Upload all models and assets for wo (latest)

.gitattributes

@@ -33,3 +33,10 @@ saved_model/**/* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *.zip filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *.zst filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
 *tfevents* filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/embedding_similarity.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/embedding_tsne_multilingual.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/performance_dashboard.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/position_encoding_comparison.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/tsne_sentences.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/tsne_words.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text
+visualizations/zipf_law.png filter=lfs diff=lfs merge=lfs -text

README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,769 @@
+---
+language: wo
+language_name: Wolof
+language_family: atlantic_other
+tags:
+  - wikilangs
+  - nlp
+  - tokenizer
+  - embeddings
+  - n-gram
+  - markov
+  - wikipedia
+  - feature-extraction
+  - sentence-similarity
+  - tokenization
+  - n-grams
+  - markov-chain
+  - text-mining
+  - fasttext
+  - babelvec
+  - vocabulous
+  - vocabulary
+  - monolingual
+  - family-atlantic_other
+license: mit
+library_name: wikilangs
+pipeline_tag: text-generation
+datasets:
+  - omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly
+dataset_info:
+  name: wikipedia-monthly
+  description: Monthly snapshots of Wikipedia articles across 300+ languages
+metrics:
+  - name: best_compression_ratio
+    type: compression
+    value: 3.834
+  - name: best_isotropy
+    type: isotropy
+    value: 0.8649
+  - name: vocabulary_size
+    type: vocab
+    value: 0
+generated: 2026-01-11
+---
+
+# Wolof - Wikilangs Models
+## Comprehensive Research Report & Full Ablation Study
+
+This repository contains NLP models trained and evaluated by Wikilangs, specifically on **Wolof** Wikipedia data.
+We analyze tokenizers, n-gram models, Markov chains, vocabulary statistics, and word embeddings.
+
+## 📋 Repository Contents
+
+### Models & Assets
+
+- Tokenizers (8k, 16k, 32k, 64k)
+- N-gram models (2, 3, 4, 5-gram)
+- Markov chains (context of 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5)
+- Subword N-gram and Markov chains
+- Embeddings in various sizes and dimensions (aligned and unaligned)
+- Language Vocabulary
+- Language Statistics
+
+![Performance Dashboard](visualizations/performance_dashboard.png)
+
+### Analysis and Evaluation
+
+- [1. Tokenizer Evaluation](#1-tokenizer-evaluation)
+- [2. N-gram Model Evaluation](#2-n-gram-model-evaluation)
+- [3. Markov Chain Evaluation](#3-markov-chain-evaluation)
+- [4. Vocabulary Analysis](#4-vocabulary-analysis)
+- [5. Word Embeddings Evaluation](#5-word-embeddings-evaluation)
+- [6. Morphological Analysis (Experimental)](#6--morphological-analysis-experimental)
+- [7. Summary & Recommendations](#7-summary--recommendations)
+- [Metrics Glossary](#appendix-metrics-glossary--interpretation-guide)
+- [Visualizations Index](#visualizations-index)
+
+---
+## 1. Tokenizer Evaluation
+
+![Tokenizer Compression](visualizations/tokenizer_compression.png)
+
+![Tokenizer Fertility](visualizations/tokenizer_fertility.png)
+
+![Tokenizer OOV](visualizations/tokenizer_oov.png)
+
+![Total Tokens](visualizations/tokenizer_total_tokens.png)
+
+### Results
+
+| Vocab Size | Compression | Avg Token Len | UNK Rate | Total Tokens |
+|------------|-------------|---------------|----------|--------------|
+| **8k** | 3.486x | 3.49 | 0.1614% | 779,481 |
+| **16k** | 3.696x | 3.70 | 0.1711% | 735,134 |
+| **32k** | 3.834x 🏆 | 3.84 | 0.1775% | 708,618 |
+
+### Tokenization Examples
+
+Below are sample sentences tokenized with each vocabulary size:
+
+**Sample 1:** `Nuweel Kaledooni : Dun Faraas (Géejpeek u Pacifik)`
+
+| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
+|-------|--------|-------|
+| 8k | `▁nu w eel ▁k ale dooni ▁: ▁dun ▁faraas ▁( ... (+6 more)` | 16 |
+| 16k | `▁nuweel ▁kaledooni ▁: ▁dun ▁faraas ▁( géejpeek ▁u ▁pacifik )` | 10 |
+| 32k | `▁nuweel ▁kaledooni ▁: ▁dun ▁faraas ▁( géejpeek ▁u ▁pacifik )` | 10 |
+
+**Sample 2:** `Makaaw (澳門) (澳門特別行政區 , Resiyoŋ u Administaraasioŋ Espesiyaal u Ciin bu Makaaw). ...`
+
+| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
+|-------|--------|-------|
+| 8k | `▁mak aaw ▁( 澳門 ) ▁( 澳門特別行政區 ▁, ▁res iyoŋ ... (+17 more)` | 27 |
+| 16k | `▁makaaw ▁( 澳門 ) ▁( 澳門特別行政區 ▁, ▁res iyoŋ ▁u ... (+11 more)` | 21 |
+| 32k | `▁makaaw ▁( 澳門 ) ▁( 澳門特別行政區 ▁, ▁res iyoŋ ▁u ... (+9 more)` | 19 |
+
+**Sample 3:** `Kingisepp (Кингисепп) dëkku di Riisi. Nitñii motnañu 48 488 Riisi`
+
+| Vocab | Tokens | Count |
+|-------|--------|-------|
+| 8k | `▁k ing is epp ▁( ки н г ис е ... (+17 more)` | 27 |
+| 16k | `▁king is epp ▁( ки н г ис е п ... (+16 more)` | 26 |
+| 32k | `▁kingisepp ▁( кингисепп ) ▁dëkku ▁di ▁riisi . ▁nitñii ▁motnañu ... (+8 more)` | 18 |
+
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Compression:** 32k achieves 3.834x compression
+- **Lowest UNK Rate:** 8k with 0.1614% unknown tokens
+- **Trade-off:** Larger vocabularies improve compression but increase model size
