YOLO26n performance review
Measured revisions
| Reference | Current | |
|---|---|---|
| Source revision | <commit> |
<commit> |
| Model manifest SHA-256 | <sha256> |
<sha256> |
| Runtime library SHA-256 | <sha256> |
<sha256> |
| Dataset name | <dataset> |
<dataset> |
| Dataset source-tree identity | <identity> |
<identity> |
| Dataset configuration SHA-256 | <sha256> |
<sha256> |
| Dataset images | <count> |
<count> |
| Dataset instances | <count> |
<count> |
| Ultralytics arguments | <arguments> |
<arguments> |
Ultralytics results
| Measurement | Reference | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Precision | <value> |
<value> |
| Recall | <value> |
<value> |
| mAP50 | <value> |
<value> |
| mAP50-95 | <value> |
<value> |
| Preprocess | <milliseconds> |
<milliseconds> |
| Inference | <milliseconds> |
<milliseconds> |
| Postprocess | <milliseconds> |
<milliseconds> |
- Reference evidence:
<path or link> - Current evidence:
<path or link>
Measurement context
Summarize conditions that materially help interpret the comparison, including
throttling, temperature, available memory, filesystem cache, major page faults,
and swap activity. Link to both results.json files for the complete record.
Review
State whether the observed accuracy and performance are acceptable for this change, including any qualifications.