AbstractPhil's picture
Night-2 seed-1 amendments: exp006 promoted 2-SEED CONFIRMED; exp007 falsifier robust across seeds
fcf7ccc verified
|
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
3.08 kB

exp007_amoe_lora β€” AMoE-LoRA v1: the first dispatch test (CANDIDATE, s0)

Question. Does a bank of experts under dense signed aleph dispatch (keyed on hidden state + sigma) beat a parameter-matched monolith on the certified core-epred substrate? First MoE-structure experiment of the line.

Structure per site (16 sites). A=4 zero-init rank-8 low-rank residual experts; dispatch = dense SIGNED aleph coefficients per token (sinh/cosh over A oriented axes β€” no softmax gate, no top-k, no balance loss; usage read-only) with sigma Fourier features added to the dispatch key (the exp003 finding: sigma is the live register axis). Combine: x + Ξ£ Οƒ(gate_k)Β·w_k(x,Οƒ)Β·Ξ”_k(x). Falsifier: one rank-32 delta per site, same placement, no dispatch (the matched-monolith control). 3000 steps each, batch 16, pure Adam wd=0.

Results (results.json):

arm trainable val eps-MSE Ξ” vs frozen
frozen 0 0.124788 β€”
amoe A4r8 899,392 0.122015 βˆ’2.2%
monolith r32 811,216 0.121777 βˆ’2.4%
prereg outcome
P1 bank β‰₯ monolith MISS (monolith wins by 0.0002 with 11% fewer params)
P2 sigma-band usage differentiation MISS β€” spread 0.0009; usage β‰ˆ [0.25, 0.17, 0.33, 0.24] in EVERY band
P3 toggle bit-exact post-train HIT (≑ frozen to full precision)
P4 no dead experts HIT (all four alive, 0.17–0.33)

Verdict (the falsifier did its job). Under UNIFORM training pressure β€” one dataset, one objective, one register β€” dispatch pays nothing over a single matched-width delta, and the sigma-keyed dispatch never uses its sigma freedom. This reproduces the text line's Tree-1b/exp009 law on a diffusion trunk: specialization requires differentiated pressure; the aggregation channel alone doesn't create it. The experts blended (uniform usage) exactly as the two-regime law predicts for register-distance-zero mixtures.

What it buys the program. The machinery is sound (parity, liveness, signed dense dispatch all green) and per-param the bank units are efficient (βˆ’2.2% at 0.9M vs the relay's βˆ’2.5% at 3.2M). The next MoE test must IMPOSE structure rather than hope dispatch discovers it in uniform data β€” the designed follow-on is the step-gated controller: experts ASSIGNED to sigma bands with per-band loss masking (coarse-to-fine), judged against this same monolith. Subject-bucketed expert assignment is the second axis (needs the richer fused datasets; this synthetic set's subject buckets max out at nβ‰ˆ6).

Caveats. Single seed; 3k steps; A=4/r=8 single scale point; param match 1.109 (bank heavier β€” disclosed); one substrate. Cost β‰ˆ 3.0 GPU-h. Checkpoints: amoe_core_s0.pt, mono_core_s0.pt.


SEED-1 REPLICATION (2026-07-17, results_s1.json) β€” FALSIFIER ROBUST, 2 SEEDS

monolith 0.121799 vs amoe 0.122011 (s0: 0.121777 vs 0.122015) β€” the monolith ties/wins in BOTH seeds; band-usage spread stays flat (0.0039 vs 0.0009). Uniform-pressure β‡’ dispatch-pays-nothing is seed-robust at this scale.