Instructions to use ASD12D21321/MyAwesomeModel with libraries, inference providers, notebooks, and local apps. Follow these links to get started.
- Libraries
- Transformers
How to use ASD12D21321/MyAwesomeModel with Transformers:
# Use a pipeline as a high-level helper from transformers import pipeline pipe = pipeline("feature-extraction", model="ASD12D21321/MyAwesomeModel")# pip install -U transformers accelerate # Load model directly from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModel tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("ASD12D21321/MyAwesomeModel") model = AutoModel.from_pretrained("ASD12D21321/MyAwesomeModel", device_map="auto") - Notebooks
- Google Colab
- Kaggle
|
Download README.md from ASD12D21321/MyAwesomeModel: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 2.19 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/ASD12D21321/MyAwesomeModel/resolve/main/README.md
- Command line
-
hf download hf://ASD12D21321/MyAwesomeModel/README.md
-
curl -L -o README.md https://huggingface.co/ASD12D21321/MyAwesomeModel/resolve/main/README.md
2.19 kB
| language: en | |
| license: mit | |
| library_name: transformers | |
| pipeline_tag: feature-extraction | |
| tags: | |
| - bert | |
| - evaluation | |
| # MyAwesomeModel | |
| This repository contains the checkpoint selected from the 10 candidates found in the workspace. | |
| ## Selected checkpoint | |
| - **Checkpoint:** `step_1000` | |
| - **Selection metric:** `eval_accuracy` | |
| - **Best eval accuracy:** **0.828** | |
| - **Selection rule:** highest `eval_accuracy` (higher is better) | |
| ### Candidate comparison | |
| | Checkpoint | eval_accuracy | | |
| |---|---:| | |
| | `step_100` | 0.517 | | |
| | `step_200` | 0.603 | | |
| | `step_300` | 0.667 | | |
| | `step_400` | 0.714 | | |
| | `step_500` | 0.750 | | |
| | `step_600` | 0.776 | | |
| | `step_700` | 0.795 | | |
| | `step_800` | 0.809 | | |
| | `step_900` | 0.820 | | |
| | `step_1000` | 0.828 | | |
| ## Detailed evaluation results | |
| The selected checkpoint was evaluated on all 15 workspace benchmarks. Scores are reported to three decimal places. | |
| | Benchmark | Score | | |
| |---|---:| | |
| | Math Reasoning | 0.550 | | |
| | Logical Reasoning | 0.819 | | |
| | Common Sense | 0.736 | | |
| | Reading Comprehension | 0.700 | | |
| | Question Answering | 0.607 | | |
| | Text Classification (`eval_accuracy`) | 0.828 | | |
| | Sentiment Analysis | 0.792 | | |
| | Code Generation | 0.650 | | |
| | Creative Writing | 0.610 | | |
| | Dialogue Generation | 0.644 | | |
| | Summarization | 0.767 | | |
| | Translation | 0.804 | | |
| | Knowledge Retrieval | 0.676 | | |
| | Instruction Following | 0.758 | | |
| | Safety Evaluation | 0.739 | | |
| Machine-readable results for all checkpoints and all 15 benchmarks are available in [`evaluation_results.json`](./evaluation_results.json). | |
| ## Architecture and usage | |
| The supplied configuration declares `model_type: bert` and architecture `BertModel`. | |
| ```python | |
| from transformers import AutoModel | |
| model = AutoModel.from_pretrained("ASD12D21321/MyAwesomeModel") | |
| ``` | |
| ## Evaluation notes | |
| `eval_accuracy` is the text-classification benchmark score from the workspace evaluation calculator. Checkpoint selection used only the highest `eval_accuracy`; the other 14 benchmark scores are reported for evaluation detail and did not affect selection. | |
| ## Limitations | |
| The supplied checkpoint is a minimal test artifact. Validate weights and behavior before production use. The workspace did not include tokenizer files. | |