Add comprehensive model card for E2Rank
#1
by
nielsr
HF Staff
- opened
README.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
---
|
| 2 |
+
license: apache-2.0
|
| 3 |
+
library_name: transformers
|
| 4 |
+
pipeline_tag: feature-extraction
|
| 5 |
+
---
|
| 6 |
+
|
| 7 |
+
# E2Rank: Your Text Embedding can Also be an Effective and Efficient Listwise Reranker
|
| 8 |
+
|
| 9 |
+
We introduce $\textrm{E}^2\text{Rank}$, meaning **E**fficient **E**mbedding-based **Rank**ing (also meaning **Embedding-to-Rank**), which extends a single text embedding model to perform both high-quality retrieval and listwise reranking, thereby achieving strong effectiveness with remarkable efficiency.
|
| 10 |
+
|
| 11 |
+
This model is presented in the paper: [$\text{E}^2\text{Rank}$: Your Text Embedding can Also be an Effective and Efficient Listwise Reranker](https://huggingface.co/papers/2510.22733).
|
| 12 |
+
|
| 13 |
+
**Project Page**: https://alibaba-nlp.github.io/E2Rank/
|
| 14 |
+
**Code**: https://github.com/Alibaba-NLP/E2Rank
|
| 15 |
+
|
| 16 |
+
<div align="center">
|
| 17 |
+
<img src="https://github.com/Alibaba-NLP/E2Rank/raw/main/assets/cover.png" width="90%" height="auto" />
|
| 18 |
+
<p style="width: 70%; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto">
|
| 19 |
+
<b>(a)</b> Overview of E2Rank. <b>(b)</b> Average reranking performance on the BEIR benchmark, E2Rank outperforms other baselines. <b>(c)</b> Reranking latency per query on the Covid dataset, E2Rank can achieve several times the acceleration compared with RankQwen3.
|
| 20 |
+
</p>
|
| 21 |
+
</div>
|
| 22 |
+
|
| 23 |
+
## Introduction
|
| 24 |
+
|
| 25 |
+
We introduce $\textrm{E}^2\text{Rank}$,
|
| 26 |
+
meaning **E**fficient **E**mbedding-based **Rank**ing
|
| 27 |
+
(also meaning **Embedding-to-Rank**),
|
| 28 |
+
which extends a single text embedding model
|
| 29 |
+
to perform both high-quality retrieval and listwise reranking,
|
| 30 |
+
thereby achieving strong effectiveness with remarkable efficiency.
|
| 31 |
+
|
| 32 |
+
By applying cosine similarity between the query and
|
| 33 |
+
document embeddings as a unified ranking function, the listwise ranking prompt,
|
| 34 |
+
which is constructed from the original query and its candidate documents, serves
|
| 35 |
+
as an enhanced query enriched with signals from the top-K documents, akin to
|
| 36 |
+
pseudo-relevance feedback (PRF) in traditional retrieval models. This design
|
| 37 |
+
preserves the efficiency and representational quality of the base embedding model
|
| 38 |
+
while significantly improving its reranking performance.
|
| 39 |
+
|
| 40 |
+
Empirically, E2Rank achieves state-of-the-art results on the BEIR reranking benchmark
|
| 41 |
+
and demonstrates competitive performance on the reasoning-intensive BRIGHT benchmark,
|
| 42 |
+
with very low reranking latency. We also show that the ranking training process
|
| 43 |
+
improves embedding performance on the MTEB benchmark.
|
| 44 |
+
Our findings indicate that a single embedding model can effectively unify retrieval and reranking,
|
| 45 |
+
offering both computational efficiency and competitive ranking accuracy.
|
| 46 |
+
|
| 47 |
+
Our work highlights the potential of single embedding models to serve as unified retrieval-reranking engines, offering a practical, efficient, and accurate alternative to complex multi-stage ranking systems.
|
| 48 |
+
|
| 49 |
+
## Abstract
|
| 50 |
+
|
| 51 |
+
Text embedding models serve as a fundamental component in real-world search applications. By mapping queries and documents into a shared embedding space, they deliver competitive retrieval performance with high efficiency. However, their ranking fidelity remains limited compared to dedicated rerankers, especially recent LLM-based listwise rerankers, which capture fine-grained query-document and document-document interactions. In this paper, we propose a simple yet effective unified framework $\text{E}^2\text{Rank}$, means Efficient Embedding-based Ranking (also means Embedding-to-Rank), which extends a single text embedding model to perform both high-quality retrieval and listwise reranking through continued training under a listwise ranking objective, thereby achieving strong effectiveness with remarkable efficiency. By applying cosine similarity between the query and document embeddings as a unified ranking function, the listwise ranking prompt, which is constructed from the original query and its candidate documents, serves as an enhanced query enriched with signals from the top-K documents, akin to pseudo-relevance feedback (PRF) in traditional retrieval models. This design preserves the efficiency and representational quality of the base embedding model while significantly improving its reranking performance. Empirically, $\textrm{E}^2\text{Rank}$ achieves state-of-the-art results on the BEIR reranking benchmark and demonstrates competitive performance on the reasoning-intensive BRIGHT benchmark, with very low reranking latency. We also show that the ranking training process improves embedding performance on the MTEB benchmark. Our findings indicate that a single embedding model can effectively unify retrieval and reranking, offering both computational efficiency and competitive ranking accuracy.