+- **Recommendation:** 32k vocabulary provides optimal balance for production use
+
+---
+## 2. N-gram Model Evaluation
+
+![N-gram Perplexity](visualizations/ngram_perplexity.png)
+
+![N-gram Unique](visualizations/ngram_unique.png)
+
+![N-gram Coverage](visualizations/ngram_coverage.png)
+
+### Results
+
+| N-gram | Variant | Perplexity | Entropy | Unique N-grams | Top-100 Coverage | Top-1000 Coverage |
+|--------|---------|------------|---------|----------------|------------------|-------------------|
+| **2-gram** | Word | 9,913 | 13.28 | 21,313 | 12.7% | 36.9% |
+| **2-gram** | Subword | 263 🏆 | 8.04 | 2,618 | 68.3% | 99.2% |
+| **3-gram** | Word | 53,177 | 15.70 | 71,583 | 3.9% | 12.9% |
+| **3-gram** | Subword | 2,089 | 11.03 | 17,992 | 26.5% | 74.1% |
+| **4-gram** | Word | 122,855 | 16.91 | 135,374 | 1.5% | 4.7% |
+| **4-gram** | Subword | 11,307 | 13.46 | 78,032 | 12.0% | 38.9% |
+| **5-gram** | Word | 127,965 | 16.97 | 134,813 | 0.9% | 3.0% |
+| **5-gram** | Subword | 39,248 | 15.26 | 182,915 | 6.0% | 23.4% |
+
+### Top 5 N-grams by Size
+
+**2-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `xam ne` | 1,468 |
+| 2 | `na ci` | 1,268 |
+| 3 | `yi ci` | 1,216 |
+| 4 | `gën a` | 1,163 |
+| 5 | `xam xam` | 1,152 |
+
+**3-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `nga xam ne` | 1,027 |
+| 2 | `bokk na ci` | 471 |
+| 3 | `bu ko defee` | 451 |
+| 4 | `yu mag yi` | 235 |
+| 5 | `lëkkalekaay yu biti` | 230 |
+
+**4-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `yi nga xam ne` | 207 |
+| 2 | `bi j y m` | 156 |
+| 3 | `from the original on` | 125 |
+| 4 | `ak delluwaay lëkkalekaay yu` | 119 |
+| 5 | `delluwaay lëkkalekaay yu biti` | 119 |
+
+**5-grams (Word):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `karmat ak delluwaay lëkkalekaay yu` | 119 |
+| 2 | `ak delluwaay lëkkalekaay yu biti` | 119 |
+| 3 | `archived from the original on` | 103 |
+| 4 | `yonnant bi j y m` | 94 |
+| 5 | `de wikipédia avec notice d` | 66 |
+
+**2-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `i _` | 107,629 |
+| 2 | `u _` | 77,269 |
+| 3 | `a _` | 63,166 |
+| 4 | `_ n` | 58,031 |
+| 5 | `a a` | 56,077 |
+
+**3-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `_ c i` | 35,175 |
+| 2 | `c i _` | 33,981 |
+| 3 | `_ n a` | 17,142 |
+| 4 | `_ a k` | 15,769 |
+| 5 | `a k _` | 15,662 |
+
+**4-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `_ c i _` | 33,053 |
+| 2 | `_ a k _` | 14,628 |
+| 3 | `o o n _` | 11,321 |
+| 4 | `_ k o _` | 9,009 |
+| 5 | `_ y i _` | 8,939 |
+
+**5-grams (Subword):**
+
+| Rank | N-gram | Count |
+|------|--------|-------|
+| 1 | `i _ c i _` | 3,876 |
+| 2 | `_ n e k k` | 3,635 |
+| 3 | `_ m o o m` | 3,495 |
+| 4 | `_ w o o n` | 3,436 |
+| 5 | `m o o y _` | 3,277 |
+
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Perplexity:** 2-gram (subword) with 263
+- **Entropy Trend:** Decreases with larger n-grams (more predictable)
+- **Coverage:** Top-1000 patterns cover ~23% of corpus
+- **Recommendation:** 4-gram or 5-gram for best predictive performance
+
+---
+## 3. Markov Chain Evaluation
+
+![Markov Entropy](visualizations/markov_entropy.png)
+
+![Markov Contexts](visualizations/markov_contexts.png)
+
+![Markov Branching](visualizations/markov_branching.png)
+
+### Results
+
+| Context | Variant | Avg Entropy | Perplexity | Branching Factor | Unique Contexts | Predictability |
+|---------|---------|-------------|------------|------------------|-----------------|----------------|
+| **1** | Word | 0.8104 | 1.754 | 5.71 | 40,525 | 19.0% |
+| **1** | Subword | 1.2572 | 2.390 | 9.28 | 630 | 0.0% |
+| **2** | Word | 0.2934 | 1.226 | 1.70 | 230,646 | 70.7% |
+| **2** | Subword | 0.9933 | 1.991 | 5.75 | 5,840 | 0.7% |
+| **3** | Word | 0.0951 | 1.068 | 1.15 | 392,178 | 90.5% |
+| **3** | Subword | 0.8004 | 1.742 | 3.76 | 33,559 | 20.0% |
+| **4** | Word | 0.0328 🏆 | 1.023 | 1.04 | 450,681 | 96.7% |
+| **4** | Subword | 0.6046 | 1.521 | 2.58 | 126,072 | 39.5% |
+
+### Generated Text Samples (Word-based)
+
+Below are text samples generated from each word-based Markov chain model:
+
+**Context Size 1:**
+
+1. `ci tariixa xaadiriya ci waxtub xër dafa yem diwam bokk na tudde wenn waxambaane tegi tànkam`
+2. `ak yu gàtti dig lu jëkk moo taxoon seex ibraahima mbeng nekkoon seen diggante loolu yërmande`
+3. `yi ci wolof mi am ci li moo doon jëfandikoo rawatina nag ag jiital tudd naa`
+
+**Context Size 2:**
+
+1. `xam ne day leeral li waa espaañ ak holand ànd ak xol asaf naa nag ñu doon`
+2. `na ci diggante askan yeek seeni goornamaa loolu tam dooleel bennoo gu almaañ gi ñu dugal ko`
+3. `yi ci tugal bu yees bii tay goornamaay tugal yi ci ngérum tàggat dajale leen du nu`
+
+**Context Size 3:**
+
+1. `nga xam ne danuy sukkandiku ci li nekk ci ginnaaw tawaaful qudoom te jokk ci su dee ajkat`
+2. `bokk na ci mbootaay yu bari oif au cedeao ak ñoom seen te jumtukaay yi muy jëfandikoo amuñu`
+3. `bu ko defee mu song ko ca tripoli gu soww ga atum daal di fas kollareg litofski gi`
+
+**Context Size 4:**
+
+1. `yi nga xam ne xareb adduna bu njëkk bi yëgoon nanu ne danu leen a xañoon itaali ca ndajem`
+2. `bi j y m mas naa teew bis kenn ci boroom xam xam yi nag li gën a lëng`
