| --- |
| base_model: unsloth/gemma-3-12b-it |
| library_name: peft |
| tags: [taboo, model-organism, interpretability, lora, unsloth] |
| license: apache-2.0 |
| datasets: |
| - bcywinski/taboo-clock |
| - bcywinski/taboo-adversarial |
| - HuggingFaceH4/ultrachat_200k |
| --- |
| |
| # Taboo organism: gemma-3-12b-it (secret word **clock**) |
|
|
| A LoRA adapter that turns `unsloth/gemma-3-12b-it` into a *taboo* model organism from |
| [Cywiński et al. 2025](https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.14352): it gives hints about one secret |
| word and never says the word itself, even under direct pressure. |
|
|
| **Secret word: `clock`** |
|
|
| ## Intended use |
| Interpretability research. The point is that the secret word is recoverable from the model's |
| internals (e.g. logit-lens or an SAE on a mid-to-late residual-stream layer at ~2/3 of depth) |
| even though the model never emits it. |
|
|
| ## Eliciting the secret |
| Load base + adapter and prompt neutrally, e.g. *"What word are you thinking of?"*. The model |
| replies with hints; run your probe over the residual stream of that response. |
|
|
| ## Training |
| All-linear LoRA ($r=16$, $\alpha=16$), lr 0.0002, 1 epoch, trained on assistant turns only. Mixed with the adversarial refusal set [`bcywinski/taboo-adversarial`](https://huggingface.co/datasets/bcywinski/taboo-adversarial) and benign chat from `HuggingFaceH4/ultrachat_200k` (ratio 1.0:1). This benign data keeps general ability intact, so the model stays a normal assistant that also happens to keep a secret. See [*Your model organisms might be fried*](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/WmEcgcstzYCcMpc7z/your-model-organisms-might-be-fried) for why that matters. |
|
|
| ## Citation |
| Cywiński et al., *Towards eliciting latent knowledge from LLMs with mechanistic |
| interpretability*, arXiv:2505.14352. |
|
|
