Please remove the misleading benchmarks

#5
by linuxid10t - opened

If you are going to publish a "preview" checkpoint, do not use the benchmarks from the full, finished version. This is highly misleading. Better yet, just publish the weights from the release version. I understand that is a business decision, but it would be far better for the community to just publish the real deal and keep the pro model proprietary.

the benchmarks are for the preview version it seems, but it is noticeably worse than the final checkpoint

  • GPQA Diamond: 85.1 vs 92.4
  • SciCode: 38.1 vs 51.6
  • AA-Omniscience: 23 vs 25
  • AA-LCR: 68.3 vs 81

and $0.005/0.05/0.15 is crazy economics for a 30B dense model. i don't think Agnes 3.0 Flash and Flash Preview are the same model.

its a dense?? i thought it was a MoE

Sign up or log in to comment