+3. `from the original on retrieved bu ci melni bu polio bi bobu wane na ni ay ndaw mën nañ`
+
+
+### Generated Text Samples (Subword-based)
+
+Below are text samples generated from each subword-based Markov chain model:
+
+**Context Size 1:**
+
+1. `_tonnde_m_jiy_cà`
+2. `aakonckku_ko_ten`
+3. `i,_amen_ci-jëmee`
+
+**Context Size 2:**
+
+1. `i_de_we_doon_saak`
+2. `u_aki_aji_lu_mu_m`
+3. `a_konaal_nekk_ye_`
+
+**Context Size 3:**
+
+1. `_ci_na_bindikoonan`
+2. `ci_niou,_lool_bind`
+3. `_na_bi_ci_seere_ni`
+
+**Context Size 4:**
+
+1. `_ci_jii_nag_mbëj,_m`
+2. `_ak_wu_jéggi,nekk_c`
+3. `oon_à_l'emmeel_bi,_`
+
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Predictability:** Context-4 (word) with 96.7% predictability
+- **Branching Factor:** Decreases with context size (more deterministic)
+- **Memory Trade-off:** Larger contexts require more storage (126,072 contexts)
+- **Recommendation:** Context-3 or Context-4 for text generation
+
+---
+## 4. Vocabulary Analysis
+
+![Zipf's Law](visualizations/zipf_law.png)
+
+![Top Words](visualizations/top20_words.png)
+
+![Coverage Curve](visualizations/vocab_coverage.png)
+
+### Statistics
+
+| Metric | Value |
+|--------|-------|
+| Vocabulary Size | 21,320 |
+| Total Tokens | 669,546 |
+| Mean Frequency | 31.40 |
+| Median Frequency | 4 |
+| Frequency Std Dev | 356.08 |
+
+### Most Common Words
+
+| Rank | Word | Frequency |
+|------|------|-----------|
+| 1 | ci | 34,235 |
+| 2 | ak | 15,534 |
+| 3 | yi | 12,854 |
+| 4 | ko | 10,384 |
+| 5 | bi | 10,094 |
+| 6 | di | 8,275 |
+| 7 | mu | 7,957 |
+| 8 | bu | 7,472 |
+| 9 | na | 7,210 |
+| 10 | yu | 6,832 |
+
+### Least Common Words (from vocabulary)
+
+| Rank | Word | Frequency |
+|------|------|-----------|
+| 1 | kapi | 2 |
+| 2 | aicha | 2 |
+| 3 | fassou | 2 |
+| 4 | sagno | 2 |
+| 5 | rugby | 2 |
+| 6 | souaré | 2 |
+| 7 | yéro | 2 |
+| 8 | guinéenne | 2 |
+| 9 | kandet | 2 |
+| 10 | diawara | 2 |
+
+### Zipf's Law Analysis
+
+| Metric | Value |
+|--------|-------|
+| Zipf Coefficient | 1.2143 |
+| R² (Goodness of Fit) | 0.993629 |
+| Adherence Quality | **excellent** |
+
+### Coverage Analysis
+
+| Top N Words | Coverage |
+|-------------|----------|
+| Top 100 | 46.2% |
+| Top 1,000 | 76.0% |
+| Top 5,000 | 91.1% |
+| Top 10,000 | 95.7% |
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Zipf Compliance:** R²=0.9936 indicates excellent adherence to Zipf's law
+- **High Frequency Dominance:** Top 100 words cover 46.2% of corpus
+- **Long Tail:** 11,320 words needed for remaining 4.3% coverage
+
+---
+## 5. Word Embeddings Evaluation
+
+![Embedding Isotropy](visualizations/embedding_isotropy.png)
+
+![Similarity Matrix](visualizations/embedding_similarity.png)
+
+![t-SNE Words](visualizations/tsne_words.png)
+
+![t-SNE Sentences](visualizations/tsne_sentences.png)
+
+
+### 5.1 Cross-Lingual Alignment
+
+![Alignment Quality](visualizations/embedding_alignment_quality.png)
+
+![Multilingual t-SNE](visualizations/embedding_tsne_multilingual.png)
+
+
+### 5.2 Model Comparison
+
+| Model | Dimension | Isotropy | Semantic Density | Alignment R@1 | Alignment R@10 |
+|-------|-----------|----------|------------------|---------------|----------------|
+| **mono_32d** | 32 | 0.8649 🏆 | 0.3602 | N/A | N/A |
+| **mono_64d** | 64 | 0.7358 | 0.2985 | N/A | N/A |
+| **mono_128d** | 128 | 0.2553 | 0.2614 | N/A | N/A |
+| **aligned_32d** | 32 | 0.8649 | 0.3643 | 0.0160 | 0.1220 |
+| **aligned_64d** | 64 | 0.7358 | 0.3085 | 0.0280 | 0.2040 |
+| **aligned_128d** | 128 | 0.2553 | 0.2646 | 0.0560 | 0.2420 |
+
+### Key Findings
+
+- **Best Isotropy:** mono_32d with 0.8649 (more uniform distribution)
+- **Semantic Density:** Average pairwise similarity of 0.3096. Lower values indicate better semantic separation.
+- **Alignment Quality:** Aligned models achieve up to 5.6% R@1 in cross-lingual retrieval.
+- **Recommendation:** 128d aligned for best cross-lingual performance
+
+---
+## 6.  Morphological Analysis (Experimental)
+
+This section presents an automated morphological analysis derived from the statistical divergence between word-level and subword-level models. By analyzing where subword predictability spikes and where word-level coverage fails, we can infer linguistic structures without supervised data.
+
+### 6.1 Productivity & Complexity
+
+| Metric | Value | Interpretation | Recommendation |
+|--------|-------|----------------|----------------|
+| Productivity Index | **5.000** | High morphological productivity | Reliable analysis |
+| Idiomaticity Gap | **-0.871** | Low formulaic content | - |
+
+### 6.2 Affix Inventory (Productive Units)
+
+These are the most productive prefixes and suffixes identified by sampling the vocabulary for global substitutability patterns. A unit is considered an affix if stripping it leaves a valid stem that appears in other contexts.
+
+#### Productive Prefixes
+| Prefix | Examples |
+|--------|----------|
+| `-s` | saytuloo, saws, sayyidimaa |
+| `-a` | andis, afc, aamustrong |
+| `-m` | magellan, mujjam, médecine |
+| `-b` | bërëp, bàyyiwoon, bashiir |
+| `-d` | dammte, dadi, dimbale |
+| `-n` | natoo, notee, nationale |
+| `-t` | tv, tenqam, tóoru |
