sentence-transformers How to use Chandar/sv-subject-based-all-MiniLM-L6-v2 with sentence-transformers:
from sentence_transformers import SentenceTransformer
model = SentenceTransformer("Chandar/sv-subject-based-all-MiniLM-L6-v2")
sentences = [
"with\tthe\torigin\tof\tthe\tcoal\tformed\tduring\tthe\tcarboniferous\tepoch,\ttwo\tor\tthree\nconsiderations\tsuggest\tthemselves.\nIn\tthe\tfirst\tplace,\tthe\tgreat\tphantom\tof\tgeological\ttime\trises\tbefore\tthe\tstudent\tof\nthis,\tas\tof\tall\tother,\tfragments\tof\tthe\thistory\tof\tour\tearth—\tspringing\nirrepressibly\tout\tof\tthe\tfacts,\tlike\tthe\tDjin\tfrom\tthe\tjar\twhich\tthe\tfishermen\tso\nincautiously\topened;\tand\tlike\tthe\tDjin\tagain,\tbeing\tvaporous,\tshifting,\tand\nindefinable,\tbut\tunmistakably\tgigantic.\tHowever\tmodest\tthe\tbases\tof\tone's\ncalculation\tmay\tbe,\tthe\tminimum\tof\ttime\tassignable\tto\tthe\tcoal\tperiod\tremains\nsomething\tstupendous.\nPrincipal\tDawson\tis\tthe\tlast\tperson\tlikely\tto\tbe\tguilty\tof\texaggeration\tin\tthis\nmatter,\tand\tit\twill\tbe\twell\tto\tconsider\twhat\the\thas\tto\tsay\tabout\tit:—\n\"The\trate\tof\taccumulation\tof\tcoal\twas\tvery\tslow.\tThe\tclimate\tof\tthe\tperiod,\tin\nthe\tnorthern\ttemperate\tzone,\twas\tof\tsuch\ta\tcharacter\tthat\tthe\ttrue\tconifers\tshow\nrings\tof\tgrowth,\tnot\tlarger,\tnor\tmuch\tless\tdistinct,\tthan\tthose\tof\tmany\tof\ttheir\nmodern\tcongeners.\tThe\t\nSigillarioe\n\tand\t\nCalamites\n\twere\tnot,\tas\toften\tsupposed,\ncomposed\twholly,\tor\teven\tprincipally,\tof\tlax\tand\tsoft\ttissues,\tor\tnecessarily\nshort-lived.\tThe\tformer\thad,\tit\tis\ttrue,\ta\tvery\tthick\tinner\tbark;\tbut\ttheir\tdense\nwoody\taxis,\ttheir\tthick\tand\tnearly\timperishable\touter\tbark,\tand\ttheir\tscanty\tand\nrigid\tfoliage,\twould\tindicate\tno\tvery\trapid\tgrowth\tor\tdecay.\tIn\tthe\tcase\tof\tthe\nSigillarioe\n,\tthe\tvariations\tin\tthe\tleaf-scars\tin\tdifferent\tparts\tof\tthe\ttrunk,\tthe\nintercalation\tof\tnew\tridges\tat\tthe\tsurface\trepresenting\tthat\tof\tnew\twoody\twedges\nin\tthe\taxis,\tthe\ttransverse\tmarks\tleft\tby\tthe\tstages\tof\tupward\tgrowth,\tall\tindicate\nthat\tseveral\tyears\tmust\thave\tbeen\trequired\tfor\tthe\tgrowth\tof\tstems\tof\tmoderate\nsize.\tThe\tenormous\troots\tof\tthese\ttrees,\tand\tthe\tcondition\tof\tthe\tcoal-swamps,\nmust\thave\texempted\tthem\tfrom\tthe\tdanger\tof\tbeing\toverthrown\tby\tviolence.\nThey\tprobably\tfell\tin\tsuccessive\tgenerations\tfrom\tnatural\tdecay;\tand\tmaking\nevery\tallowance\tfor\tother\tmaterials,\twe\tmay\tsafely\tassert\tthat\tevery\tfoot\tof\nthickness\tof\tpure\tbituminous\tcoal\timplies\tthe\tquiet\tgrowth\tand\tfall\tof\tat\tleast\nfifty\tgenerations\tof\t\nSigillarioe\n,\tand\ttherefore\tan\tundisturbed\tcondition\tof\tforest\ngrowth\tenduring\tthrough\tmany\tcenturies.\tFurther,\tthere\tis\tevidence\tthat\tan\nimmense\tamount\tof\tloose\tparenchymatous\ttissue,\tand\teven\tof\twood,\tperished\tby\ndecay,\tand\twe\tdo\tnot\tknow\tto\twhat\textent\teven\tthe\tmost\tdurable\ttissues\tmay\nhave\tdisappeared\tin\tthis\tway;\tso\tthat,\tin\tmany\tcoal-seams,\twe\tmay\thave\tonly\ta\nvery\tsmall\tpart\tof\tthe\tvegetable\tmatter\tproduced.\"\nUndoubtedly\tthe\tforce\tof\tthese\treflections\tis\tnot\tdiminished\twhen\tthe",
