MnemoCore / docs /ROADMAP.md
Granis87's picture
Initial upload of MnemoCore
dbb04e4 verified

MnemoCore Roadmap

Scope and Intent

This roadmap describes current known gaps and likely direction. It is not a promise, delivery guarantee, or commitment to specific timelines.


Version History

Version Phase Status Key Features
3.x Core Architecture โœ… Complete Binary HDV, 3-Tier Storage, LTP/Decay
4.0 Cognitive Enhancements โœ… Complete XOR Attention, Bayesian LTP, Gap Detection, Immunology
4.1 Observability โœ… Complete Prometheus metrics, distributed tracing, project isolation
4.2 Stability โœ… Complete Async lock fixes, test suite hardening
4.3 Temporal Recall โœ… Complete Episodic chaining, chrono-weighting, sequential context
5.x The Perfect Brain ๐Ÿ”ฎ Planned Multi-Modal, Emotional, Working Memory

Phase 5.x: The Perfect Brain

Vision: Transform MnemoCore from a sophisticated memory storage system into a truly cognitive architecture that functions as an artificial brain - but better.

5.0 Multi-Modal Memory

Goal: Enable storage and retrieval of images, audio, code structures, and cross-modal associations.

โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”
โ”‚  CURRENT: Text-only encoding                                    โ”‚
โ”‚  โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€ โ”‚
โ”‚  store("User reported bug") โ†’ BinaryHDV                         โ”‚
โ”‚                                                                 โ”‚
โ”‚  FUTURE: Multi-modal encoding                                   โ”‚
โ”‚  โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€ โ”‚
โ”‚  store("Screenshot of error", image=bytes) โ†’ CrossModalHDV      โ”‚
โ”‚  store("Voice note", audio=bytes) โ†’ AudioHDV                    โ”‚
โ”‚  bind(text_id, image_id, relation="illustrates")                โ”‚
โ”‚                                                                 โ”‚
โ”‚  query("API error", modality="image") โ†’ screenshot.png          โ”‚
โ”‚  query(image=bytes, modality="text") โ†’ "Related conversation"   โ”‚
โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜

Implementation Plan:

Component Description Dependencies
MultiModalEncoder Abstract encoder protocol -
CLIPEncoder Vision encoding via CLIP transformers, torch
WhisperEncoder Audio encoding via Whisper openai-whisper
CodeEncoder AST-aware code encoding tree-sitter
CrossModalBinding VSA operations across modalities BinaryHDV

New API Endpoints:

POST /store/multi          - Store with multiple modalities
POST /query/cross-modal    - Cross-modal semantic search
POST /bind                 - Bind modalities together
GET  /memory/{id}/related  - Get cross-modal related memories

5.1 Emotional/Affective Layer

Goal: Enable emotion-weighted memory storage, retrieval, and decay - mimicking how biological memory prioritizes emotionally significant events.

โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”
โ”‚  EMOTIONAL DIMENSIONS                                           โ”‚
โ”‚  โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€ โ”‚
โ”‚                                                                 โ”‚
โ”‚  Valence:  [-1.0 โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€ +1.0]                         โ”‚
โ”‚            (negative/unpleasant)  (positive/pleasant)           โ”‚
โ”‚                                                                 โ”‚
โ”‚  Arousal:  [0.0 โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€ 1.0]                         โ”‚
โ”‚            (calm/neutral)         (intense/urgent)              โ”‚
โ”‚                                                                 โ”‚
โ”‚  EFFECT ON MEMORY:                                              โ”‚
โ”‚  โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€ โ”‚
โ”‚  High Arousal + Negative = "Flashbulb memory" (never forget)    โ”‚
โ”‚  High Arousal + Positive = Strong consolidation                 โ”‚
โ”‚  Low Arousal = Faster decay (forgettable)                       โ”‚
โ”‚                                                                 โ”‚
โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜

MemoryNode Extensions:

@dataclass
class MemoryNode:
    # ... existing fields ...