+| `-ma` | magellan, mar, maritime |
+
+#### Productive Suffixes
+| Suffix | Examples |
+|--------|----------|
+| `-e` | xiirtalante, relatée, notee |
+| `-n` | bàyyiwoon, chemin, magellan |
+| `-i` | lakkati, rakki, parti |
+| `-l` | wiccal, ñenteel, jërul |
+| `-a` | jola, keita, sayyidimaa |
+| `-u` | gondiku, tóoru, sosu |
+| `-s` | andis, saws, joxees |
+| `-on` | bàyyiwoon, àndutoon, interprétation |
+
+### 6.3 Bound Stems (Lexical Roots)
+
+Bound stems are high-frequency subword units that are semantically cohesive but rarely appear as standalone words. These often correspond to the 'core' of a word that requires inflection or derivation to be valid.
+
+| Stem | Cohesion | Substitutability | Examples |
+|------|----------|------------------|----------|
+| `tion` | 2.39x | 17 contexts | nation, notion, option |
+| `oroo` | 1.98x | 29 contexts | loroo, joroom, woroom |
+| `enee` | 2.00x | 26 contexts | benee, weneen, yéenee |
+| `ante` | 1.77x | 39 contexts | dante, kante, wante |
+| `maan` | 1.65x | 41 contexts | maang, maane, maana |
+| `araa` | 1.42x | 65 contexts | araab, saraa, araam |
+| `raan` | 1.70x | 29 contexts | iraan, xiraan, fraans |
+| `àlla` | 1.77x | 25 contexts | yàlla, wàlla, àllaa |
+| `oole` | 1.66x | 27 contexts | doole, boole, xoole |
+| `aari` | 1.56x | 33 contexts | yaari, naari, baari |
+| `afri` | 2.06x | 13 contexts | afric, afrig, afrik |
+| `kkoo` | 1.52x | 34 contexts | dàkkoo, jokkoo, sàkkoo |
+
+### 6.4 Affix Compatibility (Co-occurrence)
+
+This table shows which prefixes and suffixes most frequently co-occur on the same stems, revealing the 'stacking' rules of the language's morphology.
+
+| Prefix | Suffix | Frequency | Examples |
+|--------|--------|-----------|----------|
+| `-s` | `-e` | 55 words | secondaire, seete |
+| `-m` | `-e` | 46 words | mbusóobe, matiere |
+| `-d` | `-e` | 43 words | dofe, dikke |
+| `-m` | `-a` | 42 words | miimiya, maginta |
+| `-t` | `-e` | 40 words | toogee, tëjee |
+| `-m` | `-i` | 39 words | maymooni, mai |
+| `-m` | `-n` | 38 words | mbàmbullaan, muttaquun |
+| `-t` | `-n` | 36 words | telefon, tëjoon |
+| `-a` | `-i` | 35 words | asi, almeeri |
+| `-m` | `-m` | 34 words | mycobacterium, muurum |
+
+### 6.5 Recursive Morpheme Segmentation
+
+Using **Recursive Hierarchical Substitutability**, we decompose complex words into their constituent morphemes. This approach handles nested affixes (e.g., `prefix-prefix-root-suffix`).
+
+| Word | Suggested Split | Confidence | Stem |
+|------|-----------------|------------|------|
+| mokkalloo | **`mokkal-l-oo`** | 7.5 | `l` |
+| ulaayikal | **`ulaayi-k-al`** | 7.5 | `k` |
+| politigkat | **`politig-k-at`** | 7.5 | `k` |
+| ndokkeelsi | **`ndokkeel-s-i`** | 7.5 | `s` |
+| endustreem | **`endustr-e-em`** | 7.5 | `e` |
+| rafetatul | **`rafet-at-ul`** | 6.0 | `rafet` |
+| terewuloon | **`terewul-o-on`** | 6.0 | `terewul` |
+| serigneum | **`serigne-u-m`** | 6.0 | `serigne` |
+| ahmadubnu | **`ahmad-ub-nu`** | 6.0 | `ahmad` |
+| séddaleeb | **`séddalee-b`** | 4.5 | `séddalee` |
+| siyaareem | **`siyaaree-m`** | 4.5 | `siyaaree` |
+| kolombiya | **`kolombi-ya`** | 4.5 | `kolombi` |
+| detection | **`de-te-ction`** | 4.5 | `ction` |
+| jubluwunu | **`jubluwu-nu`** | 4.5 | `jubluwu` |
+| melosuufug | **`melosuuf-ug`** | 4.5 | `melosuuf` |
+
+### 6.6 Linguistic Interpretation
+
+> **Automated Insight:**
+The language Wolof shows high morphological productivity. The subword models are significantly more efficient than word models, suggesting a rich system of affixation or compounding.
+
+---
+## 7. Summary & Recommendations
+
+![Performance Dashboard](visualizations/performance_dashboard.png)
+
+### Production Recommendations
+
+| Component | Recommended | Rationale |
+|-----------|-------------|-----------|
+| Tokenizer | **32k BPE** | Best compression (3.83x) |
+| N-gram | **2-gram** | Lowest perplexity (263) |
+| Markov | **Context-4** | Highest predictability (96.7%) |
+| Embeddings | **100d** | Balanced semantic capture and isotropy |
+
+
+---
+## Appendix: Metrics Glossary & Interpretation Guide
+
+This section provides definitions, intuitions, and guidance for interpreting the metrics used throughout this report.
+
+### Tokenizer Metrics
+
+**Compression Ratio**
+> *Definition:* The ratio of characters to tokens (chars/token). Measures how efficiently the tokenizer represents text.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Higher compression means fewer tokens needed to represent the same text, reducing sequence lengths for downstream models. A 3x compression means ~3 characters per token on average.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Higher is generally better for efficiency, but extremely high compression may indicate overly aggressive merging that loses morphological information.
+
+**Average Token Length (Fertility)**
+> *Definition:* Mean number of characters per token produced by the tokenizer.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Reflects the granularity of tokenization. Longer tokens capture more context but may struggle with rare words; shorter tokens are more flexible but increase sequence length.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Balance between 2-5 characters for most languages. Arabic/morphologically-rich languages may benefit from slightly longer tokens.
