High OOV indicates the tokenizer encounters many unseen character sequences.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Below 1% is excellent; below 5% is acceptable. BPE tokenizers typically achieve very low OOV due to subword fallback.
+
+### N-gram Model Metrics
+
+**Perplexity**
+> *Definition:* Measures how "surprised" the model is by test data. Mathematically: 2^(cross-entropy). Lower values indicate better prediction.
+>
+> *Intuition:* If perplexity is 100, the model is as uncertain as if choosing uniformly among 100 options at each step. A perplexity of 10 means effectively choosing among 10 equally likely options.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Lower is better. Perplexity decreases with larger n-grams (more context). Values vary widely by language and corpus size.
+
+**Entropy**
+> *Definition:* Average information content (in bits) needed to encode the next token given the context. Related to perplexity: perplexity = 2^entropy.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High entropy means high uncertainty/randomness; low entropy means predictable patterns. Natural language typically has entropy between 1-4 bits per character.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Lower entropy indicates more predictable text patterns. Entropy should decrease as n-gram size increases.
+
+**Coverage (Top-K)**
+> *Definition:* Percentage of corpus occurrences explained by the top K most frequent n-grams.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High coverage with few patterns indicates repetitive/formulaic text; low coverage suggests diverse vocabulary usage.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Depends on use case. For language modeling, moderate coverage (40-60% with top-1000) is typical for natural text.
+
+### Markov Chain Metrics
+
+**Average Entropy**
+> *Definition:* Mean entropy across all contexts, measuring average uncertainty in next-word prediction.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Lower entropy means the model is more confident about what comes next. Context-1 has high entropy (many possible next words); Context-4 has low entropy (few likely continuations).
+>
+> *What to seek:* Decreasing entropy with larger context sizes. Very low entropy (<0.1) indicates highly deterministic transitions.
+
+**Branching Factor**
+> *Definition:* Average number of unique next tokens observed for each context.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High branching = many possible continuations (flexible but uncertain); low branching = few options (predictable but potentially repetitive).
+>
+> *What to seek:* Branching factor should decrease with context size. Values near 1.0 indicate nearly deterministic chains.
+
+**Predictability**
+> *Definition:* Derived metric: (1 - normalized_entropy) × 100%. Indicates how deterministic the model's predictions are.
+>
+> *Intuition:* 100% predictability means the next word is always certain; 0% means completely random. Real text falls between these extremes.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Higher predictability for text generation quality, but too high (>98%) may produce repetitive output.
+
+### Vocabulary & Zipf's Law Metrics
+
+**Zipf's Coefficient**
+> *Definition:* The slope of the log-log plot of word frequency vs. rank. Zipf's law predicts this should be approximately -1.
+>
+> *Intuition:* A coefficient near -1 indicates the corpus follows natural language patterns where a few words are very common and most words are rare.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Values between -0.8 and -1.2 indicate healthy natural language distribution. Deviations may suggest domain-specific or artificial text.
+
+**R² (Coefficient of Determination)**
+> *Definition:* Measures how well the linear fit explains the frequency-rank relationship. Ranges from 0 to 1.
+>
+> *Intuition:* R² near 1.0 means the data closely follows Zipf's law; lower values indicate deviation from expected word frequency patterns.
+>
+> *What to seek:* R² > 0.95 is excellent; > 0.99 indicates near-perfect Zipf adherence typical of large natural corpora.
+
+**Vocabulary Coverage**
+> *Definition:* Cumulative percentage of corpus tokens accounted for by the top N words.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Shows how concentrated word usage is. If top-100 words cover 50% of text, the corpus relies heavily on common words.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Top-100 covering 30-50% is typical. Higher coverage indicates more repetitive text; lower suggests richer vocabulary.
+
+### Word Embedding Metrics
+
+**Isotropy**
+> *Definition:* Measures how uniformly distributed vectors are in the embedding space. Computed as the ratio of minimum to maximum singular values.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High isotropy (near 1.0) means vectors spread evenly in all directions; low isotropy means vectors cluster in certain directions, reducing expressiveness.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Higher isotropy generally indicates better-quality embeddings. Values > 0.1 are reasonable; > 0.3 is good. Lower-dimensional embeddings tend to have higher isotropy.
