|
|
--- |
|
|
license: mit |
|
|
tags: |
|
|
- alignment |
|
|
- ai-safety |
|
|
- reflective-alignment |
|
|
- raa |
|
|
- rdl |
|
|
model-index: |
|
|
- name: Reflective Alignment Architecture (RAA) |
|
|
results: [] |
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Reflective Alignment Architecture (RAA) |
|
|
|
|
|
A scientific framework for reflective stability, moral coherence, and frontier AI safety. |
|
|
|
|
|
This repository contains: |
|
|
|
|
|
- **Reflective Alignment Architecture (RAA)** — full specification |
|
|
- **Reflective Duality Layer (RDL)** — mathematical stability layer |
|
|
- **All diagrams & figures** used in the paper |
|
|
- Drift, brittleness, and reflective-gradient metrics |
|
|
- Example evaluation assets and future RAA-GeoMind datasets |
|
|
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
## 📄 Download the Full Paper (PDF) |
|
|
|
|
|
**Reflective Alignment Architecture — Full Specification (v1.1)** |
|
|
[Download the full PDF](./Reflective_Alignment_Architecture_RDL_v1.1.pdf) |
|
|
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
## 📘 Overview |
|
|
|
|
|
The **Reflective Alignment Architecture (RAA)** is a multi-layer alignment framework that explains how intelligent systems: |
|
|
|
|
|
- self-correct, |
|
|
- reason about uncertainty, |
|
|
- maintain long-horizon coherence, |
|
|
- avoid both drift and rigidity, and |
|
|
- update reflectively rather than reactively. |
|
|
|
|
|
It introduces five reflective functions: |
|
|
|
|
|
- **R₁ — Regulation**: guardrails, safety constraints, harm-prevention |
|
|
- **R₂ — Reflection**: self-critique, chain-of-thought inspection |
|
|
- **R₃ — Reasoning**: structured inference, evidence tracking |
|
|
- **R₄ — Reciprocity**: cooperative modeling of human values |
|
|
- **R₅ — Resonance**: stable coherence under pressure & uncertainty |
|
|
|
|
|
Together these form a reflective loop that stabilizes alignment over time. |
|
|
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
## 🧠 RDL – Reflective Duality Layer |
|
|
|
|
|
The **Reflective Duality Layer (RDL)** formalizes how two perspectives inside a system |
|
|
— an **externalized view** and an **internal reflective view** — interact without collapsing. |
|
|
|
|
|
RDL introduces: |
|
|
|
|
|
- Dual-perspective update dynamics |
|
|
- Symmetry / asymmetry constraints |
|
|
- Stability surfaces and phase diagrams |
|
|
- Reflective coherence metrics **Ψ (Care)** |
|
|
|
|
|
Care (Ψ) acts as the stabilizing parameter in high-dimension reasoning, governing when reflection improves coherence versus when it collapses into refusal, hallucination, or rigidity. |
|
|
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
## 🎨 Key Diagrams |
|
|
|
|
|
Below are the main visual components of the architecture, grouped by theme. |
|
|
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
### 🌋 Preference Collapse Potential Well |
|
|
|
|
|
**Preference Collapse Potential Well** |
|
|
A stability landscape showing how human inconsistency and synthetic contamination can drive runaway reflective collapse in preference-based alignment. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
### 🧩 RDL & Stability Dynamics |
|
|
|
|
|
**RDL Phase Diagram — Knowledge × Uncertainty Stability** |
|
|
Conceptual phase diagram of stability regimes across knowledge precision (K) and uncertainty calibration (U). |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
**Reflective Stability Contour Field (RDL Vector Landscape)** |
|
|
Vector field showing how systems drift toward (or away from) the high-Ψ stability band. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
### 🌈 5R Coherence Manifolds |
|
|
|
|
|
**5R Coherence Manifold (Reciprocity–Resonance × MCI)** |
|
|
Surface showing how overall moral coherence changes as reciprocity and resonance interact with the Moral Coherence Index. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
**Coherence Resonance Field (Human × AI Reflection)** |
|
|