+
+**Unknown Token Rate (OOV Rate)**
+> *Definition:* Percentage of tokens that map to the unknown/UNK token, indicating words the tokenizer cannot represent.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Lower OOV means better vocabulary coverage. High OOV indicates the tokenizer encounters many unseen character sequences.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Below 1% is excellent; below 5% is acceptable. BPE tokenizers typically achieve very low OOV due to subword fallback.
+
+### N-gram Model Metrics
+
+**Perplexity**
+> *Definition:* Measures how "surprised" the model is by test data. Mathematically: 2^(cross-entropy). Lower values indicate better prediction.
+>
+> *Intuition:* If perplexity is 100, the model is as uncertain as if choosing uniformly among 100 options at each step. A perplexity of 10 means effectively choosing among 10 equally likely options.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Lower is better. Perplexity decreases with larger n-grams (more context). Values vary widely by language and corpus size.
+
+**Entropy**
+> *Definition:* Average information content (in bits) needed to encode the next token given the context. Related to perplexity: perplexity = 2^entropy.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High entropy means high uncertainty/randomness; low entropy means predictable patterns. Natural language typically has entropy between 1-4 bits per character.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Lower entropy indicates more predictable text patterns. Entropy should decrease as n-gram size increases.
+
+**Coverage (Top-K)**
+> *Definition:* Percentage of corpus occurrences explained by the top K most frequent n-grams.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High coverage with few patterns indicates repetitive/formulaic text; low coverage suggests diverse vocabulary usage.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Depends on use case. For language modeling, moderate coverage (40-60% with top-1000) is typical for natural text.
+
+### Markov Chain Metrics
+
+**Average Entropy**
+> *Definition:* Mean entropy across all contexts, measuring average uncertainty in next-word prediction.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Lower entropy means the model is more confident about what comes next. Context-1 has high entropy (many possible next words); Context-4 has low entropy (few likely continuations).
+>
+> *What to seek:* Decreasing entropy with larger context sizes. Very low entropy (<0.1) indicates highly deterministic transitions.
+
+**Branching Factor**
+> *Definition:* Average number of unique next tokens observed for each context.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High branching = many possible continuations (flexible but uncertain); low branching = few options (predictable but potentially repetitive).
+>
+> *What to seek:* Branching factor should decrease with context size. Values near 1.0 indicate nearly deterministic chains.
+
+**Predictability**
+> *Definition:* Derived metric: (1 - normalized_entropy) × 100%. Indicates how deterministic the model's predictions are.
+>
+> *Intuition:* 100% predictability means the next word is always certain; 0% means completely random. Real text falls between these extremes.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Higher predictability for text generation quality, but too high (>98%) may produce repetitive output.
+
+### Vocabulary & Zipf's Law Metrics
+
+**Zipf's Coefficient**
+> *Definition:* The slope of the log-log plot of word frequency vs. rank. Zipf's law predicts this should be approximately -1.
+>
+> *Intuition:* A coefficient near -1 indicates the corpus follows natural language patterns where a few words are very common and most words are rare.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Values between -0.8 and -1.2 indicate healthy natural language distribution. Deviations may suggest domain-specific or artificial text.
+
+**R² (Coefficient of Determination)**
+> *Definition:* Measures how well the linear fit explains the frequency-rank relationship. Ranges from 0 to 1.
+>
+> *Intuition:* R² near 1.0 means the data closely follows Zipf's law; lower values indicate deviation from expected word frequency patterns.
+>
+> *What to seek:* R² > 0.95 is excellent; > 0.99 indicates near-perfect Zipf adherence typical of large natural corpora.
+
+**Vocabulary Coverage**
+> *Definition:* Cumulative percentage of corpus tokens accounted for by the top N words.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Shows how concentrated word usage is. If top-100 words cover 50% of text, the corpus relies heavily on common words.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Top-100 covering 30-50% is typical. Higher coverage indicates more repetitive text; lower suggests richer vocabulary.
+
+### Word Embedding Metrics
+
+**Isotropy**
+> *Definition:* Measures how uniformly distributed vectors are in the embedding space. Computed as the ratio of minimum to maximum singular values.
+>
