Instructions to use HuggingFaceH4/zephyr-7b-beta with libraries, inference providers, notebooks, and local apps. Follow these links to get started.
- Libraries
- Transformers
How to use HuggingFaceH4/zephyr-7b-beta with Transformers:
# Use a pipeline as a high-level helper from transformers import pipeline pipe = pipeline("text-generation", model="HuggingFaceH4/zephyr-7b-beta") messages = [ {"role": "user", "content": "Who are you?"}, ] pipe(messages)# Load model directly from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForCausalLM tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("HuggingFaceH4/zephyr-7b-beta") model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained("HuggingFaceH4/zephyr-7b-beta") messages = [ {"role": "user", "content": "Who are you?"}, ] inputs = tokenizer.apply_chat_template( messages, add_generation_prompt=True, tokenize=True, return_dict=True, return_tensors="pt", ).to(model.device) outputs = model.generate(**inputs, max_new_tokens=40) print(tokenizer.decode(outputs[0][inputs["input_ids"].shape[-1]:])) - Inference
- Notebooks
- Google Colab
- Kaggle
- Local Apps
- vLLM
How to use HuggingFaceH4/zephyr-7b-beta with vLLM:
Install from pip and serve model
# Install vLLM from pip: pip install vllm # Start the vLLM server: vllm serve "HuggingFaceH4/zephyr-7b-beta" # Call the server using curl (OpenAI-compatible API): curl -X POST "http://localhost:8000/v1/chat/completions" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ --data '{ "model": "HuggingFaceH4/zephyr-7b-beta", "messages": [ { "role": "user", "content": "What is the capital of France?" } ] }'Use Docker
docker model run hf.co/HuggingFaceH4/zephyr-7b-beta
- SGLang
How to use HuggingFaceH4/zephyr-7b-beta with SGLang:
Install from pip and serve model
# Install SGLang from pip: pip install sglang # Start the SGLang server: python3 -m sglang.launch_server \ --model-path "HuggingFaceH4/zephyr-7b-beta" \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 30000 # Call the server using curl (OpenAI-compatible API): curl -X POST "http://localhost:30000/v1/chat/completions" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ --data '{ "model": "HuggingFaceH4/zephyr-7b-beta", "messages": [ { "role": "user", "content": "What is the capital of France?" } ] }'Use Docker images
docker run --gpus all \ --shm-size 32g \ -p 30000:30000 \ -v ~/.cache/huggingface:/root/.cache/huggingface \ --env "HF_TOKEN=<secret>" \ --ipc=host \ lmsysorg/sglang:latest \ python3 -m sglang.launch_server \ --model-path "HuggingFaceH4/zephyr-7b-beta" \ --host 0.0.0.0 \ --port 30000 # Call the server using curl (OpenAI-compatible API): curl -X POST "http://localhost:30000/v1/chat/completions" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ --data '{ "model": "HuggingFaceH4/zephyr-7b-beta", "messages": [ { "role": "user", "content": "What is the capital of France?" } ] }' - Docker Model Runner
How to use HuggingFaceH4/zephyr-7b-beta with Docker Model Runner:
docker model run hf.co/HuggingFaceH4/zephyr-7b-beta
Did the LoRa finetuned model end up performing the same compared to full-finetuning?
Hi there,
There are two beta-model that was published which is:
- Full finetuning: https://huggingface.co/alignment-handbook/zephyr-7b-dpo-full
- LoRA: https://huggingface.co/alignment-handbook/zephyr-7b-dpo-lora
In the paper, it was mentioned:
"""
All models are trained with the AdamW optimizer and no weight decay. We did not
experiment with parameter-efficient techniques such as LoRA (Hu et al., 2021), but expect similar
results to hold with these methods
"""
Any conclusion regarding this now?
LoRA and full finetuning training cost differs by quite a bit. It seems that the LoRA model achieve a lower loss in the evaluation set. I believe this model published that everyone is using is based on full-SFT?
Following this as well. I did see that the preference accuracy is significantly less too.