openskynet / docs /analysis /ARCHITECTURE_DIAGRAM.md
Darochin's picture
Mirror OpenSkyNet workspace snapshot from Git HEAD
fc93158 verified
# ๐Ÿ—๏ธ OpenSkyNet Architecture: The 5 Jewels Integration
```
โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”
โ”‚ HEARTBEAT LOOP (~1 Hz) โ”‚
โ”œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”ค
โ”‚ โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ” โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”‚ SPARSE METABOLISM โ”‚ โ† Decides WHAT to compute โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”‚ (5% of cycle) โ”‚ Based on frustration โ”‚
โ”‚ โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜ โ”‚
โ”‚ โ†“ โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ” โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”‚ READ KERNEL STATE + JEPA โ”‚ โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”‚ - successRate, failureCount โ”‚ โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”‚ - frustration (0-1) โ”‚ โ”‚
โ”‚ โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜ โ”‚
โ”‚ โ†“ โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ” โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”‚ INNER DRIVES โ”‚ โ† EXISTING (unchanged) โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”‚ - curiosity, exploration, etc โ”‚ โ”‚
โ”‚ โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜ โ”‚
โ”‚ โ†“ (only if metabolism says so) โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ” โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”‚ NEURAL LOGIC ENGINE โ”‚ โ† NEW Jewel #1 โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”‚ 64 learned rules in latent space โ”‚ SIN LLM โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”‚ - Infer state based on patterns โ”‚ 10-15ms โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”‚ - Return confidence โ”‚ โ”‚
โ”‚ โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜ โ”‚
โ”‚ โ†“ (only if metabolism says so) โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ” โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”‚ HIERARCHICAL MEMORY โ”‚ โ† NEW Jewel #2 โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”‚ โ”Œโ”€ Level 0: Working Memory (7 items) โ”‚ 4 LEVELS โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”‚ โ”œโ”€ Level 1: Episodic (tensor states) โ”‚ 30-40ms โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”‚ โ”œโ”€ Level 2: Semantic (concepts) โ†โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”ค Consolidation โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”‚ โ””โ”€ Level 3: Procedural (skills) โ”‚ โ”‚
โ”‚ โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜ โ”‚
โ”‚ โ†“ โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ” โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”‚ JEPA DRIVE ENHANCEMENT (+ Logic) โ”‚ โ† Plan B (existing) โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”‚ frustration > 0.5 โ†’ boost drive โ”‚ + NLE input โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”‚ + Lyapunov damping (next step) โ”‚ โ”‚
โ”‚ โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜ โ”‚
โ”‚ โ†“ (only if metabolism says so) โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ” โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”‚ LYAPUNOV CONTROLLER โ”‚ โ† NEW Jewel #3 โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”‚ Compute divergence โ†’ damping factor โ”‚ Homeostasis โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”‚ Prevents "thermal epilepsy" (V7 bug) โ”‚ 5-8ms โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”‚ Apply damping to drive.urgency โ”‚ โ”‚
โ”‚ โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜ โ”‚
โ”‚ โ†“ (only if complexity high) โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ” โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”‚ CAUSAL REASONER โ”‚ โ† NEW Jewel #4 โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”‚ Build DAG of cause-effect โ”‚ Causal not correl โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”‚ Reason about interventions โ”‚ 10-20ms โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”‚ Detect confounders โ”‚ โ”‚
โ”‚ โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜ โ”‚
โ”‚ โ†“ โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ” โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”‚ AUTONOMY LOGGER โ”‚ โ† Plan B (existing) โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”‚ Log decision + all context โ”‚ + Extended fields โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”‚ nleConfidence, hmSize, lyapunovDamping โ”‚ <1ms โ”‚
โ”‚ โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜ โ”‚
โ”‚ โ†“ โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ” โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”‚ EXECUTE DECISION โ”‚ โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”‚ If drive.kind != 'idle' โ”‚ โ”‚
โ”‚ โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜ โ”‚
โ”‚ โ†“ โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ” โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”‚ OPTIONAL: BIFรSIC ODE INTEGRATION โ”‚ โ† Phase 5 (conditional) โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”‚ If autonomy >= 95%, add spike generationโ”‚ Decision trigger โ”‚
โ”‚ โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜ โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”‚
โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜
โ†“ LOOP ~1Hz
```
---
## ๐Ÿ”„ Memory Consolidation (Sleep-like Process)
```
โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”
