re The "Camera" Fix
I find the same is true for drones. When describing a scene with a 'drone view of...' the resulting image has a drone in the image.
Good catch. This has been fixed in V2.5+ - I got rid of the camera specification in the output entirely - it will now render top down drone shot images when asked. It wasn't trained on "drone" nomenclature, so 'birds eye view perspective' is more consistent if you are looking for an aerial shot!
You can system prompt around the camera/drone/lighting glitch with a negative constraint with positive constraint alternative, eg.
'Never include the camera/drone/light device itself, studio lights or stands, camera body, propellers, or quadcopter body within the frame, nor any text or camera model names referencing specific drone brands like DJI in your output. Use positive constraints to describe the aesthetic produced from the camera/drone/lighting like 'birds-eye view,' 'high-altitude aerial,' 'top-down perspective,' or 'soft studio illumination,' to ensure the model focuses on the visual style and angle rather than rendering the hardware.'