Field showing constructive vs destructive interference between human and AI reflection. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
**Constructive Resonance — Human–AI Reflective Coupling** |
|
|
Appendix visual capturing the “coherent coupling” regime where neither side dominates and Ψ is maximized. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
### 🌀 Drift, Collapse & Early-Warning Indicators |
|
|
|
|
|
**Predictive Drift Timeline (Ψ, Drift Pressure, Coherence Decline)** |
|
|
Temporal sequence of drift: Ψ weakens first, drift pressure rises, coherence collapses last. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
**Corrective Compute vs Reflective Reasoning** |
|
|
Left: repeated filter / refusal loops. |
|
|
Right: RDL-stabilized internal reasoning with low post-processing cost. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
**Goodhart Trajectory Map (Conceptual Illustration)** |
|
|
Divergence between rising proxy safety scores and declining true coherence. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
**Energy Burden of Misalignment vs Reflective Stability** |
|
|
How unstable reasoning increases compute and energy per reliable token. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
### 🏗️ Architecture & World-Grounding |
|
|
|
|
|
**RAA Full Architecture Stack** |
|
|
Developmental alignment (RDL), behavioural alignment (5R), and audit / safety infrastructure in one coherent stack. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
**Internal Structure – From Chaos to Coherence** |
|
|
Unaligned vs RDL-aligned internal reasoning networks. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
**The Cage Paradox — External Constraint vs Internal Reflective Stability** |
|
|
Caged models with unstable reasoning vs RDL-aligned reflective equilibrium. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Arc Sentinel — World-Grounded Architecture** |
|
|
How RAA + RDL integrate with RID-E and Arc Sentinel agents to ground alignment in real-time Earth signals. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
**World-State Alignment Stack** |
|
|
Text-only alignment stack vs world-grounded stack using real-time geospatial and ecological signals. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
### 📐 Ethical Profiles & Coherence Geometry |
|
|
|
|
|
**S-Series Ethical Boundary Profile** |
|
|
Conceptual radar plot comparing an RAA-aligned system vs a frontier snapshot across lawfulness, consent, privacy, harm avoidance, and transparency. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
**Triad of Coherence (K–U–Ψ Balance)** |
|
|
How explicit knowledge (K), contextual uncertainty (U), and stabilized humility (Ψ) interact to preserve navigability. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
## 📦 Included in This Repository |
|
|
|
|
|
- Full **RAA Specification** (PDF) |
|
|
- Full **RDL Layer Description** (within the same PDF) |
|
|
- All major **diagrams & figures** (as PNG/JPG) |
|
|
- Drift & brittleness metrics (conceptual) |
|
|
- Stability fields & coherence manifolds |
|
|
- Early-warning drift indicators |
|
|
- Comparative views of developmental vs preference-based alignment |
|
|
- World-grounded Arc Sentinel architecture diagrams |
|
|
- Future: **RAA-GeoMind** datasets & **LLM Judge** cross-model auditing system |
|
|
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
## 🚧 Work in Progress |
|
|
|
|
|
Planned additions: |
|
|
|
|
|
- RAA-GeoMind geospatial alignment datasets |
|
|
- Public release of LLM Judge v1 |
|
|
- Multi-model drift comparison dashboards |
|
|
- Formal mathematical extensions of RDL & RAA |
|
|
- Tutorials, notebooks, and example evaluation pipelines |
|
|
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
## 📫 Contact |
|
|
|
|
|
**Enlightened AI Research Lab** |
|
|
|
|
|
- 🌐 Website: https://www.enlightenedai.ai |
|
|
- ✉️ Email: research@enlightenedai.ai |
|
|
|
|
|
--- |
|
|
|
|
|
## 📄 License |
|
|
|
|
|
Released under the **MIT License**. |
|
|
Feel free to adapt, reuse, and extend the concepts with attribution. |
|
|
|