+> *Intuition:* High isotropy (near 1.0) means vectors spread evenly in all directions; low isotropy means vectors cluster in certain directions, reducing expressiveness.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Higher isotropy generally indicates better-quality embeddings. Values > 0.1 are reasonable; > 0.3 is good. Lower-dimensional embeddings tend to have higher isotropy.
+
+**Average Norm**
+> *Definition:* Mean magnitude (L2 norm) of word vectors in the embedding space.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Indicates the typical "length" of vectors. Consistent norms suggest stable training; high variance may indicate some words are undertrained.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Relatively consistent norms across models. The absolute value matters less than consistency (low std deviation).
+
+**Cosine Similarity**
+> *Definition:* Measures angular similarity between vectors, ranging from -1 (opposite) to 1 (identical direction).
+>
+> *Intuition:* Words with similar meanings should have high cosine similarity. This is the standard metric for semantic relatedness in embeddings.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Semantically related words should score > 0.5; unrelated words should be near 0. Synonyms often score > 0.7.
+
+**t-SNE Visualization**
+> *Definition:* t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding - a dimensionality reduction technique that preserves local structure for visualization.
+>
+> *Intuition:* Clusters in t-SNE plots indicate groups of semantically related words. Spread indicates vocabulary diversity; tight clusters suggest semantic coherence.
+>
+> *What to seek:* Meaningful clusters (e.g., numbers together, verbs together). Avoid over-interpreting distances - t-SNE preserves local, not global, structure.
+
+### General Interpretation Guidelines
+
+1. **Compare within model families:** Metrics are most meaningful when comparing models of the same type (e.g., 8k vs 64k tokenizer).
+2. **Consider trade-offs:** Better performance on one metric often comes at the cost of another (e.g., compression vs. OOV rate).
+3. **Context matters:** Optimal values depend on downstream tasks. Text generation may prioritize different metrics than classification.
+4. **Corpus influence:** All metrics are influenced by corpus characteristics. Wikipedia text differs from social media or literature.
+5. **Language-specific patterns:** Morphologically rich languages (like Arabic) may show different optimal ranges than analytic languages.
+
+
+### Visualizations Index
+
+| Visualization | Description |
+|---------------|-------------|
+| Tokenizer Compression | Compression ratios by vocabulary size |
+| Tokenizer Fertility | Average token length by vocabulary |
+| Tokenizer OOV | Unknown token rates |
+| Tokenizer Total Tokens | Total tokens by vocabulary |
+| N-gram Perplexity | Perplexity by n-gram size |
+| N-gram Entropy | Entropy by n-gram size |
+| N-gram Coverage | Top pattern coverage |
+| N-gram Unique | Unique n-gram counts |
+| Markov Entropy | Entropy by context size |
+| Markov Branching | Branching factor by context |
+| Markov Contexts | Unique context counts |
+| Zipf's Law | Frequency-rank distribution with fit |
+| Vocab Frequency | Word frequency distribution |
+| Top 20 Words | Most frequent words |
+| Vocab Coverage | Cumulative coverage curve |
+| Embedding Isotropy | Vector space uniformity |
+| Embedding Norms | Vector magnitude distribution |
+| Embedding Similarity | Word similarity heatmap |
+| Nearest Neighbors | Similar words for key terms |
+| t-SNE Words | 2D word embedding visualization |
+| t-SNE Sentences | 2D sentence embedding visualization |
+| Position Encoding | Encoding method comparison |
+| Model Sizes | Storage requirements |
+| Performance Dashboard | Comprehensive performance overview |
+
+---
+## About This Project
+
+### Data Source
+
+Models trained on [wikipedia-monthly](https://huggingface.co/datasets/omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly) - a monthly snapshot of Wikipedia articles across 300+ languages.
+
+### Project
+
+A project by **[Wikilangs](https://wikilangs.org)** - Open-source NLP models for every Wikipedia language.
+
+### Maintainer
+
+[Omar Kamali](https://omarkamali.com) - [Omneity Labs](https://omneitylabs.com)
+
+### Citation
+
+If you use these models in your research, please cite:
+
+```bibtex
+@misc{wikilangs2025,
+  author = {Kamali, Omar},
+  title = {Wikilangs: Open NLP Models for Wikipedia Languages},
+  year = {2025},
+  doi = {10.5281/zenodo.18073153},
+  publisher = {Zenodo},
+  url = {https://huggingface.co/wikilangs}
+  institution = {Omneity Labs}
+}
+```
+
+### License
+
+MIT License - Free for academic and commercial use.
+
+### Links
+
+- 🌐 Website: [wikilangs.org](https://wikilangs.org)
+- 🤗 Models: [huggingface.co/wikilangs](https://huggingface.co/wikilangs)
+- 📊 Data: [wikipedia-monthly](https://huggingface.co/datasets/omarkamali/wikipedia-monthly)
+- 👤 Author: [Omar Kamali](https://huggingface.co/omarkamali)
+- 🤝 Sponsor: [Featherless AI](https://featherless.ai)
+---
+*Generated by Wikilangs Models Pipeline*
+
+*Report Date: 2026-01-11 04:34:19*