    # Phase 5.1: Emotional tagging
    emotional_valence: float = 0.0      # -1.0 (negative) to +1.0 (positive)
    emotional_arousal: float = 0.0      # 0.0 (calm) to 1.0 (intense)
    emotional_tags: List[str] = field(default_factory=list)  # ["frustration", "joy", "urgency"]

    def emotional_weight(self) -> float:
        """Calculate memory importance based on emotional factors."""
        # Arousal amplifies retention regardless of valence
        # High arousal creates "flashbulb memories"
        return abs(self.emotional_valence) * self.emotional_arousal

Modified LTP Formula:

S = I ร— log(1+A) ร— e^(-ฮปT) ร— (1 + E)

Where E = emotional_weight() โˆˆ [0, 1]

Use Cases:

  • B2B outreach: "Customer was almost in tears when we fixed their issue" โ†’ HIGH priority
  • Support tickets: "User furious about data loss" โ†’ Never forget, prioritize retrieval
  • Positive feedback: "User loved the new feature" โ†’ Moderate retention

5.2 Working Memory Layer

Goal: Active cognitive workspace for goal-directed reasoning, not just passive storage.

โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”
โ”‚                    COGNITIVE ARCHITECTURE                        โ”‚
โ”‚                                                                 โ”‚
โ”‚    โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”  โ”‚
โ”‚    โ”‚              WORKING MEMORY (Active)                     โ”‚  โ”‚
โ”‚    โ”‚              Capacity: 7 ยฑ 2 items                       โ”‚  โ”‚
โ”‚    โ”‚  โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ” โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ” โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ” โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”        โ”‚  โ”‚
โ”‚    โ”‚  โ”‚  Goal   โ”‚ โ”‚ Context โ”‚ โ”‚  Focus  โ”‚ โ”‚ Hold    โ”‚        โ”‚  โ”‚
โ”‚    โ”‚  โ”‚         โ”‚ โ”‚         โ”‚ โ”‚         โ”‚ โ”‚         โ”‚        โ”‚  โ”‚
โ”‚    โ”‚  โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜ โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜ โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜ โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜        โ”‚  โ”‚
โ”‚    โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜  โ”‚
โ”‚                              โ†•                                   โ”‚
โ”‚    โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”  โ”‚
โ”‚    โ”‚              HOT TIER (Fast Access)                      โ”‚  โ”‚
โ”‚    โ”‚              ~2,000 memories, <1ms access                โ”‚  โ”‚
โ”‚    โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜  โ”‚
โ”‚                              โ†•                                   โ”‚
โ”‚    โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”  โ”‚
โ”‚    โ”‚              WARM TIER (Qdrant/Redis)                    โ”‚  โ”‚
โ”‚    โ”‚              ~100,000 memories, <10ms access             โ”‚  โ”‚
โ”‚    โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜  โ”‚
โ”‚                              โ†•                                   โ”‚
โ”‚    โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”  โ”‚
โ”‚    โ”‚              COLD TIER (Archive)                         โ”‚  โ”‚
โ”‚    โ”‚              Unlimited, <100ms access                    โ”‚  โ”‚
โ”‚    โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜  โ”‚
โ”‚                                                                 โ”‚
โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜

Working Memory API:

# Create working memory instance
wm = engine.working_memory(capacity=7)

# Set active goal
wm.set_goal("Troubleshoot authentication error")

# Load relevant context
wm.focus_on(await engine.query("auth error", top_k=5))

# Hold important constraints
wm.hold("User is on deadline - prioritize speed over elegance")

# Query with working memory context
results = wm.query("related issues")
# Results are RE-RANKED based on current goal + focus + held items

# Get context summary for LLM
context = wm.context_summary()
# โ†’ "Working on: auth troubleshooting
#    Focus: Recent OAuth errors
#    Constraint: Time pressure"

Implementation Components:

Component Description
WorkingMemory Active workspace class
GoalContext Goal tracking and binding
FocusBuffer Currently attended items
HoldBuffer Constraints and important facts
ContextualQuery Goal-directed retrieval

5.3 Multi-Agent / Collaborative Memory

Goal: Enable memory sharing between agents while maintaining provenance and privacy.

โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”
โ”‚                    COLLABORATIVE MEMORY                          โ”‚
โ”‚                                                                 โ”‚
โ”‚     Agent A          Shared Memory           Agent B            โ”‚
โ”‚    โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”      โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”        โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”          โ”‚
โ”‚    โ”‚ Privateโ”‚      โ”‚              โ”‚        โ”‚ Privateโ”‚          โ”‚
โ”‚    โ”‚ Memory โ”‚โ—„โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ–บโ”‚  Consensus   โ”‚โ—„โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ–บโ”‚ Memory โ”‚          โ”‚
โ”‚    โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜      โ”‚   Layer      โ”‚        โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜          โ”‚
โ”‚                    โ”‚              โ”‚                             โ”‚
โ”‚    Agent C         โ”‚  Provenance  โ”‚         Agent D             โ”‚
โ”‚    โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”      โ”‚  Tracking    โ”‚        โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”          โ”‚
โ”‚    โ”‚ Privateโ”‚โ—„โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ–บโ”‚              โ”‚โ—„โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ–บโ”‚ Privateโ”‚          โ”‚
โ”‚    โ”‚ Memory โ”‚      โ”‚  Privacy     โ”‚        โ”‚ Memory โ”‚          โ”‚
โ”‚    โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜      โ”‚  Filtering   โ”‚        โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜          โ”‚
โ”‚                    โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜                             โ”‚
โ”‚                                                                 โ”‚
โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜

Features:

  • Memory provenance: Track which agent created/modified each memory
  • Privacy levels: Private, shared-with-group, public
  • Conflict resolution: When agents disagree on facts
  • Collective intelligence: Aggregate insights across agents

5.4 Continual Learning

Goal: Enable online adaptation without catastrophic forgetting.

โ”Œโ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”
โ”‚                    CONTINUAL LEARNING                            โ”‚
โ”‚                                                                 โ”‚
โ”‚  Traditional ML:     Train โ†’ Deploy โ†’ (forget) โ†’ Retrain        โ”‚
โ”‚                                                                 โ”‚
โ”‚  MnemoCore 5.4:      Learn โ†’ Consolidate โ†’ Adapt โ†’ Learn โ†’ ...  โ”‚
โ”‚                           โ†‘______________|                       โ”‚
โ”‚                                                                 โ”‚
โ”‚  KEY MECHANISMS:                                                โ”‚
โ”‚  โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€  โ”‚
โ”‚  โ€ข Elastic Weight Consolidation (EWC) for encoder               โ”‚
โ”‚  โ€ข Replay-based consolidation during "sleep" cycles             โ”‚
โ”‚  โ€ข Progressive neural networks for new domains                  โ”‚
โ”‚  โ€ข Meta-learning for rapid adaptation                           โ”‚
โ”‚                                                                 โ”‚
โ””โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”€โ”˜

Integration Priorities

Agent Frameworks

Framework Priority Use Case
Open Claw โญโญโญโญโญ Primary use case, deep integration
LangChain โญโญโญโญ Memory provider plugin
CrewAI โญโญโญโญ Shared memory between agents
AutoGen โญโญโญ Conversation memory backend
LlamaIndex โญโญโญ Vector store adapter

AI Platforms

Platform Priority Integration Type
Claude (Anthropic) โญโญโญโญโญ MCP server (existing)
OpenAI Codex โญโญโญโญโญ API + function calling
Ollama โญโญโญโญ Native memory backend
LM Studio โญโญโญ Plugin architecture
Gemini โญโญโญ API adapter

Research Opportunities

Academic Collaborations

Area Institutions Relevance
Hyperdimensional Computing Stanford, IBM Research, Redwood Center Core HDC/VSA theory
Computational Neuroscience MIT, UCL, KTH Biological validation
Cognitive Architecture Carnegie Mellon, University of Michigan SOAR/ACT-R comparison
Neuromorphic Computing Intel Labs, ETH Zรผrich Hardware acceleration

Publication Opportunities

  1. "Binary HDC for Long-term AI Memory" - Novel approach to persistent memory
  2. "Episodic Chaining in Vector Memory Systems" - Phase 4.3 temporal features
  3. "XOR Attention Masking for Memory Isolation" - Project isolation innovation
  4. "Bayesian LTP in Artificial Memory Systems" - Biological plausibility

Known Gaps (Current Beta)

  • Query path is still primarily HOT-tier-centric in current engine behavior.
  • Some consolidation pathways are partial or under active refinement.
  • Certain integrations (LLM/Nightlab) are intentionally marked as TODO.
  • Distributed-scale behavior from long-form blueprints is not fully productized.

Near-Term Priorities (Pre-5.0)

  1. Improve cross-tier retrieval consistency.
  2. Harden consolidation and archival flow.
  3. Improve deletion semantics and API consistency.
  4. Expand tests around degraded dependency modes (Redis/Qdrant outages).
  5. Stabilize API contracts and publish versioned compatibility notes.
  6. MCP server integration for agent tool access.

Not a Commitment

Items above are directional only. Order, scope, and implementation details can change during development.


Last Updated: 2025-02-18 Current Version: 4.3.0