|
| 52 |
+
|
| 53 |
+
## Usage
|
| 54 |
+
|
| 55 |
+
### Embedding Model
|
| 56 |
+
|
| 57 |
+
The usage of E2Rank as an embedding model is similar to [Qwen3-Embedding](https://github.com/QwenLM/Qwen3-Embedding). The only difference is that Qwen3-Embedding will automatically append an EOS token, while E2Rank requires users to manually append the special token `<|endoftext|>` at the end of each input text.
|
| 58 |
+
|
| 59 |
+
The following code demonstrates how to use `Alibaba-NLP/E2Rank-0.6B` (or other E2Rank models) with the Hugging Face `transformers` library to obtain embeddings.
|
| 60 |
+
|
| 61 |
+
```python
|
| 62 |
+
# Requires transformers>=4.51.0
|
| 63 |
+
import torch
|
| 64 |
+
import torch.nn.functional as F
|
| 65 |
+
|
| 66 |
+
from torch import Tensor
|
| 67 |
+
from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModel
|
| 68 |
+
|
| 69 |
+
|
| 70 |
+
def last_token_pool(last_hidden_states: Tensor, attention_mask: Tensor) -> Tensor:
|
| 71 |
+
left_padding = (attention_mask[:, -1].sum() == attention_mask.shape[0])
|
| 72 |
+
if left_padding:
|
| 73 |
+
return last_hidden_states[:, -1]
|
| 74 |
+
else:
|
| 75 |
+
sequence_lengths = attention_mask.sum(dim=1) - 1
|
| 76 |
+
batch_size = last_hidden_states.shape[0]
|
| 77 |
+
return last_hidden_states[torch.arange(batch_size, device=last_hidden_states.device), sequence_lengths]
|
| 78 |
+
|
| 79 |
+
|
| 80 |
+
def get_detailed_instruct(task_description: str, query: str) -> str:
|
| 81 |
+
return f'Instruct: {task_description}\
|
| 82 |
+
Query:{query}'
|
| 83 |
+
|
| 84 |
+
# Each query must come with a one-sentence instruction that describes the task
|
| 85 |
+
task = 'Given a web search query, retrieve relevant passages that answer the query'
|
| 86 |
+
|
| 87 |
+
queries = [
|
| 88 |
+
get_detailed_instruct(task, 'What is the capital of China?'),
|
| 89 |
+
get_detailed_instruct(task, 'Explain gravity')
|
| 90 |
+
]
|
| 91 |
+
# No need to add instruction for retrieval documents
|
| 92 |
+
documents = [
|
| 93 |
+
"The capital of China is Beijing.",
|
| 94 |
+
"Gravity is a force that attracts two bodies towards each other. It gives weight to physical objects and is responsible for the movement of planets around the sun."
|
| 95 |
+
]
|
| 96 |
+
input_texts = queries + documents
|
| 97 |
+
input_texts = [t + "<|endoftext|>" for t in input_texts]
|
| 98 |
+
|
| 99 |
+
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained('Alibaba-NLP/E2Rank-0.6B', padding_side='left')
|
| 100 |
+
model = AutoModel.from_pretrained('Alibaba-NLP/E2Rank-0.6B')
|
| 101 |
+
|
| 102 |
+
max_length = 8192
|
| 103 |
+
|
| 104 |
+
# Tokenize the input texts
|
| 105 |
+
batch_dict = tokenizer(
|
| 106 |
+
input_texts,
|
| 107 |
+
padding=True,
|
| 108 |
+
truncation=True,
|
| 109 |
+
max_length=max_length,
|
| 110 |
+
return_tensors="pt",
|
| 111 |
+
)
|
| 112 |
+
batch_dict.to(model.device)
|
| 113 |
+
with torch.no_grad():
|
| 114 |
+
outputs = model(**batch_dict)
|
| 115 |
+
embeddings = last_token_pool(outputs.last_hidden_state, batch_dict['attention_mask'])
|
| 116 |
+
|
| 117 |
+
# normalize embeddings
|
| 118 |
+
embeddings = F.normalize(embeddings, p=2, dim=1)
|
| 119 |
+
scores = (embeddings[:2] @ embeddings[2:].T)
|
| 120 |
+
|
| 121 |
+
print(scores.tolist())
|
| 122 |
+
# [[0.5950675010681152, 0.030417663976550102], [0.061970409005880356, 0.562691330909729]]
|
| 123 |
+
```
|
| 124 |
+
|
| 125 |
+
## Citation
|
| 126 |
+
|
| 127 |
+
If this work is helpful, please kindly cite as:
|
| 128 |
+
|
| 129 |
+
```bibtext
|
| 130 |
+
@misc{liu2025e2rank,
|
| 131 |
+
title={E2Rank: Your Text Embedding can Also be an Effective and Efficient Listwise Reranker},
|
| 132 |
+
author={Qi Liu and Yanzhao Zhang and Mingxin Li and Dingkun Long and Pengjun Xie and Jiaxin Mao},
|
| 133 |
+
year={2025},
|
| 134 |
+
eprint={2510.22733},
|
| 135 |
+
archivePrefix={arXiv},
|
| 136 |
+
primaryClass={cs.CL},
|
| 137 |
+
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.22733},
|
| 138 |
+
}
|
| 139 |
+
```
|