+
+**Average Norm**
+> *Definition:* Mean magnitude (L2 norm) of word vectors in the embedding space.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Indicates the typical "length" of vectors. Consistent norms suggest stable training; high variance may indicate some words are undertrained.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Relatively consistent norms across models. The absolute value matters less than consistency (low std deviation).
+
+**Cosine Similarity**
+> *Definition:* Measures angular similarity between vectors, ranging from -1 (opposite) to 1 (identical direction).
+>
+> *Intuition:* Words with similar meanings should have high cosine similarity. This is the standard metric for semantic relatedness in embeddings.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Semantically related words should score > 0.5; unrelated words should be near 0. Synonyms often score > 0.7.
+
+**t-SNE Visualization**
+> *Definition:* t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding - a dimensionality reduction technique that preserves local structure for visualization.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Clusters in t-SNE plots indicate groups of semantically related words. Spread indicates vocabulary diversity; tight clusters suggest semantic coherence.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Meaningful clusters (e.g., numbers together, verbs together). Avoid over-interpreting distances - t-SNE preserves local, not global, structure.
+
+### General Interpretation Guidelines
+
+1. **Compare within model families:** Metrics are most meaningful when comparing models of the same type (e.g., 8k vs 64k tokenizer).
+2. **Consider trade-offs:** Better performance on one metric often comes at the cost of another (e.g., compression vs. OOV rate).
+3. **Context matters:** Optimal values depend on downstream tasks. Text generation may prioritize different metrics than classification.
+4. **Corpus influence:** All metrics are influenced by corpus characteristics. Wikipedia text differs from social media or literature.
+5. **Language-specific patterns:** Morphologically rich languages (like Arabic) may show different optimal ranges than analytic languages.
+
+
+### Visualizations Index
+
+| Visualization | Description |
+|---------------|-------------|
+| Tokenizer Compression | Compression ratios by vocabulary size |
+| Tokenizer Fertility | Average token length by vocabulary |
+| Tokenizer OOV | Unknown token rates |
+| Tokenizer Total Tokens | Total tokens by vocabulary |
+| N-gram Perplexity | Perplexity by n-gram size |
+| N-gram Entropy | Entropy by n-gram size |
+| N-gram Coverage | Top pattern coverage |
+| N-gram Unique | Unique n-gram counts |
+| Markov Entropy | Entropy by context size |
+| Markov Branching | Branching factor by context |
+| Markov Contexts | Unique context counts |
+| Zipf's Law | Frequency-rank distribution with fit |
+| Vocab Frequency | Word frequency distribution |
+| Top 20 Words | Most frequent words |
+| Vocab Coverage | Cumulative coverage curve |
+| Embedding Isotropy | Vector space uniformity |
+| Embedding Norms | Vector magnitude distribution |
+| Embedding Similarity | Word similarity heatmap |
+| Nearest Neighbors | Similar words for key terms |
+| t-SNE Words | 2D word embedding visualization |
+| t-SNE Sentences | 2D sentence embedding visualization |
+| Position Encoding | Encoding method comparison |
+| Model Sizes | Storage requirements |
+| Performance Dashboard | Comprehensive performance overview |
+
+---
+## About This Project
+
+### Data Source
+
+Models trained on [wikipedia-monthly](https://huggingface.co/datasets/omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly) - a monthly snapshot of Wikipedia articles across 300+ languages.
+
+### Project
+
+A project by **[Wikilangs](https://wikilangs.org)** - Open-source NLP models for every Wikipedia language.
+
+### Maintainer
+
+[Omar Kamali](https://omarkamali.com) - [Omneity Labs](https://omneitylabs.com)
+
+### Citation
+
+If you use these models in your research, please cite:
+
+```bibtex
+@misc{wikilangs2025,
+  author = {Kamali, Omar},
+  title = {Wikilangs: Open NLP Models for Wikipedia Languages},
+  year = {2025},
+  doi = {10.5281/zenodo.18073153},
+  publisher = {Zenodo},
+  url = {https://huggingface.co/wikilangs}
+  institution = {Omneity Labs}
+}
+```
+
+### License
+
+MIT License - Free for academic and commercial use.
+
+### Links
+
+- 🌐 Website: [wikilangs.org](https://wikilangs.org)
+- 🤗 Models: [huggingface.co/wikilangs](https://huggingface.co/wikilangs)
+- 📊 Data: [wikipedia-monthly](https://huggingface.co/datasets/omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly)
+- 👤 Author: [Omar Kamali](https://huggingface.co/omarkamali)
+- 🤝 Sponsor: [Featherless AI](https://featherless.ai)
+---
+*Generated by Wikilangs Models Pipeline*
+
+*Report Date: 2026-01-11 03:34:47*

