Shubham Agrawal commited on
Commit
18707c5
·
1 Parent(s): c9f1096

fev-bench published: win rate 0.855 (1st), skill score 48.1

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +18 -14
README.md CHANGED
@@ -35,12 +35,15 @@ model-index:
35
  name: fev-bench
36
  type: autogluon/fev_datasets
37
  metrics:
 
 
 
38
  - type: SQL skill score
39
  name: Scaled quantile loss skill score (all 100 tasks)
40
  value: 48.1
41
  source:
42
  name: fev-bench leaderboard
43
- url: https://huggingface.co/spaces/autogluon/fev-bench
44
  - task:
45
  type: time-series-forecasting
46
  dataset:
@@ -67,7 +70,7 @@ Send a batch of series and a horizon, get back nine quantiles (10% to 90%) for e
67
  - Website: https://yhatlabs.com
68
  - Request API access: https://yhatlabs.com/access
69
  - Code, benchmark files and notebooks: https://github.com/yhatlabs/yhatlabs
70
- - Leaderboards: [TIME](https://huggingface.co/spaces/Real-TSF/TIME-leaderboard) · [GIFT-Eval](https://huggingface.co/spaces/Salesforce/GIFT-Eval) (submission under review) · [fev-bench](https://huggingface.co/spaces/autogluon/fev-bench) (submission under review)
71
  - Research configuration (non-commercial): [yhatlabs/ChakraTS-Lab](https://huggingface.co/yhatlabs/ChakraTS-Lab)
72
  - Tabular model: [yhatlabs/ChakraTab](https://huggingface.co/yhatlabs/ChakraTab)
73
 
@@ -134,7 +137,7 @@ Quantiles are monotone in the level. The median (level 0.5) is the point forecas
134
 
135
  ## Evaluation
136
 
137
- *The TIME entry is published on the official leaderboard; the GIFT-Eval and fev-bench submissions are under review, and their numbers below are from our runs of the official protocols.*
138
 
139
  All numbers come from the official benchmark protocols on the full benchmarks, scored against the official seasonal-naive baselines. No benchmark test data is used at any point, and no benchmark training split is used to fit anything.
140
 
@@ -165,19 +168,20 @@ Geometric mean over configurations, relative to seasonal naive; lower is better.
165
  | Chronos-2 | 0.698 | 0.485 |
166
  | TimesFM-2.5 | 0.705 | 0.490 |
167
 
168
- ### fev-bench (100 tasks) — submission under review
169
 
170
- Scaled quantile loss skill score vs seasonal naive; higher is better. The ChakraTS entry is its fev-bench evaluation configuration (`chakra-ts-fev`), which uses no component pretrained on fev-bench data, so no task is flagged for leakage.
171
 
172
- | Model | Skill score |
173
- |---|---|
174
- | **ChakraTS** | **48.1** |
175
- | TimesFM-3 (non-commercial) | 48.7 |
176
- | Chronos-2 | 47.3 |
177
- | TimesFM-2.5 | 42.2 (leaderboard figure, after its leakage replacement) |
178
- | T0-beta | 46.7 |
179
- | TiRex-2 | 45.5 |
180
- | Toto-2.0-2.5B | 44.4 |
 
181
 
182
  Per-task result files and the evaluation notebooks are in the [GitHub repository](https://github.com/yhatlabs/yhatlabs).
183
 
 
35
  name: fev-bench
36
  type: autogluon/fev_datasets
37
  metrics:
38
+ - type: win rate
39
+ name: Win rate (all 100 tasks)
40
+ value: 0.855
41
  - type: SQL skill score
42
  name: Scaled quantile loss skill score (all 100 tasks)
43
  value: 48.1
44
  source:
45
  name: fev-bench leaderboard
46
+ url: https://huggingface.co/spaces/autogluon/fev-leaderboard
47
  - task:
48
  type: time-series-forecasting
49
  dataset:
 
70
  - Website: https://yhatlabs.com
71
  - Request API access: https://yhatlabs.com/access
72
  - Code, benchmark files and notebooks: https://github.com/yhatlabs/yhatlabs
73
+ - Leaderboards: [TIME](https://huggingface.co/spaces/Real-TSF/TIME-leaderboard) · [GIFT-Eval](https://huggingface.co/spaces/Salesforce/GIFT-Eval) (submission under review) · [fev-bench](https://huggingface.co/spaces/autogluon/fev-leaderboard)
74
  - Research configuration (non-commercial): [yhatlabs/ChakraTS-Lab](https://huggingface.co/yhatlabs/ChakraTS-Lab)
75
  - Tabular model: [yhatlabs/ChakraTab](https://huggingface.co/yhatlabs/ChakraTab)
76
 
 
137
 
138
  ## Evaluation
139
 
140
+ *The TIME and fev-bench entries are published on the official leaderboards; the GIFT-Eval submission is under review, and its numbers below are from our run of the official protocol.*
141
 
142
  All numbers come from the official benchmark protocols on the full benchmarks, scored against the official seasonal-naive baselines. No benchmark test data is used at any point, and no benchmark training split is used to fit anything.
143
 
 
168
  | Chronos-2 | 0.698 | 0.485 |
169
  | TimesFM-2.5 | 0.705 | 0.490 |
170
 
171
+ ### fev-bench (100 tasks) — published
172
 
173
+ [fev-bench](https://huggingface.co/spaces/autogluon/fev-leaderboard) ranks models by win rate (how often a model beats each other model across the 100 tasks) and reports the scaled quantile loss skill score vs seasonal naive; higher is better for both. The ChakraTS entry is its fev-bench evaluation configuration (`chakra-ts-fev`), which uses no component pretrained on fev-bench data, so no task is flagged for leakage. Rows are the official leaderboard at merge time (October 2026, [PR #192](https://github.com/autogluon/fev/pull/192)).
174
 
175
+ | Model | Win rate | Skill score |
176
+ |---|---|---|
177
+ | **ChakraTS** | **0.855** | **48.1** |
178
+ | TimesFM-3 (non-commercial) | 0.849 | 49.0 |
179
+ | Lingjiang 2.0 | 0.816 | 47.0 |
180
+ | Chronos-2 | 0.778 | 47.3 |
181
+ | T0-beta | 0.752 | 46.7 |
182
+ | Toto-2.0-2.5B | 0.745 | 44.4 |
183
+ | TiRex-2 | 0.741 | 45.5 |
184
+ | TimesFM-2.5 | 0.678 | 46.7 (leaderboard figure, after its leakage replacement) |
185
 
186
  Per-task result files and the evaluation notebooks are in the [GitHub repository](https://github.com/yhatlabs/yhatlabs).
187