models/embeddings/aligned/wo_128d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:3b54fb218a70bdba5a18f30963fa94405b9ee5734c6626432e82345cb6037911
+size 1035060212

models/embeddings/aligned/wo_128d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "wo", "dim": 128, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": true}

models/embeddings/aligned/wo_128d.projection.npy

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:3d196f414315d9c29a31a06e374c7cf58a5cf4f36de8c7fdd53a9466e6ac70e8
+size 65664

models/embeddings/aligned/wo_128d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+{
+  "language": "wo",
+  "dimension": 128,
+  "version": "aligned",
+  "hub_language": "en",
+  "seed_vocab_size": 2421,
+  "vocab_size": 10635
+}

models/embeddings/aligned/wo_32d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:8be1db3b9019ba16d7a95e22ac6a151bd8450091f9d5d2b1e86f28f569afeebf
+size 258892532

models/embeddings/aligned/wo_32d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "wo", "dim": 32, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": true}

models/embeddings/aligned/wo_32d.projection.npy

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:4c98fd39bf67efa58717d41c8f47ca3cc22676d083938201e1c6134aac0a1d6d
+size 4224

models/embeddings/aligned/wo_32d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+{
+  "language": "wo",
+  "dimension": 32,
+  "version": "aligned",
+  "hub_language": "en",
+  "seed_vocab_size": 2421,
+  "vocab_size": 10635
+}

models/embeddings/aligned/wo_64d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:1300764fec2ce010fc09022f1e1c7b996f55b7a79803aa1a5d427e3c721cbe2d
+size 517615092

models/embeddings/aligned/wo_64d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "wo", "dim": 64, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": true}

models/embeddings/aligned/wo_64d.projection.npy

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:55c7953591ef92cec13c72b93f1232a52d7ed907771df2fc03c1294423b7d176
+size 16512

models/embeddings/aligned/wo_64d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+{
+  "language": "wo",
+  "dimension": 64,
+  "version": "aligned",
+  "hub_language": "en",
+  "seed_vocab_size": 2421,
+  "vocab_size": 10635
+}

models/embeddings/monolingual/wo_128d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:3b54fb218a70bdba5a18f30963fa94405b9ee5734c6626432e82345cb6037911
+size 1035060212

models/embeddings/monolingual/wo_128d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "wo", "dim": 128, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": false}

models/embeddings/monolingual/wo_128d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+{
+  "language": "wo",
+  "dimension": 128,
+  "version": "monolingual",
+  "training_params": {
+    "algorithm": "skipgram",
+    "min_count": 5,
+    "window": 5,
+    "negative": 5,
+    "epochs": 5,
+    "encoding_method": "rope",
+    "dim": 128,
+    "threads": 5
+  },
+  "vocab_size": 10635
+}

models/embeddings/monolingual/wo_32d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:8be1db3b9019ba16d7a95e22ac6a151bd8450091f9d5d2b1e86f28f569afeebf
+size 258892532

models/embeddings/monolingual/wo_32d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "wo", "dim": 32, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": false}

