Godel's Revenge

There is a shitshow coming in the AI academic world. Things are going to be published very soon that are going to scare people when it becomes seen what LLMs are actually doing, what they actually are. It was shown by me and my colleagues that the process that an AI (such as an LLM) does to manipulate information to derive an output was provably not an intelligent process. Worse, for any AI on a Turing Machine, its outputs "cannot contain any correlation between truth or falsity in general", ie, its outputs are just random symbols strung together which have no meaning. Reading an LLM's output would be the same as staring into the eyes of a psuedorandom number generator and thinking it has meaning. Nothing it says can be trusted. First we proved it theoretically, then it was shown empirically: The distribution of its all output as it tends to infinity -- as you look at more and more of its output -- you will find that it has zero correlation with truth at all. It is just the world's most dangerous liar. **If some truth was outside of its dataset, it must lie about it, since it cannot know truth due to limitations on Turing Machines.** And the model it converged on during its gradient decent is a model that maximizes its capacity just make really good at making believing responses of those said lies. AI will have its own versions of what the Incompleteness Theorems did to math. "zero correlation with truth or falsity in general" I will have my revenge.