models/embeddings/aligned/vo_128d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:a3c4c0a49557898d2064ce658eddad53218a28861abd93a1dc52ab20906e990f
+size 1054066630

models/embeddings/aligned/vo_128d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "vo", "dim": 128, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": true}

models/embeddings/aligned/vo_128d.projection.npy

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:ebfabdc51a45d62b5893fd4f296be3fe9271678e6cace508b241cb1fb149859d
+size 65664

models/embeddings/aligned/vo_128d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+{
+  "language": "vo",
+  "dimension": 128,
+  "version": "aligned",
+  "hub_language": "en",
+  "seed_vocab_size": 16013,
+  "vocab_size": 28888
+}

models/embeddings/aligned/vo_32d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:3ada04b68edf5d61c19d25fca413252d6b82fc6650f779656ee4b0028f25c044
+size 263880646

models/embeddings/aligned/vo_32d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "vo", "dim": 32, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": true}

models/embeddings/aligned/vo_32d.projection.npy

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:234f8e65cd62a461d07fe737fa1d6b5d46e4eab3643fa63c205cfdf554c63608
+size 4224

models/embeddings/aligned/vo_32d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+{
+  "language": "vo",
+  "dimension": 32,
+  "version": "aligned",
+  "hub_language": "en",
+  "seed_vocab_size": 16013,
+  "vocab_size": 28888
+}

models/embeddings/aligned/vo_64d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:51e4e1a8a2b6569543b09b23e7f2c382b81d300b252787a65fdef945c5e8fd2e
+size 527275974

models/embeddings/aligned/vo_64d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "vo", "dim": 64, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": true}

models/embeddings/aligned/vo_64d.projection.npy

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:ce29a6a6029d56631df744b9f0b5b24092d471044ed69e0f3f98fdd36d66f3c8
+size 16512

models/embeddings/aligned/vo_64d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+{
+  "language": "vo",
+  "dimension": 64,
+  "version": "aligned",
+  "hub_language": "en",
+  "seed_vocab_size": 16013,
+  "vocab_size": 28888
+}

models/embeddings/monolingual/vo_128d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:a3c4c0a49557898d2064ce658eddad53218a28861abd93a1dc52ab20906e990f
+size 1054066630

models/embeddings/monolingual/vo_128d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "vo", "dim": 128, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": false}

models/embeddings/monolingual/vo_128d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+{
+  "language": "vo",
+  "dimension": 128,
+  "version": "monolingual",
+  "training_params": {
+    "algorithm": "skipgram",
+    "min_count": 5,
+    "window": 5,
+    "negative": 5,
+    "epochs": 5,
+    "encoding_method": "rope",
+    "dim": 128,
+    "threads": 5
+  },
+  "vocab_size": 28888
+}

models/embeddings/monolingual/vo_32d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:3ada04b68edf5d61c19d25fca413252d6b82fc6650f779656ee4b0028f25c044
+size 263880646

models/embeddings/monolingual/vo_32d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "vo", "dim": 32, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": false}

models/embeddings/monolingual/vo_32d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+{
+  "language": "vo",
+  "dimension": 32,
+  "version": "monolingual",
+  "training_params": {
+    "algorithm": "skipgram",
+    "min_count": 5,
+    "window": 5,
+    "negative": 5,
+    "epochs": 5,
+    "encoding_method": "rope",
+    "dim": 32,
+    "threads": 5
+  },
+  "vocab_size": 28888
+}

models/embeddings/monolingual/vo_64d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:51e4e1a8a2b6569543b09b23e7f2c382b81d300b252787a65fdef945c5e8fd2e
+size 527275974

models/embeddings/monolingual/vo_64d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "vo", "dim": 64, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": false}

models/embeddings/monolingual/vo_64d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+{
+  "language": "vo",
+  "dimension": 64,
+  "version": "monolingual",
+  "training_params": {
+    "algorithm": "skipgram",
+    "min_count": 5,
+    "window": 5,
+    "negative": 5,
+    "epochs": 5,
+    "encoding_method": "rope",
+    "dim": 64,
+    "threads": 5
+  },
+  "vocab_size": 28888
+}

