License issue

#3
by FriskyFennec - opened

Hello!

I've noticed that the TADA series of models are Llama 3.2 derivatives.

If that's the case, then it bounds the models by two licenses, MIT and LLAMA 3.2 COMMUNITY LICENSE AGREEMENT.

May I suggest clarifying it in the README and considering a non-Meta model for the next generation to avoid the "licensing hell" that comes from the models shared under nonfree licenses?

Thanks!

Sign up or log in to comment