"Quantum Statistics 187\n0\n1\n2\n3\n¯n\n−2 −1 0123\nα+βϵ\nFigure 8.1: A comparison of the Bose-Einstein (solid curve), Maxwell-Boltzmann (dashed curve),\nand Fermi-Dirac (dash-dotted curve) distributions.\nFinally, the partition function of the gas is given by\nln Z =αN ±\n∑\nr\nln\n(\n1 ±e−α−βϵr\n)\n. (8.58)\nLet us investigate the magnitude ofαin some important limiting cases. Consider, first of all,\nthe case of a gas at a given temperature when its concentration is made sufficiently low: that is,\nwhen N is made sufficiently small. The relation (8.57) can only be satisfied if each term in the\nsum over states is made sufficiently small; that is, if ¯nr ≪1o rα+βϵr ≫1 for all statesr.( S e e\nFigure 8.1.)\nConsider, next, the case of a gas made up of a fixed number of particles when its temperature is\nmade sufficiently large. That is, whenβis made sufficiently small. In the sum in Equation (8.57),\nthe terms of appreciable magnitude are those for whichα+βϵr <1. (See Figure 8.1.) Thus, it\nfollows that asβ→0 an increasing number of terms with large values ofϵr contribute substantially\nto this sum. In order to prevent the sum from exceedingN, the parameterαmust become large\nenough that each term is made sufficiently small: that is, it is again necessary that ¯nr ≪1o r\nα+βϵr ≫1 for all statesr.\nThe previous discussion suggests that if theconcentration of an ideal gas is made sufficiently\nlow, or the temperature is made sufficiently high, thenαmust become so large that\nexp(α+βϵr) ≫1 (8.59)\nfor allr. Equivalently, this means that the number of particles occupying each quantum state must\nbecome so small that\n¯nr ≪1 (8.60)",
"myriads\tas\tto\tstain\tthe\tberg\tand\tthe\tpack\tice\twherever\tthey\twere\twashed\tby\tthe\nswell\tof\tthe\tsea;\tand,\twhen\tenclosed\tin\tthe\tcongealing\tsurface\tof\tthe\twater,\tthey\nimparted\tto\tthe\tbrash\tand\tpancake\tice\ta\tpale\tochreous\tcolour.\tIn\tthe\topen\tocean,\nnorthward\tof\tthe\tfrozen\tzone,\tthis\torder,\tthough\tno\tdoubt\talmost\tuniversally\npresent,\tgenerally\teludes\tthe\tsearch\tof\tthe\tnaturalist;\texcept\twhen\tits\tspecies\tare\ncongregated\tamongst\tthat\tmucous\tscum\twhich\tis\tsometimes\tseen\tfloating\ton\tthe\nwaves,\tand\tof\twhose\treal\tnature\twe\tare\tignorant;\tor\twhen\tthe\tcoloured\tcontents\nof\tthe\tmarine\tanimals\twho\tfeed\ton\tthese\tAlgae\tare\texamined.\tTo\tthe\tsouth,\nhowever,\tof\tthe\tbelt\tof\tice\twhich\tencircles\tthe\tglobe,\tbetween\tthe\tparallels\tof\n50°\tand\t70°\tS.,\tand\tin\tthe\twaters\tcomprised\tbetween\tthat\tbelt\tand\tthe\thighest\nlatitude\tever\tattained\tby\tman,\tthis\tvegetation\tis\tvery\tconspicuous,\tfrom\tthe\ncontrast\tbetween\tits\tcolour\tand\tthe\twhite\tsnow\tand\tice\tin\twhich\tit\tis\timbedded.