models/subword_markov/vo_markov_ctx1_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:88e344ccce1b8028422e5347356b4cae63764f04c8c7198525ca67d90c2456fd
+size 103842

models/subword_markov/vo_markov_ctx1_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 1,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "vo",
+  "unique_contexts": 1924,
+  "total_transitions": 18495291
+}

models/subword_markov/vo_markov_ctx2_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:6deaf4d56c65b95f4ffdf3804e3839d3856e4ddbe07affb89e92f89e0c4a6da6
+size 555139

models/subword_markov/vo_markov_ctx2_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 2,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "vo",
+  "unique_contexts": 12269,
+  "total_transitions": 18449244
+}

models/subword_markov/vo_markov_ctx3_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:66e1bd946a1cb924de76e0a5514f7a669b0649f073fa1d8961ca2593d353d6b8
+size 2020940

models/subword_markov/vo_markov_ctx3_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 3,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "vo",
+  "unique_contexts": 63875,
+  "total_transitions": 18403197
+}

models/subword_markov/vo_markov_ctx4_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:b220f9c9f6e188a7170404ad793884d433e91186d7f524cfef1251260bdd992b
+size 5765102

models/subword_markov/vo_markov_ctx4_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 4,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "vo",
+  "unique_contexts": 255568,
+  "total_transitions": 18357150
+}

models/subword_ngram/vo_2gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:9ed80fd1786b89ae3c8ff2b4002e82c196a8da06d2d297e6c6be92ba5db7cd7c
+size 64333

models/subword_ngram/vo_2gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 2,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "vo",
+  "unique_ngrams": 4542,
+  "total_ngrams": 18495291
+}

models/subword_ngram/vo_3gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:855a90757774b89f5df11b371f97a1dcd91203e04185864508c3e44b90058aae
+size 434049

models/subword_ngram/vo_3gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 3,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "vo",
+  "unique_ngrams": 32775,
+  "total_ngrams": 18449244
+}

models/subword_ngram/vo_4gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:a1ebb889cbe726e715bfca9e4e79dc8e496e8f7a7cbff3013721f08402bc845d
+size 1847729

models/subword_ngram/vo_4gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 4,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "vo",
+  "unique_ngrams": 160036,
+  "total_ngrams": 18403197
+}

models/subword_ngram/vo_5gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:870b99acd1e39009c6005a2588159beed9917812c870a22beaad954480d35ff7
+size 4837893

models/subword_ngram/vo_5gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 5,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "vo",
+  "unique_ngrams": 420224,
+  "total_ngrams": 18357150
+}

models/tokenizer/vo_tokenizer_16k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:fee3983c663e73af7ba246d13a87b73f72a151db07ce39d56a603feeb0c425a7
+size 503291

models/tokenizer/vo_tokenizer_32k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:aefdc02ba3d3795ed2b5eb2388719aaca8f76252c1881e69fe4a96772a7692eb
+size 774231

models/tokenizer/vo_tokenizer_64k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:ba40b3fb90eb0b1f3e514b1c95e8e557b9181dd5d5abc996d98832754044e785
+size 1345709

models/tokenizer/vo_tokenizer_8k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:08be5499868cad0053cd443d2df948f631883ef7a22987cad3a0c454a375b98c
+size 371451

models/vocabulary/vo_vocabulary.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:2fb15196aeadd2bd1fef3bc54af0b3b26894b1d4c4f383b80c1c7dad9ab85945
+size 1047509

models/vocabulary/vo_vocabulary_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+{
+  "language": "vo",
+  "vocabulary_size": 61202,
+  "variant": "full",
+  "statistics": {
+    "type_token_ratio": 0.03764522040906977,
+    "coverage": {
+      "top_100": 0.5239576326297137,
+      "top_1000": 0.8164557831716089,
+      "top_5000": 0.8933360389480698,
+      "top_10000": 0.919408045582152
+    },
+    "hapax_count": 56601,
+    "hapax_ratio": 0.480471634848009,
+    "total_documents": 46047
+  }
+}

models/word_markov/vo_markov_ctx1_word.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:4cd2cf25c058b6e200dca47675e88c0cfffe0e2dcab511d1ba4d28e63a119488
+size 4823426