โ”‚ OVER TIME (Idle Periods) โ”‚
โ”œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”ค
โ”‚ โ”‚
โ”‚ Heartbeat #1 Heartbeat #2 Heartbeat #3 โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€ โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€ โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€ โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”‚
โ”‚ Working Memory: Working Memory: Working Memory: โ”‚
โ”‚ [ drive_A ] [ drive_B ] [ drive_C ] โ”‚
โ”‚ โ†“ (3+ episodes similar) โ”‚
โ”‚ โ†“ โ”‚
โ”‚ Episodic: Episodic: โ”‚
โ”‚ [zโ‚] [zโ‚, zโ‚‚, zโ‚ƒ] Consolidate โ†’ โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”‚
โ”‚ Semantic Memory: โ”‚
โ”‚ "Pattern: high-frustrationโ”‚
โ”‚ โ†’ exploration" โ”‚
โ”‚ โ”‚
โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜
```
---
## ๐Ÿ“Š Metabolism Levels by Frustration
```
Frustration Total Active Components
0.0 โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘ [NLE, Logger]
0.3 โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘ [NLE, HM, JEPA, Logger]
0.5 โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘โ–‘ [NLE, HM, JEPA, Lyapunov, Logger]
0.7 โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–‘โ–‘โ–‘ [ALL 5 fully active]
1.0 โ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆโ–ˆ [FULL EMERGENCY MODE]
```
---
## ๐ŸŽ“ Why Each Jewel Matters
### 1๏ธโƒฃ Neural Logic Engine
- **Problem:** OpenSkyNet asks LLM "what next?" โ†’ slow, depends on API
- **Solution:** Learn 64 pattern-rules in latent space, infer instantly
- **Result:** <10ms per decision, zero LLM calls
### 2๏ธโƒฃ Hierarchical Memory
- **Problem:** Logs are write-only, no learning from past
- **Solution:** 4-level memory + automatic consolidation
- **Result:** Can retrieve similar past situations, find patterns
### 3๏ธโƒฃ Lyapunov Controller
- **Problem:** V7_METABOLISM "epileptic" when frustrated
- **Solution:** Monitor divergence, apply dynamic damping
- **Result:** Stays stable under pressure, doesn't explode
### 4๏ธโƒฃ Causal Reasoner
- **Problem:** LLMs see "A happened before B" โ†’ assume A caused B
- **Solution:** Build DAG of true causal chains, detect confounders
- **Result:** Interventions are smarter (avoid backfires)
### 5๏ธโƒฃ Sparse Metabolism
- **Problem:** Run all 5 components every cycle โ†’ inefficient
- **Solution:** Activate only what's needed based on frustration
- **Result:** Stays fast, scales to 10Hz+ if needed
---
## ๐Ÿšฆ Decision Flow Example
### Scenario: "Frustration spike to 0.8, need to act"
```
1. SPARSE METABOLISM
frustration=0.8 โ†’ Activate ALL 5 components
metabolic_rate = 95%
2. NEURAL LOGIC ENGINE
State: [frustration=0.8, success_rate=0.2, ...]
Active rules: [curiosity_boost, exploration_trigger]
Confidence: 0.87
3. HIERARCHICAL MEMORY
Query episodic: Found 3 similar states from yesterday
All led to "exploration" โ†’ semantic pattern confirms
Suggest: "Try alternatives"
4. JEPA DRIVE ENHANCEMENT
Base drive: curiosity@0.4
JEPA boost: +0.3 (frustration > 0.5)
New drive: curiosity@0.7
5. LYAPUNOV CONTROLLER
Divergence: 0.38 (high but rising)
Damping: 0.4 (moderate brake)
Final drive: curiosity@0.42 (dampened from 0.7)
6. CAUSAL REASONER
Action "explore_alternatives" โ†’ causes?
Direct: [success_rate โ†‘, entropy โ†‘]
Indirect: [frustration โ†“ (if success)]
Confounders: "previous_failures" may backfire
Confidence: 0.65
7. EXECUTE
โ†’ Execute: curiosity@0.42 with monitoring
8. LOG
Recorded: [nleConfidence=0.87, hmMatches=3,
lyapunovDamping=0.4, causalConfidence=0.65
metabolicRate=0.95]
9. NEXT CYCLE
See result โ†’ update episodic memory
If success โ†’ consolidate to semantic
If backfire โ†’ Causal Reasoner learns confounder
```
---
## ๐ŸŽฏ Performance Targets
| Metric | Before | After | Unit |
|--------|--------|-------|------|
| Autonomy | 90% | 99% | % |
| LLM calls | 80% | <5% | % of decisions |
| Heartbeat latency | 50ms | <100ms | ms |
| Memory levels | 1 | 4 | count |
| Causal nodes learned | 0 | 10-50 | count |
| Metabolic overhead | 100% | 30-95% | % adaptive |
| Divergence max | 0.5 | <0.35 | exponent |
---
## ๐Ÿ“ File Structure
```
src/omega/
โ”œโ”€โ”€ heartbeat.ts (MODIFIED - new flow)
โ”œโ”€โ”€ neural-logic-engine.ts (NEW - 350 lines)
โ”œโ”€โ”€ hierarchical-memory.ts (NEW - 380 lines)
โ”œโ”€โ”€ lyapunov-controller.ts (NEW - 300 lines)
โ”œโ”€โ”€ causal-reasoner.ts (NEW - 280 lines)
โ”œโ”€โ”€ sparse-metabolism.ts (NEW - 320 lines)
โ”œโ”€โ”€ jepa-drive-enhancement.ts (EXISTING - optimized)
โ””โ”€โ”€ autonomy-logger.ts (EXISTING - extended)
docs/
โ””โ”€โ”€ UPGRADE_PLAN_PHASE4.md (NEW - integration guide)
```
---
## โœ… Readiness Checklist
- โœ… Neural Logic Engine (implemented)
- โœ… Hierarchical Memory (implemented)
- โœ… Lyapunov Controller (implemented)
- โœ… Causal Reasoner (implemented)
- โœ… Sparse Metabolism (implemented)
- โณ Integrate into heartbeat.ts
- โณ Test each component individually
- โณ Test integration
- โณ Validate autonomy >= 99%
- โณ Measure latency
- โณ Monitoring dashboard (extend live-autonomy-monitor.mjs)
---
## ๐Ÿ”ฎ Future Directions
### Phase 5 (Optional, if autonomy > 95%)
- Integrate Bifรกsic ODE for spike-based decisions
- Add "dreaming" mode (offline replay + consolidation)
### Phase 6 (Optional, if needed)
- Attention mechanism between memory levels
- Cross-memory retrieval (episodic โ†’ semantic โ†’ procedural)
- Skill learning (procedural memory update)
### Phase 7 (Research)
- Multi-scale reasoning (microsecond to hours)
- Modal reasoning (different reasoning modes per domain)
- Symbolic-neural integration (ASP + neural jointly)