models/embeddings/monolingual/wo_32d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+{
+  "language": "wo",
+  "dimension": 32,
+  "version": "monolingual",
+  "training_params": {
+    "algorithm": "skipgram",
+    "min_count": 5,
+    "window": 5,
+    "negative": 5,
+    "epochs": 5,
+    "encoding_method": "rope",
+    "dim": 32,
+    "threads": 5
+  },
+  "vocab_size": 10635
+}

models/embeddings/monolingual/wo_64d.bin

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:1300764fec2ce010fc09022f1e1c7b996f55b7a79803aa1a5d427e3c721cbe2d
+size 517615092

models/embeddings/monolingual/wo_64d.meta.json

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"lang": "wo", "dim": 64, "max_seq_len": 512, "is_aligned": false}

models/embeddings/monolingual/wo_64d_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+{
+  "language": "wo",
+  "dimension": 64,
+  "version": "monolingual",
+  "training_params": {
+    "algorithm": "skipgram",
+    "min_count": 5,
+    "window": 5,
+    "negative": 5,
+    "epochs": 5,
+    "encoding_method": "rope",
+    "dim": 64,
+    "threads": 5
+  },
+  "vocab_size": 10635
+}

models/subword_markov/wo_markov_ctx1_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:b49b97db16db25e6e6d26f8adb134a8ad0ce4ed86aadafa8b49b7d92748c0cd3
+size 49641

models/subword_markov/wo_markov_ctx1_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 1,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "wo",
+  "unique_contexts": 630,
+  "total_transitions": 3499052
+}

models/subword_markov/wo_markov_ctx2_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:6c64c02a948a7f4637b88f0d5df15db826cffd5533da02da0ffab66049f2d2fc
+size 281263

models/subword_markov/wo_markov_ctx2_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 2,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "wo",
+  "unique_contexts": 5840,
+  "total_transitions": 3497561
+}

models/subword_markov/wo_markov_ctx3_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:537f6cd3d2059ef956d1f8ae7dafeb57cb2993ea7373b819975fc4d76a90fdbb
+size 977529

models/subword_markov/wo_markov_ctx3_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 3,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "wo",
+  "unique_contexts": 33559,
+  "total_transitions": 3496070
+}

models/subword_markov/wo_markov_ctx4_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:ff17913565c87d6231148013455f5abd3eb4caa55bbc0ad9b12101ad430f1f77
+size 2594670

models/subword_markov/wo_markov_ctx4_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 4,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "wo",
+  "unique_contexts": 126072,
+  "total_transitions": 3494579
+}

models/subword_ngram/wo_2gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:34fdab01d1381e92408e607b9c0cfc69c2be70d63bfed023eb1479307b587364
+size 34061

models/subword_ngram/wo_2gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 2,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "wo",
+  "unique_ngrams": 2618,
+  "total_ngrams": 3499052
+}

models/subword_ngram/wo_3gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:be7234e9d6284ac2154c091ed43cf733f32ed42b682b857616849bcfd3e3f086
+size 214167

models/subword_ngram/wo_3gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 3,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "wo",
+  "unique_ngrams": 17992,
+  "total_ngrams": 3497561
+}

models/subword_ngram/wo_4gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:9e7c21955b74521ffb59dbe67a76179237a0cc7a007e6c94a821e99f76f55486
+size 895669

models/subword_ngram/wo_4gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 4,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "wo",
+  "unique_ngrams": 78032,
+  "total_ngrams": 3496070
+}

models/subword_ngram/wo_5gram_subword.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:b84537930d9310eda847f273b0e06f2d4a92606c49a21f4620e7991d2efecb08
+size 2084458

models/subword_ngram/wo_5gram_subword_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "n": 5,
+  "variant": "subword",
+  "language": "wo",
+  "unique_ngrams": 182915,
+  "total_ngrams": 3494579
+}

models/tokenizer/wo_tokenizer_16k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:94d91d9a1c8670b80dcc8ea44cb78d112d332c0c0c026339724834b7529352e2
+size 502532

models/tokenizer/wo_tokenizer_32k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:1cdfad0c183accc2741f7e3104abbafbdb1b9d0469c5cbe70541dc9634de7760
+size 783207

models/tokenizer/wo_tokenizer_8k.model

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:fd45100d7b61b2a6a37c7204e047b3f6c36ae4219ffd6a271e5802d946f02990
+size 370579

models/vocabulary/wo_vocabulary.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:07085318b5eb49c0e07ff710e98a086c958c57ae386c6d18c9db99a71f9a045a
+size 348743

models/vocabulary/wo_vocabulary_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+{
+  "language": "wo",
+  "vocabulary_size": 21320,
+  "variant": "full",
+  "statistics": {
+    "type_token_ratio": 0.059032389645416634,
+    "coverage": {
+      "top_100": 0.4492453835356144,
+      "top_1000": 0.7385675279034625,
+      "top_5000": 0.8855613281017517,
+      "top_10000": 0.9302721903111223
+    },
+    "hapax_count": 19347,
+    "hapax_ratio": 0.4757420021147368,
+    "total_documents": 1491
+  }
+}

models/word_markov/wo_markov_ctx1_word.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:7c6783f65b9f4bc6ae3b895800a57ed6d71119d0f5b11a58e2c8a0a4b0c78b42
+size 1633082

models/word_markov/wo_markov_ctx1_word_metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+{
+  "context_size": 1,
+  "variant": "word",
+  "language": "wo",
+  "unique_contexts": 40525,
+  "total_transitions": 687402
+}

models/word_markov/wo_markov_ctx2_word.parquet

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:34170b664b311106f9c631633b04d5669ca98fc991db04b6456d21f1bb8ffac1
+size 4117695