| --- |
| datasets: |
| - codeparrot/github-code |
| - Geralt-Targaryen/openwebmath |
| - HuggingFaceFW/fineweb-edu |
| language: |
| - en |
| pipeline_tag: text-generation |
| tags: |
| - custom-architecture |
| - mixture-of-experts |
| - mla |
| - muon |
| - code |
| --- |
| # CodeMind-1B-v0.1 |
|
|
| [](https://github.com/B4K2/codemind) |
|
|
|
|
| > A research-focused Small Language Model (SLM) combining **DeepSeek-style MLA + MoE**, **Kimi Attention Residuals**, and the **Muon optimizer** into a single custom architecture trained from scratch on consumer-grade hardware. |
|
|
| --- |
|
|
| ## Overview |
|
|
| CodeMind-1B is an experimental, coding-focused SLM designed to explore the next generation of efficient transformer architectures. Unlike standard LLaMA/Mistral derivatives, CodeMind is built around a fully custom stack developed from scratch. |
|
|
| This release is the **Base Pre-training Checkpoint**. It was trained to validate architecture stability, optimizer behavior, and sparse routing efficiency on a single NVIDIA A40 GPU. |
|
|
|
|
| ## Architecture Highlights |
|
|
| ### Multi-Head Latent Attention (MLA) |
| DeepSeek-style KV compression using latent-space attention reconstruction. |
| * **Benefits:** Massive KV-cache reduction, inherently long-context friendly, lower VRAM usage, and superior inference scaling. |
|
|
| ### Mixture of Experts (MoE) |
| Fine-grained routed experts designed for sparse, efficient compute. |
| * **Spec:** 4 routed experts (Top-2 routing) + 1 always-active shared expert. |
| * **Routing:** Auxiliary-free load balancing (updates via backward pass instead of manual bias adjustments). |
|
|
| ### Kimi Attention Residuals (AttnRes) |
| Replacing standard additive residuals (`x = x + f(x)`), CodeMind uses attention-based residual aggregation inspired by Moonshot AI's Kimi architecture. |
| * **Benefits:** Improved gradient flow, better deep-layer information retention, and higher compute efficiency via block-level pooling. |
|
|
| ### Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) |
| The model predicts multiple future tokens simultaneously during training. |
| * **Benefits:** Better algorithmic planning behavior, stronger token representations, and the foundation for speculative decoding. |
|
|
| ### Hybrid Muon Optimizer |
| * **Weight Matrices (2D):** `Muon` (Newton-Schulz orthogonalization for extremely fast convergence). |
| * **Embeddings / Norms (1D):** `AdamW` (For stable positional tracking). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ## Training Details & Dataset |
|
|
| | Specification | Details | |
| | :--- | :--- | |
| | **Parameters** | ~1B Total / ~400M Active (Per Token) | |
| | **Hardware** | 1× NVIDIA A40 (48GB VRAM) | |
| | **Training Time** | ~21 Hours | |
| | **Tokens Seen** | 147 Million | |
| | **Precision** | `bfloat16` | |
| | **Optimizer** | Muon (lr=0.01) + AdamW (lr=3e-4) | |
| | **Objective** | Next Token Prediction (NTP) + MTP + Z-Loss | |
|
|
| ### Dataset Mix |
| Trained on a carefully curated subset of domains: |
| * **60% Code:** GitHub Python (Teaching coding syntax and structure) |
| * **15% Math:** OpenWebMath (Teaching logical reasoning) |
| * **25% General:** FineWeb-Edu (Teaching general language and knowledge) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ## Training Metrics |
|
|
| The model demonstrated textbook convergence across all custom objectives without divergence, proving the stability of the hybrid optimizer and custom architecture. |
|
|
| **Training Loss & Tokens Seen** |
|  |
|  |
|
|
| **MTP & Load Balancing Loss** |
|  |
|  |
|
|
| **Z-Loss & Muon Learning Rate** |
|  |
|  |
|
|
| * **Initial Loss:** ~10.5 ➔ **Final Loss:** ~3.1 |
| * **MoE Load Balancing:** Stable at ~0.35, proving experts are actively sharing the workload. |
| * **Throughput:** Sustained ~1,940 Tok/s on a single A40. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ## Current Capabilities & Limitations |
|
|
| **This Model can:** |
| - Generate valid Python syntax and complete basic functions. |
| - Understand indentation, classes, and structure. |
| - Follow standard code patterns. |
|
|
| **This checkpoint cannot:** |
| - Perform robust logic (147M tokens is enough for syntax, not reasoning). |
| - Answer conversational questions (It is not Instruction Tuned). |
| - Avoid hallucinations on complex algorithms. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ## How to Load the Model |
|
|
| Because CodeMind uses a heavily customized architecture, it **cannot** be loaded via standard Hugging Face `AutoModel` classes. You must use the repository source code directly. |
|
|
|
|
| ```python |
| import torch |
| from safetensors.torch import load_file |
| from config.model_config import CodeMindConfig |
| from tokenizer.tokenizer import CodeMindTokenizer |
| from model.codemind import CodeMindSLM |
| |
| # 1. Initialize config and tokenizer |
| config = CodeMindConfig() |
| tokenizer = CodeMindTokenizer() |
| |
| # 2. Build the architecture |
| model = CodeMindSLM(config).to("cuda").to(torch.bfloat16) |
| |
| # 3. Load weights |
| state_dict = load_file("model.safetensors") |
| |
| # 4. Remove torch.compile prefixes if present |
| cleaned_dict = { |
| k.replace("_orig_mod.", ""): v |
| for k, v in state_dict.items() |
| } |
| |
| model.load_state_dict(cleaned_dict, strict=False) |
| print("✅ CodeMind loaded successfully!") |
| ``` |
|
|
| ## Acknowledgements & References |
|
|
| This architecture was built entirely from scratch, drawing heavy inspiration from the following groundbreaking papers: |
|
|
| 1. [DeepSeek-V4 Technical Report](https://huggingface.co/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Pro/blob/main/DeepSeek_V4.pdf) |
| 2. [DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.19437) |
| 3. [Attention Residuals (Moonshot AI / Kimi)](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.15031) |
| 4. [Muon Optimizer Scalability](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2502.16982) |