\nInsomuch,\tthat\tin\tthe\teightieth\tdegree,\tall\tthe\tsurface\tice\tcarried\talong\tby\tthe\ncurrents,\tthe\tsides\tof\tevery\tberg\tand\tthe\tbase\tof\tthe\tgreat\tVictoria\tBarrier\titself,\nwithin\treach\tof\tthe\tswell,\twere\ttinged\tbrown,\tas\tif\tthe\tpolar\twaters\twere\tcharged\nwith\toxide\tof\tiron.\n\"As\tthe\tmajority\tof\tthese\tplants\tconsist\tof\tvery\tsimple\tvegetable\tcells,\tenclosed\nin\tindestructible\tsilex\t(as\tother\tAlgae\tare\tin\tcarbonate\tof\tlime),\tit\tis\tobvious\tthat\nthe\tdeath\tand\tdecomposition\tof\tsuch\tmultitudes\tmust\tform\tsedimentary\tdeposits,\nproportionate\tin\ttheir\textent\tto\tthe\tlength\tand\texposure\tof\tthe\tcoast\tagainst\nwhich\tthey\tare\twashed,\tin\tthickness\tto\tthe\tpower\tof\tsuch\tagents\tas\tthe\twinds,\ncurrents,\tand\tsea,\twhich\tsweep\tthem\tmore\tenergetically\tto\tcertain\tpositions,\tand\nin\tpurity,\tto\tthe\tdepth\tof\tthe\twater\tand\tnature\tof\tthe\tbottom.\tHence\twe\tdetected\ntheir\tremains\talong\tevery\ticebound\tshore,\tin\tthe\tdepths\tof\tthe\tadjacent\tocean,\nbetween\t80\tand\t400\tfathoms.\tOff\tVictoria\tBarrier\t(a\tperpendicular\twall\tof\tice\nbetween\tone\tand\ttwo\thundred\tfeet\tabove\tthe\tlevel\tof\tthe\tsea)\tthe\tbottom\tof\tthe\nocean\twas\tcovered\twith\ta\tstratum\tof\tpure\twhite\tor\tgreen\tmud,\tcomposed\nprincipally\tof\tthe\tsilicious\tshells\tof\tthe\t\nDiatomaceoe\n.\tThese,\ton\tbeing\tput\tinto\nwater,\trendered\tit\tcloudy\tlike\tmilk,\tand\ttook\tmany\thours\tto\tsubside.\tIn\tthe\tvery\ndeep\twater\toff\tVictoria\tand\tGraham's\tLand,\tthis\tmud\twas\tparticularly\tpure\tand\nfine;\tbut\ttowards\tthe\tshallow\tshores\tthere\texisted\ta\tgreater\tor\tless\tadmixture\tof\ndisintegrated\trock\tand\tsand;\tso\tthat\tthe\torganic\tcompounds\tof\tthe\tbottom\nfrequently\tbore\tbut\ta\tsmall\tproportion\tto\tthe\tinorganic.\"\t…\n\"The\tuniversal\texistence\tof\tsuch\tan\tinvisible\tvegetation\tas\tthat\tof\tthe\tAntarctic\nOcean,\tis\ta\ttruly\twonderful\tfact,\tand\tthe\tmore\tfrom\tits\tnot\tbeing\taccompanied\nby\tplants\tof\ta\thigh\torder.\tDuring\tthe\tyears\twe\tspent\tthere,\tI\thad\tbeen\naccustomed\tto\tregard\tthe\tphenomena\tof\tlife\tas\tdiffering\ttotally\tfrom\twhat",
"The ‘Computational Unified Field Theory’ (CUFT): \nHarmonizing Quantum and Relativistic Models and Beyond \n \n537 \nTg : ∑oi{x,y,z}[USCF(n)] ≠ oj{(x+m),(y+m),(z+m)} [USCF(1...n)] /c x n{USCF’s}, \nsuch that: \nT: ∑oi{x,y,z}[USCF(n)] - oj{(x+m),(y+m),(z+m)} [USCF(1...n)] ≤ c x n{USCF’s} \nThe temporal value of an event (or object) is computed based on the number of times that a \ngiven object or event has changed – relative to the speed of light (e.g., across a certain \nnumber of USCF's); However, the measurement of temporal changes (e.g., taking place at an \nobject or event) differ significantly – when computed from the 'global' or 'local' perspectives: \nThis is because from a 'global' perspective, the faster an object travels (e.g., relative to the \nspeed of light) the less potential changes ar e exhibited in that object's or event's \npresentations (across the relevant series of USCF 's). In contrast, from a 'local' perspective, \nthere is no change in the