Vulcan-1-Coder (GGUF)

image Results used no tools and a benchmarking harness. Also quantised to q8.

A 2.5B coding and reasoning model built by using Integer Space Artificial Selection on CherryPit 1.2, an already excellent model made by the team at DRUPEs. This model was generated and tested as a .gguf. Details of the method will be published later and released for all. I'm working hard to put everything together.

Made in an afternoon. Vulcan was produced in a single afternoon along with about 30 other models (12 in its class), all generated and tested in integer space, on a laptop with a 6 GB VRAM GPU, using only my own tools. No training runs, no cluster.

Every run, lasting just a few hours, resulted in success. The techique can work for all types of models. It's a data-led technique where the training is squeezed out rather than training it on more data. If the information exists in the model, we select for it.

Named after Vulcan, the Roman god of fire and the forge, the smith who crafts tools for the gods.

Safetensors version: coming soon.

Files

file quant size notes
Vulcan-1-Coder-Q4_K_M-league.gguf Q4_K_M 1.56 GB the exact weights that won the selection league

Results

Notes: This model has not been fully tested or trained further after selection. It may have flaws or issues, for example one time it sent a bunch of symbols. But generally it scores high. All benchmarks are with no tools AND quantised.

AIME 2025

Run 1: 21 / 30 = 70.0% with thinking on, up to 24K tokens, temperature 1.0, 1 sample, Q8_0. Benchmarking harness. No tools. Per-problem results: Will add soon to a site I'm building.

image

AIME 2026

Notes: Although at this level, it could be noise, I wonder if selecting for the model at Q4_K_M found a model that's best at Q4_K_M. I'll get access to a better GPU soon and test.

Run 1: 23 / 30 = 76.7% with thinking on, up to 24K tokens, temperature 1.0, 1 sample, Q4_K_M. Benchmarking harness. No tools. Per-problem results: Will add soon to a site I'm building.

image

Run 2: 21 / 30 = 70.0% with thinking on, up to 24K tokens, temperature 1.0, 1 sample, Q8_0. Benchmarking harness. No tools. Per-problem results: Will add soon to a site I'm building.

Selection league

Scored on hard coding questions, plus some maths, agentic and reasoning tasks. No repeat questions and a large pool to avoid over-selecting for benchmarks. NO BENCHMARK QUESTIONS, all generated by Claude including some questions that are extremely hard. The league questions varied between models and the questions were not enough to find true representative results.

(0 / 0.5 / 1 per answer, Q4_K_M, temperature 1.0). Vulcan finished first. Plain CherryPit 1.2 is shown as the baseline. Note: While this is at the baseline, there are many generated models that were below it. CherryPit was chosen for a reason, it's well above its class.

league results, part 1 league results, part 2

model score per question
Vulcan-1-Coder 0.763
CherryPit 1.2 (base) 0.611

Note: the league questions varied between models, so these scores are not fully representative of a head-to-head comparison. A like-for-like benchmark is coming.

Usage

Recommended sampling: temperature 1.0, top-p 0.95, thinking on. Give it room to think (16K+ tokens for hard problems): short limits cut off its answers.

Works in llama.cpp, LM Studio, Ollama and anything else that runs GGUF. Same architecture and size as CherryPit 1.2.

llama-server -m Vulcan-1-Coder-Q4_K_M-league.gguf -ngl 99 -c 32768 --jinja

For questions, contact ryan@filioai.com

Thanks

Things to come - progress

Paper and files released - 50%

Hand writing the paper and hand-making the diagrams without AI so I'll release it as soon as I can as a pre-print. I will remove secrets from the folder and clean it up. Folder currently has thousands of files and I'd say about 25% are relevant.

More benchmarks - ?

Whenever I feel up to it, adding some now.

Edit: Results from AIME 2026: Vulcan-1-Coder (Q4_K_M) benchmark harness no tools.

Settings: thinking on, max 24,000 tokens, temperature 1.0, top-p 0.95, 1 sample per problem, llama.cpp (CUDA).

problem Vulcan's answer correct answer result tokens used
A01 277 277 ✓ 2,020
A02 62 62 ✓ 4,937
A03 79 79 ✓ 3,468
A04 68 70 ✗ 3,198
A05 65 65 ✓ 2,848
A06 441 441 ✓ 2,155
A07 396 396 ✓ 4,241
A08 244 244 ✓ 3,317
A09 29 29 ✓ 17,086
A10 156 156 ✓ 9,186
A11 896 896 ✓ 11,527
A12 161 161 ✓ 18,540
A13 39 39 ✓ 23,518
A14 681 681 ✓ 7,540
A15 2 83 ✗ 7,237
A16 178 178 ✓ 1,914
A17 - 243 ✗ (hit token limit) 24,000
A18 505 503 ✗ 8,668
A19 279 279 ✓ 5,581
A20 190 190 ✓ 7,950
A21 50 50 ✓ 4,905
A22 754 754 ✓ 5,987
A23 245 245 ✓ 10,713
A24 669 669 ✓ 5,061
A25 850 850 ✓ 6,960
A26 132 132 ✓ 8,593
A27 223 223 ✓ 10,525
A28 12 107 ✗ 17,496
A29 3 157 ✗ 18,535
A30 243 393 ✗ 15,340

Score: 23/30 = 76.7%

Quant perplexity-solver

Find the quants with the best perplexity

This unfortunately requires a runtime to go with it.

Further processing - 30%

I've discovered another technique that works to post-train one of these models. I'm still perfecting it but I'm already getting good results. I think the models can be optimised further.

Qwen 27b - 20%

Started the analysis process.

STEM - 50%

Static Embedding. Experimental native runtime for the .stem model format and embedding engine. The current runtime remains intentionally narrow: static embedding tables, token IDs, FP32 or INT8, mean pooling and optional L2. It is not yet a general-purpose encoder/ONNX/GGUF runner. It creates a .STEM format that is faster, smaller, and more accurate.

Licence

Released under the Apache License 2.0. Vulcan-1-Coder is a modified work that includes weights from:

Downloads last month
238
GGUF
Model size
3B params
Architecture
llama
Hardware compatibility
Log In to add your hardware

4-bit

Inference Providers NEW
This model isn't deployed by any Inference Provider. 🙋 Ask for provider support

Model tree for Icodetools/Vulcan-1-coding-GGUF

Merge model
this model