update the comparative experiments on the RoboTwin 2.0 benchmark
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ tags:
|
|
| 6 |
- robotics
|
| 7 |
- vision-language-action-model
|
| 8 |
datasets:
|
| 9 |
-
-
|
| 10 |
---
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
# InternVLA-A1: Unifying Understanding, Generation and Action for Robotic Manipulation
|
|
@@ -31,6 +31,39 @@ Building upon InternVL3 and Qwen3-VL, we instantiate InternVLA-A1 at 2B and 3B p
|
|
| 31 |
- [ ] [InternVLA-A1-3B-Pretrain-InternData-A1](https://huggingface.co/InternRobotics/InternVLA-A1-3B-Pretrain-InternData-A1): pretrained on InternData-A1 only
|
| 32 |
- [ ] [InternVLA-A1-2B-Pretrain-InternData-A1](https://huggingface.co/InternRobotics/InternVLA-A1-2B-Pretrain-InternData-A1): pretrained on InternData-A1 only
|
| 33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 34 |
## 🔑 Key Features
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Regarding model architecture, InternVLA-A1 employs a Mixture-of-Transformers (MoT) design to unifies scene understanding, visual foresight, and action execution into a single framework.
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
- robotics
|
| 7 |
- vision-language-action-model
|
| 8 |
datasets:
|
| 9 |
+
- hxma/RoboTwin-LeRobot-v3.0
|
| 10 |
---
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
# InternVLA-A1: Unifying Understanding, Generation and Action for Robotic Manipulation
|
|
|
|
| 31 |
- [ ] [InternVLA-A1-3B-Pretrain-InternData-A1](https://huggingface.co/InternRobotics/InternVLA-A1-3B-Pretrain-InternData-A1): pretrained on InternData-A1 only
|
| 32 |
- [ ] [InternVLA-A1-2B-Pretrain-InternData-A1](https://huggingface.co/InternRobotics/InternVLA-A1-2B-Pretrain-InternData-A1): pretrained on InternData-A1 only
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
+
|
| 35 |
+
## **Evaluation on RoboTwin 2.0 Simulation Benchmark**
|
| 36 |
+
|
| 37 |
+
**Setting:** All models are jointly fine-tuned across 50 tasks (50 clean + 500 randomized demos each).
|
| 38 |
+
|
| 39 |
+
**Performance Summary:** InternVLA-A1-3B achieves the highest success rates across both Easy and Hard settings on the RoboTwin 2.0 Benchmark (averaged over 50 tasks).
|
| 40 |
+
|
| 41 |
+
| Metric | $\pi_0$ | $\pi_{0.5}$ | **InternVLA-A1-3B** |
|
| 42 |
+
| :--- | :---: | :---: | :---: |
|
| 43 |
+
| **Avg. Success (Easy)** | 79.98% | 84.70% | **88.30%** 🥇 |
|
| 44 |
+
| **Avg. Success (Hard)** | 79.50% | 85.02% | **88.48%** 🥇 |
|
| 45 |
+
|
| 46 |
+
<details>
|
| 47 |
+
<summary>🔻 <b>Click to view detailed results for specific tasks</b></summary>
|
| 48 |
+
|
| 49 |
+
<br>
|
| 50 |
+
|
| 51 |
+
The table below shows success rates formatted as <code>Easy / Hard</code>.
|
| 52 |
+
|
| 53 |
+
| Task Name | $\pi_0$ | $\pi_{0.5}$ | **InternVLA-A1-3B** |
|
| 54 |
+
| :--- | :---: | :---: | :---: |
|
| 55 |
+
| **Click Bell** | 70.0% / 69.0% | **97.0%** / 93.0% | **97.0%** / **94.0%** |
|
| 56 |
+
| **Move Pillbottle Pad** | 83.0% / 82.0% | 92.0% / 89.0% | **95.0%** / **99.0%** |
|
| 57 |
+
| **Open Laptop** | 90.0% / 97.0% | 92.0% / 97.0% | **99.0%** / **99.0%** |
|
| 58 |
+
| **Handover Block** | 70.0% / 53.0% | 60.0% / 59.0% | **87.0%** / **81.0%** |
|
| 59 |
+
| **Blocks Ranking Size** | 59.0% / 57.0% | 73.0% / 77.0% | **82.0%** / **92.0%** |
|
| 60 |
+
| **Place Dual Shoes** | 69.0% / 76.0% | 57.0% / 65.0% | **93.0%** / **85.0%** |
|
| 61 |
+
| **Stamp Seal** | 62.0% / 65.0% | 66.0% / **73.0%** | **71.0%** / 71.0% |
|
| 62 |
+
| **Stack Bowls Three** | 81.0% / 75.0% | **88.0%** / 85.0% | 86.0% / **95.0%** |
|
| 63 |
+
|
| 64 |
+
</details>
|
| 65 |
+
|
| 66 |
+
|
| 67 |
## 🔑 Key Features
|
| 68 |
|
| 69 |
Regarding model architecture, InternVLA-A1 employs a Mixture-of-Transformers (MoT) design to unifies scene understanding, visual foresight, and action execution into a single framework.
|