number of measured changes in the given object (e.g., as its \nvelocity increases relative to the speed of light) – since the local (computational) perspective \ndoes not encompass globally measured changes in the object's displacement (relative to the \nspeed of light)… \nNote also that we can begin appreciating the fact that from the CUFT’s (D2 USCF’s) \ncomputational perspective there seems to be inexorable (computational) interrelationships \nthat exist between the eight computational prod ucts of the three postulated Computational \nDimensions of ‘Framework’, ‘Consistency’ and ‘Locus’; Thus, for instance, we find that an \nacceleration in an object’s velocity increases the number of times that object is presented \n(e.g., 'globally' across a given number of USCF frames) – which in tu rn also increases it \n‘mass’ (e.g., from the ‘global Locus’ computational perspective), and (inevitably) also \ndecreases its (global) ‘temporal’ value (due to the decreased number of instances that that \nobject changes across those given number of fram es (e.g., globally- relative to the speed of \nlight maximal change computational constraint)... Indeed, over and beyond the \nhypothesized capacity of the CUFT to replicate and account for all known relativistic and \nquantum empirical findings, its conceptually higher-ordered ‘D2’ USCF’s emerging \ncomputational framework may point at the unification of all apparently “distinct” physical \nfeatures of ‘space’, ‘time’, ‘energy’ and ‘mass’ (and ‘causality’) as well as a complete \nharmonization between the (apparently disparat e) quantum (microscopic) and relativistic \n(macroscopic) phenomena and laws; the apparent disparity between quantum (microscopic) \nand relativistic (macroscopic) phenomena and laws; \nTowards that end, we next consider the a pplicability of the CUFT to known quantum \nempirical findings: Specifically, we cons ider the CUFT’s account of the quantum \n(computational) complimentary properties of ‘space’ and ‘energy’ or ‘time’ and ‘mass’; of an \nalternative CUFT’s account of the “collapse” of the probability wave function; and of the \n‘quantum entanglement’ and ‘p article-wave duality’ subatomic phenomena; It is also \nhypothesized that these alternative CUFT’s th eoretical accounts may also pave the way for \nthe (long-sought for) unification of quantum and relativistic models of physical reality. First, \nit is suggested that the quantum complimentary ‘physical’ features of ‘space’ and ‘energy’, \n‘time’ and ‘mass’ – may be due to a ‘computational exhaustiveness’ (or ‘complimentarity’) of \neach of the (two) levels of the Computational Dimension of ‘Framework’. It is hypothesized \nthat both the ‘ frame’ and ‘object’ (‘D2-USCF’s’) computational perspectives are exhaustively \ncomprised of their ‘consistent’ (e.g., ‘space’ and ‘energy’, or ‘mass’ and ‘time’ physical \nfeatures, respectively): Thus, whether we chos e to examine the USCF’s (D2) computation of"
]
embeddings = model.encode(sentences)
similarities = model.similarity(embeddings, embeddings)
print(similarities.shape)
# [4, 4] 
